Now it is a real animal

Now it is a real animal

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    dog cetacean is best

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's more likely because we know, for fact, that every animal with confirmed flippers has proportionally much longer finger bones than those in the OP.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >And then I told Tiktaalik, well, what if I DID go back? You should have seen his face LMAO

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Evolutionist cope

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >hey guys, everyone look at me! I'm so retarded! Please, oh please give me attention, for I will surely starve to death otherwise!
      (You)

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Where'd the hind legs go?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they're still there, just becoming vestigial

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >last version inexplicably has hind limbs that are 50% smaller than those in the fossil skeleton
    Que?

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    how scientists would think tigers looked

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Either the second or third one could easily be the more correct one

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is the "real animal" just a cope by fatasses?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      All marine mammals have some substantial heft to them, anon.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What about otters?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They're pretty sturdy for something the size of a large housecat.
          If you're in water you need a lot of subcutaneous fat for buoyancy and insulation.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      real animals have CURVES!

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >your terrestrial period has ended

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    To be fair, whilst I'm pretty sure the Meaty one might be a bit too bulky, John's one really just looks dessicated. There's a reason one doesn't shrinkwrap mammals.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Conservative take is always more accurate

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It always fucking is. Remember that "radical" takes back in the day were shit like:
      >Stegosaurus could fly
      >Parasaurolophus could breathe fire
      >Tricerotops and Torosaurus are the same species
      >Tyrannosaurus was a scavenger because it had poor eyesight
      >Sauropods were aquatic
      And so on.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Tricerotops and Torosaurus are the same species
        >Tyrannosaurus was a scavenger because it had poor eyesight

        Jack Horner would like to know your address

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah? Well when he comes by, I can fucking explain to him have wolves have shit eyesight and are still active predators.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Sauropods were aquatic
        how else could their body weight support them
        it's still true
        were you there? didn't think so

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          jeses christ you're retarded

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Muh square cube law
          Is not real. There is nothing a number cruncher can do to deny the existence of real animals

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This.
        Can't wait for featherfags to weep bloody tears when their grandchildren force them concede that dinosaurs didn't have any feathers.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes
      Modern one has the legs too short for the skeleton

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Conservative take is always more accurate
      Counterpoint: Peacocks.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    yaaay

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *