If you had a time machine, exactly how far back could you go before it was no longer ok to have sex with human ancestors
If you had a time machine, exactly how far back could you go before it was no longer ok to have sex with human ancestors
If you had a time machine, exactly how far back could you go before it was no longer ok to have sex with human ancestors
However far back I have to go to get a giant pongo gf.
>Terry Harrison suggested a body mass of 200–300 kg (440–660 lb), though conceded this was likely an overestimate and it is impossible to obtain a reliable body mass estimate without more complete remains.[3]
>G. blacki
50 years.
Boomers might as well be a different species.
I want to have sex with horses in the current time so I am not a good person to ask this question.
>expressive eyes
If I was an artist I would fix this. The artist is really good though.
Mutations rise and fall. There's no rhyme or reason to it. Some creatures degenerate a little or evolve too early.
He's not showing very much whites compared to a human. OP pic is still wrong.
late triassic
I'm honestly curious on whether or not if Australopiths and early Hominin had tiny dick like modern great apes or not
I imagine partner selection based on genital size didn't start happening until apes got comfy and decadent enough where some biggus dickus was mated with for fun. Or the smallus dickuses were discriminated against despite their resourcefulness which I find less likely.
We didn't get big dicks until ancient Greece died.
When you lose the ability to produce viable off spring is the answer you're looking for, maybe.
I have no clue how far back that would be, but you could probably? Figure that out?
>I have no clue how far back that would be
somewhere around neanderthals or maybe denisovans
last known common ancestor to humans and neanderthals was H. Erectus, if humans and neanderhals can produce viable offspring, could they with H. Erectus?
unknown. It's possible humans can produce viable offspring with chimps.
the fact that it's not being tried should tell you something about whether it's ok or not.
Isnt that how magic johnson(think ablut that name for a second) eventually got aids?
Other anon but I believe aids got spread to humans through bushmeat, became endemic due to urbanisation in Africa and then spread to some white tourist
It exploded from there because gays didn't and still don't wear condoms
I feel like thats the optimistic theory, it's equally likely someone fucked a monkey
HIV evolved at least 3 different times that we know of, and probably hundreds of times we don't know about, so there's a lot of possibilities.
It was made in a lab you goofballs.
Nah, pretty much most known cases of aids in animal populations are transmitted by fighting/violence. I think it's fair to say that someone fucking a monkey is the less likely scenario.
Also. Would you call them humanzee or chumpanman?
>The humanzee (sometimes chuman, manpanzee or chumanzee)
chuman is the best one
Didn't both nazi germany and the soviet union try the chimp-human hybrid experiment and fail?
Yes because they used female humans who are not exactly set up for fecunditu. Human sperm on the other hand is actually insanely aggressive. It can even penetrate eggs of distantly related species, but it can’t fertilize them (at a noticeable rate).
Yeah that should be a fair proposition, species don't evolve towards bring more genetically compatible
they could. pic related. some groups of modern day African (it isn't ALL Africans like 4chan likes to spout) can trace anywhere from I think 4% to 9% of their genes to an archaic Homo species, with all signs pointing to it being a fairly "evolved" Erectus derivative, similar to how some European groups can trace significant neanderthal heritage. bear in mind Erectus likely wasn't as "basic" as the reconstructions make them out to be.IIRC they were at the very least capable of simple rafting.
Do you know where the fuck you are?
I'm not asking in a Wauf sense, but a general one
Then ask on reddit.
Every living thing is on the table in Wauf.
The photo on the nightstand is the icing on the cake
This scares me because a house cat can cut you with their hind legs even though they're dull.
Probably to the point of structured language development. That's what normies are always saying is required for consent even though it's a retarded notion.
House cats are fucking schizos compared to most other cats. I'm sure she was a lot more careful.
Your mother