UwU

UwU

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Everyone should open a bees farms and grow fruits and vegetables in the balcony

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They're more like (|^|)

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    kawaii…

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's more like (`w´) with these guys tbqh.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    OP's image is upside down.
    Those "mouths" are light detecting organs.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That makes so much mores since. Couldn't see how OP's things turned into bees until now.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      are you sure its not the bees that are upside down?

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why are they uwuing?

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    God they look like mini aliens sleeping, how cute jsjaks

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    as far as i know nutritionally red meat straight up mogs insects as food

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Be a large amount. Turns out beef is full of stuff good for us, from cholesterol than is very good for hormones to very easy to difest and absorb nutrient, be it broteins and fats or trace minerals, specially liver and organ stuff. Insects are a good feed for chicken, fish or pigs tough. In terms of nutrition Fish and seafood mogs insects and that's why we should try to not fucking poison the literal producer of nearly infinite food than is the ocean wtih micro plastics and heavy metals. Dump them in bangladesh or some other shithole. You can make plastic like substances out of seaweed too so if our "elites" did indeed want to save the planet they wouldn't have invaded iraq and instead they would have gone full on making giant seaweed farms.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the only time in their life they're comfy.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >environmentalistfags get everyone to farm bugs instead of regular livestock
    >agriculture becomes 100% reliant on artificial fertilizer made from a finite natural resource 70% of which is in one country
    >massive plots of land useless for agriculture but suited for livestock goes unused

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Agriculture is already 100% reliant on artificial fertilizer. People who do meme farming without it are driving up the cost of food on a planet without enough of it for the population.
      Also insects require less land, water and feed than cows by a lot. Like I said earlier though, so does chicken. A pivot to more chicken could accomplish the same short term stop gap which bugs would. However the only long term solution is to keep the population of humanity on Earth below 4 billion.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        We have enough to feed the HUMAN population several times over.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The fuck do you mean by that? A small amount of stress has caused the market to break down and you think it's totally fine? Or are you alluding to much of our crops going towards animal feed? Don't be such a vague retard.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            He probably means blacks aren't human.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Fun fact: those 3 dots are the bee's other eyes.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    why should we eat worse food so we can have more people? population is the single worst thing for crime, education, global peace, and the environment. the earth can support more people if we completely destroy human rights and force most people down to an "uplifted bronze age" state like poor brazilians who are allowed to ride rudimentary motor scooters and get 5 hours of electricity and running water a die, yes, but why would you want to?

    OH RIGHT. ponzi scheme economy crashes without exponentially more greater fools to pay in to the top fag's bags. the world would be destroyed if corporate profits and welfare were crippled and it would totally be worse than an overpopulated earth even though the economy is based on things without real value.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      the population is heading towards levelling out you fucking sperg. Get out of being 17 mentally.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Will still take a lot of time untill it levels out and there are too many people already.

    • 1 month ago
      AppallingApustasa

      Most countries are set to decline in size. 1990 was over 30 years ago

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why are people pretending the amount of calories your food animals need is the only relevant variable? Cattle ranching requires tons of space. If you had a cricket farm the same land area as astockyard, let alone a whole ranch, you would be doing Iron Man numbers in crickets

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Hand over your money now, this is the price of free-dumb.

    Tee-hee, get it?

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/07/01/britain-pay-eu-95bn-brexit-divorce-bill/

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >schizo thread

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You can go to any of the official stuff and they will explain it. They unironically speech to push the 2030 agenda is you will own nothing and be happy.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why do they have pixel art faces?

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If honeybee pupa cells are uncapped like this, it’s usually because they’re infested with varroa mites. They breed and reproduce in the capped cells and if workers detect them, they chew it open to reduce their numbers.
    These sleepy guys are in trouble.

    • 1 month ago
      AppallingApustasa

      Nice

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    :<

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >you vill live in ze pods and eat ze honey

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Honey is the only product made by insects that humans consume in massive amounts.
      No honey for you, you vill eat the corn syrup Imitation. (with dried cockroach cum sprinkled in)

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Do they add the roach cum? Is there a farm full of male roaches getting milked for their bug goo just so global elites can troll the proles?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          For an objective analysis of that issue you probably will need to ask on Wrong board

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Do they add the roach cum? Is there a farm full of male roaches getting milked for their bug goo just so global elites can troll the proles?

        For an objective analysis of that issue you probably will need to ask on Wrong board

        Realistically it just would make no sense. Bugs eat a horrendous amount of resources relative to their mass. This feels more like rich people pulling our legs "And then I told them we would make the eat bugs HAHAHAHA! And ze believed it! Ze are probably still shrieking about it!"

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Insects actually use less resources per available calorie from consumption than beef or chicken, though I wouldn't eat them for that. Chicken is pretty efficient already so just getting 50% of beef consumption replaced with it would make a huge impact.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Insects actually use less resources per available calorie from consumption than beef or chicken
            That actually makes literally no sense. Insects are subject to the laws of physics too. A single grasshopper might need proportionally less calories than domesticated vertebrates, but in return you need like thousands of them to reach the same mass of meat for human consumption.

            But mass =/= nutritional value. So you'd need even more of them than beef or chicken of the same quantity.

            Also eating insects is disgusting and I will not stand for it.

            https://i.imgur.com/0Ma8qJO.jpg

            I don't get the bug meme
            Why not farm columns of mollusks and seaweed? Why push for insects?

            >Why not farm columns of mollusks and seaweed?
            Probably because the ocean is so full of microplastics, I honestly cringe pretty hard at eating anything from it. You might as well eat your bank card directly.

            But I would support seaweed, it's a pretty cool concept. It's a shame I've only seen it used in Japanese cuisine.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >A single grasshopper might need proportionally less calories than domesticated vertebrates, but in return you need like thousands of them to reach the same mass of meat for human consumption.
              And a chicken is made of a trillion cells so therefore it must take a nuclear reactor to run one, right? The quantity does not matter. If an insect expends less energy to exist and house compared to their equivalent caloric quantity of chicken then it's more efficient. This is how chicken can be way more efficient than beef. They put a lot more of their input energy into making meat.
              >eating insects is disgusting
              It's like eating any seafood other than fish. Your revulsion is purely cultural, since insects have historically not been a good, farmable source of food. I'm skeptical that the numbers actually work out, but if they do then a company will profit from doing it and you will eat the bugs or you will spend more money on food than everyone else. Welcome to capitalism and its consequences.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Bugs are a good way to recycle waste, even sewage, into food without all the trouble of keeping pigs

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I would not trust such a process. We put too many durable compounds in our waste streams, such that they remain in the environment for years. An insect isn't going to decompose a lot of it.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                That's why the people that actually matter (the ones pushing bugs on others) aren't going to be eating the bugs.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Those people aren't eating any supermarket food at all. They will eat beef and chicken raised on small farms out in the middle of nowhere, using frequently tested water and feed. And yes they will eat the bugs (for signalling purposes), but not the ones for proles. Their bugs will be similarly cultivated using known pure stock.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >If an insect expends less energy to exist and house compared to their equivalent caloric quantity of chicken
                But why would it? I need to see some proofs and math of this.

                >It's like eating any seafood other than fish.
                Well I'm from a landlocked country, so we don't really eat fish either. Or seafood. Honestly, fish stink to high heavens, before, during and after cooking. I don't know why anyone would wanna eat them.
                I mean don't get me wrong, I love fish. Have an aquarium of 54 liters. But I prefer them as pets. Not..food.

                >Your revulsion is purely cultural
                Respectfully I disagree. All our lives we encounter an animal group of which 95% are pests and just make life miserable for everyone? Flies, mosquitos, eusocial wasps, lice, bedbugs, moths, locusts, various bugs and insects that ruin crops? (I intentionally left out spiders as they're mostly beneficial, but one of the most common phobias is arachnophobia, and it's probably genetic)
                And on top of that they're the furthest from us from an evolutionary perspective too, they look alien and disgusting. The revulsion is pretty understandable if you look at it this way.
                It's why entomologists had been ostracized and viewed as abnormal in history. That and their tendency to creepily pin disgusting things onto displays.
                In my language we sometimes call others crazy by saying they're "concerned with bugs" (roughly translated)

                That's why forcing this eating insects thing is so wrong. For example, hopefully you wouldn't tell an Italian to abandon their cultural heritage and history, and start being more like the English, and not only because it's culturally insensitive or downright fucking racist, but because England itself is deHispanicable.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >If an insect expends less energy to exist and house compared to their equivalent caloric quantity of chicken
                >But why would it? I need to see some proofs and math of this.
                Don't have any, but, humans burn most of our calories in our heads so our potential yield as meat livestock is very poor.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >our potential yield as meat livestock is very poor
                a-anon...
                Why would you even think about that?
                But yeah, I've heard a theory that apparently we're too bony and lean to be worth preyed upon, so shark bites are usually accidents.
                I think it might just be shark apologist propaganda, cause hominoids had plenty of predators in history, before humans slowly, but surely eradicated them from existence. It's why I think letting bears, wolves and such back into areas where they've been extinct for hundreds of years is a bad idea.
                Most of Europe is safe, precisely because they were BTFO'd, along with any cave hyenas, lions and other varmint that deserved our ancestors contempt.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Wolves in the US are remarkably peaceful and europeans following our lead are going to learn the hard way

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Wolves in the US are remarkably peaceful
                Probably because they're a wildly different species, and smaller too?

                Look at this map, it shows the official recorded wolf attacks in France. If they were preying on livestock and domesticated animals that would be bad enough on its own, but they were attacking children and people. They even had to have an official branch of government that dealt with their extermination.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >And smaller
                No. Those are coyotes. Our wolves are fucking gigantic except for the eastern ones. And yet cougars are more likely to attack you.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Well, you should exterminate cougars too. Don't you wanna make your country safer for your children?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I choose to breed more cougars to solve childhood obesity.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                The reason he said your revulsion is cultural is because there exist cultures which eat insects as part of their normal diet. If another culture does something which you find gross or reprehensive, chances are your disgust is cultural. Yes, this includes shit like eating the dead and circumcising babies. Just because we can justify why it's objectively bad now to do those things doesn't mean our revulsion toward those things was always 100% rational. And of course there are things that we hate irrationally just because of our cultural associations (e.g. eat da bug? no no no no bug gross!!! icky!!!!!)

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Revulsion towards child mutilation is pretty rational unless you want to go full stirner.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >The reason he said your revulsion is cultural is because there exist cultures which eat insects as part of their normal diet
                Now hold on, okay, they may eat SOME insects, but you can bet your ass they're repulsed by the rest of them. It's like how we eat tomatoes but don't go binging on deadly nightshade.
                also this

                Revulsion towards child mutilation is pretty rational unless you want to go full stirner.

                We do vaccinations on children who cannot consent to save their lives. Same cannot be said for circumcision. it's abhorrent.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Honestly, fish stink to high heavens, before, during and after cooking
                if your fish smells before cooking, its rotting and not fresh
                if its fresh fish, use something acidic, like lemons or whatever, during cooking and thatll remove the fishy smell

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >But I would support seaweed, it's a pretty cool concept. It's a shame I've only seen it used in Japanese cuisine.

              bro, all of coastal east and southeast Asia uses seaweed for food

            • 1 month ago
              AppallingApustasa

              Ffs.

              Some animals create protein laden meat with fewer calories than others do. Sometimes dramatically less.

              The difference in calories necessary to grow a warmblooded animal vs a coldblooded one is already about an order of magnitude. That alone can more than explain why insects outperform cows or pigs or even chickens.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >but in return you need like thousands of them to reach the same mass of meat for human consumption
              except they can be fed food waste like the shitload of veggies that never even make it to market because they're shaped weird, the resource and space cost is way lower pound for pound
              >Also eating insects is disgusting and I will not stand for it
              I would agree except I like prawns

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Beef yes, but the feed to conversion ratio of chicken is the same to crickets. This is well studied, it takes the same amount of calories to get a pound of chicken as it does a pound of crickets.

            Its 2.1. Two pounds of feed gets you 1 pound of chicken.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              except you cant grow chickens in a warehouse shelf, you have to have a lot of room because of animal rights or some garbage, crickets can be grown vertically, which is the only real benefit

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                First of all false they literally do grow chickens on shelves. Second the real issue is the sheer amount of crickets required would actually use up more space then 1 chicken.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >per calorie
            Terrible way to calculate the worth of a food. You have to weigh factors such as nutrient density as well as the actual bioavailability of those nutrients, alongside other realities of farming the animals in question. Can you effectively keep several million bugs in a farm while guaranteeing that your stock will neither escape and wreck the local environment nor be contaminated by intruding wild species? How well can you sort, clean, kill, process, and package them? How about parasites--many insects carry many of them, and while they tend not to jump species and infect humans, will that remain true when millions of people are eating millions of bugs (and their parasites)? Even if they can't ever jump species, hairworms in grasshoppers don't infect humans, but they can cause intestinal discomfort anyway, is that acceptable? For that matter, do we even know for sure if the human body can actually live on insects as a staple protein? No existing human societies do--bugs as food are now either delicacies, seasonal supplementary protein, or famine food. What happens if we replace meat with bugs and in 50 years we find out whoops sorry haha turns out if you raise someone on bugpaste the chitin slowly builds up and calcifies the brain?

            These and more are questions that we don't yet have answers to, and the people insisting on bugs as food simply don't want to even consider them, insisting that we just have to trust it'll be fine and completely replace the meat industry with bug paste warehouse farms. Sorry, no thanks.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Your concerns are tilting at windmills. Bringing up all kinds of shit which you don't actually have an understanding of. Tell you what, go PROVE any of the shit you're fretting over is an actual problem. Funny you use 50 years as a long term frame. Our diet is nothing like it was 50 years ago, and that diet was nothing like 50 years before that. Culturally, diets are dramatically different and usually without any issue. We're not delicate eaters, humans, and nobody is forcing you to eat new foods. Stop acting like a histrionic woman.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Stop acting like a histrionic woman.
                ironic

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >One person is flipping about about being forced to eat bugs as part of the new world order in just two more weeks
                Sane and grounded
                >Another person is telling the sperg that culture is variable in space and time, that your worries are insignificant and only take from your enjoyment of life.
                Your honor, this woman has lost her composure!

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >posts a walls of text
                >y-you're mad

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Wall of text
                You mean

                >per calorie
                Terrible way to calculate the worth of a food. You have to weigh factors such as nutrient density as well as the actual bioavailability of those nutrients, alongside other realities of farming the animals in question. Can you effectively keep several million bugs in a farm while guaranteeing that your stock will neither escape and wreck the local environment nor be contaminated by intruding wild species? How well can you sort, clean, kill, process, and package them? How about parasites--many insects carry many of them, and while they tend not to jump species and infect humans, will that remain true when millions of people are eating millions of bugs (and their parasites)? Even if they can't ever jump species, hairworms in grasshoppers don't infect humans, but they can cause intestinal discomfort anyway, is that acceptable? For that matter, do we even know for sure if the human body can actually live on insects as a staple protein? No existing human societies do--bugs as food are now either delicacies, seasonal supplementary protein, or famine food. What happens if we replace meat with bugs and in 50 years we find out whoops sorry haha turns out if you raise someone on bugpaste the chitin slowly builds up and calcifies the brain?

                These and more are questions that we don't yet have answers to, and the people insisting on bugs as food simply don't want to even consider them, insisting that we just have to trust it'll be fine and completely replace the meat industry with bug paste warehouse farms. Sorry, no thanks.

                ?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Our diet is NOTHING like it was 50 years ago
                Yes, we were all farming snakes for our main source of protein just 50 years ago. The transition to beef, pork, and chicken was hard for many. We were just getting used to snake barbecues, which replaced badger barbecues 50 years prior.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Actually yes

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >t. Incan guinea pig eating gay

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Between 1800 and 1900 a major food source in the US was pigeon. They were hunted by the million for decades to fill the enormous demand for squab.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I don't get the bug meme
          Why not farm columns of mollusks and seaweed? Why push for insects?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It's about hostility to the present culture. Nothing more. Not progress. Destruction. The thing you already do is bad, here are 5 options that are all better. Not one, because then people wouldn't fight over anything. And you have to hate the thing you already do rather than doing two things. Get it?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              the present culture is pushing for food to save the planet (eat the insect bigot) so the true hostility and destruction is pushing for more meat and more seafood.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Bingo. Not just that but they seek the humiliation that comes with it. They'll be in their nice mansions with private security (after pushing for gun control, of course) eating their filet mignon while you're eating grasshoppers with a glass of cockroach milk. Lol at the size of your average Indochinese male and tell me if you still want to eat bugs.

              People in power tend to be psychopaths and also freaks in general because those very positions of power mostly attract those kinds of people.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Now if the globoschlomos did THIS, I'd be down for it. I love clams, oysters and scallops. that shit's tasty! Too bad they're deadest on crickets and cockroaches.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Occam's razor leaves one explanation - the elites hate 99.6% of all humanity and want to trick/force as many into doing bad stuff as possible

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >hate 99.6% of all humanity
              Do you hate farm animals? We're beneath their contempt. They hate each other, but not us. We're just cattle to them.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                It's like you didn't read the very first post that started this conversation

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Why not farm columns of mollusks and seaweed? Why push for insects?
            Its not about what is most efficient or what is most nutritious. Its about putting the "peasants" in their place. Its about the humiliation and degredation of the masses to a point that they start to wonder if life is even worth living. Then at that point they will stop having children and its a soft genocide. They want to get rid of us, but they dont want to just go full on death camps. If they were putting people into camps there would be resistance. This way people just choose to not give birth to the next generation, and slowly the die off of the "useless eaters" is achieved.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It's because meat is a status symbol and they want the masses to lower their standard of living.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          It has certain benefits but they "solved" your doubts by making bugs expensive

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/Ro8VsNM.jpg

          >Insects actually use less resources per available calorie from consumption than beef or chicken
          That actually makes literally no sense. Insects are subject to the laws of physics too. A single grasshopper might need proportionally less calories than domesticated vertebrates, but in return you need like thousands of them to reach the same mass of meat for human consumption.

          But mass =/= nutritional value. So you'd need even more of them than beef or chicken of the same quantity.

          Also eating insects is disgusting and I will not stand for it.

          [...]
          >Why not farm columns of mollusks and seaweed?
          Probably because the ocean is so full of microplastics, I honestly cringe pretty hard at eating anything from it. You might as well eat your bank card directly.

          But I would support seaweed, it's a pretty cool concept. It's a shame I've only seen it used in Japanese cuisine.

          > you need like thousands of them to reach the same mass of meat for human consumption
          >But mass =/= nutritional value. So you'd need even more of them than beef or chicken of the same quantity.
          You're wrong.
          Ackually people would need to eat less insects to get the same nutritional value as 1 pound of meat.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous
          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >96 calories for the same amount of protein
            This is not a good thing. We evolved to eat a diet that's mostly fruit, nuts, and tubers supplemented with occasional meat.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              That's what he said. You don't need to eat much insect for the same animal protein. So the rest of your diet would be the same fruits, nuts and tubers.
              And really the insects would mostly be processed into something which is nothing like an insect. Imagine the reverse happening. A society full of insect eaters and they find out some people eat cows. They say "ewww gross, you mean like they crunch on hooves and faces? Imagine all the fur, bleh".

              why should we eat worse food so we can have more people? population is the single worst thing for crime, education, global peace, and the environment. the earth can support more people if we completely destroy human rights and force most people down to an "uplifted bronze age" state like poor brazilians who are allowed to ride rudimentary motor scooters and get 5 hours of electricity and running water a die, yes, but why would you want to?

              OH RIGHT. ponzi scheme economy crashes without exponentially more greater fools to pay in to the top fag's bags. the world would be destroyed if corporate profits and welfare were crippled and it would totally be worse than an overpopulated earth even though the economy is based on things without real value.

              You have insight, but I doubt the trajectory will change even if everyone knows the end game.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >A society full of insect eaters
                Why hasn't that already happened yet? Cultures that don't have a problem eating bugs seem to always only eat them secondarily to actual livestock.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                because insects fucking suck as a primary source of protein and the people arguing otherwise are fucking insane

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                It was a facetious question. But yeah, you're exactly right.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Because insects aren't actually good sources of protein or any of the other nutrients meat provides, and an aversion to bugs is likely natural and only overcome via desperation, cultural pressures following a period of desperation, and being part of a demographic which has a generally reduced disgust response owing to a small and less active amygdala.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >This is not a good thing.
              Eat your fruits, silly dumby.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Fruit is a manmade product created by centuries of selective breeding. It’s also seasonal, no one evolved to eat mostly fruit.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Fruit existed before man, just smaller and seedier.

                >This is not a good thing.
                Eat your fruits, silly dumby.

                Fruits are also low in calories and the ever important fatty acids your body needs, as well as many vitamins and amino acids only found in fish, eggs, and meat.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >100g needs 2000+ liters of water
            No fucking way. You’re telling me that each individual cow (weighing 750kg) needs 15600000 liters of water? Over like 2 years? Bogus as fuck data

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              It's real.
              The figure includes all the water consumed in the irrigation of crops used for feed, which accounts for the majority of it. Cows are stupidly inefficient at turning feed into meat.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                you are telling me that each individual cow needs 21,369 liters of water a DAY to survive?
                cows are out there drinking nearly 900 liters (or 237 gallons) of water an HOUR?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Old McDobson had a farm

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You absolute dumb fuck I told you it's the irrigation water. When you eat a head of lettuce you're consuming like 40L of water because that's what you have to irrigate with using traditional methods. Hydroponics can get you down to 4L but this is not commercially viable.
                Crops use a ridiculous amount of water and an adolescent cow consumes 15-20kg of dry high protein hay a day while growing.
                You want to argue? Go find a flaw with the source material for all these pop sci articles. They didn't all just make it up.
                http://www.waterfootprint.org/Reports/Report-48-WaterFootprint-AnimalProducts-Vol1.pdf

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >simply cannot believe that cows drink that much water. thats more than their bodyweight per hour anon
                but really thanks for the info anon, ill check it out

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              https://i.imgur.com/toWJgSV.png

              you are telling me that each individual cow needs 21,369 liters of water a DAY to survive?
              cows are out there drinking nearly 900 liters (or 237 gallons) of water an HOUR?

              Probably includes the water used for the cow's food as well as the water that gets soiled and has to be changed before it can all be drank

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            100 fucking grams of insect Jesus Christ.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              For almost no fucking calories whatsoever. You know, the things some of us non-amerifats have trouble getting enough of to stay over 130lb.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Also, isn't chitin something which can be harmful to humans?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                you're meant to make them up by consuming massive amounts of processed grain product.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Do insects have the essencial aminoácids to build muscle?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              no.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm pretty sure there's plenty of protein left over in poo, maybe we should start eating that? It all makes sense when you run the numbers

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Idk why they chose bugs as the solution instead of just telling fatass muricans to eat less

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    lol bye

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I wonder how tasty honeycomb is.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        like cardboard covered in honey

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I'm surprised you haven't tried any. It's like cheap chewable candy made of beeswax that squirts honey. Beeswax is technically edible, but it's not great so you just spit it out when the honey gets depleted.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Contact your local beekeeper and you wont have to just wonder anymore.

          Sheltered. What you buy from others isn't the real deal, dumb city slickers.
          The real deal has larva in it and it tastes like absolute fucking dogshit.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You don't take honey from the brood chamber and the queen excluder prevents larva from being placed in the super. If you're getting larva in your super comb then you have hive beetles or you're too retarded to isolate the queen.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >dumb city slickers

            LOL quit larping anon, you clearly have no idea what a queen excluder is. And if you've actually kept bees you must be dogshit at it. Looks like

            You don't take honey from the brood chamber and the queen excluder prevents larva from being placed in the super. If you're getting larva in your super comb then you have hive beetles or you're too retarded to isolate the queen.

            already called you out

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Contact your local beekeeper and you wont have to just wonder anymore.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        very tasty

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        i like chewing the wax. its just a bit too expensive for regular consumption i think

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        it tastes like salty coins

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          and milk?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I tried it when I was younger, the chewing part is pretty nice. The crunch of the honeycomb with the soft and sweet of the honey is a really good texture but then you kinda have to deal with the wax itself as it turns into a chewing gum situation.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Its more about the texture, but you can buy honeycomb either from a bee keeper or if you have a hipster grocery store they might have some.
        Reminds me of wax lips, but honey flavored.
        If you can get local honetcomb it can help fight seasonal allergies.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Get fucked slaves

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    tasty

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Shh... They're sleeping...

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Dreaming of murdering you and everyone you care about.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    cute

Your email address will not be published.