>i'm sorry we can't intervene, we're just passive observers recording the majesty of nature

>i'm sorry we can't intervene, we're just passive observers recording the majesty of nature
why are documentarists such scumbags? it is obvious that they just want a spectacle for the numbed masses.

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

  1. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not my problem

  2. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    reminder

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >a movie didn't depict thing with 100% accuracy? that must mean thing never happened!
      low IQ thought pattern

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Persistence hunting always struck me as suspicious

      Maybe someone thought "Black folk are so dumb they'd probably do that"

      Yeah, sure, this giant, energy consuming, heat generating brain evolved to... walk towards things as long as they were visible. Wolves are more sophisticated than that. Wolves herd prey into a desirable area over the course of days and then work to corner the weak, and often young, by flanking their victim and kill them with many wounds, much like humans have been documented ACTUALLY hunting megafauna.

      Things humans do different are far smarter than walking slowly this way
      >Captive populations using artificially constructed barriers, captive breeding, and herding abilities most likely learned/borrowed from wolves (primitive husky-like dogs are used to herd reindeer)
      >Projectile weaponry
      >Traps
      >Cliff drives (herding behavior)
      Our instincts point towards scavenging
      >Insanely strong stomach acid can ingest rotting meat with minimal risk
      >STRONG aversion to bugs, possibly hinting at an instinct for picking the safest meat from a rotting corpse, when most other apes eat bugs
      >Innate desire to run towards flocks of birds - vulture hazing?

      Humans are actually bipedal border collies.

      typical ignorant rightoid that can only argue in strawmen.
      you do know that the vast majority of extinctions in the past 70 years have been because of humans? none of them have been "natural". species don't go extinct naturally in the wild over a human's lifetime

      A lot of species went extinct in less than a human's lifetime.

      It does not matter if some change in the world is natural or not. Does it benefit you or not? That is the question
      >Housefires are perfectly natural.
      >YOU'RE GOING TO BE homeless IDIOT.
      >Lots of housefires happened before and homes still exist
      >CALL 911
      >There is no proof I could have prevented this
      >YOU'RE ON FIRE TOO FRICK
      >Sam from across the river's house was on fire before. Aren't you friends with him? Go judge your own people.
      >ITS SPREADING TO OTHER HOUSES YOU FRICKING MORON
      >Worry about yourself, seriously. I bet you have a candle in your bedroom. Hypocrite.

      >a movie didn't depict thing with 100% accuracy? that must mean thing never happened!
      low IQ thought pattern

      All of the "evidence" for the thing is thought experiments and a movie puportedly showing the behavior still exists.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        humans don't like to face the reality that most of them are licking rocks and eating rotting garbage they couldn't catch if I throw them in the woods without larp tools. that's probably the subconscious reasoning behind the persistence hunting crap

  3. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It’s because it is, in fact, nature. Intervening would be disrupting a natural occurrence.
    >rahhh blah blah blah frick off dumb schizo
    I do not give a single flying frick about what you think of me or what I believe. Cry about it you b***h.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      You care enough to reply to an imaginary version of me

  4. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    it makes me mad especially considering how hard does humanity as a whole interfere with other species. even conservation societies actively helping animals do inevitably meddle with them.
    this draconian prime directive bullshit is just an excuse to have gore and violence on tape, to tearjerk the masses or appease the sichos that jack off watching a snake slowly suffocating a mouse.

  5. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >the lion needs to starve because he JUST DOES

  6. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >We can't intervene as the human species
    >Nature must take its course and it's beautiful when prey animals are ripped apart while alive
    >But we MUST stop these unviable evolutions from going extinct, ALL OF THEM, every dumb creature no matter how unfit to live!

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >and it's beautiful when prey animals are ripped apart while alive
      "we can't intervene" is fine but the people who think the next logical step is to watch that shit and smile scare me

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      typical ignorant rightoid that can only argue in strawmen.
      you do know that the vast majority of extinctions in the past 70 years have been because of humans? none of them have been "natural". species don't go extinct naturally in the wild over a human's lifetime

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >humans are unnatural

        big brain moment

  7. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Remnds me of that pic of a starving kid with vultures in the background. Cameraman didn't help.

  8. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    yes and no, if it's predator mauling some poor sob then don't intervening is good, when it's a herd of penguin trapped in a snow crater you frickers better help , we already influenced so much it doesn't matter if we intervene any more

  9. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    So now that we are at it, this was staged, right? There's no proof penguins abandone their peers and head right to the unknown.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >uhhh it's staged because...because it just is okay!?!?? documentarians LE BAD

  10. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    i only get mad if they dont help endangered species or dont mercy kill prey thats devoured from the ass up. like cmon. be humane.

  11. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'd watch a show where the crew stalk and kill poachers.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Suprising no one came up with a Poacher Punisher yet.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Doesn't the Phantom fight poachers?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Cheetahmen technically went up against their adoptive human dad which pretty much did this and more

  12. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >it is obvious that they just want a spectacle for the numbed masses.
    and?

  13. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >watch a video of a komodo dragon ripping open the abdomen of a deer, eat the baby inside, and then eat the intestinal tract, all while fully conscious
    >can't intervene bro, its unnatural!

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nature isn't kind.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        How would you interviene?

        I hope a komodo dragon eats you next

        Either shoot the deer, killing it, or kill the komodo

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Kill the komodo, useless murder machines they are

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            they are nature jannies

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >not just killing everyone involved

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      How would you interviene?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I hope a komodo dragon eats you next

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >summergay frogposter is a baiting fricking moron
      Who would have thought?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Baiting? Are you moronic? I added to the thread by giving another example of the absurdity of these "documentaries"

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/iq3PCzy.jpg

      [...]
      [...]
      Either shoot the deer, killing it, or kill the komodo

      Kill the komodo, useless murder machines they are

      Its a fricking deer lmao, its only purpose is to be food

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        i get to decide the purpose of both

  14. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I've only ever heard people saying the film makers provoked the walruses into falling but I never saw proof. Is there an analysis, a statement or such that breaks the incident down?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Helicopter got too close.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      They weren't necessarily provoked but the filmmakers did lie about "man-made climate change" causing the walruses deaths.
      https://polarbearscience.com/2019/04/14/our-planet-film-crew-is-still-lying-about-walrus-cliff-deaths-heres-how-we-know/

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I've only ever heard people saying the film makers provoked the walruses into falling but I never saw proof.

      Funny how that works right?

  15. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I remember watching a documentary on butterflies. One of them got stuck trying to get out of its cocoon and they couldn't help but interviene, all the while telling the viewer that they weren't supposed to do that

  16. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah frick that hawk. I personally want its chicks to starve to death too. Save the rodent it’s going to eat.

    Yeah frick that rodent. I personally want its litter to starve to death too. Save the spider it’s going to eat.

    Yeah frick that spider…

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >litter
      Do you ever find it strange that the word we use for an animal's offspring is the same word we use for trash on the ground?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Never. They may as well be different words to me.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >From Middle English lytere, litere, from Anglo-Norman litiere, from Late Latin lectuāria (“bedding”), from Latin lectus (“bed”). Compare French litière.
        >Had the sense of ‘bed’ in very early English, but then came to mean ‘portable couch’, ‘bedding’, ‘strewn rushes (for animals)’, etc.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Interesting.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            it basically means nesting, translates to that in my language
            nest=hay=mess=trash

  17. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't need a documentary I can just look out a window

  18. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's worse, they often provoke, injure, or kill animals, sometimes en masse, just to make a scene with a particular narrative. Take those walruses being driven off a cliff for example. Completely orchestrated.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Being passive is good, the predator may have tracked the creature for a month for all you know or starved up to that point, they need to eat too, the issue is when "documentarists" push, kill, endanger, or fabricate fights, that grinds my gears, It's very popular in insect ones to just shake up nests, make them fall over other colonies and just cause the fights and when one party flees to force It back in while also editing to make It look like a normal jump or mobility trick, despicable.

      Wasn't the walrus thing just the rock got flooded with walruses so they kept going up and when the bottom left the scene the top was stuck or bound to fall? Because I don't know if we are talking about the same incident

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        The one I'm remembering was the one where they claimed walruses were climbing because of overcrowding because of global warming (which might be the samd one) but what they actually did was provoke them into a stampede. Unless I'm mixing 2 separate instances in my memory.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I think we are on the same video due to their claim, that being said there was only few up in the one I remember and around only 3 fell on footage, I wouldn't be too surprised if they caused It...

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            If I recall there was a longer clip and a shorter one, but it has been a while. My recollection of the stampede and the lower explanation could be from a separate instance like I mentioned before. Not like they wouldn't do it multiple times if they would do it once.

            Yeah my dad works for the deep state and he says Sir David Attenborough PERSONALLY pushed those walruses up to the top of the cliff to force his "global warming" propaganda to force everyone to eat bugs and get covid boosters. Smh!

            They spooked them with a drone and by encroaching on their natural escape path, pushing them up the cliff.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >it was le drone

              Fake news by the israeli lamestream media, Attenborough himself pushed them over under orders from the globalist elites to bring about the NWO. Don't believe their lies!

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/MaU6VAz.jpg

                >IT WAS THE DRONE!
                >WE DON'T PAY ANYONE TO PUSH SEALS OFF OF CLIFFS!

                damn nat geo is based. imagine getting paid to kill endangered animals and then having the government cover it up for you. Sweet gig.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >IT WAS THE DRONE!
              >WE DON'T PAY ANYONE TO PUSH SEALS OFF OF CLIFFS!

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I once dumped a spider on a pile of ants to see what would happen

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's just documentaries under capitalism. Naturally, in order to keep food on the table and appease the masses, you're gonna have to compromsose, sensationalize and sometimes resorrt to shortcuts like this. Under socialism they'd be state-funded so you could take your sweet-ass time traveling with a crew and waiting for the right moment to film.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Under communism there would be no documentaries because the film maker was in the gulag.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah my dad works for the deep state and he says Sir David Attenborough PERSONALLY pushed those walruses up to the top of the cliff to force his "global warming" propaganda to force everyone to eat bugs and get covid boosters. Smh!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *