Why do people love putting flowers and other cute accessories on pit bulls? Its like spraying perfume on a turd, and no amount of flowers will make it look like any less of a demon.
Why do people love putting flowers and other cute accessories on pit bulls?
>pitbull argument devolves into gendered bullshit
why are you all underage
i just want a big intelligent lizard
>Ban Assault Weapons
>Ban Assault Dogs
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/ban%20assault%20dogs/
Same fucking people
Shills trying to justify pitbull bans while pretending not see other breeds going the same way.
Arkansas
https://www.nraila.org/gun-laws/state-gun-laws/arkansas/
Alabama?
https://www.nraila.org/gun-laws/state-gun-laws/alabama
>mandatory sterilization
So you can still have them but your breeder is out of state. Ok. Big deal. All of those places are full of pitublls.
Then check these
>no guard dogs
>no weapons
>more brown and black people
Get it?
You are trying too hard.
American Pit Bull Terriers, American Staffordshire Terriers, Staffordshire Bull Terriers, English Bull Terriers are declared ''dangerous'' and they must be muzzled and leashed. Government tried to put tax law on these 4 breeds and owners rebelled and won.
APBT, AST, SBT and EBT are still considered ''dangerous'' and they still need to be muzzled and leashed.
For gun laws, like every other government as soon as she felt that she can squeeze without consequences she did. Kid entered school killed bunch of kids, day latter young man killed bunch of people in two villages (second shooting was a psyop, for the first not sure). So government used panic and fear among women (as always) and took weapons from men. People here are still armed and will be, my people are not pussies.
Learn what psyop and propaganda means.
Learn what smear campaign means.
Don't watch news.
Ignore female emotions.
Don't react.
Don't give them an inch.
Its so funny when europeans think they understand american geography
First off, most of those towns are very small
Second, the way american law works, state law pre-empted all of those laws and made them invalid and unenforceable. I work in WA and there are pitbulls everywhere. All owned by city libs with "in this home black lives matter" signs.
>Guns everywhere
>Pitbulls nowhere
GOD bless the United States of America
And FUCK s**bia
>be snapshot
>live in serbia
>lose all your guns
>https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/mass-shootings-serbia-gun-laws-weapons-amnesty-rcna89874
>at least you can still have pitbulls
>https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-that-ban-pit-bulls
>tell everyone else that pitbull bans will precede gun bans
kek
serbia: pitbulls everywhere, guns nowhere
Washington state law pre-empts BSL
"The state may not meet its burden of proof that the owner should have known the dog was potentially dangerous solely by showing the dog to be a particular breed or breeds."
https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=16.08.100
"Washington cities can no longer ban pit bulls and other dog breeds outright"
https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/washington-cities-can-no-longer-ban-pit-bulls-and-other-dog-breeds-outright/
Washington gun law...
https://www.atg.wa.gov/firearms
First they protect your pitbulls...
Then they take your guns? Huh? That's not what snapshot said would happen.
First they protect pitbulls, then they come for guns!?
So if snapshot is protecting pitbulls...!?
>You don't need a gun
>You just need a pitbull and a knife
>There is no Dana, there is only Zuul
Pitbulls so hideous. There are absolutely beautiful dogs out there, dogs that make your soul feel good to behold, dogs which took humanity thousands of years of work to create, which means the beauty not only lies within the animal, but in the mind of your fellow man that helped sculpt it. How can someone not appreciate this? How could such an ugly, misshapen breed become so popular so quickly? Do some people just look at them and see something of themselves in them?
Meh, they’re intimidating but they’re not ugly. I think the mixes are cute, I have a friend with a chi/pit mix and I wanna take it home.
I don't know, their smile is just too cute in my opinion.
That's Staffordshire Bull Terrier not pitbull
Also. pitbulls can't be blue
>one toddler with doggy treats please
like how women put on makeup to distract and hide from their true appearance
are pitbulls actually that bad? i've never really owned one. My brother owns a basset hound/pit mix and it's pretty adorable, but it seems like he's more of a basset hound and doesn't have much temper.
hate these. ugly ass breed. the only positive thing about them is they randomly maul peope
lmao did a pit bull fuck your leg and make your dad think you were gay for dog dick? is that why you're such a fucking dumb homosexual
(Talking to snapshot btw)
99% of pitbulls cause no problem whatsoever
Not even pit haters can deny this.
>statistically the deadliest breed, the most unpredictable breed that snaps randomly into "game" mode
>that attracts crackhead single moms and ghetto thugs
>cause no problems whatsoever
lol
yes, estimated 18 million pit bulls/mixes live in the USA
and at most you get a 1000 or so attacks
No men talks like that, no men scream about safety, no men talks about fake statistic made by a woman.
>not a real man if you hate on a shitty unpredictable child eating pit fighting beast
you're the one using a dog as a replacement for your dick
Notice how anti-pitbull ''memes'' are same as anti-gun memes
>shitty unpredictable child eating pit fighting beast
>you're the one using a dog as a replacement for your dick
No men talks like this
Then explain this:
The strictest BSL in the US is only in pro-gun, blood red republican states.
Blue democrat anti-gun states actually banned BSL itself.
Pitbulls aren't guns. They're just shitty animals. Retarded, unable to survive in the wild. Degenerated from god's perfect creation.They exist so superior creatures can laugh at and profit from their fruitless infighting.
Much like slavs.
Can you explain this? or will you just spam more propaganda, slope brow? What will it be, vodka sponge?
They're not the same at all, actually. Pitbulls are aggressive and unpredictable because of genetics. This is an objective fact.
>They're not the same at all, actually...
Literally same anti-men memes designed to ''pacifies'' (don't know if that is an actual word) men
>Pitbulls are aggressive and unpredictable because of genetics.
Pitbulls are prey driven and you literally know 24-7 what they want because of their genetics. They want to catch and kill animals.
>This is an objective fact.
Stuff I just said yes, stuff you said no. Women can't in to fact, logic and women tend to lie and exaggerate.
I'm not reading that. It looks very emotional. Control your emotions, be a man.
>control your emotions
>be a man
A man states his emotions as fact because if he feels it it can't be without a real cause. Men are, in fact, the only sex that actually has emotions. Mens emotions are honest responses to the world, unlike womens emotions, those are always fake.
What emotions drive you to spam pro-pitbull propaganda starting at 6:30 AM?
>Pitbulls are prey driven and you literally know 24-7 what they want because of their genetics. They want to catch and kill animals.
This is the only true thing you've ever written. A border collie's prey drive is modified so it's as strong as possible but they only chase animals. They chase children, women, and other dogs. "Herding" is just part of how wolves hunt. They corner animals to kill them.
>Dog bred to herd livestock herds dogs, children, and women
What does that tell you about the prey drive of pitbulls?
Didn't read.
but you answered the second question about if you act like a man or a woman
>Or do you just plug your ears, insist that you're right, and sink down to the level of basic insults like a frustrated housewife who can't argue and just wants it to stop?
answer: yes, you act like a bitch. lol.
>Get BTFO
>im not reading that!
Men respond to every challenge, physical and verbal. The art of debate was invented and perfected by men. The man states what he believes and other men are encouraged to question it. To be a man is to fight other men and do it himself. Words or fists. A man rises to the occasion.
Women flee or submit. They run from danger, they duck out of arguments and deny that there is even an argument just like they rock back and forth in a corner instead of fighting for themselves. "i didnt listen to any of that, you're lying, i am right, you're wrong, no one likes you, you're not a real man, stop talking, i am right, i am right, i am right, I AM RIGHT".
Which one are you? Do you state your beliefs? Do you respond to others in turn? Do you honor Athens and Sparta and harden your mind and body in battle against other men?
Or do you just plug your ears, insist that you're right, and sink down to the level of basic insults like a frustrated housewife who can't argue and just wants it to stop?
Only a pitard would be dumb enough to compare them to guns lmao
>people who own pitbulls have small penis
>people who have weapons have small penis
>real men don't need powerful breeds
>real men don't need guns
>THINK ABOUT THE CHILDEREN
etc...
That's only if you count the ones that don't kill, pits are problematic beyond just mauling babies. I live in an area where they a very popular, and the problem is they attract the absolute worst kind of people, low IQ enough to get a dangerous dog that could eat their kids, and too poor to buy anything that isn't a pit or a mutt. I've seen everything from pits being abused by their wannabe alpha owners, disgusting backyard breeders with 10 crying pits in the backyard, and pits running around loose in the neighborhood being a general nuisance. Not to mentioned dog fighting and how they fill up dog pounds.
I don't hate the dogs themselves as much as I just hate the culture and community surrounding them. Pits are the worst dogs to be put in the wrong hands, but those are the majority of the people who want them in the first place, fucking idiots.
Whats the story behind the supposed serb?
look up "opera snapshot" on tbharchive
my sisters pitbull attacked another dog and mauled my mum when she tried to intervene, she's in hospital to have a tooth removed from her bone
neither are willing to entertain the idea it's time to have him put down
I hope the other dog owner presses charges and settles this
>pitbull attacked another dog
>she tried to intervene
>get mauled
Lol, what does that have to do with bull-type terriers?
Google what is redirected aggression.
Your family is retarded for buying a fighting dog breed and trying to stop it from doing what it was bred for.
Akin to correcting a hound for sniffing and tracking behavior.
Note, that when you correct these instinctual behaviors, the result is always intense aggression.
you're absolutely right and it's why fighting dog breeds need to have restricted ownership
the owner is responsible for the dog and it's my sister who was irresponsible leaving him with my mum, not my mum for doing a normal favor agreeing to dogsit for her (I cant dogsit him, he'll kill my dogs)
the total shitbull death posters are more in the right than the idiots who think the current state of affairs with pitbull mutts everywhere in low income areas is fine
>$10000 - $30000 pitbulls
what world do you live in to be this out of touch?
I suspect it's bait but you could genuinely be this retarded
>serbian schizo spamming
Anyways
Total shitbull death
Total Shitbull Death
You lead extremely sad life
>pitshitter is esl
like pottery
Here is how dogsbite.org pumps up pitbull statistic
gun deaths are overwhelmingly white male suicides, but go ahead and believe your own headcanon if it helps you cope
If people are going to kill themselves, guns are a better way to do.
Pits aren't that bad, people just don't know how to handle them. Even if they rip off a child's face, they are usually willing to give it back.
>9 days ago
Pitbull go five seconds without trying to eat a toddler challenge: IMPOSSIBLE
Disgusting. Bloodthirsty. A breed we all know should never have existed.
WARNING
PITBULL MENSTRUATION THREAD COMPROMISED:
WARNING
ATTENTION ALL READERS:
THE OP IS A /misc/ TRANSLANT AND ACTIVE REDDITOR,
WHICH MAY NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE TONE AND CONTENT OF THIS DISCUSSION. PLEASE BE AWARE OF THIS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION.
ALL FIELDS
>Inconsistent identification of pit bull-type dogs by shelter staff
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26403955/
>Co-occurrence of potentially preventable factors in 256 dog bite-related fatalities in the United States (2000-2009)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24299544/
>The effect of breed-specific dog legislation on hospital treated dog bites in Odense, Denmark—A time series intervention study
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0208393
kabbalistic inversion
Daily reminder that immigrants are invading your countries and committing crime all while displacing you and you’re scared of a dog.
You mean the imported dogs that have eaten more than one white child in yurop this past month alone?
You use that same fucking image in all your spergy garbage.
None of what you psychos post is remotely grounded in reality. You're describing the actions of less than 1% of pitbulls. You look completely ridiculous and unhinged, and when the math smacks you in the face you always cower and shut the fuck up pathetically, or spew the most hateful, autistic messages about how you want people who disagree with you executed or about how you're the kind of sick, worthless homosexual who poisons animals confessing you're profoundly mentally ill.
no fucking way, it's more than half of the total fatalities?
No way, more than half of a really tiny number?
it's just interesting
Cars kill even more people than guns, so clearly we should ban them and start riding shitbulls to work from now on.
Yeah that’s what the anti-pitbull crowd is proposing.
Anti-shitbull chads just want pitcucks to own normal dogs instead of bloodsport breeds. Their shitbulls should be euthanized and flash-frozen to send to starving Best Koreans.
how many pitbulls would it take to pull this?
Exactly one XXXL American Bully with a (preferably black) toddler dangling on a stick as bait.
Owning firearms is an important part of our rights that was intended to ensure that the people wouldn't easily fall prey to government tyranny, while pitbulls contribute absolute nothing of importance to our lives while being a threat and all around nuisance. Its just simple cost/benefit analysis, and pitbulls have no benefit to justify the amount of people killed and injured yearly by them.
>Its just simple cost/benefit analysis
how about we apply that logic to everything then? should we still allow muscle cars that use copious amounts of petrol because they have older engines that aren't as efficient? should we just ban old cars outright? should young men be allowed to drive fast cars on the street? etc etc...
i'd prefer to take the risk instead of just randomly banning shit
Yes
Yes
No
Motor vehicles capable of exceeding 55mph should be illegal for public roads. Recreational machine gun ownership is preferable to car homosexualry. We already figured this out but big trucking companies suppress it.
ok now we know you're a complete imbecile and would give up the freedom of autonomy for people because you think their cars are inefficient and hurting the environment
freedom isn't just about guns it's about freedom of movement at whatever time you want
and yeah the freedom to own a pet, all pets are a risk like others have said they wouldn't want a chihuahua left alone with a toddler just like a pitbull
>cant speed
>MUH FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT
Drive your car on any road you want in any direction you want, and see what happens. Also stop paying for plates and let your drivers license expire.
Lol. And you whine about not being allowed to break the law? You could just keep an ORV without any limits, not even lighting requirements, for emergencies but nooooo gotta speed to the grocery store muh freedom. Fucking manchildren. Car homosexuals are cancer.
where in my post did i say speed? i just said freedom of movement a concept you are too autistic to understand
some people can't afford brand new ev's and or don't want to own them....
>how about we apply that logic to everything then?
No, we can just stick to man eating dogs, thank you.
Wrong, slippery slope.
Let’s stick to man crashing cars.
just saying if you let people get rid of things for "x" reason they'll start applying that reasoning to other things they dislike...
Guns haven't been used in any significant way to reduce abhorrent government actions in the US in modern memory.
Any recent severe restrictions of freedom imposed upon US citizens (particularly woman and gays) has been met with nothing less than jubilant glee by gun-fuckers. You do not care about personal freedoms.
>Guns haven't been used in any significant way to reduce abhorrent government actions in the US in modern memory.
Except it has, you're just too busy sucking cocks to give a crap
Rednecks holing up in their totally-not-communist commune against the police who want to stop them from marrying 14-year-olds is not the same thing as rallying against an oppressive government systematically removing the rights of your fellow man.
Remove africans from all statistics and see what happens.
Also no pitbull = nothing happens
No guns = you will find out what it is like to live in china or russia where rules like “work and goods cost money” can be handwaved by the state with no consequences. That’s why they always ban weapons that are more effective against troops and cops, not ones that are actually used in crime.
>source is from 2020, that year when nobody went outside or interacted with anyone or anything
Please shut the fuck up
Just make pitbulls require an expensive license to own that women and thugs can't get. Only make them legal for lion and bear tamers that work at zoos. If you're caught with one illegally they fine the shit out of you and shoot it on sight. Problem solved.
What are you gonna do next, ban knives?
>33 deaths
What a relief, I'm glad most attacks end in a mere mauling.
kek rightoids seething over this. no response whatsoever
If pitbulls should be banned, then guns should be banned.
If guns shouldn't be banned, then pitbulls shouldn't be banned.
Simple as.
Wow, someone with a brain. Rare sighting.
Guns don't break free and shoot autonomously.
Google accidental discharge. Your analogy is weak. You want to ban dogs for their “kill count” but care not about guns which kill more.
it's so easy to spot election tourists. their NPC subroutines simply go right down the line of culture war topics and just regurgitate talking points without stopping to think. the 80 IQ white trailer park trash that owns 2 pitbulls is more true to their beliefs than any incel crying to the government
>accidental discharge
Take the fucking bullets out and it won't shoot.
What
said, but also pitbulls dont 'break free', they are 'not contained well enough by owner'. Saying they just break free reduces responsibility.
Just as how kids don't just 'find' their daddy's gun cabinet and 'manage to' unlock it. The guns are improperly stored and the key improperly hidden by daddy.
Guns don't go off 'accidentally', someone fucked up somewhere down the line
>but doesnt that mean guns dont kill people and people kill people anon!!
Why yes. Guns are a very dangerous tool. Pitbulls are a very dangerous dog. Both can be used correctly or incorrectly. And if the general population cannot be trusted with pitbulls, then the general population cannot be trusted with guns. Get it?
If that's the case then eating food should be banned because obesity and heart disease kills more than guns and nagger dogs combined. Stop being a disingenuous little fag.
>w-well if that's the case then [insert something not even remotely comparable] then!!!!! Ch-check mate!!!!
Most first world countries that currently have obesity epidemics have, in fact, introduced lots of things in attempts to curb this so. You might be mentally handicapped. Get it checked out.
>comparing a weapon that must be delibrately used to kill to an animal who kills regardless of their owners wishes
>shitposting when defeated by logical arguments
Marcie or dalton will be killed by a pitbull while you watch and you won’t do anything because the pittie owner will pull a gun at the first sign of you hurting his dog and say your dog started it and needs to finish it
>pitbulls are safe if caged and muzzled all the time otherwise they are a gun that aims and fires itself
When guns this shitty are made we ban them from import
Comparing pitbulls to a shitty-made gun isnt entirely accurate. It's more like a very sensitive and complicated gun. If someone knows what they're doing and how to handle it, it works fine.
It's just for some fucking reason some stupid retard decided to tell everyone that this gun is amazing and great for beginners and never goes wrong unless YOU have broken it. Which is obviously ridiculous.
But then you say well let's ban this gun. But hang on. Plenty of people have this gun and it works fine for them, bevause they're not braindead, they know what they're doing.
And therein lies my point. If you believe pitbulls should be banned, then you believe guns should be banned. If you believe guns should not be banned, then you believe pitbulls should not be banned. Simple as.
you're fucking dumb
a steak knife can easily kill anyone but it's not comparable to a retarded autonomous shitbeast pit fighting dog in any way
nah bro you're the fucking dumb one. it's highlighting rightoid's hypocrisy when it comes to government control. guns are far deadlier, this is not an argument, but for some reason they want to ban a specific breed with a fraction of a fraction of the kill count?
A pitbull kills if you basically let it exist at all without being muzzled or caged. It is a living being bred to kill without provocation and can not be compared to an inanimate object.
An inaminate object that, by the way, WE OBJECTIVELY REQUIRE in order to remain a free people. If you have no guns, a fact as apparent as "things cost money" can be handwaved by the government. No guns? Absolutely no meaningful resistance can exist if they decide your labor will now be paid in "allowing you to be alive". Likewise for anything they deem mandatory for any reason. The only way you can get rid of guns and prevent this is to also disarm the government, which results in an armed government killing them and bringing is back to the original problem.
Guns are objectively required. Period. If you disagree, go be a russian mobik, or live in china, speak out about genocide or some other oppression, and serve 5 years as a wumao before losing your life and most of your organs.
Do we require pitbulls? No, they exist for sport. They are not a survival tool or a self defense tool. They are sporting equipment. Banning shitbulls is morally and philosophically closer to banning cars without catalytic converters.
>we need guns for muh tyrannical government
buddy the federal government hasn't had the interests of the people in mind for over a century. our rights have grossly eroded over the past 30 years and nothing has happened to change that. i can't afford to own a house where i grew up despite making 3x what both my parents earn. shit is fucked right now, america more and more feels like a 3rd world country given the amount of income inequality there is. i'm tired of hearing this argument that guns are for le rising up. this country doesn't have it in them anymore, they're placid consoomers. plus if they wanted the guns back, they would have come at 5am with a SWAT team and you'd be lit up with lead before you even knew what happened. stop fantasizing about being the next ruby ridge, the only thing you'll be is the latest MIGAtard that everyone laughs at on the national news.
or better yet: stop talking smack, nut up, and go blow up your local FBI branch office. what's wrong? is the best you can do is walking around a town square with tiki torches you conveniently bought at Home Depot with your trust fund money?
>they exist for sport.
guns exist for sport
>They are not a survival tool or a self defense tool.
people absolutely own pitbulls for home protection, are you fucking serious?
>They are sporting equipment.
so are guns lmao
>y-you're a libtard/commie/[insert new buzzword insult you learned from /misc/]!
nope. in fact i own 3 handguns and also support pibbles being banned. i just enjoy playing devil's advocate to your homosexual election tourists because you can't make a consistent argument to save your life
>we should ban guns because mass murder didn’t start over the affordability of luxury items
Didn’t read the rest of your retarded post
Go live in china. Say “I DONT CARE! GROW UP AND OBEY AUTHORITY!” Cry yourself to sleep. Then get drafted and die in taiwan.
Fun fact: The US will never hold another draft unless a western country is under assault because americans have been determined to be extremely likely to shoot the authorities.
>>we should ban guns because mass murder didn’t start over the affordability of luxury items
can't even address any of my points so he has to strawman. more predictable than my morning shit. you election tourists are all the fucking same
>nobody needs guns because nobody used them over…housing prices!
Yeah no.
We actually did ban that gun because of constant mass murder that literally no other gun could be used for and a lack of precedent for it being necessary for mass rebellion
It was called the select fire rifle
and now they’re using that as precedent for getting rid of a gun that’s nothing special for crime but does an excellent job against police and light infantry.
>we ackchyuyally did ban that gun
In the US? No. It's legal, you just need the right licensing.
Which, if that's what you're advocating for pitbulls, great! I agree.
>We actually did ban that gun because of constant mass murder that literally no other gun could be used for and a lack of precedent for it being necessary for mass rebellion
you didn't address his central argument either and instead focus on something irrelevant. you really are shook and have no response to the actual issue at hand
Read:
You do not care about people's personal freedoms. You want the inanimate object equivalent of this:
2nd amendment doesn't apply to biological weapons.
So youre saying we should get rid of pitbulls AND "urban dwellers?"
All western nations have pitbull bans (+ bunch of other breeds (guard dogs)) and they are importing black and brown people in masses.
It’s ironic, chances of getting mailed are less than half of 1% but spergs live in fear of these dogs. Just live right and nothing will ever happen to you.
Kek lmfao saved
>so what if the number of fatal attacks committed by shitbulls vastly outnumbers all other breeds combined, the number of people killed is not that high so it's n-not a big deal!
Most empathetic pitnutter
>"not fatal" means no one got hurt
>nevermind all the animals hurt and killed by shitbulls
Just kys pittranny subhuman.
Pitbulls ARE NOT 20% of the dog population. That is sourced from the most obvious site of propaganda lies. They counted every single shelter adoption as a brand new pitbull.
They are 6% based on puppy sales only. That puts them below retriever breeds and just above spitz breeds.
data manipulation is the favorite of the midwit when duping his fellows
it's not even that they through 10 different bully breeds into one category and call them pitbulls
imagine if you got all the herder breeds or all the retriever breeds and combined them they'd suddenly have staggering attack statistics
Lmfao absolutely fucking not
If you lumped all dogs period, ALL DOGS, together, you would have 1/3 the fatalities of “bully breeds”. How about all retrievers? 10 dead over 15 years? ALL collies? 1 dead?And keep your fucking revisionist language out of this. Every last one is a shitbull.
meme stats
>dogsbite.org ~~*''statistic''*~~
It's made by this lady
... by counting all of these as pitbulls
which parent breed gave them the powerful jaw and aggressive nature?
It started here
Various Bully, Mastiff and Hound breeds. There is zero APBT blood in those dogs.
>my controversial breed is not the problem
>we need to scapegoat all these other breeds instead
the full on pacifist never kill a single dangerous dog idiots are less retarded than you
Just follow the thread Buddy, nobody ever mentioned a single breed. Just a bunch of media reports of “pitbulls”.
yeah okay retard
???
>99% of pitbulls cause no problem whatsoever
True
>Not even pit haters can deny this.
They do, it's their job
Give me one good reason why this disgusting breed shouldn't be eradicated from existence
Like it or not, pitbulls were considered 'Americas dog' back in the day. Dog breeds are a form of heritage, and for them to go extinct due to irresponsible shits labelling them as 'nanny dogs' would be a huge shame.
Dogs a dogs a dog. I'm not a fan of the 'its the owner not the breed' rhetoric but it does hold some water. If a pit is in the hands of someone who recognises it's history and it's breeds proclivity towards aggression and actually works with the dog instead of being on a completely different plane of existance, then they can be decent dogs. The fault truly is with 'Pitmommies' rather than the dogs themselves. To see them gone would not solve this issue either. Pitmommies would move onto the next breed and do the same all over again.
>pitbulls were considered 'Americas dog' back in the day.
Never happened.
Pitbulls were used in pro-american propoganda during the 30s and 40s.
https://www.wlvt.org/blogs/montgomery/pit-bull-awareness-month-once-nations-wartime-mascot-breed-makes-comeback/
The source links back to some pro-pitshit website but the fact remains the same. The pitbull is a not-insignificant part of history and heritage.
Well of course you're going to use a fighting dog on the propaganda if you want to give the impression 'we're tough and up for this war'. That bears no relation to what Dogs were actually being kept as pets - the Bald Eagle may be an American Icon but most American families don't actually keep one of these, either.
>Give me one good reason why this disgusting breed shouldn't be eradicated from existence
hunting
>bringing a hairpin-trigger fighting dog hunting
>instead of the dozens of other breeds that are actually good at it
dude they have been bred for boar hunting for hundreds of years
they weren't exclusively a fighting dog
they can do other shit as well like protection work as well
like i get the reason you hate them is because leftoids try and make them family pets and see them as some kind of minority thing that needs to protected and you associate them with black people
but people use them for a variety of working tasks not just to be a pet to look tough
in the right circumstances they are perfectly fine dog to own
like i've said most of them that have been involved in attacks are people buying mentally damaged dogs from a shelter that shipped it in from some cruel south american country
stop shelters importing dogs to make money and you'll solve most of the attacks
also game bred dogs are supposed to not be human aggressive because the referee had to handle them same with conditioners and shit like that they are supposed to be wary of strangers but not attack them
a game dog breeders greatest fear is having his dogs stolen because they actually like people
Of all the way dogs are used in hunting, the way pitbulls and their mutts are used in pig hunting is the most retarded. In almost every case the dogs are a recreational device not an important food gathering tool, and eat more than they catch, but pitbulls take it to the extreme by risking their lives to kill just one pig very inefficiently and make the entire local pig population more wary and difficult to hunt.
Peak euro hunting larp, fit for a world where only 1/1000000 people is actually allowed to hunt and they're so rich they don't actually have to. Right up there with using a dozen hounds to rip a fox apart because you carry a salty genetic memory from your ancestor who was too lazy to keep chickens secured.
As a free man who values self sufficiency I'd rather have a dog that just found the pig and stayed out of the way, so I could shoot it without worrying about a dead/injured dog, because I am not a felon or a european and can therefore own lots of very nice guns.
i think you don't understand the terrain people are dealing with and even with bay dogs pigs wont stay still
and if you have no catch dogs they will quickly learn they have nothing to fear from the bay dogs and just go about their merry way
would you then suggest we use dogo argentino's?
imagine if black people found out about them....
also you acting like this is only some trophy sport and pigs aren't an invasive species
but that proves his point though, its just easier and faster to use a gun
the work they do is so inefficient and illogical that the only people who could do this wouldnt do this, because they dont have an interest in hunting, let alone hunting with an animal, and even then, you would need several dogs. its not like hunting badgers or foxes where you need to flush them out of the burrow with a dachshund or a jack russell, boars walk around above, so theres no need for a catch dog because youre not running around with a boar spear, just shoot them like a civilized person
>boars walk around above
yeah no shit and they are clever and aware of this so they hide in the most difficult thick terrain that is extremely difficult to get a bead on them like in the middle of literal jungle tier bush or a corn field
so it's easier to hunt them with dogs and have them catch the board so you can finish it off with a knife to the heart
If you’re a sportsman larper lmfao. Using dogs at all is a waste.
One single handful of corn and a chair 200 yards out. RIP piggers.
i'm not discounting the fact their is more than one way to skin a cat
yeah buts likes saying youre going to skin a cat with a rock despite having a knife on hand
no it's realising that it's important to have options depending on the situation
imagine putting corn out for pigs in the middle of a corn field?
If it’s a corn field use something processed so it’s more appetizing like roasted corn feed or meat. You may also get a yote.
Bait and shoot mogs every other hunting method. There is literally no reason to use dogs except to lead you to an area where it may be ideal to set your baits.
>You may also get a yote.
That's an interesting point what if you wanna get into coyote den?
Anon, wild pigs are an incredibly destructive an aggressive species, virtually everything is legal in hunting them. There are tourists who pay to go on tours because they let them fire at herds of the fuckers with machine guns. They're such a nuisance and so overpopulated everything is on the table. Efficiency is irrelevant at this point.
?si=d4hjMsN3RdVvGNME&t=57
hunt THEM >:)
It's a great metaphor for how whites handle blacks
shoo shoo incel
Make me, troll.
It's such a shame to see people who are otherwise pretty intelligent sink to 'BUT THEY WERE NANNY DOGSSSSS' just as a 'fuck you' to the british government now trying to ban XLs.
Don't get me wrong, I hate the Tories. Like, if they all died today I would personally take the time and money to travel to london to shit on their corpses in absolute glee and jubilation, hate.
But this? I don't think they're wrong for this. This is inarguably the smartest thing they've done in a good long while, and I'm glad that those tory cunts are actually sticking to a moral good for once.
The only issue I can foresee is that, as far as I am aware, XL bully was never a registered breed with the KC. So what 'counts' as an XL bully? There's no registration, no papers, no actual breeders to contact, so it will just be easy for some cheeky bastards to say that their Toddler-Mauler is a cross or some shit. Idk. I don't how how it could be enforced.
ok like i want a pitbull in the right circumstances i'd probably get a colby dog from a reputable breeder something kinda mellow i just think they are good healthy all round dogs probably not great guard dogs but they really can be super sweet they love pleasing their owners
i understand the high pitched squeals of children mimic in a dogs mind an injured small animal so they go into prey drive mode which is how the mauling's happen
but honestly i wouldn't allow any dog to be unsupervised with my child even a chihuahua (not that i have a child, maybe one day)
like what you are forgetting is all these shelters stay alive by shipping in dogs from other countries like latin america or eastern europe
many of these dogs are abused and fucked up as a result of dog fighting and shit like that but liberal women especially like adopting these dogs because they have a saviour complex for shit like that
and these dogs aren't like a game dog in the truest sense they are a bandog (american bully crossed with a game dog) so like mastiff with game dog so instead of just animal aggression you have human aggression (mastiff side)
so then they do the high pitched baby voice to the dog, bam the dog mauls them because it turns on their prey drive
a lot of projection going on in this thread i don't want a pitbull to show of i am the master of beasts and i am an intelligent person or some shit (everyone should train their dogs though lol) also i don't want a pitbull to look hard
i just think they are a good all round hardy breed that can do a variety of tasks
reddit spacing
too long wont read
have a nice day
reading is hard is it?
also if you want less pitbulls tell people to stop using the shelter system because they are shipping in dogs from south america and eastern europe
>reading is hard is it?
from the way you wrote your post i can tell you huff glue as a pastime
>also if you want less pitbulls tell people to stop using the shelter system because they are shipping in dogs from south america and eastern europe
supply and demand if they stop shipping dogs in then theyll resort to breeding, if you want less pitbulls people have to stop wanting those fucking things
If people wanted pitbulls so much why are the shelters full of them?
so you admit it's the shelters fault hence why it should be illegal for shelters to import dogs
that isn't true they just quarantine dogs for like a day or two at the shelter
Writing is hard is it?
>ok like i want a pitbull
>ok like
Starting a long ass post with that line lmfao.
Not reading. What a retard.
Unfortunate limp wristed homosexualry
Retarded dog rescues aren't even allowed to bring dogs in from overseas anymore because some were rabid on arrival lmao.
Pitbulls are super cute
What do you expect from people who dislike Bull-Type Terriers? They can’t keep a dog-aggressive dog restrained with leashes and collars and even go as far to lie and say they kill 6 million people a year. All they CAN handle is a small pointy eared play thing.
There is no such thing as a "bull type terrier". They are called pitbulls.
I dislike them not because I can't handle one (i could, with extreme prejudice, show those homosexuals who's boss, NO LOVE ONLY DISCIPLINE) but because everyone else who thinks they can, refuses to regardless of capability. And then I have to clean pitbull blood off my pants again. Already, my favorite pocketknife got all gritty because I didn't get all the pitbull out of the pivot. Sad! Maybe I should do as that navy vet and protector of huskies and keep a shotgun handy.
Cringe larp
No, there is indeed such a thing as a bull type terrier - a very specific type of terrier that was originally bred for bull-baiting. When bull-baiting was outlawed, these dogs were then bred for dog fighting, and that is how they got the bad rap they have today.
These dogs have been used for generations as working dogs, and have only recently been maligned by ignorant people like you. First of all, not all Bull-Type Terriers are prone to attacking humans – it’s only a small minority that has remnant bulldog blood.
>a very specific type of terrier that was originally bred for bull-baiting
i actually disagree with you i think pitbulls could be much older breed than we know their is some literature that says they predate the theory of the terrier being crossed with the bulldog to create them
The word pitbull has been used to describe a type of dog rather than a breed of dog since the 1920s if you’re revisionist scumbag you will disagree.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pit%20bull
i just think it's been around for at least 300 years maybe even older than that
It sad that animals that were bred for one role has been forced to adapt to something they weren't equipped for. That said
>First of all, not all Bull-Type Terriers are prone to attacking humans – it’s only a small minority that has remnant bulldog blood.
Biggest lie in the planet. My hatred for dogs and pitshits in particular come not from the internet, but from the amount of chasing and running away I had to do. They are dangerous animals not in this statistical way, but in the way that I can't take a walk in the woods without fearing a pitshit and his mommy are there, ready to skewer me
i think a cute accessory to put on a pitbull would be a 220 grain hard cast bullet to the temple 🙂
Test one out on yourself first 😀
You both should do it. Saves everyone the trouble of looking at two morons going at it in a thread. But, I guess it's too late for that, right?
You make 3
10mm?
Yes, underwood to be precise.
because pitbulls are a proxy war for black people
Trannies, naggers and homos do exactly the same shit, especially the mentally ill ones. Trying to force an association of their obsession with concepts that are commonly viewed as "good" or "nice", so that you then associate the "good" with whatever schizophrenic nonsense you'd wish to peddle, equating the two.
It's one of the most sorry and pathetic manipulative tactics you can witness, and the more obnoxious the topic, the more sad it is to witness this tactic used. Tactic itself is illicit and one of the lowest in the scale of honor, but the fact that someone uses it in the first place is telling you much more about the quality of an individual that steps to such lows as to employ those tactics in the first place.
It gives you not only insight about the individual who does it, but also at the culture in general of which he is trying to manipulate because again, the inverse relationship ships between the two opposite concepts and the Newton's law - every action needs opposite and equal reaction.
>Same thing as fat acceptance and overweight ‘super models’
What I’d the point of these constant ‘I hate shitbulls’ threads? Is there some meme in these things I’m missing and it’s really like toad lines?
Its the glue that connects all animal lovers and enthusiast. Whether you are a dog person or a cat person, a spider bro or a fish guy, or just a guy who likes capybara memes, we all hate pitbulls because we all have experienced shitty pitbull owners who live up to every stereotype.
Third world shit skins who fear dogs because they’re a meal to them in their countries.
Pits without their ears cropped literally look like dumb dogs. Some pure labradors even got literally the same skull and they are pretty dumb dogs.
Only intelligent dog breeds are Dobermans and Chows.
I like pitbulls. I'm not huge on the flowers or cutesy stuff aesthetic, but they're just a dog to me, and I'd rather have a pitbull than a Chihuahua given my experiences with Chihuahuas have all involved aggression whereas the two pitbulls I've lived with were sweethearts.
Honestly most pits are actually just mutts given there's no standards for the breed, and mutts are the best dogs because they're less turbo fucked by selective breeding.
found the shitbull lover. we see through you, fag
Found the retard that doesn't understand the difference between gameness and aggression
Other than the demonic smile pics, I just can't bring myself to find pitbulls hideous. It's just another dog to me. I mean, bears are dangerous as fuck too but I don't think they're ugly looking just for that.
>Lifted truck
>"Powered by liberal tears" sticker on rear window
>Open carry everywhere, even if it's just to pick up McDonalds or get the mail
>Wife puts flowers on dog and posts pics on social media
>"Hah, stupid dog" I quietly chuckle under my breath
>Wife makes me put on a matching sweater, my 'nice' pants, and makes me take off the gun so she can take family Christmas photos
>"I am the Alpha, the master of my domain, I'm doing this because I choose to" I tell myself as my wife brushes crumbs off my wrinkled pants.
>"The girls at the reception desk are going to love this" my wife says out loud
>Just another day for a lion among sheep
>wrinkled pants
>not tattered cargo pants from highschool
You're weird bro
Why would anyone want to own an ugly ass pit bull over something like a klee kai?
>why do people have different aesthetic preferences to me >:[
I don't know why someone would want a dog super prone to aggression over a dog that isn't, the whole beast master theory is pretty accurate though. But when it comes to 'this dog more attractive than this dog because I just say so' you sound like a narcissistic NPC.
m8 pit bulls are gross
If you want an aggressive dog get a German Shepherd
Wow, that's cute and pretty. Didn't know these husklets existed.
That dog looks like a chud.
What a faggy looking dog
He cute
Pitbulls are like $50 on Craigslist. Most other breeds go for at least $1k.
American Pit Bull Terrier cost 10 000 - 30 000 dollars (for proven dog) and 2000 for the pup
This never happened
>I like dog
>therefore bad dog thing never happens
kys homosexual
*Puts a heckin little hat on a death machine*
Heh, your bite and fatality statistics are now invalid you chud.
Name a more iconic duo than a fucking retarded woman and unneutered male pitbull with zero training.
because they're women on birth control whose reproductive drive has been hijacked to protect whatever they see as disadvantaged by "society" rather than their kin
Because the juxtaposition is funny. It's like a big, masculine, muscular, manly black man wearing a tiara and a pink tutu, so it's just a trope.
Same reason pretty girls get tattoo.
NPC love to mix beauty with uglyness.
Because it’s cool
Perfect example of the beast master comparison. Sandwiching a baby between 2 murder machines without it being ripped into flesh confetti is akin to the tiger trainer putting his head between its jaws to show how much control he has over the dangerous animal.
Occasionally pitbulls are cute. They look like fat headed retards, but sometimes their massive monster skulls look vaguely neotenous enough to be charming. The shitbull in that picture is not cute enough for that. There are ugly versions of normally cute dogs too, little bug-eyed beagles and german shepherds with a fucked up schnoz. It happens.
These are originally calendar photos made for an anti-bsl organization because breed specific legislation never works and never will.
>calendar photos
Who the fuck would pin such a nightmarish calendar on his wall lmao?
>nightmarish
scared of dogs? Weak men like you wouldn’t survive outside of your cement pod.
>breed specific legislation never works and never will
Breed specific extermination, on the other hand, works wonders and will work beautifully for pitbulls.
cause its cute and thats literaly lest intomidaring large dog bread wtf do you mean they look like silly Little hipos
Since ancient times the "master of beasts" has been a powerful concept in legends and iconographies across many different cultures, you can look it up. It's associated with power, might and control of the uncontrollable, i.e. the animalistic forces of nature. It can therefore also be found on ancient royal seals and coins.
Subconsciously pit nutters want to project an image of themselves as this potent master of beasts by showing their absolute control over dangerous animals like shitbulls, that's why they cutify them, let them roam around their kids etc., to show how mighty and potent they themselves are they figuratively castrate an otherwise dangerous being.
They won't admit this ofc, but that's kind of what's going on in their minds.
>Subconsciously pit nutters want to project an image of themselves as this potent master of beasts by showing their absolute control over dangerous animals like shitbulls
Perfect explanation. I've always said the main appeal of them is having a dangerous animal you can control, and if pits were as powerful and even-tempered as a Lab they wouldn't even be popular. Take away its power and predisposition towards violence and you're left with a ugly neurotic dog that most people wouldn't want.
>power
are pitbulls even that strong though? don't they get shit on 1v1 by quite a few other dog breeds?
well put. I think you hit on the source of it
If they're upper class it's the same reason shitlibs vote for mass unlimited immigration but don't want it in their areas while calling other people bigot, they're malicious, disingenuous, retards that wish to paint a false image of themselves to appear virtuous. If they're lower class it's
Hit the nail on the head for the "I want respect" type of owners that parade the dog in the streets like It's a gun they are flexing or muscles
this sounds like some buck breaking shit, the whole point of having a dangerous animal is to have a dangerous animal, not something you humiliate or for your amusement at its expense
big if true
>pit nutters
r/BanPitBulls
Idiot. Those words originated here.
This is from 2-3 years ago
That was just /misc/ and r/banpitbulls
This is Wauf and reddit
And same goes for every other anti-pitbull word, phrase, meme< It's all made by same people and it's posted by same people over and over again.
>shitbulls
r/BanPitBulls again
>SJW
>fears and wants to censor the drive to such power instead of punish those who let their dog maul people
Like clockwork. You should be able to own any animal that you can tame. But with taming it comes responsibility. And so what it does falls on you. But just because some retards get in over their heads does not mean we need to mollycoddle society and start banning breeds.
This is true.
Thats why pitwhores always brag about how its always bad owners and that REAL gigachads would spend their time tardwrangling a shitbull.
If your goal is to look tough a Kangal or Mastiff would be better. Not only are they less retarded, they would also body any shitbull in a fight.
>REAL gigachads would spend their time handling their dogs properly
Yeah
>If your goal is to look tough a Kangal or Mastiff would be better.
All men want to look tough, it's natural and every men should have real working dog
>Not only are they less retarded, they would also body any shitbull in a fight
That's not true and ''shitbull'' is reddit (r/banpitbulls) word.
The ''not true'' part here:
https://my.mail.ru/mail/scott_smit/
Photos and videos
>Every men should have a real working dog
Not a shitbull then.
Even slavs know it.
Shitbulls aren't working animals. They're closer to sporting equipment. Would you rather own a baseball bat (pitbull) or a rifle (german shepherd)? You could kill someone with a baseball bat, but the one with a rifle is going to kill more of the right people more reliably, even if the bat is technically "more reliable". The bat is also so simple, it could be replaced by a rock (and in the case of pitbulls, you could just beat whatever it is with a rock).
Sporting equipment.
>But an argentinian had a conspiracy theory
Argentinians are literally fucking naggers. They are wrong by default. Do you get all your opinions from people that can't maintain a civilization? You don't even have to go down the big list of logical fallacies or ask "if that bullshit is true why did most republican states ban pitbulls and bolster gun rights"
Beyond the "master of beasts/nature," from observation (so this is just my personal subjective take) there seems to be a trend of pit owners also needing to feel in control of their spouse. Whether it be a "she knows I'm the alpha of the house" or a "I can/did fix him and tame him."
So I wouldn't be surprised if that is rooted in the same subconscious desire to feel in control.
There's a difference between trying to hone or work with a strong force, and being utterly convinced of your own dominion over it.
You even see this with certain gun owners and car nutters.
The stupid are overconfident in their abilities and always hurt themselves or others with their hubris.
It's all a larp to feel cool, strong, and in control.
>muh gun owners
you nullified your entire post with that
a gun is just a tool
>"I know guns are a tool and I'm responsible, that means everyone is like me"
>"Certain gun owners bad == gun owners bad"
Good thing people don't wave them around on social media and rational behavior is indicative of all gun owners.
I feel much safer knowing that they're actually all in good hands as well as the fact that every gang shooting and child that grabbed an unsecured firearm is not only just overblown by the media, but all complete lies and no one has ever really been hurt.
Walking straight past the point and ignoring that my post made no moral judgement on any of the objects stupid people use irresponsibly to quite literally go "you said something that almost looks critical of gun owners, therefore you are wrong" is peak logic.
I'm fascinated that you've made it this long in society while utterly lacking the ability to read.
The difference is you require guns to be a free man, or the state needs to be disarmed.
Or try being chinese and just tell yourself that rebelling against the government’s commands is for childish retards and its moral to admit that you owe it to them to be their chattel property.
Yeah, and I require a car to get to work, but I'm not going to pretend like there aren't retards swerving through traffic in their WRX at 95mph.
What's your fucking point? That because they're necessary that means idiots aren't idiots with them?
That because they grant us freedom, no one can dare mention someone being a homosexual with them?
Quit being a sensitive little bitch about it.
Act like an adult and acknowledge when other people are dumbasses, even if it doesn't shine the things you hold dear in a perfect light.
It looks a hell of a lot better to just own that you think the good outweighs the bad than to cry and plug your ears like a child if someone doesn't immediately paint them as divine gifts only given to the righteous that are incapable of ever being used improperly.
As a reminder, the conversation thus far has been:
>Idiots hurt people when trying to be cool with things that are powerful, dogs, cars, and guns alike
>"You said guns. Opinion discarded. I don't use guns improperly."
>So because you don't, it doesn't happen?
>"We need them. Something something China is authoritarian."
So you haven't explicitly acknowledged that idiots do sometimes misuse guns (although that's implied with you moving the goalposts), you can't seem to let go of the gun thing to acknowledge the initial point, and you just want to keep making this about your fixation.
You don't have to reply, but at least admit to yourself that you saw guns mentioned and sperged out to jump to their defense against a comment (which wasn't even critical of them) that was continuing a discussion about pitbulls and the handful of shitty people who like the power they give but don't treat that power with the respect it deserves.
Because they are stupid cocksuckers.