No they are not they are herbivores they are strong for their size but comparatively weak to carnivores. Try eating only vegetables for a month and see how strong you feel
Most Roman arena hunts actually used ostriches since they could be bred on site and local fauna like boars and deer. Someimes you'd see bears from the European parts of the empire. Things like lions, crocs, and elephants weren't nearly as common because they had to be captured alive (very difficult) and transported to Rome. The thing is, emperors wanted to look good, so every time they did import something big they advertised the hell out of it, which means we're more likely to find records of it. Of course a lot of rare African animals were doomed to die in arenas - particularly lions, crocodiles, and hippos (an Egypt craze swept through Rome after its capture, so the Nile combo pack was pretty popular).
Rhino > tiger > lion > gorilla
Rhino is the biggest and gorilla is the smallest. Size > all
You're not beating an animal that has a leg the size of your torso.
gorillas don’t have the killer instinct though. they’re herbivores
So are elephants yet they'll happily stomp the shit out of you if they perceive you as a threat.
a gorilla would just have to choke the lion
i think people think lions are stronger because at a glance they appear bigger
Gorilla mk2 is stronger. Because of them we can't have nice things and in general need home security devices and such.
No they are not they are herbivores they are strong for their size but comparatively weak to carnivores. Try eating only vegetables for a month and see how strong you feel
I think they're imagining which would win in a fight, not which can push the most weight
rino still wins
That changes nothing. The animal that can push the most weight also has a thick skin and a big ass weapon on his nose
How do you measure strenght? Bite? Grip? Carrying capacity?
You measure it by whether or not it's a rhino
people now:
>WAHHHH MY ANIMAL COULD BEAT YOUR ANIMAL IN A FIGHT!!!
people 2,000 years ago:
>let's put them together in an arena IRL and find out
Humans win. Steel weapons are a million times more dangerous than any fang or claw.
Throwing a rock and running away BTFOs all of nature
they didnt have steel 2000 years ago
They had steel 4000 years ago.
>sir penis
this is where most of africas fauna went; to die in the arena for cheap thrills
Imagine actually believing that.
Most Roman arena hunts actually used ostriches since they could be bred on site and local fauna like boars and deer. Someimes you'd see bears from the European parts of the empire. Things like lions, crocs, and elephants weren't nearly as common because they had to be captured alive (very difficult) and transported to Rome. The thing is, emperors wanted to look good, so every time they did import something big they advertised the hell out of it, which means we're more likely to find records of it. Of course a lot of rare African animals were doomed to die in arenas - particularly lions, crocodiles, and hippos (an Egypt craze swept through Rome after its capture, so the Nile combo pack was pretty popular).
but which one is it
Clearly the lion is 77% strong whereas the other animals are only 6 to 8% strong
This is why you're always hearing about Ligers but rarely about Tions.
Rhino > tiger > lion > gorilla
Rhino is the biggest and gorilla is the smallest. Size > all
You're not beating an animal that has a leg the size of your torso.
gorilla can beat lion easy
Leopards eat gorillas and lions are way bigger than leopards.
Okay but how many punches would it take to kill the Rhino?
2000 to 4000
Light work.
There should unironically be a normie genocide