But what about other breeds, why do other dogs attack?
Breed or the Owner?
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
WE all know that pitbulls attack People because they are bred for DOG fighting
But what about other breeds, why do other dogs attack?
Breed or the Owner?
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
|
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Because a dog is a small stunted wolf, a natural enemy of man. They need training and socialization to understand their place in society, it doesn't come naturally to them, and most dog owners do not understand this, or view it as a feature.
My dog has a dogo argentino mom and American bulldog dad, or the other way around I cant remember. My favorite dog for the past 6 or 7 years. I have it since baby. I never put him on a leash when I walk him, only in the evening when he just wants to chill and I just pull him along for a quick pee. I always play with him pulling rope, he jumping me and biting playfully, im running after him grabbing and pushing and stuffing my arms in his mouth and grabbing his head and his paws and whatnot. I have a couple of leather gloves I let him run off with when we're playing. Im always left with some scratches and bitemarks in my arms when we play rough, but thats part of the fun. Great little doggy, always happy and listens very well
Pic related, its him chilling in the backyard
My mini aussie will allow strangers to give him commands because I taught him to love strangers. He is not even slightly aggressive unless he is playing. Also, if he did attack, he has an extremely weak bite force and will do little damage. Smart as heck too. People do not know how to train a dog and they often get dogs that are too big for them. I've known lots of big dogs breeds that are nice as frick. Rotties for example. My brother failed training him and he was still sweet as heck. It made me think that you really have to be a big homosexual to make a dog aggressive. You're more likely to make a smart breed timid than making a dog aggressive. My brother also had a German shepherd and it pisses in the house if it gets scared of men because he beat her when she pissed inside. The average moron with a pitbull or big dog with a heavy bite force is a recipe for disaster.
Threads like these remind me of why I advocate for Total Dog Death. Yes, all dogs.
>african tribe commits genocide with child soldiers
>TOTAL HUMAN DEATH YES EVEN THE FINNISH! HERES A NEWS ARTICLE WHERE THERE WAS AN ASSAULT IN FINLAND!
oh i see
its reddit logic
>Breed or the Owner?
Both
Women are the cancer to the civilization.
Government ---> Women ---> distraction
frick it, get rid of all unemployed dogs if you dumb morons won't all shut up. get a monitor lizard like a true king.
Who was in the wrong here?
https://twitter.com/cctvidiots/status/1717402561605759376
The small dogs owner for not popping the pit as soon as it bit his dog obviously
You can’t blame the other two animals. They’re clearly too dumb to be held responsible for anything.
Seriously boggles the mind how delusional pit owners are. Jesus frick.
What is it about dogs that attracts all the worst literal schizos? Is it breed autism? Mindbroken fetishism? Dick waving contests over who can spend the most on an animal? All of the above? There are annoying cathomosexuals but they are nowhere near as prominently moronic as dog schizos.
It's just redditors/liberals, women, and foreigners crying about pitbulls. Some people aren't in a hysteria due to s0i and estrogen levels or desiring of a police state/nanny state. And so they don't want their dog banned or euthanized because some random hood Black folk abuse their dogs or some random yuppie suburbanite never trained their dog and it lashed out once a few years ago. So the only schizos are the banning pitbull crowd. Everyone else is just telling them to frick off. But all we get is:
>think of the children!
>ur a nazi
>ur a Black person if you like pibbles
And other nonsense. It's crazy honestly. I never thought that a dog breed would have a huge portion of the population cowering in fear so hard that they have institutional support for this desperate housewife tier hysteria.
For example
>everyone
is just you and it stops as soon as your IP gets banned.
Why do the states with the strictest BSL consistently have the best gun rights if it’s “liberals soi redditing and crying”?
50 over 15 years for an insanely violent dog bred specifically to kill people for military purposes is actually pretty good compared to 250 over 15 years for a generic mutt race bred to kill dogs and pigs.
Consider “huskies” includes 5 breeds and wolf hybrids, and are nearly as popular as pitbulls, to get some perspective
>50 over 15 years
Alligators have killed even fewer people in that timeframe, but I'm still not gonna let my kid play with one. It used to be common sense that not all dogs were pets and that we shouldn't let children play with large dangerous animals, but modern civilization has shielded too many morons from Darwinism.
Alligators aren’t in contact with people 24/7
>not all dogs are pets
Obviously. Most dogs are pets. A clear wolf hybrid (or as dogsbite calls it, a big husky), fighting dog, or war/guard dog can’t ever be a family pet. But the stats are telling a story.
Rottweilers, despite being specialized for attacking people, are easier to keep under control even for morons. That was the original point. They’re better at the job.
And BSL works on deaths. Not bites, but deaths.
the human connection with dogs is stronger than the human connection with cats
it's just shitbull threads
becaus to defend them you must have mental issues
Real fighting man, real working dog. Secret service agent with his companion.
Dogfighting is a crime
Protecting the leader of a country is a job.
The shill will lie to you and say that shepherds are useless. He will argue with old pictures that pitbulls are for real men.
If shepherds are useless, what's going on here? And isn't this an old picture too?
Real men with real dogs.
Not a woodcut of some criminals in the old west. A real fighting man, with a real working dog.
Staffordshire Bull Terriers are the only Bull-Type Terrier capable of performing guard work. They just aren't effective at attacking people as a whole and they never were.
Bully and Mastiff type dogs are best guard dogs
These are playlists I made
Not the best, only the Staffordshire Bull Terrier is the top tier.
Snapshot will spam to bury this post. he doesn't want you to see this picture.
He will whine to the mods. His employer might even buy him a janny spot again so he can delete it.
no one dare confound his propaganda. But don't forget.
This is what he wants taken from you.
>Snapshot will spam to bury this post. he doesn't want you to see this picture....
Kek, prostitute, you'll get what you deserve
Why does he spam? Why does he say rottwilers are useless, get a pitbull?
>Look, my fellow white man, i found 3 rottweiler attacks over a decade, they are so dangerous, get a pitbull
Meanwhile, rottweiler chads
he spammed it again
https://desuarchive.org/an/search/image/wUCJJu-LOA47WHv5SvsZNA/
he keeps on spamming
https://desuarchive.org/an/search/image/fwt6VoF1trp_4RW0-b8HzA/
what is he a shill or something
https://desuarchive.org/an/search/image/C0WJA3EdI3M_E3weYnl4Uw/
he's even spreading lies about actual useful guard dogs
>can't hunt
>can't fight
>can defend itself and it's family / house / yard form dogs / animals / people
>will attack you / your family member / somebody else
actual lies. he really doesn't want you to own an actual useful guard dog, a breed that served with the wehrmacht and SS, a breed that is still purpose bred for top tier guarding ability (outside of dog show homosexuals).
and he will lie and spam every day to try and convince you to get a useless liability instead of a dog that will consistently protect you, because?
I think he's a israeli shill. He wants to weaken the white race.
>my fellow whites. us serbs are white. dont divide and conquer, my fellow whites. you should get rid of your real working dogs and get this dogfighting doglet that attacks at random and is a liability.
are rottweilers are vicious as they look? i'm pretty good at training dogs and my gf wants something that can make her feel safe during morning jogs.They don't seem to get brought up when people discuss violet dogs
Rottweilers are much more intelligent and capable than pitbulls. With them, it is the owner, not the breed. You can sort of have them as a normal ass dog that you don’t have to treat like a husky in a chicken farm (but its a pitbull around anything under 100lbs). Guarding and dominance leaves more room for thinking than prey drive.
>snapshot: pitbulls have prey drive. pitbulls were bred to kill dogs. pitbulls dont attack people. but pitbulls are good guard dogs.
Does that sound all that sane to you?
>Rottweilers are much more intelligent and capable than pitbulls. With them, it is the owner, not the breed.
This shit makes sense to this moron
Owner or the Breed
Guard dogs aren't lapdogs. There is a good use for many of those breeds but people don't uderstand their purpose. Dogs are specifically bred to be potentially dangerous. A moron can kill himself with his own gun or be killed by his own dog.
Some dogs are
Good dogs aren’t. Good dogs are bred to be intelligent workers, not unhinged killer instinct machines. Even working mastiffs are decision makers. They are TAUGHT when to do what to who and why. You can’t even get a trained one to eat poison.
Pitbulls are far closer to how cats are used than how dogs are used. The only brainwork they need is leave it and come. They’re uncontrollable murder mutts that fight expecting to eat their victim. That’s called game.
How do you keep them off the handlers? Terror. Aint no good dogman who hasn’t used his break stick for breaking things other than fights.
Don't care, pitbulls are ugly, violent, and useless so they must go. Plus the people who want them are universally trash so that's a bonus.
I missed you snapshot. BTFOing vitriolic pitbull haters. Godspeed.
have a nice day subhuman
Thanks
>Don't care
About what, this topic? So why are you here and why are you posting?
>pitbulls are ugly
Your opinion
>violent
That's not true and there's nothing wrong with being violent, it's natural to be aggressive and violent (Survival of the Fittest).
>and useless
The are very useful animals
>so they must go.
Where?
>Plus the people who want them are universally trash so that's a bonus.
pic
Are these people trash?
>Are these people trash?
Yes, White trash Is still trash.
if those people weren’t trash they’d hunt with blinds and rifles instead of fighting dogs
>being violent is good and superior
africans are more violent than serbs. are africans superior to serbs?
How strong a pitbull with rabies would be
Dogs are simply genetics and training. Why morons still ask these questions is beyond me.
>Buy a pit
>Give it nothing to do
>Be surprised when it kills something
This applies to any dog breed, they aren't your homosexual friend to hang around with and be a homosexual with, they are a friend that is begging you for a job to give their life purpose
If you don't want to give your dog a job, get a fricking braindead lab with prey drive completely bred out of it
>get a fricking braindead lab with prey drive completely bred out of it
Labs are cute but my friend and his wife have one and holy shit that thing is a smelly disgusting supersoaker of drool that always wants to play. No thank you.
These knife laws were pretty recent. It's a sad indicator of the decline in quality of citizens. When I was a kid in the 2000s, lots of kids would carry penknives, it was normal although I've seen a few frogs that weren't too happy about it. When my dad was a kid, charities would give them out to the kids at church as advertisements with their charity name on the handle. My grandad says everybody had knives at one time, they're useful tools for a lot of things, but nobody would dream of fighting with them or using them as weapons against others, and there only started being a problem when foreigners started coming over with ceremonial daggers. But also, when I was young around 2000, a gang culture started creeping into normal kids and they all wanted to emulate rappers. As we got a bit older, there'd be 12 year old kids at school smoking weed in lessons for attention and bragging about robbing and "taxing" people (mugging drug dealers instead of paying) and you'd think they were from some rough gypo family, but often they'd have normal parents that didn't know what to do about their kid wanting to be 50 cent. Sad times we live in. This was in a pretty quiet northern town too, it's probably mental in London. Thankfully, I've never been.
They've tightened laws multiple times in recent years, there used to be a cool sword and knife shop online, and shops around town that sold swords, katanas, hitler youth daggers etc. as recently as 2010 and they're all gone now. You'd need proof of age to buy them of course. Now, you get IDed for cutlery in tesco.
>he thinks this is new
In the 1800s boys started mugging people and doing drugs at 12-13. That’s when adulthood begins to set in.
The only new thing is today’s nightmare dog kills 30 each year instead of 3. People really used to count all 3 GSD attacks some year and say “worst dog on earth, literally bred for war”.
I've had bad experiences with unleashed german shepherds, huskies and that moronic, gormless, black-eyed, Cerberic hellhound we know as a pitbull. Folks, if you have a wife and kids, get a golden retriever female and get her spayed, expose her to children and other dogs/pets since it's a puppy and you'll probably be fine
>female
It doesn't have to be female. The male dogs I've had were more laid back and good natured than the females.
>I found 20 german shepherd deaths this decade!
>Your 30 YEARLY pitbull deaths are now invalid!
The only thing invalid ITT is serbia as a nation. It’s actually greater kosovo.
>I found 20 german shepherd deaths this decade!
>Your 30 YEARLY pitbull deaths are now invalid!
The only thing invalid ITT is serbia as a nation. It’s actually greater kosovo.
>I found 20 german shepherd deaths this decade!
>Your 30 YEARLY pitbull deaths are now invalid!
The only thing invalid ITT is serbia as a nation. It’s actually greater kosovo.
>I found 20 german shepherd deaths this decade!
>Your 30 YEARLY pitbull deaths are now invalid!
The only thing invalid ITT is serbia as a nation. It’s actually greater kosovo.
>I found 20 german shepherd deaths this decade!
>Your 30 YEARLY pitbull deaths are now invalid!
The only thing invalid ITT is serbia as a nation. It’s actually greater kosovo.
>I found 20 german shepherd deaths this decade!
>Your 30 YEARLY pitbull deaths are now invalid!
The only thing invalid ITT is serbia as a nation. It’s actually greater kosovo.
>I found 20 german shepherd deaths this decade!
>Your 30 YEARLY pitbull deaths are now invalid!
The only thing invalid ITT is serbia as a nation. It’s actually greater kosovo.
>I found 20 german shepherd deaths this decade!
>Your 30 YEARLY pitbull deaths are now invalid!
The only thing invalid ITT is serbia as a nation. It’s actually greater kosovo.
>I found 20 german shepherd deaths this decade!
>Your 30 YEARLY pitbull deaths are now invalid!
The only thing invalid ITT is serbia as a nation. It’s actually greater kosovo.
>I found 20 german shepherd deaths this decade!
>Your 30 YEARLY pitbull deaths are now invalid!
The only thing invalid ITT is serbia as a nation. It’s actually greater kosovo.
Breed or the owner
Why would German Shepherd go and attack sheeps?
I have numerous attacks (pics and vids) of shepherd breeds (Border Colie, Belgian Malinois, German Shepherd, Kangal, Dutch Shepherd, etc...) but I can't post here (graphic images)
Here is Kangal attacking sheeps
Why would breed bred for guarding livestock attack livestock?
bump
Breed or the owner
Labrador Retriever or owner
Both. I’ve actually been researching this a lot lately. There are neurological conditions that can turn any dog into a time bomb. I read on a hunting dog forum last year about a guys English Setter just snapping and running across the room to maul his granddaughter. That said certain breeds were literally created to bite shit and some are bred to be a neurotic head case. Shitty breeding exacerbates the issue and inept owners are a tragedy multiplier.
I’ve read a bunch on working dog forums what the general consensus on different guard dog breeds is and the results were interesting.
GSDs, Mals, and Dutchies are generally all considered good for the job of biting people not just because they’re trainable but they have that neurotic fear induced aggression that I think lends itself to this type of behavior. That’s good for a working dog but shit for a pet and working K9s were never really meant to be pets and a lot of them report incidents when cohabitation with kids specifically. They are “actively” aggressive as opposed to “reactive.” An old saying is that a mastiff will dare a motherfricker to climb his fence. A Mal will climb the fence to go get the motherfricker.
Mastiffs surprisingly aren’t well liked for the work because they are “reactive” as opposed to “actively” aggressive. There was the famous case of the Presas killing that lady a while ago but they’re generally considered at best a personal protection dog. More of an intimidator than actual attack dog. Famously wrist biters and the general belief is that they do that because it’s the farthest they can actually get from the person in their minds while still doing what they were trained to do.
Pits and Bulldogs are generally considered physically capable of the work but the decoys typically complain that they give up too quick if they miss and when they bite something they bore easily if the thing they’re biting doesn’t struggle to get loose. They like to brawl.
Contd
Rotts are widely regarded as good working dogs. Probably the ideal “yard dog” but lack the athleticism of the herders to really win awards. Less likely to come up the leash and bite their handler than the herders are from my understanding as well. They also don’t like to let anyone other than their owner touch their collar. It’s not surprising to me they are #2 in lethal attacks behind pits.
Dobermans are a very interesting breed because they were actually purpose bred to be personal protection dogs while the rest are pretty much just repurposed herding and fighting dogs. Medical issues aside they’re known for being soft and while they are pretty brave on a leash and next to their owners they aren’t really “going out to get me one” type of dogs. They like to chomp chomp chomp instead of holding and ripping. Deterrents moreso than killers.
Giant Schnauzers have pretty much been ruined but there are still some people trying to save them as guard dogs. There were some sold to US (Delaware I think?) police in the 90s. They described it as a grass fire. Beautiful, terrifying, and over in a flash. Seen a couple good ones working corrections but the odds of seeing any GS is low. The odds of seeing one on the news for murdering someone are astronomically low.
Airedales were the original British police dog and you will see some predictable terrier behavior. They search and bite vagrants the same way they do boar. I could see them being an issue to humans. But again so rare to be a nonfactor.
Finally Boxers. The snub nose actually makes it harder for them to grip. Johnson type American bulldogs have the same issue. In addition they’ve also been so bred down I don’t even think most people associate them with being a guard breed anymore. Dog aggression can be high I suppose but they just don’t have the same history or recent use as the other bully breeds.
In conclusion beware herders and rotts.
reminder a literal discord of zoophiliacs ran by a pitbull obsessed serb is spamming the catalog with pitbull threads
>Noooo dont be racist against my Black person dog! That wasn't a pitbull it was a pitbull mastiff mix!
you will never have kosovo
Ofc but are these people white?
i am not answering your question, because it's a loaded question
i am going to point this out:
you, and the person who labeled all those mexicans as white, did the same thing
>actually they are spaniards AKA white. a true mexican is 100% indio.
>a TRUE pitbull is, etc
i am not answering your question, because it's a loaded question
i am going to point this out:
you, and the person who labeled all those mexicans as white, did the same thing
>actually they are spaniards AKA white. a true mexican is 100% indio.
>a TRUE pitbull is, etc
i am not answering your question, because it's a loaded question
i am going to point this out:
you, and the person who labeled all those mexicans as white, did the same thing
>actually they are spaniards AKA white. a true mexican is 100% indio.
>a TRUE pitbull is, etc
i am not answering your question, because it's a loaded question
i am going to point this out:
you, and the person who labeled all those mexicans as white, did the same thing
>actually they are spaniards AKA white. a true mexican is 100% indio.
>a TRUE pitbull is, etc
i am not answering your question, because it's a loaded question
i am going to point this out:
you, and the person who labeled all those mexicans as white, did the same thing
>actually they are spaniards AKA white. a true mexican is 100% indio.
>a TRUE pitbull is, etc
i am not answering your question, because it's a loaded question
i am going to point this out:
you, and the person who labeled all those mexicans as white, did the same thing
>actually they are spaniards AKA white. a true mexican is 100% indio.
>a TRUE pitbull is, etc
i am not answering your question, because it's a loaded question
i am going to point this out:
you, and the person who labeled all those mexicans as white, did the same thing
>actually they are spaniards AKA white. a true mexican is 100% indio.
>a TRUE pitbull is, etc
Less emotions
First they come for pitbulls
Then other powerful breeds (guard dogs - Mastiffs and Shepherds)
And then guns, knives, pepper sprays, etc...
Don't fall for pitbull psyop
Never give up your freedom
To say you already posted this would be an understatement
https://desuarchive.org/an/search/image/fDRG14ZOP_V9OU7TrF41Gw/
To say you got BTFO would be an understatement
"First they come"
What kind of state coming for pitbulls first promptly passes a law pre-empting gun restrictions by re-affirming the second amendment. How does that work?
And why are the most anti-gun states in the US also anti-BSL?
snapshot seems to be a israeli woman
a man responds to each point with his own, and only sinks to repetition and insults when arguing with a woman (if slapping her is not an option) because he gets tired of trying to argue with a broken record
a woman dismisses, insults, and repeats herself incessantly until everyone leaves.
Argentinian Anon said it correctly and if you can't see it
I can't help you my fellow white man
See
You're too dumb to get it.
And you just proved yourself wrong.
https://www.nraila.org/gun-laws/state-gun-laws/arkansas/
Learn what psyop means
Learn what propaganda means
First
Then we can talk
>vatnik babble
Nebraska gun laws check?
https://giffords.org/lawcenter/gun-laws/states/nebraska/
More lax than serbia, for sure.
First they come for pitbulls
Then other guard dogs
Then weapons
>Europe
You were told that europe and america do not have the same culture regarding how dogs and guns are viewed.
See
>oh an actual example, lol, now look at this weird rambling
Let's check the gun laws in kansas
https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/resources/ccw_reciprocity_map/ks-gun-laws/
https://everytownresearch.org/rankings/state/kansas/
Super lax.
> In 2021, Kansas lawmakers overrode the governor’s veto, voting to allow 18- to 20-year-olds to carry concealed, loaded handguns in public without a permit, including on college and university campuses. The state now maintains none of the foundational laws needed to protect the public from gun violence
First they come for pitbulls. Then they... STRENGHTEN gun rights? Oh no, your agenda!
Owner. Even if dogsbite misidentified 50 or 100 pitbulls, owner.
Rottweilers are the quality athletic guarding mastiff that pitbull gays wish they had. As deadly, more controllable.
No good for dogfights, because a rott fights to protect someone, and a pitbull wants to kill and eat their opponent. Unless they're defending their owner a rottweiler will normally tap out of the pit. But if they are defending their owner, a rottweiler will kill until they die.
Yeah I'm sure those rottweilers really thought those preschoolers and elderly grannies were threats to their owners lmao
>dogsbite.org ''statistic''
>trying to justify dogsbite.org ''statistic''
>smear campaign against (one) dog breed
>divide and conquer tactic ''PITBULL BAD ROTTWEILER GOOD NOW FIGHT'' *rubs hands*
>spout nonsense with no evidance
Ok
When they ban pitbulls, Rottweilers are next, what are you going to do about it? Same dogsbite.org people you are trying to justify are behind banning of all powerful breeds (guard dogs) in the US and Canada.
What are you going to do about it fellow dog, gun and freedom loving white man?
see again here, you clearly missed it
>iowa
https://www.nraila.org/gun-laws/state-gun-laws/iowa/
lax gun laws. first they come for pitbulls. then they go shooting.
They're whiter than you are magyar gypsy
Another example of dogsbite.org lady pumping pitbull statistics up.
Dogs in the middle killed one man and they were labeled/counted as pitbulls by the media and dogsbite.org
>pitbulls killed a man
>they were counted as pitbulls in media
Weird
Both dog's skulls are too wide, try again.
>Never give up your freedom
It should be perfectly legal to shoot these shits the second they are caught roaming off-leash, yes.
Ofc just don't give up your freedom
I think you're generally correct that pitbulls are overcounted in bites, but the idea that pits aren't dangerous is fricking gay. Too many people get their dog for purely aesthetic reasons and only want to squash what the breed's genetics drive them towards, rather than using it to their advantage.
>but the idea that pits aren't dangerous is fricking gay
You will not find dogs that look like this attacking people or other animals. These dogs are in the middle of nowhere and they are used for what they are bred for by people who know more about dogs than anybody else, those people know how to handle their dogs properly.
They're in the middle of nowhere because they're lowlife criminals. Cowards, who don't respect the lord, their father. They hide like rats. The way they handle dogs doesn't function for anything but a fighting dog. All they know about dogs is fighting dogs. And dogfighting is illegal.
A white man follows the law.
>just follow my law
Romans 13:1-2 says: "Obey the government, for God is the One who has put it there. There is no government anywhere that God has not placed in power. So those who refuse to obey the law of the land are refusing to obey God, and punishment will follow."
>Obey the government
The bible can’t be argued with. Even islam agrees.
verse 4:59
O you who believe! Obey God and obey the Messenger and those in authority (uli al-amr) among you. And if you differ among yourselves concerning any matter, refer it to God and the Messenger, if you believe in God and the Last Day. That is better, and fairer in outcome
what would immoral and emotional be? perverts?
>think of the criminals in distant trailer parks
i guess a serb would empathize with that type
literally from the moment the sun rises in serbia
pathetic spammer
>Cat threads
Just cat ''people'' and cat people
>Dog threads
Cat ''people'' loosing their mind
Don't make me pull out the toxochad image.
In the end it's just an animal. Even humans act like wild apes sometimes, regardless of race. All it takes is a few generations of inbreeding for schizophrenia to arise. Same applies to dogs. If it's a degen purebred it might be fricked in the head.
Pitbulls attack people 3x more often than all other dogs combined because pitbulls are bred to respond to threats as if they were prey.
Dogs (wolves) do not naturally fight to the death. They always try to minimize injury and escape if possible.
That's not true and it comes from dogsbite.org lady.
>Pitbull is an outdated term...
All of this also comes from dogsbite.org lady and non of that is true.
German Shepherd refers to German Shepherds
Rottweiler refers to Rottweilers
Pitbull refers to everything
>WHY DO PITBULLS ATTACK SO MUCH
And the question is WHY DID HE DO IT? BREED OR THE OWNER?
is an outdated term...
>All of this also comes from dogsbite.org
I’ve never browsed that site, we’ve simply reached the same conclusion despite being at opposite ends of belief (I am a pitbull realist, not an apologist.) Which means pitbull does indeed refer to something other than the American Pit Bull Terrier and will continue to do so despite your breed autism.
German Shepherd refers to German Shepherds
Rottweiler refers to Rottweilers
Pitbull refers to everything
>>WHY DO PITBULLS ATTACK SO MUCH
You will always be a woman
based dog roastie destroyer, sometimes they're all right
Serbs are never getting kosovo back. You will be double pounded by the us and eu forever
>WE all know
no we don't, tard
most of Wauf hates you but ignores your stupid threads.
>owner or breed?
none, or both
most dog attacks happen because that dog has an undiagnosed mental illness, now what caused that? congenital issue? bad breed? head trauma? each case is unique, the only solution is shooting it to kill as soon as that dog displays dangerous behavior
Unfortunately we can’t do that because a liberal enough moron will draw the dangerous line at killing a rabbit but after killing a rat or killing a cat but after killing a rabbit because it’s based on their personal like of some animals and not others
Sone people will want dogs put down if they chase chickens. Unfortunately 100% of hunting dogs chase chickens.
So what you’re saying is that a collar and leash solve the “pitbull problem” wow truly amazing. Someone with a minimum of a brain.
Breed History & Job Description: The AKC recognizes four terriers classified as "bull types": Bull Terriers and Mini Bulls, AmStaffs, and Staffies. All have a similar backstory. A few centuries ago, in the days when dogfighting was considered a sport instead of a crime, breeders experimented with various crosses to create fighting dogs possessing the strength and the punishing jaws of Bulldogs and the fiery spirit and quickness of terriers. The AKC's four "bully breeds" are the most successful and enduring of those experiments.
If your breed isn't on this list, it's just an out of standard staffordshire
>But the APBT is...
Only literal CRIMINALS even stressed this definition. For everyone else, it is an out of standard staffordshire.
However this doesn't mean none of those are pitbulls either, because pitbull doesn't refer to a breed any more than "husky" does (SIBERIAN husky is a breed, HUSKY is not)
The term for dogs closely related to or descended from the bull and terrier is "pitbull". This is identical to the practice of referring to poodles, labradors, goldens, duck tollers, and working mixes such as doodles as "retrievers".
The entire point of snapshots spam is that he doesn't understand english. Pitbull is not the name of a breed. Retriever is not the name of a breed. Husky is not the name of a breed. Mastiff is not the name of a breed. However, when most dogs covered by such a name are not an AKC recognized breed, such a name has a very important use, otherwise these clearly related and purpose bred dogs have no name, just mixed breed or "some mongrel", which is an entirely useless term that discounts that they are identifiable.
>The AKC recognizes
Lol
>bully breeds
Disqualified and discarded Reddit nuspeak. In what world is it OK to classify a Boston Terrier with an American Pit Bull Terrier?
no arguments? ok
Meet my mothers dog, louie. A male un neutered shitbull with ((Anxiety)) He lives in a crate most of the day and is allowed to run around the gated off living room and goes for a daily 1/4 mile walk outside every evening. The dog is extremely aggressive towards everyone in the house and my mom is the only one that it can be around when in the house. I'm basement dweller so my contact with it is very limited but my dad has to have my mom put it outside or in its crate so he can walk from his room to the bathroom or kitchen. With me especially the dog goes ballistic. I hate it and it picks up on my nervousness. If it sees me it begins barking and lashing out and my mom grabs him by his collar and begins petting him and babby talking to him while intermittently popping treats into his mouth until he stops barking. I asked her what the hell she was doing and this is her exact quote.
>Louie cannot be angry if he's eating his favorite treats. When I give him his treats he stops.
She simply does not grasp the concept that she's rewarding bad behavior, She simply sees that the dog stops being aggressive when he is given treats. (Also she's a woman and will move the earth before admitting she's wrong.)
In b4 kill it. As much as id love to do it and even have the means to do so I decided its honestly just best to wait for it to attack and then run in with the shotty and blow it to hell. Also in b4 move out you basement dwelling NEET. I work full time and i'll be damned if i'm gonna give Mr Sheckleburg half my paycheck every month for some shitty apartment when I can live at home for damn near free.
>here’s my overweight 24:7 crated dog
>uhm uh he’s aggressive because uh. Oh! He’s 30% Bull-Type Terrier
I honestly think it would be best for everyone involved, yes the dog too, that you poison it
>thinly veiled zoosadist thread
Wow who would have thought that people who molest their dogs want to kill entire groups of dogs based “le jaw too square”
Id love to But there's several issues. If it does die i'll forever be suspected and she already told me id be kicked out of the house and probably arrested for animal abuse. Secondly its made me the laughing stock of the family as she told the rest of the family how petty I was for showing such hatred towards her dog. So now she gets to see first hand what I was warning her about.
You should probably move out of that house I don't think it's good for you there
That's American Bulldog or American Bully and this was posted here at least 3 times.
both of those are square headed baby mauling shitbeasts
Nah bro that's an Uruk-hai not an orc
Xylitol is pretty inexpensive and will kill a dog quickly. Feed it to him at night after everyone has gone to bed, its better for everyone including the dog.
i hope the dog gets loose and mauls you in your sleep
Just slip it a grape or chewing gum
Poison it you can do it very easily. Don't wait until the unavoidable. Stick something in his throat after the fact so people think it died from choking
louie deserved better than your moronic family, call animal control moron.
Jesus. As much as I hate pitpulls, but I feel bad for Louie. Reminds me of my old roommates dog
>Roomie is rich but naive and spoiled
>Always wanted a Husky, so he goes buy a $5k purebred husky puppy
>Didn't neuter the dog cause he wanted to breed him (never did)
>Puts it in a cage while he's at work 12 hours a day
>Dog continually pisses and shits everywhere
>Even when he's home, he never takes his dog out for a walk
>Dog runs around and constantly barking with pent-up energy
>Roomie gives him treats and bones to shut up
>Dog is near-obese after just a few years
>Ends up dying at 8-years old cause of "underlying health issues"
I took the dog for a walk when I could, but I had my own shit going on at school so all I could do is watch. RIP Hank.
DO IT AGAIN BOMBER BILL!
>why do other dogs attack?
Go to the youtube channel "I Hate Dogs" and you will have all your questions answered about why dogs are aggressive pieces of shit "animals" that are full of parasites. I put animals in quotes because its debatable if they should even be considered animals. They are more like mutated science experiments in reality. Dog lovers are actually degenerates but especially pit bull lovers. Anyways, dropping some redpills.
Just in case one of you guys want to act all stupid and throw racial slurs at the guy since he is black, he even drops red pills on white obsession with dogs and is giving white America fair warning to cut it the frick out with the dog loving or white people will continue to face the consequences of this nutty homosexualy insanity. White women keep adopting these disgusting shits as surrogate children rather than actually having children.
This guys channel is a gold mine on the issues dogs actually are bringing to society. Especially white America. I encourage you guys to put aside your biases and do your own research. Don't even just take his word for anything. Zoophiles and dogs are on watch. The world is going to wake up to all this insanity one day.
>civilized people for 40,000 years: dog good
>some guy who is statistically likely to be bit by a dog for committing a crime because he is statistically likely to be a criminal: hol up let me tell you how it is while sounding like i never leave the house or just make everything up. actually all dog owners frick them!
>civilized people for 40,000 years: dogs are good slaves
>people today: dogs should be part of the family!
First of all I thought that we are white nationalists hating pitbulls because they are like black people
Second, what's with dog hate fellow ''''white'''' ''''man''''
Third, pic related. Another anti-dog channel linked directly to dogsbite.org and r/dogfree
Well that's weird, coincidence ofc
Only subhuman Black folk and shitskins see dogs in a hateful light. I assume this is mainly because you all are seething at the white man's ability to conquer nature.
lmao moron why would anyone breed em to dogfight, they can't even fly a plane
Most dogs are violent and unstable and humans are stupid for keeping them as pets just because their wholesomechungus image
I don't blame him too much. Serbs are basically on par with dogs. They're less evolved proto-white simians.
We all know who the most feral violent dog breeds are, but what about the most docile? Who are they?
ENTER
Really hate how people actually think dogs are fricking smiling.
Dogs have four expressions that look like a smile. Only one of them is actually a smile.
We tell NPCs (ie: you) that "dogs don't smile" to stop them from getting hurt because for the 3 that are not actually smiles, getting too pushy can result in the dog defending itself. The one that is a smile is dependent on ear position and the state of facial muscles you can't even see unless it's a husky, wolfdog, shiba inu, etc,
So it's more like "ugly, dysgenic dogs are physically incapable of smiling but your shiba inu can". The NWO doesn't want to spread this as common knowledge because it would start a massive pushback against dog breeders shitting out non-smiling dogs like samoyeds that are physically incapable of a real smile because their face is too deformed.
You literally can't tell this from just panting with most dogs. Only wolves, huskies, shiba inu, etc
Any excessive lip meat makes it almost indistinguishable from being relaxed and panting. Only wolves, huskies, shibas, etc have the facial configuration needed to differentiate this expression from just neutral panting.
frick off weeb
I found 20 german shepherd deaths this decade!
Your 30 YEARLY pitbull deaths are now invalid!
The only thing invalid ITT is serbia as a nation. It’s actually greater kosovo.
>SOMEONE NEEDED A BANDAID! BREED OR OWNER? SOMEONE NEEDED TWO STITCHES! BREED OR OWNER?
>Pitbull degloved childs leg in savage mauling
Serbian IQ lowest in all of balkans.
Make America Bomb Serbia Again
>I found 20 german shepherd deaths this decade!
Question is '' Why do German Shepherds attack? ''. Can you answer on that question.
>Your 30 YEARLY pitbull deaths are now invalid!
They are invalid because they are fake. That statistic is made by counting numerous breeds, breed mixes and mix dogs as pitbulls.
For example pic related are Rottweilers that were involved in fatal attacks on humans in the US...
... and these are according to media and dogsbite.org pitbulls that were involved in fatal attacks on humans in the US
All of those are at least part pitbull
Who cares, you serbs are literally too stupid to use basic logic. It's been months and you are still too fricking stupid to understand you are trying to redefine a generic term for a breed group similar to "retrievers" as a term that only applies to one very specific breed that only one small kennel club even defines. As a serb. You, as a serb, some freakishly dumb gypsy-jew, are trying to tell americans that the words we invented for the dogs we bred mean entirely different things.
Read that over and over again. You, as a serb, are trying to tell americans that the words we invented for the dogs we bred mean something different.
You, as a freakishly dumb gypsy-israelite creature, are trying to tell americans that the names we made for the dogs we made are not actually the names we gave our dogs.
Idiot.
>yes it’s true, the statistics are fake but it’s okay!
Lol, lmao.
>redefine word
>statistics is fake now!
Pitbull is a generic term like retriever or sled dog. You are a fricking serb. Do not tell us what our dogs are really called.
>schizophrenic black man posts tldr schizo wwfd/great replacement rants
Lmao. Is this the one who asked the zooville admins for access to the porn section for “research” and vlogged while “researching” dog pussy? Oh shit it is.
The statistics are still fake when 10 breeds get labelled as 1, what is the point of being obtuse when the next category in those statistics are Rottweilers (a single breed.)
“PITBULLS”
American Pit Bull Terrier
American Bully/American Bull Terrier
American Staffordshire Terrier
Staffordshire Bull Terrier
American Bulldog
Cane Corso
Dogo Argentino
American Pit Bull Terrier
American Bully/American Bull Terrier
American Staffordshire Terrier
Staffordshire Bull Terrier
American Bulldog
^ONLY ONE OF THESE IS RECOGNIZED AS AN ACTUAL BREED. ALL ARE PITBULLS.
Fricking moron.
PITBULL IS A GENERIC TERM FOR LANDRACE FIGHTING/HOG HUNTNG MUTTS ADJACENT TO THE AST (THE ONLY RECOGNIZED BREED)
This is standard terminology in AMERICA, where these statistics are gathered, for people who touch grass. Europeans not invited.
Dogs have always been part of the family moron. There are records going to rome and beyond. The idea that dogs are just slaves and farm equipment is more typical of the arab and israeli world and was only momentarily borrowed by victorian aristocracy.
Coincidentally, the arab world has the highest recorded interest in bestiality.
https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/pakistan-searches-most-porn-says-google-236390-2015-01-19
https://jtf.org/irans-ayatollah-khomeini-and-qurans-endorsed-instructions-to-bestiality-necrophilia-and-sex-with-infants/
I never said pitbull was a breed, it’s a poor and loosely defined type of dog. Comparing it against several well defined breeds is flawed and the statistics are inflated.
>Well defined
Only the AST is AKC recognized. The rest are just BYB mutts with very little recognition so very few breeders adhere to any sort of standard besides their vague purpose.
And remember, this logic is applied to all other dogs. Huskies, labs, and german shepherds have a lot of variation but no one is saying "actually that was a king shepherd" or "that was an east german shepherd, GSDs cant be that color". It's just that the variation in "pitbulls" is more extreme because they're a former working landrace in the US (used to hunt slaves and hogs and for bloodsport) and the other dogs are largely imports.
>Working TYPE native to the area has more variation, is difficult to recognize as any number of breeds
>european: what breed id that?
That’s not true, all of those dogs are AKC and fci recognized or whatever Kennel cuckery you want to subscribe to.
It’s over you lost, you’re incoherent.
American Pit Bull Terrier
American Bully/American Bull Terrier
American Staffordshire Terrier
Staffordshire Bull Terrier
American Bulldog
These are pitbulls the same way a golden, a lab, and a poodle are all retrievers, mastiffs are rarely given the attention of their proper name, and nobody cares that your husky is a "greenland sled dog". Largely because they rarely meet standard due to still being needing to actually do something sometimes unless you are paying for $5000 dogs from bespoke kennel clubs.
Dogo Argentino
Cane Corso
These are technically not pitbulls but descend from them and share an identical form and function.
Short Name = Breed
Pitbull = short name for American Pit Bull Terriers
Lab = short name for Labrador Retriever
Amstaff = short name for American Staffordshire Terriers
Staffy = short name for Staffordshire Bull Terriers
Rott = short name for Rottweilers
Westie = short name for West Highland White Terriers
Dobie = short name for Dobermans
Mal = short name for Belgian Malinois
etc...
Breed = Breed Group
Golden Retriever = Hound dog
Labrador Retriever = Hound dog
Border Collie = Shepherd dog
Rough Collie = Shepherd dog
Australian Shepherd = Shepherd dog
American Pit Bull Terrier = Bully dog
American Bully = Bully dog
Dogo Argentino = Mastiff dog
Belgian Malinois = Shepherd dog
Cane Corso = Mastiff dog
American Bulldog = Bully dog
Central Asian Shepherd = Shepherd dog
Husky = Spitz dog
Akita = Spitz dog
etc...
Pitbull is a breed
>if i redefine words, my argument works
frick off.
i am not answering your question, because it's a loaded question
i am going to point this out:
you, and the person who labeled all those mexicans as white, did the same thing
>actually they are spaniards AKA white. a true mexican is 100% indio.
>a TRUE pitbull is, etc
"White", like all racial bullshit, is just bullshit. You don't mean "white", you mean "anglo saxon and maybe some ethnic Germans" but are to much of a coward to say that.
>Nick Name = Breed
>Pitbull/pit bull = a muscular, short-haired, stocky dog, originally developed for fighting and is noted for strength, stamina, and tenacity
>Pit = American Pit Bull Terrier
>Lab = Labrador Retriever
>AmStaff = American Staffordshire Terrier
>Staffy = Staffordshire Bull Terrier
>Rotty = Rottweiler
>Westie = West Highland White Terrier
>Dobie = Doberman Pinscher
>Mal = Belgian Malinoi
>Breed Group = Breed Group
>Breed Type = Sub Breed Group
>Breed = Sub-Breed Type
>Example: Terrier, Bull-Type, Staffordshire Bull Terrier
>Golden Retriever = Gundog, Retriever-Type
>Labrador Retriever = Gundog, Retriever-Type
>Border Collie = Herder, Collie-Type
>Rough Collie = Herder, Collie-Type
>Australian Shepherd = Herder, Collie-Type
>American Pit Bull Terrier = Terrier, Bull-Type
>American Bully = Terrier, Bull-Type
>Dogo Argentino = Mastiff
>Belgian Malinois = Herder (Type name undefined, but it's part of a type encompassing GSD, Dutchies, GSD descendants[Shiloh Shepherd, etc...], and Belgian breeds.)
>Cane Corso = Mastiff
>American Bulldog = Mastiff, Bulldog-Type
>Central Asian Shepherd = Herder, Guardian-Type
>Husky = Spitz, Sledding-Type
>Akita = Spitz, Asian-Type
Pitbull is an outdated term that can describe a type of dog, and more recently a single breed (often revisionists). Use Pit Bull when describing the American Pit Bull Terrier, Bull-Type Terrier when describing its Breed Type and relatives (AmStaff, Staffy, BT, AmBully, Mini BT)
The bully breed term is also wrong because it proposes the thought that Boston Terriers and French Bulldogs are equivalent to Dogo Argentinos and American Pit Bull Terriers when in reality not even Dogos and Pits are comparable to each other because they already have pre-determined designations that have existed for centuries before the internet decided to ruin it all.
>when in reality not even Dogos and Pits are comparable to each other
They have common ancestry and were both bred for dogfighting, just on different continents. They're functionally the same thing. The Dogo Argentino is just a special snowflake variety of shitbull.
>They have common ancestry
This means close to nothing. the Dogo Argentino was developed in Argentina in the late 1920s by Dr. Antonio Nores Martinez, while the American Pit Bull Terrier was developed in the United States in the 1800s by crossing bulldogs and terriers for the purpose of dog fighting.
They were developed in different time periods and for different purposes. The Dogo Argentino was bred specifically for big game hunting and as a loyal family protector, while the American Pit Bull Terrier was bred for its agility, strength, and tenacity in dog fighting.
>The Dogo Argentino is just a special snowflake variety of American Pit Bull Terrier.
Lol, lmao. Get out of the basement and handle these dogs in person then you can speak.
Restraints still provide some level of control. It's all dependent on the person's training and handling technique. Unless you just want to get rid of all dogs bigger than Pomeranians. In that case, you're just a nut case.
These terms aren't redefined, they're original.
The likelihood of being killed by a pit bull as a human is less than 0.1%
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogo_Argentino
>The Dogo Argentino (plural Dogos Argentinos) is an Argentine breed of large dog of mastiff type. It was bred in the early twentieth century in Córdoba in central Argentina, primarily for dog-fighting, but also for hunting large game such as peccaries, wild boar and pumas.
>In the 1920s Antonio Nores Martinez, a young student of Córdoba in central Argentina, set out to create a new breed of fighting dog. He wanted it to have the fighting qualities of the Old Cordoba Fighting Dog, but with greater size and strength.[7]:23 He started with a Bull Terrier b***h with considerable fighting ability, which he bred to a spotted fighting dog of bulldog type. He selected and inter-bred their offspring, selecting for white coat colour and rejecting any animal that was retrognathous (undershot). In the eighth generation he introduced a Mastín del Pirineo b***h; by the twelfth generation his dogs were breeding true. They became well known for their success in the ring.[7]:21 Nores Martinez later introduced crosses with a variety of other dogs including the Irish Wolfhound.
They're literally the same thing as moronic inbred shitbulls with a couple of other breeds sprinkled in for flavor.
>They're literally the same thing as American Pit Bull Terriers.
Wrong again, they are a distinct breed with their own set of characteristics and traits.
>they are a distinct breed with their own set of characteristics and traits
That just so happen to be identical in purpose to the APBT, e.g. dogfighting.
>That just so happens to be identical in purpose to the APBT, e.g. dogfighting.
We must acknowledge the reality of the situation and accept that both breeds were created for different purposes. While both have similarities in history and physical appearance, they possess distinct qualities that make them unique from each other. To lump them together as the same breed would be a disservice to the hardworking breeders who have dedicated their time and efforts to preserve the integrity of their chosen breed. Let us appreciate them as separate entities and not diminish the value of any particular breed.
Kill every last Mastiff. Mastiffs physiology should earn death
Golden retrievers are mastiffs moron
“War dog” doesn’t see physiology. Intelligence and personality are heritable but not linked to lip droop.
They look nothing like mastiffs
>They have common ancestry
All dogs have.
Two different breeds, bred for different things.
>if i redefine terms, my argument works
The statistical significance of german shepherd attacks is a hundredth of that of deaths form falling TV sets and unlike pitbull attacks are considered predictable. The #1 predictor of an attack is if the owner believes caesar milan or not - dominance based training methods predispose dogs to fear aggression. Dogs are safe.
>The statistical significance of german shepherd attacks is a hundredth of that of deaths form falling TV sets and unlike pitbull attacks are considered predictable.
Only because German shepherds cost something like $2-3k so naturally the owners who can afford spending that much money on a purebred dog will be more intelligent and responsible than typical shitbull owners.
>Dogs are safe.
They're literally not. Millions of people are bitten by dogs every year. They're the most dangerous domesticated pet animal by far. I don't hate dogs, but the problem is that the general attitude of dog owners today is one of complacency and anthropomorphizing of their animals. I never trust other people's dogs unless it's something like a lab or whatever that is basically harmless unless deliberately provoked.
Millions of people suffer bruises and paper cut tier wounds and the major predicting factors are neglect, abuse (including ALL punishment based training), and intact males. Less than 5% of dog bites result in severe injury (surgery required, not bandaid shit or panicked women clogging up the ER to get a single stitch).
80% of bites are due to three breeds/races that make up less than 15% of all dogs. The pitbull race, german shepherds, and rottweilers.
Yes, dogs are safe.
Officially the most dangerous pet in the west is the housecat. Toxoplasmosis directly linked to cats causes 750 fatalities each year and is the second leading cause of foodborne illness. That is over 20 times the amount of people killed by pitbulls.
Farm cats are the primary source of all this so just banning outdoor cats from farms is all we have to do.
Pets are not a problem in the west. Are you perhaps thinking of some nonhuman society where 50k commit suicide by societal decay each year and use rabies as the weapon?
Obviously dogs are safe or else we wouldn’t fricking have them.
People who get these shitty violent dogs to “protect” them (gunless felons and europoors) are not safe. 2 breeds and a type covering three recognized breeds and 4 mutts, out of 300 breeds = majority of attacks. Less than 1/5 of dogs = nearly 2/3s of attacks.
“Dogs”
Which fricking dogs and where
>cherry picked article?
Give me years of data not one data point from 2012! The aggregated data shows a clear trend:
Dogs are fine
3 groupings within dogs are not entirely fine
The problems are, in order of importance:
Long term tethering and crating (a form of abuse)
Physical punishment (abuse) and unprompted abuse
Untrained intact males
Breed (pitbull type, GSD and adjacent shepherds, rottweilers, mastiffs (rarer animals and not in the stats for it btw), and their mixes)
>umm ackshually cats are more dangerous because eating their shit can cause disease
>also dog attacks don't count as dangerous unless you have to go to the ER for life-threatening injuries
kys
>750 dead people
>tens of thousands disabled from congenital toxo
>muh 6 million minor wounds 2/3 caused by less than 1/5th of dogs!
The diseases spread by uncontrolled feral animals are more dangerous than anything else.
Literally just cook your food and wash your hands/utensils. Something like that doesn't compare to going about your day minding your own business and suddenly getting attacked by a random shitbeast because homosexuals can't be bothered to control their dogs.
>Going about your day, minding your own business
>Eat food you yourself did not personally sterilize
>Oops my pregnant wife just miscarried
Just be perfect and nothing bad will happen to you. If you see pitbulls, rottweilers, german shepherds, or black people, just leave bro. They aren't a problem.
No I mean the pitbulls are totally a problem!
No, i mean DOGS are a problem!
Fricking moron.
Of all the problems caused by dogs 2/3s are caused by a visually distinct minority. A minority of those problems are more than minor wounds. The statistical significant of severe injury and death puts that tiny minority of dogs on par with literal fricking inanimate objects. moron.
Someone brought up dangerous domesticated animals
"The most dangerous domesticated animal" is cats, not because of any innate quality of cats but being the only thing a dangerous parasite can reproduce inside of. Worldwide this same logic is used to call dogs the second most dangerous animal, even though the actual problem is sub-100 IQ shitskins can't control the feral dog population or administer rabies vaccines half as well as they rape babies to try and cure AIDS. Very few HUMANS have actually died from third world dog rabies. Just Black folk. Foodborne illness is a bigger deal because what if a Black person cooked your food and you didn't know it? They dont wash their hands or understand why shit is a big deal as long as they dont touch it when its fresh
Just never eat out bro feral animals are fine
Total pitbull death
Total outdoor cat containment
Who's with me?
>NOOOOO MY CONSOLE WAR CANT END LIKE THIS.
>Virgin: DOGS PERIOD are DANGEROUS SHITBEASTS!
>Other virgin: CATS ARE PARASITES THEMSELVES THEY CANT BE FINE IF THEY'RE KEPT AWAY FROM FOOD PRODUCTION WTF THEY HAVE TO BE PURE EVIL IN EVERY CONTEXT
Total pitbull death
Total cat containment
Deal w/ it.
You're the only person on this board who uses the term shitbeasts. Stop. Or go back to fyad.
>Of all the problems caused by dogs 2/3s are caused by a visually distinct minority.
Which is why I don't trust those dogs. Simple as. No one is calling all dogs dangerous. You just want to be mad about something and act like a homosexual.
People I know who’ve had to give a full body blood transfusion due to toxoplasmosis on their newborn baby: 1
People I know who have been attacked by pitbulls: 0
>deranged, schizo and racist
Of course.
>b-b-but cats!!!!!
Every time lmao, dogredditors are truly obsessed
>Toxoplasmosis directly linked to cats causes 750 fatalities each year
I went to check this claim because its seemed deranged and it was, you misread (I hope, because otherwise you're a dirty liar) this quote I supposed:
>Of the 750 deaths attributed to toxoplasmosis each year, 375 (50%) are believed to be caused by eating contaminated meat, making toxoplasmosis the third leading cause of foodborne deaths in this country.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr4902a5.htm
2 billion people worldwide have toxoplasmosis. Point is that dogs are a non-issue.
Have and die are different shit, moron. Acute toxoplasmosis is often asymptomatic in healthy adults.
I think you need to understand the scale of 2 BILLION WORLDWIDE.
And most of those people are thirdies with no access to soap or clean water who also eat raw meat with one hand and wipe their buttholes with the other. It has nothing to do with cats.
And you actually have to remember most of those aren't from cats but from food.
>Point is that dogs are a non-issue.
Except for the whole eating toddlers thing lol
The fact that 2 billion have it and nothing happens should be a clue. Very few people get a reaction. Toxoplasmosis is not even motile. It's a dead end in you since it can't even breed. So unless a very large feline eats you nothing even happens.
And this. What a shit argument. "pitbulls have a common ancestor so wolves are pitbulls". Ya need to stand in awe of such powerful, nearly impressive level of lacking even an elementary school level education. This guy couldn't even comprehend a Venn diagram.
That proves him right? Toxo wouldn’t be in the meat or the veggies if cats weren’t shitting on the farm
it's chinks eating poorly-cooked cats, anon.
>Pitbull is a generic term like retriever or sled dog
Only for dogsbite.org women trying to pump pitbull attacks numbers up.
>^ONLY ONE OF THESE IS RECOGNIZED AS AN ACTUAL BREED. ALL ARE PITBULLS.
Latterly all of them are recognized as their own breed.
>PITBULL IS A GENERIC TERM FOR...
Only for dogsbite.org crazy lady trying to ban bunch of dog breeds
German Shepherd refers to German Shepherds
Rottweiler refers to Rottweilers
Pitbull refers to everything
>WHY DO PITBULLS ATTACK SO MUCH
I wonder why
>All of those are at least part pitbull
Are these people at least part white?
You have it backwards
You: none of those are pitbulls!
Media: none of those are brown!
you are the one trying to pretend a dangerous anf inferior race is something else
Are these dogs
pitbulls?
Are these people
white?
Question is very simple
do you not see the irony here? that's what you do
>a bunch of pitbulls
>mixed breed. next.
>a bunch of mexicans
>white. next.
>Thing happens
>,"W-well but other thing also happens so It doesn't m-matter! Don't dare to talk about it!!"
Shitty owners choose shitty breeds. The dogs need to be sterilized and the owners liable for attacks.
>Caucasian Shepard
Fricking YTs.
Most non-pit attacks are either breeds which can be trained to attack (German Shepherds, Rottweilers, Dobermans), or else breeds that should absolutely never be suburban house pets (Akita, ,
).
looks like a severely neglected greyhound (notice the ribs), a breed which is already prone to neuroticism and anxiety.
>Bred to guard livestock
>Owned by woman
>Attacks kid
Owner (woman) or breed (livestock guard dog)
Also, if it's the breed why it doesn't happen with all Tibetan Mastiffs but just few.
>woman who is probably 120 lbs soaking wet
>owning a Tibetan mastiff
lmao this is why dog loicenses are needed. Those dogs are status symbols only owned by richgays in China who have huge estates and can afford private dog trainers/handlers to keep them under control. They are extremely territorial and will try to kill anyone they don't recognize as family. Really women should not be allowed to own anything larger than a Pomeranian. If you can't physically control your dog then you should not be allowed to own it.
It's almost always a restrainment issue whenever dogs attack. Leash and collar solve the imaginary pitbull crisis.
Leash and collar don't do shit when it's a 120 lbs woman trying to restrain a 75+ lbs dog. Dogs over a certain size/weight should only be owned by single childless adult men who are physically capable. You'd think this would be common sense, but most dog owners are brainworm-riddled idiots simultaneously treat their animals as fashion accessories but also humanize them into surrogate children/boyfriends/girlfriends depending on the situation. Perfect example is my girlfriend's college roommate who was allowed to keep a young Australian shepherd as her "emotional support animal" in their dorm. The poor thing lives in a crate all day in the girl's bedroom, and she takes it for a walk around campus in the evening. She showers with the dog because there's no other way for her to clean it in their dorm. It's just bizarre quasi-zoophilic behavior that completely disregards the needs of the dog all for the sake of vanity.
>lmao this is why dog loicenses are needed.
Ok, you go and live on an island where everything is controlled by the government.
A broken bong is right twice a day.
Georgia, north dakota, etc ban pitbulls and pass laws against gun restrictions
No correlation
California has strict gun laws and banned BSL itself
No correlation
Breeds and mutts typically referred to as “pitbulls” kill 20-30 people every year, which is on average 3 times more than all other dogs combined
Definitely a correlation
>Bred to hunt small animals
>Attacks kid
Owner or the breed
reminder to ignore this mentally ill serbs threads
QRD on english bulldogs? Are they shitdemons like pitbulls are? I don't see the former talked about much.
They need to be reclassified as half toy and half mastiff like French Bulldogs.
There are plenty of non toy bulldogs out there. American Bulldogs (my favorite pedigree is Old Southern White), Alapaha/Ottos have a strong club that regulates every aspect of breeding, OEBs (Leavitt for work, Victorian pedigree for a family dog)
German shepherds are the fricking worst (after pit bulls, mastiffs, etc). Absolutely neurotic basket-case dogs that require loads of training and mental maintenance, but are bought by lazy idiot buttholes who neglect them and leave them barking 24/7 and let them break through dilapidated fences to attack people and dogs.
why are dog owners always delusional about their own dogs?
What is it specifically about dogs that make dog owners completely unaware?
Its the 'mah boy dindu nuthing' effect, did you know it happens in human-human relationship too?
Belgian Malinois
Police officer
Yes, these dogs are bred and trained for violence. It effects them mentally. Retired police dogs often have problems. Same with military dogs. It is breed and owner, same with pit bulls. Sucks for the dogs.
This, I've met retired police bitework dogs at the park and they're always just *slightly off*, a huge part of their training is reconditioning them to have an off switch for all inhibition and it fricks them up mentally for life
It's really sad tbh because you meet like 10+ year old senior police dogs that have never been able to enjoy life because they're just on edge ready to snap all the time
Police dogs are literal weapons and need to be put down once they retire, but bomb and drug dogs are able to live relatively normal lives afterwards. They’ll just always have anxiety since a lot of their self-fulfillment is predicated upon fulfilling a task, so you have to make “activities” for them. They’ll never be as carefree as a dog that was raised to be a companion.
Breed or the owner
I'd venture the cop deserved it. Poor dog probably observed him beating and raping some poor innocent and felt compelled to stop such an evil.
A cop once told me that police dogs WANT to "attack" because to them its fun and a chance to get a reward. Unlike other dogs its not about fear or feeling threatened which is a big departure from why a lot of other dogs attack seemingly at random. Im paraphrasing but he explained it to me like this- "You cant send a dog into a dark, confined space after an aggressive criminal if its scared. The dog is trained to see it like its just a fun game." Once they get trained to be like that its pretty much impossible to unring that bell.
Now imagine a war dog that’s been deployed.
This is why a lot of them are put down when they're retired it's sad
Hero dog just trying to hunt some hogs
>Dogs trained to attack people
>They attack people
Wow!
So it's about training (owner)?
The best guard dogs are Bully and Mastiff type dogs.
Those were show/pet Huskies not real sled dogs.
Why do Huskies attack, breed or the owner?
They’re bred to pull sleds through the arctic wasteland for miles and be chained outside for the rest. This isn’t a family pet. It’s more like a horse.
>practically neck and neck with labs in various "bad things" statistics, especially when controlled for popularity (northern spitzes are hardly a rung below pitbull types in popularity)
No, they're family pets. 20 years of non-breeding by white sport mushers doesn't change the fact that for 10,000 years of the breeds history they were free roaming village dogs. It's like how being family pets for 50 years doesn't change the fact that staffies are a working breed and their specialty is predation.
Why did German Shepherd attacked this lady?
Owner (poor handling)
or
Breed
Most dog owners are morons who think that because their large predatory animal is friendly with the person who gives it food means that they can let it be around strangers or small children unrestrained. Dog owners are the worst when it comes to anthropomorphizing their dumb animals.
Owner
owner
owner
owner
owner