Well that's sad to see.
I wish I wasn't such a b***h when it comes to seeing canines in peril, I know they're wild animals and that's nature, but the dog-human empathy is too strong.
Yes but that is like saying a nuclear warhead is the best missile payload in a discussion about tactical air to surface weapons. Technically you are right, but it is so overkill and obvious it is mutually assumed that everyone knows that and are excluding it for more practical weapon systems otherwise it would go stale. Same goes for the brightest light on earth and people defaulting to the sun
>at least one or two would be fatally wounded
this is the problem for all grouping animals. like how a herd of bison could easily demolish any pack of wolves if they turned to fight, but at least a couple of them would be hurt. even though it's a better strategy for the herd, it's a worse strategy for the individual so they all end up running
this is why eusociality is such a broken strategy whenever it develops, when individuals sacrifice their life for the whole
Cummietism is parasitic no eusocialist. It’s like the video of that one bison knocking the other over so the wolves can kill it and the butthole bison escapes.
I remember reading that it takes about 9-11 hyenas to take on a lioness and around 20 hyenas to take on a male lion.
I wonder if it's the same ratio for wolves to bears
Wolves would win if they'd all commit.
But at least one or two would be fatally wounded. And who shall bell the cat?
yeah but no wolf wants to be the one getting killed. They're not wasps
And also why communism works
well it would work if we could genetically modify humans. But then so would many other systems
Really it's whether the individual pack members view a direct confrontation as worth it. Driving a bear off of their territory = worth it, getting killed for a mouthful of elk = not worth it.
If the wolves werent afraid of death they could all attack at once but it would be impossible wihtout taking casualties so they all just run away
Well that's sad to see.
I wish I wasn't such a b***h when it comes to seeing canines in peril, I know they're wild animals and that's nature, but the dog-human empathy is too strong.
Emphasise with bears instead
Is this in some kind of enclosure? What the frick?
kek
Emphasize what about them exactly
I meant emphasize, but my phone auto corrected.
Who would win, OP or a pack of wild penises?
OP is a natural predator of penises and avidly devours even the most humongous ones with gusto, it’s a foregone conclusion
A bear easily. They are considered apex for a reason
If they're apex then how come humans hunt and eat them?
I was reading some wildlife journal magazine and it had a recipe for seasoned bear meatballs
Yes but that is like saying a nuclear warhead is the best missile payload in a discussion about tactical air to surface weapons. Technically you are right, but it is so overkill and obvious it is mutually assumed that everyone knows that and are excluding it for more practical weapon systems otherwise it would go stale. Same goes for the brightest light on earth and people defaulting to the sun
Bears can one shot wolves.
Pretty sure there's videos of bears intimidating entire packs of wolves away from kills.
Yup, here https://youtu.be/yvqtQ1CRJsQ
Wolves would win if they'd all commit.
But at least one or two would be fatally wounded. And who shall bell the cat?
>at least one or two would be fatally wounded
this is the problem for all grouping animals. like how a herd of bison could easily demolish any pack of wolves if they turned to fight, but at least a couple of them would be hurt. even though it's a better strategy for the herd, it's a worse strategy for the individual so they all end up running
this is why eusociality is such a broken strategy whenever it develops, when individuals sacrifice their life for the whole
And also why communism works
Cummietism is parasitic no eusocialist. It’s like the video of that one bison knocking the other over so the wolves can kill it and the butthole bison escapes.
Except it doesn’t and the reason is ironically enough human nature not working that way
dogfricker is a communist what a surprise
Stick your mouth onto the tail pipe of a car, and keep inhaling until you see nothing but the void, and then flames.
i literally have no idea what about my post could have possibly pissed your schizo brain off this much
refer to
wow what pussies. if they all rushed him he'd be fricked. at the very least they could just continue until he inevitably tires out
How big is the pack? Are they experienced hunters or largely noobs?
Giga Satan has spoken
I remember reading that it takes about 9-11 hyenas to take on a lioness and around 20 hyenas to take on a male lion.
I wonder if it's the same ratio for wolves to bears
yeah but no wolf wants to be the one getting killed. They're not wasps
well it would work if we could genetically modify humans. But then so would many other systems
Counterpoint
Really it's whether the individual pack members view a direct confrontation as worth it. Driving a bear off of their territory = worth it, getting killed for a mouthful of elk = not worth it.
You posted a video of exactly that, and you're only pretty sure? You use language like a gay.
I'm an environmental science major, not an English one. Now frick off on out of here you dumb ugly b***h.