Why do animals show homosexual behavior?
It has always confused my mind, ok gay animals exists but why
Why do animals show homosexual behavior? It has always confused my mind, ok gay animals exists but why
Why do animals show homosexual behavior?
It has always confused my mind, ok gay animals exists but why
This site has ads? wtf are you people talking about. I have never seen an ad on Wauf(nel).
kek
they get pulled 5 minutes after they get bought
then why have i been seeing the same ad in my local language every fucking day for the past few weeks? please message bidgear about doggy cookies so i'll stop seeing this bs ad every time i'm on the shitter.
>not blocking ads on your phone
That's not the dogfucker way
I can only message advertisers I see
right now I don't see any.
there's literally nothing wrong with zoophilia
Shhh, if the Karens find out, there will be one thing wrong with zoophilia.
advertisers hate the n word more than someone saying doggy cookie, so let me send a screenshot of this post to the advertisers.
Because nature is incredibly chaotic. It's easy for us logical humans with our logical brains to want to fit everything into boxes and spreadsheets. Nature exists to continue to exist right? Evolutions end goal is to continue right? WRONG. Evolution has no goal. Nature has no motivation. Things just are. Appreciate them while they're here.
>bleed the nation dry
wyoming ranchers have never contributed a buck to the nation so they don't get a voice in what happens to our wealth.
We farm your beef, mine your coal, and refine your oil but alright enjoy that $10/gallon gas. What does the majority (service industry city fags) do besides bolster the GDP by being paid to pour coffee, or if they’re lucky, make some irrelevant video game that actually detracts from society?
Horse fucking coal miner > moralfag barista tbh
I live right south of you and Colorado mogs you on every single front except animal fucking.
when it comes to fucking unsuspecting farm animals, wyoming wins hands down.
The state with the giant blue horse dick? You’re just south wyoming. Most of you come up here for no apparent reason bringing dogs and horses too.
They’re smarter in general lmao lol kel haha
Unlike the average denver resident.
>Most of you come up here
oh lord you need to come visit and see how many of us there are now
you have no idea. My tiny mountain town has more visitors each day than your state has residents.
>I've literally NEVER seen a poster banned for bestiality bullshit on Wauf.
that's because you don't actually track posts to see what's deleted.
if there's no response you'll never know what got deleted. What you need to do is read every post that offends you and memorize them. Then check back constantly so you know which ones disappeared.
————————————————
EVERYBODY ABOVE THIS LINE
Wyoming expert here. Only 17 people in the state have fucked a horse. Most of us fuck bison. It’s on the flag ffs.
I believe it, most Wyoming locals smell like bison.
Look, I am not some feminist cunt who cries rape because some ugly guy winked at them - sexual assault - because that is what it is - is not only unnatural from the vast majorities position it is also responsible for the some of the worst public health crisis in history. You have innate control over an animal and are 'preying' on it. There are adult humans with Stockholm syndrome who will scream bloody murder they love and adore their captives and abusers. That the animal is not biting, kicking, whatever to prevent your action is not indicative of it being something that should be tolerated.
It is evil. It is not 'puritan' to observe it. Puritan would be anyone who baby talked to their dog being arrested and charged with animal cruelty.
Evil should not ever be tolerated. It should be destroyed.
'Dogma' and 'Normie' belief be damned. You deserve a bullet in order to reduce the amount of evil in the world.
>inb4 thou shalt not kill
It's SHALL NOT MURDER - murder is to kill unjustly. This is just.
>is not only unnatural from the vast majorities position
Observable in nature, ergo OBJECTIVELY "natural". Further proof that the "vast majority"'s opinion is worth shit because the vast majority is functionally illiterate.
>it is also responsible for the some of the worst public health crisis in history
Such as? No AIDS didn't come from shagging monkeys. No syphilis didn't come from shagging llamas. What else?
>You have innate control over an animal and are 'preying' on it.
You are literally incapable of conceptualizing mutual love between human and animal. Try having an animal first before shittalking the concept, cunt.
>There are adult humans with Stockholm syndrome who will scream bloody murder they love and adore their captives and abusers. That the animal is not biting, kicking, whatever to prevent your action is not indicative of it being something that should be tolerated.
"I don't see rape everywhere... but look since you're physically capable of raping somebody that means you're literally a rapist"
>'Dogma' and 'Normie' belief be damned. You deserve a bullet in order to reduce the amount of evil in the world.
You want to shoot me before you even gave me room to argue back. Are you a commie?
the real question should be
>why are humans the only species showing homophobia?
Homosexuality is a genetic variation of a spectrum on complex species. And there is never 100 percent gay, there could be 0.1 percent straight or even bisexual with different tones. There are as well lesbian animals, in the same degree as gaynimals.
Every animal species with homosexuality don't really give a fuck and adopt (by either rescuing orphans or hunting babies from the worst parents they could find). Every species except humans, because we're a bunch of retards that feel like we were eviscerated alive if two guys kiss, hug and have sex together; we feel so hurt for that shit we just pick an AK-47 and massacre an entire gay bar and post a giga chad on an image board the day after.
>Two way street, retard.
>I fuck animals
>also I'm a racist and homophobe
that's not the 2 way street you think it is.
Nobody is surprised when an obese nazi basement dweller can't get laid with humans
>also I'm a racist and homophobe
I merely paraphrased the complaints of alt righters. The people who condemn zoophilia aren't "your bros" at all, they're easily impressionable NPC sludge.
>Nobody is surprised when an obese nazi basement dweller can't get laid with humans
Oh the irony.
>I merely paraphrased the complaints of alt righters
alt righters are the people fucking animals.
>What if they can, and just don’t like them as much?
not sure what to tell you about that. If you're born to fuck something society will lock you up for maybe consider being less selfish and control yourself. But that's a real problem if it's true. I guess you're a fucking monk. Your reproductive urges are completely useless so you should learn to ignore them. Maybe get neutered.
>alt righters are the people fucking animals.
Just making shit up at this point lmao. I broke the NPC, pls give me a new one.
>things can't be irrationally illegal
>law and morality are basically the same thing
Kinder eggs are literally terrorism
>Just making shit up at this point lmao.
I don't find dog fuckers outside stormfront 2.0 here
and I assume the only reason dog fuckers and nazis are on the same site is because they're unlikely to be prosecuted here. But I'm also going to assume the dog fuckers are in fact also nazis or the two groups wouldn't put up with each other.
>On the stormfront 2.0 website I don't find dog fuckers outside stormfront 2.0
Hmm I guess that means that all dog fuckers must be nazis!
>Hmm I guess that means that all dog fuckers must be nazis!
keep reading
all I see is dog fuckers saying nazi shit and zero nazis arguing with them.
>be less selfish
Yes we need as many kids as possible. The war to retake jerusalem is burning through bodies fast.
Pls we need a 2 child policy for whites and a 0 child policy for everyone else.
>Yes we need as many kids as possible.
sex has almost nothing to do with reproduction.
nobody wants dog fuckers to reproduce anyways. We just want them to stop fucking dogs.
You don’t have a relevant argument. What you want or think has no bearing on them and how many horses they fuck should have no bearing on you.
>You don’t have a relevant argument
yes that's what I said
almost everyone in the US agrees you should be in prison
no further argument is required.
>you are bad we all hate you t. one guy
You were literally programmed not to even think about this subject. Masturbation used to be as despised. Do you know why? Because access to sex is the primary way society controls you.
>Masturbation used to be as despised.
and when it was, you would have been wrong to do it.
>I support the current thing: the post
if you have no morals the only thing that matters is popular opinion
dog fuckers have neither morals nor popular opinion.
>If many people think i should die, then it follows I should buy many bullets to remind them to mind their own business.
if more than one person thinks you should die, it's not going to matter how many bullets you have
you probably can't even deal with one person.
>if you have no morals the only thing that matters is popular opinion
>dog fuckers have neither morals nor popular opinion.
Literally a nonsequitur
Do you have a disability?
if morality is the same thing as popular opinion
and you lack popular support
you also lack morals
better, retard?
>morality is the same thing as popular opinion
These fucking hylics I swear.
People with soul are capable of having a morality different from popular opinion, but of course you wouldn't know that.
>People with soul are capable of having a morality different from popular opinion,
it's weird how their morality always agrees with their preferences and never condemns them, no?
back in the good old days morality generally denied people their own preferences. How weak you gays have become.
Morality also gratified others preferences, based on the opinions of some primitive druggie shamans.
Pick up a sword or you have no moral standing. Sit idly and wait to see what the afterlife thinks of it.
>Pick up a sword or you have no moral standing
my weapon is the M16 A2 service rifle and I can easily pith you from much farther away than 500 yards with one.
fucking dogs doesn't deserve a death sentence. But society agrees a few months or years getting fucked in the ass by convicts of all colors is fine.
Society can come get mowed down until I run out of G3 mags, herr npc. They won’t, and never have. They have never even been able to catch anyone except retards, abusers, sadomasochists, and exhibitionists which explains their ignorance quite well. Well, if i were in charge of catching child abusers, i would develop a distaste for straight men and not trust them around any women at all
>if i were in charge of catching child abusers, i would develop a distaste for straight men and not trust them around any women at all
men are rarely trusted around children
>They’ve never tried.
thousands of you go to prison every year without a shot fired.
you talk big but when you get caught you just wander off to jail.
>thousands of “you”
Animal swingers, porn producers, abusive partners, impulsive fuckers, all easily caught, and common, because that is NPC male sexuality without societal control restraining it, really. That’s what you are too, without that nagging
>what would other people think? then I wouldn’t get laid.
So I really don’t care what you think. I don’t see more like me, i see what happens when you try to be me.
>it's weird how their morality always agrees with their preferences and never condemns them, no?
Since concepts like guilt and regret exist, no.
>back in the good old days morality generally denied people their own preferences. How weak you gays have become.
By your own admission morality changes with time as popular trends change. If you base your morality on shifting popular trends, then you're literally not even human, but a braindead zogbot.
>By your own admission morality changes with time as popular trends change.
yes. but if your morality only supports you it is probably wrong because nobody behaves perfectly in line with their morals and morals are not generally masturbatory.
>If you base your morality on shifting popular trends, then you're literally not even human, but a braindead zogbot.
morality isn't real.
what fake shit do you base your "morals" on? The bibble? fucking retarded.
>But also nobody would volunteer to die because someone fucked a dog.
no need
if 325 million people want to put you in prison, not one of them will die.
>yes. but if your morality only supports you it is probably wrong
If the majority couldn't be wrong, then how did the majority's morality change in the first place?
>morality isn't real.
Hello? Tech support? Yes, he's contradicting himself again.
>then how did the majority's morality change in the first place?
has it changed?
we have some 4000 year old books saying don't fuck animals and people now all agree?
>we have some 4000 year old books saying don't fuck animals and people now all agree?
The same books are also saying don't fuck your same gender and now a lot of people don't agree.
>The same books are also saying don't fuck your same gender and now a lot of people don't agree.
yep
apparently fucking your dog is far more disgusting to normal people than choking on cock or licking some dude's hairy asshole.
>That’s what you are too, without that nagging
you have no idea what I am.
but I'm not going to prison while you are.
>apparently fucking your dog is far more disgusting to normal people than choking on cock or licking some dude's hairy asshole
Both are gross. Missionary while handholding is good.
>apparently fucking your dog is far more disgusting to normal people than choking on cock or licking some dude's hairy asshole.
And if 20 years later society decides that fucking your dog actually isn't disgusting, you'll cheerfully wave the dogfucker flag on the city square parade and claim that it wouldn't have happened without your support
You're the one who brought up "normal people"
>you'll cheerfully wave the dogfucker flag on the city square parade and claim that it wouldn't have happened without your support
I don't wave any flags
I merely inform you (as you already know) that most people want you in prison and no "moral" or rational argument will change that.
Who cares? They have a hard time catching anyone I don’t like either.
You should care because with your soulless system of “morality” anyone could be next. Atheists, for example, are just fucking disgusting. Something is seriously wrong and they are all fucking hideous and mentally ill. Most people agree that atheists should be locked up. Those degenerate selfish fuckheads are just plain evil.
>You should care because with your soulless system of “morality” anyone could be next.
you think an atheist doesn't know this?
>Most people agree that atheists should be locked up.
wrong
fucking your dog will get you locked up
atheism will not
dog fuckers are hated more than atheists, and that's a lot.
It does not matter what NPCs are programmed to do now. What matters is anyone with the right power can make them do whatever. Morals are a check against this and you have none. You are a coward, not even half a man, you have no thoughts but what you have been tols to have because you are afraid of ever being disliked. You are the definition of an incel or beta. Even christians truly believe in an unchanging faith. You just do what you can to avoid being beaten up. I can tell you were bullied in school, or maybe you’re just a woman.
Women live their lives in fear and can’t consent to anythkng because men are too superior. Soon everyone will agree that heterosexuals should be locked up.
>It does not matter what NPCs are programmed to do now
unless you go to prison for it and can never get a job because of it
They said the same thing about a fucking plant
>They said the same thing about a fucking plant
yep
they still do about a couple other plants
and maybe some toads
and mushrooms.
Not him, but we'll just see if dogfucking is in the elite agenda. I'm sure it will be.
Apparently people have been told to think certain things. The media is inundated with it:
GAY SEX IS GOOD
ANIMALS ARE EXACTLY LIKE CHILDREN, YOU DO NOT NEED A FAMILY
You will be in a series of recreational sexual relationships and to have them you will hold the Right Opinions. You will not have a family, because families can develop their own Right Opinions. If you break from this in any way and can form your own opinions without being punished, you need to be punished for breaking from it. Why do you think divorce is so easy yet damaging? Why do you think birth control pills reduce instinctive pair bonding? Why do you think the media forces insane beauty standards?
DO NOT HAVE A FAMILY. DO NOT SEPARATE FROM THE RAT RACE. CONTINUE HAVING THE RIGHT OPINIONS TO HAVE MORE SEX.
Zoophiles deny that animals are children. They are as dangerous as tradfags.
gay sex is accepted because about 3% of people engage in strictly gay sex and about 7% engage regularly in occasional gay sex. And with those numbers, EVERY FAMILY HAS A GAY PERSON THEY LOVE
Dog fuckers apparently are a much lower percentage, and not every family has a dog fucker they love. In fact almost no families do.
so dog fuckers get to go to prison because nobody loves them.
He’s an NPC that can’t into ethics of course he’s too stupid for these topics. People like him only deal in violence and they are only dealt with in violence, which is why we developed bureaucratic governments and regulated police forces. However the cultural stain of the good book has yet to fade and the hebrew accelerationists that monetarily and culturally own the west aren’t helping.
They have morals, and public opinion is irrelevant. If it has no bearing on your life and no one is harmed, stay out of others business.
>you can’t deal with one
I don’t think you’re familiar with the lightning link.
>They have morals, and public opinion is irrelevant.
public opinion is literally the same as morality.
No, even if you’re stirner, no. Firepower is. This is the root of war. A million zulu had their opinion but the brit’s lead shot made a more compelling argument.
If the mortal toll is not worth proving the moral then the moral is not that moral at all is it? If you would not lead a hundred men to a machine gun nest for it, it can’t be that big of a deal. You just have a bunch of whiners.
young people choose battle while old people argue philosophy.
this is why many young people never become old people.
regarding the argument at hand, there aren't enough dog fuckers in the US to win any war.
But also nobody would volunteer to die because someone fucked a dog. They’d see the dog wagging its tail and turn around.
I’d like to see someone actually try and lead a military assault on some deviants or another. It wouldn’t be long until bullets flew both ways, and predictably, the deviants willing to shoot back would outnumber the outraged.
If many people think i should die, then it follows I should buy many bullets to remind them to mind their own business. Or maybe wage a generations long campaign to subvert society and castrate their children like the fags did when people kept taking issue with their isolated and clandestine activities.
you are arguing with an npc he doesnt have an argument because he just recites his programming on autopilot. this is how 90% of “humans” work and why there is no morality without religion aka then ultimate NPC program
>this is right, that is wrong, you can’t prove or disprove it but if you disagree you will suffer for eternity
and religion only works because NPC minds aren’t complex enough to consider other religions without having a violent, confused, angry fit
>you are arguing with an npc
I'm an atheist.
amoral
I think moral arguments both for and against are bullshit.
but I know for a fact most voters want you locked up in prison getting your ass raped daily for whatever reason.
and to me that's reason enough to do it.
Atheists are the biggest NPCs. Their religion is whatever they last heard. Hence they fucking love science and when other people think for them in general.
>Their religion is whatever they last heard.
>i have a religion so everyone else must also
shallow thinker
religious are retarded but retards are the future
What if they can, and just don’t like them as much?
>muh OWS
Imagine thinking a bunch of fat burgers screaming on the streets did anything of importance
>Imagine not knowing about the wall st bankers having home invasions and causing entire new departments within governments in every 5 eyes country to be opened up to fight it.
>Imagine thinking OWS was just the hippies with nothing better to do that sat outside all day getting high and chanting
>Imagine being so literally ignorant and lazy that government published spending and inter departmental organisation is not public available information in most European countries, US, Canada, Australia and so on.
>Imagine not being old enough to have seen the switch in political landscape and media in real time from 07' to 12'
>about the wall st bankers having home invasions
Right and how many of them have been killed?
Yeah the phile/sadist distinction. Of which the ratio is 1:1000.
>le homosexuality is le bad.............................WELL IT JUST IS
4chan logic
You got good answers and you didn't like them so you made a stawman.
Reminder that zoophiles have been a more benign presence in society than gays, and even deviant straights, so long as you subscribe to the zoophile/zoosadist segregation (aka autist/deviant normie, of which the ratio is 1:1000)
B-but muh bible
I'm glad you're basically admitting you're doing us all a favor and taking yourself out of the gene pool.
OP here: So what i have gathered from all this shit show is that animals can be gay because They are just gay and they like bussy (sexual impulses) and sometimes it could be just behavior phenomenons
Now can you all stop arguing like if you want to tear each other's faces?
OP, a gay retard? well, I never!
It's MUCH more complicated than that, just like in humans. Humans need to remember you didn't invent shit. You didn't invent pain, or fear or empathy or caring for offspring. The fact is, most humans depersonalize animals, then accuse others of "anthropomorphising" them when we remind you that humans invented none of the shit humans think make them special.
gays, trannies and pedophiles should be gassed.
>and pedophiles
Oy what you got against muslism m8
homosexual behavior is not the same thing as being gay
the difference is how often and how exclusively the animal engages in homosexual behavior
most animals engage in homosexual behavior because they hump anything that looks like their species and a few things that don't.
almost no animals engage ONLY in homosexual behavior.
That's incorrect. There are a number of accounts of purely homosexual animals. What animals DON'T have is gay pride parades and drag queen story hour and letting males into all-female prisons to immediately commit about half a dozen rapes.
>That's incorrect.
you still don't know what "almost" means, huh retard?
learn to read before you respond to me again.
poor minority problems
even then it's extremely rare
>poor minority problems
Poor brown people are way more likely to have the natural family unit. It's almost like they lack the wits to deviate and compete within the in-group.
strict homosexuality is equally rare across all races and economic backgrounds.
only poor people and minorites are scared of it.
I'm rich and white, and I consider exclusive homosexuals failed trannies who should not be called men. I'd rather be a horsefucker than anything more queer than a little bi.
>I'm rich and white,
it's like when you pretend to be a conservative researcher.
everyone knows you're lying because you have poor person attitudes and dumb person biases.
there's a reason rich people aren't scared of the gay just like there's a reason research scientists aren't conservatives.
If you just claim to break that stereotype without understanding why it exists, you look like you're larping.
>Pop sci article told me republican bigot dumb on average ok so smart people all believe in teh lgbts
You will, one day, touch with grass. But not today apparently.
Cultural biases associated with class, especially class filters like hideously overpriced tertiary education do exist and can be quite dramatic but they are biases, not laws of nature.
>Pop sci article told me republican bigot dumb on average ok so smart people all believe in teh lgbts
ask anyone that's got a STEM degree since you clearly don't.
>I just think they're gros and mentally unstable.
everyone is.
>everyone does
Fixed
I don't want to think of a straight dude having sex any more than I want to think of a gay one. It's all gross.
>You have to think of the man for both
>I'm not gay, I swear
>You have to think of the man for both
>gay couples
you might be stupid
virgin detected. so you think of yourself having sex with a hot girl as gross? If not gay that seems very autistic.
>Scared of gays
Not him, but I just think they're gros and mentally unstable.
I'll be honest. I've seen this "animals do homosex ACTS but aren't REALLY homosex" so many times I didn't even read the last part of the comment.
That's just a fancy way of saying you have no argument.
>I've seen this "animals do homosex ACTS but aren't REALLY homosex" so many times I didn't even read the last part of the comment
weird since you insisted on calling a post you agree with wrong.
I'll help you out
"Almost never" means:
A. Never
B. Sometimes
C. Often
D. Always
give me your answer and we can discuss how stupid you are.
This is a trick question
I already know you can't understand what "sometimes" or "often" mean any more than you know what "almost" means. You're incapable of understanding these ideas because you are retarded.
If I say "almost never" and you think that means "never" you are a retard
I big stupid fucking retard.
why are you on Wauf, retard?
not even humans, seriously, it's a very modern phenomenon created by the lack of a need for a wife and the lack of utility of a son
a son will not carry on your name or legacy, he will sell it to buy toys, and a wife will rob you. thus ended the justification for heterosexuality until humanity loses its intelligence.
Because nature isn't a calculating utilitarian white upper class 15 year old.
Because there is an instinct, not directly to reproduce, but just to satisfy sexual impulses (which will eventually end in reproduction).
If the impulse arrives when there isnt any available female around then they will reach for each other.
I just don’t understand why these zoo morons isolate 2 male birds on their own and then people are absolutely dumbfounded when they pair up. Why not just get a pair of females for them or a flock?
they aren't isolated, there's females too
That’s not homosexual behavior, that’s a son nuzzling his dad.
Animals are also subject to mental illness and degenerate behaviors.
I didn't know animals were religious
And yet I did not mention one thing about religion or gods in my post.
Absolutely rent free.
Only people who fall for garden gnome memes directly or indirectly think homosexuality is wrong.
It's literally deviant behavior. Cope and seethe.
>it's not normalgayry
oh geez oh no
Deviant does not mean bad. Occasional homosexuality can be beneficial, like it was in ancient greece. You fell for the christian idea of a natural order.
not gonna read any of that made up bs lmao
Same reason you're a chud. Reality is what (You) want it to be, and not what it actually is.
I thought lefties we're in to long walls of text. You always post them in your memes.
It's actually true of later greece, before it fell. Hating homos seems to precipitate the collapse of civilization. As we can see from the modern west, it has always been in a state of collapse.
its because homo hate correlates with the objectification of man as a resource for society as that is the primary rational reason for it. it's a transition from being a free animal to being the chattel property of the social class above you. you shall not do that, you are not maximizing your potential utility as the next labor force down. stop wasting time. produce more warriors and workers.
so you could say it's chud society. you will never be a real insect hive.
Le free thinker here
>4 days after an entire month for fags
>Been slowly pushed for 30+ years, and in the last5-10 (the extent of your memory) it's been ramped up
>Hating leads to collapse
Actually it sounds like the love and celebration of mentally ill people leads to collapse.
It's only being ramped up as an aggressive counter to hating them for no good reason. You can't destroy a part of human nature, and you refused to live in peace with it, so now it will destroy you. Again and again until you learn to just let them be and never give them a reason to be so aggressive. In case you haven't noticed, pride isn't about exalting fags. It's about destroying straight christian masculinity and making it shameful and morally wrong to imply that being gay would not be preferable to being straight. They hate you and are going to take all of your society down because of it. Meanwhile in other, more stable societies, people fuck dudes, it's kind of weird, but it's not a big deal.
>For no good reason
There are tons of good reasons to hate them. They carry and spread sexual diseases and advocate for child sexual endangerment. A regular person, with no prior propagandizing instinctively feels disgust towards them. This is why "muh uneducated redneck hicks" hate fags
>a part of human nature
I agree, individuals with high mutational load will always be a problem in civilizations that care about quantity over qualify because they just need workers. But we don't solve it by celebrating them, we actually do the complete opposite.
>pride isn't about exalting fags
It absolutely is. If this shit is natural, there would be no reason to push it, and no reason to "celebrate pride."
>Meanwhile in other, more stable societies
Which societies? Not the western ones that you say are dying, and not third world shit holes like India or Iraq. Something like China? They hate homosexuality so much there that western movie complies who love Chinese money take out gay scenes they want to push so badly on the west to appease them.
>There are tons of good reasons to hate them. They carry and spread sexual diseases and advocate for child sexual endangerment
HAHA
Holy shit
Look at him. Look at him and laugh.
>No argument
Thanks for the free W, child molester.
>words words words
The left can't meme.
Why do so many animals do it then?
Most animals are degenerate and wicked in the eyes of God.
He was calling religion a mental illness anon
These are bot posts.
Ur mom is a butt post
Chistardation. Some retarded heebs without running water feared it, so despite objectively superior civilizations having no issue with it, it must be wrong. The wages of following your false god? A self fulfilling prophecy. The gays upon oppression went out of their way to be as aggressively degenerate and destructive as possible out of spite. Now your children will grow up in a world that subconsciously believes being trans is always preferable to being normal. Lol.
The true gods were not merciful in the least.
Cuz dat bussy fine af
giwtwm
Why don't female cheetahs form groups?
human men become nervous if you approach them with a group
EWWWW gross haha please don't post more gay cheetahs that would be so awful haha
And people wonder how Hitler rose to power.
He posted gay cheetahs?
The majority literally got tired of sexual deviants.
Yeah I'm pretty sure the economy being in the dumps had nothing to do with it, it must've been teh fags
Oh it had everything to do with it. They're related. Weimar was a society controlled by the same thing as America: white and gnomish upper middle class liberals who never faced consequences, were born into wealth and spent all their time engaging in perversion. They wrecked the economy to steal more money from the public, just as is happening today in America.
Guess who put a stop to both the perversion AND the inflation?
Guess who put a stop to both the perversion AND the inflation?
Amongst others, an open fag.
Homosexuality itself is not a problem. Decadent and foolish behavior is.
So gay cheetahs were never the problem after all?
No. Furgays and zoophiles are.
How does it affect your life when somebody shags his horse?
I feel bad for the horse and it makes me sick. That's how it effects me, and the only reasons I need to dislike it. Now, inb4 you spin this autistic moral relativism bullshit, know that I, and the public at large just don't care for excuses. Even left leaning people, and people who support LGBTQ shit think it's nasty.
So you admit that your only argument against it is muh feelings? Would you like to speak with my manager?
>So you admit that your only argument against it is muh feelings?
Yes. It's hardwired into normal people, so it's true.
Define "normal people" and explain why you yourself are normal and not defective.
>Define le normal person
Not you.
Not very hardwired if they can’t stomach a witch hunt and the only barrier to cross for normal is a degree of introspection and the ability to question what you’ve been told not to think about. It’s JUST…
But you don’t have a soul. You can’t have personal morals. You need to be controlled by others and can’t comprehend that people can operate independently without being as horrible as you know you’d be.
>Le free thinker here
My individual morals tell me I dog fucking is gross.
That’s nice but if you had a gun in your face, would you fish your own out of your pants and risk getting shot for it?
>But you don’t have a soul. You can’t have personal morals. You need to be controlled by others and can’t comprehend that people can operate independently without being as horrible as you know you’d be.
It's a Karen, anon. The only scary thing is that she has voting rights. But don't worry, the elections are manipulated so it doesn't matter anyway.
>most people want you in prison and no "moral" or rational argument will change that.
Until most people don't want me in prison, then it'll all "miraculously" change against all these "impossible" odds 😉
How do NPCs discover this site anyway? Your mainstream news rags told you that this place is full of hackers and racists.
>Until most people don't want me in prison
you've had 6000 years to change opinions
>they know i fucked a horse
that's gotta be an interesting story at christmas
look, it happens pretty often with horny teens on ranches. But when you make your entire life about fucking horses we're going to start to hate you.
>you've had 6000 years to change opinions
Gays achieved victory after 6000 years, who says we won't?
>who says we won't?
you might
but you're going to have to increase your numbers by some 1000X and then convince all those animal fuckers to brag about it and dare their families to hate them
and frankly not that many people fuck animals
Frankly it doesn’t concern anyone
1: you won’t do shit and never will
2: if no one is abusive not even vets can tell (yes huskies are too small and sex out of heat is rape)
>Frankly it doesn’t concern anyone
except you
what you think is your entire life and personality is something society will casually toss you in prison for and never think about again.
It’s not my entire life and personality, and anyone who cares to try hasn’t yet. People on the internet are always mad, but they don’t do anything.
The elites are using dogs to fulfill the maternal instinct so women are never motivated to go off birth control. They need your recreational sex to be with people so you can be forced and conditioned to hold the Right Opinions to have as much pointless sex as possible.
>People on the internet are always mad, but they don’t do anything.
literally nothing we could do, that's why you post here.
you don't have the guts to post and face the consequences
>come out and be proud
Why make a point of offending random NPCs by showing off how their programming isn’t necessarily right? That would just make them angry and damage society. Only a garden gnome would encourage mutual destruction like that. They love disorder.
>The elites are using dogs to fulfill the maternal instinct so women are never motivated to go off birth control. They need your recreational sex to be with people so you can be forced and conditioned to hold the Right Opinions to have as much pointless sex as possible.
Exactly.
>sex out of heat is rape
that's wildly inaccurate. when in heat some dogs are so engorged that only a pencil dick dog can get in.
they enjoy it out of heat too, especially for a few months after heat when their hormones level is still wild (and in my experience, continuous stimulation will change something in them cause my dogs become sexually frustrated all the time)
>look, it happens pretty often with horny teens on ranches. But when you make your entire life about fucking horses we're going to start to hate you.
>"I-it's only bad if you liked it!"
>but you're going to have to increase your numbers by some 1000X and then convince all those animal fuckers to brag about it and dare their families to hate them
No we don't. Trannies are far less numerous than zoos and the media can't shut up about them. But they got astroturfed anyway because there's a lot of money to make out of a chud. There's no money in zoos.
>and frankly not that many people fuck animals
"Not that many" isn't a number.
>"I-it's only bad if you liked it!"
nobody wants their kid to go to prison
unless they insist on doing the same stupid stuff over and over
>Trannies are far less numerous than zoos and the media can't shut up about them.
yeah you only get FOX NEWS in WY
back in the real world nobody differentiates trannies from gays of any sort so their numbers are absolutely enormous compared to you.
>nobody wants their kid to go to prison
What part of "legal in Wyoming" are you failing to understand?
>muh Fox news
Fox news toots the same horn, only with a different rhetoric.
>back in the real world nobody differentiates trannies from gays of any sort so their numbers are absolutely enormous compared to you.
Now you're just making shit up.
>What part of "legal in Wyoming" are you failing to understand?
I've lived in wyoming and I guaranfuckingtee you "not illegal" is not the same as "legal."
>Now you're just making shit up.
Wauf has rotted your brain
trannies are just one type of gay. Not a big fraction, just a tiny part of a relatively huge gay contingent.
just like horse fuckers from wyoming is only 17 people while animal fuckers from wyoming is probably 89% of the male population.
>I've lived in wyoming and I guaranfuckingtee you "not illegal" is not the same as "legal."
So will you get prosecuted for it or not?
>trannies are just one type of gay. Not a big fraction, just a tiny part of a relatively huge gay contingent.
That has nothing to do with what you've said.
>just like horse fuckers from wyoming is only 17 people while animal fuckers from wyoming is probably 89% of the male population.
Sooo if 89% of the male population of WY have shagged a horse, why would they have a problem with somebody else shagging a horse?
>So will you get prosecuted for it or not?
it's possible
>Sooo if 89% of the male population of WY have shagged a horse
learn to read gay
are you drunk or just stupid?
>it's possible
That doesn't clarify much
>animal fuckers from wyoming is probably 89% of the male population
So what's your other implication here if not that? That WY locals fuck non-horse animals? My argument stays the same.
>That WY locals fuck non-horse animals?
there's 30 women in WY and they have 27 teeth between them. Probably all air force hoes also
so you fuck animals in a country that has no women. Whatever, that's pretty normal.
You don't want other animal fuckers to go to prison because that means you'd have to condemn your own animal fucking
also normal.
I think if you're from WY you get a pass on fucking animals. You don't have any choice there. Your sister is faster than you.
your alternative is literally prison.
>so you fuck animals in a country that has no women. Whatever, that's pretty normal.
>pretty normal
By the looks of it, most people ITT would disagree
>You don't want other animal fuckers to go to prison because that means you'd have to condemn your own animal fucking
So your actual problem with animal fucking is that some people prefer it to fucking women?
>So your actual problem with animal fucking is that some people prefer it to fucking women?
I never said I had a problem with animal fucking
I said you'll go to prison because most people in the US hate it.
except you. You're fine. Fucking animals in Wyoming is normal.
>I said you'll go to prison because most people in the US hate it.
>except you. You're fine. Fucking animals in Wyoming is normal.
So you... don't go to prison for it in Wyoming. 3 posts later, you repeat what you've originally dismissed.
>So you... don't go to prison for it in Wyoming
you might
but I doubt it because who hasn't fucked an animal in wyoming?
if nothing else we can't seat a jury of 12 of your peers that haven't fucked sheep.
So what's the point of a legislature that's impossible to enforce because then the whole country would be guilty.
a change of venue and you get prison
There are some pretty hot women in
Wyoming but the bisonussy is just better and doesn’t seek child support or alimony
>There are some pretty hot women in
>Wyoming
kek
this is called demo-mode. after 3 years all humans behave the same way, no matter what gender is it. dogs do not. leave your baits in another place because our sexual prefs cannot be changed, even if you give us britney spears we will still choose a blue-eyed husky, with no irony.
I have a mare, and only a mare. They just know.
What matters is fucking a few women. Exclusive deviants are immature. Orientations other than straight are fetishes and all fags and zoos have felt attracted to women. But fags spread aids, and mares are damn clean, and men tell other people you’re a fag, and a horse tells no one anything but that she likes you very much. A fag uses and abuses other people and destroys their anus, a mare is a natural option and either enjoys it, or destroys your rib cage. You can give up mares and have a family, but your flings will always haunt you. The STDs and bastard children especially.
>K-karen!
Very strange dogfucker cope.
>Very strange
A.k.a. "I don't have a stock response to dismiss it with"
What's there to dismiss? It's a silly insult. "Oh no, they're emotional about not liking dog fucking!" Ok...?
Why would you feel bad for a horse that only felt good?
>not one of them will die
They’ve never tried. It seems they would, or else there would have been a violent purge by now. It’s a pretty low priority moral rooted in religious dogma and that furbaby bullshit more than anything more valid. People know it really isn’t a big deal.
I feel bad for women and it makes me sick. Women do not consent to sex with men. They are preyed upon and the power imbalance makes them submit.
Ban human male/human female pairings! Tiger and wolf females for human males only, in the name of morality!
The women can be lesbos and get their kids from sperm banks.
You want me to go "that's not true, women can consent" so you can say "so do animals." my response is fucking animals is repulsive.
>my response is fucking animals is repulsive.
Nobody asked you to look.
Nobody said it was good or ok fuck animals.
I did.
And I said it wasn't.
My response is that you're repulsive.
More intelligent people whose opinions are more valuable would disagree, especially off the record and away from your histrionic shrieking.
>More intelligent people whose opinions are more valuable would disagree
"They're smarter because their opinions on animal fucking conform with mine"
No, you're repulsive. And probably fat.
>away from your histrionic shrieking
You're the expert on histrionic shrieking, Karen.
So it's set up only to give prison to the ones that people have a beef with.
>So it's set up only to give prison to the ones that people have a beef with.
yes
are you stupid?
fuck a sheep, get your case transfered to boulder county, go to prison for life.
So your system is openly corrupt and you're doing nothing about it.
If you suddenly have a problem with feeling based arguments, then why do you keep using them?
>So your system is openly corrupt and you're doing nothing about it.
atheist
amoral
you call it corrupt but you have no basis for that except you don't like it. Boo hoo. Get more people on your side or die
I don't care which.
You’re already on our side in wyoming kek
>You’re already on our side in wyoming kek
it's like NZ, we all have one place where we joke about people fucking sheep or their sister or whatever and if you fuck sheep or your sister or whatever I'm not going to lock you up because it's funny to me when someone from Arkansas fucks his sister or someone from Wyoming fucks a herd of sheep.
that's the joke, right? It's stupid, but you're a living caricature.
And the fag from south wyoming is a retarded liberal moral relativist, of course
moral relativist implies morals are real things
morals don't exist
I'm just a natural human telling you without judgment that most of the US will gladly lock you in prison and let all different sorts of men insert their penises into your anus
>I'm just a natural human telling you without judgment that most of the US will gladly lock you in prison and let all different sorts of men insert their penises into your anus
Who gives a shit about "most of the US"
"Most of the US" took the clotshot and will hopefully be dead within a few years
>Who gives a shit about "most of the US"
change of venue and you will
>"Most of the US" took the clotshot and will hopefully be dead within a few years
keep hoping I guess
you retards were predicting mass death 2 years ago.
There wasn't even a clotshot yet 2 years ago
close
the shot was announced 5 minutes after trump lost
go figure.
People weren't being jabbed until last year. Most of the risks of concern are illnesses that won't apparent until years have passed. If anybody suggests that there might be a connection and it should be (independently) investigated, they will be deplatformed as a dangerous conspiracy theorist.
>that's the joke, right? It's stupid, but you're a living caricature.
Maybe funny, until you try it yourself and realize that it's no different from your girlfriend except without the money leeching and lying.
I don't live in WY so I don't really care. It's something that should concern -you-. It's basically USSR tier trials. "Tow the line or we'll frame you for what we're all doing"
is not me. And I don't think it's a problem, I just think it's funny that I was able to whittle away the bullshit moral facade to a matter that was always "animals make my peepee hard."
And if you fuck them morally it is moral to fuck them. Amoral atheists are the only bad people here. A golden retriever has more willpower than you, pawn.
>pawn
>it's a globalist scheme to not fuck animals!!
that's you. And just so you know, it's always immoral to fuck animals.
So you're just butting in to an ongoing discourse to call somebody a hypocrite without context. Gotcha.
No, you were talking to me and someone else butted into our conversation. His comment wasn't bad though.
I wasn't talking to you fag.
>Dogfuckerbros, we've lost the plot!
>schizo poster talks to himself
>tries bad revisionism so he can win
Samefag
Yes. that is me, anon. Very astute.
Feeling-based arguments from the enlightened morally just dogfucker?! Woah!
Women are more repulsive. They’re only good for having children.
Clarifying that an obscure, purged fucker was "amount others" isn't the checkmate you think it is.
>obscure, purged fucker
Actually one of their most prominent figureheads.
Most prominent purged figureheads.
>literally backstab your party colleague because of internal power struggles
>"see they stabbed him cuz he's a fag"
Literally fell for propaganda tier.
Why did they put up with his gayry for so long then? They literally built a campaign with his man loving shoulders.
People are trusting retards. Even today, people will fight tooth and nail to defend literal chud loving gays who say "based and epic" things like Nick Fuentes because they can't stand the though of their e-daddys being comprised.
>Even today, people will fight tooth and nail to defend literal chud loving gays
But that's what the popular opinion wants, ergo in your zogbot universe it's the moral thing to do!
Not the healthy people. The retards who don't recoil from it or defend it have something wrong with them.
Moving the goalposts again. Popular opinion doesn't care whether the majority is healthy or retarded. This is the hill you chose to die on.
The goalpost was already moved when you tried to equate a minority of freaks who can't see something really bad as really bad and move on with the majority who can.
>a minority of freaks who can't see something really bad as really bad
That's funny because that minority of freaks right now dictates your legislature, your public opinion and your (NPC idea of) morals.
They defend Nick Fuentes?
Nick Fuentes isn't mainstream by any stretch. Controlled opposition maybe.
first of all, stop using bad or good words or you automatically is moralgay and your opinion and post skips. use false or true words.
the main reason is that moralgays think we love dogs because we have solved "yep i am gonna love dogs though i hetero". its wrong. you cant make a person to love dogs.
for me, loving dogs and other animals started since childhood. in kindergarten i loved dogs and avoided girls who tried to chat with me. it is not our choice, it was given for us since birth. some patters inside our brain perceive animals more attractive than other people. if i am wrong, fix my opinion.
based animal lover. NPCs think it's a choice to prefer animals and they think we do it because we desperate and can't find a humanoid... but i have no attraction towards them so i'm not even trying.
>NPCs think it's a choice
I don't necessarily think it's a choice
I just think there's so few of you that you don't matter. Normal people pass laws against you and you can't do anything about it because you're essentially nobody.
also Wauf would love to get rid of you so they can make money.
>you can't do anything about it because you're essentially nobody.
we don't really care. anyone who has two braincells will likely never get caught. the ones that get caught are always the abusive or retarded ones so it's good that they get locked away.
>also Wauf would love to get rid of you so they can make money.
you're delusional if you think Wauf will make a bank by banning us. most advertisers already know Wauf is a vile place, banning us won't get rid of that stigma.
>stop saying its bad, it hurts my feelings! say it's true or you're moralfagging!
It's bad and you have a mental problem.
Samefag
The Samefagging copout only works if its a reply to the same post.
Aggressively deviant deviants, mind you. These were not bifags butt fucking in secret or the closed bedroom affairs of otherwise normal and productive people. garden gnomes, literally, were promoting it as public spectacle and lifestyle that was to be part of everyone’s life. There were businesses in berlin where men would pass around a swan and rape it until it died. The sheer hideousness of ot was part of how hitler got people on board with garden gnome hate.
And it continues today. It’s not for freedom, it’s for maximum obscenity. It’s abrahamic accelerationism to bring about revelations.
What all these smug bitchy twitter libs keep forgetting is what comes after Weimar.
You sick queers should be more worried about how it will affect your lives. Roe's gone, gay marriage is next, then homosex.
>You sick queers should be more worried about how it will affect your lives. Roe's gone, gay marriage is next, then homosex.
I-it was just about protecting kids I swear!
I don't live in your failed empire so I sleep.
Typing like you do, you definitely live in the west and you're fucking delusional if you think you're not affected.
No.
>and you're fucking delusional if you think you're not affected.
I'm literally not affected
lol
K you keep thinking that.
>No.
i’m right. if it does no harm then there should be no observable long term effects. it isn’t socially appropriate so no one should ever find out anyways.
this also applies to gays.
Rape is harm.
Actual rape is harm. Statutory rape? It’s only theoretically maybe harmful to humans because maturation does weird shit to memories of past sex, especially for women. For an animal i don’t think they really care. The only thing harmed is your dignity, if you even subscribe to the normoid dogma. Animal abuse is already illegal. Is bestiality can’t be prosecuted as animal abuse and everyone involved is happy and healthy, then it’s not worth the cops time.
>Is bestiality can’t be prosecuted as animal abuse
You gays don't understand.
it's not prosecuted as animal abuse because nobody cares about the animal. It's prosecuted as a sexual crime because we don't want you around.
Who's "we"?
The vast majority of humanity with any kind of empathy and self respect.
99.9% of voting adults
the ones that agree to lock you up.
Leading experts agree that bestiality is fine when practiced correctly and wealthy, intelligent, and respectable white people agree. Only poor minorities have an irrational hatred for it.
See, anyone can pull your weak shit. They’re using your “argument” to push gay supremacy and you’re losing that lne. You are the other side of a culture war but you’re still a soldier in an unwinnable quagmire. 2000 years of christianity, 4000 years of the torah before that, you have accomplished nothing, nothing at all, you seek to keep mens souls tender as eventual blood sacrifices to a lying fire demon but you never change the world. The fight against humanity on all sides pleases the gods. Mastery of it, mitigation of its flaws, control, and slow and voluntary extinction of vice (if it even is vice) is too simple of a solution and doesn’t give the common retard a feeling of purpose and supremacy.
if you were right it would be legal.
it's not. You have to hide your shit. Pretty much every perversion in the world is allowed now but you're still up there with kiddie fuckers when it comes to being hated.
>if you were right it would be legal.
Homosexuality is legal, is it right?
>Homosexuality is legal, is it right?
learn to read ESL gay
Because “they” chose animals as child replacements, not casual sex partners. Learn to into social engineering. Your sex partners need to be human because sex controls people. Who you can have sex with dictates how you live your life. Even celibates can be controlled with sex. If people have sex outside of the social dogma, sex can not control them. Sex is an important tool in making sure everyone believes the right things, or else they don’t get laid, so sex with politically cognizant beings must be promoted and happen as often as possible.
Animals were chosen to just replace kids so people would have endless sex with strangers without forming families.
I don’t care what people have been told to think. I care about what’s actually right. And I know we’d have a better society if every gay fucked a horse instead of another man. You know they might actually get bored and go for women that way.
morality has nothing to do with sex
nor does politics or reason
beast sex is illegal because 99.9% of US voters find it repulsive. No other explanation needed.
What people have been told to think is irrelevant as it has ever been. Have fun with that when the majority is extremely anti-racist and pro-lgbt to the point that children are instructed to try being gay/trans and always date outside their race. Won’t be epix justice when the dogma doesn’t come from your book will it?
>What people have been told to think is irrelevant as it has ever been
true.
you can't get 99.9% of US voters to agree on ANYTHING no matter what you tell them
but we agree you should be locked up.
Nothing to do with religion. Man (in the west) has agreed it is abominable and anyone found doing so to be heavily reprimanded. You wish to live outside those laws, fine. Do not bitch when the outlaw becomes hunted.
Man has been told it was. Man once said stars were holes in a giant dome because his leaders supposed that explanation supported the faith that kept them in power the best. What man thinks is not always right or untainted by others plans.
Who cares? When the zoos stand up to fight i’ll be behind them, braining you guys from 500 yards out. I’d rather have them around than puritans. Your eternal conquest of human nature in the name of a false god has been consistently as bad as the aggressive gnomish sexual degenerates.
>When the zoos stand up to fight i’ll be behind them, braining you guys from 500 yards out.
good luck with that.
they'll never stand up to fight because it would be one against a million.
If it’s rape i hope you’re an anti-pet vegan because pet ownership has resulted in more physical and emotional damage to animals than any other relationship. It is still standard practice to train dogs by causing them extreme pain and throat/neck injuries. They don’t consent to pointless neutering procedures either and they definitely aren’t for their own good.
Morals are not real. Normies are egoists at their core.
The typical human-dog relationship formed the basis for how circuses abused animals into performing. Modern highly obedient breeds are what was left when the dogs that didn’t obey on the first command were shoveldog.gif’d.
I have always been in favor of strict licensing to own any animal with harsh penalties for transgressors.
I care about the animal AND am sickened by sex pests.
Wauf - bestiality and transgenderism
>Wauf - bestiality and transgenderism
yeah it's disappointing
here's what I've been doing
every time I see a company advertise here I take a screenshot of their ad next to a dogfucker post and I email it to them.
Good work.
we need a report classification that specifically targets zoo content.
Until we get that I don't really know what to do except trash the site's ad revenue.
mods need to get on this. I'd rather not cost Wauf money but fuck these dog fucking scum
Jannies don't care. They're all sex pests and want bestiality to take over the board, just as they want pedophilia to take over others.
the advertisers who choose to advertise on blue boards know what they're getting into. you being a pathetic karen won't hurt anyone's revenue. especially considering that it's almost always text and not bestiality content
>the advertisers who choose to advertise on blue boards know what they're getting into
apparently not
I've seen 3 go away permanently in the last 2 days.
Hiroshimoot knows. You fags are stealing money out of his pocket. He'll figure out a way to destroy you.
We all block ads anyways
Anyways have you considered a dolphin?
>Anyways have you considered a dolphin?
I have dozens of women after my cock.
no time for animals or men.
sorry.
>i have dozens of STDs and child support cases after my wallet
>I have dozens of women after my cock.
And not a single one worth staying with.
maybe cause it's a new quarter and it's likely that they didn't see any revenue from Wauf so they pulled the plug on those ads
>they didn't see any revenue from Wauf
1 day isn't enough to measure
it is. and there are a lot of retards buying Wauf passes so dw, Wauf will survive.
storage isn't expensive anymore, Wauf isn't fb so it doesn't need a lot of compute power... so with a decent initial investment for the hardware, you could run a Wauf like service for less than $1k by colocating your servers
obviously true.
but just because Wauf doesn't need to make a profit doesn't mean the owner doesn't want it to.
>People weren't being jabbed until last year
you underestimate how many trump supporters are over 40
Who gives a shit about Trump supporters? Either you're jabbed or not. Any other bipartisanship right now is artificial D&C bullshittery.
>Either you're jabbed or not.
all righties over 40 are jabbed and have been for years.
so you say the jab is new, you're ignoring 80^+ of the people on your side. And when you ignore them either you or they go away.
in your case it's you that doesn't matter.
i assume that the reason is not ^80 of moralgays. if you see closely you can see that every country has rednecks and plebs. it is symptome. the reason, in my opinion, is christian moral which has to be in garbage. it dictates the whole Earth, and PETA and such cases is also a symptome of it. "we can do anything we want with exotic animals and you may not because you do not have abstract paper license".
the reason doesn't matter
only the outcome
and the outcome is you go to prison.
>you're ignoring 80^+ of the people on your side
What's my side?
>What's my side?
literal schizophrenic paranoia and antisocial tendencies.
And what's my opposition?
>And what's my opposition?
literally everyone that's on your side but doesn't meet your purity test
in this case anyone over the age of 40 or having a pre-existing condition making them vulnerable to covid
which just happens to be almost everyone that agrees with you politically.
I don't think we understand each other. Please strawman me some more. What is my side? What are my politics?
>What is my side? What are my politics?
you're a rightie that fears the jab while almost all righties took the jab
you're a minority, a loser.
>anyone who has two braincells will likely never get caught.
says the guy posting in public about his crimes on a website that literally only exists to trap criminals
>you're delusional if you think Wauf will make a bank by banning us
it's never been tried, but if it was my site you'd be gone so fast your head would spin.
>rightie
Wrong
>fears the jab
Rightfully so, I work in healthcare
>Rightfully so, I work in healthcare
no you don't.
I work in healthcare and we fired anyone that refused the shots.
>I work in healthcare and we fired anyone that refused the shots.
And then whined that you're overloaded and lack personnel to care for the unjabbed.
>Wrong
Libertarian?
Why are you guessing, I thought you knew me well enough to judge me already?
I'm not the other guy. Why do dogfuckers have a hard time pinning down who's talking to them in this thread?
Why do you assume you're replying to a dogfucker?
You are.
You're the dogfucker.
So you're a libertarian, or...?
Am I the cowboy, or am I the indian?
Categorical tribalism is for normie slime.
Libertarian it is then. Very fitting.
What is a libertarian?
they categorize books according to the dewey decimal system
I'm pretty bad with organizing my personal stuff though.
Doesn't sound like me then.
Why isn't everybody libertarian?
Eh, you're pretty amoral when it comes to animal sex though.
Why do you assume that?
Haven't you been defending fucking animals this whole thread?
Why do you assume that's amoral? If animal fuckers are unjustly persecuted, then it would actually be the most moral thing to do.
>dodged the question
I'm right, you are.
That wasn't a yes.
It's as close to a yes that i'm getting from a gay who likes to weasel around out of a simple question.
If I'd say no, would that be moral?
that'd just be more weaselwork, wouldn't it?
So should I just post yes to please your preconception of who I am?
My perception is that you're a big advocate or defender of it, which is basically just like saying you're one without saying you're one.
>My perception is that you're a big advocate or defender of it,
Perhaps I question the mainstream narrative on zoophilia which I see as driven by politics rather than reason.
>which is basically just like saying you're one without saying you're one.
Wrong, because defending zoophilia is perfectly legal.
>driven by politics rather than reason.
It's reasonable to not fuck animals, that's one thing I and most of the fags in power agree on
>defending zoophilia is perfectly legal.
I don't care
>It's reasonable to not fuck animals
And what's the reasoning?
>I don't care
I could already gather that you don't care what you're posting.
A Lawless morally justified, amoral gay to the "right".
Tell me why you're not one.
>says the guy posting in public about his crimes on a website that literally only exists to trap criminals
it's legal where i live and i never posted anything incriminating. if it would be illegal and authorities would investigate me based on some shitposting, a lawyer would easily dismiss it.
>but if it was my site you'd be gone so fast your head would spin.
good thing it's not your site then, snowflake. and in the end, i don't think any of us would care if we get banned. if we wanna have sane convos, we have zv. i only come here to shitpost, make idiots like u seethe and sometimes find cute DWs
>it's legal where i live
>this post violates US law
>if we wanna have sane convos, we have zv.
another honey pot
Talking about horse pussy is illegal in US now?
I don't think so.
I'm just saying the law that matters here isn't yours.
You can't prosecute me under US law for something that's legal in my country.
>this post violates US law
isn't legislature and basically means nothing.
>You can't prosecute me under US law for something that's legal in my country
no, we only ban you and stop you from talking here
>how is it a crime if it's legal here?
you're not discussing it there
you're posting in the US.
>no, we only ban you and stop you from talking here
banning in 2022 does shit. residential proxies and mobile data plans are dirt cheap.
>you're not discussing it there
>you're posting in the US.
That does not fucking make it illegal retard.
>That does not fucking make it illegal retard.
>this post violates US law
Hoooly fuck my dude, the US law is not a worldwide law. Me violating the laws of your shithole doesn't mean I did something illegal as long as it's legal in the country where I'm residing and a citizenship.
>no, we only ban you and stop you from talking here
Oh no I need to change my IP
>you're posting in the US.
Oh no you're gonna send FBI halfway through the world to knock on my door for saying "horse fucking"
I can even say "moron", now that'll land me 20 years of prison I'm sure
>I can even say "moron", now that'll land me 20 years of prison I'm sure
ironically enough racist speech is protected in the US while you would go to prison for your animal fucking.
>while you would go to prison for your animal fucking
Which animal fucking? Either provide evidence or I can counter-sue you for defamation.
>I can counter-sue you for defamation.
you can't because that would require proving me wrong.
Wrong about what? You think I can't pretend to be a disgusting normalgay for a single trial? That's like the easiest thing ever.
>You think I can't pretend to be a disgusting normalgay for a single trial?
that's not how US law works
if you're going to post under US law you should learn about it.
you would be in prison here
if you sued me you'd be in prison much faster
sue someone for calling you a dog fucker and see what happens I guess.
>Yes your honesty this person falsely prosecuted me, alleging me of being a dogfucker and was proven wrong, and he tainted my good name in the process, I demand reparations
>???
>subpoenas your internet history
>you fuck dogs
>I win all $3.25 of your assets
>I also get to kill your dog
>you fuck dogs
"I troll people by pretending to fuck dogs"
>no evidence of me fucking dogs
Case closed, not guilty
>I also get to kill your dog
You wish, and then you'd pat yourself on the back about caring for animals I'm sure.
>no evidence of me fucking dogs
unless you own a dog and came on here saying you fucked it
juries in my country don't know about "trolling" and wouldn't care if they did.
>unless you own a dog and came on here saying you fucked it
I didn't say which dog, and you can't prove I actually did it. As a matter of fact, I've never actually fucked a dog.
Your move, gay
>I didn't say which dog, and you can't prove I actually did it
luckily in the US a jury decides, and we don't require absolute proof.
>The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
>Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Jury, read.
>Jury, read.
jury don't care
>I was only PRETENDING to confess to a crime
kek
>jury don't care
jury does fucking care. are you sure you aren't just a 14y old kid who's pretending to know what they talking about based on some 4/10 star crime show you found on netflix?
try me
I haven't bought an ad here in a few years so maybe you're right. but last time I bought ad space on Wauf the didn't have any of that.
>post your dad's letter of appreciation
>post your dad's letter of appreciation
my dad is dead.
nobody in the US wants to serve jury duty.
nobody that serves jury duty is under the age of 40
and nobody that serves jury duty fucks dogs
so you've got an automatic loss from day one.
>my dad is dead.
That can't beright, I fucked him in the ass last week
ew
I'm not even sure he has an ass by now
>luckily in the US a jury decides
you watched too many crime shows, the US jury can be understanding, they're not psychos who want to jail everyone.
zero paperwork from vets and zero recordings of me doing anything and your case will be a waste of the jury's and my lawyers time.
>juries hate it when you waste their time
you're just making this up now
I don't even have a hard drive. and no, incognito browsing data in a sane browser (not chrome) is not stored on disk.
>I've advertised here
oh suuure u did
>you watched too many crime shows,
I've served on a lot of juries
we don't like being called in to judge you
My dad works at the nintendo jury and says you're full of shit.
you're getting boring at this point. I wish this board would allocate people IDs so I can autohide your childish bullshit.
>juries in my country don't know about "trolling" and wouldn't care if they did.
that's why you get a smart lawyer to represent you so they can explain to the jury what "trolling" is.
that's also a fucking lie, the juries can be young people. it's enough to have one young jury which can explain it to the others during deliberation and your mastermind plan is fucked.
>and your history isn't on the internet, dumbass.
then where is it? in my incognito tabs? stored at ISP level? oh wait, my ISP can't see shit because it's all encrypted, even at the DNS level so they can't even check that I asked the server for "doggycookies.com"
>so they can explain to the jury what "trolling" is.
juries hate it when you waste their time
we'll convict you just for that
>the juries can be young people
kek
young people in the US don't go to jury duty
>then where is it? i
your hard drive moron
your internet history
you think there's a big database of everything you do on the internet that you can subpoena?
with something as basic as encrypted DNS and 6to4, your traffic already becomes almost impossible to monitor. slap a residential proxy on top of that, and you have zero chances of finding out the shit I do on the internet.
real world isn't your fantasy police show, FBI won't raid me mid wank to catch me looking at a cookie.
>you think there's a big database of everything you do on the internet that you can subpoena?
I only need one post
and your history isn't on the internet, dumbass.
>if you're going to post under US law you should learn about it.
how dense do you have to be to be this dumb?
Did you get dropped on your head as a child?
You were saying that I'm talking about "my crimes", but how is it a crime if it's legal here? Why would I care about the US law in this case? The US laws won't be the one prosecuting me considering your shitty laws don't apply worldwide.
If I murder someone in a hypothetical country where it's legal to do so, you can't just come to me and arrest me because "Actually, it's illegal in my shithole, so you're going to jail based on my laws"
you didn't have to repost, I don't really read what you write anyways.
you fuck animals, why would I care what you say? in my country you'd be in prison getting brutally fucked in your ass and nobody would care.
>you didn't have to repost
I did, because when retards like you run out of arguments, you will attack my incorrect use of a term.
"he said incriminating instead of prosecuting, SEE HE IS DUMB AND HIS ARGUMENTS ARE INVALID" -- every Blackid like you
>you will attack my incorrect use of a term.
I didn't read your post and I probably never will
I don't see you as human. You're like if a husky went online and tried to argue with me. I'd toss you a treat and take you to the vet to be put down.
nothing personal, you just don't count.
aren't you the incel shitposting in every /dog/ and having weird murder fantasies?
>aren't you the incel shitposting in every /dog/ and having weird murder fantasies?
no I don't think so
I do fantasize about killing dog fuckers, but I think that's pretty normal in the US.
>says the guy posting in public about his crimes on a website that literally only exists to trap criminals
I was only joking haha horse pussy hehe
Yeah try to trap me gay
>it's never been tried, but if it was my site you'd be gone so fast your head would spin.
You couldn't make a site if your life depended on it
Advertisers pulled the plug because of 4chanshitters, not what's happening on Wauf.
I saw ads on Wauf for almost 5 minutes today
so I screenshotted you fucks right below the ad and sent it to the advertiser.
then the ads went away
That's cause ads are randomized and some of them have a limited reach. Learn how the fuck advertising works retard.
There is ZERO chance that they pulled the plug on an ad so fast cause of a karen.
>Learn how the fuck advertising works retard.
I've advertised here
ads have a numerical placement, but not a temporal one.
if I see the same ad on 3 refreshes and it goes away that's because it got pulled.
>if I see the same ad on 3 refreshes and it goes away that's because it got pulled.
Incorrect, even bid.glass had a setting for how many times you want your ad to be seen by an IP address before it changed to a different ad.
If a zoophile really doesnt do anything wrong then their activities should be undetectable, and they only benefit from it being illegal since most people cant even refrain from being abusive to animals without sexual motivations. Walk down the road - how many people yank their dog around by the leash for wanting to stop and sniff something?
Genuinely well put, anon.
Social reasons
Humans do it to reduce male competition while maximizing male societal contributions. This is why subsequent sons are increasingly homo and why the gods put the prostate there.
Because males show off their highest grade of friendship, it is easier for them (no need to spread stench for picrel), and sometimes it leads to extinction, like on picrel, too!
Because sex feels good.