>wolves hate men
Wolves don’t hate men. They shy away from sudden and fast movements, eye contact, and loud, low pitched noises. Men do these to everything because women are programmed to sexually and mentally submit to whatever man does it the best and men are programmed to follow that guy’s orders.
With wolves these behaviors are all considered unprompted threats. They don’t act like this towards each other unless they mean it. If a man acknowledges that wolves are skittish and tones it down he won’t have a problem. If a man is just an autist (ape software running on human hardware) he won’t have any problems.
These aren’t statistically significant numbers. It’s like lower than the diagnoses of obscure mental illnesses and it discounts that not all animal abuse is criminal and seems to be arrests compiled by an internet forum instead of a serious study on human behavior.
I really really doubt bestiality is 17:1. That’s orders of magnitude off from a study done by the fucking university of vienna. If this is arrests, it’s biased by anglo culture.
Feminists be like “not all rapists are arrested. MALE cops dont think every sex crime is worth their time!” “ok but when its making women look better all rapists are arrested”
Yeah here’s the source. A secondary account of secondary data of an unreliable and socially confounded nature. We don’t even count hitting dogs and caging them without water as abuse unless we don’t like someone for other reasons. For ms and mr mercedes Benz it’s called discipline and crate training.
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-13439-001
I’d like to see the primary data and establish a pattern of law enforcement bias in order to encourage legislators and veterinarians to uncover “low priority” animal abuse such as crating, shocking, lighter beating, choking, and sexually submissive zoophilia. All things that leave little to no evidence and are considered less horrific than some crackhead buttfucking a small animal, but actually cause more suffering because they can go on for the animals entire life without anyone caring.
Submissive zoophiles especially. Rape is a violent crime, and all sex with animals is rape. I can’t believe we haven’t even been looking for what could be thousands of violent rapists horrifically abusing male dogs just because there’s rarely any more evidence than some thin film with DNA in it. But there is DNA, lots, where it has no excuse to be.
Will you join me in campaigning for comprehensive enforcement of morally correct laws?
Probably the same thing that makes a man's piss able to mark territory as a human for other animals while female pheromones in women's urine make the action backfire if done
Because women are the inferior sex. They are incapable of violence and are biologically programmed to submit to and serve the most violent thing in the room. Wolves detect this.
Familiar men are a canids bros for life though. They pick a bro over a ho every time. Similar reasons. The women are also useless.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Female wolves hunt. They're part of the pack. Male and female wolves have their own hierarchies. Low ranked males are subservient to high ranked females. Humans aren't that dissimilar. It's why incels like to pretend women can't be better than them at anything. They're insecure.
HUMAN women are useless anon.
And wolves know that.
Wolves aren't quite as sexually dimorphic as humans because they are carnivores, all of them hunt.
Human women are a liability at pretty much anything they touch.
Tribes didn't have strict rules about what men and women did, while it was true most women chose to forage, do agriculture, and nurture babies, it wasn't uncommon for women to like hunting, fishing, and building. The strict enforcement of these roles came when civilized society pushed women into strictly birthing and care taker roles as nation states were becoming more predominant.
The average tribe lady would beat your or my ass, they could scrap and were survivors. Assuming you aren't a trained fighter or something in which case you would still come home tired.
>The average tribe lady would beat your or my ass, they could scrap and were survivors
And the average tribe MAN was a lean killing machine that ran marathons carrying bundles of spears anon.
Just because 9/10ths of modern humans are fat but somehow still malnourished fags doesn't mean we all are.
You overestimate what women are capable of, a trained woman is just about a match for an "average man."
Take a man that does 10 pressups a day and he'll kill pretty much any woman.
Why do you think male athletes who rank in the bottom hundreds in male tables can troon out and suddenly be #1 in the world and not even close.
No one said the average woman was as strong as the average man, I said this idea that women didn't hunt and posed no threat to wild animals is incorrect, which it is.
https://voca.ro/1ld8q8Xk9NDr
1 month ago
Anonymous
You're arguing with a troll, dude.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Humans have 4 limbs. The fact that a small percentage has less doesn't change this fact. The vast majority of women did not hunt, and the few that did did small traps at best. Get your feminist trash out of here.
Smells like a weak low value male trying to overstate the value of men to prop himself up.
Smells like a woman doing stolen valor. Women do not deice what is high and low value btw.
Tribes didn't have strict rules about what men and women did, while it was true most women chose to forage, do agriculture, and nurture babies, it wasn't uncommon for women to like hunting, fishing, and building. The strict enforcement of these roles came when civilized society pushed women into strictly birthing and care taker roles as nation states were becoming more predominant.
The average tribe lady would beat your or my ass, they could scrap and were survivors. Assuming you aren't a trained fighter or something in which case you would still come home tired.
men are scary. low voice. wide gestures. bigger. the moment he feminizes himself the wolf reacts more positively. thats the video. thank me later.
Even chickens prefer female faces
https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/chickens-prefer-beautiful-humans
>even my hens prefer more beautiful people
fucking end my life.
have a nice day unlovable homosexuals
___ ____ ____
it's because they know the woman will let him mount her
/thread
So will the guy
>wolves hate men
Wolves don’t hate men. They shy away from sudden and fast movements, eye contact, and loud, low pitched noises. Men do these to everything because women are programmed to sexually and mentally submit to whatever man does it the best and men are programmed to follow that guy’s orders.
With wolves these behaviors are all considered unprompted threats. They don’t act like this towards each other unless they mean it. If a man acknowledges that wolves are skittish and tones it down he won’t have a problem. If a man is just an autist (ape software running on human hardware) he won’t have any problems.
Animals also dislike twitchy, loud, ADHD thots.
Animals are good judges of character. Why do you retards keep making me pull this out?
nem btfo
These aren’t statistically significant numbers. It’s like lower than the diagnoses of obscure mental illnesses and it discounts that not all animal abuse is criminal and seems to be arrests compiled by an internet forum instead of a serious study on human behavior.
I really really doubt bestiality is 17:1. That’s orders of magnitude off from a study done by the fucking university of vienna. If this is arrests, it’s biased by anglo culture.
Feminists be like “not all rapists are arrested. MALE cops dont think every sex crime is worth their time!” “ok but when its making women look better all rapists are arrested”
So arrests don't correlate to crimes committed? Interesting.
Yeah here’s the source. A secondary account of secondary data of an unreliable and socially confounded nature. We don’t even count hitting dogs and caging them without water as abuse unless we don’t like someone for other reasons. For ms and mr mercedes Benz it’s called discipline and crate training.
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-13439-001
I’d like to see the primary data and establish a pattern of law enforcement bias in order to encourage legislators and veterinarians to uncover “low priority” animal abuse such as crating, shocking, lighter beating, choking, and sexually submissive zoophilia. All things that leave little to no evidence and are considered less horrific than some crackhead buttfucking a small animal, but actually cause more suffering because they can go on for the animals entire life without anyone caring.
Submissive zoophiles especially. Rape is a violent crime, and all sex with animals is rape. I can’t believe we haven’t even been looking for what could be thousands of violent rapists horrifically abusing male dogs just because there’s rarely any more evidence than some thin film with DNA in it. But there is DNA, lots, where it has no excuse to be.
Will you join me in campaigning for comprehensive enforcement of morally correct laws?
Women commit the vast majority of violence, just compare abortion numbers with homicide violence.
wolves love me, especially female wolves
Women are weak prey items and men are competition.
something to do with smell i would imagine
Probably the same thing that makes a man's piss able to mark territory as a human for other animals while female pheromones in women's urine make the action backfire if done
Because women are the inferior sex. They are incapable of violence and are biologically programmed to submit to and serve the most violent thing in the room. Wolves detect this.
Familiar men are a canids bros for life though. They pick a bro over a ho every time. Similar reasons. The women are also useless.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Female wolves hunt. They're part of the pack. Male and female wolves have their own hierarchies. Low ranked males are subservient to high ranked females. Humans aren't that dissimilar. It's why incels like to pretend women can't be better than them at anything. They're insecure.
HUMAN women are useless anon.
And wolves know that.
Wolves aren't quite as sexually dimorphic as humans because they are carnivores, all of them hunt.
Human women are a liability at pretty much anything they touch.
>The average tribe lady would beat your or my ass, they could scrap and were survivors
And the average tribe MAN was a lean killing machine that ran marathons carrying bundles of spears anon.
Just because 9/10ths of modern humans are fat but somehow still malnourished fags doesn't mean we all are.
You overestimate what women are capable of, a trained woman is just about a match for an "average man."
Take a man that does 10 pressups a day and he'll kill pretty much any woman.
Why do you think male athletes who rank in the bottom hundreds in male tables can troon out and suddenly be #1 in the world and not even close.
Smells like a weak low value male trying to overstate the value of men to prop himself up.
Show her this epic own, she'll DEFINITELY fuck you now dude.
Women are great entertainers and great companions. We are equal but vastly different. Humans are sexually dimorphic. That's an indisputable fact.
So their sole use is incubators for young according to you. Steady on with the sexism.
No one said the average woman was as strong as the average man, I said this idea that women didn't hunt and posed no threat to wild animals is incorrect, which it is.
https://voca.ro/1ld8q8Xk9NDr
You're arguing with a troll, dude.
Humans have 4 limbs. The fact that a small percentage has less doesn't change this fact. The vast majority of women did not hunt, and the few that did did small traps at best. Get your feminist trash out of here.
Smells like a woman doing stolen valor. Women do not deice what is high and low value btw.
human women are not useless. Human males cannot pass on their genes without human women.
They just know.
Instinctively, we all know why. We know where a man's roll in the tribe is, and we know where a woman's role is.
*rôle
Tribes didn't have strict rules about what men and women did, while it was true most women chose to forage, do agriculture, and nurture babies, it wasn't uncommon for women to like hunting, fishing, and building. The strict enforcement of these roles came when civilized society pushed women into strictly birthing and care taker roles as nation states were becoming more predominant.
The average tribe lady would beat your or my ass, they could scrap and were survivors. Assuming you aren't a trained fighter or something in which case you would still come home tired.