>They had feathers. >"No they didn't, that's stupid.

>They had feathers
>"No they didn't, that's stupid. We haven't found evidence of them having feathers."
>picrel
>"Ok ok but they were short and stumpy feathers, like quills, basically hair.. proto-feathers."
>microraptor fossil
>"Ok ok but that's just a one of a kind example of modern feathers."
>How did they thermoregulate?
>"They sunbathed like a lizard"
They don't want to say it, they will never say it; even when we clone a T-rex and it looks like a moronic ostrich pibble creature, they'll say "Maybe we did it wrong..". These things survived in arctic climates and you expect me to believe they just sunbathed through it?
I don't care that much, but still it's stupid. Jurassic park & godzilla ruined an entire generation of paleontologists.

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like the Crumb album

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I feel like dinosaurs looking goofy is pretty obvious. Most of the animals on the earth either look gay or very moronic, there are no cool looking animals, and ones who kind of are often are found to be moronic, like owls and crocs
    Maybe orcas are not that silly, but they are water animals, it's different rules out there, and they are outliers, all of the ocean creatures are morons except of dolphins that are just homosexuals. Possibly also crows are an exception too

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Godzilla is not a dinosaur >:{

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      …yes he is. Although I guess it depends on which Godzilla. All the originals up through Millenium Godzilla is a mutated dinosaur.
      In GMK he’s a zombie spirit of the souls of WWII (stupid).
      In Legendary he’s his own ancient species from way before dinosaurs.
      In than anime movie trilogy and Singular Point and Shin he’s some weird vague god.
      Other than those he’s always been a radioactive mutant dinosaur.

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Tell me true: why tf does JP live rent free in the brains of troony paleo redditors?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      It portrays animals as cool and not gay israeli sissies. They know the might of nature is revered by straight White men so they hate it. Same with Avatar.

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Based pseudosuchia remains uncucked and thoroughly scaly

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine trusting ANYTHING from china. Notice how all these perfectly preserved feathertroony fossils have only been showing up after china industrialized and they get more elaborate over time as sculpting techniques and materials improve. Once crispr gets going they'll be trotting out rainbow chickens with teeth and tails. Well I'm not fooled.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes. It's an insidious communist plot to ruin your childhood. Don't believe their lies.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      What would be their interest to put feathers on dinosaur fossils?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Feminize a common interest for young White boys. Make it seem like plaeo is a justified dynamic life science not just bearded fat gays writing fanfic. Yet another assault on organised religion. Yet another assault on media from the time it was all brilliant White Anglo men writing and filming. Gives china prestige over the West. All of the above and more. It never ends. They're already trying to put huge dick sucking lips on tyrannosaurs. And don't think we don't notice how almost all feather homosexuals are furries.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          nice attempt at throwing us off scaliegay, but your motives are clear as day. you're just sick of birdgays ruining your qt snakefu's art.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          I could agree with you about the attacks against western culture and religion, also about China looking for more prestige.
          But your arguments don't make any sense.
          Why would feathers on dinosaurs be feminine or against youngs, white people or boys?
          What is the connection between animals with big lips and gays? Are fish gay?
          Why would furries prefer feathers to scales? One of the furries favorite "animal" are scaly dragons.
          You seem completely obsessed with culture war and delusional.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Are fish gay?
            Yes, duh.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            By making them look shitty instead of cool like a shark or tiger

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              But feathers by themselves don't make a creature look weak or shitty. Eagles, hawks, and falcons have been
              classic symbols of masculinity & strength across cultures all over the globe for thousands of years. The ancient Hittites used a double eagle as a royal symbol more than 3000 years ago, many ancient Roman Legions went into battle under the Aquilla (pic related), and even today weapons get named after birds of prey, like the F-16 "Fighting Falcon". Feathers on a large therapod predator like yutyrannus don't make it less scary looking.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                You’re 100% right that’s why trannies make fuzzy drag queen t-rexes to piss everyone off. They could make a yuty look cool but they won’t because they want to piss everyone off. That’s it. They’re men and they’re angry others don’t pretend they’re women.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >trannies make fuzzy drag queen t-rexes to piss everyone off
                The woke reaction is getting worse than the wokes themselves.

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Umm you know those came from China right? Where they're communists??

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Make a silly joke reply
      >Next reply says the same thing, but unironically
      Lol

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Unfortunately.

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Jurassic park & godzilla ruined an entire generation of paleontologists.
    No. Literal kid-fricking trannies like you did. We’ve known certain dinosaurs had feathers since the get-go. My old ‘80s dinosaur picture books had feathers on dinosaurs. It’s only recently that weird israelites suddenly started making fuzzy t-rex and fuzzy triceratops and fuzzy brontosaurs, like no obviously fricking not.
    As far as Jurassic Park goes, besides the raptors and gallinumus not having feathers and spino not being on 4 legs it’s easily the best recreation of the animals we have. The same top paleontologists who made Walking With Dinosaurs and shit worked on Jurassic Park too… the Jurassic rex is literally the same thing as the WWD rex… because that’s just what a t-rex looked like. Of course you can speculate the sound and color but other than that we even know what the surface of its hide looked like which pretty much looks like crocodile skin. In fact all said and done I almost think the Peter Jackson t-rexes might be the closest looking to real life. The Jurassic Park rex looks like a “standard” rex you’d find in a textbook, but these were living things with harsh lives and the Peter Jackson ones with the crocodile skin on their backs and the messed up teeth was the most true to life. Even then they’re literally just the JP/WWD rexes but with scars and crooked teeth.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      I agree with you except on the crocodile armor part, dinosaur scales look nothing like that, they look more like the texture of a basket ball

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Who even says this anymore? I haven't seen a feathers vs no feathers argument in 2 years. It seems pretty much everyone agrees "some had feathers, some didn't, others had something inbetween."

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      I see this stuff in documentaries these days.
      They'll only give feathers to those we know for certain had them, and the rest are scaly.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Dinos had no feathers, T Rex dragged its tail, and they all breathed fire
      Fight me

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Is that a man?

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yes it is, behold

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Those aren't scales

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >It's arms are swiveled but have no real uses outside mating display. Instead of assuming they had dense plumage on their arms we're just gonna immediately assume it was completely naked like a plucked chicken.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Idk if this is bait but we know what the topography of carnotaur skin looks like. They were armored, not feathered. And this is a great example of troonery at work. Take a huge dangerous predator like a carnotaur and have it do a cute little mating dance like a bird of paradise. Ever see large predators like leopards or something mate? It’s a dangerous and often violent affair for both animals and they’re always on their guard. A carnotaur could kill another one with one bite, they would not be doing this. Maybe if you wanted to showcase what the arms could do how about signaling to each other during a hunt like hyenas do with their tails? The underside of the arm could be white and they turn it white side up when it’s time to attack or something. Even then these documentaries aren’t supposed to be some pseud fan fiction, they’re supposed to be informative and showcase what we actually know and can derive from fossils. See: WWD.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        you need to be medicated

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *