>respect property rights
b***h this planet does not belong to you. There is an entire class of humans that have seriously convinced themselves that the planet belongs to them as their personal property. It doesn't and never did.
Humans, especially "official" humans LOVE killing animals. It happens so often one suspects it has frickall to do with actual policy and is just subhuman filth abusing their power to abuse animals.
This. It's the same with officials killing or harming innocent people that they knew were never a threat - I usually hate sjw stuff but you can be damn well sure 99%+ of the time someone is killed like that it was simple cruel bloodlust.
Monsters exist throughout society. They're the same people that led witchhunts in the old days and in other parts of the world like the middle east still rule today. Normal people say - what's the motive? Why would they do such a terrible thing unless they were scared? Because being scared is something they can relate to, they can't relate to just killing innocent creatures just for the fun of it.
Do you think people who got into their position because they love animals/nature and have worked for many years to get to their position would enjoy euthanozing a mother bear and her cubs?
Fricking think about how much trouble one bear not afraid of humans breaking into a family's house can cause before you give in to your own personal pessimism homosexuals
Lol let me tell you something, anon. NOBODY who works for the government loves animals more than they love obedience to authority. An government organization that deals with animal welfare or the environment basically exists to destroy those things. I work with these subhumans and most often have to work around them. They will 100% stand in the way of any actual animal abuse prevention or environmental protection/restoration effort. That you can set your clock by. But want them to kill an endangered species because it's annoying a boomer? They're your guys.
I work for one now and I've worked for 7 different conservation/fish & wildlife offices. All some sort of government. Their effectiveness in conservation effort is a different argument, but I can tell you the people are ernest and empathetic. There's the fewest amount of psychopaths and sociopaths in this field because it requires empathy as a base to want to work in it.
I would either encourage you to share what you mean by having to work with subhumans or take your meds.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Their effectiveness in conservation effort is a different argument, but I can tell you the people are ernest and empathetic
Lol no. They think they are, but all they do is parrot hunter propaganda and worship death. The actions of these agencies betray their actual loyalties. I'll give you two examples from Florida Fish & Wildlife. They spent over half a century trying to convince everyone that flamingos weren't native to Florida and were actually an invasive species. It's so deep rooted now that most people believe this (it's very, very wrong). They withdrew this idiocy in 2018 - quietly. They've also classified water lettuce as invasive. Water lettuce is native to Florida and was here before humans. But it's not just their action. The worst part about these agencies is how FRICKING TIRELESSLY they work to PREVENT action to actually conserve anything. Case in point: sea turtles are at greatest risk within their first year and almost 100% of them die during this time. That's why they lay fricktons of eggs. But they're very easy to take care of and it would be easy and cheap to just raise them in small pools for a year then release them. But there's no way in HELL any government agency would ever allow this. They'll give all sorts of moronic reasons, but the truth is they hate nature and want it to die. It's the same mentality as National Geographic photographers scaring animals into killing themselves and claiming they can't prevent it because it's natural. Like all things in the satanic country of america, most solutions could be easily and cheaply implemented, but the gatekeepers won't allow it under ANY circumstances.
11 months ago
Anonymous
I can give examples like this all fricking day. It's actually tedious to write all the details because this shit literally DOES NOT FRICKING END. Let's next visit Yellowstone - possibly the most mismanaged park on planet Earth with one of the most valuable resources: the largest herd of purebred American Bison in existence (last I accounted). But you know what Yellowstone does? They kill them. No, not let them die. LITERALLY slaughter them. They do this for two reasons: the local ranchers command them to and government agencies will do ANYTHING a rancher demands. Anything. And native american tribes want the meat. The Bison are also heavily infested with brucellosis (which ranchers gave them, which is why they want them culled). Yellowstone has lightly discussed curing this (it's a curable disease), but they will never in a million years do it because that would be progress and we can't have that.
Fort Collins basically invented Chronic Wasting Disease. Agencies in the south intentionally released feral hogs which are insanely distructive to native ecosystems because hunters wanted to hunt them. Ohio refused to reintroduce elk because hunters "didn't show interest", as if their only job is to suck hunters' dicks (it is and they know it).
There is literally no end to these fricking moronic and evil shenanigans. If you work for a government agency, you are subhuman.
Nobody actually cares if they can get away with it, which with animals is nearly every time because penalties for harming or killing them are always a joke.
Relocating dosnt work with problem bears, once a bear figures out that humans lead to easy food, itll nearly always opt for raiding and attacking camps, houses, and people. This is especially bad when a mother has cubs, theyll learn the behavior from her.
>black bear trekked 1000 miles to get back to her favourite park
Awwww. I admire her dedication.
Also, why would bears being comfortable around humans be a bad thing? Domestication could be next. Same with all those other urban animals that are getting comfortable around us.
Most humans don't even know how to take care of a dog properly and we've had thousands of years to study their behaviour. A bear is at least 10 times more dangerous than a dog and add to that the fact that maybe some people wouldn't be too happy with being held up inside of their own house by an animal stealing their hard-earned food and you've got a recipe for disaster.
If you want to domesticate an animal it takes more than just letting it break into your house and steal your food. You need to breed them for traits that are favorable/helpful to humans over many lifetimes.
There's a difference between being comfortable around humans and being comfortable attacking humans. Bears that get used to human settlements tend to prefer the latter.
>Same with all those other urban animals that are getting comfortable around us.
Those urban animals account for hundreds of thousands of injuries every year. Once 800PSI bite force bears get added to the urban wildlife list, I imagine many of those injuries will turn into deaths.
>one thing about pitbulls is that will almost NEVER attack their own owners
I don't know what you're talking about. That happens literally all the time. It's just they're everyone else's problem more frequently.
Humans, especially "official" humans LOVE killing animals. It happens so often one suspects it has frickall to do with actual policy and is just subhuman filth abusing their power to abuse animals.
This. It's the same with officials killing or harming innocent people that they knew were never a threat - I usually hate sjw stuff but you can be damn well sure 99%+ of the time someone is killed like that it was simple cruel bloodlust.
Monsters exist throughout society. They're the same people that led witchhunts in the old days and in other parts of the world like the middle east still rule today. Normal people say - what's the motive? Why would they do such a terrible thing unless they were scared? Because being scared is something they can relate to, they can't relate to just killing innocent creatures just for the fun of it.
Because these bears don’t fear humans, associate human dwellings with food, and demonstrated the ability to enter a human dwelling. Euthenization sucks but someone absolutely would have been injured or killed by those bears eventually.
Bears in the wild will eat whole beehive's worth of honey at once (along with a bunch of bees and larva) often enough. A single round of cupcakes will not cause them any harm.
That's as many as six tens, and that's terrible
It's proven that black bears have sweet tooths, they are known for pillaging campgrounds searching for pop
Why wouldn't he? If you were smart, you'd do the same thing, you cupcake-deficient coward.
Imagine a bear being the defendant in a kangaroo court under Bird law.
If you'd just learned to cook your own food, none of this would be happening now.
Nothing says "I'm successful" like getting defensive on 4chin
>If I legally own a piece of land
How do you own land? Did you make it? Did the person you bought it from?
>respect property rights
b***h this planet does not belong to you. There is an entire class of humans that have seriously convinced themselves that the planet belongs to them as their personal property. It doesn't and never did.
Pretty sure stealing cupcakes isn't a felony.
Nice strawman.
North America is bear territory, so you look very silly talking about them respecting human "property rights".
>No, that was someone's property. If a human would have done this he would have been punished for it.
Get a load of this guy.
Would they walk over to him with a shotgun as he is eating his meal for the day and shoot him?
Bro it's a bear you're being autistic what do you want him to do pay reparations
unfortunately that's the best option. bears that don't fear humans like that will eventually end up harming someone
Playing Devil's advocate here: why couldn't these bears just get released into back into some forest away from humans? Did they really need to die?
Animal organizations are run by psychopaths.
Do you think people who got into their position because they love animals/nature and have worked for many years to get to their position would enjoy euthanozing a mother bear and her cubs?
Fricking think about how much trouble one bear not afraid of humans breaking into a family's house can cause before you give in to your own personal pessimism homosexuals
Lol let me tell you something, anon. NOBODY who works for the government loves animals more than they love obedience to authority. An government organization that deals with animal welfare or the environment basically exists to destroy those things. I work with these subhumans and most often have to work around them. They will 100% stand in the way of any actual animal abuse prevention or environmental protection/restoration effort. That you can set your clock by. But want them to kill an endangered species because it's annoying a boomer? They're your guys.
Take your meds schizo
A bear should invade your house and maul you, you wouldn't mind it
I wouldn't. And it wouldn't maul me.
I work for one now and I've worked for 7 different conservation/fish & wildlife offices. All some sort of government. Their effectiveness in conservation effort is a different argument, but I can tell you the people are ernest and empathetic. There's the fewest amount of psychopaths and sociopaths in this field because it requires empathy as a base to want to work in it.
I would either encourage you to share what you mean by having to work with subhumans or take your meds.
>Their effectiveness in conservation effort is a different argument, but I can tell you the people are ernest and empathetic
Lol no. They think they are, but all they do is parrot hunter propaganda and worship death. The actions of these agencies betray their actual loyalties. I'll give you two examples from Florida Fish & Wildlife. They spent over half a century trying to convince everyone that flamingos weren't native to Florida and were actually an invasive species. It's so deep rooted now that most people believe this (it's very, very wrong). They withdrew this idiocy in 2018 - quietly. They've also classified water lettuce as invasive. Water lettuce is native to Florida and was here before humans. But it's not just their action. The worst part about these agencies is how FRICKING TIRELESSLY they work to PREVENT action to actually conserve anything. Case in point: sea turtles are at greatest risk within their first year and almost 100% of them die during this time. That's why they lay fricktons of eggs. But they're very easy to take care of and it would be easy and cheap to just raise them in small pools for a year then release them. But there's no way in HELL any government agency would ever allow this. They'll give all sorts of moronic reasons, but the truth is they hate nature and want it to die. It's the same mentality as National Geographic photographers scaring animals into killing themselves and claiming they can't prevent it because it's natural. Like all things in the satanic country of america, most solutions could be easily and cheaply implemented, but the gatekeepers won't allow it under ANY circumstances.
I can give examples like this all fricking day. It's actually tedious to write all the details because this shit literally DOES NOT FRICKING END. Let's next visit Yellowstone - possibly the most mismanaged park on planet Earth with one of the most valuable resources: the largest herd of purebred American Bison in existence (last I accounted). But you know what Yellowstone does? They kill them. No, not let them die. LITERALLY slaughter them. They do this for two reasons: the local ranchers command them to and government agencies will do ANYTHING a rancher demands. Anything. And native american tribes want the meat. The Bison are also heavily infested with brucellosis (which ranchers gave them, which is why they want them culled). Yellowstone has lightly discussed curing this (it's a curable disease), but they will never in a million years do it because that would be progress and we can't have that.
Fort Collins basically invented Chronic Wasting Disease. Agencies in the south intentionally released feral hogs which are insanely distructive to native ecosystems because hunters wanted to hunt them. Ohio refused to reintroduce elk because hunters "didn't show interest", as if their only job is to suck hunters' dicks (it is and they know it).
There is literally no end to these fricking moronic and evil shenanigans. If you work for a government agency, you are subhuman.
Nobody actually cares if they can get away with it, which with animals is nearly every time because penalties for harming or killing them are always a joke.
Relocating dosnt work with problem bears, once a bear figures out that humans lead to easy food, itll nearly always opt for raiding and attacking camps, houses, and people. This is especially bad when a mother has cubs, theyll learn the behavior from her.
>black bear trekked 1000 miles to get back to her favourite park
Awwww. I admire her dedication.
Also, why would bears being comfortable around humans be a bad thing? Domestication could be next. Same with all those other urban animals that are getting comfortable around us.
Most humans don't even know how to take care of a dog properly and we've had thousands of years to study their behaviour. A bear is at least 10 times more dangerous than a dog and add to that the fact that maybe some people wouldn't be too happy with being held up inside of their own house by an animal stealing their hard-earned food and you've got a recipe for disaster.
If you want to domesticate an animal it takes more than just letting it break into your house and steal your food. You need to breed them for traits that are favorable/helpful to humans over many lifetimes.
There's a difference between being comfortable around humans and being comfortable attacking humans. Bears that get used to human settlements tend to prefer the latter.
the vast majority of humans are dumb and would harass bears until they attack
>Same with all those other urban animals that are getting comfortable around us.
Those urban animals account for hundreds of thousands of injuries every year. Once 800PSI bite force bears get added to the urban wildlife list, I imagine many of those injuries will turn into deaths.
Frick humans.
Imagine if pitbull mommies could be bear mommies.
I honestly don't see the problem. Humans are not important.
You need to be 18+ to post here
you could sell it
>heroic black bear journeys 1,000 miles to knock over trash can
To be fair - one thing about pitbulls is that will almost NEVER attack their own owners so that headline is unrealistic.
Far too dangerous, they go for the smallest toddlers they can find instead - why make life difficult.
>one thing about pitbulls is that will almost NEVER attack their own owners
I don't know what you're talking about. That happens literally all the time. It's just they're everyone else's problem more frequently.
There is absolutely, positively, no lesson to be learned here. None whatsoever.
>and I would walk five hundred miles
>and I would walk five hundred more
>just to be the bear who walked a thousand miles
>to fall down at your park
Humans, especially "official" humans LOVE killing animals. It happens so often one suspects it has frickall to do with actual policy and is just subhuman filth abusing their power to abuse animals.
This. It's the same with officials killing or harming innocent people that they knew were never a threat - I usually hate sjw stuff but you can be damn well sure 99%+ of the time someone is killed like that it was simple cruel bloodlust.
Monsters exist throughout society. They're the same people that led witchhunts in the old days and in other parts of the world like the middle east still rule today. Normal people say - what's the motive? Why would they do such a terrible thing unless they were scared? Because being scared is something they can relate to, they can't relate to just killing innocent creatures just for the fun of it.
Because these bears don’t fear humans, associate human dwellings with food, and demonstrated the ability to enter a human dwelling. Euthenization sucks but someone absolutely would have been injured or killed by those bears eventually.
Do bears get diabetes?
no, they have an incredible metabolism, but I doubt all the random chemicals and preservatives in the cupcakes can be good for them
what about the video of a brown one drinking a 2L bottle of mountain dew/sprite or whatever and getting hurt and crazy by it ?
Bears in the wild will eat whole beehive's worth of honey at once (along with a bunch of bees and larva) often enough. A single round of cupcakes will not cause them any harm.
The mass of 60 cupcakes in no way equates to a beehive. This bear is going to be clogged
Why is it always black bears doing this shit?
purely economic factors
Socioeconomic factors
he saw the cocaine bear movie and wanted Hollywood to give him a chance by being sugar rush bear
That's as many as six tens. And that's terrible.
But what flavor were the cupcakes?
honey
I was
hungry
Like the girl who shot up the school because she didn't like Mondays.
The real question is, why would those Black folk scare away a poor animal just looking for food?
Because they weren't his cupcakes
imagine the sugar rush
He was hungry.
Did you even read the article?
I didn't believe you video was real until I saw your trips. Never buy an unsliced pizza!
yummy