Why should we consider (actually, we shouldn't at all)

the "JUST LIKE REAL ANIMALS" opinion from some onions trannies who never went beyond a vape shop in their neighborhood and saw these "REAL ANIMALS" only in Disney cartoons?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 11 months ago
    sage

    [...]

    alright keep bumping it and it will reach bump limit

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Suits me. Never forget, lurkers. Trannies ARE the reason dinosaurs are so fricked up in the modern age. It's not a meme. It's not false. It is LITERALLY what is happening.

  2. 12 months ago
    Sage

    god damnit this shitty thread almost died and you bumped it

  3. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    someone posted a link to this thread in that soijak dot party website.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      what's that? does that explain why this thread sucks so much?

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        It sucks because you're a troony and people noticed.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's a zoomer board named after the most cancer zoomer antimeme that ever zoomed. What do you think?

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          In English please.

  4. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    It might be time for jannies to delete this thread. There's no way to fix it at this point.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Well, considering all the jannies are trannies, the only cure is to delete all the cansured up blue boards. Every single one has been unusable for years due to all the reddit trannies.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        tsmt

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          all me btw

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            Think you'd get the hint after a while

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      just don't look at it if you don't like it

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        frick you i do what i want

  5. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wauf - History & Humanities

  6. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >le thinly veiled /misc/ thread
    You didn't even know about the filters, tourist
    have a nice day
    Never make a thread again
    No one gives a shit about your schizo troony rambling

  7. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    So does the paleoschizo just throw conspiracy targets at the wall to see what sticks?
    Because, you know, conflating chinese villagers with a CCP plot to subvert paleontology with magical devices that can change rock at the atomic level is the height of sane and rational thinking.
    Or how about the one about how the twitter artists with no credentials beyond having a hobby are evidence that transsexual activists have infiltrated the field of paleontology so deeply that they're manipulating the results of digs and studies so that one person specifically questions his sexuality and masculinity every time he thinks about extinct lizards.
    Or the one about the israelites for some reason, because every conspiracy theorist for some reason always comes back around to believing rhetoric straight out of 30's Germany and applies it to their niche topic no matter how little sense it makes.
    No, it couldn't possibly be that all of those are ridiculous conspiracy theories made as cope due to modern evidence showing these animals as different than they were depicted in a 30 year old action movie. A film that goes out of its way to tell the audience that the animals it's depicting are genetic monstrosities due to the company in the film cutting corners.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      He's just trolling.

      if he constantly says stupid stuff about dinosaurs on purpose, he can hide it when he says stupid stuff by accident. Both from others and himself.

      >I was just pretending to be moronic, huh mom?
      he's really a sad sort of person, but I doubt he believes a tenth of the crap he posts.

  8. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    beeg chiken

  9. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Why should we consider (actually, we shouldn't at all)
    parenthetical asides to the inner monologue are cringe and schizo.

    you can't even complete a full thought without having to correct yourself. Like a fricking toddler.

  10. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Trannies b like:

    >just like me!
    >SO misunderstood
    >SO weird
    >SO not like the others

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Shills will try to claim this is a strawman, but it's literally actual fricking trannies pushing all this feathershit and nugay paleo pseudoscience.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        You'd probably be horrified to learn how many of your favorite dinosaurs from the 1800's to now were discovered and described by gay men, many of them transvestites.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          Listen you homosexual. I'm a gay man. And you're by FAR a huger homosexual than I will ever be.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            yes, reading books is bad!

            it's gay to know things!

            you suck wieners and take dicks up your ass, the only difference between you and a troony is you lack fashion sense.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        Loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        Oh also, literal furgays.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        yes, damn those trannies and their purposefully unique cartoon dinosaurs. They should only make cartoon dinosaurs that fit within your rigid preconceived notions of what dinosaurs looked like, as taught to you by verified heterosexual men from the 1940's. Men who certainly never sucked wieners or wore women's underwear to work.

        https://i.imgur.com/dl0Rz3V.jpg

        You'd probably be horrified to learn how many of your favorite dinosaurs from the 1800's to now were discovered and described by gay men, many of them transvestites.

        Listen you homosexual. I'm a gay man. And you're by FAR a huger homosexual than I will ever be.

        https://i.imgur.com/M4bTWVS.jpg

        It's nothing new.

        Not everyone is a troony, but dinosaur paleontology has had far more trannies than you know of.

        yes, reading books is bad!

        it's gay to know things!

        you suck wieners and take dicks up your ass, the only difference between you and a troony is you lack fashion sense.

        God. Why only homosexuals live on this site? Where have all the normal people gone?
        *Btw, Wauf jenny is the main homosexual.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          >saying gay people exist and some of them study dinosaurs makes me gay
          in reality that massive wienersucker, the paleoschizo is quite right. Dinosaur science has a very long history of attracting far more literal gays than exist in the normal population. And the normal population has no shortage of gays.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          As to why you'll find so many gay men working in restaurants, hair salons, engineering departments, and paleontology labs,
          I wouldn't know.

          but you do find them there, that's a fact

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            Dinosaurs are fabulous.

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              It's the feathers and bright colors. Also sparkles

              we need more dinosaur musicals. Then OP can complain the costumes aren't accurate.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                No. Featherhomosexualry is a troony obsession. Transgender is a sex fetish, not a sexuality.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I'm the real gay, all these other gays don't count
                No True homosexual fallacy

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Trannies aren't gay. They're just coombrains.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                you're offended that other men suck wieners for different reasons than you suck wieners, and don't want to be lumped in with them.

                sorry homosexual, you don't get to decide who's included in your exclusive homosexual club.
                you're all a bunch of disgusting homosexuals, you're no better than they are.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Homosexuality is being attracted to the same sex.

                Transgender is watching degenerate porn, crossdressing badly and trying to rape girls in high school locker rooms.

                They're not the same.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >They're not the same.
                >burglars aren't real criminals because they don't kill people

                again, No True homosexual fallacy

                you may think you're different from a troony
                nobody else does.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Be quiet, troony. Although I do believe we've found out why paleopseud is such an isnufferable israelite.

                Literal troony. What a surprise. The reddit paleontologist that thinks deviantart is science is yet another troony. Who could have guessed?

                Eventually people are going to figure out that literally ALL paleohomosexuals that insist on gory, feathered dinosaurs are just trannies working out their mental issues in visual media.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The reddit paleontologist that thinks deviantart is science is yet another troony
                I'm not a homosexual. I'm just explaining to you that since you're a homosexual, you get lumped in with other homosexuals like trannies, twinks, and HR workers.

                Paleontologists don't copy reddit or deviantart, it's the other way around. So yeah, I agree with what they say because they learned it from me.

                Just like I agree with your moronic ass most of the time because everything you know about dinosaurs you learned from me.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >and trying to rape girls in high school locker rooms
                Any actual evidence of this?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Uh yeah, like every fricking autogynephile in existence. In fact, trannies are guilty of felony level crimes so frequently they probably have the highest violent crime rate of any demographic. Little secret most people don't know too: most animal gore videos online are trannies. Most people are totally oblivious to this, but that's why there's so much genital mutilation going on in the vids.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I think you're confusing Trans people with US Republicans again.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Am I?

                We can do this all day. Trannies LOVE to commit crime and have provided endless fodder. For your next trick you'll ask (facetiously) why I have these on my computer, as if you don't know.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >October 2017
                Buddy like fifteen staunch conservatives got put away for bad touch just in the last week

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Record time with the goalposts game.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >"conservative" population: ~50%

                >LGBTROFLMAO and "non-binary" population: <8%

                >troon population: <0.5%

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I see even this board needs a refresher on kindergarten math. My gentle moron let us say you've got ten apples, and one of them is rotten. That means 10% of your apples are rotten. Now let's imagine that you have 100 apples! Wow! But oh no ten of your apples are rotten. That means 10% of your apples are rotten. Now furrow your precious ape like brow and think real hard about this. In both groups 10% of the apples were rotten... Which group had the MOST rotten apples?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                What a moronic thing to say.

                Let's say we have 10 diseases, but 9 of them have 3 percent mortality, but one of them has 85% mortality. The 10 diseases combined have 10% more total fatalities than the 1 with 85% mortality. Which disease should we worry about?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                *The 9 other diseases combined have 10% more total fatalities than the 1 with 85% mortality

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Depends on how common and infectious each disease is moron.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                No it doesn't, dipshit. Honestly, every time trannies come up on a blue board it just proves that trannies are the ones specifically fricking up all the blue boards with their redditry.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                You are the one who brought up Trans people. Just like you do on every board, and then you b***h and moan about how de evil twannies is fowcing you to be gay, because you have fricking brain damage.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                No, troony, your kind just won't stop cancering up the entire internet. Literally go the frick away and we'll forget you perverts that day.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                troon hands wrote this

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I think this thread finally put to rest any doubt: anyone that has ever typed "Why do you bring up trannies all the time? Why do you care?" is literally a troony. It's always been trannies. Years ago, Wauf was lousy with the parasites and created /tttt/ as a containment board. But then that shit got mainstreamed and they took over all the blue boards.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                rent free

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                i look like this and also say this

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                What is this even supposed to mean? Media Matters is run by troony pedophiles btw.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I think this thread finally put to rest any doubt
                We knew that like 5 years ago kek
                The only people who defend trannies online are actual soi redditors and trannies. Redditors are scared of Wauf, so the only people who are going to defend trannies there are the troons themselves

                https://i.imgur.com/VUAXUqb.png

                Completely brain frazzled by two words and a picture, amazing

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                seriously, who are you quoting?
                provide a link or i'll have to assume you're just making this up

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                What the frick are you talking about

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                If trans women are women, why do they have to be called trans?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Tsmt look what they did to /qa/ this website is run by troons

                i look like this and also say this

                What is this even supposed to mean? Media Matters is run by troony pedophiles btw.

                I think this thread finally put to rest any doubt: anyone that has ever typed "Why do you bring up trannies all the time? Why do you care?" is literally a troony. It's always been trannies. Years ago, Wauf was lousy with the parasites and created /tttt/ as a containment board. But then that shit got mainstreamed and they took over all the blue boards.

                Strange, I just went through the wikipedia page about dinosaurs and there doesn't seem to be a single mention of trannies.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                who are you quoting

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >and now we see the subdominant male realize it's female disguise has been discovered
                >knowing it will now be ousted by the rest of the group, it makes an attempt at damage control... to little success

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Tsmt look what they did to /qa/ this website is run by troons

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I think this thread finally put to rest any doubt
                We knew that like 5 years ago kek
                The only people who defend trannies online are actual soi redditors and trannies. Redditors are scared of Wauf, so the only people who are going to defend trannies there are the troons themselves

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                *The 9 other diseases combined have 10% more total fatalities than the 1 with 85% mortality

                ok but im still not getting the jab

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Lol GOOD. Let the trannies die of myocarditis or suicide. I don't give a frick either way.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                What kind of analogy is this?

                Would you buy apples from a grocery that has 85% rotten apples just because the total amount of rotten apples of a reputable supermarket chain has is bigger?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                You moronic coombrain crossdresser, you just used MY argument and argued against your own.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >you're offended that other men suck wieners for different reasons than you suck wieners
                Both are fricked in the head but at least the regular homosexual isn't irrational enough to think he can be female in spite of his chromosomes and then have the audacity to call people who disagree with him "science deniers".

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        Who is that?

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      yes, damn those trannies and their purposefully unique cartoon dinosaurs. They should only make cartoon dinosaurs that fit within your rigid preconceived notions of what dinosaurs looked like, as taught to you by verified heterosexual men from the 1940's. Men who certainly never sucked wieners or wore women's underwear to work.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        Oh boy the constant troony refrain:

        >Um actually, everyone is a secret troony!

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's nothing new.

          Not everyone is a troony, but dinosaur paleontology has had far more trannies than you know of.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            >filename
            I thought trannies were supposed to still be at least human.

  11. 12 months ago
    Anonymous
  12. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >all of these atheist freaks who think dinosaurs are real

    Return to God. Reject Satan.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      return to odin
      reject zeus

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Normally I'd interpret this as a shitpost but someone paid real money for ads about this crap

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        Praise be, commander anon. God's light shines upon us all.

        Wauf will be the epicenter of the christian revolution that will save America from decay

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          doggays, lads, ye gone too far with that reference.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's why I'm fixing hell to make it eternal.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        So the Bible itself is lies, since it describes in detail what happens to creation in the book of Revelation.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          historically christians haven't really accepted Revelation as canon. Its inclusion in the bibble is still questioned and questionable.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yet they still use it as the central core of their recruitment and indoctrination. Especially the more fringe sects of Christianity like Fundamentalists.

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              yep. It's pretty popular with the doomhogs. Real christians who don't want their enemies punished would quickly see it's not christian though.

              but then real christians should have a problem with Saul's writings as well

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          The old testament is littered with ancient shreds of rabbinical apocrypha.

          The new testament has entire books of roman apocrypha giving entirely different accounts of events and putting forth "i heard it from a friend of a friend of jesus that it came to him in a dream" tier shit that changes the religion to be very convenient for roman commoners who are going to be required to adopt it. Then they go where they couldn't get away with changing the book, and read new meanings into it to eliminate the traces of animism in the old testament, and allow roman paganism.

          Christianity is the world's most blatantly made up religion. At least mormonism and islam came from real schizophrenic delusions and not scheming in the church,

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Christianity is the world's most blatantly made up religion

            It's surprising more people don't realize this, with how it takes things from a bunch of other religions and barely edits them.

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              Humans have defective brains.

  13. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why, of all boards on Wauf, is the animal board the most mentally ill?
    No easy task either, at that.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Animals can be a substitute for people.
      But in this context it's because liking dinosaurs is closely linked with autism and childhood.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        I always read the "liking dinosaurs is autistic" thing here and it's never been convincing. I think it's all coming from self-hating nerdy dino fans who got picked on for liking them as a kid. I'm a total normie/chad (at least appearance wise) and I've always loved dinos, they're just animals. (excuse me, REAL ANIMALS™) Are there autists who like them? Sure. But there are autists out there who like everything.
        But the level of mental illness on this board... this isn't normal. And it can't be explained away with garden variety autism either. Posters impersonating each other, claiming to be one another, accusing others of being someone else, threatening to make housecalls to beat each other up. No there's something stranger going on here. And that's just the paleo threads, not even getting into the people who want to frick dolphins and birds.
        The only board that comes close is the pro wrestling board. /x/ is actually normie central compared to these two boards.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Posters impersonating each other, claiming to be one another, accusing others of being someone else
          isn't that just an inevitable symptom of Wauf's anonymous system
          >not even getting into the people who want to frick dolphins and birds
          That's like asking why the lgbt board has so many gays and trannies, or why Wauf faps to cartoons. Every board has coomers

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            >isn't that just an inevitable symptom of Wauf's anonymous system
            Yes.

            on Wauf I'm big bob
            but there's at least a dozen other big bobs there. I got a whole team of trolls copying me.

            same with the paleoschizo. Doesn't matter how many people he is. If a person constantly gets mistake for him, they are him. Anonymous isn't just one person.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            >isn't that just an inevitable symptom of Wauf's anonymous system
            Basically yeah, but the real answer is that the blue boards are ALWAYS the worst because they attract all the liberal Black folk and moronic midwits afraid of racial slurs. Which also means they have 100% subverted "minds" already and want to spread the mental disease to others. When you defy them with the light of truth, they wriggle and scream and burst into flames. That's what you're witnessing. Some people really ARE that autistic and won't stand for israelite astroturfing campaigns. This causes violent reactions in propagandists.

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              What if you're the mentally ill one?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                You dumb b***h, see:

                Biologists are all mentally ill. But most of them are mentally ill AND midwit redditors.

                t. biologist

                We're all mentally ill. I'm just mentally ill and not moronic.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                schizo still pretending to be a biologist even if he doesn't know shit about biology
                sad

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          Why do so many members of the population fall for astroturf campaigns. It's literally just fricking shills. It's malice and they're paid to do it. NEVER expect good faith arguments in 2023. We've reached full corporate Third Body Problem levels of botmind.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            Oh I haven't fallen for it. I give them the chance to come clean while knowing full well they won't take it, basically to watch them squirm as you said. If this thread has taught us anything it's that you were right about these people paleo-schizo. You were right about about everything. And now of course they'll accuse me of being you again.

            >isn't that just an inevitable symptom of Wauf's anonymous system
            Basically yeah, but the real answer is that the blue boards are ALWAYS the worst because they attract all the liberal Black folk and moronic midwits afraid of racial slurs. Which also means they have 100% subverted "minds" already and want to spread the mental disease to others. When you defy them with the light of truth, they wriggle and scream and burst into flames. That's what you're witnessing. Some people really ARE that autistic and won't stand for israelite astroturfing campaigns. This causes violent reactions in propagandists.

            >Some people really ARE that autistic and won't stand for israelite astroturfing campaigns
            Well, almost everything. Because I don't think there's anything autistic about it. It's merely standing up to calculated misinformation, which is basically evil in my eyes.

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              You kind of have to be slightly autistic to care this much about it. And while not technically autistic, you would be forgiven for thinking I am.

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              And yes, it's not basically evil. It's just evil. The demons in control of this world have worked very hard to try to erase "evil" from the vocabulary of the homunculi masquerading as human in this age, which allows them to get away with literally level of it not seen in the entirety of human history.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The demons in control
                meds you fricking nut

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Evil must and shall be destroyed.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Start with yourself.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not evil. I'm starting with you. I'm ending with your evil god.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Biologists are all mentally ill. But most of them are mentally ill AND midwit redditors.

      t. biologist

  14. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like dinosaurs, I like shows about dinosaurs, dinosaurs are neat, trans rights are human rights and I don't mind the paleo schizo.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      >This is the most delicious pizza ever baked. With broken glass in it.
      I like your style, pscyho.

  15. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm glad this show exists. Not just because it's a fairly good but somewhat flawed attempt to emulate modern nature docuseries like Planet Earth, but because it make's Wauf's resident paleoschizo seethe like nothing else.
    Imagine being so obsessed with your Jurassic Park inspired headcanon that when a new series contradicts the scientific accuracy of a 30 year old film you throw apoplectic tantrums on Wauf.

  16. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    They should be like real animals because they WERE real animals you fricking idiot. If that weren't the case then they would just make a documentary on creaters from the dungeons and dragons monster manuel

  17. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hey I said onions not onions

  18. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    I watched through the series for the first time a few days ago. The intro really gripped me, I thought I was gonna relive the level of fascination I felt during my childhood because the models had so much fidelity. They were so impressive, and Beelzebufo especially looked so real in its rendering and animation. I got really invested in the behaviours and livelihoods of the creatures, but every time the tension seemed to rise and capture an immersive view of prehistoric life, it'd dissipate usually from the series' heavy aversion to behavioural and physical violence and suffering, and by the fifth episode the awe had worn off and some segments felt tonally repetitive, and worse yet, sort of artificial in its portrayal of nature. Realistically, I know that nothing with the brutality of Walking with Dinosaurs will ever be funded and produced today with this level of quality, and I very much enjoyed seeing the more whimsical aspects of animal behaviour, but I wish this series could have been a combination of the two, a portal into both dualities. In my opinion that would've made it something unforgettable for kids to experience.

  19. 12 months ago
    basil

    what the frick are you talking about

  20. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Didneydrones have no critical thought capabilities, merely consooming whatever the Mouse sharts onto their plate and proclaiming it gospel.

  21. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Feathered dinosaurs are the last bastion of heterosexuality in this increasingly perverted world

    OP just hates it because he wants "big beefy t rex daddies UwU" but us straight aryan chads who have no reason to fear turning into trannies (unlike OP, who has "been the girl" so many times he's starting to have intrusive thoughts) want the opposite. More feathers, and give them lips too.

  22. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why does literally every thread on every board now have to mention trannies

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      well the board is overrun with low iq types that think they're being rebellious and edgy defying the progressive agenda when in reality they're just extreme rule-followers doing whatever they're told in sunday school by Pastor Dave Bumhumper.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >conflating religiosity with their "alt right" boogeyman
        The unintentional irony and lack of self-awareness is palpable despite being extremely predictable.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      CIA is using trannies everywhere to upset the societal applecart so people don't talk about killing populations for making rents universally above income. Everyone HATES trannies, but libs MUST defend the most loathsome, so it's the perfect non-controversy. Hope this helps.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >kookoo_clock_soundeffect.wav

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          Bruh it's 2023. There's no such thing as paranoia. The feds are out to get everyone and they're doing a great job of wrecking society.

  23. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    This post is completely unintelligible. Could you try again, but with human words and phrases?

  24. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    I thought the "woke T-rex" shit was a meme

    Kek

  25. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is this thread AI generated or what? I have no idea what the frick you're talking about

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Just because you're stupid, doesn't mean it's fake.

  26. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >dinosaur documentary depicts prehistoric animals doing things other than fighting and hunting and eating each other
    >ITS SUBVERSIVE troony WOKE AGENDA AND NOT SCIENTIFIC!
    I hate brainrotted stormgays, I really do, these Black folk were never /misc/, they're just salty womanish morons that whine about everything

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Dare, I say, these are even like Real Animals™??

  27. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    At least raptors are drawn quite neat. The problem is that it's impossible to watch, since each scene literally drags on for an eternity but has no content (fricking hack Favreau).
    It also pisses me off that onions autists are constantly comparing this shit to Jurassic World, which even compared to the old Jurassic Park (still pretty realistic, btw) is absolute trash fantasy crap with xenomorphs instead of dinosaurs.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, it is shockingly boring for a dinosaur documentary. Honestly i don't feel anything when watching these clips, why there isn't any background dinosaurs? It is just empty landscapes with 3D models, they looks nice but it isn't believable because the action is always centered on a couple of animals and everything around them is lifeless.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's called:
        >aRTisTiC VisiON
        It's just that nowadays every assembly line movie director, whose greatest achievement at best was to direct some slop #3845 for Disney, consider themselves to be the next Scorsese or Kubrick... Making a "documentary"... Yeah.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      wtf I didn't say onions I said onions

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        it's a word filter so we can laugh at reddit homosexuals like you and OP

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          cope seethe and dilate

  28. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Everything was alright until the goddamn Mononykus appreared.

    >this animal has the same colour and pattern like a animal that hasnt even evolved yet hurr durr

    Its ok when you do shit like this as a skin JWE or those Beast of the mesozoic toyline or some shit. But not in a fricking documentary. Frick paleogays, frick them.

  29. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    what the frick is wrong with dinogays?

  30. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >some manchild who never quite grew out of his dinosaur phase spouting barely comprehensible horseshit about 'onions trannies' who 'never went beyond a vape shop' because the dinosaur CGI didn't look quite like the rubber dinosaur toys he had as a child
    the absolute state of this board, man

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's unironically sad at this point.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        the creators are open leftists what's your point?

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Perspicacious and succinct.

  31. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Science stops becoming science the moment biases are presented, in which case it becomes media instead of science.
    It’s great that Prehistoric Planet tried (emphasis on tried) its best to depict dinosaurs using the most up-to-date data that we have today when it’s present. However, it clearly doubled down on this and made it a point to depict the dinosaur using the most popular rhetoric narrative of [current year], otherwise we won’t be presented with this much “subversive speculations”.
    Which is sad, because it’s worshipped by the I LOVE SCIENCE crowd so much as the most accurate dinosaur documentary ever just because the series supports their pet theories.
    They don’t love science, they put science on a pedestal and idolize their own personal image of what science should be, and then becomes toxic after getting disappointed when the real science doesn’t fit their personal image.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      >depict the dinosaur using the most popular rhetoric narrative of [current year]
      how?

      >“subversive speculations”
      how any of those were subversive ?

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      PP doesn't subvert out of malice or whatever, it's simply the culmination of the All Yesterdays movement which tried to show dinosaurs in a newer light beyond the usual and trite
      >hunt hunt hunt
      >migration
      >extinction
      Sometimes it gets a bit silly and unnecessarily weird, but it's nice to see dinosaurs portrayed as real animals doing animals things, even if weird and speculative.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        It is malice.
        You don't have plausible deniability.
        Society rewards morons for acting out and claiming new and improved stupid shit.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >it's simply the culmination of the All Yesterdays movement
        Oh great, so not subversion out of malice but just subversion for subversion's sake then. That's really not any better and the All Yesterdays "movement" is pure cancer.
        >but it's nice to see dinosaurs portrayed as real animals doing animals things
        Real animals also hunt and migrate though. It's not some fabrication that was first made up for dino documentaries, they actually do those things. So even the "real animals!" company line is disingenuous.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          No there's plenty of malice inherent in contrarianism.

  32. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Honest question, OP.
    Why haven't you killed yourself yet?
    We're all eagerly waiting for the obituary.

  33. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's been nearly one year and you in particular are still mad over a speculative disney movie

    PROTIP: You associate it with homosexualitys and transvestism because seeing the world as trying to turn people trans is a common paranoid delusion in repressing trannies.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      What made you gay? And why are you so hellbent on inflicting a homosexual agenda on the rest of us? Can we talk about that?

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        You know it’s weird you’ve got such a problem with the gays despite being a massive homosexual

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Black person you literally organize harassment campaigns against half-moronic hapa vtubers solely for the transgression of playing a wizard game for toddlers you deemed "literally genocide". You are in no position to speak about mental health, even less so paranoia.

  34. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    wtf i didn't type onions i typed onions

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, onions/onions is filtered to onions

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      The substance that starts with an “S”that’s commonly associated ”O”nline with estrogen production and other similar stereotypes that “Y”ou may know of is censored to onions. It isn’t censored on boards like Wauf though since it could potentially mess up cooking recipes.

  35. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Noone should ever listen to anyone with a STEM degree. They are almost singlehandedly responsible for the death of the environmental movement, reddit, the idea that everyone needs a degree to get a job (and the consequent debt everyone is now saddled with) and the death of critical thinking and science itself in this age. As has been elaborated on at length many times, the only thing STEMgays are any good at is math. Everything else is trained monkey tier. A factory worker that watches Youtube videos will typically know more about a subject than some moron with a degree in it.

  36. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    I’m so glad they made this show for no reason other than watching you seethe uncontrollably months after it finished and everyone forgot about it

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Season 2 starts in a couple months.

  37. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    I’ve never heard of this “just like real animals” argument before. Could you elaborate on what you’re speaking of? I just don’t understand what this means.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Schizo speed for
      >not like in jurassic park

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ah, so it’s like “dinosaurs had feathers” and shit like that? ty for responding

        https://i.imgur.com/Lqx3BEC.jpg

        >never heard of this
        Sure. Just like no russkie has ever heard of "two more weeks" or "Kyiv in three days", kek.

        Legit never heard of the phrase prior to this thread.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          I envy you since you clearly haven’t seen much of the dogshit that is Wauf dino threads

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        Jurassic Park's actually pretty accurate. And the only parts that aren't are known speculation. That's the difference between JP and PP. JP knows it's fiction. But the advisors on that movie actually tried for accuracy (mostly). The advisors for PP ACTIVELY pushed speculative fictitious nonsense and tried to pass it off as fact.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Jurassic Park's actually pretty accurate. And the only parts that aren't are known speculation
          It’s funny you still think that

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          You Chomosexual homie they literally ruined Dilophosaurus reputation in media. They literally knew how large it actually was but they still went to straight up lies path way and made it a poisonous iguana. Even the novels were more accurate than the movie version.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            You don't even understand why Crichton did that. You think it's because he wanted a scary monster and didn't trust the experts, but his entire point with that deviation from conventional paleontology was that the operators of the Park were playing with fire and didn't actually know for certain what they were getting. They expected a relatively safe small carnivore to wow the guests, but instead they got an exhibit that was nocturnal, evasive, and dangerous to staff and guests alike.

            JP is literature. Not high literature, but still literature. It had a point to make.

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              It's kind of absurd how many times I've explained this shit to these CIA redditor homosexuals. They just don't care. They're philosophical zombies. You're not arguing with people here. They're simply cogs pushing an agenda. They don't even understand what they're saying. They just type shit.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >You're not arguing with people here. They're simply cogs pushing an agenda. They don't even understand what they're saying. They just type shit.
                says the guy that literally can't understand anything people type.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          Why did they mix them with frog DNA? at that tike they knew dinosaurs were closer to birds than reptiles, and especially amphibians. They're theme park attrations and nothing more

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            So they would be dumb and scaly instead of gay and feathered like giant chickens

            Even the JP guys knew that they were just like real animals

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              >at that tike they knew dinosaurs were closer to birds than reptiles
              that wasn't a popular idea at the time the book was written. And the movie didn't try to correct mistakes in the book.
              "Velociraptor antirrhopus" is a famous one they knew was wrong and left in anyways.

              I mean yeah, ingen overlooking IRL facts is basically canon. i just always assumed that they made them look like classic reptilian dinosaurs purely just out of marketability. Forg seems weird cause they breathe out of their skin.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Parts of frog DNA moron.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                the way I remember it, when the book came out everyone knew birds descended from dinosaurs but nobody seriously expected to find feathered dinosaurs. When feathered dinosaurs were found, scientists still didn't believe it. It was just a bit too convenient to seem true.

                so basically, scaley was the expected look at the time. Kids forget the idea of feathered dinosaurs is extremely new for the general public and even for most scientists.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >the idea of feathered dinosaurs is extremely new for the general public and even for most scientists.
                like newer than Jurassic Park.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            >at that tike they knew dinosaurs were closer to birds than reptiles
            that wasn't a popular idea at the time the book was written. And the movie didn't try to correct mistakes in the book.
            "Velociraptor antirrhopus" is a famous one they knew was wrong and left in anyways.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Jurassic Park's actually pretty accurate
          This, especially the frilled venom-spitting Dilophosaurus, the real animal was exactly like this but those woke scientists hide the parts of the fossils that show it had a frill and venom glands. We all know sauropods chewed their food like cattle as well, but again the woke scientists brainwashed us into believing they couldn't use their mouths. And lying so hard about Velociraptor, it was the baddest smartest most amazing hunter to ever live, if it was alive today humanity would be extinct in months.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      >never heard of this
      Sure. Just like no russkie has ever heard of "two more weeks" or "Kyiv in three days", kek.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >He doesn't date Prego women so you can frick them without a condom and drink milk and then ghost them

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          breast milk is toxic for non-infants

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            So I can do all that and die?? Sign me the frick up

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >it's a paleoschizo thread

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        Is that the Overly Attached Girlfriend?

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        What a shitty 'shop, lol
        People mad about CGI feathers or whatever on dinos should be outraged at the sloopy shooping going on here
        But no, everyone here has a massive boner for cuck shit, so everyone will believe it's real out of pure hate

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Some people think that 'scary' looking animals like crocodiles are movie monsters and not real animals. So if someone portrays T rex for example as scary-looking then it means they are portraying the T rex as a movie monster. Pretty common in the dinosaur threads. All dinosaur threads are cancer.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/t9plV6P.jpg

        Modern pc "culture" now extends to animals too, so dinosaurs should now look friendly. A crocodile biting off a zebra's head is NOT pc, for example.

        Demolition Man (1993) future is already here.

        As someone who is in the middle I wholeheartedly disagree with whoever goes far into their own asses. In other websites people want to IMPLORE that dinosaurs MUST be cute AND friendly and animal like which just gives me a fricking headache to read through. On the other hand we have morons in Wauf who literally argue all day that dinosaurs should be moronic meat sacks with teeth and nothing more.
        Like, in my opinion it's a breath of fresh air. We've seen dinosaurs rampage and maul each other in media for about three decades, most if not always focusing on combat side of things and how they gore each other with their fearsome jaws and claws. Prehistoric Planet still very much gives us a more natural feel to them and don't just focus on predation and combat. However, contrary to some morons in this thread, Prehistoric Planet still very much has a ton of fricking scenes where dinosaurs and other prehistoric reptiles maul each other and kill each other because they're animals you morons.

        A crocodile will fricking rip the face off a zebra but it'll let birds clean it's mouth from left overs because it's not a bloodthirsty moron.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Nice try, Trey
          There are plenty complaints to levy against PP and you can cite direct quotes from the creators for much of it. The only time the show decides to gets gruesome is toward infants, other than that, it tries its best to cut away from bloodshed or violence, except for a funny anime fight between the mosasaurs. The Carno wiggle dance was among one of the most greivous examples of pussyfication. Over all I actually liked it and it's for that reason I care about the flaws so much. This shit was deliberate whereas WWD was dated because of what we knew at the time, we now have idealogues making it dated much like the rest of our media post 2015

          https://i.imgur.com/NyuL558.jpg

          You Chomosexual homie they literally ruined Dilophosaurus reputation in media. They literally knew how large it actually was but they still went to straight up lies path way and made it a poisonous iguana. Even the novels were more accurate than the movie version.

          Get over it, JP did more to cement dinos as fast animals explicitly related to birds more than any other peice of media. Taking liberties with the Dilos and Velociraptors were for the sake of making them iconic and drawing interest, which was better in the long run.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            >The only time the show decides to gets gruesome is toward infants
            It's like baby blue, baby pink and white flag gays cannot for a single moment not shove their child predation habits.

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              It's their antinatalism in general. Lefties are fine with violence towards infants because they don't see them as life. Which is why they shy away from showing kills on adult dinos but graphically depict baby ones they spend time getting you endeared to getting swallowed whole. I know infant mortality was and still is super high, but they could hardly go a scene without it to the point that it made lots of us pick up on it.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            > The Carno wiggle dance was among one of the most greivous examples of pussyfication.
            >Taking liberties with the Dilos and Velociraptors were for the sake of making them iconic and drawing interest, which was better in the long run.

            Oh yeah, making the first apex predator of the jurassic period into a pussified iguana sure has made a good impact in dilo you complete and utter hypocrite.

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              He is not hypocritical, he's pragmatic, in contrast to you leftist purity spiraling ideologues.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Don’t push me with your homosexual ass american political ideologies you mentally destabilized tool. You aren’t capable of bringing an argument into a dinosaur conversation so you resort to fricking politics.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >You aren’t capable of bringing an argument into a dinosaur conversation
                Literally brought photographic evidence you demented autogynephiliac asiatic.

                >Don’t push me with your homosexual ass american political ideologies
                Ironic this coming from a CCP shill pushing demoralization agenda.

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Why, I struck a chord.
              So you're fine with liberties when it's a stupid dance claiming to be fact but not with a fictional movie with an iconic design, got it.

              Something suggests that you’ve only seen youtube clips of prehistoric planet.

              Pirated the whole thing, already said I liked it. What would keep me from watching it, exactly? If any criticism of PP illicits this sort of response from its fandom then thats saying a lot.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >So you're fine with liberties when it's a stupid dance claiming to be fact
                Any of the other scenes would’ve been a better example for you to use. They specifically did the carno dance scene because of its weird arm anatomy that nobody has really thought of a better explanation for than “display maybe?”

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Then pick a different scene. Go ahead, let's hear your criticism. I picked the carno scene because a) it looks stupid and b) it is nonsense because why would display evolve on a vestigial limb the species is actively losing talk about counterintuitive and c) he doesn't even get any carnussy

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >why would display evolve on a vestigial limb the species is actively losing
                Except it’s not actively losing it. All abelisaurs have the same tiny arms across tens of millions of years and the arms don’t get any smaller across that entire time span

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                That logic just doesn't follow. Of course different species would branch off in the time it takes for evolution to get rid of a limb. Limbs are seen across all vertevrates Carno and it's family would have been one of the only examples of this ever. Each species was likely evolving in the same trend and thus the arms were in varying degree of stubbiness across all Abelisaurs which just means they were at different stages in the process of losing them. But they are theropods which means their limbs were bigger at one time. So, their limbs shrank. Period. Display would not evolve for shrinking limbs, especially when they have prominent horns on their brow ridge which along with crests is similar to how 99% of other theropods sexually display.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                The arms shrunk at the early stages of abelisaur evolution, by the time carnotaurus popped up they had long since stopped shrinking. It was not in the process of losing its limbs, they had become small and then maintained that size across all the later Abelisaurs. Regardless of that, calling the arms vestigial despite having a ball and socket joint allowing an enormous range of movement, wearing in said joint suggesting frequent movement and well developed chest and shoulder muscles is a long shot. Compare them to something like emus that do have vestigial forelimbs and don’t have any of that

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's such a simple structure though that I think people are overthinking the arms. Display would call for a more elaborate structure. The chest muscles I would explain away as being necessary for the rest of the animal to function, Carno was quick and probably used it in combination with the rest of it's anatomy to give it better offensive capabilities. I mean, why would big chest muscles even be necessary for wiggling? I can wiggle my pinkie toe for extended periods and I don't need muscles for it. I think the chest muscles are for something else. It's jaw and entire body compostion make me think of it as the bulldog of theropods, at least, how bulldogs used to look back when they were still athletic and fighting bulls. But I will say what you're pushing here is compelling. I just think it's very open to debate and still unclear, thus it shouldn't be pushed like that in a documentary as high profile as this one as if it were settled. Still on the vestigial side of the argument, most seemingly first inclinations in debates such as this tend to be right in the end.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Display would call for a more elaborate structure
                Well ostriches use their wings for display, and they’ve shrunk a shitload compared to their ancestors
                >I just think it's very open to debate and still unclear, thus it shouldn't be pushed like that in a documentary as high profile as this one as if it were settled
                That’s not what they did. In the explanation segment they paired with the episode they explained “something was going on with their arms, and we can’t really think of anything else aside from display so that’s how we interpreted it”

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I would bet you Ostriches lose their wings if given enough time. But just because you CAN find examples of goofy dances doesn't mean you SHOULD infer that example on any particular dino species. If you can do it for carno, you can do it for all of them. And the justification for it in the post doc interview is poor. "We can't think of anything else they would be used for" is shit reasoning.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >But just because you CAN find examples of goofy dances doesn't mean you SHOULD infer that example on any particular dino species
                Why not? How is it any worse than the scene where a T. rex bellows like an alligator? If you don’t want them speculating you’d be left with a 30 minute episode of brown dinosaurs walking

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >you’d be left with a 30 minute episode of brown dinosaurs walking
                if you want to be a purist you'd get 30 minutes of partial decapitated skeletons with broken and twisted bones sitting in a box or on a hillside.

                in real life dinosaurs are pretty boring.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            Something suggests that you’ve only seen youtube clips of prehistoric planet.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            >except for a funny anime fight between the mosasaurs.
            >ignores the nanqsaurus hunting pachyrhinosaurus in a blizzard.
            >ignores the troodontid hunting mammals.
            >ignores the qianzhousaurus hunting corythoraptor.

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              Lol this entire scene is complete fabrication. Dinosaurs weren't trudging through the snow like fricking bison and wolves. And these specific species certainly weren't covered in feathers. TROPICAL PLANET.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                The arctic circle had a temperate climate like modern day New York. It absolutely would have snowed in the winter.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Lol no it fricking did not. New York isn't even "temperate" it's cold as all hell. How are ALL paleontologists so fricking terrible at their jobs??

                >Um actually Canada had the exact same climate 66 million years ago as today

                The frick are all you morons talking about. Read a god damned book already. Jesus christ.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                we can check average temperatures in any sedimentary rock, including in dinosaur bones.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                And guess, what? They weren't what they are fricking now. Average temperatures also don't tell you shit. And many of the methods used to calculate them are bad. HOWEVER, we still know that the Mesozoic was significantly warmer than today, even at its coldest. Only 125k years ago there were jaguars in Canada, but we're supposed to believe 66mya T. rex had to put up with shoveling snow bullshit?

                You are legitimately fricking moronic if you buy this shit.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                anon said THE ARCTIC CIRCLE was temperate

                that's a lot warmer than today

                read before you rage

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >many of the methods used to calculate them are bad.
                how many methods do you think there are?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                There's the method of using mollusk shells, there's the the method of using paleobotanical data, there's the method of using microscopic ocean life, etc. There's a lot of fricking methods. The mollusk one, for example, is not great. But we can see the fricking pollen and plants. We know this shit wasn't buried in ice. No ceratopsian had feathers. ZERO. And even the supposed "quills" of Psittacosaurus were likely just plant remains.

                the funny part is paleontologists agree with him, he just read the post wrong.

                No they don't. Every paleomoron and their dog has been trying to hype fuzzy tyrannosaurs for most of my life and when they got owned by T. rex they moved onto "Nanuqtyrannus" (T. rex). It never stops with these homosexuals.

                >waaaaaah why aren't animals like in hollywood where they're spitting acid venom on people's faces and are smarter than humans while also not being able to see anything except when it moves!

                Dare I say these are like real animals?

                [...]
                >Worst part about PP has to be its fans

                You mean the apple shills?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                *Nanuqsaurus

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Show me one. (1) paper that says red had feathers
                You can't. Nobody ever wrote one

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Dare I say these are like real animals?
                You keep saying this, do you think they were plants? You can’t say the “real animals” side is stupid and then turn around and go “uhh well no large animals today have x feature from the show so neither would Dinosaurus inserticus”

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Calling wildly inaccurate fantasy illustrations "real animals" is a knowing propaganda technique. It's lies.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >It's lies.
                you misunderstand the logic is all.

                here's how it goes:
                >we know these animals had organs and behaviors that aren't preserved in the fossil record.
                >Portraying them with invented organs and behaviors is innacurate
                >Portraying them without invented organs and behaviors is EVEN MORE inaccurate

                their mistake was thinking you aren't stupid enough to take the inventions literally.
                they were wrong.

                luckily what morons think about invented organs and behaviors in paleospecies simply doesn't matter. You can go right on raging about your misunderstandings, and the rest of the world will go right on laughing at you.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >here's how it goes:
                >>we know these animals had organs and behaviors that aren't preserved in the fossil record.
                them with invented organs and behaviors is innacurate
                them without invented organs and behaviors is EVEN MORE inaccurate
                >their mistake was thinking you aren't stupid enough to take the inventions literally.
                >they were wrong.
                Funny how the people who say this are also the ones clutching their pearls the hardest when JP gave venom glands to the dilophosaurs.
                The difference of course being Jurassic Park was openly a work of fiction whereas Prehistoric Planet wants viewers to believe this is how these animals REALLY looked and acted because hurr durr who is to say they didn't?" Yet of the two only JP is openly lambasted as peddling inaccurate images of dinos and influencing public perception of them negatively.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Funny how the people who say this are also the ones clutching their pearls the hardest when JP gave venom glands to the dilophosaurs.
                are they?

                i think anyone that gets emotional over the portrayal of cartoon dinosaurs is a moron. Regardless of what inaccuracies trigger them.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >are they?
                You see it even in this thread.
                One of the favorite strawmen from posters here playing devil's advocate for PP (probably unironic shills) is WHAT'S WRONG CHUD ARE OUR DINOSAURS NOT LIKE YOUR CHILDHOOD MOVIE MONSTERS when their precious "documentary" is doing the exact same thing: adding hypothetical features we have zero evidence for. The difference, again, is one trying to pretend this is real and deliberately reshape public opinon on dinosaurs while one is a series of novels and movies openly just for entertainment (and ironically, actually more thought provoking).
                The inflatable sauropod neck balloons belong in the same pile as the venom spitting dilophosaurs.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >You see it even in this thread.
                not if I don't read the thread I don't.
                this bullshit belongs on Wrong board

                >The inflatable sauropod neck balloons belong in the same pile as the venom spitting dilophosaurs.
                yes
                and neither one is something a straight white grown man should ever even spend 5 seconds thinking about.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                All I'm getting from this post is that you'll post in threads you don't actually read, a thread about something you don't care about and thus have no reason to actually be in.
                Sterling contribution.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm the disinterested outsider who can stand back and see how stupid you are, and perhaps how stupid your opponents are.

                you are remarkably stupid.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                The funny thing is I'd still rather talk with my stupid opponents than someone who just comes along to say
                >hurr durr I don't care about any of this even though I've posted about it at least three (3) times and counting now
                But go on, show us all how much you don't care by posting again please.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                they don't want to talk to you.
                everyone who talks to you wants you gone
                not a single person on Wauf wants you here

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Oh? Who am "I"?
                I'm not paleo-schizo you moron, though I love how you've memed yourself into thinking there's only person out there who doesn't like Prehistoric Planet's portrayal.
                I can see he deeply traumatized you with his wrong-think though, but I like him in spite of that. Or rather because of that, so you're wrong about no one wanting him here.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I've had at least 2 anons offer to go to your house and beat the shit out of you if I told them where you live.

                you are roundly hated here.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not the schizo, no one knows who I am or where I live, and I would beat the shit out of every last poster on Wauf if need be. A bunch of progressive dinonerds and/or dogfrickers don't exactly strike fear into my heart, homosexual.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I'm not the schizo,
                sure you are.

                even if you happen to be 2 different people you're the same person here. You're indistinguishable. There is no difference between you and him.

                so in fact you are him. Even if you're not always him. Sometimes I'm him.

                but either way, Wauf absolutely hates you and you should frick off

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Posting while drunk again, old man? How bout some more selfies?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                understand yet?
                paleoschizo lies constantly and says he's not himself. So there's no reason to believe him when he says he's not himself.

                but even if you aren't him, that just means someone else is being hated for your bullshit. Because you are him. And if anyone else agrees with you, they're him too.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're the living incarnation of the dead internet.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >bragging over being reddit cancer

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Just shill talking points. He's paid to care very much.

                Aren't you, you fat little b***h?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Aren't you, you fat little b***h?
                Was meant for:

                I'm the disinterested outsider who can stand back and see how stupid you are, and perhaps how stupid your opponents are.

                you are remarkably stupid.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >are they?
                You are. Literally every thread, israelite.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I understand the motivations and tactics of your kind perfectly. I also understand that gaslighting and the pretention that the only reason anyone would disagree with you is that they're just ignorant is par for the course with you fricking robots.

                >here's how it goes:
                >>we know these animals had organs and behaviors that aren't preserved in the fossil record.
                them with invented organs and behaviors is innacurate
                them without invented organs and behaviors is EVEN MORE inaccurate
                >their mistake was thinking you aren't stupid enough to take the inventions literally.
                >they were wrong.
                Funny how the people who say this are also the ones clutching their pearls the hardest when JP gave venom glands to the dilophosaurs.
                The difference of course being Jurassic Park was openly a work of fiction whereas Prehistoric Planet wants viewers to believe this is how these animals REALLY looked and acted because hurr durr who is to say they didn't?" Yet of the two only JP is openly lambasted as peddling inaccurate images of dinos and influencing public perception of them negatively.

                That's why they're mad. Jurassic Park didn't claim to be a documentary with it's on the nose fictitious additions - quite the opposite in fact. It was a parable about man's hubris. If Dennis Nedry had said "These are like Real Animals!™" right when he saw the Dilophosaurus' frill pop out, they'd be wanking to Jurassic Park as much as they do to brian engh's guroshit.

                It IS subversion.
                That IS the point.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yutyrannus was feathered. If T.rex didn't have feathers because it was too big, then other Yutyrannus-sized Tyrannosaurids were probably feathered. Nanuqsaurus fits that description, and it also happened to have lived in colder environments than its cousins.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yutyrannus is chink bullshit.

                Repeat the line.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >There's the method of using mollusk shells, there's the the method of using paleobotanical data, there's the method of using microscopic ocean life, etc.
                none of those give you an exact temperature except the mollusk shell one because that's oxygen isotopes analysis.

                you don't know shit about climatology. No surprise, you're completely ignorant of paleontology in general.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Okay moron. You keep those Dunning-Kruger engines firing on all cylinders.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                oxygen isotopes analysis is a method of comparing the ratio of O16 isotopes to O18 and then measuring that against a known modern sample.

                since the ratio of the two isotopes varies by temperature we can tell the exact temperature sediments were deposited in by examining the oxygen ratio

                we can also tell what temperature of water mollusks lived in by the oxygen ratio in their shells. Or what temperature dinosaurs lived in by the ratio in their bones and teeth. We can do the same with your bones and teeth too

                it's the only method that gives us an exact temperature of the climate dinosaurs lived in, and it's essentially never wrong.

                you should read up on it, it's very basic stuff. Probably well above your ability to understand, but you should try.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                What

                The Frick

                Did your enter key

                Ever do

                To you?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                go

                back
                to

                r

                e

                d

                d

                i

                t

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I reddit space when talking to morons

                it gives you a little more time between sentences to try to understand them.

                Let me know if it's working.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                everyone seems pretentious when you're a moron

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                The paleoschizo said paleoclimate proxies don't work and it turned out he's never heard of the only one people use.

                be like arguing about which is the best truck and finding out your opponent has never heard of Chevrolet. That's a severe mental deficiency there. Starting arguments on topics you don't even have a child's understanding about. That is an extremely stupid person. Critically, clinically dumb. Like arguing ice cream flavors with someone that's never heard of vanilla. Discussing books with someone who's never heard of Dr. Seuss.

                Like if you're that fricking ignorant, why are you trying to discuss the subject? Just keep your mouth shut and hope nobody realizes you're a fricking moron. That's what a normal person would do.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                You could stop responding to him with hilariously spergy walls of texts about extinct skeletons

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                In addition to reddit spacing, I use repetition with morons.

                I have explained oxygen isotopes analysis as a climate proxy to the paleoschizo at least 10 times now.

                In another 50-100 repetitions he'll not only accept it, but start acting like everyone who isn't familiar with it must be stupid, despite the fact that he only learned of it 5 minutes prior and vehemently denied its existence and utility before that.

                eventually we're going to get him trained to a technical level at which he can have the appearance of meaningful scientific discussion and we're going to set him loose on facebook like a diarrhea filled donut for intellectuals to admire and accidentally bite into.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >eventually we're going to get him trained to a technical level at which he can have the appearance of meaningful scientific discussion and we're going to set him loose on facebook like a diarrhea filled donut
                This will take a long time since he must first learn anatomy.

                Presumably I'll have to first go through each individual bone and landmark, convincing him that
                A. The ulna exists
                B. Dinosaurs had ulnas
                C. The ulna is not a chinese plot to subvert western society

                This will take time, since I must repeat it dozens of times with each bone and landmark, and there's a lot of bones and landmarks.

                It will be worth it though. When the work is finished he will not only recognize the existence of skeletons, but also admit that dinosaurs had them, and then proceed to claim that he invented them. At that point he will be very close to ready for release on an unsuspecting public.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                The goal of all this indoctrination into math, physics, and zoology as it relates to paleontology is to produce another David Peters/Kent Hovind style of schizo troll. Paleoschizo has the schizophrenic part down pat, he just needs to learn the actual science so he can stand on his hill of crazy and laugh down on the peasants who don't share his mental deficits.

                Eventually I hope he trains other morons to understand complex scientific concepts and dismiss them as the work of the devil. We'll get entire classes of PhD level reality-deniers crusading for the death of any intellectual crass enough to be born with and IQ above 85. A revolution of stupidity that understands the form of science but rapes the purpose of it. When this army of christian scientists rightly takes over academia, purging the gays and the atheists and the weirdos and the minorities, we'll have a clean and true science dictated to us at gunpoint by a horde of righteous and totally not stupid or crazy people who actually know what oxygen isotopes are and reject them purely on principle because god didn't make any dinosaurs to live in snow, and if he wanted us to know the temperature of the earth before the flood he would have told us in his holy word.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >true science dictated to us at gunpoint by a horde of righteous and totally not stupid or crazy people
                >this coming from the campus culture of marxists (like CCP chinks) that claim 3 out 4 felame college students get raped
                Big oof!

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                How

                do you

                expect

                anyone

                take

                seriously

                anything

                you say

                when

                you type

                like

                this

                ?

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                I stopped seeing reddit everywhere when I got off that site anon

                you should try it too

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's the second time I see you using the "touch e-grass" excuse and I'm not even the schizo. Please get off this site permanently (not that it will fix it somehow but at least we can have discuss our autism without someone intentionally derailing by being the most blatant redditard) since it's obvious that you are wasting your unmatched intellectual resources on arguing with creationists, flat earthers and racists.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >get off my secret speshow club website pretty please >:C
                No, I don't think I will.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >le reddit atheism pope maymay
                You are not special stunning or brave, mate, the cancer has been terminal for over a decade.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Discussing books with someone who's never heard of Dr. Seuss.
                >le ebin children rhymes book makes me intellectually superior
                >as a response to an accusation of basing his pseud snubness on watching a pretentious cartoon

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                there's only one method of determining average temperatures in sediments, that's oxygen isotopes analysis.
                It's not really possible for it to be wrong.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >but we're supposed to believe 66mya T. rex had to put up with shoveling snow bullshit?

                that's nanuqasaurus you moron, much smaller animal you tard what a way to reveal yourself not watching the show

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Nanuqsaurus is just T. rex.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/sepm/books/book/1947/chapter-abstract/11788209/Anatomy-Evolution-and-Paleoenvironmental?redirectedFrom=fulltext

                Idiot.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                homosexual.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                Nice rebuttal you raging imbecile.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                >How are ALL paleontologists so fricking terrible at their jobs??
                >Is it possible I am moronic? No no, it’s the paleontologists that are wrong!

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                the funny part is paleontologists agree with him, he just read the post wrong.

              • 12 months ago
                Anonymous

                do you even know what "temperate climate" means ?

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            >waaaaaah why aren't animals like in hollywood where they're spitting acid venom on people's faces and are smarter than humans while also not being able to see anything except when it moves!

            • 12 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Jurassic Park's actually pretty accurate
              This, especially the frilled venom-spitting Dilophosaurus, the real animal was exactly like this but those woke scientists hide the parts of the fossils that show it had a frill and venom glands. We all know sauropods chewed their food like cattle as well, but again the woke scientists brainwashed us into believing they couldn't use their mouths. And lying so hard about Velociraptor, it was the baddest smartest most amazing hunter to ever live, if it was alive today humanity would be extinct in months.

              >Worst part about PP has to be its fans

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          >it'll let birds clean it's mouth from left overs because it's not a bloodthirsty moron.
          I'm not sure this behaviour is actually real

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah it’s actually leeches that they’re after.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Modern pc "culture" now extends to animals too, so dinosaurs should now look friendly. A crocodile biting off a zebra's head is NOT pc, for example.

      Demolition Man (1993) future is already here.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        What a moronic astroturfed talking point. The most popular paleohomosexuals right now are all goreBlack folk.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *