Seahorses aren't fish. You CANNOT change my mind on this one.
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Seahorses aren't fish. You CANNOT change my mind on this one.
Seahorses aren't fish. You CANNOT change my mind on this one.
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
|
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
They are a type of ray-finned fish. If you want to see an evolutionary intermediary between the common fish body plan and the seahorse, look at pipefish.
Neat little frickers ain't they
>cum all over the ocean in hopes of breeding a female
They are far from neat.
Google says it's a fish so it's a fish.
so what is it then?
It's actually a bit confusing to me, but in the way horses and gophers are both mammals, it seems to me like they are fish, but you can make up your own mind.
No, you're right. Fish are edible things that are caught in the sea. Whales are fish because you can eat them and you catch them in the sea. Seals are not fish because, while edible, you mostly catch them on land.
Seahorses are not fish because you can't eat them.
Can you eat scorpionfish? Starfish? Spotted trunkfish? Silverfish?
>you can't eat them
Says who?
There is no such thing as a fish. The word fish has no meaning.
We call things that swim in the sea fish but biologically and evolutionarily speaking they have absolutely nothing to do with each other. If you're going to call something a fish you may as well call butterflies and bats 'birds' because they fly in the sky.
I hate homosexuals like you.
"Fish" is a niche, the term didnt come about with scientific rigor because science as we know it didnt exist.
Its a nin scientific term science coopted.
Its like ssying trees dont exist.
>Its like ssying trees dont exist
>it's like saying something correct
Woody plants exist as an abstract group, but in terms of phylogeny an oak and a yew are as distant as it gets.
Osteotraci and gnasthostomata?
>hurr stop thinking, just trust the science
Frick off you pedantic shit. All modern fishes share a common ancestor, common traits, and a common body plan. You may as well say "vertebrate" and "invertebrate" don't exist because of some phylogenetic tree bullshit. After all, cnidaria, mollusca, and arthropoda aren't "really" related, right? :^)
Duh, they're horses
They're not sea horses they were dumb fishes all along bro...