this isn't a major problem. the department of fish and wildlife could just issue hunting tags for them
or the DFW could just pick up the bodies if they are found, possibly cutting off the head and legs with a chainsaw or something so it could be loaded into a standard pickup. gruesome but they could make it work easily, it's not an insurmountable issue
They'd adore both coasts honestly, the great plains and the mojave would be a divide in their population but if they were seeded on both sides I think they're thrive both sides. I could see them marching through appalachia or even up into new england.
lmao no, they don't even want any of the native animals. Doesn't matter which government agency you're talking about, they hate the idea of anything good happening in the US at all.
They'd adore both coasts honestly, the great plains and the mojave would be a divide in their population but if they were seeded on both sides I think they're thrive both sides. I could see them marching through appalachia or even up into new england.
imagine them wandering through the ozarks or great plains.
If you want to bring a megafauna to North America, it should be one that evolved there and died out: Camels.
IIRC, the US Army imported 70 camels on two trips from the Middle East in 18...53, I believe, to fight in the Indian wars and the Mormon wars. The first trip brought 33, one died en route but two were born so 34 made the trip and the second brought the rest.
IDR the reason, exactly, but the camels were abandoned in what are now Arizona, New Mexico and western Texas. The feral camels survived until the 1960s, IINM, when the last confirmed sighting occured in Arizona.
People occasionally report seeing camels in the region but no sightings have ever been confirmed. There are also reports of fricking ghost camels, lol
Strangely enough, I saw a camel a few years ago in Pennsylvania just sitting in the snow on the side of the road but not once on the American Southwest. If memory serves, that particular camel was being hauled from-and-to somewhere and the vehicle broke down so they let the camel out to stretch its legs a bit while awaiting repairs.
>Giraffe is standing on Train Tracks, eating exposed leaves >Doesn't get scared by train horn >Gets liquefied and stopes train for several hours
And let's not even get started on what would happen if a car hit one of them.
If I was a billionaire, this is what I would do. But like make it seem fake or something, have a "zoo" out in oklahoma or something and then just accidentally have a bunch escape
I used to live in a part of rural Oregon where some richgay imported a bunch of white fallow deer. Of course it's really difficult to keep deer contained and some escaped and started interbreeding with the native whitetails. Some mornings I'd be driving to work and big white stag would just sort of appear out of the fog.
There was that drug dealer that brought in a dozen hippos in South America and after he died they just started roaming the land. Government homosexuals though are trying to kill them off.
You can't because animal rights homosexuals WHO DON'T EVEN LIVE IN COLOMBIA got upset about some super shooter guy with the best aim ever killing one from, like, a million meters away or some shit. One. They got pissed about a single fricking hippo getting shit and petitioned some homosexual judge to pass some homosexual law that makes it illegal to kill some invasive homosexual species THAT SHOULDN'T BE IN COLOMBIA IN THE FIRST FRICKING PLACE.
https://i.imgur.com/l4AJZlR.jpg
Hearst Castle in California has a herd of loose zebras after they escaped from a menagerie. There's also an entire population of nilgai, thirty to forty thousand, in Texas after they were brought onto ranches for hunting.
Hearst Castle in California has a herd of loose zebras after they escaped from a menagerie. There's also an entire population of nilgai, thirty to forty thousand, in Texas after they were brought onto ranches for hunting.
>This was one of his favorites. He said once, “I didn’t know they could train giraffes to do this.” No one ever told him this was animated. >He was a proud member of the Masonic Lodge,
I hate freemasons
>thread about "haha what if we make funny long antelope into invasive species?" >turns into zoophile thread
Why. Why can't we just talk about animals like normal people for once?
I unironically wish these people would die. Keep in mind that there is a very large overlap between zoophilia and pedophilia too.
https://i.imgur.com/2KGdHst.jpg
Is there ANY negative to releasing these all over the US?
I don't think giraffe could live in the northern half of the Americas.
They can eat the stuff here, but oak trees and most others aren't evergreens. They would have very little to eat through the winter. They can't eat pine of any kind.
They could maybe do well in higher altitude areas of Mexico and further down to Brazil. I definitely think they could live in Brazil.
I'm not sure, result from searching it up said they can't eat pine or eucalyptus.
I had heard pine has creosote in it, and if you burn it and breathe it, you're gonna frick your lungs up really badly. Maybe that's part of it.
the negative is making africans seethe and mald that their megafauna do better in an environment with more industrial encroachment than their native lands solely due to poaching and nignoggery
They would be great to eat, which would make cityfolk gnash their teeth
Alan Quartermain said they have wonderful marrow, I'd like to test that
also, whatever trees they prefer are totally fricked
where's the lie? america has been importing the third world for decades, and most of its population and all of its major cities have become violent third world shit holes because of it.
There are more deer in the US now than there ever was. Turns out if you remove 99% of their predators and competition they become a pest.
The reason deer hunting is so popular is because its conservation hunting, culling the numbers so they dont boom and bust.
Americans would want to hunt them even if they were critically endangered.
Hunters' interests accidentally allign with conservation, but only partially. Start talking about reintroduction of native predators and they'll quickly show how little they care about ecosystems.
Bringing them back from the brink of extinction after injuns almost killed them all like the rest of the megafauna? Native populations world over killed their megafauna, wypipo brought them back.
they wouldn't survive in most places, and also they can easily and would inevitably kill humans, pets, etc.
I don't understand why those are problems. This isn't an antinatalist or nihilist perspective, either: having megafauna be introduced to a select area at the minor risk of people there is absolutely a boon.
>he fell for the victor-written history
Protestant colonists attempted outright genetic and cultural genocide against the native peoples, and part of that was the mass slaughter of buffalo to force them to live a more english lifestyle dependent on farmers rather than readily available wildlife.
They did bring them back, but as an apology for almost exterminating them.
Buffalo numbers were pretty low before Euros arrived, due to native hunting. The giant herds we think of when we think of the wild west only existed because old world diseases wiped out ~90% of the natives, and thus reduced hunting by ~90%.
what boon is there to introducing potentially dangerous megafauna? if we just want to see the giraffes we already have them in every zoo in our country.
tell me with a straight face having magnificent beasts wandering outside killing errant nignogs and methheads is a bad idea
9 months ago
Anonymous
blacks all live on their protected reserves aka american cities. giraffes wouldn't be allowed there. the only people who would fall victim to angry stomping murder giraffes are exurban white people and their children and pets.
>every zoo in our country.
Of my three local zoos, I'm only certain that one of them had giraffes. Lemme check on the other two, brb
9 months ago
Anonymous
Two do, the third does not. And it looks like one of the two allows guests to feed giraffes by hand.
The one that didn't have giraffes has pudus. Didn't even know wtfa pudu was before looking up to see if they had giraffes. They're cute and nifty. I want to lick one
Here's a baby pudu with mommy
9 months ago
Anonymous
>I want to lick one
9 months ago
Anonymous
>lick a pudu
9 months ago
Anonymous
>lick a pudu
Looks like a teddy bear fricked a deer. Of course I want to lick a pudu. Yudu, tu.
9 months ago
Anonymous
I don't want to lick a teddy bear or a deer so why would I want to lick their bastard child?
That’s because America was wildlife for most of its existence. Not saying Europeans get off scot free, since Europeans are more likely to hunt and eat weird shit.
Yeah, it's important to remember that North America basically has a massive missing ecological niche that is being actively suppressed by humans. Anything larger than a deer is kind of fricked, but the plants don't know that yet so you get trees with weird thorns.
>Try to live your entire life on meat and you'll be great.
Sure, there are many examples, in deserts mostly. >Try to live your entire life on vegetables and you'll have a shitton of health issues.
Millions of Indians have lived for centuries without meat, they are fine, it's even a miracle they can survive in their shithole. >Dogs eat grass sometimes. They're still carnivores.
There are degrees in carnivorism: dogs diet includes less meat than cats diet for example.
9 months ago
Anonymous
>indians living without meat
You do realize these people are extremely frail and brittle correct
They are unable to survive without charity, and this is in a region where every crop is in season every single day
9 months ago
Anonymous
Most still eat chicken and other non sacred animals if not going the "no harm to any living being" road, the most extreme wear masks to not hurt germs by breathing them in but that doesn't change that most of them are physically very fragile like the other anon said
I guess you're right about their fragility.
Maybe there is a huge difference in health between vegetarian and vegetalian as well?
Most still eat chicken and other non sacred animals if not going the "no harm to any living being" road, the most extreme wear masks to not hurt germs by breathing them in but that doesn't change that most of them are physically very fragile like the other anon said
>the most extreme wear masks to not hurt germs by breathing them in
This sounds very extreme indeed, I knew some people don't eat mushroom, which can make some sense considering they're heterotrophs and closer to animals than to plants (Opisthokonts), but not breathing germs is something else...
9 months ago
Anonymous
Yeah there likely is since eggs, diary and other animal products like honey are very nutritious while vegetalians (vegans cover every area of life, vegetalian just the diet without pledge and is the OG word) don't get them at all so the need for supplements or imported goods such as more exotic fruits/veggies/plants your region doesn't have may be requiered to keep your food intake diverse and with more nutrients, but then again import issues are true for other diets due to how the market works
9 months ago
Anonymous
Thank you for the explanations. >but then again import issues are true for other diets due to how the market works
Yes, sadly.
9 months ago
Anonymous
Most still eat chicken and other non sacred animals if not going the "no harm to any living being" road, the most extreme wear masks to not hurt germs by breathing them in but that doesn't change that most of them are physically very fragile like the other anon said
9 months ago
Anonymous
Buddha warned them about spooks but they didn't listen
The longest live people are the okinawans and they're nearly vegetarian
9 months ago
Anonymous
living past 70 is a waste of your time and cruel to everyone else unless you are actively employed as a teacher (for children because your iq score will be in the low 80s and you’ll be unable to answer difficult questions or remember what happened yesterday)
have you ever had the displeasure of watching someone age? by 70 its either sad or sad and irritating
and the worst fricking thing is if you eat meat you’ll probably still pass 80. horrible. time to ditch chicken and lay on the bacon.
9 months ago
Anonymous
if you eat mostly fish/white meat but avoid processed foods you’ll probably end up in your 90s. take up smoking and buy a motorcycle.
The longest live people are the okinawans and they're nearly vegetarian
Beware genetics and class, because short people and people who don’t eat goyslop also live longer, but yes living too long is moronic. Literally 0 benefit to being 90 except being an irrational animal with a genetic drive to avoid dying. Suicide rates steadily increase with age and high IQ scores relative to the average for that age group correlate with higher suicide rates.
9 months ago
Anonymous
brb buying a SUZUKI HAYABUSA
9 months ago
Anonymous
>Literally 0 benefit to being 90
You will see the 22nd century
9 months ago
Anonymous
lol
Your family and community just have shitgenes lmao
My nan lived to be 106. She was smart as a whip and walked literal miles daily (my parents' house was two miles from church and she insisted on being active in that community with all the other ancient parishioners.)
She would have gone on longer but she fell out of a tree. That's right. A fricking centenarian was climbing trees. See, she had this belief stuck in her head that any fruit you can reach won't be as good as fruit from higher branches. idk how true it is, but she definitely thought it was genuine word of God. So when she decided to go back to her house rather than live with my parents, she had no tall ass grand kids to reach fruit for her so up she went, down and came and severely injured she was. She stuck around another few months then finally croaked while birdwatching from her balcony.
9 months ago
Anonymous
Your community had a common ancestor that was not entirely human
There’s a reason stories like these never refer to large populations
9 months ago
Anonymous
1.64 million of us. We're actually studied because people wonder why the frick we live so long. We do all the things that Anglo medicine and diet science say are supposedly wrong and unhealthy. We eat pork. We eat a HUGE amount of simple, refined carbohydrates. We eat an enormous amount of fat. Many of us, tho no one in my immediate family, smoke. We drink. A lot. And we eschew a lot of traditional medicine (desire her age, Nan took only three pills daily and two weren't even prescribed to her lmao, one was an over the counter "joint health" thing and the other some fish oil capsules). Yet we still manage to have one of the greatest /confirmed/ life expectations in the world (Japan claims to have a lot of people living long, active lives but pension fraud is rampant there; y'know, where Gramma dies but they family don't report it so they can keep connecting her pension).
You do not need one single scrap of plant matter to live 70-80 years in natural conditions. Most people would die of some plague or injury before that and you would actually dodge dental disease as a huge plus. However, your diet would not resemble a modern steak eater. Ancient humans went heavy on organ meats and fish, fatty red meat was a treat and cured/fried shit basically didn’t exist for thousands of years.
Anything beyond that is entirely dependent on highly unnatural acts of civilization
lol
at first, I thought you were joking but you actually believe this bullshit
lmao
9 months ago
Anonymous
Proof to the contrary? Without a shitty study group like nutrition nerd vegans throwing back exotic supplement smoothies daily vs, mcdonalds enjoyers? Didn’t think so
>bbbut your chances of heart disease after 70 wwwwill be higher
Eat more fish and less blubber and not by much. You are essentially dying after 50 anyways and suicide before 80 is encouraged. Everyone older than that is a borderline vegetable with the IQ score of a toddler and almost none if their original personality left intact.
9 months ago
Anonymous
living past 50 is basically prolonged suffering for someone elses benefit. these days its the tax collectors because families disperse like wolf packs. we should be eating nothing but potatoes fried in seed oil to stick it to the man. frick meat, frick berries, frick tubers. eat more fries.
9 months ago
Anonymous
>fries
Those ARE tubers, you mong.
9 months ago
Anonymous
How much do you want? For one, there is no single set ancient human diet since what was available to early humans varied drastically location to location and many in the tropical and other fertile areas (IE the places that literally birthed civilisation) were largely frugivorous/herbivorous, eating meat perhaps a third of the time.
Here's one article.
https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1470393/
I can provide dozens of others that will also say humans have been eating cooked tubers and grains for about 2,000,000 years. Since the brain literally runs on carbohydrates, the consumption of starch at that time gave homosexual sapiens the edge over competitor hominins.
Meat consumption happened, of course, and rightly continues to this day, but to claim that plant foods, especially starchy ones, played no role in human development is not only completely divorced from reality but also wholly fricking moronic.
The interplay of meat and cooked starch in the diet is literally what allowed our ancestors to become the dominant species. Starch powered they're brains to allow them the intelligence to develop more sophisticated hunting techniques all the way down to the invention of husbandry. Without starch, this simply would have never happened.
Try to live your entire life on meat and you'll be great.
Try to live your entire life on vegetables and you'll have a shitton of health issues.
So, no, we're carnivores.
Dogs eat grass sometimes. They're still carnivores.
Have you not seen this pic? Have you really no sense of humour?
I would totally love to eat that giraffe girl out. But since I refuse zoophilia, I can't "eat out" that giraffe. I can't be omnivore or carnivore in a sexual manner.
>Thinks herbivores can't kill >Thinks deer won't eat meat or hunt mice when starved >Doesn't think long bodied animals can swallow a man whole.
You best watch yourself the next time you head on a safari or to the zoo. The giraffes are watching you too.
I used to not mind voregays, thinking their fetish was too fantastical and unrealistic like inflationgays. But after seeing so many zoosadists into content of animals being eaten, and not natural circle of life documentary stuff but captive live prey feeding in shitty little close confines, and the webm of the woman dressed up as a cat eating live mice, voregays are pretty fricked. It's usually depicted so goofily that it's easy to forget it's still snuff.
You ever seen what happens to a car that hits a moose?
yeah, not a big deal when it's a rare occurence
They'd probably compete with local herbivores.
If I was an alien and you described a unicorn and a giraffe to me, I would believe in the unicorn and not the giraffe.
>They'd probably compete with local herbivores.
obligate high browsers wouldn't compete at all with any existing herbivores. Deer are low browsers or rear up to get at low-hanging branches, but giraffes would eat 10 feet up from there and almost exclusively. The only ones that could hypothetically reach that high, moose, can eat lower branches and eat a lot of aquatic plants AND would nary cohabitate with giraffes considering their taiga/wetland adaptations while giraffe are hot forest/jungle adapted.
Giraffe eat within 1-3 metres from the ground just like all the animals they cohabitate with. Theres only been actual field work in this area over the past decade and it's not what biologists expected at all. Its not a small amount of foraging either its like 80% of their feeding is a metre off the ground. Yet another 'long neck' Darwinian theory of natural selection btfo by nature doing whatever the frick it wants. You'd think it would mog other species but no it leans over like an idiot.
While that's very interesting, I hesitate to say it would produce a problem for their cohabitation with north american animals. Thank you for this extra info though.
There corpses would clutter up the landscape.
Of their victims, you mean.
Might as well import some gryphons and dragons while we're at it.
Griphons are my favorite animal, so I agree.
>Gryphons
I wish Gilda was real
Go back to furaffinity, tourist.
Chill, dweeb
what are you? a fricking meadowBlack person?
lmao
this isn't a major problem. the department of fish and wildlife could just issue hunting tags for them
or the DFW could just pick up the bodies if they are found, possibly cutting off the head and legs with a chainsaw or something so it could be loaded into a standard pickup. gruesome but they could make it work easily, it's not an insurmountable issue
I agree.
giwtwm
lmao he actually looked like he was into it lmao
I mean, he did open his mouth
you can't be raped by a giraffe since no reasonable person would resist a giraffe's advances
what is up with all the graphuckers itt
idk it seems pretty self-explanatory
idgi
idgi = I dig giraffe insemination
That is not what I meant >:(
sure it wasn't
What is the best place in the USA where giraffes would thrive?
I am thinking this area, in Northern California, may be good for giraffes. similar to the Savannah.
this is the top right corner of California.
They'd adore both coasts honestly, the great plains and the mojave would be a divide in their population but if they were seeded on both sides I think they're thrive both sides. I could see them marching through appalachia or even up into new england.
is there any way the US Forest Service would seriously consider a proposal to transplant giraffes in the USA?
Which agency would be in charge of that? Forest Service or someone else
lmao no, they don't even want any of the native animals. Doesn't matter which government agency you're talking about, they hate the idea of anything good happening in the US at all.
what would happen if people smuggled giraffes into the country from mexico and set up a breeding operation for them?
You think the US government would issue hunting tags for them?
I doubt it, they don't care about invasive species either.
imagine them wandering through the ozarks or great plains.
Theu can decapitate a lion with a single kick and they are very territorial.
Sounds like a good trait to have when surrounded by Blacks.
why giraffes instead of elephants
ideally both.
Giraffes are pretty.
I would a spotless giraffe when she's at least double the height
When she's at precisely the correct stature that doesn't call for a pail?
obvious ai
Imagine domesticating giraffes and riding them around town. There's no reason it wouldn't be possible.
If you want to bring a megafauna to North America, it should be one that evolved there and died out: Camels.
I agree entirely. There's no reason not to bring both varieties over to north america.
IIRC, the US Army imported 70 camels on two trips from the Middle East in 18...53, I believe, to fight in the Indian wars and the Mormon wars. The first trip brought 33, one died en route but two were born so 34 made the trip and the second brought the rest.
IDR the reason, exactly, but the camels were abandoned in what are now Arizona, New Mexico and western Texas. The feral camels survived until the 1960s, IINM, when the last confirmed sighting occured in Arizona.
People occasionally report seeing camels in the region but no sightings have ever been confirmed. There are also reports of fricking ghost camels, lol
Strangely enough, I saw a camel a few years ago in Pennsylvania just sitting in the snow on the side of the road but not once on the American Southwest. If memory serves, that particular camel was being hauled from-and-to somewhere and the vehicle broke down so they let the camel out to stretch its legs a bit while awaiting repairs.
kino
Did you take any pics of the camel?
Driving in the highway. Couldn't exactly do that but I'm sure somebody pulled over and snapped a shot. Gimme a sec to Google it.
Neat
cute camel. We should breed a mini version of them.
America is a nation of invasive species, bigot
Didn't lions also live in North America at one point? They should be brought back too
>Giraffe is standing on Train Tracks, eating exposed leaves
>Doesn't get scared by train horn
>Gets liquefied and stopes train for several hours
And let's not even get started on what would happen if a car hit one of them.
The trains don't run on time and constantly get derailed anyway. Just trim the tree branches further back from the tracks.
I can't imagine a giraffe not getting scared off by a train horn.
There would be morons that would try to hurt them.
Importing invasive species from Africa to the Americas has never led to negative consequences throughout history. Bring it on.
Wait, are there other examples?
black people would either be scared or just shoot them indiscriminately
I come to this fricking board for dinosaurs and these are the threads I end up in...
I didn't intend for this thread to be furgays. I just wanted to release megafauna in north america because I think it would be based.
Dinosaur threads are even shittier than bestiality threads.
yea.. i'd be fricking them non stop
If I was a billionaire, this is what I would do. But like make it seem fake or something, have a "zoo" out in oklahoma or something and then just accidentally have a bunch escape
That is an excellent idea.
I wonder if any billionaire has already done something like this with other animals
You could totally do it with some non-traditional livestock animals. Emu, rhea, ostrich, camel, antelope, etc.
>You could totally do it with some non-traditional livestock animals.
phrasing
?
I'll stick to giraffes to accomodate my larger-than-average size, endurance, and general good looks
I used to live in a part of rural Oregon where some richgay imported a bunch of white fallow deer. Of course it's really difficult to keep deer contained and some escaped and started interbreeding with the native whitetails. Some mornings I'd be driving to work and big white stag would just sort of appear out of the fog.
There was that drug dealer that brought in a dozen hippos in South America and after he died they just started roaming the land. Government homosexuals though are trying to kill them off.
>ywn be able to kill hippos with your buddies in colombia
You can't because animal rights homosexuals WHO DON'T EVEN LIVE IN COLOMBIA got upset about some super shooter guy with the best aim ever killing one from, like, a million meters away or some shit. One. They got pissed about a single fricking hippo getting shit and petitioned some homosexual judge to pass some homosexual law that makes it illegal to kill some invasive homosexual species THAT SHOULDN'T BE IN COLOMBIA IN THE FIRST FRICKING PLACE.
Neat
Hearst Castle in California has a herd of loose zebras after they escaped from a menagerie. There's also an entire population of nilgai, thirty to forty thousand, in Texas after they were brought onto ranches for hunting.
Aw snap! called out.
Good man, frick them jannies. Can't stop real men from enjoying those sleek slender giraffe curves.
Lol guess the jannies aren't real men
Is... she winking at me?
>she
>This was one of his favorites. He said once, “I didn’t know they could train giraffes to do this.” No one ever told him this was animated.
>He was a proud member of the Masonic Lodge,
I hate freemasons
>thread about "haha what if we make funny long antelope into invasive species?"
>turns into zoophile thread
Why. Why can't we just talk about animals like normal people for once?
What would you like to say about animals, friend?
It's a giraffe thread, it was bound to happen.
Giraffes are big and cute, I like their long necks and funny walks
I unironically wish these people would die. Keep in mind that there is a very large overlap between zoophilia and pedophilia too.
I don't think giraffe could live in the northern half of the Americas.
They can eat the stuff here, but oak trees and most others aren't evergreens. They would have very little to eat through the winter. They can't eat pine of any kind.
They could maybe do well in higher altitude areas of Mexico and further down to Brazil. I definitely think they could live in Brazil.
>They can't eat pine of any kind.
How come?
I'm not sure, result from searching it up said they can't eat pine or eucalyptus.
I had heard pine has creosote in it, and if you burn it and breathe it, you're gonna frick your lungs up really badly. Maybe that's part of it.
>they can't eat [...]eucalyptus
Finally, an animal that can't invade Australia.
have a nice day immediately discord degenerates
But what have we done?
Bronies
The furry fandom
Eh
is more monster girl then furry
Yes, you're right. (The feral is still cuter.)
Im worried about your mental health
Horrors beyond imagining
>Human face on a giraffe
Horrors indeed
Run
I can do it for you
President Xi Jinping owes me a giraffe gf.
If I had the money, I would spend a lifetime selectively breeding giraffes until I had a domesticated breed that was saddle-capable.
Living the dream.
>new Clash of Clans troop
Giraffe rider
forgot the img
Mass increase of transphobia
sign me up
?
Everything increases transphobia these days to be fair. It's like global warming. Or global warming deniers.
the negative is making africans seethe and mald that their megafauna do better in an environment with more industrial encroachment than their native lands solely due to poaching and nignoggery
No! Only positives! Please I beg you, release them everywhere!
imagine
>black tounge
But does that also mean. . .
?
Yes see
what about their dongs?
Pink and like 3 feet long.
Exotic erotics offers a 1:1 replica of a giraffe dong for zoological parks and for universities. There are smaller replicas as well.
Additionally, a 1:1 giraffe tongue can be bought in this store as well as some smaller sizes.
>for zoological parks and for universities
Who do they think they're kidding?
Lots of stupid zoomers will get killed
They would be great to eat, which would make cityfolk gnash their teeth
Alan Quartermain said they have wonderful marrow, I'd like to test that
also, whatever trees they prefer are totally fricked
this is one of the main reasons for introducing them. Imagine the level of hunting we could provide.
it hurts bros
Would fug
have a nice day
U mad?
They would be abused by americans and Chinese tourists
I find that extremely unlikely. Do you know how big giraffes actually are?
big enough that I could comfortably perform cunnilingus on one standing up, but not so big that I'd need a stepladder
You must be a basketball player then. Their cunnies are at least 7' high.
okay a bucket might be required
they wouldn't survive in most places, and also they can easily and would inevitably kill humans, pets, etc.
It might be bad for the native plants but idk.
americans are violent morons that will shoot 80% of them. The rest will be run-over by traffic or smash their heads into power lines
>oi mate I’m an ekspurt
Why are they like this?
such lewd animals
yeah, dumb yanks would shoot them for fun
you guys don't really think this right?
I do
where's the lie? america has been importing the third world for decades, and most of its population and all of its major cities have become violent third world shit holes because of it.
you got me, good point
Deer population in all of europe:
>9.5 million
Deer population in United states:
>36 million
Europe has decimated their wildlife, on land and sea.
Americans are PETA tier when it comes to wildlife management compared to Europeans.
There are more deer in the US now than there ever was. Turns out if you remove 99% of their predators and competition they become a pest.
The reason deer hunting is so popular is because its conservation hunting, culling the numbers so they dont boom and bust.
Americans would want to hunt them even if they were critically endangered.
Hunters' interests accidentally allign with conservation, but only partially. Start talking about reintroduction of native predators and they'll quickly show how little they care about ecosystems.
You don't know shit.
>decimated
You're ewesing that wrong.
Tell me again what happened to buffalos
collateral in a genocide campaign that historians are conspiring not to call a genocide. they survived, thankfully.
ask a canadian what happened to the inuits dogs while you're at it.
Bringing them back from the brink of extinction after injuns almost killed them all like the rest of the megafauna? Native populations world over killed their megafauna, wypipo brought them back.
I don't understand why those are problems. This isn't an antinatalist or nihilist perspective, either: having megafauna be introduced to a select area at the minor risk of people there is absolutely a boon.
>he fell for the victor-written history
Protestant colonists attempted outright genetic and cultural genocide against the native peoples, and part of that was the mass slaughter of buffalo to force them to live a more english lifestyle dependent on farmers rather than readily available wildlife.
They did bring them back, but as an apology for almost exterminating them.
Buffalo numbers were pretty low before Euros arrived, due to native hunting. The giant herds we think of when we think of the wild west only existed because old world diseases wiped out ~90% of the natives, and thus reduced hunting by ~90%.
>ignore historical record, accept the feefees of primitives as word of god
No.
what boon is there to introducing potentially dangerous megafauna? if we just want to see the giraffes we already have them in every zoo in our country.
tell me with a straight face having magnificent beasts wandering outside killing errant nignogs and methheads is a bad idea
blacks all live on their protected reserves aka american cities. giraffes wouldn't be allowed there. the only people who would fall victim to angry stomping murder giraffes are exurban white people and their children and pets.
>every zoo in our country.
Of my three local zoos, I'm only certain that one of them had giraffes. Lemme check on the other two, brb
Two do, the third does not. And it looks like one of the two allows guests to feed giraffes by hand.
The one that didn't have giraffes has pudus. Didn't even know wtfa pudu was before looking up to see if they had giraffes. They're cute and nifty. I want to lick one
Here's a baby pudu with mommy
>I want to lick one
>lick a pudu
Looks like a teddy bear fricked a deer. Of course I want to lick a pudu. Yudu, tu.
I don't want to lick a teddy bear or a deer so why would I want to lick their bastard child?
Because yudu.
only pudu. Ever thought of that?
Whodu?
fewdu
Youdu
duwut
Its like a deer capybara
It's like the pony version of a deer.
>after injuns almost killed them all
most historically literate American
>he doesn't know
European bisons had it even worse (not to mention the wild aurochs), that's not the own you think it is.
>American Bison population: 500,000
>European Bison population: 8,500
That’s because America was wildlife for most of its existence. Not saying Europeans get off scot free, since Europeans are more likely to hunt and eat weird shit.
by PETA, you mean killing left and right?
I doubt american tree species are developed to handle an animal that can actively eat its leaves.
Some actually still have adaptations to avoid predation from megafauna.
Yeah, it's important to remember that North America basically has a massive missing ecological niche that is being actively suppressed by humans. Anything larger than a deer is kind of fricked, but the plants don't know that yet so you get trees with weird thorns.
Maybe we can reintroduce some wooly mammoths, as a treat.
indian elephants are their closest relative, right?
yeah
well all of our best trees are way too fricking tall for even a giraffe to eat them
giraffe would end up clearing out a lot of invasive trees funny enough, like mimosas
Yes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priapism
Is be knocking over coffee cups and books all day
Majestic creatures!
have a nice day
hidden
It wouldn't be safe to go outside anymore
Wish that were me
But they are herbivores!
But I am a herbivore!
>But I am a herbivore!
humans are obligate carnivores m8
>humans are obligate carnivores
Humans are obligate Ominvores
Try to live your entire life on meat and you'll be great.
Try to live your entire life on vegetables and you'll have a shitton of health issues.
So, no, we're carnivores.
Dogs eat grass sometimes. They're still carnivores.
>Try to live your entire life on meat and you'll be great.
Sure, there are many examples, in deserts mostly.
>Try to live your entire life on vegetables and you'll have a shitton of health issues.
Millions of Indians have lived for centuries without meat, they are fine, it's even a miracle they can survive in their shithole.
>Dogs eat grass sometimes. They're still carnivores.
There are degrees in carnivorism: dogs diet includes less meat than cats diet for example.
>indians living without meat
You do realize these people are extremely frail and brittle correct
They are unable to survive without charity, and this is in a region where every crop is in season every single day
I guess you're right about their fragility.
Maybe there is a huge difference in health between vegetarian and vegetalian as well?
>the most extreme wear masks to not hurt germs by breathing them in
This sounds very extreme indeed, I knew some people don't eat mushroom, which can make some sense considering they're heterotrophs and closer to animals than to plants (Opisthokonts), but not breathing germs is something else...
Yeah there likely is since eggs, diary and other animal products like honey are very nutritious while vegetalians (vegans cover every area of life, vegetalian just the diet without pledge and is the OG word) don't get them at all so the need for supplements or imported goods such as more exotic fruits/veggies/plants your region doesn't have may be requiered to keep your food intake diverse and with more nutrients, but then again import issues are true for other diets due to how the market works
Thank you for the explanations.
>but then again import issues are true for other diets due to how the market works
Yes, sadly.
Most still eat chicken and other non sacred animals if not going the "no harm to any living being" road, the most extreme wear masks to not hurt germs by breathing them in but that doesn't change that most of them are physically very fragile like the other anon said
Buddha warned them about spooks but they didn't listen
The longest live people are the okinawans and they're nearly vegetarian
living past 70 is a waste of your time and cruel to everyone else unless you are actively employed as a teacher (for children because your iq score will be in the low 80s and you’ll be unable to answer difficult questions or remember what happened yesterday)
have you ever had the displeasure of watching someone age? by 70 its either sad or sad and irritating
and the worst fricking thing is if you eat meat you’ll probably still pass 80. horrible. time to ditch chicken and lay on the bacon.
if you eat mostly fish/white meat but avoid processed foods you’ll probably end up in your 90s. take up smoking and buy a motorcycle.
Beware genetics and class, because short people and people who don’t eat goyslop also live longer, but yes living too long is moronic. Literally 0 benefit to being 90 except being an irrational animal with a genetic drive to avoid dying. Suicide rates steadily increase with age and high IQ scores relative to the average for that age group correlate with higher suicide rates.
brb buying a SUZUKI HAYABUSA
>Literally 0 benefit to being 90
You will see the 22nd century
lol
Your family and community just have shitgenes lmao
My nan lived to be 106. She was smart as a whip and walked literal miles daily (my parents' house was two miles from church and she insisted on being active in that community with all the other ancient parishioners.)
She would have gone on longer but she fell out of a tree. That's right. A fricking centenarian was climbing trees. See, she had this belief stuck in her head that any fruit you can reach won't be as good as fruit from higher branches. idk how true it is, but she definitely thought it was genuine word of God. So when she decided to go back to her house rather than live with my parents, she had no tall ass grand kids to reach fruit for her so up she went, down and came and severely injured she was. She stuck around another few months then finally croaked while birdwatching from her balcony.
Your community had a common ancestor that was not entirely human
There’s a reason stories like these never refer to large populations
1.64 million of us. We're actually studied because people wonder why the frick we live so long. We do all the things that Anglo medicine and diet science say are supposedly wrong and unhealthy. We eat pork. We eat a HUGE amount of simple, refined carbohydrates. We eat an enormous amount of fat. Many of us, tho no one in my immediate family, smoke. We drink. A lot. And we eschew a lot of traditional medicine (desire her age, Nan took only three pills daily and two weren't even prescribed to her lmao, one was an over the counter "joint health" thing and the other some fish oil capsules). Yet we still manage to have one of the greatest /confirmed/ life expectations in the world (Japan claims to have a lot of people living long, active lives but pension fraud is rampant there; y'know, where Gramma dies but they family don't report it so they can keep connecting her pension).
You do not need one single scrap of plant matter to live 70-80 years in natural conditions. Most people would die of some plague or injury before that and you would actually dodge dental disease as a huge plus. However, your diet would not resemble a modern steak eater. Ancient humans went heavy on organ meats and fish, fatty red meat was a treat and cured/fried shit basically didn’t exist for thousands of years.
Anything beyond that is entirely dependent on highly unnatural acts of civilization
lol
at first, I thought you were joking but you actually believe this bullshit
lmao
Proof to the contrary? Without a shitty study group like nutrition nerd vegans throwing back exotic supplement smoothies daily vs, mcdonalds enjoyers? Didn’t think so
>bbbut your chances of heart disease after 70 wwwwill be higher
Eat more fish and less blubber and not by much. You are essentially dying after 50 anyways and suicide before 80 is encouraged. Everyone older than that is a borderline vegetable with the IQ score of a toddler and almost none if their original personality left intact.
living past 50 is basically prolonged suffering for someone elses benefit. these days its the tax collectors because families disperse like wolf packs. we should be eating nothing but potatoes fried in seed oil to stick it to the man. frick meat, frick berries, frick tubers. eat more fries.
>fries
Those ARE tubers, you mong.
How much do you want? For one, there is no single set ancient human diet since what was available to early humans varied drastically location to location and many in the tropical and other fertile areas (IE the places that literally birthed civilisation) were largely frugivorous/herbivorous, eating meat perhaps a third of the time.
Here's one article.
https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1470393/
I can provide dozens of others that will also say humans have been eating cooked tubers and grains for about 2,000,000 years. Since the brain literally runs on carbohydrates, the consumption of starch at that time gave homosexual sapiens the edge over competitor hominins.
Meat consumption happened, of course, and rightly continues to this day, but to claim that plant foods, especially starchy ones, played no role in human development is not only completely divorced from reality but also wholly fricking moronic.
The interplay of meat and cooked starch in the diet is literally what allowed our ancestors to become the dominant species. Starch powered they're brains to allow them the intelligence to develop more sophisticated hunting techniques all the way down to the invention of husbandry. Without starch, this simply would have never happened.
Have you not seen this pic? Have you really no sense of humour?
I would totally love to eat that giraffe girl out. But since I refuse zoophilia, I can't "eat out" that giraffe. I can't be omnivore or carnivore in a sexual manner.
misquote?
>Thinks herbivores can't kill
>Thinks deer won't eat meat or hunt mice when starved
>Doesn't think long bodied animals can swallow a man whole.
You best watch yourself the next time you head on a safari or to the zoo. The giraffes are watching you too.
based and vorepilled
I used to not mind voregays, thinking their fetish was too fantastical and unrealistic like inflationgays. But after seeing so many zoosadists into content of animals being eaten, and not natural circle of life documentary stuff but captive live prey feeding in shitty little close confines, and the webm of the woman dressed up as a cat eating live mice, voregays are pretty fricked. It's usually depicted so goofily that it's easy to forget it's still snuff.
I prefer the version where she has enormous breasts
No acacias in murica. They're like Koalas and it's actually pretty hard to feed them hay or other leaves.
You for real? That's annoying if so. I'll look into it.
have a nice day
kissu
Kinda weird that these freakish animals that defy belief are mogged in media by a horse with a horn on it's head.
They'd probably compete with local herbivores.
If I was an alien and you described a unicorn and a giraffe to me, I would believe in the unicorn and not the giraffe.
In fairness the unicorns got casualized from a more chimeric form.
You ever seen what happens to a car that hits a moose?
Imagine being a driver so bad that you can't avoid a fricking giraffe
But I'm not a woman.
can they eat what we have?
of course
yeah, not a big deal when it's a rare occurence
>They'd probably compete with local herbivores.
obligate high browsers wouldn't compete at all with any existing herbivores. Deer are low browsers or rear up to get at low-hanging branches, but giraffes would eat 10 feet up from there and almost exclusively. The only ones that could hypothetically reach that high, moose, can eat lower branches and eat a lot of aquatic plants AND would nary cohabitate with giraffes considering their taiga/wetland adaptations while giraffe are hot forest/jungle adapted.
Moose in Maine are managed so that the counties with high traffic have less to none so they don’t kill people
Wouldn't that frick up with bird nests and roosting spaces?
Frick birds
yes
Giraffe eat within 1-3 metres from the ground just like all the animals they cohabitate with. Theres only been actual field work in this area over the past decade and it's not what biologists expected at all. Its not a small amount of foraging either its like 80% of their feeding is a metre off the ground. Yet another 'long neck' Darwinian theory of natural selection btfo by nature doing whatever the frick it wants. You'd think it would mog other species but no it leans over like an idiot.
I was looking up giraffes bending down to eat and got this lol
While that's very interesting, I hesitate to say it would produce a problem for their cohabitation with north american animals. Thank you for this extra info though.