>ask question about an animal's behavior
>inevitably godless atheist comes in: "UMMM THAT'S JUST HOW THEY EVOLVED BRO"
i'm so sick of this
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
>ask question about an animal's behavior
what the frick are you stupid Black folk doing still bumping this shit, there's an option literally designed to tell OP to frick off without keeping his garbage thread alive
Did your Wauf thread get deleted?
>ask question about an animal's behavior
>inevitably moronic believer comes in: "UMMM THAT'S JUST HOW GOD MADE THEM BRO"
i'm so sick of this
this never happens
unironically happened in this very thread
that's my post. i know what i said in my post and it's incompatible with what you said
It really isn't.
most smartest Wauf user
I will end this discussion here. The earth is very evidently only 6000 years old. Nearly every argument in favor of evoluciferianism has been faked to send millions of otherwise GOD knowing souls straight to hell. We need to reject evoluciferianism on all fronts and restore the truth of recent creation, the flood, and of the glory of GOD and CHRIST. You need to be saved to go to to heaven. You need to have faith and a relationship with the Lord GOD and JESUS CHRIST. THERE IS POWER IN HIS BLOOD. I COMMAND IN THE NAME IF THE LORD THAT ALL IN THIS THREAD SHALL BE SAVED. PRAISE GOD PRAISE CHRIST.
>The earth is very evidently only 6000 years old.
Why are there monster skeletons petrified under the earth? If your answer is cooler than modern dinosaurs I will convert.
The flood of Noah. Read the bible.
Boring
Better but not sure it’s cooler than giant lizards
Why are the skeletons arranged in strata according to age instead of just one big muddy layer?
nephilim. they possessed unnatural and demonic abilities such as shapeshifting into those monstrous creatures whereas human skinwalkers can only do deer and goats. don't tell me you've never read devilman
bad larp, 0/8 b8 m8
this thread is not about animals or nature.
Christcucks have become rampant on this site over the past few years.
israelite-on-a-stick cultists are going to be in the majority on any english speaking website until America manages to undo it's christian subversion (hint: not soon), but 2016 has made everyone just a bit more deranged. It's not getting better, so just hide, ignore, and sage.
>God personally, manually designed every spiecies of beetle because creating a simple mechanism that would do it instead is beyond mind of the Allmighty
Creationists blaspheme against God's infinite ingenuity by insisting that He is no smarter than they are.
The bible must be the word of god and is the single and only source attesting to his existence and the validity of all christian morality
The bible says "god created each creature", that's not a metaphor. It's an explicit statement. If any part of the bible is wrong then it must not be the word of god and you need to figure out another moral system, unfortunately, most likely at the cost of some of the more left field biblical morals, like those forbidding homosexuality wholesale, because the closest you could get to a rational system is requiring homos to use condoms and lay off the dragon dildos, fisting, and child molestation.
So, you either deny evolution, or you are not a christian. You follow some other religion, maybe a fake one like worship of the concept of "nature" in place of god (logically and spiritually invalid, wheres your frickin druids) or some utilitarian, darwinian imperative stuff that inevitably gets too complex due to kin selection factors and the inevitable intrusion of nihilism.
You genuinely have to be trolling, you even Reddit Spaced.
>ask question about an animal's behavior
>inevitably god-loving christian comes in: "UMMM THAT'S JUST HOW GOD CREATED THEM BRO"
got me to respond/10
Unironically yes. Occam's razor and all that.
Assuming you're correct is foolish, why are you assuming your god is real? Doubt everything, believe nothing
>Told to doubt everything
>Get told man evolved
Ok. Doubt.
don't tell me what to do, asss wipe. i will believe what i want to goddamn believe and question what i damn well please
could you give me an example? this sounds interesting
The mating dance of the peawiener spider.
Uhhhhh thats just how they evolved.
Obviously. Look at the practicality. I too, decide my mate based on ass shaking. I owe 50,000 in child support, and have 3 ex wives. Winning.
i'm gonna say subconscious intelligent design
>male jumping spider meets (naturally bigger) female face-to-face
>random mutation makes him twitch his backlegs when startled
>the female, seeing this, hesitates, giving the male a chance to jump on and mate
>this continues for generations with selective preference for flashier, more elaborate "dances" needed to keep the female captivated
Pretty much. Animals can learn instinct through generations, my blue healers both nip the heels of cattle without being taught. But their ancestors had to be taught first. And the idea that a spider shook its rear once and it just kept escalating all by itself from that point is a very long stretch.
>Animals can be changed through genetics, but only when it's humans that manipulate them.
Selective breeding, yeah. It's why we have dalmations. But no matter how many times you breed dogs, you never end up with a fox.
>But no matter how many times you breed dogs, you never end up with a fox.
But you can breed them enough times to end up with Dingos.
how many generations would it take?
A wild dog that, can, breed with dogs. Thus, a dog.
Dogs can breed with wolves. Wolves can breed with coyotes. Thus, coyotes are dogs.
Basically every Canis species can interbreed, therefore the only thing to assume is that they are all identical. Ken Ham has done it again folks
i like your logic
pic is for (YOU)
This is the exact logic evolutionists use. A sea slug and a man both have buttholes, therefore we can reason based on this evidence that salamanders are the missing link between sea slugs and man. Obviously related, 10/10 i am so smert. Let me scrap together bones from the dirt and tell you exactly how this animal lived and why it suits my theory.
And the logic creationists use is grizzly bears and polar bears are actually the same species because they can breed and they just happen to look and act so different because God likes playing little pranks on his humies.
i've never met a christian who doesn't believe a coyote can become a dog or some prehistoric simian can become a chimpanzee with enough time and reason
>some prehistoric simian can become a chimpanzee with enough time and reason
They still claim that humans didn't come from simians.
And yet you atheist tards will try and tell us chickens and 5 ton lizards are relatives, and that whales and antelope share a family line. Yet when someone says animals that can breed, eat the same diet, make the same sounds, you try to tell us how far apart they are from each other?
Yes. Just because two animals are phylogenetically related it doesn't mean they belong to the same species.
Phylogeny is a satanic lie straight from the serpent's mouth
Schizo
Motte and bailey. The sea slug analogy is the mott, not being able to deduce characteristics from any amount of morphology is the bailey
And you won't end up with a banana, spider or your grandpa either. You'll get something new. Read evolution faq if you don't understand.
And always remember evolution was never the question, it was and is the only good answer to "why are pretty much all organisms based on similar basic principles and can be sorted according to various deviations in their structures?" or something like that.
"God made it!" IS an answer too, but not a good one since you can't prove it by new creatures popping up out of nowhere and because it would mean god is a lazy idiot and his design idiotic at times.
I wish visiting school until grade 9 was mandatory, like flat earth this kind of shit stopped being funny fast.
okay then
>Christians: ACTUALLY ACCORDING TO THE MAGISTERIUM CATHOLICA WE CAN FIND REFERENCES IN JOHN 7 8 21 3 AND PETER (PAUL EDITION) 9 3456 23 THAT WHEN READ IN CONTEXT WITH 87 JESUITS 86 50 23 IN THE ORIGINAL GREEK THE CHURCH HAS DECIDED THAT SO LONG AS YOU HAVE FAITH AND SIN NO MORE THEN THE HOLY SPIRIT WHO IS NOT THE HOLY GHOST BLABLABLABLA
>atheists: mutant spiders have more sex
doesn't work. the practical aspect is that their god warped reality and just made animals the way they are
Lots of jumping spiders dance. A peawiener spider just has brighter colours than most
>i'm so sick of this
Then stop making threads. Its a win-win for everyone.
Go crawl back to
where you belong, moron.
>Hypothetical question for fun sake
>no fun redditor comes in with
>muh square cube law that he doesn't even know well enough to recite it hoping we'll be impressed with his lack of insight and imagination
I genuinely hate most of this board apart from people who just post picture
You know the israelites won once they've successfully tricked society to become largely anti-intellectual.
That has nothing to do with my post.
I have nothing against science or academics apart from the social sciences and their lack of critical oversight. I just take issue with people who cannot see the difference between entertainment and science. You're probably one of them clearly but with politics. Just boring pedants with nothing to offer to besides the same tired rhetoric.
Nah, you're probably one of those imbeciles who goes "DAHR, SCIENCE IZ SOI!" whenever evidence is presented that goes against whatever agenda you have.
I just plain don't read click bait science. I don't have the time to go about picking apart their methodology or their tracking their funding or looking at who conducted it or making gay little threads to whine about it. If it's not in one of the journals my library has, or isn't a topic that catches my intrest I don't read it and sociology is not one of them.
>I willfully choose to be a moron and you have to respect my choice!
kek
I choose not to squander what little life I have at being mad institutions I can't challenge. But by all means keep taking the bait and throwing yourself against the wall while not being published or making any tangible impact on the world outside of the shitty threads you make.
>everyone I disagree with is the same person, and they keep following me around and calling me moronic all day!
I've got some bad news for you anon
you guessed it
you're a fricking moron.
Do you have the braincells to make an argument that isn't
>Summarize and misconstrue what he said
*Cool kid finisher*
it's so annoying man. these double digit IQs greentext you, completely mangle what you say and then act like they got you in a corner
and you go ahead and keep being a smoothbrain that considers all studies automatically wrong because one of them found out facts that you didn't like
I don't consider them wrong because I don't consider them at all. Could be right could be wrong only thing I know for certain is we're nowhere close to the bottom of it.
I get you anon, so many articles don't even bother to link the studies they speak of and when you check them you find nothing of value or that It's funded by the most biased entity in existence, It's just better to watch documentaries and post images, nothing wrong with trying to help the people you care around you though, but yeah politics also fricking suck
Don't bother. Atheists don't even see themselves as separate from animals, why try to reason with them? They claim they are nothing more than animals, so treat them like it. It's what they want.
Because we aren't?
>humans aren't animals because.... they just aren't!!! ok chud?
Christian narcissism strikes again, you guys don't even attempt to hide it anymore.
>Proves my point
Thanks, I guess. Can't say I expected a better retort from dogs.
If your point is being a fricking mongoloid contrarian who hates science because it's "soi", then yea, we basically proved it.
I don't understand why you're getting mad. I'm literally agreeing with you when you say you're no different from a dog.
http://thegrandexperiment.com/whale-evolution.html
Here's your irrefutable, uncorrupted science by the way. Reminds me of the guys who thought radium was healthy to ingest and the covid vax is safe because science said so.
>http://thegrandexperiment.com/whale-evolution.html
>a whole load of nothing from a producer with minimal understanding of anatomy thinking he’s got everything figured out
Lmao
How so? The scientists portrayed features that were never found in the specimens in order to fit it in a spot in the evolutionary chain. Just like piltdown man. The "proof" supporting evolution is extremely shoddy and is riddled with fraud.
handwave handwave handwave
if you don't have anything of substance to say don't speak your mind.
>The scientists portrayed features that were never found in the specimens in order to fit it in a spot in the evolutionary chain
No they didn’t, all their claims of pieces being added to “make up” an evolutionary link just show how little they know. He claims that no fossils of the blowhole region were found and therefore adding a blowhole is misleading. That’s bullshit, since we have species like Cynthiacetus where it is preserved. They’re not making up skeletons, they’re using what they already know about it’s relatives to fill in the blanks. If tigers were extinct and you only had the back half of a tiger skeleton does that make it a lie to give it a feline skull when you had previously found a lion skeleton with the front preserved? He’s a fricking moron
Yes they fricking did you idiot. Can't you read? Have you been to a museum? Opened a text book? The first specimen of rodhocetus was discovered without a tail, and without front legs, and it didn't have a blowhole certainly. And yet even now, after discoveries of more remains that had those things intact, they still portray them in textbooks and museums as having a fluked tail, and front flippers. Even though it is known that this is not the actual case. It is falsified information. They lied about it, to fit their narrative. Just like Piltdown man. "Using your imagination" to fill in the blanks, and you happen to imagine something which fits an agenda when there's no evidence to support is falsifying evidence. If we had never seen an elephant, and all we had was the skull and so someone imagined that the lower body was that of a man's to support his idea of a cyclops, it'd be as inaccurate as what these men did. There's no excuse.
>words words words handwave handwave handwave im right because i just am ok chuderinos?!?!?
still no substance.
You’re dumber than I thought
>and it didn't have a blowhole certainly
Yes it did. We have a shitload of archaeocete skulls, and plenty of them have the front half of the skull with the blowholes preserved. He’s claiming that because that specimen didn’t have limbs or the blowhole preserved then it must be a hoax, however he failed to consider the fact there are multiple specimens of multiple species of pakicetus which each preserve different parts of the body. Besides even if we entirely ignored things like rhodocetus and pakicetus, that wouldn’t account for whales like Basilosaurus which still had tiny back legs despite being fully aquatic and incapable of walking, and a blowhole halfway between that of a modern whale and primitive one like pakicetus
>Whales with four legs, walking on land, are currently considered one of the best fossil proofs of evolution
this guy is pants on head moronic
Christians insist upon being mentally ill, and also claim a book that contains passages instructing them to murder people is the word of god. Therefore the only rational thing to do is lock them up.
Humans are animals. To be specific, humans are dogs. A domesticated pack hunting carnivore with two forward facing eyes and an unusually large penis. A dog is just a hobo who forgot how to walk and is unusually hairy. Teach a dog to walk and shave and behold, a man.
truth
I hate when they double down and try to derail the conversation. You ask how much Bigfoot would weigh and you get a bunch of tiresome blah blah blah
I know what you mean. Animals have their own reasons for doing the things they do, and being the way they be, and people need to respect that more.
>(an indiedev)
Nice LARP.
>go to any board
>inevitably deranged theist comes in: "UHMM CAN I COME MAKE THINLY VEILED RELIGION THREADS HERE"
i'm so sick of this
Religious world. Keep malding ugly
The world has never been less religious than it is today, religions will continue to decline in the following years
Only in shitholes lmao, religiosity is a coping mechanism for people trapped by deprivation and poverty.
spbp, It's either that or american politics, nu-Wauf is truly dead
kinda funny how you all screech like vampires at religion
homie you are simping for a book that gives you explicit instructions to murder people with 5+ witnesses if they preach from a different book than you, and then later your "love and forgiveness" savior says "all that still applies". your entire religious institution is one "woops, that was a mistranslation" away from becoming a threat to global peace and having to be wiped out by the chinese.
I kneel
all of that just to insinuate you're not petrified by religion
disgusted by christians and israelites in particular because at least the muslims are honest about being animal hating/fricking murder fetishists that rape little boys when bored
you like them because they're zoophiliac pederasts in your head?
>Conquering people to spread your faith and get more people into heaven le bad!
Amen brother, Allah is great!
*Bows*
Do you think it isn't?
Care to explain your reasoning for why it isn't? Or are you choosing the edgy option to look more cool in front of your Wauf friends?
except literally every other religion says you are actually getting more people into hell.
Thats ok, china will be conquering you to save you from inefficient and moronic behaviors that create hell on earth. Atheism is the way forward and the official religion of the single most powerful country on earth.
They also hate gay people i'm sorry to say so you might not enjoy it that much after getting used to christian forgiveness. On the bright side, they're on the verge of putting dog and cat meat in the past since the only obstacle was the sheer number of poors depending on it (which eventually turned into poors just *stealing* it even when there wasn't a famine).
>post flamebait on animal board in hopes of starting a dick measuring contest
>people reply
yeah how odd
No, religion's fine but he's right, It doesn't have to constantly derail threads wether that's because of atheists or anyone else, It's about as funny the 28193th time as Wauf calling everything a "troony" and posting questionable images in threads that have nothing to do with It
this post best post
This is what leftism/rightism does to your brain.
R-r-r..... REDDDIIIIIITITITTTT!!!!!!
The TRannIeS HAvE ComE To HaRM ME PleASe HelP ME!!!!!!!
BBBBBBBBBRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPsnnnnniiiiiiffffffffffff...oh yes my dear....sssnnnnnnnnnnnniiiiiiiiffffffff....quite pungent indeed...is that....dare I say....sssssssnniff...eggs I smell?......sniff sniff....hmmm...yes...quite so my darling....sniff....quite pungent eggs yes very much so .....ssssssssssssssnnnnnnnnnnnnnnniiiiiiiffffff....ah yes...and also....a hint of....sniff....cheese.....quite wet my dear....sniff...but of yes...this will do nicely....sniff.....please my dear....another if you please....nice a big now....BBBBBBRRRRRRRAAAAAAAPPPPPPPFFFFFFFFLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPPPPFFFFFF Oh yes...very good!....very sloppy and wet my dear....hmmmmm...is that a drop of nugget I see on the rim?...hmmmm.....let me.....let me just have a little taste before the sniff my darling.......hmmmmm....hmm..yes....that is a delicate bit of chocolate my dear....ah yes....let me guess...curry for dinner?....oh quite right I am....aren't I?....ok....time for sniff.....sssssnnnnnnniiiiiiiiffffffff.....hmmm...hhhmmmmm I see...yes....yes indeed as well curry......hmmm....that fragrance is quite noticeable....yes.....onion and garlic chutney I take it my dear?.....hmmmmm....yes quite.....BBBBBBRRRRRRRRPPPPPPFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFTTTTTTTTTTT Oh I was not expecting that…that little gust my dear….you caught me off guard…yes…so gentle it was though…hmmmm…let me taste this little one…just one small sniff…..sniff…ah….ssssssnnnnnniiiiiffffffffffff…and yet…so strong…yes…the odor….sniff sniff…hmmm….is that….sniff….hmmm…
What kind of question?