the cognitive dissonance is the same as when arguing with homosexuals who think derek chauvin did anything wrong because it's the same homosexuals with the same mindset
some animals gotta die because they can't live peacefully alongside us
tigers in the sundurbans gotta go extinct too, every day the WWF and greenpeace bribe indian game wardens to ignore missing persons reports in the sundurbans is a day that poachers selling wiener powder to chinks keep the moral high ground
true conservation can only happen when we all accept that some animals are not meant to live (pandas) and put efforts into pursuits of real value (red pandas)
dollar store tasers can't stop crackheads and you think you're gonna survive pulling that out on a bear or mountain lion?
get bear mace instead, a deterrent is going to work better than something with the relative stopping power of licking a battery to an animal as heavily insulated by fat as a grizzly on its bulk
or better yet they have this fantastic thing you might have heard of, got invented some time around the 14th century
a gun
> or better yet they have this fantastic thing you might have heard of, got invented some time around the 14th century >a gun
The whole point of this thread is to point out that zoo animals don’t necessarily need to be shot when someone falls into their enclosure.
dollar store tasers cant stop crackheads and you think you're gonna survive pulling that out on a gorilla?
the kid is potentially dead in all cases where you try non-lethal first
>the kid is potentially dead in all cases where you try non-lethal first
Have you heard of Binta Jua? She’s a gorilla who was tranquilized when a boy fell into her enclosure. The boy got out alive.
>female animal tries to nurture child and gets tranqd >male animal makes dominance and aggression displays with a child and gets shot
damn.... that's crazy..........
You'd need to get close to the animal to hit it with that thing. What's the max reliable range?
Tasers don't even work 100% of the time on people, I'm not sure I would trust it to connect with the gorilla through all of its fur. What happens if you get a bad shot and the gorilla gets mad and peels the kid like a banana?
The thing in OP looks barely any different to your average "non-wildlife" taser, and those are prone to failure against humans, what the frick do you think it's gonna do against a 200 kilo gorilla?
yeah go ahead and do this to a fricking pissed off silverback who is already 2 seconds and one tantrum away from literally tearing a child apart, see what happens.
>taking a picture of random things with your iphone
What are you supposed to take pictures with, your dick? You're mad that people take pictures? You don't want pictures on an IMAGEBOARD? The frick do you want?
the cognitive dissonance is the same as when arguing with homosexuals who think derek chauvin did anything wrong because it's the same homosexuals with the same mindset
some animals gotta die because they can't live peacefully alongside us
tigers in the sundurbans gotta go extinct too, every day the WWF and greenpeace bribe indian game wardens to ignore missing persons reports in the sundurbans is a day that poachers selling wiener powder to chinks keep the moral high ground
true conservation can only happen when we all accept that some animals are not meant to live (pandas) and put efforts into pursuits of real value (red pandas)
if I could go back in time I would shoot harambe before the niglet ever climbed in the enclosure so he never became a meme
dollar store tasers can't stop crackheads and you think you're gonna survive pulling that out on a bear or mountain lion?
get bear mace instead, a deterrent is going to work better than something with the relative stopping power of licking a battery to an animal as heavily insulated by fat as a grizzly on its bulk
or better yet they have this fantastic thing you might have heard of, got invented some time around the 14th century
a gun
> or better yet they have this fantastic thing you might have heard of, got invented some time around the 14th century
>a gun
The whole point of this thread is to point out that zoo animals don’t necessarily need to be shot when someone falls into their enclosure.
dollar store tasers cant stop crackheads and you think you're gonna survive pulling that out on a gorilla?
the kid is potentially dead in all cases where you try non-lethal first
get real
>the kid is potentially dead in all cases where you try non-lethal first
Have you heard of Binta Jua? She’s a gorilla who was tranquilized when a boy fell into her enclosure. The boy got out alive.
>female animal tries to nurture child and gets tranqd
>male animal makes dominance and aggression displays with a child and gets shot
damn.... that's crazy..........
Tasers fail on humans. why the frick would they use them on a potentially quarter ton predator?
>1 shot
>big huge bear charging you down
>miss/don't connect properly
>get gaped by the bear
I mean for situations like the one in this article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harambe
You'd need to get close to the animal to hit it with that thing. What's the max reliable range?
Tasers don't even work 100% of the time on people, I'm not sure I would trust it to connect with the gorilla through all of its fur. What happens if you get a bad shot and the gorilla gets mad and peels the kid like a banana?
The thing in OP looks barely any different to your average "non-wildlife" taser, and those are prone to failure against humans, what the frick do you think it's gonna do against a 200 kilo gorilla?
yeah go ahead and do this to a fricking pissed off silverback who is already 2 seconds and one tantrum away from literally tearing a child apart, see what happens.
Wouldn't a taser strong enough to knock out a gorilla kill the kid sitting in the water next to him?
No. Tasers don't shoot live to ground, they shoot current from one dart to the other. Which is why you need to be hit by both darts.
zoomBlack person
>he doesn't have a camera in one of his eye sockets
pleb
NOT AGAIN
>redditors immediately run a joke into the ground
it's time to stop
admit it, you look like a moron taking a picture of random things with your iphone
>taking a picture of random things with your iphone
What are you supposed to take pictures with, your dick? You're mad that people take pictures? You don't want pictures on an IMAGEBOARD? The frick do you want?
>The frick do you want?
Anon wants the part you edited out - that you look stupid doing it.
Jokes being run into the ground? The internet would never do that.