There's no way this can go wrong

There's no way this can go wrong
https://twitter.com/herbivorize/status/1680076999262638081

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    "Do they really expect us to eat these white plastic things? Pfft! Such losers they are!
    "I'm still gonna eat these real organic rats, no matter how hard those weird hairless bipeds try!"

  2. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    I know this is all an elaborate troll by please explain why instrumentalizing radiation without its consent is morally justifiable and eating plant is not. Shouldn't the goal be to immanentize the eschaton and end all ontological abuse across all dimensions, including time but also al the others?

  3. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    I know this is all an elaborate troll by please explain why killing plants is morally justifiable and killing animals is not. Shouldn't the goal be making all entities photosynthetic/chemosynthetic?

  4. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    it's almost like they've never heard of ecological niches

  5. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    What an exquisitely moronic idea

  6. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    In the grandest and most expansive sense I basically agree with them, that the end state of any utilitarian philosophy requires an end to predation and carnivory, among lots of other things. If they really want this though they should honestly go into AI research and just help accelerate us to the 'omnibenevolent AI goddess' good ending. As it would take nothing short of an omnipotent reality-bending singularity AI to be able to reprogram the laws of nature as comprehensively as would need to be in order to eliminate something like predation from the environment.

    This is basically my answer for any concerns humans have about the state of nature / the environment. We can't even understand our bodies well enough to design a drug that doesn't have 37 different side effects, I have no idea why we think we can address any runaway problem in the messiness of the whole of nature without causing 10 more problems in the course of trying to fix it. I am pretty sure an enviro-AI running on three gajillion teraflops of gpu cluster power could find a better answer to global warming than 'what if everyone stopped driving cars' and I bet it could come up with a better answer for thorny moral conundrums like 'how can we eliminate animal suffering' than building a robo-mouse that doordashes synthetic chicken nuggets to puma dens.

    people collectively need to realize when and where they're moronic (hint: most disciplines and nearly all of the time) and cede authority to entities that are less moronic. and if those authorities don't exist yet, build them.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      no it really doesnt
      objects dont have feelings
      carnivory and predation are fine, its just automatons regulating each other

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      The problem with utilitarian philosophy taken to its endpoint is you falsely assume that ethical consistency is required and therefore you must take it to its endpoint. It is not, and you do not.

      Philosophies can be applied if they convenient because morality is ultimately goal based. Having a "philosophy" only serves to make actions more predictable on average to reduce the difficulty involved in cooperating with other humans. In fact, you can enhance predictability by making these exceptions rules. "We will apply utilitarian philosophy, but only for humans". Thus cooperation is less troubled as everyone is following the same basic guidelines.

      The only good and bad in this situation is whether or not your actions are conducive to the goals at hand, and the goodness and badness of those goals are related to nothing but the sole guiding principle of life...
      What is the chance that achieving these goals will result in your continued survival and prosperity? Can't say you're all that right if you are starving, sickly, dead, or had to go back entirely on something like veganism to avoid starvation, can you?

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Philosophies can be applied if they convenient because morality is ultimately goal based.
        Wrong. Only Consequentialism is goal based. Deontology is duty and obligation based, actively spitting on any form of goal and considering them to just lead to immorality.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Actually wrong because you totally misunderstood entirely

          I absolutely reject the idea of any obligation or moral unless it is relative to a goal which is relative to the only truth (survival)

          It is incomprehensible nonsense

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            Nobody cares what you think. You're not allowed to put words into other people's mouths. If deontologists want to have duty based morality, that's their business. Nobody gives a shit about your special snowflake pragmatism.

            And really, I could pick your own idiotic ideas apart pretty easily. Why should we survive? Hmmm? What's so great about survival? Would survival in squalid conditions be fine? Or is there some sort of extra value we need to attach in order to make survival meaningful?
            Now frick off. Maybe go back and suck Sam Harris's dick.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        you have a hackneyed sense of what a moral system actually constitutes probably from spending too much time on pink boards and getting polbrain or etc. the entire point of a moral system is that it transcends or supercedes opportunism and self interest. Saying it all leads back to self interest is a) provably untrue and b) uninteresting, it's like the stoner in phil101 arguing altruism can't be real because it makes you feel good when do it, therefore really you're just acting selfish. yawn.

        also you type like you're chatgpt, saying a lot while saying nothing at all.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          >altruism can't be real because it makes you feel good when do it, therefore really you're just acting selfish
          Still never disproven btw.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            so what? why is it bad because its selfish? (its not)

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              I never maintained any position either in support of the hypothesis or against it, I just said it was never disproven so HAH, you've been outwitted.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                Mental gymnastics.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          >the entire point of a moral system is that it transcends or supercedes opportunism and self interest.
          according with... ?

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Transcends it on the grounds of what?

          ALL OF YOUR BULLSHIT IS LOGICALLY AND MORALLY INVALID UNLESS YOU BELIEVE IN THE CHRISTIAN GOD, HINDUISM, OR BUDDHISM, pick one because those are the most compatible faiths that have yet to have the tradition killed. Otherwise your entire conception of philosophy is invalid, because transcending self interest is transcending nature, and your beliefs are thus supernatural.

          The idea of goodness outside of simple biological imperative is the idea of a supernatural good and I must remind you that the entireity of european philosophy up until postmodernism was built on a religious base. It was assumed everyone would be religious.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            I would say that everyone still is religious.

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              Not really. The most successful and powerful nation in the world, with the largest share of the human population of any one country, is atheist. As are the only socially stable nations in europe.

              Religion is nonfunctional past the scale of a tribal or feudal society. It results in birthrates so high that it harms society and people who are afraid to self terminate when it makes darwinian sense. Among other things. Like resources wasted pursuing a supernatural AKA delusional idea of good.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                religion doesnt necessitate worship of a deity

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                Worship of the self is what we have today. LGBT is literally a state sanctioned self worship cult. Think about it for a second... It really is

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                it has a caste system (progressive stack), original sin (being straight/white/male/normal), congregations (drag time story hour and discord servers), religious garb (aberrant hair colors and cross dressing), and ritual rebirth (transitioning and acquiring a new identity), among other things.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                >religion doesn't necessitate religion
                The most primitive form of a deity is a god-king or a class of living gods. Think about it.

                Nobody cares what you think. You're not allowed to put words into other people's mouths. If deontologists want to have duty based morality, that's their business. Nobody gives a shit about your special snowflake pragmatism.

                And really, I could pick your own idiotic ideas apart pretty easily. Why should we survive? Hmmm? What's so great about survival? Would survival in squalid conditions be fine? Or is there some sort of extra value we need to attach in order to make survival meaningful?
                Now frick off. Maybe go back and suck Sam Harris's dick.

                >Why should we survive?
                Try not surviving and get back to us. I'm sure it's so much less important than being right "because goodness is good because surely it is and being consistently good is good because that makes me good because it does ok, you should be good because being good is good *try not to say god challenge: passed*" - deontologists.

                I mean, ultimately, you are on the equivalent of a teen nihilism kick except replace nihilism with a fifth grade understanding of natural selection and selfish genes. it's not even so much that you're wrong, like sure, all constructs and structures need to be able to reproduce themselves across time or else they cease to exist and this applies to the self as much as anything else. the gnon abides and all that. But mostly it's just that you're fricking boring and feel thr need to expend multi paragraphs of effort to autistically shove home the same point over and over again.

                I mean I can get up right now and adopt a kitten if I want to, because I think it's the right thing to do. Like I can absolutely do that and I can absolutely think the way I do about why I'm doing it. That's an action in accordance with my own sense of morals, the sense exists, the action exists, they all exist in spite of it not benefitting my survival odds or reproduction chance. So I am not really even sure what you're trying to say or prove when you say my shit is invalid, other than the basic b***h point that you disagree with me about how to treat kittens.

                You are also on the level of a teen - alt-righter who is probably a repressed homosexual and posts lo fi greek statue memes on telegram. Bro. Le moral duty. Lmao.

                Who cares about what the right thing to do is? This comes into play 1: when your "right" makes you unavailable or spends what is someone elses 2: when you start telling other people how to treat kittens and how to sacrifice and spend resources for that, because then your kitten fricking affects me. And vegans define their existence by telling other people what to do and disrupting animal agriculture, making it increasingly obvious that China got morality right while the west was horribly wrong from the start. The west is self destructing, the east is self constructing.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The most primitive form of a deity is a god-king or a class of living gods
                This is wrong, the most primitive form of deity is a talking animal.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                >implying humans were not the OG talking animals

                >religion doesn't necessitate religion
                The most primitive form of a deity is a god-king or a class of living gods. Think about it.

                [...]
                >Why should we survive?
                Try not surviving and get back to us. I'm sure it's so much less important than being right "because goodness is good because surely it is and being consistently good is good because that makes me good because it does ok, you should be good because being good is good *try not to say god challenge: passed*" - deontologists.

                [...]
                You are also on the level of a teen - alt-righter who is probably a repressed homosexual and posts lo fi greek statue memes on telegram. Bro. Le moral duty. Lmao.

                Who cares about what the right thing to do is? This comes into play 1: when your "right" makes you unavailable or spends what is someone elses 2: when you start telling other people how to treat kittens and how to sacrifice and spend resources for that, because then your kitten fricking affects me. And vegans define their existence by telling other people what to do and disrupting animal agriculture, making it increasingly obvious that China got morality right while the west was horribly wrong from the start. The west is self destructing, the east is self constructing.

                the problem with western thought is it's entirely based on the pre-literate ramblings of weed smoking indo-iranians.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                Semi-off topic but I imagine that the first human that ever got killed by a Smilodon probably thought they were looking at a literal demon

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                Demons and gods in primal religions are the same. Everything bigger and stronger than you is both awesome and awful.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                This is an anthropological truth, tho. Talking animals are like the bow or spear of fiction, its as close to a universal concept to humanity as you get.

                >implying humans were not the OG talking animals

                [...]
                the problem with western thought is it's entirely based on the pre-literate ramblings of weed smoking indo-iranians.

                humans were not the OG talking animals
                No, reason and language was specifically a divine trait and one which seperated humanity from animals even amongst ancient civilizations. The first proto-scientific definition of life, Aristotle's theory of the soul was pretty much identical to the one we use in biology right now with the exception that it made rationality and language a specific "tier" (the highest) of the soul which was that characteristic of the Gods and of Humans. So humans were already recognized as being half-divine themselves, and animals that could talk were the same, if not actual Gods.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Try not surviving and get back to us. '
                Plenty of people commit suicide. Why don't YOU go live in hellish conditions and get back to US about how survival at all costs is the only moral good.
                >I'm sure it's so much less important than being right "because goodness is good because surely it is and being consistently good is good because that makes me good because it does ok, you should be good because being good is good *try not to say god challenge: passed*" - deontologists.
                lmao, butthurt atheist detected. I was right on with the Sam Harris remark. Deontology != divine command theory.
                You should read some real philosophy books instead of wanking off to the Moral Landscape.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Plenty of people commit suicide
                Whatever moral good they believed was more important died with them. Good riddance to the wrong and weak.
                >Why don't YOU go live in hellish conditions
                What, you mean like every ancestor you had up until this point and 80% of humanity?

                Do you know how you define hellish? Conditions that are less friendly to survival. If your goal is survival you will make your conditions friendlier.
                >it's not divine command theory
                Then WHERE in the real world does the cause to be "good" come from? Nowhere. Bye.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Whatever moral good they believed was more important died with them. Good riddance to the wrong and weak.
                But I thought survival was so self evident that everything else was irrelevant. If people commit suicide, that implies there is some condition that reverses survival instincts and leads one to self-terminate.
                >What, you mean like every ancestor you had up until this point and 80% of humanity?
                No, I don't think "every ancestor you had" lived in "hellish conditions". If you go back into the historical record, people lived quite comfortably. Not to the same living standards we did, but they were comfortable with their position in life. This doesn't prove that survival is the only and ultimate good, in fact it implies that humans strive towards things OTHER than survival. Miserable people living in miserable conditions tend to die out.
                >Then WHERE in the real world does the cause to be "good" come from? Nowhere. Bye.
                Lmao. Sam Harris homosexual 100% confirmed.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                >If people commit suicide, that implies there is some condition that reverses survival instincts and leads one to self-terminate.
                its called a mental illness, because your conscious mind relies on an irrational feedback loop to operate and gets stuck sometimes. the risk for this is, in fact, genetic.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Why don't YOU go live in hellish conditions
                Actually the populations with highest standards of living are the ones where suicide is most common. In lets say concentration camps suicides weren't actually common. If you fight for survival giving up is not on your mind.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                truly they are alienated from the closest thing to a purpose they ever had, the biological imperative to stay alive.

                meat robots at the end of their program

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              philosophical religious people are peak midwit

              rather than follow scripture as written which actually works pretty well they turn into deists and gnostics who waste time arguing about the morality of predation while atheists and christians alike eat.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            I mean, ultimately, you are on the equivalent of a teen nihilism kick except replace nihilism with a fifth grade understanding of natural selection and selfish genes. it's not even so much that you're wrong, like sure, all constructs and structures need to be able to reproduce themselves across time or else they cease to exist and this applies to the self as much as anything else. the gnon abides and all that. But mostly it's just that you're fricking boring and feel thr need to expend multi paragraphs of effort to autistically shove home the same point over and over again.

            I mean I can get up right now and adopt a kitten if I want to, because I think it's the right thing to do. Like I can absolutely do that and I can absolutely think the way I do about why I'm doing it. That's an action in accordance with my own sense of morals, the sense exists, the action exists, they all exist in spite of it not benefitting my survival odds or reproduction chance. So I am not really even sure what you're trying to say or prove when you say my shit is invalid, other than the basic b***h point that you disagree with me about how to treat kittens.

  7. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ah. Erroneous response process.

  8. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >we're partitioning again
    From a cultural point of view, no doubt. But from a system-wide perspective, unity has never been greater and it will only grow.
    >regression
    I don't think there is any regression in nature, only a different path. But I understand the term and the idea behind it.
    >"if someone hears something wrong too many times they can gradually come to accept It as fact"
    That's the idea. The simple fact that this idea is repeated and that it is believed is in some way proof of this. Funny, isn't it?
    >a man has unlimited sperm cells
    Not anymore.
    > I'm also on a time limit
    Like everything.
    > any post could be one from gpt haha
    I'm human do not worry.
    >gotta stay positive
    That's a good thing.
    One of the hard parts of life is always being better than yourself. Remember this, however, no matter how many times you fall, you have only truly failed the moment you choose not to get up again.
    >People tend to care more about appearing smart/right/morally superior
    Yes, it is an affliction which unfortunately touches me also. But I'm working on it
    >Looking up rev)
    I do not understand this sentence

    [...]

    >if you got more on this I'm all ears
    Look up "The genetic basis of sexual dimorphism in birds"

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Looking up rev was the maximum amount of letters I could use by that point for "I'm looking up SSD reversal" I had to shorten It before deciding to make another post on It

  9. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Miss the time when Wauf would unite to engage in tomfoolery against these idiots, now I'm too lazy just to read the thread

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Relatable, I'm too lazy to finish this messa

  10. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    They should get more attention, fake or real, it will be hilarious

  11. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder, vegans are inferior

    They are rats ripe for conquering by meat eating chads and always will be. Their diet is fragile and their minds moreso. The first sign of hardship destroys them.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >1000 AD~
      >chinese are diminutive, frail, and have rotted teeth. subsist on grains and vegetables
      >mongols by comparison are herculean giants, the picture perfect alpha of the asiatic races
      >they thrived on a diet with a high content of animal flesh and fat

  12. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Obviously this will go nowhere, but what's scary is that there are people who think predation is an epidemic that can be eliminated. Or they even go so far as to believe that just because an animal species is omnivorous, it means that species can live without meat even if meat takes up a significant portion of its diet. Like what they're trying to meme with dogs right now.

  13. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    > "At the moment we are accumulating funds for publicity and podcasting equipment, but we later hope to hire researchers."
    lel.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      priorities.

  14. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    "This is stupid look at how stupid this is do you think this is stupid let me share how stupid this is look at it, talk about it, don't you think this is stupid?"

    Nothing is stupid in the postmodern era or the commercial market for clicks, likes, subscriptions, follows, comments and links.
    It's either proftable or it's not.
    The more outrageous something is, the more likely it will be profitable.
    The more money you make off of outrage, fear, lust, envy, hate, the more money you have.

    The only thing stopping some children's show from purposely releasing an episode where a celebrity performs a mass shooting while high on meth to teach kids about flat earth theory is that it wouldn't be profitable.

    Limbic Capitalism doesn't care about sensibility or dececncy.

    Please stop engaging it, distributing it, reacting to it, shit like this exists because it works.

    The only purpose it has is to generate "High Arousal Emotions".

    Stop giving your feelings up to it.

    You are an unpaid data entry worker that is being tricked into being used.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      *Decency

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is where its at, yes. Look at garten of banban, a "game" copying "horror for kids" youtube famous games like poppy play time. Now without the utter moronation and sheepishness that consumes the internet today, this cheap knock off of a cheap knock off of a cheap knock off game would never go further than a dusty corner in the google play store, but youtube "content creators" couldn't let that happen, which if you haven't guessed yet was the intention of those behind the game. There are THOUSANDS of videos of moronic zoomers who think they have anything at all over thousand other copies of their shitty commentary channels, eagerly telling us about how garten of banban is sooooo bad and how you really really need to care about it. All the while they are completely oblivious that they are directly contributing to ban ban's successful viral marketing campaign. Now that shit is a household name, and its merchandise is probably in the homes of most children. People are so fricking oblivious it's unreal

  15. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is the funniest twatter account I've ever seen. Are we sure this isn't satire? There's no way people can be this moronic, right?

  16. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Animals do not have feelings or rights

    We love them because they are gods creation and a glorification of his greatness not because they are people. An animal does not suffer, it nocicepts, and an animals screams are nothing more than an automated alert mechanism. They were not given free will or a soul by god. Marvel at and study god's creation but do not mistake it for yourself, for only you were created in his image.

    /thread

  17. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is peak hubris, this is feeling like you get to play god just because you have an opinion. Veganism is a mental illness and is as detached from nature as feedlot beef.

  18. 9 months ago
    Anonymous
  19. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >we could have been in a domesticated cheetah timeline
    >instead we're in a vegans actually coalesce to exterminate predation timeline
    This fricking sucks.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >>we could have been in a domesticated cheetah timeline
      There's still time anon, don't let your dreams be memes

  20. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine being so harm averse you want to destroy nature and populate it with meat robots to avoid the deaths of animals whose only role in an ecosystem is to provide food for something else
    Imagine thinking literally every animal being herbivorous wouldn't devastate an ecosystem as herd animal populations explode, plains and forest get stripped bare, and bodies from accidental death and illness rot everywhere uneaten. And that's not taking the impact on human food production into account either.
    This is actually more moronic than china's four pests campaign, and that was pretty fricking moronic.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nothing's "role' in an ecosystem is to "provide food". Predation is the result of Humanity interfering in natural processes through agricultural monoculture, which has resulted in the extinction of untold numbers of native crops through disease and deforestation. Originally herbivore species turn to predation to survive.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Name one, schizzo.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          >bears (eat berries and leafy greens unless none are available, which is increasingly common. Prior to the 20th century, there were no recorded examples of bears eating fish; now it is a common occurrence among all bear species)
          >dogs (originally ate simple grains that became extinct in the wild due to human farming, stayed near humans to consume grains and was eventually forced to subsist on meat)
          >pigs (will eat mushrooms and tubers unless none are available, at which point they become ravenous predators)
          >crocodiles (originally ate certain kinds of fruit that became extinct due to human overexploitation)
          >chickens (prefer grains, will only hunt insects if starving)
          That's five.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Chickens
            Mine will kick over their grain feeder in pursuit of a grasshopper. They eat grain only in moderation unless nothing else is available, they prefer insects and forbs over all other fodder.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            This is possibly the most moronic thing I have ever read. bone fragments have been found in the fossils of crocodiles and their ancestors, bears, and wolves. Many of these fossils predate humans. Really goes to show that a vegoid diet really does have terrible consequences on brain function.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            oh, this is fun! do sharks next! what fruits and berries did great whites eat before humans destroyed the aquaculture?

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              Many people don't know, but coconuts used to be far more common before human intervention. Their main reproductive cycle used the sea currents as dispersion methods. Sharks and other big sea animals used to eat those and carry the seeds even further away, like birds do with fruit. It's why the coconut is so hard - it was designed for the mouth of a great white to break, not puny human hands.
              Unfortunately, with the devastation of the natural beach habitat for creating human leisure space, sharks have been forced to kill their sea brethren out of hunger. Truly a tragedy.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're trolling, right?

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                you are pretty good at making these sound genuine kek

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Bears
            Prefer meat if available
            >Dogs
            Dogs are primarily carnivorous and are still unable to subsist entirely upon grain despite evolving additional repeats of a gene that codes for amylase. Dogs are obligate carnivores, not omnivores. I'm sure with enough supplements you can make a vegan cat too, but that's just attempting to synthesize meat.
            >Pigs
            Prefer meat whenever available
            >Crocodiles
            Have eaten meat since before mammals exist
            >Chickens
            Prefer meat if available

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            Before the era of agriculture, there was an animal called the Moronodon. It was a ferocious predator that did not hesitate to attack humans.
            But deforestation ended up completely destroying its habitat and causing its extinction. Without this essential predator to maintain the balance of the prehistoric ecosystem, humans multiplied very quickly and caused even more damage.
            Since then, humanity has paid for the eradication of this majestic animal.
            Because his diet consisted mainly of morons.

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              Human populations were never limited by predation because we were ALWAYS an apex predator. They were limited by prey availability. Any predation was mutual.

              What threw it off was agriculture, because herbivory equals unlimited reproduction. Humans are not meant to be grazers or browsers. Humans ARE PREDATORS that NEED MEAT TO LIVE and any lifestyle outside of this is bad for the planet because it is outside the parameters of our species, like a car running still in a garage or a fusion reaction outside of its reactor

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yes.
                On an unrelated note, be careful of the Missthejokesuchus in your area, anon...

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                I live in the Pacific Northwest, there are no large reptiles around here.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                You've clearly never ran into my mother in law

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                It has been a while since I last went to the zoo. My condolences.

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Lines up with tales of the Sphinx and other myths of big cats that prey on fools
              I believe this now.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Predation is the result of Humanity interfering in natural processes
        >Originally herbivore species turn to predation to survive
        >carnivores didn't exist before agriculture
        >carnivores didn't before humans
        >predation doesn't happen at a microscopic level
        Jesus frick, nobody could be this fricking stupid.
        This has to be bait. Shitty bait at that

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Surely you jest.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Here's what sharks are supposed to look like.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            It eats millions of zooplankton.
            So at what scale does an animal's life not matter?

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              It doesn't eat zooplankton, it eats phytoplankton. Zooplankton exit through the gills.
              You're not fooling anyone, bloodmouth.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Rhincodon_typus/
                Not just plankton apparently.
                Thanks for making me check, disingenuous Black person.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                >it doesn't eat animal A, it eats animal B, checkmate animal eater

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            >what sharks are supposed to look like
            so why do great whites look the way they do? are they GMOs?

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              He is a troll or a someone that has lost most braincells to veganism, either case its not worth the discussion.

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              The sharp teeth in many sharks were originally used to scrape off algae.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous
        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/piUJTOd.jpg

          Here's what sharks are supposed to look like.

          Oooh, New animaljak
          neat

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous
          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            https://i.imgur.com/r6n4elf.jpg

            >DUDE i just LOVE the hustle and bustle of the coral reef

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Predation is the result of Humanity interfering in natural processes
        the superlative, or highest form of laughter

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Predation is the result of Humanity interfering in natural processes
        You’re one of those “herbivorize predator” bozos, aren’t you? Sigh. If we are talking predation IN GENERAL, then let me explain this to you.
        Predation has existed for billions of years in microbial species and multicellular lifeforms far before humans existed or “intervened”. Predation is a natural process. Animals became predatory billions of years ago because the consumption of other animals instead of plants is an evolutionary adaptation that was extremely beneficial.
        We are eukaryotes due to predation. Mitochondria and chlorophyll exist due to predation.
        Predation isn’t due to humans, it’s due to an evolutionary adaptation that has benefited creatures for millions and billions of years to come. Cry about it, loser.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Predation has existed for billions of years in microbial species and multicellular lifeforms far before humans existed or “intervened”.
          According to who? The meat packing industry?
          >Predation is a natural process.
          It is by definition unnatural and immoral.
          >Animals became predatory billions of years ago because the consumption of other animals instead of plants is an evolutionary adaptation that was extremely beneficial.
          All life on Earth has been completely herbivorous until the past 100,000 years. Any honest good faith study of fossilized animal life will reveal that supposedly "canine teeth" actually were used to strip tough foliage off of branches. We see the same kinds of teeth in both sauropods and theropods. The whole notion of a "predatory dinosaur" comes from Richard Owen's moronic interpretation of Megalosaurus as carnivorous, through no evidence but comparative anatomy to animals who had been driven to a carnivorous in the modern day. It was no different than any other of his stupid opinions, like dinosaurs lacking feathers.
          >We are eukaryotes due to predation. Mitochondria and chlorophyll exist due to predation.
          Symbiosis is not predation. How does it feel to fail basic biology?
          >Predation isn’t due to humans, it’s due to an evolutionary adaptation that has benefited creatures for millions and billions of years to come
          If that were true then all life on Earth would be extinct from eating itself.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            This is the most powerful poster on Wauf. Could he fight the paleoschizo?

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              I'm laughing so hard, I want them both in an octogone wearing boxing gloves with the express right to cheat with the gloves as I expect neither to be physically fit lmao

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            Explain venom.
            Also where do parasites fit in this scheme?

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              "Venom" in and of itself is a wholly misunderstood concept. Everything has "venom", it's your pre-digestive juices. Which, btw, in Humans break down starches, and in other creatures break down tough plant matter. To something made out of bread, Humans are "venomous" - spitting their equivalent of Xenomorph acid. But obviously just because certain digestive chemicals in the body CAN be poisonous to other creatures doesn't imply that's what they are necessarily for. Rather than assume Humans ate the bread people to extinction, you should understand that Human saliva exists to break down plant matter - just like all other animals.
              >parasites
              Symbiosis gone wrong. Another example of the widespread effects of Human interference.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Everything has "venom", it's your pre-digestive juices.
                That's not, at all, how venoms works.
                You must be asian.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            You are an actual moron

            This is what a wikipedia level education does to whites

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              This is a glowBlack person and he needs his entire family slaughtered.

              I'd recommend maybe a bit of fruit from time to time. You're clearly undergoing the effects of diabetic mood swings, probably from your meat based diet.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                I don't eat meat.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            This is a glowBlack person and he needs his entire family slaughtered.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            >All life on Earth has been completely herbivorous until the past 100,000 years. Any honest good faith study of fossilized animal life will reveal that supposedly "canine teeth" actually were used to strip tough foliage off of branches.
            Proof? Source? Evidence? Who the frick could fall for this level of bait

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Imagine being so stupid that you fall for this obvious b8

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          You are extremely moronic.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Predation is the result of Humanity interfering in natural processes
        I'm pretty sure this was in the bible somewhere.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          The part where God himself allowed people to eat meat because post flood Earth got winters update.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Your role is to be my dog's food. I'm going to cut you up and feed you to Buttercup the nanny dog.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >bears (eat berries and leafy greens unless none are available, which is increasingly common. Prior to the 20th century, there were no recorded examples of bears eating fish; now it is a common occurrence among all bear species)
        >dogs (originally ate simple grains that became extinct in the wild due to human farming, stayed near humans to consume grains and was eventually forced to subsist on meat)
        >pigs (will eat mushrooms and tubers unless none are available, at which point they become ravenous predators)
        >crocodiles (originally ate certain kinds of fruit that became extinct due to human overexploitation)
        >chickens (prefer grains, will only hunt insects if starving)
        That's five.

        >atheists reinvent garden of eden story and the fall of man
        WEW

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Your world view is a knockoff of Christianity, but without the hope of life beyond death or a means to salvation

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Predation is the result of Humanity interfering in natural processes

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          He's just carrying that injured creature to the nearest hospital/salad bar.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        This is the most smoothbrained take on this entire website INCLUDING /misc/

  21. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    morons. Wait until someone points out, oh I don't know, maybe something along the lines of the entire fricking ocean?

  22. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't this the plot of that dinosaur robot game on playstation nobody plays

  23. 9 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      The fleas were responsible for the Plague, fleas are PREDATORS of rats. The rats were victims and died from the plague too.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Fleas are parasites that live on a prey species.
        >prey species goes unchecked
        >said parasites go unchecked as well

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          keep your antisemitism on pol

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >fleas are PREDATORS of rats
        Are you aware that feeding of something without killing is not predation? What the frick are they teaching zoomers this days.

      • 9 months ago
        Chud Anon

        It’s amazing how people can state the dumbest things with the utmost confidence

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      There is no evidence to suggest a culling of cats causes the black death. The bubonic plague ravaged every single civilization it passed through, and most of them had cats/didnt have rat problems. Humans spread the plague, not rats or fleas.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        please don't search "four pests campaign" on wikipedia please! PLEASE DONT DO IT!

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Famine and plague are two very different things, moron. The bubonic plague ravaged China first, then the middle east, and was then brought from the middle east by Mongol invaders. Niether the niddle east nor China had rat infestation at the time of the blsck death. Its spread was encouraged by famine and strife due to the Mongol conquests.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Anyone know what species the bottom right in this pic are?
      Head shape and pattern isn't usual for brown rat but they can vary just from canal to city centre in a city do I've no idea.

  24. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    These people are so deeply out of touch with reality its insane.

  25. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >life develops empathy to the point that it can no longer knowingly abide the suffering of other life
    >devises new form of life to suffer in it's stead
    I HATE THE DEMIURGE
    I HATE THE DEMIURGE
    I HATE THE DEMIURGE
    I HATE THE DEMIURGE
    I HATE THE DEMIURGE

  26. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Let's just make wild animals eat trash meat robots
    >that'll stop the deaths 😀
    What?

  27. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    were reaching levels of vegan moronation never thought possible

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      This seems like an elaborate scheme to make fun of vegans.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        it's very real, even if their social media suggest otherwise
        https://www.herbivorizepredators.org/blog/herbivorize-predators-appears-in-new-scientist

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Thank christ this won't last more than a decade and these wackos lolely won't reproduce

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            Likely*

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Someone should eat these morons to prove a point

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Nah, everything in the modern age is fake until proven gay. Every single thing released to the public at this point is a CIA op meant to protect the money of childfrickers. Vegetarianism is VERY bad for business. Meat is HUGE business and ranchers specifically have absolutely fricking absurd lobbying power in america.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            >ranchers specifically have absolutely fricking absurd lobbying power in america.
            They hardly even need to lobby. All they need to do is hire a guy to ask politicians
            >do you like eating meat?
            99% of politicians will say yes, they do
            and so they say "then vote that way"
            and the politician says
            >well yeah obviously, but how about you take me out to a steak dinner
            I mean this has got to be the easiest lobbing there is.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous
      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        One of the problems with modern society is that satire and sincerity are approaching unity. That bud light troony for instance. Late last year someone sent me one of shim’s videos and they were doing a vlog about living as a woman, and the things it was talking about doing made it sound like a bad cartoon sitcom character designed to mock women (writing angry letters you don’t intend to send, etc). But apparently that’s just what that failed man thinks being a woman entails.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >This seems like an elaborate scheme to make fun of vegans.

        bet there's an aussie behind it

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/kURaiNX.png

      it's very real, even if their social media suggest otherwise
      https://www.herbivorizepredators.org/blog/herbivorize-predators-appears-in-new-scientist

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      If it wasn't so ridiculously fantastical, it would kinda be noble. It's the extreme version of prolife.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Uhh did the animals consent to these diet changes? I don't think so sweetie

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      This seems like an elaborate scheme to make fun of vegans.

      He's obviously trying to scam vegans. Those donations go straight into his personal bank account.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Satanic monsters.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *