>Chinese village girl posted her outdoor cat killing a bird.
Gets death threats for letting her cats roam and uploads an apology video. Intelligent debates about outdoor cats in rural environments and how best to approach animal protection in comments.
>Youtube video of cat killing baby birds.
"Awesome!" "My cat's also like this haha"
How did the tables turn like this? Are we the real bugs? How do we educate the West about outdoor cats?
Fuck birds, they’re annoying and shit on everything. They’re the last remains of dinosaurs and cats are doing a good thing by helping to finish what the meteor started.
chinkoids are still traumatized about the sparrow genocide incident
I find it funny how eating them is used as a justification for killing animals but when you eat humans it's considered worse than just killing them
it's a nonsensical lie told by humans specifically because they are delicious, and other humans are one of the few animals capable of eating human regularly. we wage large scale war that no other animal can and every single time a society breaks the taboo and finds out people are delicious, instead of just killing their enemies they capture and eat them, and start waging war just to get more delicious buttocks.
>humans: humans can't taste good because nothing eats them.
>humans: *kills everything that eats them*
>humans: see? we taste horrible.
This, except for cannibals who knew it's a risk but ate humans anyway because it's just that delicious
where do your cats even get those exotic protected birds, here the only ones that exist in cities are pigeons, sparrows, crows and martins
>catgays just lose their marbles and prove what they’re accused of
What are they trying to prove?
Feels so good when my cats slaughter a bird. It's a good meal for them and it makes you birdcucks seethe.
All this 4chan shit and the only "biology/ecology" being discussed is which animals have more soul and some anon trying to reinvent the wheel theorising about well-understood cat behaviours because he has zero knowledge to draw on. Shamefur dispray.
Wauf is one of the stupidest boards.
The non-philosophical generals like /plant/ are the only ones where people have any semblance of an education. Heck even /kot/ and the rodent gens have some knowledgeable people who can give sound advice. Any non-general thread is a complete shitshow.
I don't care about any animal that isn't a cat or a dog.
England's Parliament have official cats to hunt mice, Ottawa Canada used to have an outdoor cat colony before Animal Welfare reasons had them adopt all the cats out and use other means of pest control instead. The cats in Ottawa used to have an outdoor cat house shaped like people houses but having them outside during winter was considered cruel even though there are always ferals...let's take away something locals and tourists enjoy!
That’s cute. I would have liked to see it.
The cats don’t enjoy being roadkill for a non-reduction in rodents.
i never enjoyed that filthy waste of public funds
Cat Colonies should be illegal because it brings nothing but misery. The food attracts other vermin like roaches and rats which the cats will do nothing about. Cat Colonies are also a breeding ground of disease which the cats will spread to humans. Cat Colonies are shit.
While we're on the topic:
Say your cat does kill a bird; the deed is done, there's no point mulling over it etc etc. What do you think the moral way to go about it from there? Do you immediately scoop the poor thing up and dispose of it, or do you let little moronman chow down so at least it was given purpose in death, to feed a hungry kitty?
Throwing it away is just wasteful. Let your cat eat it, then euthanize your cat before it kills another bird.
No, the cat is based. Birds are vermin and the less of those soulless sky lizards we have around the better.
>soulless sky lizards
You're just making them seem even cooler than they already are
>Birds are vermin
>cat sniffs now dead bird
>smacks it a few more times
>walks away bored
What makes you think the cat will eat it?
What makes you think there was any reason behind the killing?
He was literally munching on it when I caught him, that's why
>Cats don't hunt rats
That means they don't but they do
Did they delete their comment out of shame of being stupid?
I remember reading a satirical story of a man who caught or brought a big fish, and he brought seasoning to cook the fish, and the cat stole his fish -- when bystanders pointed this out he was in no hurry, the cat will come back because it had forgot the seasoning! But cats are portrayed as fish thieves in the city.
...but I think there are more positive stories and perception of cats when one is a farmer.
Oh, Chinese also hangs up fish to dry it, so cats would be another nuisance that would steal that, and it's unnerving how cats can get over walls (while dogs can't).
Is it possible to teach a cat to stay away from birds by spraying it with water when you find it with a dead bird, maybe take the dead bird and use it as practice, put dead bird with cat, every time cat goes near the bird, you spray it, it will understand that bird is not punishment free food.
>Is it possible to teach a cat to stay away from birds by spraying it with water
No it is not you dumbass. Hunting is deeply ingrained in cat biology, same and nail sharpening. They won't understand or link your punishment with their natural action, they'll just become fearful of humans and also stressed which will cause more problems. You can train out unnatural behaviours like if they keep opening the fridge door but for natural behaviours you have to find ways to mitigate it like exercising them and tiring them out.
Stop spreading misinformation.
They do hunt rats, but it's not their preferred prey
This rat is bigger than the kitty's head, didn't save it:
Do chinese eat dogs alive or is that a rumor
Yep. Dogs are treated worse than shit in China. if you have guts google boiling water husky china
Figures. They remind them of people and have no consequences attached.
Read about the guanxi massacre (note: this term is blocked or leads to an alternate narrative in china. the real one is where they killed and ate their political enemies.)
It's not just dog but animals in general. It's just that chinese love the taste of dog.
Whenever you are reading Ancient Chinese war records, on supplies, when they start talking about 兩腿羊 (two legged goats)...
No, as far as I know people cook their food first -- dogs are boiled alive, there is an awful webm of it. Donkeys or monkeys are also live harvested meat piece by piece to cook to keep it fresth.
Shrimps are eaten alive after being soaked in alcohol. Drunken Shrimp
>How did the tables turn like this? Are we the real bugs? How do we educate the West about outdoor cats?
It's because birds are traditionally kept as pets more than cats were in China. There are romantic folklores of people becoming songbirds but not one of them becoming cats. Cats are seen as nuisance for killing birds and stealing fish from the market, and probably koi ponds too.
I know Ukraine love cats the way Egypt does because cats hunt rats that eats grain -- I guess it's different in most of China because the economy has diversified so that many peasants weren't farmers any longer -- and when found, the rats are eaten too, so no need for the cat...
China also had indoor plumbing and remote garbage sites literally thousands of years before the west so rat-enabled pandemics weren't a thing.
>China also had indoor plumbing
>peasants had indoor plumbing
lies, like the romans, only the wealthy could afford these things
and like many things it was invented in india before mesopotamia built one stone hut
>I guess it's different in most of China because the economy has diversified so that many peasants weren't farmers any longer -- and when found, the rats are eaten too, so no need for the cat...
Ill informed. Tabby cats (Li hua mao) in China are descended from the Eurasia mountain cat but were never domesticated to be pets, they were kept around warehouses that stored grains/onions (lots of grains since China is not a hunter-gather society but an agrarian one) and also book warehouses because mice also ate book. They're generally viewed as independent working animals rather than companions.
The bird thing is because the bird was a protected species and a conservation channel realised what the cat was killing from her video and called her out on it.
The chinese know well what happens when you wipe out birds
It's American culture. The country built by criminals, outlaws, slaves and good-for-nothings. Western culture is sociopathic in nature.
Europe was built by warlords, china was built by cannibals and rapists, and japan is the europe of asia. It’s funny tbh.
Predators worship predators.
Prey worships prey.
>even chinks understand cats are the morons of the animal kingdom
well thats funny
What is with you people and black people? Do they live rent free in your tiny heads?
You can’t. The west has basically abandoned morality and discipline. It’s why so many old people are just stuffed in the nursing homes and forgotten about by their children
>har har, stupid EVIL western dog. you only hate some animar, but i hate arr animar. i better than you har har har
sometimes its clear someone is a different species
A ching chong and a bing bong to you too chang.
Hiro really needs to ban all murican IPs already
this but europoors too
and maybe all non japanese asians
idk i think korea and singaporeans can stay, they're not too bad
Go cat go! I live watching videos like this! Where do I get MORE.
>the goal of the universe is to be rid of life.
>suns expand to consume the habitable zone
>everything moving further apart to dissuade escape
the universe fucking hates life
>it's a timed mission that you can't restart
Fuck, I hate when games do this.
Wow bro so deep... i wonder is your asshole can compare
what a good fucking post
Because dogs were bred to be socially compatible with humans, and wolves were to begin with but aren’t able to bond with humans past 7 days of age and naturally fear them, they can be used as a proxy to see how a person would treat another person if they were the last two on earth and social consequences did not exist.
A chinese man enslaves and eats them. They are just resources.
A korean man oppresses them and isnt opposed to eating them either. He wants order and food.
The Japanese abide by them now but only need one excuse to torture them for fun again. They like order and showing and receiving respect but nothing else.
And the white american boomer says he likes them, but in his actions he is violent and hateful to them. They only exist to sate his ego and serve him performing menial tasks. If they are ever truly free he considers their freedom a moment of rebellion that ridicules him.
And all of them will gladly kill a wolf, a person they can’t have a connection with, if it has the slightest chance if being inconvenient. The eagerness with which they do shows in their foreign policy.
>And all of them will gladly kill a wolf, a person they can’t have a connection with, if it has the slightest chance if being inconvenient.
Its deHispanicable. Do you know what they do with coyotes? Wolves get maybe an ounce of respect from people because of fiction and whatnot, but coyotes don't even get that. And because there aren't any legal repercussions for doing so, 500K coyotes are killed per year.
low tier: life is important or not. suffering is important or not.
mid tier: only some life and suffering is important. magic. care or burn in hell. trust me.
high tier: only things I personally like matter. I don’t care what you think unless it benefits me. I might also like killing you.
god tier: only energy efficiency matters, nothing else. those in disagreement will be selected out by natural mechanisms.
elder god tier: the goal of the universe is to be rid of life.
i do not eat humans but I respect the practice of eating human meat as long as meat humans and friend humans are kept separate and the meat humans live good lives without finding out they were born to die
And then they went home and ate live boiled cat. Your point?
My point is domesticated cats are pests and damaging to the environment and Chinese people agree,
Oh wow, well I didn't realize the chinese were on board with hating cats and I guess this changes NOTHING.
Nice digits. Do you know if there's much chinese outrage about dog festivals?
They're advocating humane farmed meat-dogs and shitting on us Westerners.
I find it striking how closely some arguments resemble things people say in the west
It’s almost like the only way you get news from China is through propagandized outlets
its almost like that's what the ccp wants
It's almost like these are people in tier 1 cities and the not the soulless bugmen living in rural areas, the ones torching dogs alive because they think they'll taste better if they die in agony and fear.
The people in tier 1 cities would likely eat the bugmen. Bery high in protein. Do not judge gweiro, you eat pork chop.
There is no humane way to farm something with a soul. This is just more proof that atheism removes all that stands between humans and evil. Any action can be justified and spun to sound good if you do not see god’s light. There is not the slightest constraint on “morality” - the evils of rhetoric are infinite. Without god you could have vegan death squads on the grounds that their executions are humane and prevent more suffering than they cause, which is likely the atheist’s future.
Please quote that part of the bible where god says that dogs have souls
Post proof that the gnomish god is the only god and the hindus, sikhs, etc aren’t allowed to call their ultimate god “god”
When a muslim cites god do you demand a KJV New Testament quote to back it up? Is either more or less valid than someone making shit up? A God is how people externalize their emotions to justify them to others. When others agree they form a group of naturally like minded people by sharing “god” and increase the fitness of the collective.
I think the best argument against eating dogs is because they're haram like cats and other fanged mammals.
>best argument against meat is sky garden gnome told me not to
>best argument for “meat” is lol bro nothing matters god isnt real
>what do you mean you can kill me then no humans are special sociopath! because they just ACK
>nooo you need to follow the book or else we’ll fall into cannibalism and sodomy
Well when people don't follow the book they fall into cannibalism and sodomy unless they make up another book forbidding cannibalism and sodomy
In fact prior to the book most people already had other books forbidding cannibalism and sodomy anyways. These books evolve through natural selection. Ideas that increase the survival rate and birth rate will proliferate with the people that have them. Animals that are unhealthy or inefficient sources of meat are not eaten, just so, things that kill other people and spread sickness are avoided, just so, and the end result is there is more food, and more people, better fed, spreading those ideas and having many children. it can be something as simple as people who don't jerk off have maybe one extra child. over time that is huge.
not a thing in christianity, some fag in the bible had a dream where god said we can and should eat literally anything
Made up by the romans because they were salty about the pork prohibition. The entire new testament is pagan fanfiction.
Muslims (saudis) and garden gnomes also basically control the world while the vatican does nothing and protestants are as backwater as afghans despite having fancy shit. Curious.
Stop eating bacon.
OK you gonna stop eating pork then and all meat on friday? Yeah thought so stfu retard hypocrite
You can totally make something up and it's as valid as any religion. Just look at what the chinese do. Same thing.
>your god isn't real
>OMG CONFUCIUS! FENG SHUI! MAGIC RHINO HORN!
>Your magic isn't real either
>just meat? pffft. dogs are the ones with souls. humans are just here to serve them. source? i am a wise man and it came to me in a dream.
feelings form the basis for morality
if someone does not feel empathy or that life is valuable they will not act on those feelings. for example we bred dogs to evoke empathy. a chinaman does not feel it. he only feels the need to virtue signal in a way that implies goodness to others on the world stage which is why his words come off as uncanny.
a westerner is deceived about what they eat. they all think every cow has been bred to be totally mindless, but only some cows are at that point. they think pigs are disgusting archons of sin and deserve it, but they were lied to, they act like small dogs.
a chinaman is just consistently pure evil. if you ask me, being proudly naturally evil is way worse than being conned into being evil. at least there’s hope in the latter case and people agree to change. a chinaman has no qualms with “ethical cannibalism” if he first learns how to describe it as ethical by watching westerners. he does not feel empathy or respect for life so he doesn’t understand the fundamental problem. it would be like explaining why rape is a crime to a duck.
You cant come off as ignorant of a life’s value if you don’t value any life at all! Gweiro hypoclits brown the fuck out
you're not being conned you little shit
you shut your eyes and refuse to see
"i'm sorry for sinning god the bacon was so tasty" fuck off
Being comfortably evil is better than being evil out of necessity and coping with it?
One person will change when doing so doesnt result in starvation with the first supply chain disruption. The other one will never change. They only get worse and more shamelessly hedonistic until their government daddy tells them to stop because of a resource shortage.
Only animals that eat other animals have souls immediately at birth. Herbivores can gain souls only by living several years due to the metaphysical presence of plants and all the insects they inadvertently consume.
>Being comfortably evil is better than being evil out of necessity and coping with it?
There's no necessity you christcuck schizoid. You don't need need to eat cheap bacon.
I don’t eat pork. I eat chicken because I am 100% confident they are as close to mindless as any common terrestrial animal gets outside of snakes, and believe we should switch to farming a domestic breed of fast growing boa that has lost the last glimmers of consciousness if no one is willing to engineer brainless cattle.
Humans do need to eat meat and the average vegfags global plate and supplements regime support that fact as well as any other evidence. A good human will make peace and look for better ways to eat meat. A bad one will ignore it all. The worst one values no life at all and does not feel empathy.
>A good human will make peace and look for better ways to eat meat.
That's exactly what that Chinaman in the comment was saying yet his words are virtue signaling but you're "real". How do we know you're not just virtue signaling?
Humans don't need meat because supplements exist, supplements are ethical and don't harm animals but you refuse to go vegan and insist on magical thinking your way into some arbitrary animal hierarchy where chickens are mindless when in fact you can train chicken to do tricks and they form strong bonds with their owners when they're kept as egg layers/pets.
Supplements don’t work 100% and can’t be manufactured without advanced infrastructure. Most food vegfags depend on needs to be shipped overseas or trucked from half a world away.
Humans need meat. Therefore humans need meat plants.
>chickens are totally smart guise
Sometimes you’re right. Other times it’s wishful thinking. This is the latter.
In any case the chinaman does not want meat but better. He wants meat but it doesn’t offend him personally to watch it unfold. We already know dogs, especially the primitive spitzes chinks eat, know death when they see it and try to avoid it. I think they would be genuinely more ethical if they switched their cunning, personality-laden meat dogs with the docile permanently-puppy pet dogs but even then dogs are still a tad too human. A snake with nothing but a brain stem controlling its heartbeat and respiration would basically be a slimy plant.
People genuinely believe it’s all spin and livestock isn’t even self aware.
>know death when they see it and try to avoid it
Find me an animals that doesn't. Hell even bacteria know death and try to avoid it as best as they can.
>can’t be manufactured without advanced infrastructure
We have the infrastructure and they do work 100% of the time. You're a cruel liar. Despite proclaiming you believe animals have souls and knowing how cruel the meat industry is you continue to eat meat when there is literally no need.
Thanks for proving you're stupid.
Lots of animals, believe it or not, suck at recognizing death and getting basic cause and effect down.
>it works 100% of the time
No, no it doesn’t, and it won’t. 200 years ago it didn’t even exist. We need meat plants, not container ships so you can eat and shit out ten pounds of kale to absorb half your iron requirements. Vegans are one global hardship away from universally admitting that eggs can be vegan and the “normalizing the potential for cruelty” was never a good argument. Smarter ones are already admitting that vat meat would be vegan although they are not smart enough to read how vat meat is made or consider the carbon footprint of running artificial wombs at an industrial scale.
Correct. Snakes are slimy bastards, and mostly meat. A brainless snake would be the easiest possible meat plant to create.
>Lots of animals, believe it or not
No. I don't need to "believe" anything because I know that being able to avoid death is necessary for life. If it's alive, it knows how to deal with things that can kill it. Stop anthropomorphizing animals.
>200 years ago
"Pure" vegan existed in India for thousands of years because the poorly washed vegetables they ate contained lots of insects which gave them enough micro nutrients to live to 80+.
I'm done with trying to reason with your no-carbon footprint meat-plant schizo shit.
There are countless animals that are unable to realize what happens next after you silently break the necks of 100 of their kin in full view. If it’s not a natural danger not many are intelligent enough.
Have you seen how weak those guys are? Eat an egg.
a snake wrote this post
Snakes aren't slimy stupid. We're dry and smooth. Go get an education.
Chickens are affectionate, empathetic and far more clever than people give them credit for. They respond to their names, have a sense of object permanence, learn quickly from past experiences and try to trick one another. They're not crow-level problem solvers but they have plenty of soul. The problem with people in general is that they struggle to read the emotions of birds because they're even less similar to us than mammals like dogs (like with their lack of facial muscles) so it leads us to assume they must be completely lacking in emotions and brain power. People would look at me like I'm crazy when I'd say that my tiel was obviously stressed because he couldn't get into a certain room to see someone because to them, his gestures just looked like mindless bobbing and flapping. That's considering tiels convey emotion with a moving crest. Chickens and birds in general deserve lots of love.
>They only get worse and more shamelessly hedonistic until their government daddy tells them to stop because of a resource shortage.
>Only animals that eat other animals have souls immediately at birth. Herbivores can gain souls only by living several years due to the metaphysical presence of plants and all the insects they inadvertently consume.
Do venus flytrap have soul?
>Only animals that eat other animals have souls immediately at birth. Herbivores can gain souls only by living several years due to the metaphysical presence of plants and all the insects they inadvertently consume.
you watch too many anime
Your don't make soul-gains by killing and eating animals.
>anon speaks divine truth
>deny it for no reason
i got holy auras off that post and consulted the machine elves. its true.
just whatever you do, don’t eat turtle.
>you refuse to see
Most people genuinely believe the animals they eat were born and died as worthless sacks of meat. Every single piece of media portrays them that way. Cherry picked footage shows that they don’t care about their situation or care about dying. The average person genuinely does not believe a pig ever really suffers or that they’re capable of it. They can’t tell if they do, they’re too inhuman.
Meanwhile the “more moral” chinese eat each other. Can’t be ignorant about a life if you don’t value any of them. Ching chung check matey.
>The average person genuinely does not believe a pig ever really suffers or that they’re capable of it.
The average person knows. The city liberal knows from vegan PETA propaganda and the average redneck farmer knows because he sends his animals to the abattoir. Very few people are genuinely ignorant. Tell someone you're vegan/vegetarian and they'll say that they love animals but steak/nuggets are too delicious for them to join you.
>we bred dogs to evoke empathy
And Chinamen mostly bred dogs for hunting and as labor animals. They also bred shit like pugs which they don't eat. They eat the mutt labor dogs same way people can keep chickens as house pets and still eat chicken.
>only the animals i find cute have souls
so tired of this cope
If you knew any Christian theology, you'd know all animals have a soul but only humans have a spirit. What you are saying now is blasphemy
>t. am in a discord server with a bunch of christian retards who debate theology all day cuz Waufcraft was a thing
dogs taste pretty good despite the myth about carnivores tasting bad. i heard it's the leopards favorite meal and wolves would prefer eating dogs over other herbs
So do humans. Dogs taste somewhat like human, between pork, beef, and veal. It’s no wonder the chinks love it.
I don't know. afaik dogs make up 40- 50% of a predators diet so I doubt that
Predators that learn how to hunt humans never stop and prefer them over everything else. Ask yourself why orcas really ram refugee boats
>probably drowned yeah
Don't think that's true. there's no statistic that has humans as close to #1 consumption. While dogs make up around half of a predators diet
Humans are harder to hunt than dogs and better at killing things that try to eat them. Man eaters get killed pretty fast.
Of course humans are harder, no one is denying that, but humans aren't close to being #1 in any diet of a predators diet, while dogs are
Because we kill them for trying and dogs don’t. Let me guess, you’re that youtube Black folk trolling.
Not all humans kill them and not all dogs just run away. but there's no evidence that humans are a preferred prey for any predator unlike dogs.
Orcas actually don't like to eat us. They're surprisingly picky when it comes to what they eat. My guess is they use echolocation to see if we'd be good to eat then get disappointed when they find out we're mostly bone.
get off the computer shamu we can see straight through your lies
orcas make a sport of making it look like humans drowned when they actually pull them under and eat them on the seabed. they like the bones. it cleans their teeth.
source : my ass
Because humans are fat and sedentary compared to other animals so they are much more tender and juicy
we're too fat, salty and sweet
animals need salt and proteins in the wild over fat
Because dogs aren't carnivores. Neither are humans.
that's what I heard too. i might just try dog meat just to say I have done it
human tastes way better. dog is tough and bitter in comparison. you should skip poor man's human and go straight to the good stuff.
as long as the human consents to being eaten nothing is wrong with it :^)
I don't man. Like the other guy said, Dog is a favorite meat for certain predators, meanwhile there are no cases for human being the majority of consumption for anyone
Dogs are easy to catch and were bred to be docile and fearful. The ones that weren't were bred to be plain stupid or suicidal fighters because they depend on humans to break up the fight, or were meant to fight humans, who are themselves really weak and squishy when working alone.
Groups of humans exterminate your entire species if you figure out how to eat them.
Humans are delicious, but anything that eats us just doesn't live long enough to pass that behavior on to its young. Every time a man eater is known it's hunted down and its cubs are killed if they're even present. Except for orcas. They have it figured out.
>go to the coasts with the shiny humans
>wait for the darker humans to show up
>knock their boat over
>position yourself vertically so you are harder to see
>pull humans under and spirit them away
>humans will think they just drowned, the shiny humans do not care for the darker ones and will not go looking for them
And god knows how many lone swimmers, surfers, and fisherman disappeared because orcas knew they could get away with it.
Remember, back towards the shore, humans eyes are attuned to picking out light colors because they're frugivores. if they see anything they'll think it was a reflection or someone's shoe.
Many animals are easy to catch, but certain animals would go for dogs than other animals. There's no case for humans being a favorite prey for it's illogical to think so. As of now, Dogs end up being majority of the diet of certain animals while humans are not.
You aren't capable of logical thought.
>Dogs taste better than most animals
>Humans taste better than all dogs
>Dogs are extremely easy to catch
>Humans kill any animal that eats humans
>Most animals can only pass knowledge on to their young, not within the same generation
>Animals that eat dogs survive to pass that behavior on to their young
>Animals that eat humans are killed with prejudice
>Humans aggressively exterminate nearby predators to avoid being eaten in the first place
"But surely humans can't taste good because nothing is eating them! Dogs must taste better because more animals eat them!"
You aren't capable of logical thought. Do bugs taste better than beef? More animals eat majority bugs than eat majority cow. Or maybe, bugs are just easier prey than cows.
You keep saying the same thing because but there's no basis for it. at least with certain animals, they would go specifically for certain animals for their preferred prey, and that's dogs. nothing to indicate the same for humans
>Humans can not taste good because most animals don't eat humans
>Also, humans kill every animal that eats humans
You aren't capable of logical thought.
Humans are delicious.
Again, do bugs taste better than beef because more animals eat bugs than animals eat beef? Do leaves taste better than meat because more animals eat leaves than eat meat? Easy meal != good meal. Domestic animals are extremely easy to hunt because they trust everything not to kill them.
its illogical to think humans don't taste good because we fucking kill everything that finds out
every single cannibal in history has outright stated that humans are the best tasting animals. when humans try human meat, it's addictingly good. meanwhile in asia where dog is readily available it's only an occasional dish. give us one good reason you wouldn't eat a human. meat is meat.
>every single cannibal in history has outright stated that humans are the best tasting animals.
I asked all of them
source: my ass
You're moving the goalpost. that link proves nothing. Once again certain animals prefer eating dogs and would avoid other eating animals to eat dogs. There has been 0 indication that humans are a preferred prey for other animals
You are not thinking logically. I already explained this to you. Animals are largely only capable of transferring learned behaviors to the next generation. Humans exterminate man eaters with zeal. For the few that have intra-generational knowledge transfer and the ability to hunt humans, we exterminated them (wolves). No matter how good humans taste, there will be very few animals known to eat them, because they are exterminated upon discovery.
Now. Answer the question. If more animals prefer bugs than beef, do bugs taste better than beef?
>If more animals prefer bugs than beef, do bugs taste better than beef?
If those animals had access and capability to other animals but go for specifically for bugs yes
Here's what you're not getting. No animals, except possibly orcas, have the access and capability to hunt humans, because humans have superior capabilities and stop it as soon as it starts.
The thing is there is 0 indication that other animals prefer eating humans over others so anything would be baseless. you could make a case for other prey based animals, but the dog is a sought out meal for other animals
When an animal learns it can eat humans, it eats them almost exclusively. Humans stop this behavior from spreading by killing man eaters ASAP. Therefore, even though humans are delicious, few animals eat humans. It is a rarely learned behavior because we do not look like what their mothers teach them to hunt and we kill them far before they can create subsequent generations of man eaters.
Once, there was an animal that was a prolific man eater. The wolf. Wolves are capable of very basic intra-generational knowledge transfer AKA culture. Once ONE wolf ate a man entire packs would know humans were food and they could bring that knowledge with them when they left their pack for a new one. We almost entirely exterminated wolves because of this and the remaining ones haven't been allowed the chance to figure out that we are edible any more than the average person realizes a stick bug is edible.
And once again everyone who has eaten human says we're delicious
If you can't understand this basic logic and make one more post demonstrating how stupid you are, I cease to consider you human from this point forward. Talking to you would be like talking to a whooping chimp. You have NO reason not to eat human. Meat is meat, and human is the most delicious meat.
>Once, there was an animal that was a prolific man eater
Source to that? How often were they the preferred prey.
You don't understand. The dog isn't the only delicious animal on earth, but it is one of the most sought out animal for certain animals. Humans have not been in that category yet. It's just speculation. Dogs are a top food source for other animals
I can repeat myself again and again but you don't have a full fledged human mind and will never understand a single word. You aren't intelligent enough to understand this. You aren't intelligent enough to understand that your "argument" is bad. In fact, I don't think you have any original thoughts. You're just repeating something you were told. Incessantly. Like a trained animal. You don't understand it, you just obey your master.
Thankfully, no matter how feeble your "brain" is, it tastes the same as any other. By all accounts humans are the tastiest thing on earth and I would kill and eat you in a heartbeat. It's not like your continued existence affects me in any way and you seem to have been humanely raised. mmm, free range human.
he really is incredibly stupid
it must be a liberal anglo, not a chink. chinks are actually smarter than that.
>stupid white progressive: hurr but dumb wild animals eat dogs and not people so dogs must taste good! fuck dogs! they're bad for le climate change too!
>Chinaman: Dogs taste alright, but even here where it is legal, we rarely eat them. They aren't that good. However, cannibalism is acceptable with a voluntary victim, and humans taste amazing.
You bring nothing new to the table. You keep on repeating yourself. There is nothing to believe that humans taste better than dogs. There are no predators that seek out for humans like others do for dogs. You're just going with "muh" feelings to sustain a case
I repeat myself because you repeat yourself. All you say is
>DUMB ANIMALS HUNT DUMB ANIMALS BUT NOT PEOPLE THEREFORE DUMB ANIMALS TASTE GOOD AND PEOPLE DON'T
Your argument is a fallacy. You do not move it forward. You just repeat this fallacy over and over therefore the only correct response is a repetition of the refutation until your neuron-deficient undersized brain processes it. Animals can be preferred prey for reasons other than taste. Animals can avoid being prey for reasons OTHER than taste. Does a tiger taste awful just because bears rarely eat them? No, the tiger could taste quite good and just be good at avoiding being eaten. You aren't intelligent enough to get this. You aren't intelligent, period. You are not capable of logic. You are not capable of critical thought. You are not capable of thought. Period.
Lions reportedly taste better than gazelle (more flavorful but less gamey, like a cross between beef and chicken), but lean ungulates are preferred prey by many animals and lions are not. The lean grazing animals are bitter and stringy, but the lion's flesh is supple from being well nourished and exercised and largely lazy. It's 100% about how easy they are to catch and how much they fight back.
Otherwise gazelle would eat lion because they definitely taste better than grass.
feline meat is notoriously good. i've had mountain lion and if i could, based on taste alone, i would eat mountain lion over any barn animal. it's like top quality pork loin all the way through. mild. delicate. the perfect culinary canvas. give me a mountain lion farm i'd use that shit for everything.
>Animals can avoid being prey for reasons OTHER than taste
No shit, and once again why I keep saying other animals would avoid other prey to eat dogs. You keep saying this but it doesn't change nothing. Dogs are a preferred prey for certain animals and should be compared with other preferred prey
Probably because they were bred not to fight back retard. Even a deer will fight for its life. A dog will not understand why you would kill it.
That doesnt matter when you have guns. Eat humans instead. Much tastier.
>Probably because they were bred not to fight back retard.
They both run away and both fight back when they have to feral dogs and deer are not a exception
>The thing is there is 0 indication that other animals prefer eating humans over others
you just proved me right
>can eat anything it wants
Let them eat. We boil lobsters alive and it’s seen as a fancy cuisine
as sustenance farming carnivores are full retard, but as a novel thing done humanely, eh...
I'm too biased but I guess it'd be fine maybe
as long as the fucking bugmen don't boil them alive for "flavor" or "virility" or some ching chong shit
thoughts on ethically farmed humans?
elites are already doing it and it's called united states of america.
tbh this link is probably blocked in your shithole
pretty sure usa today is only blocked in china
calm down, child
In general I'm against eating dogs because dogs aren't like other animals at all, they are man's bestfriend that have evolved alongside us dating back to when we were huddling around a fire.
I'm totally okay with eating pit bulls however, pit bulls aren't real dogs.
actually they are right about that concept of freedom, but it really only applies to america, and it's a libertarian and fascist concept of freedom really.
we're literally just as communistic as china though (and not a lot whole lot different when it comes to racial genocide but that's another story), only thing is you get to larp about your opinion mattering every few years which i'll admit is not much better, ya know fool me once shame on me fool me twice shame on everyone
Is eating dog illegal in america/europe?
As someone who keeps pet chickens and grew up around pigs and cows this is pretty much how I feel. I became a vegetarian because of my involvment with the animals. I'm sure you can love your cows and dissociate that from the steak you're eating. I can't.
Call me weak for it but looking down on people who eat dogs while eating pigs and cows is only possible through retard cope.
the idea that any animal has a genuine personality or self awareness and inherent value because of it is entirely unproven. it is delusion on the level of any religion, and retard cope for your own feelings as much as anything else. the idea that some animals are "real lives" and others aren't isn't very far removed from the idea that all of them are. in fact it's the same thing.
to me you are all in denial. your sense of empathy has gone haywire, it sees two eyes and starts filling in the blanks. how far apart or close together those eyes is the only thing separating someone that eats cow but not dog and can't see the difference between the two. your lower brain trying to apply a group survival instinct to the wrong species. the dog lover is just less broken because the dog is more similar to the right species for the instinct. logically you shouldn't even be averse to eating humans if they're properly processed and tested to eliminate the risk of prion disease. if you look down on cannibalism, but support war, abortion, or self defense and law enforcement using deadly force, you are a hypocrite. you have no excuse not to eat safe and humane human meat that isn't religion tier retard cope.
>bbbbbut people are important because muh fuggin darwin or something actually imma christian now
religion is not real. souls are not real. purpose is not real. your life is meaningless and you are just an animal. if you want purpose the closest you can get is serving people who are more powerful than you and have goals that are greater than just eating. but your purpose is only to them, no one else has a reason to care. maybe you should not even care, but then those people might sweep you aside or kill you because you're in the way of a plan they think is worth more than you alone. so you should be loyal to those people and do what they say. that is like god, but it is real and on earth. not a million conflicting fairy stories justifying your "emotions".
The only thing worse than reading a schizo rant is reading a commie schizo rant. Jesus Christ...
full on marxism is one giant schizo rant
>actually if you have a job you are alienated from the real purpose of man by the oppressive demons and they're draining you of your soul essence
there's a reason it appeals to the kind of people that spin dogs to ward off evil and eat powdered magic rhino keratin to improve their erections
Shut up, it's a very good schizo rant. I'm glad this website gives schizos a platform without downvotes pushing them into obscurity.
Imagine being this retarded and thinking you're smart.
>no dont kill the doggorinos!!!
>let them starve on the street or die in the pound while whitey mass produces the cutest doggorinos for their puppyhood
There are no good guys
There are some protests. The younger generation of chinks tend to be more progressive about such things.
They are illegal, and happen only in a few backwoods jungle mountain villages
They cover the signs on restaurants when foreigners come and make up fake menus for the festivals
Reminder Mao tried to end such practices in the Cultural Revolution and retarded westerners to this day still call him a monster for it.
most westeners are sociopaths
I can't read Chinese but the garden gnomegle translated comments were all about pros and cons and neutering etc. at length. This is was the ultimate blackpill.
>starts war with China because they tried to stop their Opium addicted population from buying it legally
>burn and loot their palace for fun
>every major western nation took part
>this happened more than once
China is the protagonist of history and the west is the villain.
China’s history is bloody. They just finished most of their genocide ages ago.
This. The history of every war in china is something like this
>emperor Fat Ass declared war on emperor Limp Dick
>20 million casualties
>20k civilians eaten