We need to get to space so we can put cats on other planets. In other galaxies even.

We need to get to space so we can put cats on other planets. In other galaxies even. Eventually the Milky Way and Andromeda Galaxies will collide destroying all life in both galaxies.
Before that happens, we need to export cats to another galaxy. Cats are a miracle of the universe and should not die with this lousy planet.

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    count me in on this plan

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is some bullshit you’d see on reddit

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    cats are vile and parasitical (all predators are parasites) animals, and should be rendered extinct like any other parasite if they can't be reprogrammed to no longer engage in parasitism
    https://www.hedweb.com/abolitionist-project/reprogramming-predators.html

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    We need to get to space so we can put morons on other planets - and then leave them there, without protection

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    That’s the reason for the Secret Space Program.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Oddly enough I agree with OP.
    We have to ssve the cats and pupps.
    We have to explore other dimensions, it's a good way to start!

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    AGREED. Enjoy my cats.
    https://youtube.com/channel/UCv3fB3JrXH3SWv20oflBVEw

    https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLmLMnyzw_v3Eq7S4kicVrDIsH_hTX3vDQ

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      you're cats retarded bro

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Just White Kitty.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      your cats look gay

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        🙁 They're very much straight.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Have you ever considered that's because they are right. Why does flat earth has such legs? All kind of people talk about it, and growing. And the points they make are not stupid at all. The globe becomes increasingly stupid to me.
    Especially thinking through things like that

    I never thought about that.

    I ran the numbers on those calculations years ago. Don't remember the exact digits but the centrifugal force is negligible. This is no doubt why this retarded pic doesn't actually run the numbers.

    >the centrifugal force is negligible
    no, definitely not. I don't need to calculate something to know that. I have been on carousel. The more you go to the center, the less stressful is the feeling and the push to the outside, until you reach the center where the centrifugal force is 0. So the earth has a centrifugal force going from >1000mph at the equator to 0mph at the pole.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >All kind of people talk about it, and growing
      gays talk about Love Island, that doesn't make it kino.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Also, sit on a carousel that spins once every 24 hours. How tell me you can feel the centrifugal force, retard.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        If it was a carousel with a radius of 4959 miles then yes you would feel it rotating once per day bc you would be traveling very fast (1040mph) at the edge in order to complete the one per day revolution.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Why would I feel it?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Because you are traveling at 1000mph and since you are going in a circle, you are also dropping at over a mile a minute. You would definitely feel that

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              A mile? More like 200m. And compared to gravity, that's nothing.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Oh wait, actually more like 60m haha

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >poles are flattened and earth bulges miles up at the equator due to earth rotation
        >we can't feel the rotation

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I agree, cats are awesome but I doubt they could survive such inhospitable conditions in space. The Van Halen belt is a real challange. My cat has ESP.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Escaping the Milky Way Galaxy is impossible. I hate how stupid you gays are. Really I do.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      lmao just set up a light years long highway of high power lasers and push a light sail ship up close enough to c that the trip takes subjective days EASY

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      We just need to find access to the warp. Its probably a real thing.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    not political, fuck off moron

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Use birds combined with Ai to control the ship because they can survive on grains, seeds and berries so you could automate a growing system to feed and clean up after them.
    They are highly social so they will use teamwork and are also very intelligent doing better than cats and dogs in most tests for intelligence.
    If you want to get real complicated have hamsters to generate power because batteries can always use a recharge.
    Ai can save the animal waste products to fertilize the plants to feed the entire system.
    Then when you have found life that is small enough to be eaten by cats or dogs have Ai clone a cat, dog, bird army.
    Or just go full mayhem clone army and release all kinds of what ever abominations you can imagine.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wouldn't the cats kill all the bird pilots though?

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >this thread
    Toxoplasmosis is wild lmao

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Terminal toxoplasmosis.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    i fucking agree

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    nothing will happen to life when they collide, unless you are extremely unlucky on your little rock that your star gets caught by a bigger star and thrown out of the galaxy ripping the solar system apart. But the distances between the stars are so wide that this is very unlikely to happen.
    It's much more likely, that a brown dwarf passes through our system throwing all the planets out long before the collision happens.

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    We are going to crash in to the large Large Magellanic Cloud first.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6j7S2j4kbzo

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      no, the cloud is way smaller than our milkyway, so it will crash into ours.

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Cats don't like microgravity though.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It just needs more time to get acclimated

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I'm convinced that fake space/flat earthism's revitalization is a result of cityfags not being able to see the night sky from their disgusting sprawls

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    > Cats are a miracle of the universe and should not die with this lousy planet.

    That's some serious gaslighting.
    Cats are disgusting, evil creatures who exist to spread disease and unhappiness.
    Sending them throughout the galaxy, should they find other life, would undoubtedly be accepted as a declaration of galactic warfare, and quite possibly lead the actual destruction of our planet.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Other planets will be grateful to have cats strengthening their native biomes through natural selection.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Cats are disgusting, evil creatures who exist to spread disease and unhappiness
      You spelled dogs wrong.

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It took over 500x as long for us to go from stone to bronze as it did for us to go from bronze to gunpowder and horses. It then took us just a few hundred years from that depending on the location to go to the V2, U-2, nazi prototype stealth and intercontinental bombers, the SR-71, and so on. Anyone who actually believes in flat earth and doesn't use it as a shitposting device is hopelessly retarded. White Men put other White Men on the moon and it was the greatest achievement humanity has ever made.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      To fully put it in perspective in 1903 the Wright brothers took their first flight. 40 years later there were heavy bombers capable of carrying and surviving nuclear payloads. 12 years later in 1955 the U-2 took its first flight. 9 years later the SR-71 took its. The V2 speaks for itself. There are other examples of course but these are the main ones. People really don't appreciate the amount of engineering that went into these projects and how they paved the way for spaceflight, all the way down to the U-2's flight suit.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      To fully put it in perspective in 1903 the Wright brothers took their first flight. 40 years later there were heavy bombers capable of carrying and surviving nuclear payloads. 12 years later in 1955 the U-2 took its first flight. 9 years later the SR-71 took its. The V2 speaks for itself. There are other examples of course but these are the main ones. People really don't appreciate the amount of engineering that went into these projects and how they paved the way for spaceflight, all the way down to the U-2's flight suit.

      >muh ~~*mainstream*~~ history tho
      History as you know it is a lie designed to hide God and your divine connection to him. Educate yourself:

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        If I were going to worship any deity it wouldn't be one made up by sandmorons.

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Based thread

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The entire galaxy needs to worship cats

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Lol, epic.

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      nice try satan, but you're retarded

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I ran the numbers on those calculations years ago. Don't remember the exact digits but the centrifugal force is negligible. This is no doubt why this retarded pic doesn't actually run the numbers.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Also the earth spins at ~1000mph at the equator and only 100mph near the poles, so planes traveling from a northern location to a southern location would need to magically gain sideways momentum/speed to travel in a straight line while heading south. Where do they get the hundreds of mph extra sideways speed to keep up with the rotation of earth? Also airplanes don’t need to dip their noses down to account for curvature. Also there is supposedly a bulge of water 27 miles high at the equator due to the centrifugal force caused by earths spin, but never does a plane need to increase its altitude 3x the height of Everest when it crosses the equator. The entire model is fucking retarded and only believed bc people dogmatically follow the teachings of scientism without ever giving any critical thought to the unsubstantiated claims they have been falsely told are verified truth.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          did you skip high-school physics?
          first of all, planes travel relative to the atmosphere, and while air currents are indeed affected by the Coriolis effect, the effect is quite lessened, and it's no problem at all for a plane to adjust its course along the way
          the same goes for dipping down, planes do indeed do this, but the necessary change in angle per distance to account for this is so minuscule that it's not even remotely noticeable, and pilots simply keep a given altitude, even the natural variation in altitude from other effects is likely much larger than this change
          lastly, this "bulge of water" notion makes it clear you don't understand basic physics
          it's not like there's a giant bulge precisely at the equator, retard
          it's a steady slope all the way from the poles, again so minuscule relative to the distance between those points that it's imperceptible as you're traveling
          in fact, the amount you have to "dip down" along the way is far larger, and is already negligible
          the only thing that's retarded here is you, because you are doing what you're accusing others of, namely dogmatically following morons on the web who don't understand basic physics rather than actually thinking critically and gaining an understanding on your own

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Lighthouses prove earth is not a globe.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nice try CIA

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Your ball is dead. Now cope harder.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Elevation 10m
          moron are you blind? Both photos are way above 10m lmao. gay moron can't even source decent photos for his psyop shite.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Educate yourself:
            We can see too far:
            https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEzivhxtxgbsRfA1jEZsHFDJ3JJNeQkkB

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >other galaxies
    We can't even go to another star dude. You're asking retarded monkeys who can't figure out how to take the bus across town to circumnavigate the globe.

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Oh ok

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Space is fake.
    Earth curvature does not exist.

    Prove it for yourself. Learn what the official mathematical ball earth curve is and then try to apply that to reality. 3 miles distant horizon and then things should drop exponentially due to the nature of a ball. It's all science fiction. But what you see on high altitude footage is flat for hundreds and thousands of miles. You can connect any two given points on the earth with a straight line, without any "earth curvature" between. And you have to realize that on a ball there is actually no flat surface whatsoever.
    Saying that you are "not high enough" just shows that you have no idea what the earth curvature SHOULD be. If you still think the surface in this webm (which goes in all directions) becomes a ball at some point, then you have a masonic planted mind bug that you have to overcome.
    What is that supposed balls circumference? The supposed size of the sun? No, it's simply flat. Exactly as all ancient civilizations knew, and exactly as the bible describes the earth. Stationary, with pillars, with ends, with a firmament that has lights in it. And these lights are all the same distance and focal point, all the same size, dots in the firmament. Wake up.

    Earth curvature calculator:
    https://dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/?d0=10&h0=6&unit=imperial

    Freemasonic god exposed:

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You can literally see the cruve in that webm

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        You imagine to see a curve, we are trained to think that way. Maybe you see some slight camera distortion at the fringe of the shot, or different lighting. The surface is pretty damn flat for hundreds of km. This contradicts the "ships over the horizon" thing.
        At least 500 kilometers in both directions, probably more, and it's flat. No curve between 1000 km of surface.
        There is not a sudden corner at the end of that horizon. It will be just as flat in all directions when you reach that horizon. How can that ever become a ball with a circumference of 40,000 km?
        And look at that giant sun.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Checkd. Based. And This.

      We can see too far:
      https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEzivhxtxgbsRfA1jEZsHFDJ3JJNeQkkB

      Sunsets/ Where does the sun go?

      https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyHwsN1Rg4IqA_ZqjXvtHsjLlksN_CS8u

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        it is important to realize that a spherical earth necessitates a GEOMETRIC HORIZON, not an APPARENT HORIZON. an optical horizon dependent on atmospheric conditions caused by refraction is literally exactly what we would expect to see on a flat earth, and it is exactly what we DO see. a spherical earth with a given radius of 3959 miles, on the other hand, would necessitate a limit to how far we could see regardless of atmospheric conditions and/or refraction.

        the phenomenon of a moving visual horizon known as atmospheric refraction has never been shown to take an object hidden behind a curve and bring it back into view. watch this if you want to see how refraction actually works:

        ?t=315

        also, please note that objects disappear from the bottom up as you move away from them due to perspective, atmospheric lensing and atmospheric distortion. It’s a very well documented phenomenon. notice for example the evenly spaced balcony floors of the 2nd picture in picrel, and how they progressively get "smushed" into the horizon the closer to the bottom of the building they are. Regardless though, the major takeaway of these videos should be that the buildings shouldn’t be visible AT ALL. The entire city skyline should be completely hidden by earth’s curve.

        You cannot zoom into an object to make it visible again once the object has disappeared around a corner, that's impossible. if we can see an object that is too far away, which should be hidden by the Earth’s curvature and is not, that is absolute PROOF that earth is not spheroid in shape, especially when all factors such a “””refraction””” and geographical anomalies are taken into consideration such as in this repeatable, highly controlled and highly accurate laser experiment:

        also, see:
        >Ships over the horizon:
        https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyHwsN1Rg4IrRn4efSuyOl4AkEmcvrCMo

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Checkd. Based. And This.

          We can see too far:
          https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEzivhxtxgbsRfA1jEZsHFDJ3JJNeQkkB

          Sunsets/ Where does the sun go?

          https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyHwsN1Rg4IqA_ZqjXvtHsjLlksN_CS8u

          Space is fake.
          Earth curvature does not exist.

          Prove it for yourself. Learn what the official mathematical ball earth curve is and then try to apply that to reality. 3 miles distant horizon and then things should drop exponentially due to the nature of a ball. It's all science fiction. But what you see on high altitude footage is flat for hundreds and thousands of miles. You can connect any two given points on the earth with a straight line, without any "earth curvature" between. And you have to realize that on a ball there is actually no flat surface whatsoever.
          Saying that you are "not high enough" just shows that you have no idea what the earth curvature SHOULD be. If you still think the surface in this webm (which goes in all directions) becomes a ball at some point, then you have a masonic planted mind bug that you have to overcome.
          What is that supposed balls circumference? The supposed size of the sun? No, it's simply flat. Exactly as all ancient civilizations knew, and exactly as the bible describes the earth. Stationary, with pillars, with ends, with a firmament that has lights in it. And these lights are all the same distance and focal point, all the same size, dots in the firmament. Wake up.

          Earth curvature calculator:
          https://dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/?d0=10&h0=6&unit=imperial

          https://youtu.be/qLQYmve6WHc

          Freemasonic god exposed:
          https://youtu.be/pG-IG7oxwJI
          https://youtu.be/kqLwrscMOog
          https://youtu.be/542la0wR3ww

          daily reminder only garden gnomes spam flat earth in places they cant censor where people talk about their crimes so their media can call anyone talking about their crimes flat earther

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            so mind fucked by the garden gnomes you unironically believe in space solely because of your cognitive dissonance

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Truth and based.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Your math is wrong.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          No it’s not. And it’s not “my” math, it’s your own model’s math. You can find any curvature calculator on Google which will confirm that the math is correct for for a ball earth with a radius of 3959 miles. We can see too far. Your ball is dead.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yes it is.

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    one of my trips, i saw the clouds form a big apex above me, one side was a huge eagle with widespread wings, otherside was like a human form but buff like an big buff black guy...

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I fail to see the benefit of any of this.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The benefit is that cats will survive forever. Are you telling me there is another lifeform in the universe that is as cute and cool as a cat? The universe will be immeasurably lesser without cats in it.

      It won't destroy all life, most models put the number of stellar collisions in the single digits. The worst outcome would be Sagittarius A becoming a quasar, but the galactic habitable zone shouldn't be affected.

      Also cats are the morons of pets.

      I don't like the odds. Millions of stars and planets will just zoom past each other without destroying everything? fat chance. We will probably get slingshotted into deep space by some passing star systems gravity.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Space is reaaaaallly empty

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        You're not getting to space, bro. Only the corporate elite are going and their families, you will be left here with the rest of us. They have chosen to get a head start and leave the rest of us with a horrible handicap that will ravage what is left of us for hundreds if not thousands of years. It is there plan to prevent us from catching up with them and competing for what they want. That was what the vaccine was for, anyone who took it will have to overcome the genetic damage that it brings.
        They are evil.
        Global revolution is required.
        They must not be allowed to access the stars.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Thats retarded. Theres no way the rich people could go start a space empire lmao. How are they going to construct anything without peons?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            robots, idiot
            haven't you heard?
            You've been replaced. You're obsolete farm equipment.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              You watch too much sci-fi my dude. You can't seem to comprehend the logistics of what you are talking about.
              The robots would require constant repair and power. They would need robot factories. it would take decades at least to send robots to build robot factories and make a robot society in space.
              Aint no rich people alive that have that much lifespan left.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Aint no rich people alive that have that much lifespan left.
                It's not the human body they wear, but the demonic alien symbiote that resides within them. The Queen of England will only die when see gives her last kiss. Watch the headlines and screencap this.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Scholz's star passed through the oort cloud 70k years ago and stars passing close by our solar system seems to happen once or twice every 100k years. These have no real effect on our solar system. The distances involved in the merger would on average be far greater than the sun-scholz flyby.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Millions of stars and planets will just zoom past each other without destroying everything?
        Space is empty, REALLY empty, you won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly empty it is... and so on. Space is so empty that when NASA or RSA or JAXA send probes through the asteroid belt they don't actually bother to take the motion of smaller asteroids into consideration because the odds of running into something are so astronomically small that it's not worth considering.

        Put it this way. The average mass density of our galaxy and Andromeda works out to about 0.001 solar masses per cubic lightyear. You can estimate the collision frequency moving through a population as f = ~n*σ*v where n is the number densities of the populations, σ is the cross-section for the collision, and v is the average relative velocity between you and the population.

        So let's take n ~ 0.001 / ly^3, σ ~1 ly^2 (we'll say any star system coming within a lightyear of ours is 'disruptive'), and v of the colliding galaxies is going to peak around 300 km/s. That gives us a collision frequency of 1/1,000,000 per year.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >nature abhors a vacuum
          >99.99999999999999% of nature is a vacuum
          Pick one. Gravity is nonsense and doesn’t even make sense conceptually.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            You understand that pretending to be retarded for a cheap dopamine hit causes actual brain damage, right?

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Andromeda Galaxies will collide destroying all life in both galaxies.
    Wrong.
    >Cats are a miracle of the universe
    Wrong.
    >and should not die with this lousy planet.
    Wrong.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Are you saying the galaxies wont collide or it won't destroy all life?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It won't destroy all life, most models put the number of stellar collisions in the single digits. The worst outcome would be Sagittarius A becoming a quasar, but the galactic habitable zone shouldn't be affected.

        Also cats are the morons of pets.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >good boi pupper doggorino redshit gay
      >likes annoying barks all hours of the day, slobbering, disgusting licks, stinkiness, fur feels like shit, get in the way when you're cooking or doing anything, watch you while you try to eat, all around annoying
      What a gay. I bet you let your dog lick peanut butter off of your dick.

  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is the highest quality thread on pol rite now.

  33. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    too late dawg

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I really want to understand the mind of the person who made this image
      bro edited a 3d model of a snow leopard into a star trek uniform and gave it qui gons haircut and beard

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        You wouldn’t understand mom

Your email address will not be published.