I can't post any photo with guinea pig without Peruvian commenting about their rat eating culture.
This is madness
Should I just become a catgay so I don't get bullied for liking herbivores.
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
....How do they taste?
This is coming from someone who does not like eating gourmet mushrooms ordinarily with my meals because of the texture and taste. They smell like ordinary gourmet mushrooms but that's about it. They do not really taste of anything. I have only eaten them fresh where they are a tiny bit bitter but not noticeable enough to affect you scoffing them down with some water. Cannot speak for dried though which is the more common way people tend to do it in order to preserve them for long term use. But usually when I hear people say they struggle to eat dried it is more to do with the fact that they are like crackers in how dry they are as apposed to taste. That's why you get some people who put them in tea or just grind them up into a powder with a coffee grinder and gulp it all down with a drink or even put them into capsules.
I have also known people make wine out of Fly Agaric mushrooms for psychedelic use. Pretty funky flavour apparently. Would not recommend it though as Fly Agaric is poisonous while other more common stuff like Cubensis is physically safe to consume in any quantity.
Bend down and formicate for our lord and conservator as he immolated himself for our soul crimes while T posing.
All formicate for the lord, ALL FORMICATE FOR THY LORD! THE OMNIPRESENT ANT EATER
>a dog eater tells me he eats dog
>i deck him and stomp his phone
>the IDF says i apprehended a terrorist and i get off free
might makes right. when will vegans learn?
Higher morals are an invalid concept for goyim anyways. Read your torah.
Dog cook, what recipes do you recommend?
3 parts fentanyl to one part vodka. drink and enjoy.
dog eaters are less evolved than pig eaters
pig eaters are less evolved than cow and chicken eaters
cow and chicken eaters are less evolved than people who eat meat grown like an unfeeling plant
the more like us, the more socially compatible with us, something is, the more it SHOULD trigger your sense of empathy just by imagining it being dead. FACTS. same reason normal people are disgusted by cannibals even if it's a motorcycle crash victim giving up an amputated limb willingly. you NEED instincts to stop "rational psychopaths" from becoming very principled serial killers like adolf hitler.
evolved = more intelligence, more empathy. human success is defined by higher levels of intelligence and empathy. this is not up for debate. anyone with less intelligence and less empathy is a parasitic mass on the species.
this is a fact. right now, you have no choice, you choose ill health and dietary fragility (switching from vegan to normal due to supply chain disruptions causes sickness, bad if you're already malnourished). you HAVE to eat some sort of animal protein.
it's really best to just stick to fish and humanely raised eggs and dairy from chickens and cows that are treated like pets, without any mother/calf separation or brutal chick culls. these are the closest thing we can get to growing meat on trees because no animals have to suffer.
Hitler did nothing wrong, kys disgusting israelite
>dairy from... cows that are treated like pets, without any mother/calf separation
How is getting forcibly impregnated over and over not considered a form of abuse? Even under absolute ideal circumstances where a dairy cow/goat/whatever isn't being locked into place, abused by dairy farmer workers, or getting separated from their calves (you'd have a population control issue eventually from this anyway), there is still the physical and very severe bodily harm from having to endure being pregnant and giving birth for their entire lives. It might just be more empathetic to just kill them.
You actual moron. You are aware cows breed whenever they can if you leave them alone, right? Not every farm is a factory farms. And you just said reproduction is torture, so, you are morally obligated to castrate yourself. Immediately.
Chickens do not have a self. I have chickens. They are lizard tier.
>You are aware cows breed whenever they can if you leave them alone, right?
Repeatedly, without breaks, for their whole lives? If you say so.
>And you just said reproduction is torture
Straw man
Yes. They breed every estrus cycle if they are able. Then they slow and stop in old age, but you have new cows.
Do you think the prehistoric fricks who drank milk had the modern dairy industry? Even cow worshiping indians can do dairy.
Consider me corrected, then.
But they don't look cute therefore not wrong if they suffer, I cannot have empathy for them. What matters is MY emotions and sense of disgust, not the animals.
Unironically because animals arent moral agents
God gave humans free will and self awareness and nothing else. They’re all P zombies but you can tell because they can not speak coherently or express belief in a higher power
>Using god to support an argument
In that case then, you are wrong because your god is fake, mine is real and says all living creatures were given a soul upon them.
>The god that backs the most successful civilizations is fake
Sure that’s why the entire middle east cant get rid of israel after trying a dozen times
>actually believes an invisible human like deity is behind the progress of human civilization and not the human brain and instinct of thriving.
Being so obsessed about IQ you should know that higher IQ is correlated with less religious beliefs.
>anglicans and israelites have higher IQs than atheists
im not so sure. in fact, the correlation between intelligence and religion is just a correlation between africans, hispanics, arabs, and religion. have a laugh at this article literally begging you to discard this fact.
>a-actually iq doesn't matter ;_; pls ignore that whites and israelites invent everything on their own and everyone else just follows the plot we wrote for them
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/andrewbrown/2008/dec/19/religion-iq-atheism
scientific racism is truth lol
Why would something like a god would exist?
And here’s one of those sub-anglican atheists now
Personally i subscribe to the idea that god is a giant wolf and therefore the only way to have a soul if you’re not canine is to hope to gain one by spending time around them, and all morality is judged by wolf standards. Source: DMT trip. My IQ was measured at 141. I day trade for a living, pulling $880,000 post tax yearly, and eat mostly bison, deer, and rabbit. Every spring i give myself fleas to be closer to god.
That's an inferior religion, I follow the omnipresent ant eater, it is the best one because I heard the voices in my head tell me which are product of his sacred tongue reaching within my mortal mind and implanting the divine knowledge. I have an IQ of 146 per Standford-Binet and got specially gifted in the visual-spatial test, soon will get my results form MENSA. Im the CEO of a bioengineering firm, specialized in crops. I wont really disclose my yearly earnings but are above 6 figures.
Every 48 h I must ingest 44 ants with their head removed according to the Biblioglossa
>Source: DMT trip. My IQ was measured at 141
Just wanted to say that if you had an IQ that high you would have had the sensibilities to at least do Cubensis or some other producer of Psilocybin, maybe LSA or even synthesised LSD. Even canines, the bearers of souls in your supposed spiritual belief, practice the consumption of mushrooms recreationally in the wild. DMT is for those who are just looking for a quick break from grounded reality in short and intense bursts. A distraction. A sideshow of intense visuals and audio. But it is as deep as a pond spiritually or introspectively. Your journey of revelation was the equivalent of a zoomer watching an iceberg video on obscure conspiracy theories and thinking they have come to some greater understanding compared to the average flesh golem.
>you werent high long enough!
kek religious validity is now based on shroom intake
Am I wrong though?
the problem is, you see, none of them suffer. nothing without abstract language is self aware. you idiots would talk yourselves into feeling bad for a robot if you didnt know humans made them.
the suffering of nonhumans has no bearing on my life except as far as it affects other humans
if it is creating a dangerous work environment for livestock management workers or making them more prone to crime then we must create a more peaceful way to acquire the meat we need to live. a beaten dog turns on man, you know, and so too does a man who beats dogs turn on his fellows. of course dogs are so close to us as other social carnivores that most people with functional empathy (aspies are not people) that even killing them bothers humans immensely.
Subhuman thinking
Bosintang
Ingredients
100 g of boiled dog meat
500 g of gravy
20 g of green onion
10 g of a leek
10 g of perilla leaves
100 g of taro stalk soaked in water
8 g of salt
2 g of mashed garlic
3 g of perilla
2 g of red pepper
2 g of mashed ginger
a little amount of pepper
After boiling the meat with gravy and stalk of taro for some time, boil again after putting vegetables and other ingredients into it.
Before eating, sprinkle pepper on it and put into an earthen bowl.
The stalk of taro is to be kept in cold water one or two days to get rid of its smell and taste.
I don't see how eating guinea pig is that much different than eating rabbit. Both are adorable herbivores that make cute pets. And both are, interestingly enough, sustainable meat sources that are easy to farm. Why the elites are promoting artifical meat and vegetarianism over just eating more small animals that breed like crazy is beyond me. Cephalopods also make good meat sources as they reproduce at high numbers.
if you have understanding you should know that cephalopods are highly intelligent, and knowing this alone should trigger some twinge of empathy inside you
calamari crunchers get the rope. they're either mild sociopaths or moronic.
If they are so intelligent why havent they invented nukes, I will keep eating them with zero guilt lmao
I'm aware. But I don't understand the cut off point for when an animal is too intelligent to eat. Pigs are also highly intelligent. Even unintelligent animals, like chickens, have a sense of awareness and empathy; I had pet chickens who used to follow me around and enjoyed sitting on my back.
>Why the elites are promoting artifical meat and vegetarianism over just eating more small animals that breed like crazy is beyond me
Probably because they are manageable independent livestock by the average person
The elite are genuinely for the lack of a better description pseudo-intellectual schizos that practice things like spirit cooking but unironically, they're LARPers that take themselves seriously. Eating the bugs isn't just about practicality (although it's very flawed when thoroughly examined) it's more a statement. They see us as subhuman goy cattle.
>nooooo why do people eat the cute chickens
>noooo muh heckin cows
>mongols and germans eat horses? nooooooo
op is a moron with domestication syndrome
>Should I just become a catgay
that's even worse
Im hungry, what I should eat?
The least cute
>Sharpening knives
>The bolt gun is ready, not doing that sadistic israeli method of cutting their neck until they die of exsanguination.
kill the one on the right and throw it in a river
eat the one on the left
Just bully them back then. Peruvians are the ugliest people in the planet, confirmed. I'd rather respawn in any shithole in Africa than in Peru.
it is not a coincidence that every culture that eats dogs is shit, and dog eaters are universally subhuman shitskins. just saying.
its like those people who say "logically, child sex is not bad, and children can be brought up to see their sexual experience as positive". morals aren't rational like that. they are rational in a greater context of things that are good for our species.
dog eating has a ripple effect of disease, poverty, and creating an environment that is simultaneously a joy to sociopaths and one that desensitizes people to the suffering of some of the animals that are most like people
>NOOO CUTENESS HAS NO MORAL RELEVANCE gays right now: ACKSHUALLY
cuteness has moral relevance. empathy is entirely based on audio visual cues, not "reason". you are a fricking animal. and i can read you people like dogs. a dog with some tendencies is a bad dog, and a human with some tendencies is a bad human. period.
every single culture that eats dogs is populated with nothing but subhuman shitskins
they are not people and they will never build great civilizations until that genetic trash is taken out
western civilization did in fact stumble upon more correct morals than anyone else (for a short period). that's why the entire world imitates us.
The "rational psychopath" has been a cancer of mankind forever
If there were an animal that looked and acted exactly like a human, but wasn't, the rational psychopath would consider it appropriate prey. It's the same mind defect that makes men able to act as soldiers in good conscience. They're meant to be slowly going extinct. The reason they're more common among lower IQ, unevolved populations like the han peasantry is because those people haven't experienced enough brutal warfare ala europe to kill off the idiots.
Dog meat butchers in germany did not make a great comeback after WW1 and WW2. Human and animal empathy are linked somewhat, and it's mostly about how human the animal appears, not "logic" which is the falsest god since joseph smith.
Its still culture and eating a dog is not morally wrong. Your rationale about cuteness is just appeal to disgust, because you see dogs as something more than any animal but I don't see them like that, I see them as for what they are, just another animal that can be used by man, be it as companion, guard, traction, or meat.
You cannot compare eating dogs to child abuse, one is simply rearing animals for the fulfillment of human desire and to some point nutrition, the other is taking advantage of a sexually and mentally undeveloped human, something that can traumatize and injure, just as plenty of psychiatric research has shown.
The reason why its popular on such countries is because they have another culture, in India cows are sacred and not eaten neither are dogs. You are just butthurt because I ate and wanna industrialize dog meat but is no different from eating any other non human animal except the attachment humans have to it. I bet you are fine eating fish yet plenty of edible fish has a diet with a high proportion of animal protein.
Cuteness does have moral value because empathy is an audio-visual experience and its based on cuteness.
Someone who tortures or kills dogs and cats is likely to grow up to be a criminal. Someone who smacks trout onto rocks and shoots deer - no correlation. Regardless of culture.
>its culture!
They have that culture because they are neurologically primitive.
You’re just a vegan butthurt that real morals arent based on autistic pseudo-religion.
How is talking about torturing dogs? i just want its meat, just like is done with all livestock species. Should be reared well and then slaughtered quick and with the least amount of suffering.
Im not vegan, Im an average person who tasted dog meat and liked it but that sees the hypocrisy meat eating industry. Vegans hate me.
>i am an esl turd worlder
>my iq is low and when people get hurt i dont feel anything
K.
Cuteness has moral value.
deer are cute though.
>dog eaters be like
>yes, rabies is still a problem in my country
>people who feed cows corn be like
>no, i am not giving it to africans.
different worlds tbh
>Different worlds
Both are America. The worst part is that they still get rabies and don't eat dogs.
There’s nothing wrong with respecting an animal for the meat it provides
Just banter back like it doesn’t bother you. Pet guinea pig varieties are all smaller and less meaty than the breeds meant for eating.
It’s like owning a bantam mini chicken breed, that isn’t good for anything except looking cute or poverty soup, and being upset that people eat a completely different breed that’s actually intended to be consumed.
Respect the food chain and being able to give Guinea pigs sanctuary
That's why Guinea pigs were domesticated in the first place.
>how do I cope with the fact that Westerners eat cows.
Lol
But they are cute pets
So what? Americans grind baby chicks alive to make nuggets.
Chick's grow up to be ugly chickens, guinea pigs are always cute
Dead baby chicks don't get to grow up, moron.
>we can't eat cute animals, waaa waaa
You're moronic and an hypocrite.
Would you cry if they ate your dogs
No
As someone who used to keep guinea pigs and has eaten them (pic.rel) I can say with confidence there is a distinct difference between a pet and livestock.
That which you keep as a pet should not be eaten but if you enjoy meat you're doing yourself a disservice by not trying it, they're actually really tasty,
>parsley and peppers
Serving it with what it wanted to eat most, damn
Peruvians don't go around eating other people's pets.
I would think of them as subhumans because dog meat is significantly less valuable than the food and time required to produce it. Either you use dogs for some function in life, like reducing the crime rate, or you don’t have them at all.
There’s a reason dog eaters are seen as unintelligent and chimp like. Even muslims already figured out this very basic cost:benefit analysis. Ten pounds of dog meat costs hundreds of pounds of other meat and the opportunity cost of the dogs inmediate or reserve working function. It’s similar to the reason why only idiots with homosexual erectus sized brains eat the dead and captured from warfare and actual humans prefer capture and enslavement or use for diplomatic bargaining. We are superior in ability and behavior.
that and having random dogs roaming around increases the mortality rate more than eating them decreases it. dog/cat eaters are idiots by every single standard. they are our direct competitors. the only options are cooperation and inmediate and absolute annihilation. if dog eaters were not glorified apes, they would not have dogs to eat.
If you raise dogs for meat consumption, sure, it's moronic. Raising carnivores for meat consumption is a moronic thing in general.
If you hunt them and use their meat I don't see a problem.
The problem is the only rational answer to uncontrolled dogs is complete extermination. Within a few years you shouldnt have any because they directly compete with you for much better food and spread disease. Because of parasite risks, they should be rendered into sterile protein meal for livestock feed rather than cooked as meat. Carnivores are parasite accumulators.
Having enough strays to justify hunting at this point in global development is a reliable indicator that the human population carries a genetic tendency towards low intelligence and inferior cooperative abilities. Using them as human food is for the kind of moron that still thinks diseases are invisible clouds of curses from dark spirits.
Culture is subject to natural selection.
in the west we render them into protein meal after a short period of allowing people to select ones worth keeping for any benefits. if there are too many to house they’re shot in bulk and rendered into livestock feed. call it giving back, because they’re the leading cause of livestock loss.
living with wild dogs is the same as living with wild human savages. we can not coexist unless they live by the same rules as the rest of us. they join or they die, because no one sane would continue to bear the losses.
we really do have the only civilization that’s somewhat developed aside from a small number of east asian and middle eastern countries.
Not really, that's just a flawed argument used by dog lovers to rationalize not eating dogs. While is true that sustaining humanity out of carnivores makes not much sense the breeding of dogs for meat isn't bad, there is plenty of left overs from the meat industry that can be feed to dogs and other carnivores that would be otherwise wasted, also the domestic dog is not an hypercarnivore, their digestive system evolved besides humans and then was further changed by selective breeding to tolerate an almost omnivore diet so that makes them a very versatile livestock regarding their food. The real issue is just cultural, I tasted dog two years ago when I had a trip to Tailand and its actually quite good when seasoned right. If you like goat or lamb you will like it, it tastes like lamb with chicken just stronger. I actually would support having a dog meat industry, why? because it tastes nice.
>there is leftovers
anything dogs can eat, we can eat. throwing away food results in famines. either dogs serve a purpose or they go extinct, even if that purpose is for social stability or is a relative luxury.
>their digestive system evolved alongside humans
therefore everything we can eat, so you're throwing away food working with a zoonoses factory because you like goat, which is not far off from dog in being something that's relatively stupid to eat and associated with less evolved hominids who haven't found better animals yet.
>it's cultural
culture is genetics. thailand is the child prostitution capital of the world. good people, right? the general human rights situation in thailand is similar to what the deep southern americans would prefer (not exactly the kind of people who wouldn't eat human flesh if jesus would let them) and the average IQ of thailand is 89-91, borderline moronic, and similar to what china would get if the CCP didn't put so much effort into faking statistics. they are medieval and only have civilization due to cultural colonization. would you imitate them? indonesia eats dogs, average IQ 79, vietnam, 90, it just goes on and on, find smart dog eaters and you just find corrupt psychopaths instead.
Its funny the more intelligent ruling class in south korea just banned dog meat and every single person protesting is the asian version a moronic rightoid. Poor, ugly, dumb, and old.
The majority of intelligent, upper class koreans despise the practice except for the dudebro, right winger types and lower class/rural uneducated morons. Figures. There is just a steady correlation between dog eating and being shitty people.
It's like no matter how well reasoned pedophilia is, it's ultimately just shitty people who have found a way to spread their shitty seed before women are old enough to realize how worthless they are. No matter how well reasoned dog eaters can make themselves sound, in the end, they have a little less of some basic human functions, like empathy, if they are able to do that to an animal that shares so many behaviors with us.
This also goes out to anyone that likes killing cats.
The only reason that's happening is because humans care too much about the opinions of others and so the western world being such lovers of pooches they don't want to be hated, is not because they are "intelligent and the elite" is because they need to follow what the western world does so they don't look bad and have economic effects regardless of how illogical or logical it could be.
>its not that they're intelligent and elite, it's that they're copying the people without whom koreans would still live in an iron age feudal society, and who provided the technological basis for all korean "creations" as well as the initial funding and market to make them lucrative
not the own you think it is
There we go, they have to do it not because its logical but because they have to do what their benefactors do. It still makes no difference, eating a dog is no different than eating any other animal except that westerners fell in love with them and so feel butt hurt of someone else eats them. If I have a farm were i give food and shelter to dogs just like is done with cows and pigs then go to slaughter and the meat is sold to other dog eaters how is that different other than the butthurt caused?
Talking about wasted resources feeding dogs is hypocritical, because there is plenty of excessive usage of resources simply to fulfill unnecessary human desires and that wont change, eating a few million dogs shouldn't do any serious difference when most people want to continue living their first world lifestyle. The majority of pollution comes form developed countries anyway (except China).
“Westerners” are just more empathetic and intelligent people with more creativity.
We are superior. The whole of civilization rests on the back of the west. You wouldn’t even have electricity without us lol.
Not really, the average IQ of most western countries is about 98-105 Many eastern Asian countries have higher IQs than the average westerner, for example Hong Kong has one of the highest averages IQs of the world.
Empathy and cuteness has a correlation however is not logical to give to such instincts. Large heads an eyes is the hallmark of cuteness because that's what a human child look like and that extends to some other species however its not logical to treat differently a species simple because it looks cute or not, that's actually a sign of low intelligence, not being able to override instinctive bias over logic.
You talk so much about IQ so I tell you my IQ is several points above 100 and so what? Why I know it well it is routine to be tested to get into college.
>asian countries have higher IQs
Of the ones that do, dog eating is mostly characteristic of the poor and stupid that don’t even get tested, and sociopathic behavior runs rampant through every social strata.
I wonder what former mass shooters think about eating dog?
Eating dog was widespread in Asia the IQ scores increased because their socioeconomic status increased as did nutrition and education but once again that does not has anything to do with eating dogs. Please tell me again how eating a dog reared in a farm is different from doing the same to a pig? Both are animals both are meat both get killed, but one upsets more people than the other simple because its "cute" have you seen a piglet? many would say they are cute yet they are slaughtered by the millions.
The master race of earth, the statistically most intelligent, and the only one to eclipse whites in scientific achievement bans pig meat. That’s also my people.
The highest IQ asians have the highest populations of vegans and vegetarians. How do averages work?
But its just statistics and the difference is at most 5 points. the bast majority of the western world has an IQ below 100 that's too much already, just a few percent of the population actually has the money to become vegetarian or vegan, funnily enough Indians have lots of vegetarians yet they are a shithole country.
>resisting your instincts is smart
lmao. the entire white world (so people) is slowly turning against meat itself and thinking of growing it in labs or with animals that cant suffer or elicit empathy. you are trying to justify a pointless waste that mostly appears to sociopaths and troglodytes. very smart.
And yet the majority don't care at all are and some even started a carnivore diet, like myself. Maybe the vegan is you?
The carnivore diet is a right wing thing and being right wing is an easy way to be more likely to be a violent criminal and fall behind your liberal peers by a full grade level. Interesting?
Any intelligent carnivore will want to, at least, put an end to all conscious prey, and empathy dictates to spare the cutest first and foremost. Intelligent and empathetic people are superior. Do you agree?
IF you can suppress empathy, whether you dont have much to begin with or not, that makes you a dangerous individual and in the long run the most fit behavior is to discourage this moral suppression and possibly remove you from the group.
Im empathetic, I don't want the doggos to suffer, they can be happy just before harvesting their meat. They shouldn't even know what happened. In fact i would argue Im more empathetic than you because I give the same value to all other animals, they should not suffer be it a cow or a dog. Good rearing and painless death is the goal.
>i am more empathetic because i kill all things equally
this is how sociopaths trying to approximate human behavior really act, lol.
it's about seeing the death, hearing the death, it's about seeing something dead, not measuring the nociception quotient of the death. the death is meant to elicit a bad feeling if it had more human traits before it died. ezpz. this stops you from killing things that are humans or work very well with humans even if you think it would make sense to.
>i dont understand. suffering is wrong. my victims did not suffer. i did nothing wrong. death is just part of life. if it is okay to kill a cow why is it wrong to poison a woman in her sleep? why does what i do to her corpse matter if no one finds out?
so you lack the gut feelings that empathy gives you. that's it. the reason we have real empathy, not the reasoned fake empathy of sociopaths, is because that gut feeling based on real things that are happening is required because otherwise a lot of very parasitic and selfish destructive behaviors become rationally moral.
just ask hitler. he thought like you, but unironically.
>if the israelites dont suffer before we kill them i think its for the best besides the net amount of suffering in the world will surely decrease
there are a lot of people in the US who came from africa, where dog eating is a matter of fact. that changes the average.
Do you eat meat?
>103 iq cretin cant follow a discussion worth shit
you lose.
You cannot answer? Do you eat meat or not? You talk about empathy and equal me to a sociopath because i wanna eat meat from a species you like then come with the bullshit justification that because dogs are cute (to you) then is akin me being a human killer. Same shit vegans say.
>Had the concept explained to him
>Is now a blubbering moron repeating himself
You couldn't refute the points so now you're just repeating yourself frantically, you, you, same person who thinks morality isn't an evolved trait based on some absurd definition of nature. you are a midwit too far up your own ass that your heads turned to shit.
You lose
And you don't answer the question that would undermine your arguments about caring and being empathetic for animals if the answer is affirmative. It would make you an hypocrite
>I eat meat but only animals that I don't find cute regardless if they have the same capacity to experience.
>attempting a loaded question using refuted principles
“Even though you just said there are animals that dont elicit enough empathy to make eating them an issue if you eat meat you have no empathy because I’m right”
That vegan diet rotted your brain.
>I eat meat but only animals that I don't find cute regardless if they have the same capacity to experience
>Ur stupid and will call you vegan coz you wanna eat the cute pooches
Im out, this becomes futile you are the one repeating himself and not addressing a simple question.
I dare you to go to a slaughter house kill and dress the animals you supposedly have no empathy for. Have you heard the horrible sounds pigs and cows make?
At first I was curious what you had to say as I went through your little discussion, but
>obsession with IQ
>you lose.
Wow, nice one you clown
You should really swap your estrogen pills for xanax lmao
>several points
>this guy has an IQ of 103 and thinks he's smart shit
Its pointless that I tell my actual IQ because you would think Im exaggerating it. But its still above 110 but below 130 closer to one of those numbers.
I just don't think you're saying anything in this thread that a 91 IQ goon couldn't also conclude
Exactly. Yet so many don't figure it out.
You could say that about many animals bred for food
Only pigs. Cows for instance can and should subsist entirely off inedible (for humans) materials. Feeding them anything we can derive significant value from is immoral.
>only idiots with homosexual erectus sized brains eat the dead and captured from warfare and actual humans prefer capture and enslavement or use for diplomatic bargaining.
stop insulting my rimworld playstyle okay food isn't always so easy to come by and i have no use for slaves or diplomacy with factions that will just drop relation points naturally anyway
No we don't. We only grind the males because they are useless for food.
But they look like pets, they don't look like livestock, they are cute and fluffy and are small
They look like a little pig under the fur. a literal livestock animal. Why the hell else would they be called guinea PIGS.
It’s recorded they were coined the “Guinea” pig after the currency, “dollar pig” as in cheap pig or little pig. They were bred for food but once whites found out about them they became pets too. Peru still eats them because they’re convenient and traditional.
They basically evolved to be eaten. They are genetically resigned to their fate as biomass reactors. Even the noble bison will kneecap their friends to get away and breed another day.
Maybe you should like an herbivore that evolved not to be eaten, like rhinos, hippos, or elephants. Elephants are some of the rare herbivores that deliberately attack hunters, showing a definite understanding of death, its significance, and how able they are to do something about it.
I mean herbivore that I can keep as pet
Elephants can be pets if you’re middle class and then move to africa where you will basically be a multi trillionaire.
Wait really? Hypothetically if someone earned 50000 dollars a year and went to india how loaded would they be in that economy?
Really rich. Assuming you can wfh for first world monies.