>You are more closely related to a rat than a crocodile is to an alligator.

>You are more closely related to a rat than a crocodile is to an alligator.

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    good

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    That is total bullshit, crocodiles and alligators are in the same family.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      mammal vs crocogatorus

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >you are more related to a banana than a mushroom

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >OP (me btw) is lyin-

    ?t=322
    BOOM, denyers BTFO

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    just start listening you common sense instead of this nonsense

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is not true. But! We are more related to salanamber than the sandamanner is to lizards

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      woah

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Bullshit. They look just slimy little lizards!

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Also false.

      we don't know when sillymanders diverged from reptiles or mammals, so there is no basis for saying one is more related than the other aside from genetics and morphology, both of which indicate lizards are more closely related.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Oh I didn't know you were gnomish

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Rats and humans are in different orders, crocodiles and alligators are not. Rats and humans diverged earlier than crocodiles and alligators. Verdict: no

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Linnaean rank is not an indicator of degree of relatedness. Mammalian orders aren't equal to reptilian orders.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I know, but that doesn’t mean it’s not a good indicator that OP is likely wrong

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          OP is very definitely wrong by any of the usual metrics.

          temporal distribution, genetic similarity, and morphometrics are a few. Probably some others I'm not thinking of right off the bat.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          OP is very definitely wrong by any of the usual metrics.

          temporal distribution, genetic similarity, and morphometrics are a few. Probably some others I'm not thinking of right off the bat.

          the only question I have is if OP was cracking a joke about people misunderstanding phylogeny, and if so, who he hangs out with that is actually this dumb.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >the Paleogene was 40 years ago

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >there are several ways to measure degree of relatedness and OP is a gay in all of them

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/0rP3E4e.jpg

      based off-topic frogposters

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Croc and gator diverged 80ma
    Rodents diverged 106 ma

    So no

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Where are the proofs different euarchontoglires diverged so early?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >proofs
        kek

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          So you concede?

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      ribirt

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/HjfkNDK.jpg

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *