>Puppies are the perfect litmus test to see how human someone is as it also extends on how they see everything else. puppies are pure innocence. They can do no evil. All they do is be cute and play. They will love you more than they'll love themselves. How much you love puppies tells us how human you are. If you love a puppy it shows you have morals. You are person with empathy. You feel guilty that can't reciprocate that kind of love back to them. There are lines you just won't cross. You are a good person. If you're indifferent then you're not a bad person per say but you're not good either. You're a robot. You don't care about anything. If you don't like puppies you are a disgusting being. All puppies know what to do is to play and love and despite it you are disgusted by it. You can't reciprocate emotions back. You see them as beneath you and you laugh at people who puts the effort to take of them. You see them as a waste of time and effort to take care of them. You're incapable of caring. You're not human. You're a monster.
Just by writing this post I know you are a shitty person.
Kittens are already hard enough but puppies? No, just no.
>In your mind, you are a powerful and enlightened ubermensch.
Eat your words you gasbag lobotomite, don't speak of shamelessness when you've just been proven so completely wrong
Essentially none of that amateur-level psychoanalysis is true.
My brand of autism does come with chimp like spergouts which are mainly targeted at my home appliances, myself, and random public fixtures like elevator buttons and hallway paint, which I have sometimes keyed or broken in frustration. I freely admit it.
I actually behave like I do simply because I hate people for being posturing morons, along the same lines as your attempt to hit on an insecurity of mine that doesn't exist, and I love to be as obnoxious as possible in any situation in order to bring discomfort to normalgays
I've just told people to keep their animals in check in public, and they sheepishly comply
I'm actively malicious and I hate puppies because they shit all over the place and they serve as crutches to lonely people who should just pay the price for their bad lifestyle and kts from loneliness instead and because they demand attention which is inconvenient for the owner and others around them
None of this is inhuman, it's very human, and it's also very human to neurotically pontificate about morality using a random aspect of life like pet ownership. You're stupid and that's very human too
>thread is about puppies
>catfags instantly shit it up
catfags? who's talking about cats?
it's the pseuds who shit this (already garbage) thread up
Moral realism really is stupid though. It's preferences all the way down. Thankfully, for the most part, we have similar enough preferences and measures in place to deal with those who have deviant preferences. I'm happy for the religious people but if you're smart enough to consider metaethics in the first place you're too smart to experience the happiness that comes with their certainty. You are doomed to be a weird little fucker who understands the arbitrariness of his axioms. This doesn't have to be a huge deal. You just find a way to deal with the ennui and move on. Maybe learn to play piano or something.
Holy fucking shit dude. It's about putting yourself in the same position. It's really not that hard. This tangent shows you're really nothing more than a selfish autist who bases good or bad on what it says on a book. Seriously what the actual fuck is wrong with you?
>Veers off into random tangent about empathy and secularism
Not that anon but please understand that there are billions of people who live in cultures where your meme argument is basically insane and nonsensical. Yeah, no shit it feels bad to get screwed, that isn't a moral basis to be a harmless little goody-two-shoes, it's a reason to screw others before you get screwed yourself.
You take a high-trust society for granted but ironically lack the empathy to understand that other places don't work the same way, and that your same reasoning doesn't mean jack shit to people there.
Morality is based on empathy mixed with common sense. You don't go around not killing people because it's wrong and you'll go to hell for it but because they are people with their own lives and troubles. Their family would be devastated if anything were to happen to them. Wouldn't you be devastated if something happened to any of your family? This extends to our pets since we take care of them. Seeing how you have little empathy it doesn't like you're much of a moral person but more of a coward who does right out of fear of going to hell.
>no argument again
you're nowhere near as intelligent as you think you are
also, saging the thread because you're getting btfo in an argument is really pathetic
>makes statements without justification
>expects others to spend time deboonking his (non-existent) arguments for him
>nobody wants to waste their time on this, as it is clear you don't know how to make coherent arguments
>"heh, another internet argument won."
Universal morality was innovated by Christians, so I guess it's not surprising to see such a failure to understand morality coming from a garden gnome.
Your opinion is being dismissed because you don't know how to form a logical argument, and then you demand other people take you seriously as if you had something worthwhile to say.
Imagine a tennis player who threw hammers at you while insisting you keep playing tennis with her. And then when you told her "you're not playing tennis, though," she demanded you give her a good serve, as if that would change anything.
No. You can either learn to convey your point rationally and subordinate yourself to a higher standard called reason and evidence, or else you can talk to yourself.
>Only humans are important.
>If you disagree, you are at odds with everyone who does agree, and as a human, your beliefs are incompatible with your continued existence.
Not him but this isn't an argument either
>I am HUMAN. Everything I like is HUMANS. HUMANS are THE MOST IMPORTANT. Anything that doesn't put HUMANS first is BAD.
>All morality follows.
This is not an argument. It's a temper tantrum.
>things that detriment humanity.
Humanity is an abstract concept. You can not point to a humanity, so you can not understand what's good for a humanity or bad for one. "Detriment" is undefined and "things" is ambiguous. The statement has nothing to do with morality, either.
>I'm right because uhhhh... I'M JUST RIGHT, OKAY??!?!
>how to identify a pseud: the post(s)
An anon succinctly defined morality in another thread in about 1/20th as many words. You're throwing around buzzwords, just blindly hoping you've picked the right ones, and you can't even explain why veganism is bad.
As expected of a socialist.
and you won't elaborate on why you believe that because you can't
>I define evil as, strictly, things that detriment humanity.
Nah I like pit bull puppies. A lot of them are very sweet. It's just that they also make me sad because once they turn 3 months old I know "the change" is coming and soon I'll have an unpredictable bite goblin on my hands. This is where it goes wrong for the pit mommies. They fall in love with the puppy and forget that one day it'll be a dog. The same is true for every breed but it's rarely so dramatic as the pit.
You are kind of right, kind of not right.
If it's just about loving something that is innocent or being able to empathize with an innocent creature, children are the same. Only the problem is worse if you don't like kids, since if you don't like children, you are rejecting that which is necessary to carry on civilization, the continuation of which you take for granted. If you don't like children, then you are literally a biological toxin from the perspective of civilization.
I think actually the races of the world who have historically been around dogs have been changed, genetically, the same as we have changed them. Humans' lifespans are increased and health is improved when they have a dog, partly due to being happy, having more endorphins, less cortisol from stress. If used for hunting or as a guard dog, a dog can literally prevent you from dying. Affinity for dogs is probably an evolutionary advantage that is exclusive to those groups of people who had close contact with dogs, which explains why White people have it and Arabs/Nogs/Changs do not have it.
i bet a lot of that lifespan increase is because they have to haul their fat ass round the block every day when they have a dog
>i bet a lot of that lifespan increase is because they have to haul their fat ass round the block every day when they have a dog
fat fingers typed this post
Wow, petfags really are retarded. Angelicizing animals as "pure innocence, do no evil." Pure craziness.
>Angelicizing animals as "pure innocence, do no evil." Pure craziness.
Animals are innocent and can't do evil things, though.
Christian nonsense. Predators are evil. Suffering is suffering. If the xenomorphs landed you would not be confused about this.
Liking a puppy doesn't necessarily mean a person would be good but tells us is more of a probability of how good a person could be while not liking a puppy is a certainty that the person is a piece of shit
Nah, that's retarded.
John Wayne Gacy tortured, raped and killed boys from 12-18 then buried 28 of them in his crawl space.
One victim who lived detailed his attack. He was sodomized with massive dildos and repeatedly held under water until he passed out only to be allowed to be revived and have the process repeated over and over.
He had a puppy though. He claimed the foul smell in his house was the dog having accidents. Who wouldn’t want him as a neighbor. Clearly 10/10 human being.
Pets deserve longer lifespan
everything you say is also true of kitties but for some reason we have to put up with your sociopathic evil ass making 15 cat hate threads a day.
I like kitties to tho. Is just puppies reciprocate emotions more than kitties do
cats reciprocate emotions too, it's just that dogs are specifically bred to be easier for humans to read. cats just have different body language.
no kitties will play kill if have the chance fucker
killing is not pure innocence
no creature made to kill can ever be pure innocence
all cats are pure evil
your cat would kill you if it could
>literally and unironically FUMING about kittens
i kill kittens no big deal
no you don't
you right i just steal them and drop them far away from their momy they kill themselves
you don't do that either, impotent LARPcel
>literally and unironically FUMING about kittens
imagine spending your time posting your kitten murder masturbation fantasies on Wauf
your denial is adorable you can't do anything to stop me
i recognize you. you're always posting these LARPs and can never prove it.
you're a larper, and a pretty bad one.