Zoomers don't seem to know that it's been used in English that way since forever. I hear that a lot and any time I say them I get 12 year old /misc/Black folk acting like I just put twitter pronouns in my bio.
fake news, he is the gender neutral pronoun in english
everything is a he until noted otherwise
why a group of people is called men, mankind, firemen, congressmen, and then if someone is known to be female you change it to the female pronoun
the profession is an actor, if you are a female doing it you are an actress
in the 90s feminist and gay propaganda started forcing everyone to nuspeak and say "he or she" instead of just he, and introduced things like "mail carrier" instead of mailman and now we've gotten to the point of using plurals even though the word "it" would already be sufficient if you really insist on removing gender from the language.
it hasn't been since forever, it's been one generation
>it hasn't been since forever, it's been one generation
You're just wrong. There are plenty of sources that contradict your claim here, but I'm sure that you'll call them "pozzed israeli psyops" or some other room-temperature-IQ dismissive phrase.
>"pozzed israeli psyops"
not him and this is a shit thread so I'm allowed to say this, but whether past usage was like that or not does not invalidate that this is what I'm quoting
"Him" is the default in English for an animate object of unknown gender. Stop trying to sound smarter than you are, troony.
it is the normal way people refer to an ungendered animal. them is used, in my experience, for people of unknown gender. but he is definitely not the default i. e. you are literally ESL and should refrain from lessons in your non native languages.
Zoomers don't seem to know that it's been used in English that way since forever. I hear that a lot and any time I say them I get 12 year old /misc/Black folk acting like I just put twitter pronouns in my bio.
It's weird how it's almost impossible to tell the gender of a raccoon from an image.
Yes, ESL; it is apt to utilize the word "them" if the object of the sentence is a person or creature of unknown sex. In addition — before you even bother saying it — there is no rule stating that animals must always be referred to as "it".
If we are going by that logic it would be "Her" moron. Listen to any account of a boat or vehicle which are animate objects of no perceiveble gender in English countries and you will hear feminine pronouns or names. Unless you actually meant something like "individual/person of unknown gender" if you were able to use English to correctly articulate the point you are trying and failing to make. Go back to your containment board brainlet and go back to high-school while you are at it so you can actually learn how to speak English.
https://i.imgur.com/Mq9QWlG.jpg
>Nooooo! There can't be multiple anons in a thread that think I am moronic ESL third worlder they are just one schizo! >I am not a schizo who knows nothing about the English language who can't stop digging a hole nooooo!
I will save you from further embarrassment and accept your concession. Accept your caste as a low life third worlder and do not attempt to try and come off as some intellectual vanguard against cultural decadence. Your a Black person homosexual shitting up Wauf of all places and would make pic rel wince in your presence.
colloquial use of the singular "them" was fairly uncommon in english speaking countries when referring to non-human animals, and, by a lesser extent, humans, until fairly recently. yes, use of the singular "them" is grammatically correct, but it remains far, far more common to refer to an animal of an unknown species using the pronouns "it" or "he."
usage of "them" in place of "it"/"he" for animals and "she"/"her" increased starting in 2018 or so. while you can find historical usage of the singular "they," in modern connotations it is generally used as a deliberately "gender neutral" pronoun rather than a situational one.
all of this is to say: just call the fricking racoon "it." don't be a homosexual about it. >t. Waufgay with a linguistics degree
>yes, use of the singular "them" is grammatically correct >you can find historical usage of the singular "they,"
The only things that matter. >in modern connotations it is generally used as a deliberately "gender neutral" pronoun rather than a situational one.
Irrelevant. >just call the fricking racoon "it." don't be a homosexual about it.
Shut the frick up, homosexual. The only thing matters is that it is grammatically correct. >Waufgay
Go back to homosexual poetry board, homosexual.
Yes, ESL; it is apt to utilize the word "them" if the object of the sentence is a person or creature of unknown sex. In addition — before you even bother saying it — there is no rule stating that animals must always be referred to as "it".
If we are going by that logic it would be "Her" moron. Listen to any account of a boat or vehicle which are animate objects of no perceiveble gender in English countries and you will hear feminine pronouns or names. Unless you actually meant something like "individual/person of unknown gender" if you were able to use English to correctly articulate the point you are trying and failing to make. Go back to your containment board brainlet and go back to high-school while you are at it so you can actually learn how to speak English.
>Imagine thinking people taking the piss out of your ESL ass are troons
You third worlders are insufferable. I am not talking, I am writing. Why haven't you done your home work on the English langauge homosexual? Next thing you need to do is learn how to swim so you don't drown in the kali yuga while being an insufferable Black person on an image board. Look at animal pics and frick off before you embarrass yourself even more.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Get that HRT rage under control sister.
5 months ago
Anonymous
I dont fall under that sort of political spectrum to be compelled to do that.
But I agree with
Autism.
that you fall under some kind of spectrum.
5 months ago
Anonymous
You agree with one of your headmates? Must be a good day for the system.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Nooooo! There can't be multiple anons in a thread that think I am moronic ESL third worlder they are just one schizo! >I am not a schizo who knows nothing about the English language who can't stop digging a hole nooooo!
I will save you from further embarrassment and accept your concession. Accept your caste as a low life third worlder and do not attempt to try and come off as some intellectual vanguard against cultural decadence. Your a Black person homosexual shitting up Wauf of all places and would make pic rel wince in your presence.
>blah blah blah
If you are referring to an animal (or an inanimate object) and you are so moronic that you will be butthurt at assuming the wrong gender on its behalf, you can refer to it as, "it," as you can see I have done multiple times and it sounds natural.
Only absolute morons use them/they for singular gender neutral pronouns. In the history of the English language, them/they for singular pronouns has been incorrect until the last few years, and even then only by a small minority. Assuming it is here to stay is akin to thinking whatever dumbass zoomer terms have popped up recently (e.g. rizz) is going to be part of the English lexicon for generations.
>blah blah blah
If you are referring to an animal (or an inanimate object) and you are so moronic that you will be butthurt at assuming the wrong gender on its behalf, you can refer to it as, "it," as you can see I have done multiple times and it sounds natural.
Only absolute morons use them/they for singular gender neutral pronouns. In the history of the English language, them/they for singular pronouns has been incorrect until the last few years, and even then only by a small minority. Assuming it is here to stay is akin to thinking whatever dumbass zoomer terms have popped up recently (e.g. rizz) is going to be part of the English lexicon for generations.
Case in point: if you refer to a boat as it, no one will bat an eye. Absolutely every single inanimate object you can think of that you can refer to as she could also just as easily be referred to as it. Conversely, the vast majority of inanimate objects will be referred to as it and if you were to refer to it as a she, you would be an absolute fricking weirdo.
We could have had a fun thread about fat coons and but of course some morons have to sperg out over pronouns.
why is he in prison
Them? Theres only one
ABSOLUTE BIG CHONKER
why are raccoons a pest only in america?
I wanted to save the picture but your shitty f*moid conversation ruins the whole picture.
Old people where i live buy hotdogs and marshmallows and feed the racoons so theyre all obese
Raccoons can't resist the goyslop.
No one can. Goyslop is designed to be addictive
>hug the racoon
>racoon vomits all over you
It's weird how it's almost impossible to tell the gender of a raccoon from an image.
since there's no rope around the coon's neck, it is safe to assume he's not a troon
>them
raccoons are male animals by default
Forced perspective is doing a lot of work here.
them? theres like several?
Them as in a gender neutral pronoun I think.
No, not the troon kind.
Zoomers don't seem to know that it's been used in English that way since forever. I hear that a lot and any time I say them I get 12 year old /misc/Black folk acting like I just put twitter pronouns in my bio.
fake news, he is the gender neutral pronoun in english
everything is a he until noted otherwise
why a group of people is called men, mankind, firemen, congressmen, and then if someone is known to be female you change it to the female pronoun
the profession is an actor, if you are a female doing it you are an actress
in the 90s feminist and gay propaganda started forcing everyone to nuspeak and say "he or she" instead of just he, and introduced things like "mail carrier" instead of mailman and now we've gotten to the point of using plurals even though the word "it" would already be sufficient if you really insist on removing gender from the language.
it hasn't been since forever, it's been one generation
How old are you
Looking for fresh teenagers to groom on discord?
>it hasn't been since forever, it's been one generation
You're just wrong. There are plenty of sources that contradict your claim here, but I'm sure that you'll call them "pozzed israeli psyops" or some other room-temperature-IQ dismissive phrase.
>"pozzed israeli psyops"
not him and this is a shit thread so I'm allowed to say this, but whether past usage was like that or not does not invalidate that this is what I'm quoting
What in the actual frick is that spacing? Jesus christ. Your formatting is just as shit your brain dead historical take.
Lurk moar gaygit.
Autism.
You're right. Them is used for plural.
>I want to hug it
Is proper English.
it is the normal way people refer to an ungendered animal. them is used, in my experience, for people of unknown gender. but he is definitely not the default i. e. you are literally ESL and should refrain from lessons in your non native languages.
colloquial use of the singular "them" was fairly uncommon in english speaking countries when referring to non-human animals, and, by a lesser extent, humans, until fairly recently. yes, use of the singular "them" is grammatically correct, but it remains far, far more common to refer to an animal of an unknown species using the pronouns "it" or "he."
usage of "them" in place of "it"/"he" for animals and "she"/"her" increased starting in 2018 or so. while you can find historical usage of the singular "they," in modern connotations it is generally used as a deliberately "gender neutral" pronoun rather than a situational one.
all of this is to say: just call the fricking racoon "it." don't be a homosexual about it.
>t. Waufgay with a linguistics degree
>yes, use of the singular "them" is grammatically correct
>you can find historical usage of the singular "they,"
The only things that matter.
>in modern connotations it is generally used as a deliberately "gender neutral" pronoun rather than a situational one.
Irrelevant.
>just call the fricking racoon "it." don't be a homosexual about it.
Shut the frick up, homosexual. The only thing matters is that it is grammatically correct.
>Waufgay
Go back to homosexual poetry board, homosexual.
lmao at rightoids being triggered over a single word
there were, then it ate them
>them
Talking about the cuties at the back
Yes, ESL; it is apt to utilize the word "them" if the object of the sentence is a person or creature of unknown sex. In addition — before you even bother saying it — there is no rule stating that animals must always be referred to as "it".
"Him" is the default in English for an animate object of unknown gender. Stop trying to sound smarter than you are, troony.
If we are going by that logic it would be "Her" moron. Listen to any account of a boat or vehicle which are animate objects of no perceiveble gender in English countries and you will hear feminine pronouns or names. Unless you actually meant something like "individual/person of unknown gender" if you were able to use English to correctly articulate the point you are trying and failing to make. Go back to your containment board brainlet and go back to high-school while you are at it so you can actually learn how to speak English.
>inb4 muh animals are animate objects and not sentient organisms
Youre talking but all I hear is the sound of wieners being severed
>Imagine thinking people taking the piss out of your ESL ass are troons
You third worlders are insufferable. I am not talking, I am writing. Why haven't you done your home work on the English langauge homosexual? Next thing you need to do is learn how to swim so you don't drown in the kali yuga while being an insufferable Black person on an image board. Look at animal pics and frick off before you embarrass yourself even more.
Get that HRT rage under control sister.
I dont fall under that sort of political spectrum to be compelled to do that.
But I agree with
that you fall under some kind of spectrum.
You agree with one of your headmates? Must be a good day for the system.
>Nooooo! There can't be multiple anons in a thread that think I am moronic ESL third worlder they are just one schizo!
>I am not a schizo who knows nothing about the English language who can't stop digging a hole nooooo!
I will save you from further embarrassment and accept your concession. Accept your caste as a low life third worlder and do not attempt to try and come off as some intellectual vanguard against cultural decadence. Your a Black person homosexual shitting up Wauf of all places and would make pic rel wince in your presence.
>blah blah blah
If you are referring to an animal (or an inanimate object) and you are so moronic that you will be butthurt at assuming the wrong gender on its behalf, you can refer to it as, "it," as you can see I have done multiple times and it sounds natural.
Only absolute morons use them/they for singular gender neutral pronouns. In the history of the English language, them/they for singular pronouns has been incorrect until the last few years, and even then only by a small minority. Assuming it is here to stay is akin to thinking whatever dumbass zoomer terms have popped up recently (e.g. rizz) is going to be part of the English lexicon for generations.
Case in point: if you refer to a boat as it, no one will bat an eye. Absolutely every single inanimate object you can think of that you can refer to as she could also just as easily be referred to as it. Conversely, the vast majority of inanimate objects will be referred to as it and if you were to refer to it as a she, you would be an absolute fricking weirdo.
Reject coon, acquire harem.
wholesome animal torture
Nobody forced it to eat anything, they caught it like that.
they don't get that fat without human trash
nobody forces them to eat human trash, in fact most try to prevent raccoons from fricking with their trashcans
Untrue
Animals get fat for winter, no human intervention needed
Maybe they do, but the one OP posted is preparing for a nuclear winter.
fpbp
Please don't reply to yourself.