why are norwegians so terrible to animals? they are almost like asians

why are norwegians so terrible to animals? they are almost like asians

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Based Nords. I heard they hunt whales/porpoises and also club seals

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Atheist nations are ok doing morally wrong stuff.
    Just look at Canada openly telling their seniors to kill themselves lmao.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      a christian nation would have killed it immediately, made it into stew, and fed the poor while saying "see? we have food, so keep having as many kids as you possibly can."

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        are these christians in the room with you now?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          not for another 4 days no

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    99% of intelligence testing relies on motivation. humans only complete IQ tests because they believe they will receive social status in return. if offered mediocre food and not told about the purpose of completing the test they would be prone to fricking off when the test got difficult but an alien would sumrise that they were stupid because life should naturally want to eat. so they would starve the humans, and they would do even more poorly as a result, to the point some would give up after a few questions believing their situation was hopeless, not knowing why they were being starved and making up theories about just being tortured for fun and made to solve puzzles that will result in the destruction of earth. some humans would by chance, infer that it is an intelligence test, and believe they were proving their species. other humans would debate that this is an unprovable and naive belief, and they should refuse to participate. aliens, hearing nothing but monkey noises, would determine humans were extremely unintelligent, and only built civilization based on instinct.

    we have seen dogs fail to use mirrors in labs. then a dog in its own home uses a mirror... only when told it should. we can not estimate animal intelligence without the ability to fully simulate their brain and indirectly experience their thought process to see what's really going on. just algorithms or complex consciousness?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It relies on our belief that animals are so stupid they don't place bullshit abstractions in the path of reason and will always do what we think an animal should: pursue pleasure as well as it can. But if they do have some thought, especially for higher order ones like cats and dogs, it's all bunk.

      People even think a smart dog obeys because they're going to maybe give it food and dogs MUST love food. "If the dog was smart it would obey whether or not I was holding the treat because the payoff is greater than the half second it takes that homosexual to sit" they say thinking the dog has no other motivations in line. Yet man disobeys even when there's a chance he might get a dollar because he thinks obeying would lessen his value as a person. And the dog, an adult, wonders why you are barking at it like a pup.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >walrus sleeps in area with huge crowds of people, piers and boats
    >walrus sleep is disturbed by huge crowds of people that usually hang around that spot because their boats and shit are parked there
    >instead of moving the city a million miles away they kill the animal

    this was just stupid from the begining to the end, just let the animal sleep were it was sleeping the whole time, it didn't hurt anyone, also it was a female, they are not as agressive as males

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You probably eat meat. People generally don't care about animals. Why should wildlife be any different?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Animals raised by us for a purpose ≠ animals trying to survive in the wild.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        npc logic

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You realize people eat wild animals too right?

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Asian terrible would be forcing Freya through abuse to do tricks for paying tourists, then eating her alive and filming it for social media, and then selling her ground-up bone powder as ancient Chinese medicine for erectile dysfunction.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the socialist cuckold cries our “somebody besides me do something!”

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    just wtf did you expect out of snowBlack folk
    they hunt whales

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I went to disnney before this happened.and the.greeter guy told us
      >if you see.a gator it is NOT animatronic

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >if you see.a gator it is NOT animatronic
        >laugh at joke
        >get eaten

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >freakish incident
      it's not really that crazy

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I remember this story
      >Family lets 2 year old wade into Florida lagoon water unattended
      >Kid is grabbed by a gator

      It's funny though, pigeons are notoriously unaffected by these things. I once saw a nest lodged between them with a fat pigeon having a good time.

      It's hard to be mad at pigeons and crows for their persistence to survive and thrive in urban environments despite governments' efforts to get rid of them.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Is this that Call Of The Crocodile I've heard such good things about?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >prestigious development
      >can't afford a fricking carport

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      i feel like it should be your own duty to defend yourself from animals (or hire someone else to do it for you)
      proactively insulating people from wildlife just makes everyone weaker and slightly dumber in the long run. but maybe an actual Waufcast can tell me I'm moronic and sheltered and we do need death squads for the bears.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Revenge hunts are based and what makes humans human. If we don't revenge hunt our predators we are no better than rats. Even wolves will tear up bear and puma cubs and vice versa in an interconnected triangle of mutual hate. Do you know what doesn't fight back before, during, or after the fact? Vermin. It takes, it dies, but it does not define its right to the world. It's just there spreading and being obnoxious to everything else.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Really? because I've always thought of them as one sided waste. It's not like the animal, or other animals can genuinely learn from and understand the act. Its basically just human narcissism.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            And yet we are here not being eaten by cave lions, feared by wolves, feared by cougars, and feared by all but two species of bear, both of which are endangered. If indians were allowed to have guns i suppose tigers would be gone by now too. India has very strict gun laws, one part to prevent a mass insurrection (british attitude), the other part to prevent wholesale tiger extermination.

            They do learn. The ones that don't naturally fear the tall two legs big eyes won't be passing down their genes that much.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >i hayt anymls im vry edgy
              /gif/ tourists deserve lethal injection

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >i worship animals i am very moral *gets eaten by crocodile*
                Any animal that wants to survive will establish and defend territory because other animals will typically want to eat or kill you regardless of your morals and how well you treat them

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Humans have enough intellect and resources to be better than just another animal though. It's funny how we always prop ourselves up as greater, or more civil and virtuous, enlightened even yet if its convenient for us we're perfectly fine degrading ourselves and acting out more savage, impulsive animal behavior.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Are you really better or just a confused religious person who is halfway to believing in some “man is a higher spiritual being and mortal life is a temporary prison” nonsense?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Are you saying that when a kind of human postures themselves as inherently better and more civilized than certain other kinds of humans, they are delusional and hypocritical?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Deflection
                Yawn. Go back to jerking off at monkey torture /gif/ toursit.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              There's no real proof of that. In fact, its the opposite. There's more proof that animals who actually survive negative human encounters will be more wary.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >genuinely learn from and understand the act
            that has never been the intention and is kind of insane to suggest
            they hunt humans, they get exterminated

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          a human should have enough brain to understand hes better than to kill animals who just do what they are doing. staying out of the way of a resting animal who needs to fight again for its food doesnt hurt a human at all. but i guess some so called humans are just to low IQ to understand and handle different situations

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            A human should have a large enough brain to understand that an animal dying is of no consequence to him and the low cost of killing it is less than the cost of allowing one that can prey upon humans continue exist.

            Ask yourself how many grizzly bears you see when you walk around the block. Is the answer 0? You're welcome. Ask yourself about the dogs. Do you see a lot of golden retrievers that won't kill and eat you, rather than wolves and pitbulls? You're welcome. Honestly, we need to do more revenge hunts.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Okay, Mao.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I had pet rats - a lone male whose buddy died so i got 2 juveniles that i thought were male but 1 turned out to be female -
          When i put them together all hell broke loose and the big male bit off the little male's finger

          I separated them in 2 cages and over time they seemed not to care about each other anymore and kept to themselves in the 2 cages so at some point i stacked the cages on top of each other and left the doors open so the other rats could travel between them

          Then one day like a year or more later, when the big rat was pretty old and geriatric, the now grown up little rat with the bit off finger climbed up into the big rat's cage while he was sleeping - AND BIT OFF THE EXACT SAME FINGER - then went back into his cage like nothing happened

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Then one day like a year or more later, when the big rat was pretty old and geriatric, the now grown up little rat with the bit off finger climbed up into the big rat's cage while he was sleeping - AND BIT OFF THE EXACT SAME FINGER - then went back into his cage like nothing happened
            based

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Hasn't it been documented that rats are smart enough to hold grudges? Still based on the little dudes part.

            >Never forgive
            >Never forget

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              rats represent the bare minimum of mammalian intelligence

              everything rats do all mammals do. we just study rats more thoroughly and they don't have additional thought shit making them artificially moronic.
              >with thought: maybe i shouldn't solve this problem. i just don't feel its worth it. maybe someone else can do it for me? what if i'm not allowed to solve this problem? obviously someone wanted it to be hard to get this food so it's probably theirs. hmm. nah. actually i won't do anything. my life sucks. you'll have to pay me to survive, humans.
              >without thought: FOOD BEHIND PROBLEM SOLVE PROBLEM WHERE THIS GO RIGHT THERE YES FOOD FOOD FOOD FOOD NOW I CAN HAVE SEX AND MAKE BABIES

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                actually humans are just fricking moronic and rats are smarter than us

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >rats represent the bare minimum of mammalian intelligence
                they're smarter than pretty much any mammal aside from chimps, whales, and elephants.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Lmao no. It's just a classic case of progressively more abstract thought fricking problem solving intelligence in the ass, because abstract thought is almost always "wrong" by definition. It's based in unreality. This is classical wisdom. The fool is often wiser in practice than the scholar. It's why people in MENSA get mocked as "midwits" by people who dropped out of highschool.
                >yeah well while yer talkin about dat dumb shit... i got a paycheck, a burger, and had 4 kids. you aint so smart. purpuss of life is to do this. its in the bible. homosexual.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                They have ToM, something almost no other mammal group has.

                they're legitimately smarter than almost all other mammals.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                All mammals have theory of mind dipshit. Soientists are just poor at coaxing it out of them.

                Why is it cat and dog owners can provide not just anecdotes, but video of these animals doing things science says they can't? Because science tests abused and demented animals in poor conditions and more complex minds are more sensitive to stress and prone to "shutting down" and not seeing motivation where we think they should. Rats lack the mental process needed to override simply pursuing a food reward while other animals abstract things so heavily they see obstacles where there are none. Including humans. Depressed humans would appear to be braindead if tested like animals.

                If two animals are tested and one clears the test and one ignores it, is one smarter? perhaps neither comprehends the true nature of the test, and one is motivated, and the other is not sure if they should be.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Rats have been observed delaying their own eating to help another rat so they can also eat the food.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Humans have been observed killing other humans to eat the food, and rushing ahead in their eating to make sure other humans do not get the food. Dogs have been observed sharing food.

                is it intelligence or is it an innate emotional preference? Even insects display altruism. Rather than higher thought this shows that some things are animal instinct justified with human thought rather than human thought overriding animal instinct.

                Do not look at the animal and marvel at how human they are. Look at the animal and marvel at how animal you are. The most human thing you can do is override your instincts entirely. A rat just follows them.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Payback, b***h!

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >proactively insulating people from wildlife just makes everyone weaker and slightly dumber in the long run.

        So many wannabe badasses on this board. You'll be begging for the police to come if you encountered a mountain lion in your porch.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          probably true
          but I feel like part of the reason why I'd freak out if I saw a mountain lion is because I never have to interact with them normally.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          not me. i would admire it, or shoot it if it attacked my family or pets.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Once they learn to associate homes with food, it's fricking over.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Aspen
      Eyup

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I remember reading an article about China evacuating a village so some elephants could pass through. Whitoid governments are officially crueler to animals than the Chinese government.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If a bear breaks into a home or hassles a human in any way, it should die. A bear is a super predator, once that fear is gone someone is gonna get ate.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Their habitats are getting smaller with each passing year due to urbanization. It's not the animal's fault to look for food when there's scarcity of land to scavenge. She had cubs so her desperation was even greater that she was forced to look for food in human homes. They didn't deserve death.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    NPC barbarian creatures. less than 1000 years ago scandies were still committing human sacrifice. thank god they were christianized so at least they could attain some level of culture and decency, though sadly they still speak their weird cave language even though they use roman letters.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Walruses are extremely dangerous and aggressive animals. It's like killing a bear that has a habit of visiting campsites and is getting too close to people.

      Thor would be more pleased if we sent your blood to him rather than your words.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Larp

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >NPC
      i dunno, despite having the intelligence to settle down and reach for the stars they thought it was cooler to build their economy on killing everyone else. in the RPG sense they are the player character, and everyone else is an enemy that drops loot.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >tfw to intelligent too not live in a mud hut

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        In the rpg sense you make it sound like they are the bandit faction that is always hostile. The definition of NPC

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You know who else is always hostile and roams around for personal gain? The player. They just don't think they're the same because the story says they're the hero.
          >we have greta, so it's ok. time to raid england again.

          but it's not unique to them. every half decent culture has a history of raiding others. even the english who got raided were just prior raiders that settled down.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Admits to being a greedy barbarian just. Y how he plays his RPGs
            KEK

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >hmm how do we stop people from disturbing this poor animal?
    >let's just murder it lmao
    wtf kind of logic is that

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      But anon, think about all the poor rich people seething over the Walrus loitering on their boats.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Like this I imagine.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's funny though, pigeons are notoriously unaffected by these things. I once saw a nest lodged between them with a fat pigeon having a good time.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Improvise, Adapt, Overcome

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >forget that Rock Doves are native to Iran in the first place & are an invasive pest in North America that can't even survive outside urban environment

        I hate bleeding heart "scientists" so fricking much. The sheer irony of calling anyone idiotic topkek

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Interesting how you zero in on pigeons when said spikes would in theory be an issue for all birds that try to use the tree.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They aren’t rock doves, Black person; they’re feral domestic pigeons.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >that can't even survive outside urban environment
          I saw a little flock in the desert

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          First of all it's the UK you dumb Black person, where Rock Doves are actually native.

          Second, Rock Pigeons as they are nicknamed are feral domestic pigeons bred from Rock Doves and Stock Pigeons.

          Third, Rock Pigeons prefer to stoop in city centers and a fancy development in Bristol often has Wood Pigeons, which is another wild native breed.

          Either way it's a dumb Black person choice and the shitty spike things they add do nothing but frick over all bird wildlife in the UK, who cares if samantha don-blythe gets birdshit on the Tesla her daddy bought her the fact it's not legal to literally slaughter anyone in Bristol for fertilizer is a pain on this nation.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Actually in the UK, where the article is posted, the Wood Pigeon outnumbers the Rock Dove and even the feral domestic Pigeon, it's just less likely to be in the town centres in large flocks.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Would go throw my own shit on any car under such a tree, fricking homosexuals trees are for bids not to park your gaycar under

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          you're just asking for catchads to send the feline army out to exterminate the flying rats

          be glad the birds just have to roost somewhere else. someone with a blowtorch and a teflon pan could slaughter every last one of them with minimal risk to human health.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Cat outside = free target practice

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Shit on tesla
        >One of the manny sensors has a seizure
        >Car blows up
        >Bird dies in the explosion
        You see, it is for their safety

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >people wouldn't frick off and leave her alone
      >walrus becomes pretty used to humans
      >this is a problem because gigantic combat tank of an animal that can turn a human into paste, it would have happened eventually
      >despite this, weirdly easy to kill through stress
      >extremely difficult to tranquilize and transport
      >not native to Oslo, was over 3000 miles away from where she should have been up in the Arctic Circle
      >would likely die in transit even if you did manage to dart the thing and successfully put her under
      >needs constant and very specific care when in captivity, most aquariums just can't deal with these things
      >no way to reliably move her to the Arctic without killing her
      >no place to reliably house her without killing her
      >can't leave her on the docks or she would kill someone, leading to her eventual death anyway
      It's a walrus, not a puppy. It was bad luck for her that she ended up in Oslo, but it ended the only way it could have. At least this way it was quick and didn't also involve others going down with her.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        based realist. we're so comfortable and apart from wild animals these days that nearly everyone has forgot that part of building civilization is keeping dangerous creatures out.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        there was another walrus. a male walrus that was even bigger. he did swim around britain to france and even spain. and after that he turned back to the arctic. he survived just fine for months. people just let him be and nothing happened. homosexual

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >people just let him be and nothing happened.
          Wow, you identified the key difference between that story and OP's and it still didn't occur to you.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        moron

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Walruses are slow on land, if she had killed anyone they would have deserve it.
        >not native
        Animals migrate and environments change. Outside of animals that pose a serious threat to their new environment it's megalomanic to demand species respect the borders you've drawn and stay within confined regions.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Walruses are slow on land
          They're surprisingly fast, actually, just not over long distances. Their charges can catch you by surprise.
          >Animals migrate and environments change.
          One individual does not equate to making it a regular walrus habitat nor suddenly native to the area, and does not negate the original point.

          You are soooooo unbelievably moronic Jesus Christ.

          moron

          Not an argument. It was a bad situation and the walrus was probably going to end up dead, stay mad.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You are soooooo unbelievably moronic Jesus Christ.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      People literally started imprissoning cats inside tiny appartments because "m-muh birds" but completly ignore how we're the reason for massive coyote population. Humans are fricking moronic

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Kinda reminds me of the ATF
      >OMG there are children being abused in a cult in Texas!
      >Let’s burn the fricking building down and gas them to death after we shoot their dogs

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The Waco siege was justified. All of the critics are neo-confederates.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Hey guys you know what would be really cool? Let's have our pictures taken on top of the ashes of all the children we burnt alive

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Koresh lit the fires himself once he saw the feds coming to shut his dicky pipeline down. Unfortunate but true

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Liberals are insane.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *