>cocker spaniels are more aggressive than pitbulls I've heard this many times.

>wienerer spaniels are more aggressive than pitbulls
I've heard this many times.

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    wienerers do have quite perverse personalities. I've had two of them and both were fricking weirdos. They are obsessive and basically autistic. One of them would be aggressive to some smaller dogs, but she wouldn't actually bite, just a bit of snarling.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Can confirm. Not a relative that wasn't bitten and then stiched by our demon.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Even with all the shit breeding and the culture of abuse among german shepherds and rotweilers
      Even with everyone and their mother calling wolfdogs huskies and pro mushers breeding aggressive dogs just because they run faster
      Even with mastiffs being idealized man killers, like the big cat version of a dog
      No one can top the lethality of bull type terriers

      Why?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        over 2 centuries of purposefully breeding them to be as deadly as possible.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        wolfdogs aren’t actually that dangerous compared to dogs that were bred to fight every animal chavs could get their hands on. they’re very communicative and you know what they want to do 5 minutes before they do it. a game pitbull would fricking destroy a wolfdog in a dogfight.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Even if it's true, wienerer spaniels don't have the strength to do any serious damage.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    everybody loves watermelon though
    you didn't need to be racist all of a sudden

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >everybody loves watermelon
      Yes but it's different with Black folks

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the debate in this thread reminds me of collie epilepsy. they dont know what genes cause it, but its less common in collie mutts, so the only ways to get rid of it are ending entire bloodlines and breeding mutts. srs bisns collie breeders dont want to give up any instinctive herding talent at all so champion trials/workinng dogs are very inbred and suffer from seizures and weird disorders like collie collapse disorder. the inbreeding of collies resulted in nearly 4 genetic diseases being named for the breed group. it would be 4 but calling multidrug resistance “collie chemical intolerance” was considered too insensitive. mutts that dont herd at a championship level but still get the job done have no such problems. they also look a bit more like heelers and spitzes than the purebred collerinos.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Probably because heelers are the best herding dogs bar none and herding spitzes are a good source of genes for good health and weather resistant coats

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    My lil fren is a coward tho.
    He will often bark at other people however if they come close he will run away.
    Firmly believe its a shitbull owner trying to psyop people

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Snapshot got unbanned.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I work in a dog rescue where we get hundreds of wienerers every year, they're prone to bed guarding and being food aggressive, more than most other breeds we get in. We don't have pitbulls in this country tho so I can't compare them

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ok, sure. Do they kill more than pit bulls?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I've never seen a wienerer attack in the news. Almost seems like bullshit.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Has a chihuahua-pitbull crossing ever been tried?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      probably be too viscous

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Chihuahuas
      no but i've personally attested to daschund pibbles

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Chihuahuas are by far the most viscous of all breeds. I believe chihuahuas are the second most common breed often found in shelters in the US (pitbulls being #1, naturally).

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Chihuahuas are by far the most viscous of all breeds.
      runny little dogs

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I don’t know about “runny” but they snap and bite with the best of them. An all-chihuahua dog fighting ring would be a sight to behold I tell you.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          looks quite viscous

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I've never heard of this in my life.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Yes but the pibble memelords aren't gonna want to hear that

    >Mfw the pibble memelordsade me decide to adopt a pit for my next dog kek

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Lol, no. Maybe chihuahuas and dachhunds, but not wienerer spaniels.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Lots of breeds are more aggressive than pit bulls
    >inb4 someone post FATAL attacks
    Pit bulls are definitely the most dangerous because once they decide to kill something they don't stop but they're not the most likely to attack.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Pit bulls are only dangerous to small children elderly people dumb white girls and out of shape manlets. Look at the age demos for the fatal attacks.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >actually thinking this
        A pit bull would tear through your radial artery with one bite and then you'd bleed out. I know anatomy is hard but a pit bull has 4 easy spots to bite on your body that will be immediately lethal to you even if you're a bodybuilder.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          They're medium sized dogs you shutin

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Pits only have such a high death count because of two reasons.

      They're VERY popular fighting dogs, because of their endurance, strength and intelligence they're the go to dog for anyone with a brain. Because of this they're raised to be violent.

      The other reason is because of their high needs mixed with fighting capabilities.

      They're high energy dogs that need to be trained and socialised like any dog, the only difference is a well bred Pit will kill anyone who fricks around to find out.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Frick around and find out! Please have a nice day, swiftly

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    yeah, by coping pitt owners I bet lmao

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rage_syndrome

    Basically some are bipolar

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      today I learned something new.

      Does it related to terrier breeds being temperamental little shits in general?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        No, wienerers are retrievers and spainels.
        Terriers aren't bipolar, they just have bad temperament.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Bad temperament
          Aggression and prey drive on crack is a bad temperament? Because it's great for killing everything that moves.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Terriers were bred to hunt. Because of this they'll naturally want to hunt, like a cat chasing birds. Pits are Terriers, a strong fighting breed mixed with a breed that actively hunts things smaller than it doesn't go well together.G48RJ

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I've only encountered two agressive dogs in my life and both of them were border collies

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Collies are dog aggressive (for a fricking reason. GET THE FRICK AWAY FROM THE SHEEP!) but they’re terrible fighters that are barely good enough to even wound a dog. They mostly just serve to frighten since they come from scotland where most marauding dogs are other collies, german/nordic shepherds and spitzes, and similarly friendly dogs that really just pose a danger to sheep.

      Lots of breeds are more aggressive than pit bulls
      >inb4 someone post FATAL attacks
      Pit bulls are definitely the most dangerous because once they decide to kill something they don't stop but they're not the most likely to attack.

      Pitbulls were bred not to show any aggression until they attack with the intent to kill. Most dogs are bred to show aggression but stop short of killing. Would you rather your dog be snarled and snapped at for fricking around on balto’s lawn or would you rather mr. pibble placidly stare at your dog and then go for their throat like a dog seeking missile?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Pitbulls were bred not to show any aggression until they attack with the intent to kill.
        Where the frick did you hear this? No. They are however very fearful and they will attack "unprovoked" if you scare them. They don't snarl because they cower.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          No they are every single kind of aggressive and are so with little warning

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            yeah you cant trust shitbulls. one moment they’re happy, the next moment the toddler across the room is missing their neck. “Not aggressive according to temperament tests” my ass.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              You shouldn't let any dog get close to toddlers.
              Everything about toddlers screams "prey item"

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Only if they have literally never see one before. All dogs MUST be brought up with children. This is why they’re considered family pets.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                And yet while the socialized husky leaves toddlers alone a pitbull carefully raised still attacks children. Because huskies just have prey drive, and pitbulls are not just predatory but also aggressive. They would be no good at being pitbulls if they weren’t.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >while the socialized husky leaves toddlers alone
                You can never be sure. See

                [...]

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >All dogs MUST be brought up with children
                Nice try Fido, but I'm not that stupid

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Yes you raise them from puppies with toddlers. Dogs that still bite children or anyone despite that get their skulls caved in the night of, and if you’re clever, you start prodding at their offspring. This is how we maintained domestication for the past 20,000+ years.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >This is how we maintained domestication for the past 20,000+ years
                No, we did it by keeping dogs in a pen and training them outside, keeping toddlers well beyond their reach.
                Mistaking dogs for humans is a very modern phenomenon. It's not a person, it's not a "nanny dog", it's a carnivorous predator.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Yes anon, we have VIOLENTLY destroyed aggressive dogs for centuries. Without exception. We did not rehabilitate or work around their flaws. We fricking killed them. For huskies specifically, the chuchki tribe had them sleep with and spend time around children for protection and warmth. The unwavering policy of killing every single aggressive dog without hesitation or exception is why huskies today have no issues with meeting strangers. Bad breeding by westerners who wanted nothing but a faster sled is why some of them are a little more like wolves than any siberian would ever allow. Huskies are not even the only breed that was expected to be able to live peacefully indoors. The angloid and roman way of keeping violent dogs outdoors is modern, and ancient religions ie: judaism, pre New Testament, have commandments against the keeping of any dog that bites people.

                Dogs go indoors. Dogs live among people. Dangerous ones die. Fido does not get kept in a kennel or on a chain, because if he has to be it’s a temporary arrangement before someone can sharpen their axe. This arrangement is why you had nice dogs to breed into monsters and guard dogs to begin with.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                dogs are not allowed to be dangerous apex predators. any dog that bites any person should be put down and its progeny evaluated for potential execution.

                dogs are not allowed to hunt anything larger than a rabbit or a skunk. stop breeding dangerous animals.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Lmao no dogs were indoor outdoor animals to begin with. We have archaeological and historical evidence of them living in the same structures as people. Maybe a guard dog, but those are explicitly dangerous, but most dogs are not and were never meant to be risky to handle. The most they were allowed was causing minor wounds to retaliate for harassment and trespassing and hunting kids was always automatic euthanasia not a shrug and a “well my doggo is a predator what do you expect”. IE: a greyhound should be able to sit in front of a preschool and not attack anyone. Ironically you’re the biggest heckinpupper furbabyhomosexual here.
                >haha doggos just being doggos 🙂

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            pitbull violence is very predictable. they are extremely easy to get into an excite hunt state and react very often to universal excitation stimuli that turn dogs into bark & bite machines who don't notice falling off a cliff there's a deer cornered on it.

            people are moronic and don't understand how dog excitement works.

            >ooh this huskie is so cute he wouldn't harm a thing
            >pibbles are so cuddly there's no way they'd bite anyone

            how can you own a pet and don't know the very basics of their instincts is beyond me.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >husky is so cute he wouldn't harm a thing
              >result: husky chases down a cat and kills it. the owner is mad but it's just a cat, big deal, they signed its death warrant when they let it outside.
              >pibbles are socuddly there's no way they'd bite anyone
              >result: pibbles kills a 7 year old girl. a human life was lost. a mother lost her daughter. a man's bloodline was just cut in half.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                females aren't human

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Typical pitbull apologist

                >pitcels

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                you think a husky's instinct wouldn't be triggered near the defenseless small mammal known as "baby"?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                No because my husky would never even hurt a fly.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                That’s ridiculously rare and has only been documented with abused, woman owned dogs and dubious mutts. Pitbulls kill over thirty people a year

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I accept your concession.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                not much of a concession when despite being under 10% of the population pitbulls are responsible for 70% of human fatalities

                but i guess some old lady had 10 wolfdogs in her doublewide so huskies are bad too. oh and wienerer spaniels are actually more aggressive because they growl before they snap at you, unlike pitbulls that are angels and just wait until they have an excuse to rip your bicep off. lmfao.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I don't care about pits, stop your whataboutism.

                Huskies are small animal predators by excellence. They are a problem if left alone with.

                Most large dogs have triggers. It's fricking dog nature to have them.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Pitbulls triggers are pretty much everything and their typical targets for predatory drive and common aggression are also pretty much everything. Huskies doing infants is rare and a major fault rather than expected behavior that has been purposefully bred for. The ruskis that made those dogs would club them to death out back if one even came close to biting a child. Cant say the same about the wolf GSD hound mixes americans use to win the iditarod.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                i'm just going to assume a pitbull cucked you because you be this rent free about them

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I'm going to assume that a pitbull is currently cucking you which is why you're simping for them.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Cant say the same about the wolf GSD hound mixes americans use to win the iditarod.

                I'm having trouble seeing GSDs contributing to HUSKOIDS. what's the rationale here? what do the contribute? frame wise GSDs are fricked for the most part. mechanically, their morphometrics just are not great for this kind of running. you have to really look for a healthy dog here. it's not a problem for a family dog but you can't use any of the to make olympian tier athletes. so where do these GSDs come from? who makes them?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Alaskan race dogs have historical german shepherd admixture and are often mixed with belgian shepherds as well as malamutes, wolves, and greyhounds. They are to “huskies” as dogfighting creatures are to “pitbulls”.

                And that is only one landrace dog type, just one Wauf readily understands because pitshills like to say “no huskies are worse” while claiming that “those werent real pitbulls”. Hence the husky situation is good for pointing out their stupidity.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                that's a different thing though innit? hell, your generic Golden Retriever probably has significant GSD admixture "historically". but I understood your comment as iditarod fgts actively x-breeding GSDs into their line TODAY with a specific purpose in mind. which I find sus. say you are one of those c**ts who has a lot of HUSKOIDs outside, chained to a post living in an old drum barrel and one lonely wolf wanders by one day. clearly, that wolf is showing some sort of higher than normal agreeableness (maybe it's sick though so that's why). you could then try to let the wolf "by accident" mate one of your dogs... I can see that happening and I can see the rationale and thinking behind that. even a sickly wolf can probably contribute significantly to your line epecially if it's an old female that can't run any more and you do not really plan of keeping around much longer anyway. such experiments may be worth trying...

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                God i wish i was that wolf

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >how can that be true if my misconceptions are true?
                simple answer: you're wrong and moronic and reality proves it.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                you could have explained yourself instead of insulting me. meh.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                If you don't understand innately what's wrong with your reasoning, not amount of me explaining it will help.

                but words are free so I'll give it a try

                just because some GSD's have structural problems does not imply that most or all do. Nor does it imply that those problems will necessarily be inherited, nor that breeders will keep any dogs that inherit problems.

                you've oversimplified and stereotyped both the breed and breeding in general. You should be able to see this naturally, but you cannot or prefer not to.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                for example, if you take a GSD with bad hips and breed it to a husky with good hips, you won't get a husky with bad hips. You'll get a husky with the strength and endurance and size of the GSD but the good hips of the husky.

                this isn't some magical property of breeding. It's just that the problems with purebreds come from pure breeding. Start crossing them and those problems go away fast.

                also you vastly overestimate the prevalence of morphological problems in GSD's because you think their posture is a good indicator of problems. Which of course is false.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                A portion of the litter would have bad hips and entirely random base temperaments, ie: dominant huskies that distrust strangers but aren’t very aggressive and GSDs that trust strangers but are still aggressive and dominant

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >A portion of the litter would have bad hips and entirely random base temperaments,
                false.

                again, if you were right then sled dog breeders wouldn't use them.

                also you fail at understanding genetics. The defects come from dozens of loci, perhaps hundreds. Removing any single locus removes the problem. So any outcrossing automatically deletes the defect.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                or to reverse it-

                if bad hips came from a single gene AND that gene was dominant, then you'd perhaps be right.

                neither is true.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >You'll get a husky with the strength and endurance and size of the GSD but the good hips of the husky.
                lmao total brainlet.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Oh it's the huskyschizo
                kys

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >how can you own a pet and don't know the very basics of their instincts is beyond me.
              I was recently in an argument with some moron who insisted that his dog enjoyed being hugged and held. He said, and I quote, 'he only growls like that because he's a husky and they're just noisy!!!'
              I dont understand how people can be that stupid. I don't.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                My dog likes being held and hugged but she’s had a lot of good experiences where at some point i had my arms around her

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I've owned Pits for all my life, all of which fell into two categories.

          Absolute b***hes who will only bite when you REALLY push them.

          And the Guards, these guys will frick your shit up as soon as you enter the property, they'll bark and growl, once you step foot on they're territory THEY WILL KILL YOU.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Collies
        >Herding and Droving
        >Livestock Guardian???
        Pick one.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Collies are bred for their hunting drive which makes them chase sheep, they aren't guardian dogs

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *