>ITT: 30yr olds still argue about their HECKIN FAVORITE gay discount fossil-dragons that nobody cares about anymore
Can't wait for dinoschizo threads to inevitably become 2 week long bans in the future, alongside cat v. dog console wars.
>the closest thing to a feather in 80m BC was little more than fuzz?
Birds have been around longer than 80 million years man. Even archaeopteryx is nearly twice that age
None of those are plaster. They are all 100% real, complete, and mostly articulated. That's why I chose them. Maybe if you were as educated as me, you would know that :^)
>died over 120 million years ago >99+% complete skeleton in perfectly articulated lifelike pose >madam butterfly actually believes that
Have you seen their histology under a microscope to guarantee their authenticity?
For one of them, yes. If you're claiming something is fake, you need to actually provide evidence for your claim. You can't and that's why you've lost the argument. Maybe if you were as masculine as me, you wouldn't have lost :^)
I cant prove Santa is fake. I can however assert that he does not exist because no one has given irrefutable evidence that Santa exists in the first place. Those fossils objectively exist, and you are making the claim that they are fake. You are a bitter little incel contrarian, so you are unable to provide evidence for your claims. You lose. Maybe if you were educated like me you wouldn't humiliate yourself so badly.
I cant prove your plaster sculptures are plaster. I can however assert that they are fake because communists are compulsive liars.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Not an argument. Most of those specimens aren't from China. I accept your concession.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>I can't prove its wrong or fake because other people lie and aslo communism
next you'll call him a chud, right?
10 months ago
Anonymous
>all of those feathers on animals that probably didnt have any
i hope we can move on from this dumb popsci trend soon
10 months ago
Anonymous
We will. Truth is already winning. That's why the featherfags are getting so histrionic and desperate. The more propaganda a movement puts out, the more they're dying. Prehistoric Planet is a perfect example of this. Another is america's constant stream of psyops we're having to put up with every god damned day of our lives at this point.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Is that why your post just got deleted on a board on one of the most free speech tolerant and open ended websites in the world?
You will never be anything other than a lunatic that is laughed off by scientists. Please know your place. You already lost
10 months ago
Anonymous
Wauf doesn't have free speech. I don't know what the fuck you think you're talking about. And with recent chud jannies, it's basically reddit. As for knowing my place, your entire NPC cadre's necks will be reminded.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Any day now.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>america's constant stream of psyops we're having to put up with every god damned day of our lives at this point.
I'm glad I'm not schizophrenic. It sounds hellish. You really should just take the meds so the daily psyops stop.
10 months ago
Anonymous
It already has for the most part. That art is years old from right in the middle of the feathered rex trend
10 months ago
Anonymous
Oh how I wish you were right. No, I'm afraid all paleoartists are still shoving feathers on things that have no business with them. And that's still the norm. Even now it is the exception to see a Tyrannosaurus with zero feathers, not the norm.
>america's constant stream of psyops we're having to put up with every god damned day of our lives at this point.
I'm glad I'm not schizophrenic. It sounds hellish. You really should just take the meds so the daily psyops stop.
NPCs like you are the reason we have to live in a third world hellscape.
10 months ago
Anonymous
you're the only one living in a third world hellscape, gay
You're not the only conscious person in the world. You're just a crazy person that thinks he is.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>America's doing great >I'm an intelligent, conscious person btw
10 months ago
Anonymous
>I can't afford rent on the waterfront in San Francisco >US is going DOWN!
kek you're a fucking retard.
are you from russia or something? Maybe you're from china?
10 months ago
Anonymous
Well, you've betrayed your NPChood previously. Now you've also revealed you're dangerously out of touch with reality and a servant of the evil empire.
Just racking up the credibility wins here.
10 months ago
Anonymous
You think everyone that disagrees with you is the same person. It's probably your most entertaining bit. Sometimes I just point out how stupid and wrong you are and then sit back for 48 hours and watch you attack anyone that dares speak to you. Your passion is admirable, your tilting at windmills is just funny.
10 months ago
Anonymous
No, retard, that's your tactic. I have noticed though that you pull of the NPC repeat-projection trick with a bit more frequency that I would be comfortable with from MOST NPCs though. Your NPC levels are troublingly high. This can only mean you're lying on purpose, not too stupid to understand the truth being discussed. This level of NPC can only manifest from intense cognitive dissonance.
why does every single fucking thread about dinosaurs devolves in a discussion about feathers and transexuals. I'm convinced it's the same two mentally ill people spamming every single thread
paranoia and an inability to understand and regulate one's own negative emotions, needing to project them on a simplistic and easy to process target >my life was good as a child and liked the lizardy t-rex >my life sucks now and the t-rex is chonky >the t-rex being chonky must be part of a plan by (them) to make my life suck
You retards do it on live TV and as professional journalists. And university professors. And rich politicians born into affluence. And common factory workers and star bucks cucks.
>everyone is crazy like me >in fact I'm not crazy at all
sorry bud, you're actually crazy. Hanging out with other crazy people doesn't make you normal.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Oh wow TIL I was crazy and therefore all my arguments are invalid. Time to get the clot shot. Drumpf lost, sweaty!
>believes the NPC meme >also a braindead 4chancel
kys newfag
>Personifies the NPC meme >Tries to deny it while unironically proving it's true
You know, I'm getting a little tired of having to congratulate you every thread.
so dino doctors are going full circle and just taking their evidence from monster hunter? thats just a deviljho
Pretty much yeah. All dino pop culture these days is based on gibberish and nonsense.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>I was crazy and therefore all my arguments are invalid.
I mean it's true.
you might have some lucid arguments, but they're certainly not about feathers or dinosaurs.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Yes, you're right. I'm now going to commit myself to a mental institution for disagreeing with you and academia and *checks notes* reading papers and being aware of the serious problems in modern science.
>you might have some lucid arguments
ALL of my arguments are lucid. The only ones of yours which are are when you stop for a second to recognize I'm right. This isn't an ego thing either. You're just so consistently wrong about everything that you're only hope of being right is to agree with your opponents.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>ALL of my arguments are lucid
so china faked all feathered fossils and american scientists are in on it and it's all a conspiracy to turn kids gay?
I mean you're legit psychotic. These are not lucid arguments or even interesting ones.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>so china faked all feathered fossils and american scientists are in on it
YES.
>and it's all a conspiracy to turn kids gay?
The number of times you bring up homosexuality makes me think your problem is a lack of penis.
>That's pretty fucking suHispanicious
there's the paranoia
There is literally nothing wrong with paranoia.
10 months ago
Anonymous
the paranoia is a classic symptom of your schizophrenia
as I'm sure you've been told, but probably don't realize because you don't think you're paranoid.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Since you're a tele-health official, can you write me up a prescription for expensive pain killers?
10 months ago
Anonymous
I wonder how long you realize you lost this thread as well before you turn it into a pathetic posturing match about whose the more deluded because you ultimately have no argument and no evidence.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>There is literally nothing wrong with paranoia.
It's not paranoia until it is a problem, tho. That's what makes something a mental illness, when it is not allowing you to successfully function in society.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Communists always try to claim anyone disagreeing with them is "mentally ill".
>ITT: 30yr olds still argue about their HECKIN FAVORITE gay discount fossil-dragons that nobody cares about anymore
Can't wait for dinoschizo threads to inevitably become 2 week long bans in the future, alongside cat v. dog console wars.
Dinosaurs will always be more relevant than you realize.
Yeah it's fucking retarded. Scale vs Feather shit should be an instant ban. It's been going on for over a decade and it was never good.
Fuck off, NPC gay. Go post more furry porn, since that's what you think this board is for.
10 months ago
Anonymous
But I thought dinosaurs weren't real, remember? Did wittwe babies brain get fried when he changed the topic to watered-down 4chan?
10 months ago
Anonymous
>But I thought dinosaurs weren't real, remember?
I've never said that.
>BUT EVERYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH ME IS ONE PERSON!!!!!
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
I see one escaped it's containment board again?
[...]
Again, EXTREMELY suHispanicious you targeted the apple post and are screaming about 4chan.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>"extrewmey supichus"
KEK!
10 months ago
Anonymous
>(You): all dees fossiws awe FAEK! >also (You): i nebew sed dat
I assume you were only pretending to be retarded, hm?
10 months ago
Anonymous
https://i.imgur.com/nkbVll9.jpg
>"extrewmey supichus"
KEK!
samefag
10 months ago
Anonymous
Oh hey, ya don't say, what gave it away?
10 months ago
Anonymous
>so china faked all feathered fossils and american scientists are in on it
YES.
>and it's all a conspiracy to turn kids gay?
The number of times you bring up homosexuality makes me think your problem is a lack of penis.
[...]
There is literally nothing wrong with paranoia.
>appletv
Why would you say it like that? Why not just say apple? That's pretty fucking suHispanicious.
Yes, you're right. I'm now going to commit myself to a mental institution for disagreeing with you and academia and *checks notes* reading papers and being aware of the serious problems in modern science.
>you might have some lucid arguments
ALL of my arguments are lucid. The only ones of yours which are are when you stop for a second to recognize I'm right. This isn't an ego thing either. You're just so consistently wrong about everything that you're only hope of being right is to agree with your opponents.
Oh wow TIL I was crazy and therefore all my arguments are invalid. Time to get the clot shot. Drumpf lost, sweaty!
[...] >Personifies the NPC meme >Tries to deny it while unironically proving it's true
You know, I'm getting a little tired of having to congratulate you every thread.
[...]
Pretty much yeah. All dino pop culture these days is based on gibberish and nonsense.
Actually PP had "real" paleontologists on the crew. Unfortunately, they were all feathergay retards of the sort that publish nonsense and spread contrarian Dinosaur specart bullshit to the goyim.
On a related note, why does modern "science" keep claiming bears are also so hilariously fat? They look like furry sausages. I think they just want to make anything cool look sissy because of gnomish propaganda.
>I think they just want to make anything cool look sissy because of gnomish propaganda.
to a man with a hammer, everything is a nail
you should try getting a job and not being a parasite on our welfare system and you'll realize garden gnomes don't control shit. Your boss Maria does, and she's not a fucking garden gnome.
Just look at this, do you really think apex predators would look this cuddly? The media and deep state is brainwashing us trying to delete any sign of masculinity and toughness and make us obedient. Open your eyes!
>The media and deep state is brainwashing us trying to delete any sign of masculinity and toughness and make us obedient
not sure if ironic shitposting, but in case anon missed the point
maria is the real problem anon has, not Schlomo. Women are better educated than that guy, better employed, more antagonistic to men, and more accepting of other men of different cultures and ethnicities.
anon complains of garden gnomes when gnomish men are just as fed up with women as he is.
. >Who you calling a sissy, bitch?
Lots of shit is anthopomorphised because our culture is being infantilised. Bears do get fat, but they are still terrifying as fuck
>Bears do get fat, but they are still terrifying as fuck
Same with T-rex
It having some actual muscle on it's bones is still going to do absolutely nothing about it's signature predator gaze above a massive pair of jaws
Part of the problem is proving that they're real requires a lot more education than anon is willing or able to absorb.
One of the interesting things I ran into early in my dinosaur career is the occipital condyle. Like coming out of high school they don't really tell you that mammals have 2 occipital condyles while reptiles only have 1. So I didn't know how to look at a single bone and tell if it was a mammal or a reptile if I didn't have any other context. But you start learning the differences and suddenly you can tell just by looking at a bone if it came from a mammal or a reptile or an amphibian or a fish. The more you learn the better your ability to spot truth.
After a while the idea of faking all these little differences that the schizo doesn't even know becomes ridiculous. Like if we're just fooling a bunch of high school educated creationists, we don't need to concern ourselves with the 5th trochanter or the ascending process of the astragalus. But those details are present even though the schizo doesn't know what they mean. Which is a convincing argument against fakery. Just not one he's smart enough to understand.
anyone that has studied dinosaur anatomy to the level of being able to ID dino bones by sight has also dug dinosaurs out of the ground and ID'd them. They already know the bones are real and came from dinosaurs because they came directly out of the rock and there's nothing else in the entire world like them.
>Why not deal with living animals at this point
paleontologists spend close to a decade studying living animals, including humans. That's how we learn to ID dead ones.
>Like, the guys who started it. I dare you to look into it.
gideon mantel, william buckland, and richard owen? Those nefarious scallywags
seething lol.
never any valid arguments.
no convincing evidence ever posted.
no sources to anything. >"L-look at these bing images I found" >"It's r-real you s-science denier! I was told on good authority! REEEEEE"
I guess your trolling is getting too many responses to keep up with.
but if you get time, please answer this
No, I was honestly curious if you meant the people that started dinosaur paleontology like Mantell, Buckland, Owen, and Cuvier
because I'm guessing you actually meant Cope and Marsh because you never "researched" a dang thing.
I am genuinely curious what your complaints are with these characters.
Cope and Marsh didn't start dinosaur paleontology by any stretch of the imagination, but their methods could certainly be criticized. The funny thing is neither of them is particularly famous in science for their paleontology. They were much more successful zoologists and ecologists than paleontologists. Both produced bodies of work that have nothing to do with dinosaurs.
Not him, but a large source of this current pulse of dinosaur denying schizos is a series of youtube videos by a flat earther named Eric Dubay. In his videos, Dubay made major error by confusing the first dinosaur ever described from America by Leidy with the first Dinosaur ever described. With his timeline now fucked up, Dubay asserted that Richard Owen coined the term Dinosauria out of necessity for the concept of evolution without any dinosaur ever actually being discovered.
If anon did read up on why Owen coined the term he might be shocked by the elegance and brilliance of his discovery. The dude seriously was a genius, and what he discovered is still amazing today. Also the source of all the feather debates Wauf loves so much.
>Giant chicken
That Giant chicken has teeth, a tail and is 30 feet long lol
>Drawing
Nope! Sinortnithosaurus, you can go see it on display in China.
>Schizo
It is a 95% complete skeleton. Educated people (read: not you) can determine what a bone is and where it goes, even if it isn't totally articulated.
>Bird
Birds don't have tails
>Plaaster
Nope. Neither of those are made out of plaster, stupid child.
>Turtle
Why does that turtle have no shell, teeth, and a long neck? Why are you still in this thread eve though you've been humilated?
>Show me proof
I've shown you proof, now the burden is on you to show why these things are fake.
>Some of them are full blown plaster
They are not. Thats why I specifically chose them. Because they are 100% real, mostly articulated, and publicly displayed for you to independently verify.
>Cassowary
Damn look at that cassowary skull
You are not a serious person. You lose :^)
. You acknowledged it was real, but was probably a large bird like a cassowary. Are you still willing to say that?
>no argument except "lol" >this is the average calibre of dinosaurlets
Nice one champ, you're a shining intellectual. The Cassowary and other birds like it literally looks like those "dinosaur" bones. The feet look exactly like T-Rex feet. Why did "scientists" start moving dinosaurs closer and closer to looking like birds?
>Giant chicken
That Giant chicken has teeth, a tail and is 30 feet long lol
>Drawing
Nope! Sinortnithosaurus, you can go see it on display in China.
>Schizo
It is a 95% complete skeleton. Educated people (read: not you) can determine what a bone is and where it goes, even if it isn't totally articulated.
>Bird
Birds don't have tails
>Plaaster
Nope. Neither of those are made out of plaster, stupid child.
>Turtle
Why does that turtle have no shell, teeth, and a long neck? Why are you still in this thread eve though you've been humilated?
>Show me proof
I've shown you proof, now the burden is on you to show why these things are fake.
>Some of them are full blown plaster
They are not. Thats why I specifically chose them. Because they are 100% real, mostly articulated, and publicly displayed for you to independently verify.
LMFAO. Pic related. Nice bird that may have existed a few thousand years ago.
Still waiting on proof of these giant lizards like T-Rex that existed millions of years ago.
Again I'll reiterate, any real skeletons are that of animals that are related to those that we know to exist. Birds are not lizards. There are and were huge or giant bird species that existed.
The pantheon of *giant lizards* that are fabricated based on bone fragments or a couple large bones is what I'm calling fake, because they are.
Lmfao you could only respond to a single point thats how completely fucking bankrupt you are you pathetic fucking joke. How do you have enough cognitive dissonance to convince yourself that you should keep arguing when its immediately evident that you cant even respond to 8/10 examples? Know your place when speaking to your betters.
Disprove what???? That they *might* be fake??? That is a claim that YOU are making and YOU need to provide evidence for. You can't. Fucking loser, get out of my sight.
I accept your concession. Know your place when speaking to your betters, child. Maybe if you were actually educated like me you wouldn't embarrass yourself so thoroughly :^)
10 months ago
Anonymous
Dinosaurfags are the biggest fucking losers on the planet
T. Palaeontologist
Prove me wrong. Lets see a full skeleton, champ. I'll be waiting for links. If you look into it you will find that I'm correct on every point. Most of the "skeletons" are how fag scientists IMAGINED them to look, and they base it off bone fragments or as few as one bone. That's literally the science.
Still don't believe me? Why has the look of dinosaurs shifted so much over the years? Go back and look at what they first said they looked like when they first invented dinosaurs. Then look at how they looked in the 60's, 70's, 80's and 90's.
20 years ago they were scaled. Oh, no they're feathered. Ayo hol' up, maybe they weren't feathered. Lmao. Have fun believing this money laundering psyop, retard.
What about that home depot dolly with the shotgun attached to it that they use to send images of fossils back to the computer screen? Did the paleontologists plant the remains there and stage the whole thing?
>Including obviously plaster bones in your highlight
KEK.
https://i.imgur.com/K2yQEzp.jpg
Your claims fall flat at the press of a button. Take your meds. >Verification not required.
>uses an image from a movie to defend his point
LMAO. Can't make this shit up. I guess it's fitting in a way, the dinosaur hoax is like a movie script.
I asked for images of full skeletons, and just like I said, neither of you could. You give me a picture of a statue of a "dinosaur" with 95% fake bones, and a few large bones on there, which as I said come from large versions/species of existing animals. Those bones could be arranged in a hundred different ways with new fake bones added to create all kinds of creatures, and you'd probably believe every single one if the scientists told you to.
Dinosaurs are not real. All they have are literal bone fragments, and a few large bones. No complete skeletons.
Those skeletons you see in museums have like 1-2 real bones on them, the rest came from the headcanon of some faggy scientist.
Prove me wrong. Lets see a full skeleton, champ. I'll be waiting for links. If you look into it you will find that I'm correct on every point. Most of the "skeletons" are how fag scientists IMAGINED them to look, and they base it off bone fragments or as few as one bone. That's literally the science.
Still don't believe me? Why has the look of dinosaurs shifted so much over the years? Go back and look at what they first said they looked like when they first invented dinosaurs. Then look at how they looked in the 60's, 70's, 80's and 90's.
20 years ago they were scaled. Oh, no they're feathered. Ayo hol' up, maybe they weren't feathered. Lmao. Have fun believing this money laundering psyop, retard.
Nope! That's not how this works. I have demonstrated that these skeletons exist. You're the one making the claim that it is fake/plaster. The burden of proof is on you. If you cannot demonstrate that it is fake, then I accept your concession :^)
You didn't actually. There's no proof any of those images posted in this thread are actually real bones. You posted IMAGES. Where's the sources? Articles with information? Where's info about where they were found, and how many of the bones are real? Are any of the ones you posted real at all? Are they plaster sculptures of a "real" dinosaur? Any link to trustworthy info about the validity of these skeletons? Or did you just search "realest dinosaur skeleton" on google images? (You did).
Did you have images of how they looked at the "dig site"?
What we can know for sure is that there are thousands of plaster sculptures with a few fragments or whole pieces of alleged "dinosaur" bones chucked on.
Do either of you know what "appeal to authority" is?
Have either of you ever questioned how many hundreds of millions has gone into dinosaur paleontology? (incentive to lie)
Have either of you ever researched how dinosaur paleontology started? Like, the guys who started it. I dare you to look into it.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>Like, the guys who started it. I dare you to look into it.
gideon mantel, william buckland, and richard owen? Those nefarious scallywags
10 months ago
Anonymous
Nope! That's not how this works. I have demonstrated that these skeletons exist. You're the one making the claim that it is fake/plaster. The burden of proof is on you. If you cannot demonstrate that it is fake, then I accept your concession :^)
10 months ago
Anonymous
>I can't be duped because I think everything is fake >prove me wrong
kek
10 months ago
Anonymous
Anon you can think anything is fake that you want, you just can't be expected to be taken seriously if you have no evidence.
10 months ago
Anonymous
You've got your work cut out for you proving everything that is real though? Chop chop
10 months ago
Anonymous
I accept your concession :^)
[...]
You didn't actually. There's no proof any of those images posted in this thread are actually real bones. You posted IMAGES. Where's the sources? Articles with information? Where's info about where they were found, and how many of the bones are real? Are any of the ones you posted real at all? Are they plaster sculptures of a "real" dinosaur? Any link to trustworthy info about the validity of these skeletons? Or did you just search "realest dinosaur skeleton" on google images? (You did).
Did you have images of how they looked at the "dig site"?
What we can know for sure is that there are thousands of plaster sculptures with a few fragments or whole pieces of alleged "dinosaur" bones chucked on.
Do either of you know what "appeal to authority" is?
Have either of you ever questioned how many hundreds of millions has gone into dinosaur paleontology? (incentive to lie)
Have either of you ever researched how dinosaur paleontology started? Like, the guys who started it. I dare you to look into it.
>Or did you just search "realest dinosaur skeleton" on google images? (You did).
No, I selected examples of fossils that I've come across that I know to be complete, fully or mostly articulated, and on public display. About half of them are pieces I have seen in person.
>Where's the sources?
https://web.archive.org/web/20120417134949/http://www.xinglida.net/pdf/Xu_et_al_2012_Yutyrannus.pdf
For the Yutyrannus. I'll provide publications on each fossil I posted at your request.
>Any link to trustworthy info
I highly doubt there is any academic organization that would be credible to you, fucking raving lunatic schizo failure
>What we can know for sure is that there are thousands of plaster sculptures with a few fragments or whole pieces of alleged "dinosaur" bones chucked on.
Yes scientists tend to not like it when steel rods are drilled into the bones they spent years excavating to be dangled in front of gaping crowds. The real bones are kept in the back, and the museums will even show you if you ask nicely. Not that you would put that much effort into your lunatic ramblings.
Every dinosaur you have ever heard of is known from dozens of partial skeletons and usually a couple >90% complete specimens. I can provide citations for each famous genus on request.
>Do either of you know what "appeal to authority" is?
Yes. You made one here: >Any link to trustworthy info about the validity of these skeletons
>Have either of you ever questioned how many hundreds of millions has gone into dinosaur paleontology?
Are you under the impression that paleontologists are wealthy people? roflmao
>Like, the guys who started it. I dare you to look into it.
What exactly did you learn in a youtube video essay that you think I don't know? Be specific. You've been barely managing to stay above water by using vague arguments and no specific examples. Everyone sees what you are, worthless lunatic freak.
It's a disinfo agent. As usual, it's malice, not incompetence.
How accurate is the ~~*science*~~ when it comes to dinosaurs?
That all depends on what you’re asking. Are you asking about the mainstream narrative? Because that’s batshit bonkers. Or are you asking about the actual fossil evidence and rarely heard good paleontology? Right now the entire field is basically deviantart tier. I wouldn’t put much stock in anything published on Dinosaurs in the past 30 years. There are still discoveries and good details mentioned that aren’t heard about. The mesothermy study I often mention should have had a larger sample size species wise, but other than that it pretty much puts to bed the view that Dinosaurs were warm-blooded - in fact the supposedly feathered dinosaurs are some of the MOST cold-blooded. But you won’t hear about that in the news, because that’s actual science. Now all these fucking retarded “theories” like “scales come from feathers” or “feathers are an ancestral dinosaur trait” or “Ornithoscelida is real!” or Nick Longrich’s retarded fucking paper trying to cope Torosaurus into not being Triceratops where he claims that an animal with a 9’ long skull is a “juvenile” and that he can sex dinosaurs (nobody can) - the bullshit you hear the most about, that’s shit grade paleontology, and most of it isn’t science at all. But that’s the shit that gets pop star level recognition and taints the entire field. The gays have control of paleontology now and they have successfully convinced the majority of the population that all the clearly wrong, contrarian “theories” about Dinosaurs are self-evident actually. Then when they’re confronted about it, they try to cringe and cower and deny all responsibility as if this problem created itself somehow.
Yep. Whatever academia can do to subvert. And the reason is EVERYTHING must be subverted in society or the goblins in control lose power. Any chink in the armor causes the entire farce to collapse. Truth anywhere is a threat to their goals everywhere.
Dinosaurs are not real. All they have are literal bone fragments, and a few large bones. No complete skeletons.
Those skeletons you see in museums have like 1-2 real bones on them, the rest came from the headcanon of some faggy scientist.
It’s kind of amazing that glowmorons care so much about paleontology, probably because the amount of autists Dinosaurs attract poses a “noticing” threat. This “DINOSAURS AREN’T REAL! LOOKAMEEEEE‼!” bullshit is exactly like the “SPACE IS FAKE AND THE EARTH IS FLAT‼!” propaganda that starts appearing when you mention NASA’s long history of fraud.
What are you gays complaining about now? Have you ever seen a Tyrannosaurus fossil up close? They're bulky fuckers with barrel shaped torsos. They have thick leg bones and long tails.
The latest renditions look great. My personal favorite is the green one from Prehistoric Planet, green being the objectively best color for a Tyrannosaurus.
Archeologists are hacks, they probably just found some incomplete skeleton of a sick specimen and spun some fairy tale to secure more grants for their hare-brained useless profession.
Not him, but it's true though. Even the smallest difference between specimens has the team behind the discovery publishing paper after paper about it being a new species.
Looking at him I wonder how he was even able to chase his prey yet walk properly. He's built like a hippo but 2 legs supporting this mountain of meat instead of 4.
>He's built like a hippo
A hippo's top running speed is 30 km/h.
Unless you are an athlete runner, a hippo WILL outrun you if you.
You know why?
Because a hippo looks like this under 5 cm of skin.
>He's built like a hippo
A hippo's top running speed is 30 km/h.
Unless you are an athlete runner, a hippo WILL outrun you if you.
You know why?
Because a hippo looks like this under 5 cm of skin.
T-rex also had hollow bones, They are not as dense as elephants.
Being a round boi seems like a solid defensive shape for t rex to have. Fewer sharp angles for an opposing rex to get an impactful or tearing bite into and a more deflective shape for matchups against ankylosaurs, pachycephalosaurs and triceratops (especially for juvenile rexes).
I have this theory that theropods use their front limbs to grab each other's torso when they're fighting, like komodos. But T. rex opted for small front limbs and bit each other on the face instead (hence the numerous bite marks on the Rex skulls found). The bulky torso might be helpful to push rivals around.
It's often theorized it's for sex, since carnotaurus's arms are even smaller, yet these limbs were still quite strong, having the same purpose as pelvic spurs on pythons
I’m no expert, but aren’t large predators generally kinda fat? Bears, tigers, crocs, etc seem a bit fat, so I think a t-rex would be a little fat, though maybe not quite as much as that pic.
That's not realistic musculature. Bulging limbs just make you feel like you'd let T rex fuck you. But look at that fucking neck. Is that a neck that rips and tears? No. That's a neck with more human proportions that I think you just like for reasons already mentioned. What about all the torso muscles that help balance those huge limbs? Realistically animals, especially carnivores, have a shitton of core and neck strength that almost dwarfs their limbs. It also needs huge guts to power its killing sprees and hold the shredded flesh of the slain. That would make it a little fatter.
And here you are bitching about T rex getting more muscles and enhancements that make it a better killing machine because it draws it away from proportions you associate with sexual imagery and closer to an actual lizard. And yet, it is still, you know, a fucking lizard.
I'd argue that Jurassic Park's T-Rex was malnourished, all they fed it was a goat, this is a creature that could eat a triceratops
All things considered that T-rex was pretty chill and well mannered considering it might be starving. Even polar bears stop giving a shit about people when they're full, problem is they're never full.
Probably not. It always irks me when midwits try to find a function for a vestigial appendage. It's like they can't grasp that it takes time for an organ to disappear from a lineage.
https://i.imgur.com/NI1c1hz.jpg
to be fair you can't post a skeleton on the internet.
you also can't post a drawing
you might be able to post an image of a skeleton or a drawing.
I heard there was a picture of a skeleton on the darkweb.
[...]
Part of the problem is proving that they're real requires a lot more education than anon is willing or able to absorb.
One of the interesting things I ran into early in my dinosaur career is the occipital condyle. Like coming out of high school they don't really tell you that mammals have 2 occipital condyles while reptiles only have 1. So I didn't know how to look at a single bone and tell if it was a mammal or a reptile if I didn't have any other context. But you start learning the differences and suddenly you can tell just by looking at a bone if it came from a mammal or a reptile or an amphibian or a fish. The more you learn the better your ability to spot truth.
After a while the idea of faking all these little differences that the schizo doesn't even know becomes ridiculous. Like if we're just fooling a bunch of high school educated creationists, we don't need to concern ourselves with the 5th trochanter or the ascending process of the astragalus. But those details are present even though the schizo doesn't know what they mean. Which is a convincing argument against fakery. Just not one he's smart enough to understand.
And yet, they keep happening and your dumb asses keep falling for it, handwaving it away when you get caught, then pretending you've never been wrong. It's easy to bat 1000 if ignore all your strike outs, try to get everyone fired that mentions them, then tell the news reporters you've never missed a ball.
NOW i remember why i fucking hate this board after 2017 again. i sincerely hope you all get lethal injection
And how would it go if you were in charge?
>ITT: 30yr olds still argue about their HECKIN FAVORITE gay discount fossil-dragons that nobody cares about anymore
Can't wait for dinoschizo threads to inevitably become 2 week long bans in the future, alongside cat v. dog console wars.
Yeah it's fucking retarded. Scale vs Feather shit should be an instant ban. It's been going on for over a decade and it was never good.
so dino doctors are going full circle and just taking their evidence from monster hunter? thats just a deviljho
I love dinos so much, bros. They are cool and bring me peace.
>that hair
Have they finally realize the closest thing to a feather in 80m BC was little more than fuzz?
Took them more than 15 years, dang.
T. rex didn't have that either. Only scales. It's the last desperate gasp of the featherfags.
piss off paleoschizo
Die in a cometary impact, paleoNPC.
>the closest thing to a feather in 80m BC was little more than fuzz?
Birds have been around longer than 80 million years man. Even archaeopteryx is nearly twice that age
Ah, sorry, I meant for t-rex side of theras.
Yutyrannus
>My board
Lmfao how have you not been banned yet?
He's been banned hundreds of times.
He'll be banned hundreds more.
Tell me where the evil bad reddit touched you
My asshole. I don't like my poo-poo place touched by literal pedophiles.
>my board
>literally everyone here hates you
Do you ever get tired of losing arguments? IS that why you've come up with this unhinged cope about appletv being out to get you?
>Be NPC
>Lie tirelessly for your masters on the internet
>Get BTFO constantly
>Claim victory
>"Gloat"
Retard
Watch out anon! The ghost of Steve Jobs is right behind you and he’s wearing a feathered dinosaur costume!
Don't be silly, steve jobs is burning in hell for all of eternity.
>appletv
Why would you say it like that? Why not just say apple? That's pretty fucking suHispanicious.
>That's pretty fucking suHispanicious
there's the paranoia
holy shit stop posting
Because the paleo artist trannies that draw them are bunch of lard asses themselves. It’s all about projection with these people.
what's the point of these stupid hands
fat acceptance groups trying to push their degeneracy onto kids. the next jurassic world movie is gonna have fat dinosaurs.
thread ruined by a schitzo and the anons falling for what i hope it bait
He played League of legends
None of those are plaster. They are all 100% real, complete, and mostly articulated. That's why I chose them. Maybe if you were as educated as me, you would know that :^)
>died over 120 million years ago
>99+% complete skeleton in perfectly articulated lifelike pose
>madam butterfly actually believes that
Have you seen their histology under a microscope to guarantee their authenticity?
For one of them, yes. If you're claiming something is fake, you need to actually provide evidence for your claim. You can't and that's why you've lost the argument. Maybe if you were as masculine as me, you wouldn't have lost :^)
Yeah, prove Santa is fake.
I cant prove Santa is fake. I can however assert that he does not exist because no one has given irrefutable evidence that Santa exists in the first place. Those fossils objectively exist, and you are making the claim that they are fake. You are a bitter little incel contrarian, so you are unable to provide evidence for your claims. You lose. Maybe if you were educated like me you wouldn't humiliate yourself so badly.
I cant prove your plaster sculptures are plaster. I can however assert that they are fake because communists are compulsive liars.
Not an argument. Most of those specimens aren't from China. I accept your concession.
>I can't prove its wrong or fake because other people lie and aslo communism
next you'll call him a chud, right?
>all of those feathers on animals that probably didnt have any
i hope we can move on from this dumb popsci trend soon
We will. Truth is already winning. That's why the featherfags are getting so histrionic and desperate. The more propaganda a movement puts out, the more they're dying. Prehistoric Planet is a perfect example of this. Another is america's constant stream of psyops we're having to put up with every god damned day of our lives at this point.
Is that why your post just got deleted on a board on one of the most free speech tolerant and open ended websites in the world?
You will never be anything other than a lunatic that is laughed off by scientists. Please know your place. You already lost
Wauf doesn't have free speech. I don't know what the fuck you think you're talking about. And with recent chud jannies, it's basically reddit. As for knowing my place, your entire NPC cadre's necks will be reminded.
Any day now.
>america's constant stream of psyops we're having to put up with every god damned day of our lives at this point.
I'm glad I'm not schizophrenic. It sounds hellish. You really should just take the meds so the daily psyops stop.
It already has for the most part. That art is years old from right in the middle of the feathered rex trend
Oh how I wish you were right. No, I'm afraid all paleoartists are still shoving feathers on things that have no business with them. And that's still the norm. Even now it is the exception to see a Tyrannosaurus with zero feathers, not the norm.
NPCs like you are the reason we have to live in a third world hellscape.
you're the only one living in a third world hellscape, gay
You're not the only conscious person in the world. You're just a crazy person that thinks he is.
>America's doing great
>I'm an intelligent, conscious person btw
>I can't afford rent on the waterfront in San Francisco
>US is going DOWN!
kek you're a fucking retard.
are you from russia or something? Maybe you're from china?
Well, you've betrayed your NPChood previously. Now you've also revealed you're dangerously out of touch with reality and a servant of the evil empire.
Just racking up the credibility wins here.
You think everyone that disagrees with you is the same person. It's probably your most entertaining bit. Sometimes I just point out how stupid and wrong you are and then sit back for 48 hours and watch you attack anyone that dares speak to you. Your passion is admirable, your tilting at windmills is just funny.
No, retard, that's your tactic. I have noticed though that you pull of the NPC repeat-projection trick with a bit more frequency that I would be comfortable with from MOST NPCs though. Your NPC levels are troublingly high. This can only mean you're lying on purpose, not too stupid to understand the truth being discussed. This level of NPC can only manifest from intense cognitive dissonance.
Stop typing like a gay and fuck off
Wait til he starts posting selfies for no explicable reason.
Don't let the dino thread die pls
why does every single fucking thread about dinosaurs devolves in a discussion about feathers and transexuals. I'm convinced it's the same two mentally ill people spamming every single thread
It really is just two or three assholes
I think you’re severely underestimating the problem
paranoia and an inability to understand and regulate one's own negative emotions, needing to project them on a simplistic and easy to process target
>my life was good as a child and liked the lizardy t-rex
>my life sucks now and the t-rex is chonky
>the t-rex being chonky must be part of a plan by (them) to make my life suck
in short conservativism.
Was your birth part of the gay agenda?
Lolberals follow the same pattern seeing patriarchies and white supremacy everywhere (while being horribly racist)
The true diagnosis is “terminally american”. Don’t mistake for politics what can be caused by the simple genetic inferiority of handegg sapiens.
90% of americans don't do this.
but you won't find those 90% here or on other chat sites. Americans on the internet are mostly the disabled and terminally unemployable.
You retards do it on live TV and as professional journalists. And university professors. And rich politicians born into affluence. And common factory workers and star bucks cucks.
I see you've never been here. You should visit. It's not at all what you think.
85% of humans are NPCs. You're one of them.
No, he's right and you're a gay libmoron.
>everyone is crazy like me
>in fact I'm not crazy at all
sorry bud, you're actually crazy. Hanging out with other crazy people doesn't make you normal.
Oh wow TIL I was crazy and therefore all my arguments are invalid. Time to get the clot shot. Drumpf lost, sweaty!
>Personifies the NPC meme
>Tries to deny it while unironically proving it's true
You know, I'm getting a little tired of having to congratulate you every thread.
Pretty much yeah. All dino pop culture these days is based on gibberish and nonsense.
>I was crazy and therefore all my arguments are invalid.
I mean it's true.
you might have some lucid arguments, but they're certainly not about feathers or dinosaurs.
Yes, you're right. I'm now going to commit myself to a mental institution for disagreeing with you and academia and *checks notes* reading papers and being aware of the serious problems in modern science.
>you might have some lucid arguments
ALL of my arguments are lucid. The only ones of yours which are are when you stop for a second to recognize I'm right. This isn't an ego thing either. You're just so consistently wrong about everything that you're only hope of being right is to agree with your opponents.
>ALL of my arguments are lucid
so china faked all feathered fossils and american scientists are in on it and it's all a conspiracy to turn kids gay?
I mean you're legit psychotic. These are not lucid arguments or even interesting ones.
>so china faked all feathered fossils and american scientists are in on it
YES.
>and it's all a conspiracy to turn kids gay?
The number of times you bring up homosexuality makes me think your problem is a lack of penis.
There is literally nothing wrong with paranoia.
the paranoia is a classic symptom of your schizophrenia
as I'm sure you've been told, but probably don't realize because you don't think you're paranoid.
Since you're a tele-health official, can you write me up a prescription for expensive pain killers?
I wonder how long you realize you lost this thread as well before you turn it into a pathetic posturing match about whose the more deluded because you ultimately have no argument and no evidence.
>There is literally nothing wrong with paranoia.
It's not paranoia until it is a problem, tho. That's what makes something a mental illness, when it is not allowing you to successfully function in society.
Communists always try to claim anyone disagreeing with them is "mentally ill".
Dinosaurs will always be more relevant than you realize.
Fuck off, NPC gay. Go post more furry porn, since that's what you think this board is for.
But I thought dinosaurs weren't real, remember? Did wittwe babies brain get fried when he changed the topic to watered-down 4chan?
>But I thought dinosaurs weren't real, remember?
I've never said that.
>BUT EVERYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH ME IS ONE PERSON!!!!!
Again, EXTREMELY suHispanicious you targeted the apple post and are screaming about 4chan.
>"extrewmey supichus"
KEK!
>(You): all dees fossiws awe FAEK!
>also (You): i nebew sed dat
I assume you were only pretending to be retarded, hm?
samefag
Oh hey, ya don't say, what gave it away?
I see one escaped it's containment board again?
Take your Copium badge and go.
>believes the NPC meme
>also a braindead 4chancel
kys newfag
I allways love your kind of schizo.
They make me remeber that I am not a compkeatly lost case. And that I still have a family and friends. 🙂
Three rhinoceroses in a trench coat.
Sorry for late reply.
>according to modern resources
Apple directors*
Actually PP had "real" paleontologists on the crew. Unfortunately, they were all feathergay retards of the sort that publish nonsense and spread contrarian Dinosaur specart bullshit to the goyim.
>eXtreme!
Is this the fucking 90s again?
On a related note, why does modern "science" keep claiming bears are also so hilariously fat? They look like furry sausages. I think they just want to make anything cool look sissy because of gnomish propaganda.
Because bears fatten themselves up for hibernation you autistic polmoron.
>I think they just want to make anything cool look sissy because of gnomish propaganda.
to a man with a hammer, everything is a nail
you should try getting a job and not being a parasite on our welfare system and you'll realize garden gnomes don't control shit. Your boss Maria does, and she's not a fucking garden gnome.
Just look at this, do you really think apex predators would look this cuddly? The media and deep state is brainwashing us trying to delete any sign of masculinity and toughness and make us obedient. Open your eyes!
>The media and deep state is brainwashing us trying to delete any sign of masculinity and toughness and make us obedient
not sure if ironic shitposting, but in case anon missed the point
maria is the real problem anon has, not Schlomo. Women are better educated than that guy, better employed, more antagonistic to men, and more accepting of other men of different cultures and ethnicities.
anon complains of garden gnomes when gnomish men are just as fed up with women as he is.
.
>Who you calling a sissy, bitch?
Lots of shit is anthopomorphised because our culture is being infantilised. Bears do get fat, but they are still terrifying as fuck
>Bears do get fat, but they are still terrifying as fuck
Same with T-rex
It having some actual muscle on it's bones is still going to do absolutely nothing about it's signature predator gaze above a massive pair of jaws
Part of the problem is proving that they're real requires a lot more education than anon is willing or able to absorb.
One of the interesting things I ran into early in my dinosaur career is the occipital condyle. Like coming out of high school they don't really tell you that mammals have 2 occipital condyles while reptiles only have 1. So I didn't know how to look at a single bone and tell if it was a mammal or a reptile if I didn't have any other context. But you start learning the differences and suddenly you can tell just by looking at a bone if it came from a mammal or a reptile or an amphibian or a fish. The more you learn the better your ability to spot truth.
After a while the idea of faking all these little differences that the schizo doesn't even know becomes ridiculous. Like if we're just fooling a bunch of high school educated creationists, we don't need to concern ourselves with the 5th trochanter or the ascending process of the astragalus. But those details are present even though the schizo doesn't know what they mean. Which is a convincing argument against fakery. Just not one he's smart enough to understand.
this is a bit of a moot point though
anyone that has studied dinosaur anatomy to the level of being able to ID dino bones by sight has also dug dinosaurs out of the ground and ID'd them. They already know the bones are real and came from dinosaurs because they came directly out of the rock and there's nothing else in the entire world like them.
Why not deal with living animals at this point
>Why not deal with living animals at this point
paleontologists spend close to a decade studying living animals, including humans. That's how we learn to ID dead ones.
Because there are currently many people studying living animals and we happen to find the extinct ones more interesting.
>schizo resorts to gish galloping
You will never be the epic paradigm shifter you wish you were.
seething lol.
never any valid arguments.
no convincing evidence ever posted.
no sources to anything.
>"L-look at these bing images I found"
>"It's r-real you s-science denier! I was told on good authority! REEEEEE"
Lmao
No, I was honestly curious if you meant the people that started dinosaur paleontology like Mantell, Buckland, Owen, and Cuvier
because I'm guessing you actually meant Cope and Marsh because you never "researched" a dang thing.
Id like to thank you for your insight that will no doubt be published for 1000 years
We all accept your concession while you undergo your latest dilation session on the internet, sweetie.
I guess your trolling is getting too many responses to keep up with.
but if you get time, please answer this
I am genuinely curious what your complaints are with these characters.
Cope and Marsh didn't start dinosaur paleontology by any stretch of the imagination, but their methods could certainly be criticized. The funny thing is neither of them is particularly famous in science for their paleontology. They were much more successful zoologists and ecologists than paleontologists. Both produced bodies of work that have nothing to do with dinosaurs.
Not him, but a large source of this current pulse of dinosaur denying schizos is a series of youtube videos by a flat earther named Eric Dubay. In his videos, Dubay made major error by confusing the first dinosaur ever described from America by Leidy with the first Dinosaur ever described. With his timeline now fucked up, Dubay asserted that Richard Owen coined the term Dinosauria out of necessity for the concept of evolution without any dinosaur ever actually being discovered.
Good thing we don't eat dinosaurs
Sorry I'm autistic, could you explain the joke?
No, all the best and good luck
What do you think they would taste like
We do, regularly
ok, thanks
If anon did read up on why Owen coined the term he might be shocked by the elegance and brilliance of his discovery. The dude seriously was a genius, and what he discovered is still amazing today. Also the source of all the feather debates Wauf loves so much.
Because he's most commonly found in America.
I get that you're not very smart, but do these two skeletons look similar to you?
>skeleton
>posts a drawing
The skeleton was posted here
and
. You acknowledged it was real, but was probably a large bird like a cassowary. Are you still willing to say that?
to be fair you can't post a skeleton on the internet.
you also can't post a drawing
you might be able to post an image of a skeleton or a drawing.
I got proof right here, it's this tiny fossil of an earbone that proves everything...
Yeah thats what I thought. Back down.
>no argument except "lol"
>this is the average calibre of dinosaurlets
Nice one champ, you're a shining intellectual. The Cassowary and other birds like it literally looks like those "dinosaur" bones. The feet look exactly like T-Rex feet. Why did "scientists" start moving dinosaurs closer and closer to looking like birds?
>Cassowary literally looks like dinosaur bones
Because they both have feathers and stand on two legs? Are creationists really this stupid?
>Partial
Nope! Thats complete
>Giant chicken
That Giant chicken has teeth, a tail and is 30 feet long lol
>Drawing
Nope! Sinortnithosaurus, you can go see it on display in China.
>Schizo
It is a 95% complete skeleton. Educated people (read: not you) can determine what a bone is and where it goes, even if it isn't totally articulated.
>Bird
Birds don't have tails
>Plaaster
Nope. Neither of those are made out of plaster, stupid child.
>Turtle
Why does that turtle have no shell, teeth, and a long neck? Why are you still in this thread eve though you've been humilated?
>Show me proof
I've shown you proof, now the burden is on you to show why these things are fake.
>Some of them are full blown plaster
They are not. Thats why I specifically chose them. Because they are 100% real, mostly articulated, and publicly displayed for you to independently verify.
>Cassowary
Damn look at that cassowary skull
You are not a serious person. You lose :^)
>Sinortnithosaurus
>he trusts China LOL
LMFAO. Pic related. Nice bird that may have existed a few thousand years ago.
Still waiting on proof of these giant lizards like T-Rex that existed millions of years ago.
Again I'll reiterate, any real skeletons are that of animals that are related to those that we know to exist. Birds are not lizards. There are and were huge or giant bird species that existed.
The pantheon of *giant lizards* that are fabricated based on bone fragments or a couple large bones is what I'm calling fake, because they are.
Lmfao you could only respond to a single point thats how completely fucking bankrupt you are you pathetic fucking joke. How do you have enough cognitive dissonance to convince yourself that you should keep arguing when its immediately evident that you cant even respond to 8/10 examples? Know your place when speaking to your betters.
>could only respond to a single point
I only needed to respond to one to show the rest were ridiculous. You didn't disprove any of my previous points anyway.
Disprove what???? That they *might* be fake??? That is a claim that YOU are making and YOU need to provide evidence for. You can't. Fucking loser, get out of my sight.
Thanks for playing. Better luck next time.
I accept your concession. Know your place when speaking to your betters, child. Maybe if you were actually educated like me you wouldn't embarrass yourself so thoroughly :^)
Dinosaurfags are the biggest fucking losers on the planet
T. Palaeontologist
Ok, I don't care. Stay mad, I guess?
>Know your place when speaking to your betters
You are roughly equals. You both have a Y chromosome.
who cares
me, ya bitch!
~~*Modern Resources*~~
he was a big lizard and yall can't tell me nothin
How accurate is the ~~*science*~~ when it comes to dinosaurs?
Dinosaurs are not real. All they have are literal bone fragments, and a few large bones. No complete skeletons.
Those skeletons you see in museums have like 1-2 real bones on them, the rest came from the headcanon of some faggy scientist.
As to what those big bones are from, giant versions of existing animals. There, mystery solved.
Can't imagine being this stupid. Go get knocked up by your useless husband for the sixth time, christfag
Prove me wrong. Lets see a full skeleton, champ. I'll be waiting for links. If you look into it you will find that I'm correct on every point. Most of the "skeletons" are how fag scientists IMAGINED them to look, and they base it off bone fragments or as few as one bone. That's literally the science.
Still don't believe me? Why has the look of dinosaurs shifted so much over the years? Go back and look at what they first said they looked like when they first invented dinosaurs. Then look at how they looked in the 60's, 70's, 80's and 90's.
20 years ago they were scaled. Oh, no they're feathered. Ayo hol' up, maybe they weren't feathered. Lmao. Have fun believing this money laundering psyop, retard.
What about that home depot dolly with the shotgun attached to it that they use to send images of fossils back to the computer screen? Did the paleontologists plant the remains there and stage the whole thing?
Got any pics chief?
No? I'll be waiting.
Your claims fall flat at the press of a button. Take your meds.
>Verification not required.
>Prove me wrong. Lets see a full skeleton, champ
One has already been posted in this thread you absolute mouthbreather
>Including obviously plaster bones in your highlight
KEK.
>uses an image from a movie to defend his point
LMAO. Can't make this shit up. I guess it's fitting in a way, the dinosaur hoax is like a movie script.
I asked for images of full skeletons, and just like I said, neither of you could. You give me a picture of a statue of a "dinosaur" with 95% fake bones, and a few large bones on there, which as I said come from large versions/species of existing animals. Those bones could be arranged in a hundred different ways with new fake bones added to create all kinds of creatures, and you'd probably believe every single one if the scientists told you to.
Fucking pathetic losers.
Dumb manchild
First prove that's not another plaster sculpture.
I'll wait.
What do you reckon it is?
You didn't actually. There's no proof any of those images posted in this thread are actually real bones. You posted IMAGES. Where's the sources? Articles with information? Where's info about where they were found, and how many of the bones are real? Are any of the ones you posted real at all? Are they plaster sculptures of a "real" dinosaur? Any link to trustworthy info about the validity of these skeletons? Or did you just search "realest dinosaur skeleton" on google images? (You did).
Did you have images of how they looked at the "dig site"?
What we can know for sure is that there are thousands of plaster sculptures with a few fragments or whole pieces of alleged "dinosaur" bones chucked on.
Do either of you know what "appeal to authority" is?
Have either of you ever questioned how many hundreds of millions has gone into dinosaur paleontology? (incentive to lie)
Have either of you ever researched how dinosaur paleontology started? Like, the guys who started it. I dare you to look into it.
>Like, the guys who started it. I dare you to look into it.
gideon mantel, william buckland, and richard owen? Those nefarious scallywags
Nope! That's not how this works. I have demonstrated that these skeletons exist. You're the one making the claim that it is fake/plaster. The burden of proof is on you. If you cannot demonstrate that it is fake, then I accept your concession :^)
>I can't be duped because I think everything is fake
>prove me wrong
kek
Anon you can think anything is fake that you want, you just can't be expected to be taken seriously if you have no evidence.
You've got your work cut out for you proving everything that is real though? Chop chop
I accept your concession :^)
>Or did you just search "realest dinosaur skeleton" on google images? (You did).
No, I selected examples of fossils that I've come across that I know to be complete, fully or mostly articulated, and on public display. About half of them are pieces I have seen in person.
>Where's the sources?
https://web.archive.org/web/20120417134949/http://www.xinglida.net/pdf/Xu_et_al_2012_Yutyrannus.pdf
For the Yutyrannus. I'll provide publications on each fossil I posted at your request.
>Any link to trustworthy info
I highly doubt there is any academic organization that would be credible to you, fucking raving lunatic schizo failure
>What we can know for sure is that there are thousands of plaster sculptures with a few fragments or whole pieces of alleged "dinosaur" bones chucked on.
Yes scientists tend to not like it when steel rods are drilled into the bones they spent years excavating to be dangled in front of gaping crowds. The real bones are kept in the back, and the museums will even show you if you ask nicely. Not that you would put that much effort into your lunatic ramblings.
Every dinosaur you have ever heard of is known from dozens of partial skeletons and usually a couple >90% complete specimens. I can provide citations for each famous genus on request.
>Do either of you know what "appeal to authority" is?
Yes. You made one here:
>Any link to trustworthy info about the validity of these skeletons
>Have either of you ever questioned how many hundreds of millions has gone into dinosaur paleontology?
Are you under the impression that paleontologists are wealthy people? roflmao
>Like, the guys who started it. I dare you to look into it.
What exactly did you learn in a youtube video essay that you think I don't know? Be specific. You've been barely managing to stay above water by using vague arguments and no specific examples. Everyone sees what you are, worthless lunatic freak.
I can do this all day
I enjoy embarrassing pathetic neo-luddite pseuds so much
shut up proofster
Are we done here?
Just because you're too stupid to understand it doesn't mean that its a gnomish trick.
Bonus Round!: complete skeletons of animals that aren't dinosaurs but you're too stupid to tell the difference.
Next time, know your place before you humiliate yourself again
>movie
Jurassic Park is a documentary. Seethe.
The only reason you believe this craziness is because you think dinosaurs are not in the Bible.
It's a disinfo agent. As usual, it's malice, not incompetence.
That all depends on what you’re asking. Are you asking about the mainstream narrative? Because that’s batshit bonkers. Or are you asking about the actual fossil evidence and rarely heard good paleontology? Right now the entire field is basically deviantart tier. I wouldn’t put much stock in anything published on Dinosaurs in the past 30 years. There are still discoveries and good details mentioned that aren’t heard about. The mesothermy study I often mention should have had a larger sample size species wise, but other than that it pretty much puts to bed the view that Dinosaurs were warm-blooded - in fact the supposedly feathered dinosaurs are some of the MOST cold-blooded. But you won’t hear about that in the news, because that’s actual science. Now all these fucking retarded “theories” like “scales come from feathers” or “feathers are an ancestral dinosaur trait” or “Ornithoscelida is real!” or Nick Longrich’s retarded fucking paper trying to cope Torosaurus into not being Triceratops where he claims that an animal with a 9’ long skull is a “juvenile” and that he can sex dinosaurs (nobody can) - the bullshit you hear the most about, that’s shit grade paleontology, and most of it isn’t science at all. But that’s the shit that gets pop star level recognition and taints the entire field. The gays have control of paleontology now and they have successfully convinced the majority of the population that all the clearly wrong, contrarian “theories” about Dinosaurs are self-evident actually. Then when they’re confronted about it, they try to cringe and cower and deny all responsibility as if this problem created itself somehow.
>reproducing and your children inheriting the earth is an insult
It's a trend to make dinosaurs fat.
Before it was feather.
Yep. Whatever academia can do to subvert. And the reason is EVERYTHING must be subverted in society or the goblins in control lose power. Any chink in the armor causes the entire farce to collapse. Truth anywhere is a threat to their goals everywhere.
It’s kind of amazing that glowmorons care so much about paleontology, probably because the amount of autists Dinosaurs attract poses a “noticing” threat. This “DINOSAURS AREN’T REAL! LOOKAMEEEEE‼!” bullshit is exactly like the “SPACE IS FAKE AND THE EARTH IS FLAT‼!” propaganda that starts appearing when you mention NASA’s long history of fraud.
I don’t mind t-rex looking like a chicken, chickens are very lovely animals.
>Posts human
>On an Animals and Nature board
What are you gays complaining about now? Have you ever seen a Tyrannosaurus fossil up close? They're bulky fuckers with barrel shaped torsos. They have thick leg bones and long tails.
The latest renditions look great. My personal favorite is the green one from Prehistoric Planet, green being the objectively best color for a Tyrannosaurus.
sorry bro it's cool didn't mean to insult y-...you're favorite dinosaur. t-rexs are very attractive to their potential mates!
>your
haha sorry please don't eat me bro
so that other dinosaurs would laugh too much to run away from him (so he could eat)
What is going on in academia that people are trying to make the trex look stupid anyway anyhow?
I want in. What's the thought process here?
so basically it's the garden gnomes
They're definitely involved, but probably not something they care about since it doesn't involve extracting life energies from goyim
He's bulking
Wholesome Chungus.
Archeologists are hacks, they probably just found some incomplete skeleton of a sick specimen and spun some fairy tale to secure more grants for their hare-brained useless profession.
I can't tell if you're actually a retard or just pretending for laughs.
it's not really funny though, so I'm guessing you're actually retarded.
>rEaLlY
Not him, but it's true though. Even the smallest difference between specimens has the team behind the discovery publishing paper after paper about it being a new species.
>I can't tell if you're actually a retard or just pretending for laughs.
Do you even know where you are? Of course he's retarded.
He ate all the other pokemons
body positivity propaganda
Here's a more up to date reconstruction
That's a fungus.
It had like 32 lungs that filled up almost the entire torso and parts of the face, neck, hips, tail, legs, and arms.
it was a walking balloon
Looking at him I wonder how he was even able to chase his prey yet walk properly. He's built like a hippo but 2 legs supporting this mountain of meat instead of 4.
They have a low center of gravity and their tail is half their body length. I think they just have really good balance and strong legs.
>He's built like a hippo
A hippo's top running speed is 30 km/h.
Unless you are an athlete runner, a hippo WILL outrun you if you.
You know why?
Because a hippo looks like this under 5 cm of skin.
T-rex also had hollow bones, They are not as dense as elephants.
Cut him some slack for his physique. He's a single dad looking at 3(2) kids.
At that point he had 4 kids, and considering they started at 15 eggs and only 3 would survive into adulthood, he's still doing okay.
Being a round boi seems like a solid defensive shape for t rex to have. Fewer sharp angles for an opposing rex to get an impactful or tearing bite into and a more deflective shape for matchups against ankylosaurs, pachycephalosaurs and triceratops (especially for juvenile rexes).
I have this theory that theropods use their front limbs to grab each other's torso when they're fighting, like komodos. But T. rex opted for small front limbs and bit each other on the face instead (hence the numerous bite marks on the Rex skulls found). The bulky torso might be helpful to push rivals around.
It's often theorized it's for sex, since carnotaurus's arms are even smaller, yet these limbs were still quite strong, having the same purpose as pelvic spurs on pythons
im going to chomp your arm off but first let me *huff* have a snack and take a nap yes
why did they give her a surname?
I’m no expert, but aren’t large predators generally kinda fat? Bears, tigers, crocs, etc seem a bit fat, so I think a t-rex would be a little fat, though maybe not quite as much as that pic.
Tigers are absolutely shredded
They are built fat. Their forearms are the only place you visibly see muscles.
All of that "fat" is pure muscle needed to run at 30mph+ and rip heads off anyone that talks shit. That's why.
Why do you want T rex to look like an auschwitz victim?
He was very fat compared to the old muscular JP design.
Well, at least he didn't have feathers.
That's not realistic musculature. Bulging limbs just make you feel like you'd let T rex fuck you. But look at that fucking neck. Is that a neck that rips and tears? No. That's a neck with more human proportions that I think you just like for reasons already mentioned. What about all the torso muscles that help balance those huge limbs? Realistically animals, especially carnivores, have a shitton of core and neck strength that almost dwarfs their limbs. It also needs huge guts to power its killing sprees and hold the shredded flesh of the slain. That would make it a little fatter.
And here you are bitching about T rex getting more muscles and enhancements that make it a better killing machine because it draws it away from proportions you associate with sexual imagery and closer to an actual lizard. And yet, it is still, you know, a fucking lizard.
Dino-SAUR.
Terrible LIZARD.
>And yet, it is still, you know, a fucking lizard.
>Dino-SAUR.
>Terrible LIZARD.
Eh...I've seen worse bait.
Nah, it's not bait. You're just retarded.
I'd argue that Jurassic Park's T-Rex was malnourished, all they fed it was a goat, this is a creature that could eat a triceratops
All things considered that T-rex was pretty chill and well mannered considering it might be starving. Even polar bears stop giving a shit about people when they're full, problem is they're never full.
I started lifting at 9 years old because of Rexy. My whole worldview is shattered.
>30mph+
and then immediately die of heat exhaustion.
Rex likely topped out at around 25mph and only for very brief stretches.
could it even use its arms for anything?
Probably not. It always irks me when midwits try to find a function for a vestigial appendage. It's like they can't grasp that it takes time for an organ to disappear from a lineage.
I heard there was a picture of a skeleton on the darkweb.
And yet, they keep happening and your dumb asses keep falling for it, handwaving it away when you get caught, then pretending you've never been wrong. It's easy to bat 1000 if ignore all your strike outs, try to get everyone fired that mentions them, then tell the news reporters you've never missed a ball.
So here's a test: Are Silesaurids Ornithischians?
Dummass. The Rex was slow as shit. Slow motherfucker would be starve in today's world.
>Retard believing speed estimates
they could survive in India assuming humans weren't there