I have an unfalsifiable hypothesis that humans intrinsically worship carnivores like cats and wolves because of the transition we made from grazing fruit eaters to meat eating hunters. We view apes and monkeys as dumb and silly while viewing wolves and big cats as cool grace and beautiful because they represent the niche that were transitioning into while apes represent the niche were leaving. This also seeps into looks theory because good looking people and models usually have "cat" like features like hunter eyes and a square jaw while ugly people have ape like features like big round eyes and big round ears. This is also why women want to have sex with dogs
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Eating a lot of meat isn't healthy.
It's a short term trade off.
Mongols lived comparatively shorter lives compared to vegetarian Buddhist monks, who lived shorter lives than traditional chinese doctors.
So there is evidence that eating specific herbs and specific things (including wienerroaches, seahorses, sea cucumbers in traditional chinese medicine) is the healthiest path, followed by vegetarianism, follow by meat/milk.
Can you get your seahorse and wienerroach energy by eating the flesh of a Chinaman that regularly eats those? Asking for a friend
~~*Traditional chinese doctors*~~ lie about their age, by a lot. Buddhist monks just generally take care of themselves and live a clean and active life. You're zany. This is like saying that there's strong evidence being Catholic makes you healthier because Popes live longer than Cardinals who live longer than random muslims.
You're comparing the life expectancy of well educated and cloistered professions to warrior-nomads and saying "Must've been the meat."
Big carnivores are regal and majestic. Big herbivores are fricking terrifying. At least a lion will usually leave an adult human alone. Big herbivores get big enough to not give a frick. We're not even registered as anything but obstacle to them. Whoever domesticated the first cattle had to have balls of solid brass.
I don't know, I'm vegetarian but I'm attracted to big cats.
That mystery was solved a while ago.
And I wouldn't want it any other way.
Nah, it's cause they look and sound like money
Cattle are the most worshipped animal on the planet, and the list of other examples goes on and on. Predators were seen as rivals in most patriarchal civilizations.
>we we we we we we we we
"We" are not a bunch of paleolithic middle easterners. Those people are dead. We are measurably different. Significantly different.
To be fair I think OP is moronic is anyway
>we made from grazing fruit eaters to meat eating hunters
Except for the fact we were more opportunistic omnivores that went on to become nomads for a good deal of our history. Some of our earliest idols to gods resembled the animals we took on as nomads like cows and goats too, so we don't exactly worship or identify with carnivores either. The times we did were often polytheistic societys with herbivore, omnivore and carnivore deities. Our earliest and most heavily domesticated companion animals were omnivores too such as dogs which are far older than the far more carnivorous cats that self domesticated far later into human history.
In other words, your theory's foundation is rocky.
Dogs were not omnivores until ~10,000 years ago, and self-domesticated 10-30k years before that
But what does it matter, you have nothing in common with those long dead people. If you met them today, you would be two radically different races, even in total brain size and brain proportions.
>Dogs were not omnivores until ~10,000 years ago
wild wolves are omnivores now
>"But what does it matter, you have nothing in common with those long dead people. If you met them today, you would be two radically different races, even in total brain size and brain proportions"
>Did not understand the point of coherent foundations for theory hypothesis
Right. So you are moronic and can't comprehend basic logic structure. Figures
Canines are facultative carnivores and so are humans
humans are definitely not facultative carnivores.
We do not thrive on meat, meat isn't even a daily intake of our food unless you want to get health issues down the line.
So why can't humans process cellulose? And why we have a scavenger stomach and carnivore intestines.
The human intestine is not typical of carnivores, but it is for omnivores. Humans are not vegetarian but they are not majoritively meat eaters either. We have had these debates before in the vegan spam threads and they always end the same. Humans started out as herbivore, adapted to eat meat and then evolved to become omnivores today. If you look at the human diet with recorded history there has always been a predominantly omnivore bent to the vast majority of human cultures even without the currently accredited theories of human dietry development. Eat potato. Eat apple. Eat steak. Its not hard.
>Eat potato. Eat apple. Eat steak. Its not hard.
Sure. But eat mostly steak to be healthy.
>A groundbreaking 2021 study by Israeli researchers found that humans spent 2 million years as "hyper-carnivorous" apex predators that ate mostly the meat of large animals.
>Carnivores are shown to have a higher number of smaller fat cells, while omnivores have a smaller number of larger fat cells. Humans have many small fat cells like all carnivores. After comparing the fat cells in various types of animals, researchers found humans to be at the top of the carnivorous pattern, which suggests that the humans' energy metabolism is adapted to a diet in which lipids and proteins contribute most of the energy supply, rather than carbohydrates.
>Joo "researchers"
3/10 bait
Humans do not get issues from meat
Humans thrive on meat
>BT IF YOU WASH DOWN BACON WITH SUGAR!!!!
irrelevant. stop eating processed grains.
Over half the ancient human diet is meat.
> meat isn't even a daily intake of our food unless you want to get health issues down the line.
Maybe by fricked up modern dietary standards, but meat was absolutely a staple food in a number of different cultures, Mongolians for example rarely if ever ate plants because they regarded it as food for the animals and played a part in why they looked down on the Chinese, eating meat regularly will not cause issues
the cultures you are talking about have never actually adapted to the lifestyle of modern humans going into agriculture
Mongolians were primarily still nomads, they only lived off from the hunt.
No shit if they can handle eating meat daily when they have done it for thousands of years without ever adapting with the rest of us.
You however cannot simply do the same as we have adapted to a primarily omnivore style diet long ago, eating red meat daily for us would absolutely frick up our cardiovascular health down the line.
One major flaw in your reasoning. Big tough strong men have always been associated with big herbivores like bulls, rhinos, and horses. That cat and dog theory only works for twinks and chicks, so predatorgays really are just inferior according to you.
You need to learn female vs male gaze
Chicks call hot men studs, and you can google what that means if you don't get it already.
I guess body of the bull and face of the tiger is ideal
It is kinda crazy how overt that word is…