What does?

What does Wauf think about scientists attempts to eradicate mosquitoes? Personally, I’m against it.

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    The reason why people are afraid of doing it is because it's another step towards transhumanism. They side with the mosquitos because in the end you have more in common with a mosquito than with posthumanity which will see both of you in the same way: a pest.

  2. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Scientists need to eradicate roaches first. God I hate those nasty things.

  3. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think it's great

  4. 10 months ago
    Anonymous
  5. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Personally, I’m against it.
    based
    they keep untold millions of gamerwords in check

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >they keep untold millions of gamerwords in check
      if "in check" means "wanting to immigrate" then sure I guess

  6. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    We should dedicate our energy to eradicating ticks instead
    I struggle to believe that God told Noah to bring 2 ticks onto the Ark

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I struggle to believe that God told Noah to bring 2 ticks onto the Ark
      he didn't because all 3 of those things don't exist. stop believing in fairy tales parents tell their kids to behave

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I need xem to feed the fishies doe

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    i do want to genocide bloodsucking parasites

    mosquitoes are pretty bad too i guess

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Destroy! Them! All!

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    We already did that, but Black person Gates and a bunch of other homosexuals brought it back

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    We already did it once. Did the skeeters come back? Yes, without malaria.
    https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/about/history/elimination_us.html
    It's the reason you have never had malaria.

    Environmentalists would rather die than temporarily reduce the population of some moronic bird whose niche would be filled by crowchads eventually

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why?

      >Lolbertarian still ranting about ddt getting the axe

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Because it would probably harm the ecosystem.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Nothing eats mosquitos, it's a fricking lie. They spawn in tiny puddles where no fish lives, and they are too small as adults to feed birds or bats. Their ecological value is zero.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Nothing eats mosquitos
            I've seen it, don't lie to me

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >What is a Spider?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            I've seen videos of people making mosquito cakes, even HUMANS eat mosquitoes.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Go get malaria then and leave us sane people alive

          Who am I kidding, that day will come. Perhaps the biggest intraspecific enemy to our health as a species was not right wingers doubting the safety of an experimental MRNA vaccine over the killed virus types they were already taking - no, it will be left wing environmentalists opposed to a temporary mosquito eradication because some bats might die off and be replaced with other bats that eat 4% more moths.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            they're already a threat. the pace at which we could develop truly safe and effective medicines would skyrocket if animal and convict testing were no questions asked "frickin do it!" affairs if it were at all related to human survival.

            environmentalists and animal rights activists has delayed so much life saving research it is unreal through direct disruptions and legislation increasing the costs and extending the delays of doing the research
            we can not progress as a species until we totally roll back animal rights and start using involuntary test subjects again and ironically one country is like this already and they're about to buy the world economy because of it - china

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              m'lady

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                *tips fedora*

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The reason I've never had malaria is the vaccine
      Any animal reduction with the goal of letting more human live is a mistake. There's already too many of us

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Then follow your ideals and end yourself, you dumb c**t.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >There's already too many of us
        by what measure?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Start with yourself

        >The reason I've never had malaria is the vaccine
        it's actually because you live in a first world country that eradicated it - because people matter more than a nitpick regarding a blip in the environment (protip: it's doing fine). The vaccine is only 75% effective and unfortunately the parasite is capable of evolving resistance.

        Would you rather 25% of people die, or 100% of local mosquitoes die and then end up replaced with new ones in a year? If your answer is #1, if someone asked you if they could play russian roulette with one bullet in a four shot revolver aimed directly at your head, would you say yes? If you wouldn't, WHY WOULD YOU SUPPORT SAYING YES FOR SOMEONE ELSE?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      No there's just too many of you and your kind

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *