Why pic related is so boring and uninteresting compared to "Walking with Dinosaurs" or "When Dinosaurs Roamed America"?

Why pic related is so boring and uninteresting compared to "Walking with Dinosaurs" or "When Dinosaurs Roamed America"? I just can't get into it and i hate how most of the dinosaurs and marine/flying reptiles are portrayed.

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Cgi and photography were amazing, but the narrative seems to just use scenes of modern animals in documentaries and copy paste the dinosaurs into them. It's stuff we've all seen before in modern documentaries - wolf chasing deer in snow, bizarre mating dances etc. And the scenes linger too long to pad out the episode length.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >The JOOOOOOS want you to think dinosaurs were warm blooded!!!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      seriously, why don't mods ban these idiots back to 4chan? Is it just one autist? He sounds like the paleoschizo that's in every thread

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >He sounds like the paleoschizo that's in every thread
        that's him going for his 356th racism ban

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It seems unfair to call him paleoschizo

        the dumbass doesn't know anything about paleontology.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why don't you fuck off back to that pedo pit reddit where you belong?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >NOOO YOU CAN'T JUST DEBOONK MY PRECIOUS FAKE SOURCE!!!

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's your only source

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I read papers.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            no you don't.

            I've seen you cite material from (1) paper in the last 10 years that wasn't found in the title or first sentence of the abstract.

            and even then you got it wrong.
            I assume you didn't read the paper, you just found someone on reddit complaining about the paper and copied their complaint here.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it lacked a sense of wonder. I really liked the sauropod dueling though that was cool

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because the concept and narrative were taken directly from Planet Earth and other BBC documentaries. And by "taken" I don't mean inspired by, I mean TAKEN. Almost every single vignette is based on one from Planet Earth, down to the goddamn editing. And narrative wasn't Planet's Earth strong point. So, apart from the accurate designs and the realistic CGI, which are enjoyable to look at, it is nothing but an incredibly lazy attempt at TV-making.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because you're a mongoloid that is blinded by nostalgia and has no knowledge on how dinosaurs actually acted

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      WWD had shit animation, but at least it actually made an effort.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        WWD had amazing animation, but it's 25 years old now and shows its age

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because PP was made by stupid featherfags exercising their cartoon dinosaur fetish, while WWD was an attempt to make a good Dinosaur documentary.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Why pic related is so boring and uninteresting
    Not enough feathers

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Music wasn’t as memorable.
    Dinosaur calls weren’t memorable or iconic.
    We don’t follow any individual creatures for a life cycle or have any narrative to make the dinosaurs feel grounded.
    In my opinion, the filmography was too “bombastic “ with drone style footage and shots that are too perfect for me to feel like it’s actually captured footage from a camera man, which makes it feel way less real to me.
    The animations and movement of the dinosaurs didn’t feel as realistic as WWD, it falls into the “over animated” bracket to me. Movements are too smooth and wiggly. I think the most realistic looking and best animated creature in the show was the Bezelbufo frog.
    I also wasn’t a fan of the narration. the voice acting was fine, but the words didn’t really explain much or go into many details.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      WWD assumed its audience was intelligent, PP assumes you're a child

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        PP assumes you're reddit. Unfortunately, for a large swath of the population, PP was right.

        WWD had amazing animation, but it's 25 years old now and shows its age

        Actually, a lot of it was sort of bizarre even for the time.

        https://i.imgur.com/g4TuUaz.jpg

        >citing encyclopedia dramatica

        >this fucking retard doesn't know about the wikipedos

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Its the format that makes Prehistoric Planet inferior for me. WWD had a narrative format focusing on one individual as it went about its day. Throughout the episode, we are introduced to other species by the individual's interactions with it. Prehistoric Planet is too disjointed. It just jumps from one animal to another.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's Planet Earth with cgi dinosaurs. There's no compelling narrative or worldbuilding, just a clip show.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You were a kid then and now you're an adult?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Doesn't change the fact that it is an overrated documentary, it isn't as epic and cinematographic as WWD. Dinosaurs aren't cool extinct beasts anymore, now they need to looks bad and behave exactly the opposite as they used to in older medias. I don't want to see a large theropod doing a bird-like mating dance, it isn't scientifically accurate anyway, just pure speculation.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You're upset they're portraying animals like animals?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Dinosaurs were reptiles, like lizard's and snakes

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Birds are reptiles too.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              They are warmblooded and don't have scales and lay hard eggs.... Not Reptiles

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                retard alert

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >They are warmblooded
                So were dinosaurs
                >don't have scales
                Yes they do
                >lay hard eggs
                So do crocodiles and dinosaurs

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Barinasuchus laid hard eggs and was also warmblooded. Does that not make it a reptile?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Either birds are reptiles or crocodiles are birds.
                Which one is it buddy?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You could have stopped at warm-blooded.

                >They are warmblooded
                So were dinosaurs
                >don't have scales
                Yes they do
                >lay hard eggs
                So do crocodiles and dinosaurs

                >So were dinosaurs
                Nope. Not unless Leatherback Sea Turtles are also.

                https://i.imgur.com/Z27qjx1.jpg

                Barinasuchus laid hard eggs and was also warmblooded. Does that not make it a reptile?

                >and was also warmblooded
                The hell is wrong with you pop sci paleoretards just claiming random wrong shit and never backing down?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You could have stopped at warm-blooded.

                [...]
                >So were dinosaurs
                Nope. Not unless Leatherback Sea Turtles are also.

                [...]
                >and was also warmblooded
                The hell is wrong with you pop sci paleoretards just claiming random wrong shit and never backing down?

                >https://us.cnn.com/2022/05/25/world/dinosaur-blood-warm-cold-scn/index.html

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No.

                https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1253143

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Why use science.org in 2014 when they agree with cnn.com in 2022?
                https://www.science.org/content/article/were-dinosaurs-warm-blooded-new-study-says-yes

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're just wrong because the dinosaur renaissance was wrong. You're just an NPC so you lack any ability to discern truth from falsehood. Dinosaurs are reptiles, not mammal-like birds. And they're never going to stop being, regardless of how much you want them to be something else.

                https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms9296

                https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aax9361

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Birds are reptiles.
                Also, lol

                >Inferred ancestral states reveal that the metabolic rates consistent with endothermy evolved independently in mammals and plesiosaurs, and are ancestral to ornithodirans, with increasing rates along the avian lineage.
                >High metabolic rates were acquired in pterosaurs, ornithischians, sauropods and theropods well before the advent of energetically costly adaptations, such as flight in birds.
                >Giant sauropods and theropods were not gigantothermic but true endotherms.

                Click the second link in

                Why use science.org in 2014 when they agree with cnn.com in 2022?
                https://www.science.org/content/article/were-dinosaurs-warm-blooded-new-study-says-yes

                I can't post the actual nature.com link cause Wauf thinks its a social security number or something.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No. Birds are birds. Reptiles aren't warm-blooded.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >infer
                I'm gonna stop you right there. There is something that modern soientismists need to get through their fucking heads: inference is not science. NOPE. You can bitch and whine all you want, but guessing shit isn't science. That's not how the scientific method works. Never has been. Never gonna be. If you use inference you are not doing science.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >"scientific method" on wikipedia
                >CTRL F "infer"
                >18 results
                >all saying inference is part of the scientific method
                You spend so much time lying it's hard to tell if you're a clown character or not.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No. You lose. That's not science. And wikipedo is literally run by pedophile garden gnomes. This has been known for 20 years.

                https://encyclopediadramatica.online/The_Wikipedia_garden gnomes

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >citing encyclopedia dramatica

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Do you ever get tired of losing these threads?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Agree with CNN in current year

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Dinos are more closely related to birds and crocs than lizards and snakes.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Birds aren't reptiles though and most dinosaurs have about as much in common with them as a capybara.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Birds aren't reptiles just like how platypuses aren't mammals

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Except platypuses are mammals and birds are birds.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Except platypuses are mammals and birds are dinosaurs
                ftfy

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Uh, sorry, I don't talk to fish. Go glub glub in the ocean with your kind.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Birds aren't reptiles though and most dinosaurs have about as much in common with them as a capybara.
                stupid creationist

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >it isn't scientifically accurate anyway

        A scientifically accurate dinosaur is a fucking skeleton you dumbass.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >A scientifically accurate dinosaur is a fucking skeleton you dumbass.
          or a 4 piece with biscuit

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Awwwwwwwwww too bad you'll never be able to go back in time like me :*~~)

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Anon didn't think scientifically accurate Velociraptors using their feathers to break their fall as they literally jump off cliffs to hunt was epic?

        Yeah ok buddy.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        PP isn't a documentary at all. It's a shitty Pixar cartoon.

        You're upset they're portraying animals like animals?

        Pic related.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Its the format that makes Prehistoric Planet inferior for me. WWD had a narrative format focusing on one individual as it went about its day. Throughout the episode, we are introduced to other species by the individual's interactions with it. Prehistoric Planet is too disjointed. It just jumps from one animal to another.

        https://i.imgur.com/dSf1V92.jpg

        Because PP was made by stupid featherfags exercising their cartoon dinosaur fetish, while WWD was an attempt to make a good Dinosaur documentary.

        https://i.imgur.com/zmGE82d.jpg

        PP isn't a documentary at all. It's a shitty Pixar cartoon.

        [...]
        Pic related.

        Did any of you watch Planet Earth or Blue Planet?
        Do you guys even like animals?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Oh I watched the piece of shit, just like I watched Lawd dem rangs. For the trainwreck factor. Sauropods don't have cankles. I'm sorry you're retarded.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          loved your mom, babe.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *