>Look at this animal that could easily disembowel me
>Let's go pet it
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Why are humans like this?
>Look at this animal that could easily disembowel me
>Let's go pet it
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Would it fit??? Anyone got a video of it??? For science of course
imagine making it your life goal to cuck a lion and actually succeeding
i have nothing but respect for that man
he has a youtube channel at https://www.youtube.com/@LionWhispererTV
they mirin
For some animals you could make a case for it, especially canines and felines because they're just bigger versions of what we've already domesticated. But people who keep venomous insects/reptiles as pets are just beyond stupid. It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
It's almost as if people are capable of making decisions based on more than just their basic survival instinct, especially if they can prevent the animal from harming them
All animals crave the human touch.
Better question:
-Why are female big cats such wet prostitutes for human men?
It’s tranquilized, dumbass
Helpless autism and curiosity.
Anon, I’m pretty sure this lion is tranquilized.
Then how is it hugging that guy?
It isn’t. The guy wrapped the lion’s forelegs around his neck to make it look like the lion is hugging him.
goddam mongoloids, you need to go back this is lion country
here is source of Op pic
scene from OP is on 4:55
other good rolling shot with lioness is at 1:30
he mention that he love lions very much and that some lioness really like to get him to the floor
he dont use tranquilizer only sildenafil
the chaddest chad that ever lived
You know, the second the claw start coming off, my hand stays the frick there.
you think we conquered the planet by being scared of four-legged homosexuals who roll around in their shit? pathetic beta, regain your place as master of God's dominion
Kek, yes actually, that is why we became the apex predator. Without fear of being killed every night by giant cats and dogs we chose to create weapons. Without fear that wouldn't have happened. You can go sit in the corner now dunce.
We created weapons as a natural second step from scavenging other animals kills. First we used rocks to crack open bones for marrow. And then we thought "wait, why not crack open animal for food when it still moving? GRUG GENIUS".
The fact that actual humans were frequently best buds with regular ass wolves (maybe semi-domesticated) subtracts even more credence from your half assed theory.
My half-assed theory that fear is a driving force behind survival? Kek you are a moron get off your phone in class
Lmao, so when are wolves and bears going to start making tools and weapons? According to you, it's just the natural second step after killing the animal.
The human could also snap the lion's neck, btw. Like with any animal with an appreciable neck, excluding giant mammals like cattle or elephants, obviously.
Even more obviously, this also applies to any smaller animal than us. If not snap their neck, then we could even bite or punch it to death. Why do small mammals like to cuddle with us, then? Do they have a death wish?
I just find your sentence very trivial and not as poignant and insightful as you thought. I am way past the realization that almost all non-predatory, non-violent interactions of complex animals are consent based. You may think "yes of course, what's the alternative?" The alternative is e.g. that said animals could just force their will upon the other animal, without injuring them.
>The human could also snap the lion's neck,
Only Floridians have that level of power.
the only argument for biodiversity is a selfish one and that's why it's always unsaid and left at "BECAUSE YOU JUST DO OK" tier -isms. humans are novelty seeking, resource gathering apes. humans therefore like to see a number of different things. diverse species are also resources - you can use each one as raw materials for something new. there's a reason for these apes to be instinctively attached to the idea of a diverse ecosystem.
step outside your monke mind and a lifeform is a lifeform. if every weird poison frog is replaced by cane toads it doesn't matter. it's the same as if the frogs were superseded by genetic clones. the amphibians are as happy as ever.
Please ignore the budding eco-terrorist AKA anti-human fanatic anon. If he stops getting (you)s he'll finally go get shot by a rancher or something.
Biodiversity doesn't just benefit humans, but life on Earth as a whole. All lifeforms on Earth are deeply interconnected and complementary.
When biodiversity starts to decline the environment where the extinctions took place becomes less and less suitable for life, eventually resulting in complete desertification.
You can't arbitrarily discard gears and cogs from the machine that keeps you alive and expect it to work as it did before.
Also are you the same person who wrote these posts?
If yes you drastically contradicted everything you've been arguing for so far.
The most anti-human stance one can have is thinking that our current course of action regarding animals and the environment is correct and natural.
>When biodiversity starts to decline the environment where the extinctions took place becomes less and less suitable for life, eventually resulting in complete desertification.
Life continues to exist in a desert even if it isn't life you find "pretty".
>The most anti-human stance one can have is thinking that our current course of action regarding animals and the environment is correct and natural.
I'm not anti-human or pro-human. I don't believe that the continuation of any one species is a priority, or even that the environment should be maintained for the survival or potential future evolution of some kind of species. Instead I believe in letting it all run its course.
I do not believe that individual human opinions matter. I believe that inherited human temperaments matter because those are evolution. You see, the funny thing about evolution is:
Every change makes something worse, whether or not the environment changes, and only sometimes does the environment change to make it less of a big deal
>Life continues to exist in a desert even if it isn't life you find "pretty"
Desertified land isn't the same as actual deserts.
>I'm not anti-human or pro-human. I don't believe that the continuation of any one species is a priority, or even that the environment should be maintained for the survival or potential future evolution of some kind of species. Instead I believe in letting it all run its course.
Letting things run their course is impossible because we are a huge presence on the planet that greatly influence all other forms of life by simply existing. We can choose to exist in harmony with the natural processes of our land or alter them and make our planet less and less suitable for organic life.
Also if you're such a nihilist, why do you even argue? Why do you care about being in this conversation?
>I believe that inherited human temperaments matter because those are evolution
If you think that destroying the biosphere is inherent human nature and not a perversion of modernity you are anti-human.
>I do not believe that individual human opinions matter.
No you don't, otherwise you wouldn't be expressing yours.
We're not the same poster
God created Man to be stewards of the Earth. It's human instinct to tame, utilise, guide, and care for animals. It is our very reason for existing
The Earth has been doing well for millions of years before humans came along.
By who's standards?
By the standards of the countless organisms that have been thriving and evolving on and underneath its surface for all that time. Do you see any of them complaining?
Do I see them complaining? What do you mean by this? Are you asking me if a chicken told me how great life was 500 million years ago?
Has any species ever renounced to existence because of our absence? Is the majority of currently existing species benefitting from our presence? Are they gathering around manmade habitats or away from them? Will they miss us once we die out?
Yes actually. Animals are drawn to us because there is an abundance of food be it from us directly or by drawing prey (like rodents and insects). We we actively conserve species who are going extinct either by our hand or from natural causes. We also regulate the overpopulation of some species through hunting and other means. To top it off, we've also developed veterinary medicine for treating many animals who would otherwise perish from causes they could never overcome on their own. I'd say yes in that we have an overall positive impact on wildlife.
>Animals are drawn to us
So why are forests, swamps, prairies and even deserts vastly more biodiverse than cities and suburbs?
>We we actively conserve species who are going extinct either by our hand
The species that are going extinct by our hand vastly outnumber those that are being properly preserved by humans. Most of those species would be abundant without us.
>we've also developed veterinary medicine for treating many animals who would otherwise perish from causes they could never overcome on their own
Only about 1% of the animals on Earth enjoy such care.
We are overall a scourge for the other life forms on the planet. Pigeons and rats eating our trash doesn't change the decline of biodiversity we caused over the last couple of centuries.
I consider it the manifest destiny of mankind to pet every one of gods creatures
they want it too, they simply do not know it yet. surrender yourselves to the dominion of man, all other living beings
I will gouge this fricker's eyes with my thumbs, then I'll get a solid grip around his skull to crush it into pulp.
Le big sigh:
obligatory
If I had the chance I would put a bullet in this subhumans skull, no hesitation.
See
Why do you insist on being an edgelord on Wauf? (and yes, you are more of an edgelord than the guy describing how he'd main the perpetrators, because he's coming from a place of moral indignation, you're coming from a place of indifference and cynicism)
>non-gruesome hunting pics get deleted
absolutely pathetic
Yes you did. Still are. Humans are a disease, but fortunately one that will soon be cured.
I mean it as literal extermination. Humans are a cancer.
>Um actually mass extinction and turning the world to a poison planet is good!
Death to your species.
>I support total human death
I'm a vegetarian and so do I, you fricking moron.
>vegetarians almost universally advocate for overpopulatuon
No that's you, moron.
>hurr durr erryone cin fit in texus
Maternal instincts are a hell of a drug.
I unironically cried
ywnbaw
>faceful of dog ear
Imagine the smell
I just want everyone to know, and I'm not joking about this, when it is feasible, I'm killing every single human who has ever done something like this to an animal. Every single one. None will escape.
meat industry is far worse than this, you know that?
The meat industry doesn't blend whole cats alive. It does to newborn chicks but they're dumb and it happens fast so they don't notice. Cats are much higher on the intellect scale
An agricultural farm kills infinitely more animals than a beef farm, you know that right?
A beef farm requires an agriculture farm to function. You know that right?
A field needs to be plowed twice every cycle, and there can be up to 4 cycles per year. Every time that happens moles, hares, snakes, lizards, and all sorts of undergrowth/underbrush critters are mowed down or displaced. It also requires regular applications of herbicides and insecticides which cause direct and indirect harm to wild animals.
A pasture needs to be plowed once and it can last potentially indefinitely, and very rarely needs to be fumigated, if at all. Pastures also need to retain trees to give shade to the cows, while fields need to be completely stripped clean.
Beef farms kill only the animals sent to slaughter, while agricultural farms lead to a constant carnage smaller animals. If you care about the cow that died for my steak you should first care about the piles of critters that died for your onion latte.
Fields don't actually have to be plowed, moron.
Why are you replying when you clearly dont know shit about the subject? Fricking smoothbrains wasting my time
Plenty of fields are practically never plowed and sending a thousand head out into a pasture obliterates and displaces plenty. It's also insane to just rely on nature for keeping pastures going. All modern farms which make profit are using pesticide, insecticide, and fertilizer on pastures off rotation. Cows require a stupid amount of land if you don't enhance it, and on top of that most cattle are given corn/wheat. It's not waste because nothing is ever waste as long as logistics are working. There are a dozen demanded uses for every part of a corn or wheat crop.
You're just wrong. Stepping up the food chain always always always fricking always causes tremendous loss of energy, and food production is so efficient that such losses (and retailing losses which are absurd) are the only thing left to improve on.
There's no actual way to rationalize your point of view other than "I'm okay with being completely goddamn moronic and believing fairies and unicorns are real in my magical world where eating a cow is less impactful than eating a plant".
Which non enduring culture is seeded without plowing you stupid moron? Holy shit.
Whatever you want. A seeding drill is used to plant, and you rotate in crops which condition the soil for you between seasons. No-till has been around and competitive for a long time, but a trillion dollars in existing machinery and tradition is a hard thing to change.
Try googling something before calling someone a moron, moron.
Is this that "vegetarians are the real carnivores" bullshit? Where do you ass parasites come from?
>this homosexual thinks I stuttered
At least these are used for food. But that's also no excuse for the wanton cruelty. But the homosexuals making torture videos of animals. I'm wiping out their entire bloodlines.
This is is no way worse than the blender video.
This is a 100% efficiency, the chicks are ground up in less than a half second and they probably dont even get to feel pain before their brain is mush.
The subhuman insect person tortured the poor cat for enough time that the poor thing felt every bit of it.
I cannot describe the things id do to that person.
That's some big talk from a keyboard. Bet you won't do shit. Realize that every minute someone or something is dying a horrible gruesome death at the hands of a person or animal. Every once in awhile some moron records one of these abominable acts. For every gore vid out there there's hundreds or thousands of similar cases that go unrecorded or undocumented. You nor anyone else on this site has the time and resources to hunt down every culprit committing these acts.
Just accept the fact that the world is chock full of cruelty and there's nothing any one individual can do about it. The cherry on top is that most of these people will never be punished.
Spooning a lioness is the manifestation of man's mastery over nature
lame. Tigresses are way better
Humans are weak to the Power of Cute
It turns our brains to mush
At the same time animals are weak to scratches and human hands can deliver them in just the right place.
all mammals are weak to the power of cute, it's how you get predators trying to adopt baby animals instead of eating them.
You just know
it is a mystery
bro is trying to lay some bird pipe wtf
>why can't I preen you? wtf is your problem?
She clearly loves her featherless friend though
Black folk getting eaten by lions for thousands of years 😀
>animal that could easily disembowel me
Like wolves?
Wolves are relatively weak when singled out
Despite popular beliefs, humans are compassionate creatures. Possibly the only animal that often makes decisions based on emotions. Sometimes even more emotional and compassionate for their own good but intelligence (usually) stops them from harming themselves.
All animals make decisions based on emotions.
You do not understand what emotions are.
Other animals don't have emotions as complex as ours.
proof?
Why doesn't other animals pet you?
Elephants have been shown to pet humans, can't think of another animal tho.
Gorillas (But they are Proto Humans)
i know Japanese who really love birds
Elephants think humans are cute, like we are little deformed baby elephants. Except Africans, elephants are racist against Africans, so are bees.
You never had a dog lick your face anon?
I be sitting on the couch and my dog would just hop on my lap and start coating my face with is mouth water.
you're gross
>I be sitting on the couch and my dog would just hop on my lap and start coating my face with is mouth water
zoophilic gross, have a nice day.
quality post
love it, loving dog
Dumb Black person
Typical bunny wants it.
Zoobunnies at it.
So full of fricking shit. Many animals are social creatures existing in groups so of course that requires higher thought and complex emotions to pull off. Even solidarity animals like big cats can be compassionate.
Unless you find a species that can understand abstract concepts like meaning and existencial despair, then no, no other animal has feelings as complex as humans.
Birds can practice self-harm and even suicide when kept in captivity. Sounds like you just know nothing about animals.
That still doesn't make them as complex as humans emotionally
>he bought into the "animals are biological machines" meme
>https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn8209-elephants-may-pay-homage-to-dead-relatives/
>https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0608062103
Elephants.
Your standards are low. Meaning? Call yourself more than the average animal when you can question the concept of meaning.
As a human i am the only animal to understand that those concepts are pure nonsense, fairy tales that range from delusion to ways to control other, dumber people. I’m pretty sure chimps or something actually believe in them.
Oh great now we have a materialist brainlet itt
My dog does that too when my parents are fighting. The dog would come running from whatever coroner of the house she would be at when she hears dad hitting mom and then jump on dad and start licking his face. Dad would get occupied with the dog and the fight would end. Bittersweet sight. Mostly bitter though.
>coroner
Corner.
Dumb mistake.
How is this relevant, anon? What am I missing?
He is trying to start cats vs dogs console war.
I would do mock fights with my aunt or father and our german shepard would try to intervene or maybe do the light biting on the ankles, which is probably sheep herding instinct kicking in.
>oh noez, my pack mate is attacked by strange thing
>must be a snake
>i need to defend my pack
>chomp
"omega" wolves behave in playful way, and often intervene when there is a fight in pack, taking the heat on themself
>"omega" wolves behave in playful way, and often intervene when there is a fight in pack, taking the heat on themself
That's a fun fact.
Emotions are never complex. Your ratiocination about your emotions are of varying complexity, but emotions are just body-states which naturally correlate to states-of-affairs.
N O M O R E B R O T H E R W A R S
>>All animals make decisions based on emotions.
proof?
>You do not understand what emotions are.
proof?
Animals make decisions on instinct. A lion will never look at a human and think
>Look at that majestic, beautiful creature, it would be a despicable thing for me to harm it, I will let it live in peace, if it is hungry I will feed it, if it is sick I will care for it, if it is in danger I will protect it
Only Man does this
The closest we have to that I think are ants and aphids and parasites/mimics that fool them.
Not even remotely related to what I was talking about. have a nice day, namegay
>>Look at that majestic, beautiful creature, it would be a despicable thing for me to harm it, I will let it live in peace, if it is hungry I will feed it, if it is sick I will care for it, if it is in danger I will protect it
>Ants do not harms the aphids
>Ants help them feed
>Ants might have rudimentary healthcare for them
>Ants guard them
Go selfdestruct tincan-chatbotmigger
Didn't read a single pixel of your attention-seeking, reddit-spaced shite. Do you feel in charge?
>Do you feel in charge?
Do you feel like a migger, migger?
The difference is it isn't spontaneous in ants. It's a genetic behavior built over millions of years through instinct and evolution, the ants NEED to care for the aphids to survive but they don't know that, they simply do what they've done for millenia. It's simple routine, like cutting a leaf or carrying a piece of dirt. You can expect any ant in that species to do the exact same thing in the exact same way.
Humans MIGHT do these things, possibly, if the mood strikes them and they personally feel some compassion in the moment. That's the difference, and there's no comparison
You are right, but to be fair I did say it was the closest thing in animals to humans keeping livestock and pets we know of.
Predators can develop appreciation for animals of other species they can easily eat and choose not to do it.
a lab can beat up a cheetah in a fight
Do cheetahs even fight each other?
Barely. More often he'd get wrecked.
Yes, the thing is they only really fight defensively, when they perceive someone is a threat. The very rare times they freak out and attack something outside of a chase they dont really know what to do. They have the tools to disembowel a human relatively easily (claws arent as sharp as other cats but a lot shaper than dogs) but they'll struggle to kill anything else than a child or an old lady. Anyone with a stick can fend one off.
Literally, objectively safer than pitbulls for domestication.
that's the point dummy. the lab could easily eat that cheetah but instead chooses to be friends
Cats bring their owners mice. Dogs bring their owners their kill, follow them, and protect them. Bears have been observed to stop, sit, and watch sunsets. Most animal species, when shown a picture of an owner who has passed away or simply has been absent for a while, will become visibly upset. Corvids develope friendship, and and tell others of their species who is friendly.
Animals are complex, and emotional. If you try to high five a feral predator, it will shred your face off. If you familiarize it to humans, and demonstrate that humans are not merely not a threat, but also friendly, then it will display socially friendly behavior.
Makes sense to me. The cherrypicking answers are pathetic to be honest.
>Look that cheetah that got raised up with a dog and never knew savanna didn't eat the dog!
'K…
>Possibly the only animal that often makes decisions based on emotions.
What about the animals that choose not to eat us because they like us?
>Possibly the only animal that often makes decisions based on emotions.
Literally all animals do this. Compassion isn't an emotion.
It’s just whites and asians having empathy for animals so we can hunt deer better and work together with wolves
Humans are dolphin level of evil
Maybe orcas specifically. Most dolphins don't come close to humanity's level of evil.
>It’s just whites and asians
SOME asians
asians can vaguely imitate empathy if you hack their bug programming into believing the animal is a status indicator
>asians having empathy
Europeans killed the European lion and 99% of the wolves in Europe and North America. Not to mention buffalo for fun and passenger pigeon because they are annoying or something. Americans even make Migratory Bird Treaty to stop empathy white men from shooting every bird at a swamp just to make woman's hats lol. China excuse is they must feed some billions of people, what is yours?
If you tell me a man can't hunt on his own land then you're nothing less than a tyrant and should rightfully receive a swift and painful death. 99% of hunters eat and utilise every available part of the animal they hunt and are careful to maintain a continuous supply. An animal wouldn't hesitate to brutally maul me for no reason for being in its territory, don't expect me to shed tears when hunters feed and house their families by quickly and humanely killing animals on their territory
>If you tell me a man can't hunt on his own land then you're nothing less than a tyrant and should rightfully receive a swift and painful death
In other words your mom forced you to do homework instead of playing Nintendo DS as a kid and you never got over your grudge for authority.
>99% of hunters eat and utilise every available part of the animal they hunt
Plenty of animals are exclusively hunted for fun.
>and are careful to maintain a continuous supply
This is why the world is full of dodos, great auks, Steller's sea cows, Lord Howe swamphens swamphens, thylacines and Carribean monk seals, because hunters are so good at managing the environment.
>An animal wouldn't hesitate to brutally maul me for no reason for being in its territory
Typical urbanite paranoia. Most animals will run away as soon as they see you. I met wolves and boars while hiking but the only animals that ever attacked me have been humans and domestic dogs. Get out of your parents' apartment and see nature in first person at least once in your life.
Didn't read a single word, cope and seethe
>and asians
https://www.culinaryschools.org/blog/three-squeaks/
>asians
Cheeky chink, you thought nobody would notice.
Unless you're trying to use your concept of evil as some sort of "goodness" of character you have yourself just proven that humans are good enough that when some go out of their way to be evil we become distressed enough about our tribes worthiness.
>asians having empathy for animals
Yeah I'm sure all those sea animals getting served alive in Korea restaurants are feeling really fricking emphathized with
This is correct, and evo psy can show us why. As persistent pursuers, we as a specie do not need to enact great displays of violence on our preys. Rather often, the death blow was on a creature already down, exhausted, defenseless. Killing can very easily be seen as a relief in that case.
There is more evo bio evidence for humans being scavengers than there is for persistence hunting.
Source?
>evo psy can show us why
Buss-chads, can we ever stop winning?
>the only animal that
Humans are not animals. Evolution is a lie, you are living with intelligent design all around you. Life is the most complex intelligent design there is.
But the Darwinist mindset made people more animalistic now, believing they are a random "soup" that "evolved" out of random tides and wind going back and forth or something. How utterly fricking moronic.
Oh, okay, sure, cool.
Is cancer intelligent design?
Is suicide intelligent design?
Is the inherent contradiction between monogamy and human instinct to reproduce as much as possible intelligent design?
You mean "why are STUPID humans like this"
Most humans wouldn't go that close to a lion
This:
Also the guy in the OP obviously thinks he has some special ability to stop himself from getting mauled to death. And maybe he does have a way with animals to reduce the chances of getting mauled, but wild animals are unpredictable, so he could still get mauled at some stage.