>we can't protect animals and nature without killing humans

>we can't protect animals and nature without killing humans
Bros.. what the frick. What are we supposed to do? We're Savitri Devi and Ted Kaczynski right?

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >we can't protect animals and nature without killing humans
    >Implying humans are not animals

  2. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    She could have been saved if she just married me instead of fricking some stupid indian

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      You would stick your dick in THAT?
      whatever, your funeral

  3. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >noooooo muh nature muh animuls
    weird how you think you are separated from an ecosystem just because you went to elementary school and were told a thing or two by some radical idealists like greta. either you embrace being human or retreat back into the wild and go live with the snakes and coyotes in the wilderness

    we'll shoot you for sport later

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Exellent bait anon

  4. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    You got it. Uncle Ted warned us, people just don't want to listen.

  5. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Humans are nature moron

  6. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nature will kill humans for us, just wait for the asteroid.

  7. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's true. Economy is dependent on an ever growing population, and that means less and less habitat for animals.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Economy doesn't rely on always expanding. It just needs to make room as the population goes up. You can have an economy where it's not "be richer than last year" solely and requires ever expanding to accomodate that. You can level out or just make the same or something. But most places seek to obtain more. It's more parasitic in nature these days and it doesn't have to be. And I say this as a staunch capitalist. You can have systems where you go "well damn i guess i made enough to be well off and dont need anymore im good". But the way things are structured is to constantly seek more and more and more at every cost. Whether it's interest, population growth, just plain greed, etc.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Economy without growth is cannibalism.
        If you are "making money" without any expansion, it means you are taking wealth already made and redistributing it.
        Or do you mean no one should make more money, and everyone freezes where they are economically? good luck convincing the poor to not try and grow the economy AND to not take everything you own.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          the growth of economy is directly related to the growth of human population
          mass sterilization + heavily enforced 2 child rule worldwide to lower the number and keep it stable

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            It clearly isnt, with the world's wealthiest nations all in population stagnation or decline, depending on their immigration policies.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          >implying

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            Implying what? Your chart agrees with me. Were you aware of that?

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              >implying the less well-off shouldn't just redistribute some of that accumulated wealth at the top

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >shouldn't
                Not in any moment of my post did I imply what is right or wrong.
                Pointing out a fact is not saying it something to be had or not.
                But thank you for admitting that you agree such an act is economic cannibalism.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                the economic cannibalism is the rich people eating up all the resources homie not the other way around
                and this is currently happening in your "I'M EXPOOOONDING" economy

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                No it isn't. What you describe is economic growth. Creating wealth where there is none before. Acquiring and utilizing resources.
                Cannibalism is when you STOP growth, but parts of the population still make money.
                You don't seem to understand the difference between "I created a resource and used that to make money" and "I'm just going to take what you made."

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >he really thinks the top of the graph isn't siphoning their money from everyone below them, and their wealth just spontaneously appears from "creating wealth and utilizing resources"
                holy moron batman

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >siphoning their money from everyone below them
                You think billionaires made their value by just taking it from the people with barely 10% of the worlds wealth...
                That is idiotic.
                The rich EXPLOIT the poor to create their wealth. They aren't taking their wealth from the poor. The poor don't have wealth to take.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >semantics

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                Idiot.
                No. Getting slaves to dig diamonds out of the mine is not the same as taking diamonds from the poor.
                One grows the economy, one does not.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                No i just don't want to explain to you what wage theft is and how the average person is getting shafted in various ways that aren't immediately apparent and the widening wealth gap within America that has nothing to do with random third world slaves because i'm not paid to

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >what wage theft is
                Not economic growth.
                That you can names things that hinder growth doesn't make exploitative growth no longer growth.
                >America that has nothing to do with random third world slaves
                Lol
                Go to bed, kid.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >takes half a sentence out of context
                1/10 for getting my (you)s but points docked for being too obvious now

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                btw if you don't know exactly what tactics walmart deployed to supplant long-standing establishments to become the primary shopping center of america this conversation is over stop replying moron

  8. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >humans
    Look at the population density map

    We only have to kill africans, indians, the chinese, and any american with an individual net worth over 2 million.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Are you saying we should "just kill non whites"

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Density
      >Africa
      So just Niger
      >India and China
      You forgot all the other asian countries that force their kids to work in sweatshops and deplete their ressources, so really you could have just said Asia on this one, they pollute a whole lot

  9. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    We are supposed to not be idiots and it's not that damn hard.

    We just need to stop killing everything else without killing ourselves.

    This isn't a fricking trolley, it's a planet, who the hell is that in the OP and why should I care that she's hysterical?

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >ignores the reality that the average person is motivated only by selfish purposes
      >we just need to x
      There is no we.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        this, we only reached our current state because we are selfish as frick, true altruistic beings like ants don't even have a chance because they don't frick over/kill each other to advance their own interests
        what really fricked up the planet though was the human theory that every human life is sacred and worth the same, it leads functional people to foster useless eaters and nature destroyers

  10. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    What we need is a radical material simplification

  11. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    What kind of drugs do you need to take to make your pupils that big?

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Pure synthetic serial killerium without any milk.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        What kind of drugs do you need to take to make your pupils that big?

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      No drugs, this is simply the natural state of the hypercarnivorous female, most likely right after eating an aborted white fetus. Large pupil size could also being an indicator of impregnation via homosexual Black persona basketballensis or "Canis" """lupus""" ovivarious.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        holy fricking brainrot

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      real answer: diphenhydramine, typical over-the-counter sleep aid. Taken in large enough doses you will trip balls in a very bad way and then walk around with pupils like this for a couple days.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      I've seen someone on acid with pupils almost that big.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Mdma causes more pupil dilation than lsd.

  12. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe nature made us for a reason, because afaik we are the only thing capable of blowing up our redirecting an asteroid.

  13. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yup

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *