I'm split between the crocs, wolves or the hunter, I hope the guy has other shelling options because that's gonna be a bit light for some animals and we may benefit from us both shooting
What are the conditions?
Do they all come after me at once, or one after another, do the one I choose get thier numbers back after each engagement or battle royale mode?
If its a areana and each one is behind a door rats may be best option due to sheer numbers, but bullets are faster unless there is cover to at least give time for rats to swarm the hunter.
Also worst choice is alligator,.slow as shit on land only able to do small sprints at most if I was in water however I'm screwed but then so is everything else
Thousand rats every time.
They're fast, smart, can get anywhere, and shooting them won't do shit.
Also, since there's so many of them, you can have half of them active at night fricking up with everybody else while they sleep.
Yeah, they're not chewing through bear skin or a crocodile's hide fast enough to actually harm them, but as long as they can get to their eyes it's enough.
The two gorillas are the worst choice you can make here, they have next to no offensive capabilities and low numbers, the thousand rats have no offensive capabilities and not enough numbers to overwhelm enemies, especially not after you account for the casualties they will sustain, the human wielding a double barreled shotgun is a deceptively poor choice because his weapon is only especially effective against the falcons, and even then he can only shoot one at a time, and with the average hunter carrying 20 shotgun shells for a hunt, and accounting for the shots he will miss, and how he has no advantage in close quarters, you can see how his usefulness wears off very quickly.
I remember there was a version that had 4 gorillas , replaced a cow with an elephant, hawks with 4 tigers, and also had a human in caveman gear with only a spear. Unfortunately I can't find it anywhere right now.
>one
No matter what you choose you lose, if EVERY animal is coming in a horde there's no way even the hunter will ever be able to shoot all of them in time
How well can I command the animals? If I have total control over their actions the rats and the bulls are kinda interesting choices, otherwise I'll go for the hunter. Although I don't see how the rats could possibly kill the crocodiles (or the birds lol).
choose 2 because that's how this works and OP image is wrong.
What do you guys think about a swarm build? Falcons + rats would probably frick up most of everything else. It would be about 30 rats per individual of the other species, plus the falcons. Might be a loss but you wouldn't have to worry about getting zerg rushed by something you simply don't have the numbers to counter, and the human wouldn't stand a chance.
I am a human with a gun, but my gun is much better than some boring grandpa rifle. And I have multiple guns. So i'll go with the wolves, kill everything, and share the food with my wolf bros.
I'm split between the crocs, wolves or the hunter, I hope the guy has other shelling options because that's gonna be a bit light for some animals and we may benefit from us both shooting
a thousand rats is a lot of fricking rats. a thousand isn't enough to kill all the challengers but it's enough for any of them, except for the falcon.
What are the conditions?
Do they all come after me at once, or one after another, do the one I choose get thier numbers back after each engagement or battle royale mode?
If its a areana and each one is behind a door rats may be best option due to sheer numbers, but bullets are faster unless there is cover to at least give time for rats to swarm the hunter.
Also worst choice is alligator,.slow as shit on land only able to do small sprints at most if I was in water however I'm screwed but then so is everything else
Silverbacks, ofcourse. With a little prep time and some weaponry I can make formidable bodyguards.
Thousand rats every time.
They're fast, smart, can get anywhere, and shooting them won't do shit.
Also, since there's so many of them, you can have half of them active at night fricking up with everybody else while they sleep.
Yeah, they're not chewing through bear skin or a crocodile's hide fast enough to actually harm them, but as long as they can get to their eyes it's enough.
Grizzly
The two gorillas are the worst choice you can make here, they have next to no offensive capabilities and low numbers, the thousand rats have no offensive capabilities and not enough numbers to overwhelm enemies, especially not after you account for the casualties they will sustain, the human wielding a double barreled shotgun is a deceptively poor choice because his weapon is only especially effective against the falcons, and even then he can only shoot one at a time, and with the average hunter carrying 20 shotgun shells for a hunt, and accounting for the shots he will miss, and how he has no advantage in close quarters, you can see how his usefulness wears off very quickly.
Rats. Not for any strategic reason, I just like 'em. Simple as.
Mice.
I can kill all the rest. Hard to kill 1000 mice with even the best shotgun or full auto bb gun.
The rest can be dealt with, yes even the 50 eagles and man with a shotgun. At least they can be killed.
>Posts a worse version of this image
Imagine
I remember there was a version that had 4 gorillas , replaced a cow with an elephant, hawks with 4 tigers, and also had a human in caveman gear with only a spear. Unfortunately I can't find it anywhere right now.
>3 grizzly bears
>2 gorillas
This seems unbalanced.
>one
No matter what you choose you lose, if EVERY animal is coming in a horde there's no way even the hunter will ever be able to shoot all of them in time
Bears for protection
Wolves for yiff
1000 rats. Use 100 to protect me from the bullets and the other 900 to bite the other animals.
50 falcons, easily. I'd surround myself with a swarm of meat-eating birds. Nobody could stop me.
2000 rats
How well can I command the animals? If I have total control over their actions the rats and the bulls are kinda interesting choices, otherwise I'll go for the hunter. Although I don't see how the rats could possibly kill the crocodiles (or the birds lol).
>1000 rats
>bear rolls over
>50 falcons
>bear smashes them
>15 wolves
get smashed
>1 hunter
>cant reload fast enough to kill the other bears
>7 oxen
>throats slit fast
>3 lions
>same as wolves
>9 crocs
>just skin, not armor
>2 gorrillas
>they actually think thiyre stronger than bears so they give you less
>9 crocs
>just skin, not armor
this guy doesn't know shit about crocodiles
>this guy doesn't know shit about crocodiles
against a bears claw youve got no idea
If it can handle a bite from another croc a bear’s claws aren’t doing much
a bear's claws are not carving through bone
Bears
choose 2 because that's how this works and OP image is wrong.
What do you guys think about a swarm build? Falcons + rats would probably frick up most of everything else. It would be about 30 rats per individual of the other species, plus the falcons. Might be a loss but you wouldn't have to worry about getting zerg rushed by something you simply don't have the numbers to counter, and the human wouldn't stand a chance.
This too.that would very my choice if I could choose 2
>choose an animal
>get sniped by a rifle
I'll pick the rats because I don't want to be chewed up by rats.
I am a human with a gun, but my gun is much better than some boring grandpa rifle. And I have multiple guns. So i'll go with the wolves, kill everything, and share the food with my wolf bros.
You don't get any stuff here, you're dropped in the middle of a forest with whoever you choose.
I'll choose the human with the shotgun. We can build a stone structure together after he blasts off a few rounds.
>Rats got nerfed
>Only one choice
Gross
Wait, it's only one in the image? Yeah that's gay, you should choose two.