Well if you're lucky enough, double-chan moe has a board dedicated to animal sexo. So maybe lurk there and if you're lucky enough, there might be a lizard/reptile/gator thread that will have your answers.
i miss when the loonies were right-wing
spending times in churches making harmless shit like this
now they're lefty
Working in college admin posts poisoning the youth spirit
Remember when being anti-vax used to be a left wing hippie thing with the crystals and free love and then turned into a right wing thing about bodily autonomy with the autism and freedom?
Birds at some point lost their penises (some have since evolved a psuedopenis, identifiable as a psuedopenis and not a real penis because it's made erect by being filled with lymph instead of blood. Crocodilians have regular penises. Therefore we can say that the loss of a penis is a derived character in archosaurs and not ancestral, and we can posit that the loss of the penis might be related to flight adaptation (bats are currently undergoing this loss in mammalia), which means we could expect penises to exist on almost all dinosaurs.
Assuming a crocodilian model for reproduction, even animals as large as Tyrannosaurus Rex should be able to mate without issue if the female adopts a head low stance and the male stands slightly behind her hips and turns his body so his belly is over her hips.
Gigantic sauropods and inflexible ankylosaurs are a more interesting problem, mechanically.
The serotine bat (Eptesicus serotinus), has already abandoned penetrative sex. This is the first step down the path to mating by urogenital orifice kissing.
the serotine bat has a megadong. Just because it doesn’t fit does not mean it will soon be reduced. Aerodynamics are not the only selective pressure they face. Could be that the females have a hard preference for males that perform a certain way and that any divergence from size and stamina would be maladaptive due to the female’s mate selection. It seems more likely to become an Irish elk bat that goes extinct from lugging around a colossal floppy dick.
>we can posit that the loss of the penis might be related to flight adaptation (bats are currently undergoing this loss in mammalia)
Does this mean pterosaurs also had no dicks?
Some people think that saurpods must have basically had ovipositors in order to not scramble their eggs when laying them, perhaps they stand side by side and the female's ovipositor slurps the male's spermal jelly out of his cloaca.
And if male saurpods had penises or psuedopenises, maybe they docked and the male penetrated the female ovipositor?
>Similarly to the red-billed buffalo weaver, the cassowary, a ratite, exhibits a pseudo-penis in both males and females. The male's pseudo-phallus is used to "inveganate", or to push the female's pseudo-phallus inside-out, and then ejaculates from the cloaca to ensure a successful mating.
????????
yeah
Did they get that close to the shore that often? Most seas are safe for humans even though sharks and orcas exist.
The bigger problem is that they'd need deep water to reproduce. That would be extremely limiting.
I can only imagine they had fricking insane serpentine prehensile pseudopenises and they just had to stand ass-to-ass while the cloacas did their work.
Actually, pliosaurs and plesiosaurs were part of the extinct superorder sauropterygia whereas sauropods were archosaurs which are fairly distantly related to any sauropterygians.
They did not, according to paleontologists they were trans and mutilated their genitalia, probably why they went extinct.
Is there any proof they didnt just touched each other asses like moonwalking on their backs and made a cloacal kiss?
Face to face.
Well if you're lucky enough, double-chan moe has a board dedicated to animal sexo. So maybe lurk there and if you're lucky enough, there might be a lizard/reptile/gator thread that will have your answers.
they fugg
They never mated. The female would lay eggs and the male would fertilize the eggs with his jizz.
Name one amniote that reproduces through external fertilization.
umm...anon, you do realize was making dumb joke, right?
They didn't and each female got impregnated by god
they won't teach you this stuff in school.
i miss when the loonies were right-wing
spending times in churches making harmless shit like this
now they're lefty
Working in college admin posts poisoning the youth spirit
Remember when being anti-vax used to be a left wing hippie thing with the crystals and free love and then turned into a right wing thing about bodily autonomy with the autism and freedom?
Border control and freedom of speech swapped teams too. I blame gay dinos, obviously.
Is it known for sure if dinosaurs had dicks? maybe they just rubbed cloacas
Pervert.
backwards probably
There's no evidence Dinosaurs had sex, so it must be assumed they didn't.
Birds at some point lost their penises (some have since evolved a psuedopenis, identifiable as a psuedopenis and not a real penis because it's made erect by being filled with lymph instead of blood. Crocodilians have regular penises. Therefore we can say that the loss of a penis is a derived character in archosaurs and not ancestral, and we can posit that the loss of the penis might be related to flight adaptation (bats are currently undergoing this loss in mammalia), which means we could expect penises to exist on almost all dinosaurs.
Assuming a crocodilian model for reproduction, even animals as large as Tyrannosaurus Rex should be able to mate without issue if the female adopts a head low stance and the male stands slightly behind her hips and turns his body so his belly is over her hips.
Gigantic sauropods and inflexible ankylosaurs are a more interesting problem, mechanically.
I bet they just had really, really, really long prehensile dicks.
>bats are currently undergoing this loss in mammalia
Lol no they're not.
The serotine bat (Eptesicus serotinus), has already abandoned penetrative sex. This is the first step down the path to mating by urogenital orifice kissing.
the serotine bat has a megadong. Just because it doesn’t fit does not mean it will soon be reduced. Aerodynamics are not the only selective pressure they face. Could be that the females have a hard preference for males that perform a certain way and that any divergence from size and stamina would be maladaptive due to the female’s mate selection. It seems more likely to become an Irish elk bat that goes extinct from lugging around a colossal floppy dick.
>we can posit that the loss of the penis might be related to flight adaptation (bats are currently undergoing this loss in mammalia)
Does this mean pterosaurs also had no dicks?
I'm more curious about the more ungainly giants like sauropods. It seems some people assume they always mated in water to avoid crushing each other.
Saved
saved
saved
Some people think that saurpods must have basically had ovipositors in order to not scramble their eggs when laying them, perhaps they stand side by side and the female's ovipositor slurps the male's spermal jelly out of his cloaca.
And if male saurpods had penises or psuedopenises, maybe they docked and the male penetrated the female ovipositor?
>Similarly to the red-billed buffalo weaver, the cassowary, a ratite, exhibits a pseudo-penis in both males and females. The male's pseudo-phallus is used to "inveganate", or to push the female's pseudo-phallus inside-out, and then ejaculates from the cloaca to ensure a successful mating.
????????
yeah
god i wish that was me
Which one?
you know
or a really long dick
SEX LAKES
E
X
LAKES
A
K
E
S
That would be super fine, it it weren't for the giant mosasaurs roaming the ocean at the time.
Did they get that close to the shore that often? Most seas are safe for humans even though sharks and orcas exist.
The bigger problem is that they'd need deep water to reproduce. That would be extremely limiting.
I can only imagine they had fricking insane serpentine prehensile pseudopenises and they just had to stand ass-to-ass while the cloacas did their work.
I fricking can't
I can't believe I got some good laughs today.
>it's another "wow, sauropods sure were huge, they must have been semi-aquatic" episode
we're known sauropods were transitional animals for quite some time
Actually, pliosaurs and plesiosaurs were part of the extinct superorder sauropterygia whereas sauropods were archosaurs which are fairly distantly related to any sauropterygians.