This is ridiculous

This is ridiculous

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This board is fun, I regret not coming here sooner.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Duck bill
    >Fur
    >Poisonous
    >Gives milk
    >Lays eggs
    >Looks like a beaver
    >Only two of its order and the other one has fricking quills

    This is ridiculous, someone clearly sewed a bunch of carcasses together. They expect us to believe this shit?

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Primitive tyrannosaurids had feathers

    Did this arise independently or via hybridization with another related theropod and represent a split rather than a continuous line of descent towards t-rex, or did t-rex have undiscovered elephant fuzz?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Primitive tyrannosaurids had feathers
      this assumption is possibly false.

      Dilong and Yutyrannus had feathers

      whether they're primitive tyrannosauroids is open for debate and should be debated.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    It's always funny to see norwood 3, greasy, fedora wearing midwits like you sperg out the moment religion is brought up kek.
    Go touch some grass.
    Pro tip: the moss and fungi in your gaming chair don't count.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you're schizophrenic

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >get categorically btfo
      >u r probably ugly reeeeee
      Most ugly and fat people are christian, statistically, due to that moronic false faiths prevalence in the lower class south. Gods most mocked people for following a religion that basically makes them slaves to a foreign power (israel) and implores them to deny basic observable facts of nature. Deist chads win again. Protip: the bible is fake and its god is not real does not carry the same meaning as there are no gods at all. A lot of people believe in a god but deny the grandstanding demon of israel. No creator god would lie about his own creations, after all. The earth is obviously not 6000 years old.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >lower class south
        Just say blacks anon.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What about fundie republicans and hispanics? Being fat and moronic doesnt see race, but christians sure like to go forth and multiply their waistlines.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Being fat and moronic doesnt see race
            Yes it does. Look at American demographic statistics. Obesity per capita is black Women > hispanics generally > black men > White women > White Men > asian men > asian women.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Sneed.
        Rent free.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        its kind of funny that every study that ever correlated religion with low intelligence actually correlated low intelligence with less liberal sects with the global south and the rural US. more liberal sects associated with acceptance of things like evolution are associated with higher IQs, slightly higher than atheists even, because there being some god somewhere is a rational conclusion. just not the exact one detailed in the bible.

        Anglicans, for instance, stand toe to toe with israelites in IQ and fully accept evolution and state that genesis ought be taken as a morality play rather than a history book.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >jews in IQ
          Artifact of germanic blood. Does not apply to shephardim or mizrahim.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This.

          >get categorically btfo
          >u r probably ugly reeeeee
          Most ugly and fat people are christian, statistically, due to that moronic false faiths prevalence in the lower class south. Gods most mocked people for following a religion that basically makes them slaves to a foreign power (israel) and implores them to deny basic observable facts of nature. Deist chads win again. Protip: the bible is fake and its god is not real does not carry the same meaning as there are no gods at all. A lot of people believe in a god but deny the grandstanding demon of israel. No creator god would lie about his own creations, after all. The earth is obviously not 6000 years old.

          Next time read the whole article and make your own conclusions, only reading the title of a study is not a very intelligent thing to do.
          Believing in a God is rational, yuo are just a midwit.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Believing in a God is rationa
            Uhhhhhhhh who created God?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Animals and nature?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > Pro tip: the moss and fungi in your gaming chair don't count.
      Lol

      >jews in IQ
      Artifact of germanic blood. Does not apply to shephardim or mizrahim.

      Likely true

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >someone dislikes the 24/7 christ-schizo shilling on Wauf that is likely all one redditor that came here via /misc/ or Wauf
      >better call them fat. now i win.
      there are 4 threads on the catalog attempting to make reference to christian ideology and creationism. All of them capitalize the first or all letters of the church name for the demiurge. Countless other threads are infested. All attempting to espouse anti-nature ideologies such as creationism.

      You redditors spill all over this board like your gut spills over your pants.
      https://www.purdue.edu/uns/html4ever/1998/9803.Ferraro.fat.html
      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3358928/
      https://abcnews.go.com/Health/Diet/faith-fat-religious-youths-obese-mid-life/story?id=13204624
      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3767098/
      https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2884643/How-having-faith-makes-fat-Religious-people-likely-overweight-compared-atheist.html
      >no but reddit is atheist doe!
      Wauf isn't christian, you're just flocking here from reddit (where you feel less welcome) because you think the neo-nazis would like you more.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >baptist
        Black.
        >catholic
        Spics.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >keeps insisting reddit is somehow christian or that any actually remain there
        >the website that was one of the first hosts of the over-a-decade-old-fedora meme in r/atheism
        You might have had a point if you didn’t say this

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Reddit is both atheist and christian because atheists and christians are both homosexuals.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That thing must get great reception.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Imagine believing antlers could be real. These "scientists" (preachers) are just making shit up. The things on their head in fossils are just tree branches. Speaking of branches, they lived in the WOODS. These "antlers" would just get caught on everything and get torn off their head. Goes against Darwinism's belief of survival of the fittest doesn't it?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That raises a very good point, on what basis are we to assume these are permanent structures on the sillydactyls?

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    One of its species is called Nyctosaurus lamegoi. I'm not joking.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah that's because it's missing its membrane.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    They’re sea going pterosaurs with a similar niche to an albatross what exactly are they going to bump into?

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Is this why dinosaurs went extinct? They kept having misscariges?

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >This is ridiculous
    I agree. No self-resepcting pterosaur would leave the home practically naked like that

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the whole dino industry is a fricking joke, at this point they are just mocking morons that believe in this scam

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Explain dinosaur bones in the ground then lol
    The bible was made up by schizophrenic desert people. None of it is accurate in any way, and if any of it has a divine source the divine truth has been grapevined into oblivion. If it is 100% true, it was transported here from another world because very little of the things it asserts to be fact are true here on earth.

    Assertions that satan somehow made up the whole historical record are not founded in the bible mind you. Rather, the more biblically accurate position is the real bible is lost and the current one was created by false prophets, which is why its god no longer performs great miracles for his people. Maybe he got pissed because the false prophets binned the extremely detailed accounts he gave us of the late cretaceous (with hand drawn illustrations) and now people argue over t-rex feathers.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >First, we will read A.L. Peck's translation of Aristotle's Historia Animalium IX.32.6-10
    >Here the English word adulterated is translated for the Greek word memoicheutai, an inflected form of the word moicheuo. It could have just as easily been translated cross-bred or mongrelized.
    This is utter nonsense.
    The page is trying to say that the cheating interpretation of "adultery" is wrong, and that the original Greek writing should be understood to mean racemixing.
    If this were true, we should expect to see that parts of the Hebrew bible translated into the form of Greek in question should use different words when speaking about "mixing" and "coveting/lusting".
    What we actually find, however, is that the Greek and Hebrew words coincide with eachother.
    There isn't a verse where the original Hebrew's meaning is mistranslated with a different word in Greek. The Hebrew, Greek, and English words are consistent in their meaning when talking about taking another man's wife.

    This completely destroys the book's central argument, that the Greek translation led to a misinterpretation of the meaning of adultery.
    Galatians 3:28, cope and seethe.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      good job BTFOing the schizo anon, that was fun to watch

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        wow
        is that megalodon?? so stunning…

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Where are the tank high heels?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        fixed

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    nice strawman. I never said birds were not dinosaurs. I agree that birds are dinosaurs. I'll even go as far as state that birds are reptiles.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Preposterous, even!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/zINbqvQ.png

          https://i.imgur.com/fZpJJkq.jpg

          Preposterous, even!

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    We know Nyctosaur didn't have a sail because we know what pterosaur bones that actually supported sails look like.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      anime eyes

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >We know Nyctosaur didn't have a sail
      because

      https://i.imgur.com/es1jH9r.jpg

      This is ridiculous

      is what happens when you let women decide what is attractive.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >this is ridiculous
    as if this shit from today's birds isn't?
    dumbass

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Pterosaurs are not even dinosaurs for fricks sake. The whole birds are dinosaurs discourse fricking rotted people's brains i swear. You could as well post a bat for some moronic argument, at least it's wing structure is more similar

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Pop science and it's consequences has been a disaster for human race

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Didn't claim pterosaurs were dinosaurs, it's literally just a comparison to a modern day animal. That's all. It's called a "analogy". They'll teach you about it next year when you reach the 3rd grade.

      • 1 month ago
        elipo

        when the frick did i ever say they were birds you fricking moron, i'm comparing flying shit from today to flying shit from then, learn how to read

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why are birds so fricking gay?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ugh this is postmodernism. the real animal looked like this, liberuls.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >t. low test

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >The evidence in question

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Wtf thanos dino this is just like my marvel movies!!!!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >the actual evidence in question

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      a 3rd worlder npc can't into comparative anatomy.
      >>find a neck vertebrate nearly identical to a neck vertebrate from a more complete fossil, but in a geographic and spatially distinct place.
      said neck vertebrate as clearly related to the more complete fossil animal because of their similarities, but because of the differences, geographic and spatial differences they clearly aren't actually the same animal.
      "HURR DURR THEY MAKE UP ANIMALS."

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >You hate my hecking THANOS-provax-blacklivesmatter-transrights-feathersaur???
        >You're an ummm an NPC!!!
        Lole

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Not an argument. Leave the thinking to the educated people, ok?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Copy the opinions of the "educated" people, n-npc!
            Double lole

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Vacuum your floor.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I agree this proves they exist but i think is moronic to reconstruct the full animal with so little material

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          it's just reconstructed as a generic member. just like the old illustrations of spinosaurus with generic theropod heads. in the absence of proof that it is divergent it would most likely remain conservative like most animals, and thus it is so presented.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          it's just illustrative shorthand for explaining what kind of dinosaur it is. no one will understand if they write that it is a brachyrostran abelisaurid.

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >No, these are based on evidence. Fossil evidence. These things really existed and it's a pretty conservative depiction because it probably had pycnofibers all over the fricking place or god forbid, a fricking sail.
    >If you want totally made up shit, read the bible. So many things it presents as historical fact are in direct conflict with all recorded history from multiple kingdoms and empires that the church says "well, it is divinely inspired, god is totally speaking in metaphor through his chosen prophets" or something as a magical cop out that leads to hilarious theoretical situations like christians not being sure if they're allowed to have sex with aliens that are practically identical to human beings, but not exact.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I know the bottom right is the bison, what are the other ones?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        elephant, zebra et rhino

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I know the bottom right is the bison, what are the other ones?

      Stupid of me, just realized left is the elephant.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      the hypothesis of there being a skin flap between the bones is basically ruled out. we tried that, anon. the crest bones are basically smooth all around. there'd need to be attachment points for any connective tissue to be useful.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Look at this zogdump. This is what Glorpists want us to believe? Why the crug would a bleeble like this evolve?
    >Muh sexual selection
    My plink. They're making zog up for ganymedian credits.

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What is it?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        A bio weapon

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    its nothing, look how tiny this guy is. not really impressive...

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    https://i.imgur.com/jZXLntt.jpg

    They're just plagiarizing movies now, this is pathetic.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Retroactive meme magic. BRAVO LUCAS

      https://i.imgur.com/YaTSSaZ.png

      [...]
      >No, these are based on evidence. Fossil evidence. These things really existed and it's a pretty conservative depiction because it probably had pycnofibers all over the fricking place or god forbid, a fricking sail.
      >If you want totally made up shit, read the bible. So many things it presents as historical fact are in direct conflict with all recorded history from multiple kingdoms and empires that the church says "well, it is divinely inspired, god is totally speaking in metaphor through his chosen prophets" or something as a magical cop out that leads to hilarious theoretical situations like christians not being sure if they're allowed to have sex with aliens that are practically identical to human beings, but not exact.

      This. The flying homosexual obviously had a huge fat lump on its back.

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >horned screamer
      >doesn't scream

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They should be renamed horned honkers

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >horned screamer
      >doesn't scream

      They look like fancy pigeons

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You'd think so but it and the other two screamers are, strangely, more closely related to ducks then any other bird.

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I can't believe we missed out on Lambda shuttles

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Mammalchuds just can't comprehend things different from us so it must be fake. I bet if birds didn't survive nobody would be able to believe or accept that they look the way they do in reality with so much variation.

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Missing feathers

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Im certain the antennae were covered in colored feathers like a carnival prop

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Okay now that's based. Really sad the illustrator failed so miserably.

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >die next to a tree branch
    >goyentists millions of years later draw you with a tree branch for a head

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Trust the science, whatever it may be today.
    Everything in the past is wrong, nothing is set in stone.

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It looks kind of dumb, like a finger and a thumb in the shape of an L on its forehead

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Not. Funny.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        nah frick you man, I thought it was funny

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They hated him because he spoke the truth.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Based

      Not. Funny.

      homosexual

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      These crazy fossils just dont stop comin'.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Not. Funny.

      These crazy fossils just dont stop comin'.

      Well, the years start comin' and they don't stop comin',
      Back to the rules so I hit the ground runnin'

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/o4WmzUH.png

        >the actual evidence in question

        I imagine these had to have served a purpose in sexual selection. Nothing grows larger without good reason

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Hehe

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Nice.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Not. Funny.

      I laughed at both posts.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Nicely done

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Not. Funny.

      Is this funny?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >altrighty tries to be funny
      The funnier part is how sad this is.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        youre mentally ill

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What's ridiculous? They obviously derive nutrition from lightning.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *