People b***h about this because they know they will never reach the level of aristocracy to afford killing an apex predator like this. Its a reserved sport for the elite. People who can afford artisan big game rifles and cigars and whiskey. I don't think I have the balls to kill an animal but I don't see the immoral implications of game/trophy hunting.
>killing an animal with no intention of eating it
homosexual ego-maniacs. >killing an animal and using every part of its body you possibly could
Based, and respectable individuals.
It's that simple.
all animals exist in a food chain according to nature and if humans managed to invent the gun with what nature gave us (a brain) then we have every right to use that in whatever way we see fit. I have never seen a basedboy complain that a chimp can use a stick to beat something to death
the people who (legally) kill lions and elephants pay something like $50k a pop to the park, which is probably like 30% the annual salary of all park rangers combined
It supposedly helps fund conservationism...supposedly.
I hope those big game hunters at least bother getting the pelt or hiring a taxidermist to get a trophy.
Thousands of dollars spent by foreign hunters does, and you better believe the local governments will protect that investment better than a non-profit who passes ~~*laws*~~ that are ignored by poachers and locals.
you can only get a tag to hunt males that have already been kicked out of a pride and are just waiting to die. The countries that allow you to do it use the money to support their national parks.
>use the money to support their national parks.
They should use the money to hire mercs to shoot poachers. It's more efficient and effective than all the crazy countermeasures they attempt to do. And as a huge benefit, as poachers get fricked, all the traditional chinese medicine morons get fricked as well.
>Here's an inconvenient truth about national parks >Nooo it's poachers and Chinese!
You may as well expand that to include about 80% of the park workers too who are corrupt as frick, and the govt officials who use it to fund "tourism", and in turn basically just black ppl in general.
noooo its different we wuz protecting livestock so we could sell dead animals and make money not selling those other dead animals to make money! not killing them all would have been bad for our bottom line! And what about camping for fun huh? Poachers buy watches for fun instead. SCUM!
I'm fine with killing whatever you want just don't let the body go to waste. Make some bone broth make a carpet, something but don't just shoot the fricker and leave him for the buzzards.
I just find hunting kind of gay because they don't even do battle with the animal
I could respect that
Look at the scope on that rifle
Shooting it from a half mile away before it even knows you're there is a homosexual as it gets
>I think something I have no fricking idea about should be regulated according to my complete ignorance on the subject.
>Here's an inconvenient truth about national parks >Nooo it's poachers and Chinese!
You may as well expand that to include about 80% of the park workers too who are corrupt as frick, and the govt officials who use it to fund "tourism", and in turn basically just black ppl in general.
These frickos don't understand how corrupt the third world and how laws are simply ignored. Most are probably smoking a weed vape when it's still illegal on the Federal level here in the States, but thinks LE LAWS will fix all the evils of the world.
Unless you are spending money to protect your investments, someone else is going to swoop in any take it. Legal hunting of big game creates jobs, revenue, and provides for the local economy.
Superiority complex
taking it out on wild animals so they're able to tell their equally moronic family that they killed a lion with a gun from a safe distance at the next reunion
same as the dipshits that climb everest with a tour guide and virtually no risk
absolutely no one who opposes this kind of thing thinks that lions are hecking innocent flufferinos who would cuddle with them if given the chance
you just can't conceptualize that people might care about something even if it's not subservient or useful to them.
This, I agree that hunting big animals like this should be regulated such that the animal has a decent chance of winning.
Humans are just the best, if lions dont want to be get sniped from a mile away maybe they should invent guns too
Superiority complex
taking it out on wild animals so they're able to tell their equally moronic family that they killed a lion with a gun from a safe distance at the next reunion
same as the dipshits that climb everest with a tour guide and virtually no risk
If you get to a point where you are able to make so much large sums of money, to the point where you can afford to book long elaborate trips to a far off country, you need to be stable in some capacity to pull it off. An insecure or unstable person would rarely get to that point or opportunity. You don't get many schizos or people with anxiety become millionaires or successful entrepreneurs.
Also: >YiKeS!1!!1
I see what spectrum you fall in kek
>become millionaires or successful entrepreneur >become millionaires >become
Lol. Your philosophy may have been valid 60 or 70 years ago. Not so much anymore. Most millionaires nowadays are instable, emotionally immature children in the body of an adult living off the opportunities and money their wealthy parents left them. 99.9% of 'entrepreneurs' nowadays had wealthy parents funding their ventures. 99.9% of millionaires had equally wealthy or wealthier parents.
>climb everest with a tour guide and virtually no risk >no risk
wat? u start dying 4/5ths of the way up. if anything goes wrong you’re left to die while the rest of your party and other tourists summit. it’s walking most of the way but ice climbing and crossing a thin wall of 100 year old snow the last 100 meters. one storm and you’re forever known by an article of clothing.
said flufferino is of ZERO threat to the average obese americans that goes hunt them to prove his masculinity or shit. Said supposed masculine alpha just waits around scrolling tiktok inside his airconditioned jeep and when he sees the animal just fricking points the gun and shoots, whoo hoo whoop de doo how skilled how brave, how daring.
>Noooo the heckin flufferino! >*shoots dove* >Just a reminder that >*kills a cow by pulverizing its prefrontal cortex* >it's a vile >*beheads a chicken and laughs as the flock clamors to eat their dead kin* >aggressive >*causes blunt force trauma to dogs neck because it wasn't 100% interested in following his exact footsteps* >remorseless >*buys kosher pork that was slowly and painfully bled to death* >beast >*speeds up and swerves to run over cat* >That you wouldn't really care about >*sends more tax money to israel so they can kill 10 civillians for every 1 "terrorist" aka anyone resisting ashkenazi occupation and colonization* >if it didn't look fluffy to you >*takes a bite of veal*
Well I guess if it doesn't matter neither do most humans because we are also an apex predator. Even at our nicest, we need to kill other animals to stay alive. Lots of them. There is no 0 harm, only "i only killed 2 babies to grow and murder some GMO wheat today, when i could have killed 5 babies after feeding them the stalks from the GMO wheat, i am not a murderer" tier "solutions" and we pollute the world with literal forever poisons as we go about our business. The absolute best we can do morally is live like vultures, with a population of 8000 and no technology whatsoever. Or base your morals on something other than not killing stuff.
This is legit truth. I don't see people obsessing over Komodo Dragons. Wauf subhumans literally seethe at poor Bambinos getting eaten by them.
Its because komodos are borderline automatons and less like us, the deer are more intelligent and more like us. That's how empathy works. It is a human detector that maxes out its meter at pure human. If you think that makes it invalid because "just kemikuls", go be a psychopath and find out that morality is really just survival instincts and when people lynch you as non-psychos are few and the normal are many, they are reminding you how well their survival strategy works.
>Its because komodos are borderline automatons and less like us, the deer are more intelligent and more like us. That's how empathy works. It is a human detector that maxes out its meter at pure human. If you think that makes it invalid because "just kemikuls", go be a psychopath and find out that morality is really just survival instincts and when people lynch you as non-psychos are few and the normal are many, they are reminding you how well their survival strategy works.
Doesnt make the seething any less gay, people hunt deer all the time
>History literally filled with leaders hunting lions engraved in fricking stone
Read a book Anon
Women?
I don't know man, apparently it's mostly a sex thing but some people actually claim to like them for their personalities which is laughable.
People b***h about this because they know they will never reach the level of aristocracy to afford killing an apex predator like this. Its a reserved sport for the elite. People who can afford artisan big game rifles and cigars and whiskey. I don't think I have the balls to kill an animal but I don't see the immoral implications of game/trophy hunting.
>killing an animal with no intention of eating it
homosexual ego-maniacs.
>killing an animal and using every part of its body you possibly could
Based, and respectable individuals.
It's that simple.
The meat is given to nearby villages you idiots
Trophy hunting is producing more Black folk?
#EndTrophyHunting
the meat is eaten.
Humor.
All americans are mentally ill
all animals exist in a food chain according to nature and if humans managed to invent the gun with what nature gave us (a brain) then we have every right to use that in whatever way we see fit. I have never seen a basedboy complain that a chimp can use a stick to beat something to death
sure, then start eating what you killed
Revenge
White people are demons.
the people who (legally) kill lions and elephants pay something like $50k a pop to the park, which is probably like 30% the annual salary of all park rangers combined
>he isn't on herp tiktok
mostly men and a couple women with leopard geckos and boas (normie trap reptiles) and one lady with an orchid mantis
It supposedly helps fund conservationism...supposedly.
I hope those big game hunters at least bother getting the pelt or hiring a taxidermist to get a trophy.
Upvotes and likes don't do dick for conservation.
Thousands of dollars spent by foreign hunters does, and you better believe the local governments will protect that investment better than a non-profit who passes ~~*laws*~~ that are ignored by poachers and locals.
tl;dr Money talks, bullshit walks.
Nothing this is basically male lions retirement plan
It was comin' right at me, dude!
Total
Furboi
Death
Don't you have to pay for the rearing of two lions to kill one?
you can only get a tag to hunt males that have already been kicked out of a pride and are just waiting to die. The countries that allow you to do it use the money to support their national parks.
>use the money to support their national parks.
They should use the money to hire mercs to shoot poachers. It's more efficient and effective than all the crazy countermeasures they attempt to do. And as a huge benefit, as poachers get fricked, all the traditional chinese medicine morons get fricked as well.
>Here's an inconvenient truth about national parks
>Nooo it's poachers and Chinese!
You may as well expand that to include about 80% of the park workers too who are corrupt as frick, and the govt officials who use it to fund "tourism", and in turn basically just black ppl in general.
>we should murder people trying to feed their families because i like looking at rhinos
LEAST sociopathic animal rights turd.
Don’t forget what YOUR people did to bears, wolves, irish elk, european lions… this could be a very long list.
noooo its different we wuz protecting livestock so we could sell dead animals and make money not selling those other dead animals to make money! not killing them all would have been bad for our bottom line! And what about camping for fun huh? Poachers buy watches for fun instead. SCUM!
Lion deez nuts !
Tiny dick syndrome
That's a Real Woman™ anon.
I'm fine with killing whatever you want just don't let the body go to waste. Make some bone broth make a carpet, something but don't just shoot the fricker and leave him for the buzzards.
Buzzards gotta eat, same with worms.
>Buzzards
?
Americans call vultures or any scavenging bird a buzzard.
This. If you kill something instantly from a quarter mile away, at least have the decency to make its death mean something.
I just find hunting kind of gay because they don't even do battle with the animal
I could respect that
Look at the scope on that rifle
Shooting it from a half mile away before it even knows you're there is a homosexual as it gets
This, I agree that hunting big animals like this should be regulated such that the animal has a decent chance of winning.
>I think something I have no fricking idea about should be regulated according to my complete ignorance on the subject.
These frickos don't understand how corrupt the third world and how laws are simply ignored. Most are probably smoking a weed vape when it's still illegal on the Federal level here in the States, but thinks LE LAWS will fix all the evils of the world.
Unless you are spending money to protect your investments, someone else is going to swoop in any take it. Legal hunting of big game creates jobs, revenue, and provides for the local economy.
Humans are just the best, if lions dont want to be get sniped from a mile away maybe they should invent guns too
>away before it even knows you're there
the virgins f22 and other stealths vs the serge migs and sukhs
>NOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST HUNT ANIMALS THAT WOULD EAT YOU WITHOUT A SECOND THOUGHT
Vegans are mentally disabled.
Superiority complex
taking it out on wild animals so they're able to tell their equally moronic family that they killed a lion with a gun from a safe distance at the next reunion
same as the dipshits that climb everest with a tour guide and virtually no risk
spbp
People who trophy hunt are weak and insecure.
Yet they are often wealthy and have secure livelihoods...does not quite work does it?
>big number in bank must mean you are mentally strong and secure
that's gonna be a yikes from me senpai
If you get to a point where you are able to make so much large sums of money, to the point where you can afford to book long elaborate trips to a far off country, you need to be stable in some capacity to pull it off. An insecure or unstable person would rarely get to that point or opportunity. You don't get many schizos or people with anxiety become millionaires or successful entrepreneurs.
Also:
>YiKeS!1!!1
I see what spectrum you fall in kek
>become millionaires or successful entrepreneur
>become millionaires
>become
Lol. Your philosophy may have been valid 60 or 70 years ago. Not so much anymore. Most millionaires nowadays are instable, emotionally immature children in the body of an adult living off the opportunities and money their wealthy parents left them. 99.9% of 'entrepreneurs' nowadays had wealthy parents funding their ventures. 99.9% of millionaires had equally wealthy or wealthier parents.
>climb everest with a tour guide and virtually no risk
>no risk
wat? u start dying 4/5ths of the way up. if anything goes wrong you’re left to die while the rest of your party and other tourists summit. it’s walking most of the way but ice climbing and crossing a thin wall of 100 year old snow the last 100 meters. one storm and you’re forever known by an article of clothing.
N-nooo not my heckin flufferino.
Just a reminder that it's a vile agressive remorseless beast. That you wouldn't really care about if it didn't look fluffy to you.
absolutely no one who opposes this kind of thing thinks that lions are hecking innocent flufferinos who would cuddle with them if given the chance
you just can't conceptualize that people might care about something even if it's not subservient or useful to them.
said flufferino is of ZERO threat to the average obese americans that goes hunt them to prove his masculinity or shit. Said supposed masculine alpha just waits around scrolling tiktok inside his airconditioned jeep and when he sees the animal just fricking points the gun and shoots, whoo hoo whoop de doo how skilled how brave, how daring.
t. seething l*on
This is legit truth. I don't see people obsessing over Komodo Dragons. Wauf subhumans literally seethe at poor Bambinos getting eaten by them.
>Noooo the heckin flufferino!
>*shoots dove*
>Just a reminder that
>*kills a cow by pulverizing its prefrontal cortex*
>it's a vile
>*beheads a chicken and laughs as the flock clamors to eat their dead kin*
>aggressive
>*causes blunt force trauma to dogs neck because it wasn't 100% interested in following his exact footsteps*
>remorseless
>*buys kosher pork that was slowly and painfully bled to death*
>beast
>*speeds up and swerves to run over cat*
>That you wouldn't really care about
>*sends more tax money to israel so they can kill 10 civillians for every 1 "terrorist" aka anyone resisting ashkenazi occupation and colonization*
>if it didn't look fluffy to you
>*takes a bite of veal*
Well I guess if it doesn't matter neither do most humans because we are also an apex predator. Even at our nicest, we need to kill other animals to stay alive. Lots of them. There is no 0 harm, only "i only killed 2 babies to grow and murder some GMO wheat today, when i could have killed 5 babies after feeding them the stalks from the GMO wheat, i am not a murderer" tier "solutions" and we pollute the world with literal forever poisons as we go about our business. The absolute best we can do morally is live like vultures, with a population of 8000 and no technology whatsoever. Or base your morals on something other than not killing stuff.
Its because komodos are borderline automatons and less like us, the deer are more intelligent and more like us. That's how empathy works. It is a human detector that maxes out its meter at pure human. If you think that makes it invalid because "just kemikuls", go be a psychopath and find out that morality is really just survival instincts and when people lynch you as non-psychos are few and the normal are many, they are reminding you how well their survival strategy works.
So you're saying only vegans amd vegetarians have the moral high ground to speak out against poaching and big animal hunting of endangered species?
>Its because komodos are borderline automatons and less like us, the deer are more intelligent and more like us. That's how empathy works. It is a human detector that maxes out its meter at pure human. If you think that makes it invalid because "just kemikuls", go be a psychopath and find out that morality is really just survival instincts and when people lynch you as non-psychos are few and the normal are many, they are reminding you how well their survival strategy works.
Doesnt make the seething any less gay, people hunt deer all the time
No, no, I react in a similar manner when things like gators, sharks, pythons, etc. are killed like this too.