Why are the dick sizes of animals all over the place? It should just scale based on size of the animal

Why are the dick sizes of animals all over the place? It should just scale based on size of the animal

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    i'm german heritage and same. usually 2 to 3 flaccid.
    i don't remember the biggest i've ever seen it but i've had a few erections easily 7+ (6 - 6.5 being typical) where the stretching actually started to hurt. most of those were in the bath or shower for some reason.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Increased blood flow in the hot water

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Our donkey has a massive rager, sometimes he just lets it hang.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Greeks and Romans thought that small peepee=less libido, therefore a wiser and more controlled man. Large peepee the opposite.

    Not quite right. Just the Greeks had that belief. Romans considered larger ones to be ideal.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      According to this tumblr post (lol) this was true

      weren't roman statues of naked men altered after the christian revolution?

      I don’t know about ‘altered’ but they were typically vandalized, specifically the nose for some reason

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >that tumblr post
        Yeah, I have huge doubts about that, as romans had kynodesme and practiced infibulation to promote modesty.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Kynodesmēs were worn for sporting events and when in public, community bath houses kind of require you to be naked

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I get it, but checking everyone's dicks to determine whether to contunue doing whatever they were doing or to interrupt that and applaud just because they were born different seems unlikely to me. If it was something the person could achieve, like being well-built - then it would make at least some sense.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    do you think evolving clothes allowed human dicks to get way bigger?
    like without pants or anything, dicks as big and exposed as ours would be a huge liability

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Reminds me of this:

      ?si=zaTQQhN32LpoKq0G

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      absolute unit

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Sounds plausible, like you say having junk swinging around on a hunt or something would not have been ideal

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I've thought about this before. Have you ever seen a naked man run? His junk is flailing around wildly, it being smaller would make it easier to run naked.

      https://i.imgur.com/wRZQxuM.png

      I have another tangential question. Why do greek and roman statues have really small peepees? Not even shitposting bit this thread has got me to consider the norm for humans and I realised a lot olympian statues that we consider the pinnacle of human physique or form are not exactly to code when it comes to proportions down there. Have dicks in humans grown a lot more in recent history or was it somehow really fricking cold down in the Mediterranean.

      One thought I had was that maybe the models worked out before they posed for the mason to get their muscles pumped up. Working out makes me shrink up dramatically since all the blood is used elsewhere. They're also posing naked in Europe in an era known to be much colder than current day, and cold also causes shrinkage.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Does penis size preferences have any evolutionary reasoning in humans or is it purely cultural

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      it makes women happier so they'll have a stronger bond with their well endowed partner, theoretically being a better mother

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have another tangential question. Why do greek and roman statues have really small peepees? Not even shitposting bit this thread has got me to consider the norm for humans and I realised a lot olympian statues that we consider the pinnacle of human physique or form are not exactly to code when it comes to proportions down there. Have dicks in humans grown a lot more in recent history or was it somehow really fricking cold down in the Mediterranean.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      because its not the point of the statue

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Greeks and Romans thought that small peepee=less libido, therefore a wiser and more controlled man. Large peepee the opposite.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      weren't roman statues of naked men altered after the christian revolution?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      italians and greeks are all major growers. Were talking 2incher to 7+
      e.g. me. Italian ancestry and my grow gap is cartoonish. Also have cousins that confirmed this.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm like this too, but I'm neither Italian nor Greek.
        Maybe my fantasies about being descended from the ancient Greeks are real after all... I mean it could explain why I love sodomy so much

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The frick kind of animal is that? Is he jerking off?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Thats his wand and he is casting spells in his sleep

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Sleeping fossa with morning wood, if he wanted to jerk off he'd just stick it in his mouth.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I guess that would make sense
          Never occurred to me that other animals could get morning wood…

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            all animals are capable of dreaming

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Non Sequitor

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                why don't you seq my 3cm gorilla penis moron

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I don't think the context calls for that level of action based on the informal nature of this forum.
                I see you posting this same thing a lot.
                did you learn a new word?

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >It should just scale based on size of the animal
    Maybe it is?
    Gorillas are manlets.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Drawing the human as 6'8 is cope if i've ever seen it

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's 68 inches i'm moronic

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm 6'9 tall irrelevant of you interpreting the graph wrong, there's no reason to discount outliers.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    All I know is the ladies can smell my hog from miles around

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What is that gesture of his supposed to signify?

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The actual truth its totally random and serves no purpose

    The mutations of the dicks actually control female sexual behavior more than female sexual behavior controls the mutations of dicks

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      its actually both, the mutation occurs randomly but the females need to be able to choose their mate so this mutation will be passed along and get a snowball effect in the next gens

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    genital size correlates the amount of promiscuity of females, and when selecting for secondary sex characteristics. basically bigger penis means the species usually has a lot of whoring, like chimps have gigantic testicles because their females frick around a lot, gorillas on the other hand beat the ever living shit out of each for access to females, so theres not much pressure to have more efficient genitals if you have a monopoly on reproduction

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      explain walruses then

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Fat chicks need more dick.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's more of a logistical issue - you'll find that it's pretty long on most quadrupeds simply because further reach is required to get to the cervix with a torso that long.

        Drawing the human as 6'8 is cope if i've ever seen it

        It's 68 inches i'm moronic

        The imperial system, ladies and gentlemen

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      moronic take, the size is based on how the species is built, if a horse had a human sized dick then it would never be able to copulate as the dick wouldn't reach during mounting, they would have to figure out an entirely different position to make copulation even possible.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        serotine bat method

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Then why do some birds have exceptionally long penises while some have basically no penis?
        I'm not disagreeing I think you're right but why the discrepancy in birds specifically, when they all frick the same way anyway?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >they all frick the same way anyway
          A duck certainly doesn't; their dick has more in common with a pig's than any of the other bird species.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            That's what I'm saying though, bird mating positions don't change all that much from species to species, so why the big discrepancy?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        no, genital size correlates to whatever it's needed for reproduction

        none of that contradicts what i said
        humans have relatively small genitals for our size, most mammal penis reach all the way to the cervix, humans are the outliers, most animals, even one smaller than us, have relatively large penises
        stallions do have a monopoly on the harem, but they have to wait until the mare is in estrus, which means you have a specific time of the year for breeding which requires an efficient penis
        humans were not selecting for penis size, because the majority of the time is was monogamous couple through social cohesion, so efficient penis isnt really necessary because youre guaranteed to be the father, unless you want to get into the theory of the penis head being a semen scoop, but genital shape is a different topic

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >humans were not selecting for penis size, because the majority of the time is was monogamous couple through social cohesion, so efficient penis isnt really necessary because youre guaranteed to be the father,
          *harems not unlike gorillas where one man ruled the small tribe with iron fist and had sex with all the women while the other men had to wait until the big man died.
          ftfy

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            no, because the patriarch isnt forced into intraspecies conflict with other males, otherwise society would not have risen up, theres no point in be a bachelor for a patriarch, thats just being a cuckold, youre better off usuping the patriarch as is what happens in nature currently across many mammalian species. humans at some point decided that monogamy was the preferred option over dying

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Humans don't seem to have an obvious single mating strategy though, male selection probably would prefer that you just beat up manlets but even gorillas have sneaky twinks sometimes that try frick. Even women don't always have an ideal preference, the gigachad they imagine isn't usually the Duke Nukem looking caricature that men imagine but for a lot of women it is

          We have relatively small balls compared to a chimp, suggesting downright promiscuity is less, but bigger dicks than gorillas, but like I said, some women seem to have a preference for very masculine men even if they're frick ugly, most will have a preference for "social" success and the supposed most attractive man is actually slightly feminised

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            thats still not selecting for an efficient genital though
            we also have the thickest penis among primates, but thats more genital shape shenanigans

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Evopsych is absolutely fricking moronic

            Humans could have small balls because of less promiscuity!
            Or maybe, humans have smaller balls because we prefer to frick the same mate repeatedly, which delivers a larger volume of semen, and ball size isn't relevant to this so mutations for smaller balls proliferate easily. Even promiscuous humans will gladly frick someone 7+ times.

            Maybe, human sexual selection is actually driven by our tendency towards repeated fricking that only a god tier apex predator can enjoy, and the bigger dicks are to match the concurrent loosening.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              big dicks making a pussy loose is a myth. its mostly genetics

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                yeah thats what your mother said before she met me

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Jej

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            There's a lot of literature that makes it clear our default and main strategy is monogamy

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Humans have no trouble insemination horses with their penis.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          you need a bucket, cope.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          you need a bucket, cope.

          have a nice day

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Seethe

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Big balls in chimpanzees increases the males probability of being the baby daddy because they are a promiscuous species. Big balls means better sperm competition because female chimpanzees put out.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          but the balls arent used in fricking

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            and? having larger testicles means you can throw more sperm, more sperm means having a higher chance that yours will inseminate

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      no, genital size correlates to whatever it's needed for reproduction

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Why are the nose sizes all different

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >>Why are the nose sizes all different
      Nose size does, in fact, directly correlate to penis size.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why do you care? Just be happy you don't have a baculum because that would probably be the most broken bone in the human body if we did.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not me, im built different

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *