If you had a time machine, exactly how far back could you go before it was no longer ok to have sex with human ancestors

If you had a time machine, exactly how far back could you go before it was no longer ok to have sex with human ancestors

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    However far back I have to go to get a giant pongo gf.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Terry Harrison suggested a body mass of 200–300 kg (440–660 lb), though conceded this was likely an overestimate and it is impossible to obtain a reliable body mass estimate without more complete remains.[3]

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >G. blacki

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    50 years.
    Boomers might as well be a different species.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I want to have sex with horses in the current time so I am not a good person to ask this question.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >expressive eyes
    If I was an artist I would fix this. The artist is really good though.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Mutations rise and fall. There's no rhyme or reason to it. Some creatures degenerate a little or evolve too early.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        He's not showing very much whites compared to a human. OP pic is still wrong.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    late triassic

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm honestly curious on whether or not if Australopiths and early Hominin had tiny dick like modern great apes or not

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I imagine partner selection based on genital size didn't start happening until apes got comfy and decadent enough where some biggus dickus was mated with for fun. Or the smallus dickuses were discriminated against despite their resourcefulness which I find less likely.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      We didn't get big dicks until ancient Greece died.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    When you lose the ability to produce viable off spring is the answer you're looking for, maybe.

    I have no clue how far back that would be, but you could probably? Figure that out?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I have no clue how far back that would be
      somewhere around neanderthals or maybe denisovans

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        When you lose the ability to produce viable off spring is the answer you're looking for, maybe.

        I have no clue how far back that would be, but you could probably? Figure that out?

        last known common ancestor to humans and neanderthals was H. Erectus, if humans and neanderhals can produce viable offspring, could they with H. Erectus?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          unknown. It's possible humans can produce viable offspring with chimps.

          the fact that it's not being tried should tell you something about whether it's ok or not.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Isnt that how magic johnson(think ablut that name for a second) eventually got aids?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Other anon but I believe aids got spread to humans through bushmeat, became endemic due to urbanisation in Africa and then spread to some white tourist
              It exploded from there because gays didn't and still don't wear condoms

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I feel like thats the optimistic theory, it's equally likely someone fricked a monkey

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                HIV evolved at least 3 different times that we know of, and probably hundreds of times we don't know about, so there's a lot of possibilities.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I feel like thats the optimistic theory, it's equally likely someone fricked a monkey

                Other anon but I believe aids got spread to humans through bushmeat, became endemic due to urbanisation in Africa and then spread to some white tourist
                It exploded from there because gays didn't and still don't wear condoms

                It was made in a lab you goofballs.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Nah, pretty much most known cases of aids in animal populations are transmitted by fighting/violence. I think it's fair to say that someone fricking a monkey is the less likely scenario.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Also. Would you call them humanzee or chumpanman?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >The humanzee (sometimes chuman, manpanzee or chumanzee)

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                chuman is the best one

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Didn't both nazi germany and the soviet union try the chimp-human hybrid experiment and fail?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Yes because they used female humans who are not exactly set up for fecunditu. Human sperm on the other hand is actually insanely aggressive. It can even penetrate eggs of distantly related species, but it can’t fertilize them (at a noticeable rate).

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah that should be a fair proposition, species don't evolve towards bring more genetically compatible

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            unknown. It's possible humans can produce viable offspring with chimps.

            the fact that it's not being tried should tell you something about whether it's ok or not.

            they could. pic related. some groups of modern day African (it isn't ALL Africans like /misc/ likes to spout) can trace anywhere from I think 4% to 9% of their genes to an archaic homosexual species, with all signs pointing to it being a fairly "evolved" Erectus derivative, similar to how some European groups can trace significant neanderthal heritage. bear in mind Erectus likely wasn't as "basic" as the reconstructions make them out to be.IIRC they were at the very least capable of simple rafting.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Do you know where the frick you are?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'm not asking in a Wauf sense, but a general one

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Then ask on reddit.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Every living thing is on the table in Wauf.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The photo on the nightstand is the icing on the cake

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This scares me because a house cat can cut you with their hind legs even though they're dull.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Probably to the point of structured language development. That's what normies are always saying is required for consent even though it's a moronic notion.

        This scares me because a house cat can cut you with their hind legs even though they're dull.

        House cats are fricking schizos compared to most other cats. I'm sure she was a lot more careful.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Your mother

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *