Cockers do have quite perverse personalities. I've had two of them and both were fucking weirdos. They are obsessive and basically autistic. One of them would be aggressive to some smaller dogs, but she wouldn't actually bite, just a bit of snarling.
Even with all the shit breeding and the culture of abuse among german shepherds and rotweilers
Even with everyone and their mother calling wolfdogs huskies and pro mushers breeding aggressive dogs just because they run faster
Even with mastiffs being idealized man killers, like the big cat version of a dog
No one can top the lethality of bull type terriers
wolfdogs aren’t actually that dangerous compared to dogs that were bred to fight every animal chavs could get their hands on. they’re very communicative and you know what they want to do 5 minutes before they do it. a game pitbull would fucking destroy a wolfdog in a dogfight.
the debate in this thread reminds me of collie epilepsy. they dont know what genes cause it, but its less common in collie mutts, so the only ways to get rid of it are ending entire bloodlines and breeding mutts. srs bisns collie breeders dont want to give up any instinctive herding talent at all so champion trials/workinng dogs are very inbred and suffer from seizures and weird disorders like collie collapse disorder. the inbreeding of collies resulted in nearly 4 genetic diseases being named for the breed group. it would be 4 but calling multidrug resistance “collie chemical intolerance” was considered too insensitive. mutts that dont herd at a championship level but still get the job done have no such problems. they also look a bit more like heelers and spitzes than the purebred collerinos.
My lil fren is a coward tho.
He will often bark at other people however if they come close he will run away.
Firmly believe its a shitbull owner trying to psyop people
I work in a dog rescue where we get hundreds of cockers every year, they're prone to bed guarding and being food aggressive, more than most other breeds we get in. We don't have pitbulls in this country tho so I can't compare them
Chihuahuas are by far the most viscous of all breeds. I believe chihuahuas are the second most common breed often found in shelters in the US (pitbulls being #1, naturally).
Lots of breeds are more aggressive than pit bulls >inb4 someone post FATAL attacks
Pit bulls are definitely the most dangerous because once they decide to kill something they don't stop but they're not the most likely to attack.
>actually thinking this
A pit bull would tear through your radial artery with one bite and then you'd bleed out. I know anatomy is hard but a pit bull has 4 easy spots to bite on your body that will be immediately lethal to you even if you're a bodybuilder.
Pits only have such a high death count because of two reasons.
They're VERY popular fighting dogs, because of their endurance, strength and intelligence they're the go to dog for anyone with a brain. Because of this they're raised to be violent.
The other reason is because of their high needs mixed with fighting capabilities.
They're high energy dogs that need to be trained and socialised like any dog, the only difference is a well bred Pit will kill anyone who fucks around to find out.
Terriers were bred to hunt. Because of this they'll naturally want to hunt, like a cat chasing birds. Pits are Terriers, a strong fighting breed mixed with a breed that actively hunts things smaller than it doesn't go well together.G48RJ
Collies are dog aggressive (for a fucking reason. GET THE FUCK AWAY FROM THE SHEEP!) but they’re terrible fighters that are barely good enough to even wound a dog. They mostly just serve to frighten since they come from scotland where most marauding dogs are other collies, german/nordic shepherds and spitzes, and similarly friendly dogs that really just pose a danger to sheep.
Pitbulls were bred not to show any aggression until they attack with the intent to kill. Most dogs are bred to show aggression but stop short of killing. Would you rather your dog be snarled and snapped at for fucking around on balto’s lawn or would you rather mr. pibble placidly stare at your dog and then go for their throat like a dog seeking missile?
>Pitbulls were bred not to show any aggression until they attack with the intent to kill.
Where the fuck did you hear this? No. They are however very fearful and they will attack "unprovoked" if you scare them. They don't snarl because they cower.
yeah you cant trust shitbulls. one moment they’re happy, the next moment the toddler across the room is missing their neck. “Not aggressive according to temperament tests” my ass.
You shouldn't let any dog get close to toddlers.
Everything about toddlers screams "prey item"
1 year ago
Anonymous
Only if they have literally never see one before. All dogs MUST be brought up with children. This is why they’re considered family pets.
1 year ago
Anonymous
And yet while the socialized husky leaves toddlers alone a pitbull carefully raised still attacks children. Because huskies just have prey drive, and pitbulls are not just predatory but also aggressive. They would be no good at being pitbulls if they weren’t.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>while the socialized husky leaves toddlers alone
You can never be sure. See
[...]
1 year ago
Anonymous
>All dogs MUST be brought up with children
Nice try Fido, but I'm not that stupid
1 year ago
Anonymous
Yes you raise them from puppies with toddlers. Dogs that still bite children or anyone despite that get their skulls caved in the night of, and if you’re clever, you start prodding at their offspring. This is how we maintained domestication for the past 20,000+ years.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>This is how we maintained domestication for the past 20,000+ years
No, we did it by keeping dogs in a pen and training them outside, keeping toddlers well beyond their reach.
Mistaking dogs for humans is a very modern phenomenon. It's not a person, it's not a "nanny dog", it's a carnivorous predator.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Yes anon, we have VIOLENTLY destroyed aggressive dogs for centuries. Without exception. We did not rehabilitate or work around their flaws. We fucking killed them. For huskies specifically, the chuchki tribe had them sleep with and spend time around children for protection and warmth. The unwavering policy of killing every single aggressive dog without hesitation or exception is why huskies today have no issues with meeting strangers. Bad breeding by westerners who wanted nothing but a faster sled is why some of them are a little more like wolves than any siberian would ever allow. Huskies are not even the only breed that was expected to be able to live peacefully indoors. The angloid and roman way of keeping violent dogs outdoors is modern, and ancient religions ie: judaism, pre New Testament, have commandments against the keeping of any dog that bites people.
Dogs go indoors. Dogs live among people. Dangerous ones die. Fido does not get kept in a kennel or on a chain, because if he has to be it’s a temporary arrangement before someone can sharpen their axe. This arrangement is why you had nice dogs to breed into monsters and guard dogs to begin with.
1 year ago
Anonymous
dogs are not allowed to be dangerous apex predators. any dog that bites any person should be put down and its progeny evaluated for potential execution.
dogs are not allowed to hunt anything larger than a rabbit or a skunk. stop breeding dangerous animals.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Lmao no dogs were indoor outdoor animals to begin with. We have archaeological and historical evidence of them living in the same structures as people. Maybe a guard dog, but those are explicitly dangerous, but most dogs are not and were never meant to be risky to handle. The most they were allowed was causing minor wounds to retaliate for harassment and trespassing and hunting kids was always automatic euthanasia not a shrug and a “well my doggo is a predator what do you expect”. IE: a greyhound should be able to sit in front of a preschool and not attack anyone. Ironically you’re the biggest heckinpupper furbabygay here. >haha doggos just being doggos 🙂
pitbull violence is very predictable. they are extremely easy to get into an excite hunt state and react very often to universal excitation stimuli that turn dogs into bark & bite machines who don't notice falling off a cliff there's a deer cornered on it.
people are retarded and don't understand how dog excitement works.
>ooh this huskie is so cute he wouldn't harm a thing >pibbles are so cuddly there's no way they'd bite anyone
how can you own a pet and don't know the very basics of their instincts is beyond me.
>husky is so cute he wouldn't harm a thing >result: husky chases down a cat and kills it. the owner is mad but it's just a cat, big deal, they signed its death warrant when they let it outside. >pibbles are socuddly there's no way they'd bite anyone >result: pibbles kills a 7 year old girl. a human life was lost. a mother lost her daughter. a man's bloodline was just cut in half.
1 year ago
Anonymous
females aren't human
1 year ago
Anonymous
Typical pitbull apologist
>pitcels
1 year ago
Anonymous
you think a husky's instinct wouldn't be triggered near the defenseless small mammal known as "baby"?
1 year ago
Anonymous
No because my husky would never even hurt a fly.
1 year ago
Anonymous
That’s ridiculously rare and has only been documented with abused, woman owned dogs and dubious mutts. Pitbulls kill over thirty people a year
1 year ago
Anonymous
I accept your concession.
1 year ago
Anonymous
not much of a concession when despite being under 10% of the population pitbulls are responsible for 70% of human fatalities
but i guess some old lady had 10 wolfdogs in her doublewide so huskies are bad too. oh and cocker spaniels are actually more aggressive because they growl before they snap at you, unlike pitbulls that are angels and just wait until they have an excuse to rip your bicep off. lmfao.
1 year ago
Anonymous
I don't care about pits, stop your whataboutism.
Huskies are small animal predators by excellence. They are a problem if left alone with.
Most large dogs have triggers. It's fucking dog nature to have them.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Pitbulls triggers are pretty much everything and their typical targets for predatory drive and common aggression are also pretty much everything. Huskies doing infants is rare and a major fault rather than expected behavior that has been purposefully bred for. The ruskis that made those dogs would club them to death out back if one even came close to biting a child. Cant say the same about the wolf GSD hound mixes americans use to win the iditarod.
1 year ago
Anonymous
i'm just going to assume a pitbull cucked you because you be this rent free about them
1 year ago
Anonymous
I'm going to assume that a pitbull is currently cucking you which is why you're simping for them.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Cant say the same about the wolf GSD hound mixes americans use to win the iditarod.
I'm having trouble seeing GSDs contributing to HUSKOIDS. what's the rationale here? what do the contribute? frame wise GSDs are fucked for the most part. mechanically, their morphometrics just are not great for this kind of running. you have to really look for a healthy dog here. it's not a problem for a family dog but you can't use any of the to make olympian tier athletes. so where do these GSDs come from? who makes them?
1 year ago
Anonymous
Alaskan race dogs have historical german shepherd admixture and are often mixed with belgian shepherds as well as malamutes, wolves, and greyhounds. They are to “huskies” as dogfighting creatures are to “pitbulls”.
And that is only one landrace dog type, just one Wauf readily understands because pitshills like to say “no huskies are worse” while claiming that “those werent real pitbulls”. Hence the husky situation is good for pointing out their stupidity.
1 year ago
Anonymous
that's a different thing though innit? hell, your generic Golden Retriever probably has significant GSD admixture "historically". but I understood your comment as iditarod fgts actively x-breeding GSDs into their line TODAY with a specific purpose in mind. which I find sus. say you are one of those cunts who has a lot of HUSKOIDs outside, chained to a post living in an old drum barrel and one lonely wolf wanders by one day. clearly, that wolf is showing some sort of higher than normal agreeableness (maybe it's sick though so that's why). you could then try to let the wolf "by accident" mate one of your dogs... I can see that happening and I can see the rationale and thinking behind that. even a sickly wolf can probably contribute significantly to your line epecially if it's an old female that can't run any more and you do not really plan of keeping around much longer anyway. such experiments may be worth trying...
1 year ago
Anonymous
God i wish i was that wolf
1 year ago
Anonymous
>how can that be true if my misconceptions are true?
simple answer: you're wrong and retarded and reality proves it.
1 year ago
Anonymous
you could have explained yourself instead of insulting me. meh.
1 year ago
Anonymous
If you don't understand innately what's wrong with your reasoning, not amount of me explaining it will help.
but words are free so I'll give it a try
just because some GSD's have structural problems does not imply that most or all do. Nor does it imply that those problems will necessarily be inherited, nor that breeders will keep any dogs that inherit problems.
you've oversimplified and stereotyped both the breed and breeding in general. You should be able to see this naturally, but you cannot or prefer not to.
1 year ago
Anonymous
for example, if you take a GSD with bad hips and breed it to a husky with good hips, you won't get a husky with bad hips. You'll get a husky with the strength and endurance and size of the GSD but the good hips of the husky.
this isn't some magical property of breeding. It's just that the problems with purebreds come from pure breeding. Start crossing them and those problems go away fast.
also you vastly overestimate the prevalence of morphological problems in GSD's because you think their posture is a good indicator of problems. Which of course is false.
1 year ago
Anonymous
A portion of the litter would have bad hips and entirely random base temperaments, ie: dominant huskies that distrust strangers but aren’t very aggressive and GSDs that trust strangers but are still aggressive and dominant
1 year ago
Anonymous
>A portion of the litter would have bad hips and entirely random base temperaments,
false.
again, if you were right then sled dog breeders wouldn't use them.
also you fail at understanding genetics. The defects come from dozens of loci, perhaps hundreds. Removing any single locus removes the problem. So any outcrossing automatically deletes the defect.
1 year ago
Anonymous
or to reverse it-
if bad hips came from a single gene AND that gene was dominant, then you'd perhaps be right.
neither is true.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>You'll get a husky with the strength and endurance and size of the GSD but the good hips of the husky.
lmao total brainlet.
>how can you own a pet and don't know the very basics of their instincts is beyond me.
I was recently in an argument with some retard who insisted that his dog enjoyed being hugged and held. He said, and I quote, 'he only growls like that because he's a husky and they're just noisy!!!'
I dont understand how people can be that stupid. I don't.
1 year ago
Anonymous
My dog likes being held and hugged but she’s had a lot of good experiences where at some point i had my arms around her
I've owned Pits for all my life, all of which fell into two categories.
Absolute bitches who will only bite when you REALLY push them.
And the Guards, these guys will fuck your shit up as soon as you enter the property, they'll bark and growl, once you step foot on they're territory THEY WILL KILL YOU.
Cockers do have quite perverse personalities. I've had two of them and both were fucking weirdos. They are obsessive and basically autistic. One of them would be aggressive to some smaller dogs, but she wouldn't actually bite, just a bit of snarling.
Can confirm. Not a relative that wasn't bitten and then stiched by our demon.
Even with all the shit breeding and the culture of abuse among german shepherds and rotweilers
Even with everyone and their mother calling wolfdogs huskies and pro mushers breeding aggressive dogs just because they run faster
Even with mastiffs being idealized man killers, like the big cat version of a dog
No one can top the lethality of bull type terriers
Why?
over 2 centuries of purposefully breeding them to be as deadly as possible.
wolfdogs aren’t actually that dangerous compared to dogs that were bred to fight every animal chavs could get their hands on. they’re very communicative and you know what they want to do 5 minutes before they do it. a game pitbull would fucking destroy a wolfdog in a dogfight.
Even if it's true, cocker spaniels don't have the strength to do any serious damage.
everybody loves watermelon though
you didn't need to be racist all of a sudden
>everybody loves watermelon
Yes but it's different with Black folks
the debate in this thread reminds me of collie epilepsy. they dont know what genes cause it, but its less common in collie mutts, so the only ways to get rid of it are ending entire bloodlines and breeding mutts. srs bisns collie breeders dont want to give up any instinctive herding talent at all so champion trials/workinng dogs are very inbred and suffer from seizures and weird disorders like collie collapse disorder. the inbreeding of collies resulted in nearly 4 genetic diseases being named for the breed group. it would be 4 but calling multidrug resistance “collie chemical intolerance” was considered too insensitive. mutts that dont herd at a championship level but still get the job done have no such problems. they also look a bit more like heelers and spitzes than the purebred collerinos.
Probably because heelers are the best herding dogs bar none and herding spitzes are a good source of genes for good health and weather resistant coats
My lil fren is a coward tho.
He will often bark at other people however if they come close he will run away.
Firmly believe its a shitbull owner trying to psyop people
Snapshot got unbanned.
I work in a dog rescue where we get hundreds of cockers every year, they're prone to bed guarding and being food aggressive, more than most other breeds we get in. We don't have pitbulls in this country tho so I can't compare them
Ok, sure. Do they kill more than pit bulls?
I've never seen a cocker attack in the news. Almost seems like bullshit.
Has a chihuahua-pitbull crossing ever been tried?
probably be too viscous
>Chihuahuas
no but i've personally attested to daschund pibbles
Chihuahuas are by far the most viscous of all breeds. I believe chihuahuas are the second most common breed often found in shelters in the US (pitbulls being #1, naturally).
>Chihuahuas are by far the most viscous of all breeds.
runny little dogs
I don’t know about “runny” but they snap and bite with the best of them. An all-chihuahua dog fighting ring would be a sight to behold I tell you.
looks quite viscous
I've never heard of this in my life.
Yes but the pibble memelords aren't gonna want to hear that
>Mfw the pibble memelordsade me decide to adopt a pit for my next dog kek
Lol, no. Maybe chihuahuas and dachhunds, but not cocker spaniels.
Lots of breeds are more aggressive than pit bulls
>inb4 someone post FATAL attacks
Pit bulls are definitely the most dangerous because once they decide to kill something they don't stop but they're not the most likely to attack.
Pit bulls are only dangerous to small children elderly people dumb white girls and out of shape manlets. Look at the age demos for the fatal attacks.
>actually thinking this
A pit bull would tear through your radial artery with one bite and then you'd bleed out. I know anatomy is hard but a pit bull has 4 easy spots to bite on your body that will be immediately lethal to you even if you're a bodybuilder.
They're medium sized dogs you shutin
Pits only have such a high death count because of two reasons.
They're VERY popular fighting dogs, because of their endurance, strength and intelligence they're the go to dog for anyone with a brain. Because of this they're raised to be violent.
The other reason is because of their high needs mixed with fighting capabilities.
They're high energy dogs that need to be trained and socialised like any dog, the only difference is a well bred Pit will kill anyone who fucks around to find out.
Fuck around and find out! Please have a nice day, swiftly
yeah, by coping pitt owners I bet lmao
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rage_syndrome
Basically some are bipolar
today I learned something new.
Does it related to terrier breeds being temperamental little shits in general?
No, cockers are retrievers and spainels.
Terriers aren't bipolar, they just have bad temperament.
>Bad temperament
Aggression and prey drive on crack is a bad temperament? Because it's great for killing everything that moves.
Terriers were bred to hunt. Because of this they'll naturally want to hunt, like a cat chasing birds. Pits are Terriers, a strong fighting breed mixed with a breed that actively hunts things smaller than it doesn't go well together.G48RJ
I've only encountered two agressive dogs in my life and both of them were border collies
Collies are dog aggressive (for a fucking reason. GET THE FUCK AWAY FROM THE SHEEP!) but they’re terrible fighters that are barely good enough to even wound a dog. They mostly just serve to frighten since they come from scotland where most marauding dogs are other collies, german/nordic shepherds and spitzes, and similarly friendly dogs that really just pose a danger to sheep.
Pitbulls were bred not to show any aggression until they attack with the intent to kill. Most dogs are bred to show aggression but stop short of killing. Would you rather your dog be snarled and snapped at for fucking around on balto’s lawn or would you rather mr. pibble placidly stare at your dog and then go for their throat like a dog seeking missile?
>Pitbulls were bred not to show any aggression until they attack with the intent to kill.
Where the fuck did you hear this? No. They are however very fearful and they will attack "unprovoked" if you scare them. They don't snarl because they cower.
No they are every single kind of aggressive and are so with little warning
yeah you cant trust shitbulls. one moment they’re happy, the next moment the toddler across the room is missing their neck. “Not aggressive according to temperament tests” my ass.
You shouldn't let any dog get close to toddlers.
Everything about toddlers screams "prey item"
Only if they have literally never see one before. All dogs MUST be brought up with children. This is why they’re considered family pets.
And yet while the socialized husky leaves toddlers alone a pitbull carefully raised still attacks children. Because huskies just have prey drive, and pitbulls are not just predatory but also aggressive. They would be no good at being pitbulls if they weren’t.
>while the socialized husky leaves toddlers alone
You can never be sure. See
>All dogs MUST be brought up with children
Nice try Fido, but I'm not that stupid
Yes you raise them from puppies with toddlers. Dogs that still bite children or anyone despite that get their skulls caved in the night of, and if you’re clever, you start prodding at their offspring. This is how we maintained domestication for the past 20,000+ years.
>This is how we maintained domestication for the past 20,000+ years
No, we did it by keeping dogs in a pen and training them outside, keeping toddlers well beyond their reach.
Mistaking dogs for humans is a very modern phenomenon. It's not a person, it's not a "nanny dog", it's a carnivorous predator.
Yes anon, we have VIOLENTLY destroyed aggressive dogs for centuries. Without exception. We did not rehabilitate or work around their flaws. We fucking killed them. For huskies specifically, the chuchki tribe had them sleep with and spend time around children for protection and warmth. The unwavering policy of killing every single aggressive dog without hesitation or exception is why huskies today have no issues with meeting strangers. Bad breeding by westerners who wanted nothing but a faster sled is why some of them are a little more like wolves than any siberian would ever allow. Huskies are not even the only breed that was expected to be able to live peacefully indoors. The angloid and roman way of keeping violent dogs outdoors is modern, and ancient religions ie: judaism, pre New Testament, have commandments against the keeping of any dog that bites people.
Dogs go indoors. Dogs live among people. Dangerous ones die. Fido does not get kept in a kennel or on a chain, because if he has to be it’s a temporary arrangement before someone can sharpen their axe. This arrangement is why you had nice dogs to breed into monsters and guard dogs to begin with.
dogs are not allowed to be dangerous apex predators. any dog that bites any person should be put down and its progeny evaluated for potential execution.
dogs are not allowed to hunt anything larger than a rabbit or a skunk. stop breeding dangerous animals.
Lmao no dogs were indoor outdoor animals to begin with. We have archaeological and historical evidence of them living in the same structures as people. Maybe a guard dog, but those are explicitly dangerous, but most dogs are not and were never meant to be risky to handle. The most they were allowed was causing minor wounds to retaliate for harassment and trespassing and hunting kids was always automatic euthanasia not a shrug and a “well my doggo is a predator what do you expect”. IE: a greyhound should be able to sit in front of a preschool and not attack anyone. Ironically you’re the biggest heckinpupper furbabygay here.
>haha doggos just being doggos 🙂
pitbull violence is very predictable. they are extremely easy to get into an excite hunt state and react very often to universal excitation stimuli that turn dogs into bark & bite machines who don't notice falling off a cliff there's a deer cornered on it.
people are retarded and don't understand how dog excitement works.
>ooh this huskie is so cute he wouldn't harm a thing
>pibbles are so cuddly there's no way they'd bite anyone
how can you own a pet and don't know the very basics of their instincts is beyond me.
>husky is so cute he wouldn't harm a thing
>result: husky chases down a cat and kills it. the owner is mad but it's just a cat, big deal, they signed its death warrant when they let it outside.
>pibbles are socuddly there's no way they'd bite anyone
>result: pibbles kills a 7 year old girl. a human life was lost. a mother lost her daughter. a man's bloodline was just cut in half.
females aren't human
Typical pitbull apologist
>pitcels
you think a husky's instinct wouldn't be triggered near the defenseless small mammal known as "baby"?
No because my husky would never even hurt a fly.
That’s ridiculously rare and has only been documented with abused, woman owned dogs and dubious mutts. Pitbulls kill over thirty people a year
I accept your concession.
not much of a concession when despite being under 10% of the population pitbulls are responsible for 70% of human fatalities
but i guess some old lady had 10 wolfdogs in her doublewide so huskies are bad too. oh and cocker spaniels are actually more aggressive because they growl before they snap at you, unlike pitbulls that are angels and just wait until they have an excuse to rip your bicep off. lmfao.
I don't care about pits, stop your whataboutism.
Huskies are small animal predators by excellence. They are a problem if left alone with.
Most large dogs have triggers. It's fucking dog nature to have them.
Pitbulls triggers are pretty much everything and their typical targets for predatory drive and common aggression are also pretty much everything. Huskies doing infants is rare and a major fault rather than expected behavior that has been purposefully bred for. The ruskis that made those dogs would club them to death out back if one even came close to biting a child. Cant say the same about the wolf GSD hound mixes americans use to win the iditarod.
i'm just going to assume a pitbull cucked you because you be this rent free about them
I'm going to assume that a pitbull is currently cucking you which is why you're simping for them.
>Cant say the same about the wolf GSD hound mixes americans use to win the iditarod.
I'm having trouble seeing GSDs contributing to HUSKOIDS. what's the rationale here? what do the contribute? frame wise GSDs are fucked for the most part. mechanically, their morphometrics just are not great for this kind of running. you have to really look for a healthy dog here. it's not a problem for a family dog but you can't use any of the to make olympian tier athletes. so where do these GSDs come from? who makes them?
Alaskan race dogs have historical german shepherd admixture and are often mixed with belgian shepherds as well as malamutes, wolves, and greyhounds. They are to “huskies” as dogfighting creatures are to “pitbulls”.
And that is only one landrace dog type, just one Wauf readily understands because pitshills like to say “no huskies are worse” while claiming that “those werent real pitbulls”. Hence the husky situation is good for pointing out their stupidity.
that's a different thing though innit? hell, your generic Golden Retriever probably has significant GSD admixture "historically". but I understood your comment as iditarod fgts actively x-breeding GSDs into their line TODAY with a specific purpose in mind. which I find sus. say you are one of those cunts who has a lot of HUSKOIDs outside, chained to a post living in an old drum barrel and one lonely wolf wanders by one day. clearly, that wolf is showing some sort of higher than normal agreeableness (maybe it's sick though so that's why). you could then try to let the wolf "by accident" mate one of your dogs... I can see that happening and I can see the rationale and thinking behind that. even a sickly wolf can probably contribute significantly to your line epecially if it's an old female that can't run any more and you do not really plan of keeping around much longer anyway. such experiments may be worth trying...
God i wish i was that wolf
>how can that be true if my misconceptions are true?
simple answer: you're wrong and retarded and reality proves it.
you could have explained yourself instead of insulting me. meh.
If you don't understand innately what's wrong with your reasoning, not amount of me explaining it will help.
but words are free so I'll give it a try
just because some GSD's have structural problems does not imply that most or all do. Nor does it imply that those problems will necessarily be inherited, nor that breeders will keep any dogs that inherit problems.
you've oversimplified and stereotyped both the breed and breeding in general. You should be able to see this naturally, but you cannot or prefer not to.
for example, if you take a GSD with bad hips and breed it to a husky with good hips, you won't get a husky with bad hips. You'll get a husky with the strength and endurance and size of the GSD but the good hips of the husky.
this isn't some magical property of breeding. It's just that the problems with purebreds come from pure breeding. Start crossing them and those problems go away fast.
also you vastly overestimate the prevalence of morphological problems in GSD's because you think their posture is a good indicator of problems. Which of course is false.
A portion of the litter would have bad hips and entirely random base temperaments, ie: dominant huskies that distrust strangers but aren’t very aggressive and GSDs that trust strangers but are still aggressive and dominant
>A portion of the litter would have bad hips and entirely random base temperaments,
false.
again, if you were right then sled dog breeders wouldn't use them.
also you fail at understanding genetics. The defects come from dozens of loci, perhaps hundreds. Removing any single locus removes the problem. So any outcrossing automatically deletes the defect.
or to reverse it-
if bad hips came from a single gene AND that gene was dominant, then you'd perhaps be right.
neither is true.
>You'll get a husky with the strength and endurance and size of the GSD but the good hips of the husky.
lmao total brainlet.
Oh it's the huskyschizo
kys
>how can you own a pet and don't know the very basics of their instincts is beyond me.
I was recently in an argument with some retard who insisted that his dog enjoyed being hugged and held. He said, and I quote, 'he only growls like that because he's a husky and they're just noisy!!!'
I dont understand how people can be that stupid. I don't.
My dog likes being held and hugged but she’s had a lot of good experiences where at some point i had my arms around her
I've owned Pits for all my life, all of which fell into two categories.
Absolute bitches who will only bite when you REALLY push them.
And the Guards, these guys will fuck your shit up as soon as you enter the property, they'll bark and growl, once you step foot on they're territory THEY WILL KILL YOU.
>Collies
>Herding and Droving
>Livestock Guardian???
Pick one.
Collies are bred for their hunting drive which makes them chase sheep, they aren't guardian dogs