>rhinos are more closely related to bats than to elephants

>rhinos are more closely related to bats than to elephants

share more worldview-shattering phylogeny facts

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sure enough, both Bats and Rhinoceros have scrotums, and Elephants don't.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This commercial came out 20 years ago. Maybe even earlier. It used to be all over ebaums world and forums. It simply will not die, and I am happy to see it.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Mantisflies and mantises aren't actually very closely related.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is that real?

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Snakes are actually just lizards

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But legless lizards are not snakes.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Low IQ take:
    >Whales are fish
    Average IQ take:
    >Whales are mammals
    High IQ take:
    >Whales are fish

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Transcendent IQ take:
      >Is there a common ancestor of whales and sharks, and if so, how did one become a mammal and the other a fish?

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Over 70% of horses will look like this by 2030 thanks to pollution

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >EVERYTHING WILL BE UNDERWATER BY 2030, BUY MY SUBMARINE GOY

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Coconut crab is not a crab
    King cobra is not a cobra
    Red and giant panda are not (closely) related.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is a sea snake

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i can sea that.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    humans are hybrids of chimps and pigs

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >this is what ev*lutionists ACTUALLY believe

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        God used a chimp and a pig to make Adam.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Evidence? Sounds like a big steaming load of fresh bullshit

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Do you mean evidence that it's accepted by the scientific community or do you need every single detail?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Either? Something showing its true

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Look at the pic then. To elaborate, elephants are in this clade:
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tethytheria
          Rhinos and bats are in this clade:
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrotifera

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Scrotifera
            >The name comes from the word scrotum, a pouch in which the testes permanently reside in the adult male. All members of the group have a postpenile scrotum, often prominently displayed, except for some aquatic forms and pangolin (which has the testes just below the skin). It appears to be an ancestral character for this group, yet other orders generally lack this as an ancestral feature, with the probable exception of Primates.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    elephant closet relative are these little fellas

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What's it about mammals that makes them evolve so fast?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'd always been told that it was simply their warm-bloodedness causing great adaptivity. That makes sense I guess, but it doesn't really explain the speed of mammal evolution?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They don't actually evolve that fast compared to other animal groups. Squamates and birds are both way more species rich than mammals. Let's not bring bony fish and especially not arthropods into the conversation.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The number of species is a gay metric. There are 20 thousand ant species, they all look the same. "Hurr durr we're different because we can't reproduce with the other species" frick off, stupid ant.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Mammals have very similar structures of bones and innards. They don't even need to come up with new genes, they just shift a few sliders and change their shape.
        Personally I think periods of harsh environmental conditions which reduce population numbers are the main drivers behind change. Inbreeding of species with lower chromosome numbers unleashes some fricked up shapes and mutations.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        they didn't. mammals were stuck in nocturnal vermin MMR hell from the triassic to the cretaceous after the therapsids, our ancestors, got heavily BTFO'd in the P-T extinction. There was an explosion in evolution to fill niches left by the dinosaurs dying out.
        I'm mostly vegetarian but I have no issues with eating birds, every nugget i eat is an act of ancestral vengeance against the archosaurs.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Very true. We were under the cruel rule of the reptile/avian for millions of years. Humiliated. Reduced to nothing. We need to assert our dominance while we’re still at the top.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >while we're still on top
            Heh
            The next top will still be us. Mammals will go extinct, but not by surprise. Unlike most animals, we've chosen our successor, and it is still us, because we need not be mammals to be ourselves.

            Some people won't be too happy but this was 100% intentional.

            No, it's not AI, it's vampires hahahaha AI is just an autocomplete algorithm it isn't any more capable of creativity than the human brain I mean a dumb one

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            they didn't. mammals were stuck in nocturnal vermin MMR hell from the triassic to the cretaceous after the therapsids, our ancestors, got heavily BTFO'd in the P-T extinction. There was an explosion in evolution to fill niches left by the dinosaurs dying out.
            I'm mostly vegetarian but I have no issues with eating birds, every nugget i eat is an act of ancestral vengeance against the archosaurs.

            hail colonel sanders

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You’re just seeing the tips of a heavily pruned tree.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Birds suck at being prunes

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You're more closely related to a bird than a lizard is to a salamander.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/z4yLHrn.jpg

      elephant closet relative are these little fellas

      None of those are related to each other.

      What's it about mammals that makes them evolve so fast?

      Evolution doesn't real.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >bill nye the science guy
        they arent sending their best. this is how much of a joke you are to them

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >bill nye the science guy
          >André Rieu the classical music guy.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's more like saying Katy Perry "the Classical Music Guy" seeing as Bill Nye is (barely) an engineer by education (i.e. a street shitter in most cases)

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Viper the classical music guy

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Odd throwback.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Birds are actually DINOSAURS

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT!!!!????

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >birds are reptiles
    >termites are wienerroaches
    >insects are shrimp

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >birds are reptiles
      Yes.
      >termites are wienerroaches
      Termites are Blattoidea.
      >insects are shrimp
      Anything can be a shrimp.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        can I be a shrimp?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You can be a shrimp for me, anon.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            thank you

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Can you fry rice?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            real talk? No.
            Always mess it up either too greasy or I frick up the extra ingredients.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Blattoidea
        Aka wienerroaches

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Phylogeny is nothing but lies straight from the serpent's mouth.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Phylogeny fact: serpents evolved speech even though they're more closely related to iguanas than to humans

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sneed

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    whales have more right to be considered fish than sharks

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What??? Explain

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Whales are bony fishes and sharks are cartilaginous fishes, but I'm not sure you could say one is more fishy than the other.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          mammary glands and hair.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            ?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sharks split off earlier, though I don't know enough about phylogeny to know whether that anon is actually correct. By the same logic, we have more right to be called fish than sharks.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    All placental mammals are closer related to eachother than crocodiles are to alligators

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      As in how far back did they split, right?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This raises an interesting question. Does it matter how long animals live? Imagine if an animal split off 1 billion years ago, but lives to be 1 billion years old.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You're a moron.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Holy shit, I thought elephants were ungulates or at least laurasiatherians.
    I also thought sirenians were pinnipeds, I'm always forgetting about afrotherians.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It is my learned opinion (cold, hard fact for (You)), that hyenas are merely dog-shaped cats.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      what is it about group hunting that makes faces longer?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They can point better in lowlight?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Arent they more like dog shaped weasels?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *