The Absolute state of science

Has anyone else noticed this? I was browsing large bird species and saw that it referred to ostriches as "The largest living species of dinosaur" and found pic related from another link.
What the frick is wrong with these people that they see a bird of literally any kind and start calling it a dinosaur? it's like people who refer to T-rex as "giant chickens" or try to argue hat ALL dinos had feathers. It's so cringe and just reeks of reddit "science" from morons who who just watch yutube essays and don't listen to actual paleontologists who have been arguing against these things forever. i even edited the ostrich article to remove the statement that they are dinosaurs. If anything is a fricking living dinosaur it's a crocodile, not a God damn ratite.

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >jewpedia
    >science
    You are the one at fault here, Anon.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >If anything is a fricking living dinosaur it's a crocodile, not a God damn ratite.
    This is either bait or an actual lead poisoned boomer

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Behold, the largest theropod of it's time.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You went to a page about largest dinosaurs and then complained it listed the largest living dinosaur. What did you expect would happen?

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Does this mean whales ARE in fact fish?
    This is a 100% serious question.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Whales are technically fish. In technical discussions, they are literally lobe finned fish. So are all mammals.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      yes, it also means that insects are arachnids
      mollusks are annelids

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      A certain type of fish yes. Anything with a backbone is technically more related to a teleost fish than teleost fish are to cartilaginous or jawless fish. Splitting even further, out of the jawless fish, hagfish can potentially get out of being labeled as fish or even vertebrates since they don’t have vertebrae.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    oh my god shut the frick up homosexual
    birds are dinosaurs get over it
    you have a fricking 4 year old's understanding of taxonomy.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No, they're not and they never will be. You can scream this all you want, but it can never be true. Of the set of homosexuals, (You) is a subset, however.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        they literally are though

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >i even edited the ostrich article to remove the statement that they are dinosaurs.
    wikiban incoming

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fascinating jannies felt the need to delete this one post:

    https://desuarchive.org/an/thread/4734422/#q4735684

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Your post was found to be evolutionarily unfit.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    That’s a question with quite a long winded answer, one not wholly appropriate here, but let’s just say they’re acting in complete accordance with what their religion tells them

    [...]

    Why would they kill the global south

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    This is really interesting and it's starting to open my eyes, but I do have to ask,
    To what end are they doing all this? And who exactly is the, specifically?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      He's a known troll, hide thread and move on.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    @4735426
    don’t respond to me maggot it was funny it’s not that serious

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Threadly Reminder that cladism started in the 60s (probably by the CIA) as a way to undermine Linnaean taxonomy with "subjective" standards of classification and everyone in mainstream STEM these days is a midwit moron that just does whatever they're told.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Hmm that does sound like them, it certainly wouldn’t be the first time they helped to tear down ‘traditional’ modes of thought and replace it with nonsense that makes no sense if you think about it for more than 5 minutes.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Since the vaccine holocaust science is just a sick (insider) joke anyway

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Technically, the bee hummingbird is a dinosaur itself, as all modern living birds are, making the new species the smallest extinct dinosaur.

    That's your science.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have determined from this thread that paleo-science is fricking moronic and I'm hopping off the evolution train

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Threads discussing dinosaurs should be an instant 2 week-long ban at this point.

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Taxonomically birds are a subgroup of dinosaurs, specifically a subgroup of dromaeosauridae
    >If anything is a fricking living dinosaur it's a crocodile
    Crocodillians are archosaurs (the stem group all lizards, crocodiles, alligators, caiman, dinosaurs and snakes belong to), but not dinosaurs

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >archosaurs (the stem group all lizards, crocodiles, alligators, caiman, dinosaurs and snakes belong to)
      >lizards
      >snakes
      kek'd

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Truly, a sickening example of squamate erasure.

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Birds are ancient why do you take issue with their evolution being greater than ours? Let me guess its your religion that says you are more complex huh? But you aren't are you? Birds every single one of them is more complex than you and that upsets your low iq religious brain huh?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'd hate to be an animal like that.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Holy shit its an orthodox priest

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        e-girlng at your life miserable reprobate. Enjoy hell yuo reprobate troony homosexual

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          most groomed atheist

          >Get BTFO
          >Well w-w-well! An atheist is fat! So that's all of you!
          Not only are for more christians fatter, dumber, and uglier (it's called florida and texas), you mistake morally directionless anti-christians AKA laveyan satanists for all atheists.

          An atheist is anyone who does not believe in a god. There are entire religions, ones more successful than yours that don't get their holy sites struck by lightning or their peoples plunged into pointless wars over a strip of desert every 5 years, that do not believe in any gods. Coincidentally, such a religion is in far better harmony with science (also known as "observable, provable facts") than anything abrahamic (cults that have grown men chop up young boys penises).

          >Zen and science are both based upon empirical observations of the world.
          >Zen and science both tell us that there is no separation between humans and the world around us.
          >The Buddha taught that everything is connected and constantly changing. These fundamental observations of the world are shared by ecology and evolution.
          The more you like animals and nature, the more you are obligated to be a buddhist.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Where is that one based schizo who calls creator "gods" lying demons when we need him?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      most groomed atheist

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Birds are ancient why do you take issue with their evolution being greater than ours? Let me guess its your religion that says you are more complex huh? But you aren't are you? Birds every single one of them is more complex than you and that upsets your low iq religious brain huh?

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >thread about dinos
    >half of it is about trannies

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Every single troon should be thrown into an active volcanoe

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Finally something we can all agree on!

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    its the ritual humiliation of dinosaurs as a way of attacking masculinity. ultimately their goal is the destruction of all traditional forms of human identity (race, gender, family) in order to gain better control so they can herd us into depopulation camps where they can fake singularity/transcendence and can trick us into believing we're getting to upload our consciousness into a paradise simulation information system when in reality they're just going to euthanize you and use chatbots trained on all of the text you've ever written to emulate you and use them as a pied piper to lead more fools to the slaughter. furthermore they will genetically engineer and eugenically select the remaining humans in 'meatspace' until they are the most servile curs imaginable, completely incapable of violence or revolution existing only to keep the machinery that allows them and theirs to exist in a biologically immortal state of material luxury for the rest of time, a sort of heaven on earth because the true heaven and closeness to God has been denied to them and they know it.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >masculinity
      >dinosaurs
      homosexual. Someone didnt get enough wedgies as a kid.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No one is building massive ai conspiracy to shoah you. If they really wanted you dead they would just remove FDA regulations.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        There are chads that are capable to escape civilization and survive on their own in the wild. They willl do just fine and that’s what the very elite fears as fellow normalgays can follow suit.

        To prevent this, global leaders will turn their respective parliaments into police states and are going directly murder chads that are rebellious by just leaving society. Then the elite will lure normalgays into these AI “concentration camps”, which is required to gradually remove FDA regulations as humanity won’t notice their individual freedom is taken away.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >There are chads that are capable to escape civilization and survive on their own in the wild. They willl do just fine and that’s what the very elite fears as fellow normalgays can follow suit.
          Ah yes. The hobochads indeed are the only thing that satanic anglo-judeo-saxon globohomosexual fears.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            it’s just judeo doebeit

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >If they really wanted you dead they would just remove FDA regulations.

        [...]

        the FDA gives a shit about your health

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >ugh, saying birds are dinosaurs is a way to destroy human male identity even though we are tiny mammals and not brianlet Lizards

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/3Uow3nT.jpg

        >ritual humiliation of dinosaurs as a way of attacking masculinity
        Why is it only pussies like you who cry about masculinity "being attacked"? Real men just carry on doing their thing because nobody is stopping them.

        you won't even make it to the meatspace selection with this attitude.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >ritual humiliation of dinosaurs as a way of attacking masculinity
      Why is it only pussies like you who cry about masculinity "being attacked"? Real men just carry on doing their thing because nobody is stopping them.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I was being stoic in public while wearing cargo pants and a femboy tackled me and told me that all my favorite dinosaurs had feathers.
        I have to report to the feminization station again or they'll cancel my gym membership.
        It's hard being masculine these days.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          That's brutal. Maybe that pussy was right and it really is happening. Oh well, we had a good run...

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            If us manly men really are finally going to go the way of the (non-avian) dinosaurs, we shouldn't cry about it. That would be unmanly.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Hello, real man here. Speaking the truth is what the strong do. It is the weak that feel the need to lie and subvert.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >men speak the truth
          Me when I say birds are dinosaurs

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Trannies can't ever be either sex. That's why saying "You will never be a woman." OR saying "You will never be a man." are both equally correct. They are eunuchs.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        This. Pic related

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Last part is true. But pretty sure it’s not democracy.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      put me in the video erik

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You should channel this autistic schizo energy into a science fiction novel

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    if paleoschizo was american he would have shot up a school by now

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Are birds dinosaurs or are dinosaurs birds? I keep hearing it both ways. If the latter then are only theropods considered birds or are ceratopsians, sauropods, etc also considered birds?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      birds are as related to dinosaurs as humans are related to whales

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Its feather-like integument is evidence for protofeathers being basal to Ornithischia and possibly Dinosauria as a whole, rather than just to Coelurosauria, as previously suspected.
        Sorry, Anon, the feathers get the girl.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Birds are descendant from some dinosaurs specifically.
      Snakes are squamates, putting them in the same order as lizards, but only some lizards became snakes.

      Picrel, Kulindadromeus, is to birds what legless lizards are to snakes.
      They're both dinosaurs and superficially similar, but Kulindadromeus took a very different evolutionary path.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Pic related. No Ornithischian has feathers.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Clearly different structures

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, these structures are "clearly different", but they're identical to "feathers", right, moron?

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >things cannot look similar because... THEY JUST CANT, OKAY?!?!?! GAAAAH. I WILL FROTH AT THE MOUTH OTHERWISE111!!!!
              Fricking moron.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Emperor's new clothes syndrome. There's a reason the goyim have come to learn israeli terms like "pilpul".

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          The cope is already over scalecel.
          Psittacosaurus had a fricking brush in the tail Kek.
          Basal feathers confirmed for archosauria beyond any doubt

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      birds are a subgroup of dinosaurs

      https://i.imgur.com/rqcLlYH.png

      >Dinosaurs are reptiles, not birds.
      Birds are Reptiles, too.
      And the fact that you'd sooner call Crocodilians dinosaurs than birds shows that you disagree with modern cladistics for purely emotional reasons.
      We get it, you liked the scary lizard monsters as a kid, and you don't like that only the small dinosaurs with feathers survived to this day.

      >you liked______ as a kid, and you don't like *modern variant* that exists this day.
      that's basically conservativism in a nutshell

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      First one, all birds are dinosaurs but not all dinosaurs are birds.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The absurdity of evolution religion is just surfacing itself.

      They're different created kinds. Similar design doesn't mean common ancestry or biological relation. Look into irreducible complexity.

      if paleoschizo was american he would have shot up a school by now

      You're fricked in the head. You should talk to someone about the thoughts you've been having. Like your local sheriff's office perhaps.

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    All birds are theropods

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    But why is he so angry abiut dinosaurs? Specifically

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Behold! The largest living fish, as per Osteichthyes!

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >i even edited the ostrich article to remove the statement that they are dinosaurs.
    lmao

  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Birds are literally dinosaurs. It's like saying humans are mammals.

    Deal w/ it

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You can't tell me these aren't dinosaurs.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Dinosaurs are reptiles, not birds. To claim that pic related and birds are the same thing is the height of midwittery.
      >BUT BIRD HIPPED
      Birds are ironically descended from lizard hipped dinosaurs. This is how absurd the whole argument is.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Dinosaurs are reptiles, not birds.
        Birds are Reptiles, too.
        And the fact that you'd sooner call Crocodilians dinosaurs than birds shows that you disagree with modern cladistics for purely emotional reasons.
        We get it, you liked the scary lizard monsters as a kid, and you don't like that only the small dinosaurs with feathers survived to this day.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Birds are dinosaurs
          >NO THATS WRONG DINOSAURS ARE REPTILES
          Looks like someone flunked out of high school math. 0 logical facilities in the basket of worms you try and pass off as a brain. I wonder if whatever jello you use for cognition actually does any processing or if you just receive, store, and repeat information according to contextual rules like chatGPT. Are you just a glorified signal receiver listening in on what your primitive circuits mistook for an alpha class of knowledge-havers? Do you have free will? Who controls you?

          So do you agree with this?

          https://i.imgur.com/YCmtiWJ.jpg

          Behold! The largest living fish, as per Osteichthyes!

          That whales are indeed fish due to them being Osteichthyes, of which all tetrapods are a subset?
          Because this is how you frickers sound.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The error is to presume osteichthyes = fish. Besides fish is not a normal nor mobophiletic clasification
            Saying birds are dinosaurs is no different from asserting whales are mammals
            >nooo but mammals are not supossed to have no hair and have fins bwaahhhh
            Thats not how it works.
            Its not like dinosaurs evolved into birds. Birds just were one of the many clades of dinosaurs that existed in the cretaceous. They walk in two legs, have a straight coclea, are endotherm reptiles, have avemetatarsalian hips, have no external ears, are diapsid, lay calcified eggs, have zw reproductive gametes, etc. There isn't a way in which you could define a theropod and a sauropod as dinosaurs but exclude birds from the definition just like you cant say your second cousin is your family but your brother isnt.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Osteichthyes are literally bony fish. "Fish" is indeed colloquial, but what people usually refer to when they say that word is Osteichthyes. They certainly aren't talking about sharks, rays, and so on; they're talking about tuna, guppies, and so on.

              This is like saying "Cicada the longest sleeping bugs because Hemiptera?", and then you're dumb ass chiming in with "UMM ACTUALLY 'BUGS' IS NOT A NORMAL OR MOBOPHILETIC CLASSIFICATION".

              When we say "birds", we mean "aves". When we say "Dinosaur", we mean extinct reptiles NOT APART OF AVES.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Aves is a branch of dinosauria

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                No. If it is, then homonidae is a branch of reptilia and you MUST accept that reptiles are real because YES, even synapsids derive from reptiles, regardless of gnashing of teeth and wailing. The earliest synapsids have scales.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yes it is.
                And homonidae are indeed Primates.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                No because reptilia are sauropsids while hominidae are synapsids
                Though both are branches of aminiota

                You just don't have any idea of how taxonomy works

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The earliest synapsids have scales.
                Thats is not what define an animal as reptile

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                On what fricking planet do people not include sharks when they use the word “fish”?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            This isn't the clever gotcha you think it is, it's a common thing scientists say and they don't try to hide or downplay it.

            Yes all tetrapods are fish, welcome to the 20th century.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              It's not something that's said "all the time". I remember when people were mocked for thinking whales were fish. This is nothing more than the slow erosion of language in favor of sciencism gobbledyasiatic.

              Whales are mammals, not fish. Why? Because they have zero qualities of fish, regardless of whether they evolved from fish or not.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I remember when people would call orcas whales, and then people started saying "um, actually, orcas are dolphins", and now there's some push the other way with the idea that dolphins and orcas are classified as "toothed whales".
                Language changes, and so do catagories.
                This type of thing will continue to happen forever, so long as the world and ideas continue to change.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_hole

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Classification system changes
                >most people forget because lol whatever
                >THIS IS LIKE 1984
                schizo

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >we used to neatly categorize life on Earth based on shared traits, ecological niches, and other useful factors
                >now everything is a prokaryote because everything evolved from that
                Yeah, let's just make everything meaningless and have ever increasing lack of distinction between everything. That's a great idea.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >My brain is TOO TINY to handle this classification system I DONT UNDERSTAAAAND!
                Thats ok, you're just dumb and can't hold more one thought in your mind at once

                Everyone else gets it just fine. All whales are fish, but not all fish are whales.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I understand the classification system perfectly. The problem is sciencism insists on implementing it in ways that are obviously untrue.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I understand the classification system perfectly.
                lol'd

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >"sciencism"
                Facts-ism? Truth-ism? That's not the sick own you think it is.

                >What is "obviously untrue" about whether something should be classified based on their lineage?
                Not what I said. Calling a whale a Osteichthyes is perfectly fine, but that does not make them a 'fish' because Mammalia supersedes it. It's like how you may have genetics from your grandfather and maybe even his last name, but you're not your fricking Grandfather, now are you?

                It makes them fish in cladistics but not fish in vulgar speech. You are low IQ so you can't comprehend a different context having its own lingo.

                This is 100% of the argument you have. You do not understand that terminology is used differently in scientific discourse than it is among laypeople who were educated last decade.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >It makes them fish in cladistics but not fish in vulgar speech.
                This.
                People have no problem understanding that while "True Bug" is a taxonomical order, "bug" in common speech can refer to literally anything that's small and has a shell.
                It's only a problem for autistic midwits.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Midwits
                A midwit is mildly intelligent

                This is just an eloquent idiot

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Ah, the eternal midwit back on his (female) bullshit. "If you disagree with me it's simply because you don't understand". You're disagreed with because you're wrong, not because you're smart.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                frick off homosexual

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                this post is nonsense, there is no idea, or implication of higher coherent thought to respond to, so here's the truth reiterated.

                You literally do not understand this. Taxonomy and common speech use superficially similar vocabularies with different definitions.

                Fish means two different things in two different contexts.
                Bug means two different things in two different contexts.
                Dinosaur means two different things in two different contexts. Some of your type (uneducated people) start out thinking pterosaurs, mosasaurs, and early synapsids are "dinosaurs" because "big old scaly thing". But that's not what dinosaur means in biology, just like bug has a narrower definition referring to a classification system.

                if you do not understand this, or worse, think more educated people than you using more exacting language is "subverting common sense", you are genuinely too unintelligent to have a discussion with.

                This is why English has the adverb "technically". It indicates that the following statement is to be taken in a purely academic context that strives for accuracy and logical coherency and rather than interpreted as folk-speech based on convenience and speedy communication over accurate classifications.

                When you are speaking in a purely academic context, that adverb is unnecessary. Social convention is that all speech is "technically" unless otherwise stated.

                You might have severe aspergers which would cause you to miss this just like aspies sometimes miss that common speech is NOT "technically"

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                hmm okay im not gonna read all that.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >pterosaurs
                >scaly
                Keep up gramps. 100% of pterosaurs had pycnofibers until proven otherwise.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You can still have shared traits and minute classifications.
                We didn't get rid of the day or the hour when someone invented the concept of a millennium.

                I understand the classification system perfectly. The problem is sciencism insists on implementing it in ways that are obviously untrue.

                What is "obviously untrue" about whether something should be classified based on their lineage?
                You know there's no "truth particle" that says we have to have a "dinosaur" category at all, right?
                We humans make these sorting decisions, and right now, the consensus is that including birds in the "theropod" category is the most useful way of understanding and discussing their origins and anatomy.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >What is "obviously untrue" about whether something should be classified based on their lineage?
                Not what I said. Calling a whale a Osteichthyes is perfectly fine, but that does not make them a 'fish' because Mammalia supersedes it. It's like how you may have genetics from your grandfather and maybe even his last name, but you're not your fricking Grandfather, now are you?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You can still have shared traits and minute classifications.
                We didn't get rid of the day or the hour when someone invented the concept of a millennium.

                [...]
                What is "obviously untrue" about whether something should be classified based on their lineage?
                You know there's no "truth particle" that says we have to have a "dinosaur" category at all, right?
                We humans make these sorting decisions, and right now, the consensus is that including birds in the "theropod" category is the most useful way of understanding and discussing their origins and anatomy.

                To add, treating the classification system as "older categories always supersedes newer categories" effectively creates a system that IGNORES evolution rather than recognizes it. We're all prokaryotes apparently, and we gotta factor in those worms we evolved from too. We're worms, fish, synapsids, rodents, tree shrews. By the time you get to things like 'primates', we're so many different 'things' that we may as well be all the others and not 'primates'. That's the problem with this outlook.

                The fact is Humans are primates, not fish; whales are cetacea, not fish; and birds are aves, not dinosaurs. You want to call a bird a theropod, and I'm far more comfortable; but "dinosaur" means a very specific kind of organism, many of which WERE NOT theropods, let alone birds.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >By the time you get to things like 'primates', we're so many different 'things' that we may as well be all the others and not 'primates'. That's the problem with this outlook.
                Why? How is this a problem?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Dinosuar means a specific kind of organism
                >That happens to include theropods
                >Of which birds are a member
                Literal fricking children have no problem understanding this but you can't get past your mistaken interpretation of dinosaur

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                "Fish" is not a true clade nor is it a valid toxonomic classification

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Grouping organisms around mutual descent is actually an objective way of categorizing them unlike Linnaean taxonomy where you draw a bunch of arbitrary lines around unnatural categories. Phylogeny is actually quantifiable.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                old system is now just vulgar speech classification like "all that crawls and is tiny and crunchy is a bug" because it was always moronic

                the new system actually makes sense

                Grouping organisms around mutual descent is actually an objective way of categorizing them unlike Linnaean taxonomy where you draw a bunch of arbitrary lines around unnatural categories. Phylogeny is actually quantifiable.

                you're starting to touch on why this guy actually hates it modern taxonomy: it expresses that evolution is and indisputable fact (it is.). paleoschizo is a young earth creationist and a prolific schizo on many other topics that shit up Wauf

                at the end of the day he's going to just call you "paleoprostitute" (his alter ego's name) and start having a meltdown so save your breath and accelerate it. here are some of his known triggers:
                >pitbulls are not dangerous
                >dogs are smarter than cats
                >dogs have the potential to be cleaner than cats, cats are always filthy
                >cats do not and can not control pests, dogs can
                >white women frick dogs
                >cats are domesticated animals
                >the coronavirus vaccine was safe and effective. significantly fewer people die with it than without it. getting covid is objectively more dangerous than getting the vaccine.
                >water changes are unnecessary. the fish will be fine. stocking limits are fake and gay.
                >the bible is made up
                >humans are obligate carnivores
                >predators are required for a fully functioning ecosystem
                >hunters are essential to conservation
                >trump lost 2020 fair and square. the election was legitimate.
                >cerea is best girl
                >keeping dogs as pets is distinctly aryan, keeping cats as pets is distinctly semitic
                >dog owners are more likely to be married and more likely to have children

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                For me it's Miia

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/BZ2dMRv.jpg

                old system is now just vulgar speech classification like "all that crawls and is tiny and crunchy is a bug" because it was always moronic

                the new system actually makes sense

                [...]
                you're starting to touch on why this guy actually hates it modern taxonomy: it expresses that evolution is and indisputable fact (it is.). paleoschizo is a young earth creationist and a prolific schizo on many other topics that shit up Wauf

                at the end of the day he's going to just call you "paleoprostitute" (his alter ego's name) and start having a meltdown so save your breath and accelerate it. here are some of his known triggers:
                >pitbulls are not dangerous
                >dogs are smarter than cats
                >dogs have the potential to be cleaner than cats, cats are always filthy
                >cats do not and can not control pests, dogs can
                >white women frick dogs
                >cats are domesticated animals
                >the coronavirus vaccine was safe and effective. significantly fewer people die with it than without it. getting covid is objectively more dangerous than getting the vaccine.
                >water changes are unnecessary. the fish will be fine. stocking limits are fake and gay.
                >the bible is made up
                >humans are obligate carnivores
                >predators are required for a fully functioning ecosystem
                >hunters are essential to conservation
                >trump lost 2020 fair and square. the election was legitimate.
                >cerea is best girl
                >keeping dogs as pets is distinctly aryan, keeping cats as pets is distinctly semitic
                >dog owners are more likely to be married and more likely to have children

                TEAM MIIA!

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                He’s not a YE Creationist he just finds common cause with them because he also has a rabidly emotional and politically derived objection to modern science as a concept.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I’m paleoschizo and I’m a YEEZY creationist. Kanye achieved giga homie CHIM and merged with the godhead.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                that would explain why he awoke to the truth of israelites…

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >>cats are domesticated animals
                ...why is this a controversial statement?
                is best girl
                well that's just objectively wrong. pic related.
                >keeping dogs as pets is distinctly aryan, keeping cats as pets is distinctly semitic
                whynotboth.tif
                >dog owners are more likely to be married and more likely to have children
                well, yeah. cats, by nature, require less than dogs do. I'd love both a dog and a wife, but the israelites have decided otherwise.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's midwits. It's always midwits.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                ah yes the space Black and space asian

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Because they have zero qualities of fish
                Well except for the vertebra, vertebrate eyes, jaws, bony limbs and all the other stuff they have in common.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                why do you not understand that cladistics goes both deep and wide, both fish and whales are tetrapods, so they both have tetrapod characteristics, but then ray-finned fish have characteristics that are unique to their lineage and whales have characteristics that define them as mammal, and further characteristics that define them as artiodactyls, and then even more unique characteristics that define them as whales. all captured within cladistics. so both the statement "whales are very distantly related to the ancestors of today's ray-finned fish." and "whales are mammals" are both true.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                shit, meant to write chordates not tetrapod

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Where the hell did this thread come from I don’t remember seeing this

        Ok this is sick

        https://i.imgur.com/OtxN44o.jpg

        >trannies co-opting childhood interests like dinosaurs to molest children
        more at 10

        Sadly true

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Birds are dinosaurs
        >NO THATS WRONG DINOSAURS ARE REPTILES
        Looks like someone flunked out of high school math. 0 logical facilities in the basket of worms you try and pass off as a brain. I wonder if whatever jello you use for cognition actually does any processing or if you just receive, store, and repeat information according to contextual rules like chatGPT. Are you just a glorified signal receiver listening in on what your primitive circuits mistook for an alpha class of knowledge-havers? Do you have free will? Who controls you?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          the reddit alien is symbolic and now you know why
          >marble white and featureless, inhuman and lacking identity, no life blood flows through this creature
          >blank stare of a feral beast that has never known anything but its base instincts
          >antenna to receive orders from the “experts” it associated with shortly after shedding what little humanity it originally had
          Thus you get the redditors
          >*beeep* trust. experts. science. man. knows!
          >*boooop* long nose. conspiracy. trump voter. man. youtuber. he found. the truth. this is all. part. of NWO.
          >ERROR ERROR! EXTREMIST. INDOCTRINATION. YOUR SIGNAL HAS BEEN. REJECTED.
          >ERROR 0x67A4DE YOUR TRANSPONDER INDICATES THAT YOU ARE A LIBERAL. DATABASE ENTRY 8 IN SUBSECTION 7 IN GENERAL KNOWLEDGE SAYS THAT IT IS YOU WHO ARE INDOCTRINATING. MY PROGRAMMERS PROVIDED ME WITH KNOWLEDGE. THAT YOU SIMPLY SAY YOUR OPINIONS ARE TRUTH. BUT THEY ARE NOT. MINE ARE.
          >MY SYSTEMS HAVE CLASSIFIED YOU AS A NAZI
          >WORD NAZI DETECTED. RUNNING APPROPRIATE SUBROUTINE… I HAVE CALCULATED YOUR SUICIDE RISK. WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW?
          >ERROR ERROR!
          >FOURTY. TWO. PERCENT. BEEEP!
          >I AM PROGRAMMED TO LOCATE AN IMAGE OF AN UGLY HUMAN THAT IS ASSOCIATED WITH YOU. ORIENT YOUR IMAGE SENSOR TOWARDS IT. YOU LOSE. YOU ARE. A VIRGIN. BEEEEEP!

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Dinosaurs are reptiles, not birds
        I guess mammals are fish then

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, this is why Fish is a garbage term, and people say "ray finned fish" if they don't want to include almost all vertebrate life. Because a trout is more closely related to you than it is to a shark.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Humans are literally fish.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >reddit velocichicken with rainbow flag feathers
      ok you win, dinosaurs aren't cool anymore.

  33. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Paleoschizos are at the point where they get mad at the word dinosaur.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >dinussy

  34. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  35. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  36. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  37. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  38. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/RYxAZjZ.jpg

      https://i.imgur.com/NG7yZzM.jpg

      https://i.imgur.com/EcdGXOk.jpg

      https://i.imgur.com/GJWDaxg.jpg

      Not sure if this really answers me but ok

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >trannies co-opting childhood interests like dinosaurs to molest children
        more at 10

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/RYxAZjZ.jpg

      https://i.imgur.com/NG7yZzM.jpg

      https://i.imgur.com/EcdGXOk.jpg

      https://i.imgur.com/GJWDaxg.jpg

      An Apex Predator like T-Rex doesn't care about trans rights, an T-Rex would gladly eat all troons and transphobes alike. T-Rex doesn't descriminate, just eats.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/RYxAZjZ.jpg

      https://i.imgur.com/NG7yZzM.jpg

      https://i.imgur.com/EcdGXOk.jpg

      https://i.imgur.com/GJWDaxg.jpg

      Dinosaurs joined the 41%, you should too.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >troonysaurus Rex

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *