Pitbull Question

Will it ever be answered?

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Turnspit dogs and other working dogs were allowed to go extinct when their role in human society vanished, and they were harmless little things mostly. Why Pitbulls are still bred makes no sense.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Theoretically it could be a nice initiative to rehabilitate the abused animals instead of just putting them down. Realistically YOU SHOULD FUCKING NEVER TRUST OBLIVIOUS NORMIES WITH THAT. I mean, what were they thinking. The dog like that needs to be medicated to reduce the aggression, heavy use of the muzzle, like constantly keeping the guard up while pushing the training (non violent!). Honestly, even then idk if the dog can recover enough to be safe and trusted. You can’t just push them to random family and hope for the best.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Correlation is not causation.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    When did everyone become such a bleeding heart on Wauf?
    It's good that people are getting mauled.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Americans are too stupid and stubborn to accept facts and truths.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I suggest resettlement to the east (coast).

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    blame the owner, not the breed you breedist chud

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If the owner had any other breed, there would most likely not have been an attack. Huskies and greyhounds, like the vast majority of non-retriever and collie dogs, have stalk/chase/bite prey drive for very small animals and livestock types. Pitbulls have prey drive for everything. They see us like chew toys. They are simply dangerous and attack for reasons only experienced dog trainers can comprehend.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Pits arent human aggressive. They have high bite statistics because of popularity

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Pitbulls are less than 10% of the dog population. The german shepherd is the third most popular dog and third in fatalities. The #1 and #2 dogs don't even register (labs and goldens).

          They have high bite statistics because they are PREY DRIVEN TOWARDS HUMANS. They see us as prey. This does not register as aggression on any temperament test. Because it is not. Neurologically, the dog is not angry. They are excited.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >pitbulls aren't human aggressive.
          >HE WAS A NICE DOG HE WAS MY SONS BEST FRIEND I DONT KNOW WHAT HAPPENED HE JUST BIT DOWN AND STARTED SHAKING
          prey drive. it's the reason you should never keep a wild wolf as a pet. wolfdogs will stalk strangers, but not their owners, and will also stalk their owners children. we spent 20k years carefully breeding dogs so that instinct would never be triggered by us. today we have very friendly dogs that, at the absolute worst, might pick up an infant and then drop it if under stimulated and unsupervised. and pitbulls.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    crimes and violent murders in general have gone up, its not pibbles fault

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Huh?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/vI9grZP.png

        Hmm?

        hey king you are comparing per capita to overall amount

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/vI9grZP.png

          Hmm?

          https://i.imgur.com/UMKcpo0.png

          Huh?

          Here's the correct statistic to look at, total criminal homicides in the US since 1990
          in summary it's certainly going up however it's not in proportion to the pitbull attacks at all

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            it's certainly under reported because several democrat cities don't enforce laws anymore so nobody reports things

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I'm not comparing anything, I'm just disproving the statement that crimes and murders have gone up

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'm saying you're looking at per capita which is relative to population vs the OPs statistic which is total amount of pitbull attacks and NOT relative to population
            You have compared apples to oranges there, the one you posted now is actual totals so it's the correct comparison

            You should understand what information you're posting to disprove anything, just saying

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The initial graphs I posted were not in response to the OPs graph, it was in response to the post I replied to.
              When looking at crime and murder statistics and whether or not they're going up or down (ie: things are going better or worse) you SHOULD look at per capita

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >When looking at crime and murder statistics and whether or not they're going up or down you SHOULD look at per capita
                correct, but you can't make a comparison between per capita and total. It's meaningless. OP posted total pitbull attacks, anon claims total crime is up too. Per capita crime is totally irrelevant in this comparison

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/vI9grZP.png

        Hmm?

        You can literally see them going up at the end of each chart retard.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Look at the timeline on those graphs and then look at the timeline on OP's graph

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Hmm?

Your email address will not be published.