Why do they REFUSE to acknowledge the existence of Sasquatch? Thousands of credible sighting each year yet they REFUSE.

Why do they REFUSE to acknowledge the existence of Sasquatch? Thousands of credible sighting each year yet they REFUSE. Why?

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Uh-huh but check out the perfectly flat and smooth rubber soles on the bottom of the costume's feet. Oh and before you try to come back with any photoshopped """""enhancements""""" adding toes note that I can easily pull up any of the actual, original frames from the P-G video.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Now look at the textured soles from this much better gorilla suit from the 40's. "Costume technology" sure had regressed a lot huh. Good thing the P-G video is of such shitty quality. If only literally everyone was carrying an HD camera with them nowadays, then we could get some real pictures if bigfeets indeed exist.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      She's walking thru snow mouth breather

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it's a government conspiracy man!
    they're hiding the bigfoots and other aliens for national security reasons

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    /bfg/ is forever

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What would even be the evolutionary history of the bigfoot? There were never apes in americas and no monkey lived in north america for a long time.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      One of the most popular theories by people who bother even trying to explain things like that, think its Gigantopithecus who came over on the land bridges.

      But the Gigachad Orang would have had a really bad time in North America if they came over. Not only are there giant Predators out the ass but it's a completely different environment than what they had in China. They would have to go all way to to southern Mexico to find anything close to the jungles that came from. If you notice, Big Foot/Squatch is a Northen America thing and never hear reports about them lower than Texas.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They are a human sub like denisovans or neanderthal. They were precursor people in the americas before asians crossed the land bridge and mostly genocided them all.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Lots of the Native Tribes do have tales of Mountain/Wild/Wolf/Giant Men in the deep parts of the wilds, So I do think there might have been some kind of Sub Human/Ape in this part of the world at some point in the over 100K years that the First Nation peoples have been here, BUT I also think they died out long LONG ago, like the Thunderbird.

        There are too many people, too many cameras, too little truly untouched places left in NA for such a Large Animal/Humanoid to go unfound.
        Not a single fossil.
        No bodies washed down from a flash flood.
        No charred remains from a wild fire.
        No bodies from Bear/Wolf/Big Cat attacks
        There are no Bears/Moose/Deers/Crocs will scars that would come from a fight with a giant primate.
        You don't see deers/wolves/other smaller animals remains that have their neck broke/head crushed/rib cage shattered nor their bones with teeth marks from a primate.
        Not even a pile of scat that does not match something you'd see from a large mammal in the area.

        They would leave some kind of evidence. Video/Photos can easily be faked one way or another. You can't really ever trust them even more so in the modern era. What would get people to take it serious if there was unexplained things found like what I listed above. Like how Sperm Whales were known for years to have scars on them that looked like they came from massive Squids but Giant Squids were considered a Myth until relatively recently. Because people saw the evidence that there was some kind of massive squid out there with dinner plate side suckers out there, they actually looked and found them.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why are they so bottom heavy? It's alluring...

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can they exist? Sure. Do they? Most likely not.

    There is a very noticeable lack of evidence. No bodies from floods/wildfires/earthquakes/bear attacks, No videos that don't look like a pixelated mess from half a mile away, no getting hit by a car/truck, No trail camera footage, No security footage from various places, no hunter blasting one and parading around their one of a kind trophy, you don't see Bears/Moose/Deer with wounds/scars from some kind of primate.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Thousands of credible sightings each year
    Cite ONE. Or, better yet, ten

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Phone cameras/digital cameras have increased in image quality, focus speed, low light performance, and optical zoom by at least one order of magnitude, and the low light performance and focus speed even exceeds the vast majority of DSLRs/mirrorless/film cameras now.

    Yet every year we get the same ultra blurry shots as if we're still shooting on a 90's webcam.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      My sony a6500 mogs an iphone 14 hard. Night mode is just bracketing/hdr done for you. It wouldn’t reliably capture a moving animal. The quality of my sony at very high ISOs on the other hand would look 10x better than a phone shot just because you’d have a sharp although noisy picture instead of a heavily pixellated and blurry shot from the phone going into pixel binning and HDR mode. Phones are actually still shit for anything far away or in dim light if it’s moving at all. It’s a laws of physics problem related to small sensors and small optics. They gather less light. They resolve less detail without compositing (which is how the human brain processes vision)

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        All well and good, however the point still stands: camera technology has improved radically and quality cameras have become so easy and cheap to acquire yet the pictures of sasquatch is still 90's digital at best. I mean a Canon AE-1, which was my first SLR (obviously a hand-me-down) was $600 at release, which would be about $2900 today. $2900 today could buy three Sony A6500, or one with a pretty fucking nice lens, or even a full frame Sony A7 III with an okay lens.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      because with a clear footage you can see its a man with a retarded suit

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    are those sightings in your room with you right now?

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The idea of a great ape of that size living undetected for 300+ years in North America is beyond absurd. There's no way we could hide for that amount of time given all of the development and deforestation that has gone on.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It’s not an ape

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Alright, I'll bite. The fuck is it then?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          A Carcharodontosaurus saharicus.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    We need more video sightings. In my opinion the only legit ones are the PGF and the Freeman footage.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Creditable

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    show me proof beyond this hoax video

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Notice how the being in the video has breasts. Do you really think someone with the skills to make a suit that realistic would make it with fucking tits?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        still waiting for proof

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >nobody would make a fursuit with breasts

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I have three in my garage right now!

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The being in that video is unironically real. It's not a human in a suit. What is it?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Probably your mom.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        How would we be able to tell what it is until we open the suit?

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Credible sightings
    >Thousands per year
    Ok, then. Convince me. Give me some credible sightings.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Try doing your own research for once instead of just consuming ready made predigested content from your favorite Science Man.

      You'll just no true Scotsman everything. Someone could drive a living specimen to your house and until your Science Man tells you it's real you'd find a way to debunk it like the schizo you are.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Lmao retard

        https://i.imgur.com/MsZN6Jm.jpg

        Why do they REFUSE to acknowledge the existence of Sasquatch? Thousands of credible sighting each year yet they REFUSE. Why?

        >credible
        Inconsistent hoaxes

        Enjoy freaking out over a poorly articulated suit

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Try doing your own research for once instead of just consuming ready made predigested content from your favorite Science Man.
        Ik your trolling but the burden of proof is on the claiment, im not the one claiming there is a giant fucking ape loitering around the US.
        >You'll just no true Scotsman everything. Someone could drive a living specimen to your house and until your Science Man tells you it's real you'd find a way to debunk it like the schizo you are.
        For a start that isnt how a no true scotsman fallacy works, and personally id fucking love to have a giant ape in the wilds of america, I just dont see the evidence for it.
        I want to belive

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          There is more evidence in hundreds of eyewitness accounts and photos/footprints for the existence of squatch than there is in the single argument that hur monke big can't hide even though huge areas of US and Canada are basically virgin wilderness

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >anecdotes
            Not evidence
            >footprints
            Somehow bigfoot has more diverse and plainly unnatural foot morphology than any primate. More like they are hoaxes. Anyone with fifth grade sculpting skills can fake a footprint. Every bigfoot print thus far had been a proven hoax. No one has ever found hair or skin or feces to go with the prints. It turns out to be dog/bear/human.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            fewer people than were ever looking for sasquatch found “mythical” gorillas in an area of Africa nearly as large as the US. And they were just visiting. Every local already saw them. Not just that, but they had killed and ate them.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Local natives brought white scientists directly to the gorillas that only the scientists were deriding as mythical, natives knew exactly where they were just like with okapi. Typical story with city bred bookworms who never actually inna they think they know everything

              Footrpints are distorted by wet muddy conditions like you find in pnw forests >turns out to be human
              What do you think squatch even is smart guy

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                And local natives in the US can’t bring anyone or themselves to bigfoot because it’s just random hobos hiding in the woods and a few crappy videos of men in monkey costumes

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                We killed the natives who would know about where to find them with diseases in the 1500s idiot

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                All they saw was drug addled hallucinations and other tribes spying on them

                They thought there were shapeshifters because other indians wore animal skins to sneak around in the woods. But sure all the people in the US are missing out on all the hard bigfoot evidence and just getting hoaxes and human hair every time because they’re not brown enough to find a monkey. If it was real at any point, it was extinct before that hoax video was made.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >t.city bred bookworm
                Like I said so fucking typical. Most people in US and Canada live in towns or cities you fucking moron. Zoomers aren't out with their phones blazing trails thirty miles out from Seattle all day every day. Squatch isn't a fucking rare warbler you can see in the park it's a sapient hominid adapted for life in deep isolated wilderness which there are still plenty of if you'd actually look at a pop density map or even go outside on your own

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                There are millions of rural americans walking around the woods every day and thousands of hunters ready to shoot or photograph anything out of the ordinary and yet sasquatch is better at hiding than a 150 IQ serial killer hobo and the only thing to show up in 200 years of hard evidence has been a pile of shoddy hoaxes. Perhaps, it's not real?

                All you can do is make excuses. Oh people are too dumb and zoomie to find monkeys. Lmao.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Just as i was saying you have no idea of the scale of things because your world is four walls and a monitor. Sad. Rural is a relative term btw most hillbillies live only about fifteen minutes from the nearest horse town by car

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >we haven't found a single shred of hard evidence in over 200 years because people aren't in the woods enough!
                >bigfoot is magic and never leaves evidence!
                it's always excuses and more excuses

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Plenty of evidence as has already been said. Pictures video dna samples. You're just so set on squatch being a monkey so you miss the obvious that human dna in the middle of the fucking woods hundreds of miles from any road or town with no trace of camping equipment indicates a species of fucking human you absolute retard. But you're on your broken record Npc mode already so fuck you I'm out

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Plenty of evidence as has already been said. Pictures video dna samples.
                Show it, bitch. Your words are about as useful as eyewitness acounts about alien abductions.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you just admitted that bigfoot isn’t real and it’s just paranoid hobos without modern technology.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Imagine a thousand pound ape doing this with a 100 pounder boulder. If you found bigfoot you'd likely be dead and missing, and authorities would chalk it up to a cougar.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >This persons chest has a fucking boulder implanted in it....
                >must be a Cougar
                No one would be that fucking stupid. Cougars kill in a very certain way, anyone who has spent a good amount of time in nature can spot a Big cat kill. You would know this, if you were not a city slicker.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Funny enough plenty of people do end up missing in National Parks. Usually they're found in some weird place or if they're rescued alive they have wild stories... Must be all those murderous hobos living in Yellowstone, and all the acid 8yos are constantly doing, right? Lol.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You mean people...who don't know the area and are not really super in to the whole living in nature thing....get...LOST?!
                SHOCKING!
                It must be a 7ft tall bipedal Great Ape

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah because a bear would carefully remove the clothing from a child's body, without eating it, and then bury it a hundred feet up on the face of a cliff in a crevasse stuffed with twigs and berries you retarded mother fucker

                Notice you're the only one here saying ape

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >It's not an APE
                What is it then? A Bear Man? Werewolf? All reports of it but it firmly within the Primate family.

                Also go on a post a source to that story of some kid stuck in to a cliff face.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Not my job to be your search engine gay. Do your own research. That's what I hate most about you smug hylic gays you're the most incurious mentally stagnant fuckers there are. Le Black Science Man says APE TOO BIG TO LIVE ON ONE OF LARGEST CONTINENT WHAT ABOUT SAIL FOAMS and you nod your empty heads and the whole thing is settled as far as you're concerned. Hey what if you rented a cabin in the deep woods for a month and stayed there for a month. I'm sure you'll figure out what's throwing rocks against the side of the cabin and pounding on trees. Maybe you'll find some prints that are obviously fake because anyone can make a plaster cast or some hair that will turn out to be yours. Anyway eat shit and don't reply to me ever again you dumb bitch.

                https://i.imgur.com/MsZN6Jm.jpg

                Why do they REFUSE to acknowledge the existence of Sasquatch? Thousands of credible sighting each year yet they REFUSE. Why?

                Figure it might be an uncontacted tribe type situation where the gov doesn't want people fucking with them. If you look at maps on the west coast there are loads of weird wasteland areas that are probably like reservations. Sure it's an open secret in the right circles but there's no reason for civs to know about them because we'd just get killed or give them covid or w/e. Too much hassle.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I've spent whole summers out in Northern California in cabin out in the woods that was only accessible via 4wd, horse back, or hiking in if the roads washed out over the winter back in the mid 90s-early 00s. Never once did I spot anything. No rocks being thrown. Bears? yes. Boars? Yes. Hillbillies growing Pot? Yes.

                I also have done my research, Literally every single thing on the North American PRIMATE theory points them being primates, The Southern Brand is called Skunk Ape.

                Don't tell me, you are one of those insane gays that insist that are multidimensional beings that only exist on this plane of existence for a short amount of time?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >make claim
                >asked to back it up
                >get mad and stomp your feet
                one step above a cultist

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No. You have to convince me gay. Until then you are just a hare brained schizo loser on par with flat earthers.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >erm..... r/science debunked this

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            not an argument

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Better than the nothing you've got

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Try doing your own research for once
        no, gay, how about you make your own argument? oh i know why you don't, it's because you don't have one. you can't prove the existence of bigfoot because he doesn't exist. otherwise you would and you wouldn't be pleading for others to make your argument for you.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >countless evidence everywhere
          >doesn't count because errrr snopes debunked this...

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If it was just an ape there would be no problem.
    The problem is it's deeply connected with ufos and extra dimensional entities. Or demons, to keep it simple.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Go ahead and try to hunt a boulder hurling ape. More dangerous than a grizzly. When better batteries/solar panels are invented, some drones might be able to search for them.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *