*makes it impossible to step outside your house anytime the weather is nice*

*makes it impossible to step outside your house anytime the weather is nice*

Why haven't we found a way to genocide this entire class of insects yet? They're a bane to the existence of all other life on earth and they serve absolutely no ecological purpose.

CRIME Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

CRIME Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >have hashimoto's
    >any mosquito that bites me is doomed to death
    >every time it bites me, I scratch, yet I also smile

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    hot weather is wretched, nice weather is coming up for a couple months soon

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Nice weather won't stop them

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >they serve absolutely no ecological purpose.
    those based lil' buggers shoah Black folk by the fricking boatload
    now, ticks on the other hand

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I could live if the frickers just sucked a little blood. but they also transmit disaes and irritants and shit. Frick Them , we need a plan to genocide them.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >but they also transmit disaes
      Nothing to worry about unless you're a congolese Black person

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i feel the same way about humans. They honestly should be genocided. No joke. no edge. No bitter anger. Just facts. to many of them. and they make life for all other animals a pain in the ass.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Be consequent then.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      you're posting this so you can appear like you're morally on a higher level, like you want to make the impression like you're so morally aware that you understand humans cause suffering by simply existing and wish they didn't exist
      What you come across as is mentally ill though because while true, this is true for every living being and humans (like all other animals) instinctually and biologically do not give a frick about what or who they hurt to live their life in the long run because biologically, it's either doing that or dying out, and you can guess why the "I should stop living and not reproduce because it hurts others" gene isnt very dominant when it comes to how people perceive life

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >this is true for every living being
        No other living being is causing mass extinctions at the moment.
        >humans (like all other animals) instinctually and biologically do not give a frick about what or who they hurt
        This is why human reproduction must be managed and controlled by authoritarian rule. You can't allow the wetness of pussy shape the balance of our biosphere.
        >the "I should stop living and not reproduce because it hurts others" gene isnt very dominant when it comes to how people perceive life
        It's an evolutionary trait that leads to a dead end, kinda like how animals evolve to eat only one type of food out of convenience, their population grows and flourishes but then the environment shifts and they get wiped out all at once. Stopping the masses from multiplying too much is the winning strategy in the long run.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >It's an evolutionary trait that leads to a dead end,
          How the frick does not being a sad c**t who self-castrates a "dead end"? This is completely unfollowable logic

          >bluh bluh bluh we must protect all species
          Here's a question you can't answer: Why do we have to do that?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >How the frick does not being a sad c**t who self-castrates a "dead end"?
            This question has already been addressed in my previous post.
            >Here's a question you can't answer: Why do we have to do that?
            I can, but the answer is complex and I don't think you have what it takes to understand it. I'll write it anyway for anyone interested.
            1) Destroying the intricate network of organisms that covers our habitat inevitably leads to its collapse. The natural resources we rely on are inextricably tied to the integrity of our ecosystems, which can't exist without the protection of individual species. To protect the endangered frog Bombina pachypus is not to overfocus on a single species, but to reverse anthropogenic impact on an entire biome. Rare/endemic species help us see the early signs of anthropogenic damage, keystone species are directly tied to our survival. The alternative is to allow land desertification, pollution, extinctions and soil erosion to keep increasing until we are crushed by the avalanche of our actions.
            2) Our understanding of nature and its mechanisms is still in its infancy. Disrupting the balance of nature and removing key components from it hinders our search for knowledge and purpose.
            3) When we fail to transfer our natural heritage to future generations we are actively disrupting our culture and history.
            While temples, cities, churches and monuments crumble and fade away with the passage of time the species that compose our habitats remain the same. They are the most fundamental connection our people have with their land, and it's our responsibility towards our successors to preserve them.
            4) Because the diversity of shapes and adaptations that life can take is inherently beautiful and sacred.
            Pentti Linkola explained it better than I possibly could, so I'll post a quote from his book.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >This question has already been addressed in my previous post.
              No it hasnt, passing on your genes is not a genetic dead end, you are moronic

              >Destroying the intricate network of organisms that covers our habitat inevitably leads to its collapse.
              No source, no evidence, you're simply saying that because it's your opinion. I.e. you're full of shit and trying to pass an idea that you have as fact

              > While temples, cities, churches and monuments crumble and fade away with the passage of time the species that compose our habitats remain the same. They are the most fundamental connection our people have with their land, and it's our responsibility towards our successors to preserve them.
              lol
              you are a moronic Black person for real, this planet existed for millions of years with tons of species that we've never seen or interacted with that all went totally fricking extinct many times over. You're acting like the planet can't survive a mass extinction event when there's been dozens of them before anything resembling a hominid even came to be

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >No it hasnt, passing on your genes is not a genetic dead end, you are moronic
                Leading the entire species to extinction isn't either.
                >No source, no evidence
                See pic.
                >this planet existed for millions of years with tons of species that we've never seen or interacted with that all went totally fricking extinct many times over
                Your answer addresses neither of my points. Then again my post was never aimed at you to begin with.
                In any case all those extinctions either anticipated a massive ecocatastrophe or were caused by it.
                Humanity is quickly sowing the seeds of a new one and there's no sane reason to believe that we will survive it, apex animals never do.
                We are bound to join the millions of species that already left the Earth if we don't drastically reduce our numbers. It takes a very sincere love for humanity to understand that human depopulation is a necessity.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                None of those links are scientific resources. You literally linked shit like some journos ramblings on the guardian. Do you even understand what evidence is Black person? I don't accept anything but actual peer reviewed studies on this. I dont give a frick what your favorite opinion blogger has to say

                >Humanity is quickly sowing the seeds of a new one and there's no sane reason to believe that we will survive it, apex animals never do.
                You neither have any evidence to support the idea that humans would go extinct in such a scenario, nor did you outline any sort of reasonable theory of what might happen. You're literally just saying that humans will make things go extinct (this is a reasonable assumption and I'm not arguing this) and for nebolous reasons you can't explain, it will kill humans.

                Are you a woman? Literally everything you're saying is based on feelings and not on facts

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >None of those links are scientific resources
                All of them are either scientific publications or have verifiable sources. Just say that you don't like/don't feel like reading the articles, no need to come up with excuses.
                >You literally linked shit like some journos ramblings on the guardian
                It's to make it easier for you to understand since you have a bit of bad luck at thinking. Click on the first citation on the page and you'll see the actual study.
                >and for nebolous reasons you can't explain, it will kill humans
                Soil erosion, desertification, plastic pollution, air pollution, depletion of non-renewable resources, overexploitation of biomass, loss of keystone species causing economic or agricultural collapse.
                There is so much more I have to say about this topic but all you've been doing is shitting your diaper and whining for three posts straight, can you please step it up?
                Anyone smarter willing to take this anon's place?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Ignoring the shitty woman snarky shit in your post

                >Soil erosion, desertification, plastic pollution, air pollution, depletion of non-renewable resources, overexploitation of biomass, loss of keystone species causing economic or agricultural collapse.
                Now you have a theory. Link scientific resources that provide evidence any of these things are likely to occur and actually cause human extinction. I'll decline reading through a 2 page guardian article

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Then read the source and the rest of the links.
                I'd recommend reading the Guardian article over the source though, I'm sure it will be simpler for you to understand.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Excellent post, however I see no links to peer reviewed science that acts as evidence for your claims
                I accept your concession

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                There is one link within the news article (https://www.fao.org/3/CA3129EN/CA3129EN.pdf) and three other links in the linkmix page.
                I should have to point this out. Are you just starved for replies?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                This is an assessment report, not a peer reviewed study serving as evidence for any of the claims you made
                It's essentially an opinion piece written with some authority. Guess what, I dont give a frick about opinion pieces. Do you know what peer reviewed science is dog?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Wow, you're a full on israelite.

          animals get out of control and wipe out local species constantly, first of all.

          Secondly, Humans are excellent, who the frick are you to say we need to be regulated. Regulate yourself with a gun. I want more humans because I enjoy their company.

          Frick your shitty false morals you blood drinking goblin piece of trash. The world can handle a shit ton more of us, just not more parasitic governance.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >animals get out of control and wipe out local species constantly, first of all
            Yes, that's one of the many results of anthropogenic ecological damage. Invasive species need population control too.
            >Secondly, Humans are excellent
            Humans' excellence lies in their self- awareness. Reducing humanity into a seething mass of billions of individuals destroys our identity and purpose.
            Large predators are meant to exist in small numbers.
            >The world can handle a shit ton more of us
            We are already facing severe consequences for our overpopulation that will only get more severe in the upcoming years.
            Nobody benefits from overpopulation aside from the israelites you accuse me of siding with. Their industry and enterprises benefit from large hives of impoverished workers to exploit, but the rest of humanity as well as the other species are suffocated under its blanket.
            When populations begin to shrink (as a natural and spontaneous form of self-preservation) the israelite panics and launches mass immigration campaigns. Advocates of human extinction like you should adore them, they bring you so much of the company you said you need. The Black folks they bring next to you come from the kind of horrifically overpopulated societies you wish to live in.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Ignoring what the other people said I want to engage with your point.
              What's your suggestion? Where must population be culled? How must it be done? whats most reasonable in terms of actual execution?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >"I should stop living and not reproduce because it hurts others" gene inst very dominant when it comes to how people perceive life
        That's why you don't allow for self selection. Only certain people should be allowed to reproduce.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Only certain people should be allowed to reproduce.
          Try enforcing this pussy. People who look like the chad in the image you posted will knock at your door at night and shoot you when you open up

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            This. Any and all attempts to control human reproduction have met in pretty much immediate failure for the reason just listed. The second you tell a man he has no reason to continue living, why would he not just turn all his unspent energy on destroying the system keeping him down?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Have you seen a nature documentary ever? Animals are all horrible c**ts to each other. We're just better at it. Just be honest and say you hate humans because you couldn't measure up to your peers, and will die a miserable outcast.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Animals are all horrible c**ts to each other
        Animals all acts as checks and balances to each other. Prey animals benefit from their predators even if they bring death and pain, because they control their populations and migratory patterns.
        Humans are the only puzzle piece that's out of place, because our attacks on other species lead to total extinction and we only benefit a few selected species, like rats and mosquitoes.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >you hate humans because
        There are no such interactions. Psychological traits are heritable. You've got the genes for misanthropy? You'll be a misanthrope.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What? Why?! Without mosquitoes, humans would suffer from a deadly buildup of blood and eventually explode. It is the humble mosquito that provides a great service to mankind by ensuring that blood is drained properly and that iron levels are kept within healthy levels. Off your warm naked skin to a mosquito, not your scorn.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      i would rather have a cute vampire gf

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Back in my day we had to take a whole trip to the doctor to take off our bad blood. Kids these days dont know how good they have it

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I wouldn't give a shit if they:
    - didn't spread disease
    - didn't induce such an itchy bite
    I'd be fine giving up a little bit of blood, if not for this

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Why haven't we found a way to genocide this entire class of insects yet?

    We have. We can use CRISPR to make a virus that sterilises mosquito populations.

    We just haven't done it because, you know, bioethics.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    as long as they harrass weabos in their mons basement they have a ecolical purpose.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      that is the least likely place for mosquitos to attack

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Rather than kill them it's feasible possible to CRISPR gene edit their shit so their bites no longer irritate human skin. Assuming the CRISPR goes well and they dont start carrying bloodborne turbocancer that seems to be a pretty good solution

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      For most people on planet earth its not the itching thats the problem, its the serious diseases they give people

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        "Most of the people on the planet" are nothing like you and I.
        The ones who are suffering from mosquito-borne diseases are Black folk.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Coincidentally I dont give a single shit about "most people on planet earth". The only thing I care about is when a mosquito bites me it's uncomfortably itchy. That's also the position OP is talking about

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    OP, do you think we haven't tried?
    You're severely overestimating what humanity can do, I reckon not even a global alliance of all countries would do a dent in a century.

    As soon as we'd declare them not a problem anymore and stop any genocidal technique we found, they would boom back in population in a couple of years.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    why doesnt the shit in the water turning the frogs gay do the same for these little dracula homosexuals

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They absorb it and inject it in people

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Muh birds and fishes will die of statvation if there are no mosquitos!
    This moronic take makes me mad more than anything else In life.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You're mad at your own ignorance

      [...]

      Based beyond belief. A surprising sight on Wauf

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    usually they frick off during nice weather when it's sunny and windy. it's cloudy, humid and chill weather when they come at you.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Why haven't we found a way to genocide this entire class of insects yet?
    Why haven't you? Too stupid?

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They should definitely be genocided, we are actually looking for ways to accomplish that. Genetically modified mosquitos were released in certain areas and the population dropped by 90%.
    There are thousands of mosquito species but only a handful of them are annoying to humans, we just need to get rid of the handful while the others remain as food sources.
    It would be a massive quality of life improvement for billions of people so it would be worth it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >we are actually looking for ways to accomplish that
      You aren't doing shit

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Mosquito moron already seething. We will kill and your family, fricktard.

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They're food for bats, birds, dragonflies etc and they pollinate blueberries but other than that they're just awful

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Are there no other nocturnal insects that bats can eat?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        None of them are as abundant, none of them have the potential to be

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      None of them are as abundant, none of them have the potential to be

      Isn't killing mosquitoes the primary ecological function of those bars and dragonflies? If they die off because we kill off mosquitoes, then do we really need them?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >the primary ecological function
        Animals aren't born to perform a function, they're part of a complex ecological network where they perform a myriad of essential tasks. The more the fabric that constitutes a biome is degraded the closer it gets to collapse. Some elements, like insects, are of primary importance to keep this fabric intact. If you don't value living in a healthy environment with clean water, biodiversity and fertile soil you should just move to a metropolis.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Yes.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          that's a fruit bat

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >some things about nature are mildly inconvenient, let's just destroy it all

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    it's almost like they mimic another life form, or vice versa

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Which one?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I had never seen a mosquito with white stripes before this summer. It was a fricking invasion this year. Baguetteland

      Oy vey

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Thats the dengue variety. Stay safe.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      hohols?

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    One landed on top of my dickhead and tried to suck blood but I started peeing and blasted it off my dong.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Literally nothing anyone else can say in this thread will be as funny as this

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That's great!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      good work soldier

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *