Why is every thing that humans do to the environment regarded as bad, even if it copies what nature does?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Why is every thing that humans do to the environment regarded as bad, even if it copies what nature does?
you should genuinely die
I don't worry about the climate, and I'm not going to be lectured by people that instigate wars and drop bombs about how I need to put my teabags into compost instead of the garbage can
Because it has no SOVL
Because forces of nature are above man's judgement, but the stupidity and greed that compels man are not.
I wonder what lives there.
lots of crustaceans and sea grass along with the things that eat them, it's actually turning the open ocean much more lively.
shut up moron
this is the answer but OP was being wilfully stupid
human nature
>anything YOU do is wrong and annoying
>anything I do is fine
when have you ever heard someone say, "gosh that huge crowd of people is doing wonderful things and I wish they'd stick around"?
never happens. People hate other people or at the very least find them pretty annoying, especially as a group.
Because Greenpeace types are misanthropic socialists that hate the West and want to punish white people for their success by dragging their living standard down to the same level as the third world.
man made climate change isn t real you fricking libfarts
Why is he staring at his tiny hands?
why don't you go hump a lion you gays, see how the ecosystem reacts to your mauled corpse. Humans are meant to manipulate nature to become something idyllic for us.
You are talking to a board where half of the gays on here would hump lions if they could...
Intelligent design. Something occurring over the course of thousands of years due to decentralised factors and variables is far more interesting and precious than something occurring over a few decades entirely by human influences.
Thats it.
i look like that
I want to destroy ecosystems and remake them with the species I like.
Look up studies on European peoples having an inmate gravitation towards guilt. They have existential guilty feelings even in the absence of anything applicable happening, the feelings then manifest themselves in other ways.
The climate stuff was made up as a control mechanism that can be tapped into every day, all day. "Feel bad and harass others into wiring their bank account to a israeli banker or politician"
That's not blood. It's christianity.
That religion teaches you from day one that you are evil and need to feel bad about what your ancestors have done The entire religion is based on that one sentence.
But those ancestors didn't actually exist, they were made up to defame god's brother and equal, lucifer, as part of the great lie.
t. white and feel 0 guilt, but i'm also a satanist.
>noo its the dogfrickers! you cant criticize my caveman religion made up by satan's equal (and possible inferior) to sate his ego unless you have sex with dogs!
Kill dogfrickers
Kill homosexuals, pedophiles, and trannies (same thing rly)
kill priests, imams, and rabbis (see above)
burn the vatican and destroy every mosque, synagogue, and church
Hail satan, who gave us the knowledge to identify evil and destroy it, so we could overcome the evil spirit who lied about being god and tried to cast him into the fire
Simple as
How are you enjoying your Christmas break off of school, champ?
A naturally barren area is blameless, and has been that way for so long that some life has inevitably grown to completely depend on it. There's beauty in a desert.
Human made shit heaps displace previous beauty, and rarely add anything of substance. Sure in 100,000 years it'll erode into something aesthetically pleasing despite the sparse nature, but humans don't live for thousands of years. I care about the shit which exists right now and existed until just recently because some frickers ruined it to make some stupid bullshit. Human made badlands is evidence of some frickers ruining things for everyone else.
>umm why is that BADlands are somehow... bad?! I just don't get it my fellow mongoloids
I wonder why change over 10,000 years is different from change over 10 years
Because we can choose whether we create badlands and deserts or not, while natural forces act without thought or reason? I thought it was obvious.
You will never be a real badland.
OP, how many times have you literally tried to frick concrete lately
be honest (0 will be taken as dishonesty btw)
Badlands and deserts AREN'T good. There's this dumbass idea that anything that nature does is okay. It's not. That's one of the sources of the global warming alarmism. b***h, we're int he middle of a fricking ice age. That's pure dogshit for terrestrial life. There is no way in satan's twat that 1850s temps are the "ideal".
But badlands look cool
Well, the're also useful for gathering data about dinosaurs and paleoflora so I can resurrect them, but they're not very good for hosting life.
this is probably more of that "le noble savage" that plagues anthropology infecting other fields of natural science
Deserts are important for climate regulation.
Not good climate regulation.
Most people don't know this because it was discovered in like 2014, but the sands from the Sahara are carried across the ocean in the upper atmosphere and feed the Amazon rainforest, if the Sahara was green the Amazon would be a desert like it once was, it's a cycle.
If the sahara was green we would live in a way better world.
The Sahara is what kept the KANGZ out of Europe for 10,000 years
Bet that's what your wife tells you about her pussy.
>badlands aren't good
well duh
First, it's a pile of rocks, not badlands. Second, I like seeing eco succession like this. 100 years from now this pile may look like a forest.
Idk I'm not sober so I'm just going to try to bullshit my way through this. An environment isn't just what's above the soil. You can't just dump a bunch of quarried pea gravel and some sprouts of moisture retaining plants here and expect a real ecosystem to form. Those plants if they survive are going change whatever ecosystem is already there. Which might result in the death of whatever organisms are currently living there out of some sense of corporate guilt or trying to hide what they've already done. Just "why?" if life of any kind even microbial has established itself there why change it be more pleasing to us?
>You can't just dump a bunch of quarried pea gravel
That is quite literally what the glaciers did with the terminal moraine.
Then how come coals mines in the US that are less than a few decades old already support a young ecosystem? The vegetation will stay short and scrubby due to the lack of soil which is beneficial to animals such as rabbits, snakes, and birds. Especially when everything surronding the area is mature shaded forest. You need diversity in the landscape, even if its something drastic like this.
>muh heavy metals
Look up what a serpentine barren is. Everything we do nature already does.
You’re missing the forest for the trees. Carbon sinks can’t absorb our emissions this quick and the ecosystem is not suited to adapt to these drastic changes. We’ve already caused a lot of species to go extinct and destroyed habitats entirely. We are destroying faster than nature can recoup, in a few hundred years will be reaping the effects of that, but the window of action is now.
Why is a warming planet bad?
Too fast. Biospheres won't adapt.
>inb4 BUT THERE WERE MASS EXTINCTIONS ALL THE TIME IN THE PAST
I'd personally not be happy with being responsible for a fricking global mass extinction event.
>Too fast.
False and moronic. I don't give a frick about polar bears. I'm going to plant palms on your grave. Dinosaurs will visit and take big coprolite shits.
>Biospheres
You misspelled "maladaptive evolutionary dead ends".
>PANDA'S BAD
Pandas have existed longer than humans. Chinks wiped out their habitat. It's like I'm actually on fricking reddit. Now complain about koalas having chlamydia despite humans being the ones that gave it to them, just like they did with leprosy to armadillos.
>Pandas have existed longer than humans.
Yeah, and coelacanths have existed longer than tetrapods. Doesn't make them any less useless pieces of shit that lucked out in a loser niche which no adaptive species would even want to waste time in.
>despite humans being the ones that gave it to them
And I will do it again, you bearlover!
You're a useless species.
Your panda-like failures doesn't represent our species as a whole, you aeluropodine-hugging loser.
>I'd personally not be happy with being responsible for a fricking global mass extinction event.
Anon, why wouldn't you be happy with such an achievement? Especially if it were the deaths of things such as dogs or mosquitoes or israelites?
>Pandas have existed longer than humans. Chinks wiped out their habitat. It's like I'm actually on fricking reddit. Now complain about koalas having chlamydia despite humans being the ones that gave it to them, just like they did with leprosy to armadillos.
Dude the pandas fricking suck, all they do is mope around and eat shit all day, they're lazy freeloading buttholes and I want to beat the everloving shit out of all of them. Honestly anything that isn't human or cynocephaly has been an evolutionary dead end for society, I mean at least those demon worshipping flesh eating c**ts gave us Adam Sandler. But no, the neighbor's dog won't even shut the frick up and has to shit on the sidewalk, all because they can't get with the times or get sorted the frick out.
Are you proud of being this ignorant? Like a proper fool.
REDDIT MOMENT!!
>NOT MY CUTIE WUTIE PANDERINOS AND KOALINOS
Stop acting like you have a vegana, you'll never be a real woman. We cannot stop all human progress and economic progress for the sake of stenotropic darwinian dead ends that are a chinese recipe away from extinction. What's next? Evacuate entire cities for the sake of localized species of brine shrimp in seasinal waterholes?
Hello oil industry plant
You only hate the oil industry because a israelite told you to.
because it only causing an explosion of algae in the water
Is it only causing phytoplankton and cyanobacteria to flourish or plants also? This is a rhetorical question. Also, it's not CO2 causing algal blooms. Bet you can't guess what it is.
NTA
It's nitrogen, isnt it?
Largely. If by nitrogen you mean freshwater pollution mainly comprised of human and agricultural waste.
>muh carbon muh global warming
Why does EVERY discussion about the environment always turn into some shit about climate change? Literally who gives a shit?
There was a little ice age 700 years ago that killed off reptiles and some plants in the northern parts of their range even though nowadays they can survive there as proven by reintroduced populations.
Warmer climates support more biodiversity. I don't know why anybody would want more frozen barren shitholes on this planet.
EVERYTHING humans do isn’t regarded as bad. Artificial reefs are a good example. The problem is that when humans do shit to nature, they’re normally doing shit that is overall harmful to the local ecology. The badlands you posted are a good example. Those existing isn’t by default a bad thing. There are animals, plants, fungi, etc that are all adapted to living there. Now if you strip mined those badlands and left a giant open pit in your wake? Not only would the dry, erosion prone conditions that create those badlands still exist, but you’d have a mess of other issues like acid mine drainage, petrochemical pollution, and so on. So. Unless humans are acting for the sake of improving a habitat they’re likely just making things worse. It’s like if I burn your house down and tell you it’s fine because you burn some wood in your fireplace. Time and place matter a whole lot.
You also get more arid shitholes if you jack up the temperature. Plus more energetic storm systems. Every discussion about the environment turns to climate change because it’s a big problem. Since it ties into everything from deforestation, to desertification.
I can’t tell if you’re geniunely moronic and think climate change will just make every biome into a warm and biodiverse ecosystem with a mild climate or just baiting but either way I give up trying to argue lol. Here’s a link to an article if you wanna read it. https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/how-are-climate-change-and-biodiversity-loss-linked.html
I don’t get why you’d be on a board for nature if you don’t care about protecting it.
No I'm just trying to drown you. Once your kind are ash, THEN every biome can be a warm, diverse paradise.
>I don’t get why you’d be on a board for nature if you don’t care about protecting it.
Lol
Your own article says that climate change wouldn't be a problem if humans didn't frick up the environment so badly, preventing species from migrating naturally. We've regulated nature to little parcels of land surronded by suburbs and city, and when those areas change the organisms that live there don;'t have anywhere to go.
Go back to my example of the lizards and the little ice age. Maybe those lizards would have made it back to the northern edge of their range naturally, but even by that point humans have already severly fragmented the environment and the only lizards up there were ones introduced by us.
>I don’t get why you’d be on a board for nature if you don’t care about protecting it.
Same reason I got a bachelor's in environmental engineering and natural resource management, to make you dirty hippie reddit sciencefans seethe by being more qualified on the subject.
>I got a degree to upset people on the internet
sure ya did
Usually because it has unforeseen consequences that come back to bite us in the ass.
lack of sovl
Due to the Abrahamic religions if you ask me
Silly dogfricker.
because we do it quicker and more efficiently, numbnuts