Violent breed or just a name tarnished by bad owners?
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Violent breed or just a name tarnished by bad owners?
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
I have a shitbull, I pop his elbow blackheads, push him and use him as a sentient pillow yet he never growls at me
Meanwhile my German Shepard is a b***h who’s hyperviolent
Test
>work on ranch
>have 4 aussies
>allowed friends to bring they own dogs from time to time
>"friend" brought a pittie
>told him to pack up his dog and go home
>gives typical pittie apologist retort
>"I'm not asking, i'm telling you, get off my property with that dog, because I WILL kill it if it attacks anything"
>arguing back and forth
>frantic barking
>people screaming
>his pitt is killing sammy (one of my aussies)
>run to truck
>rifle
>killed his pittie
>sammy is long dead
>he calls police
>he gets arrested
He also got charged with animal cruelty, trespassing, and destruction of property. He also took me to court over it and lost thanks to the security cameras i've got all over the ranch. Now I have a big ass sign at the gate in front of my property stating that pitt bulls will be shot on sight on my property for the safety of my livestock, aussies, and family.
Things that never happened but Wauf desperately wishes did
Bonus points for "pitt" in the vein of "doxxxx" and other terminally online misspellings
Didn't happen
More relevant than how aggressive they are is how capable they are of killing. A dachshund is statically more aggressive but isn't going to kill a child, ever. A pit can snap one day and kill your children after 8 years of owning them. It's a no thanks for me.
yea, they will eventually snap out of nothing. they are like russian roulette
>colleague shows his dog
>its a pitbull
>dude... a pitbull...? i hope it is a female?
>nope, male
>oh. i hope you castrated him?
>nope
>oh, but you walk with him a muzzle right?
>no, why?
haven't spoken him since.
i was about to make a pitbull hate thread. glad to see that there is allready one
>misidentified 30 out of roughly 300 pitbulls
like these misidentified golden retriever / labrador breeds?
imagine defending this
Based, virgin diaper shitters fear the chad staffy.
>labradors also bite a lot of people...
the labrador...
meet jeff, a cute looking labrador and golden retriever mix... also bit a child...
imagine being such a vile race that they lie about your lineage when they want to get rid of you
they should be banned to protect other people
When they got popular bad breeders inbred them-the ones that aren’t inbred are great the ones that are are questionable.
This. Bulldogs originally were used for nannying ("bull" meaning "protective" in old latin) children and were bastardized by edgy millennial white trash who want to use them for rap videos and delivering meth, which triggered aggressive mutations. My purebred staffy is a sweetheart and would never bite anyone and I let her walk herself around the neighborhood weekly.
one quick google search to disprove that "bull" means "protective" in old latin. this is a made up urban myth. the truth is that pitbulls are bred as fighting dogs.
often fighting in a ring vs bulls. (hence the name pitbull) or vs other dogs.
>the truth is that pitbulls are bred as fighting dogs.
Always see this misinfo repeated on r/banpitbulls but never seen proof, how convenient. Even if it were true it has nothing to do with harming PEOPLE and we could rehabilitate them to only eat pests in our neighborhoods, like rats or cats.
it doesn't really matter whatever their origin is.
it doesn't even matter if its the dog or their owner.
fact is that they are dangerous and they are responsible for so much misery compared to other dogs.
75% of all bites are caused by rottweilers and bulldogs. while they only make up such a small percentage of all dog races. wtf...
ban those wild animals.
75% of all bites are caused by rottweilers and modern bulldogs blah blah word salad
Neither are pitbulls. Glad we could clear this up!
spoken like a true pitbull owner
:')
None are pitbulls, you don't even know what a pitbull is, kek!
they are goldens/labs mixed with vile pitbull dna. as you can tell by their empty stare. the people offering the dogs leave out the pitbull part, because otherwise no one wants those dogs.
live that 66% dream boy.
whats so special about their owners?
Even if you ban shitbulls dog autists will just lie about it's genealogy, or move on to the next most aggressive demon breed.
Just make it 100% legal to shoot any dog not on a leash and any furgay that comes within 10 feet of you thereafter. Ez
>normal dog things, like killing a replaceable chicken
Violent breed or just a name tarnished by bad parents
>fila brasileiro
Just search “pit bull” in any Internet news search section and that should tell you.
More inherently violent than most dogs but greatly exagerated by the media and especially by the internet.
This media article cracked me up. It seems like a complete parody, from the title to the image they used.
Why hasn't anyone domesticated pitties yet?
>pitbullgays happy because the breed lives
>anti-pitbullgays happy because they aren't at risk to kill toddlers
I've never seen anyone bringing this idea up.
I've seen it discussed before. We'd have to get rid of all of the random breeding from backyard breeders and somehow find and stop people still breeding the pits for aggression for dog-fighting. Even then it still difficult to tell if a pit will be aggressive later in life, for example the pits in the Tennessee, where they snapped at 8 years old while not apparently show any signs beforehand. And there's the russian fox experiment that shows breeding the foxes for docile behavior changed their form so if we breed all of the undesirable traits out of pitbulls, they won't pitbulls anymore. Probably would get something like the boston terriers again.
This girl was attacked by a shepherd type dog (German Shepherd, Belgian Malinois or Dutch Shepherd)
censored youtbe video
uncensored video
https://my.mail.ru/mail/john_smith-1991/video/2/260.html
She was playing outside of her house, when off leashed shepherd dog sprinted towards her
Can't help but notice that her injuries are far less severe than when a pit attacks a child. She still has all her fingers and her face is intact despite the gnarly gash on her forehead. Pit bulls are a double whammy. By far the dog most involved in attacks and a combination of temperament and physiology means that if you are attacked, you can expect maiming and disfigurement.
i was bitten by a pit bull as a kid still have the scar on my arm
i was playing with a ball outside of my house near a forest path so the dog wasn't leashed
just saw the hall and sprinted towards me
they put the dog to sleep and the owner couldn't believe it since it was an older dog
now i'm scared of all dogs even the small rat ones
frick pit bulls.
It's a dog bred for fighting pits and it attracts morons.
They attract men, real men.
I don't care wether they're more prone to violence than other breed
If a pitbull wants to kill me for whatever reason, it will do so. If any other dog breed want to do the same, they will fail.
That is the only argument that matters
>If any other dog breed want to do the same, they will fail.
LMFAO I guess you have never seen a Belgian Malinois rolling up in a M2A3 Bradley. Other breeds can kill, numnuts
Pit bulls are not especially dangerous dogs for an adult man of at least average strength. In fact, pit bulls aren't likely to frick with you because you don't trigger their prey drive. They prefer kids and companion dogs. If you want a human killing dog, look at guard dog breeds. They're bred to be as scary and strong as possible, and the temperament the breeders select for is one that mistrusts strangers. Take the Filas here, who rich bastards in Brazil like to keep on their rural estates. They have a reputation for ripping the arms off would-be thieves and burglars. They're so dangerous that even if you've invited someone into your home, you shouldn't leave them alone with the dog.
The reason we don't have guard dogs running rampant and murdering people is mostly economics. Pit bulls are a deadly combination of bad temperament and wide availability due to our tradition of dogfighting. Which not all that long ago was considered an acceptable pastime. But they're not the most dangerous dogs of all or anything. They were bred to kill dogs, not men.
they are only like 8 percent of the entire USA dog population and like 65% of dog bites and mauling cases are from them.
Don't fall for anti-pitbull propaganda
https://my.mail.ru/mail/john_smith-1991/
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCtmHAWVjAwVhql7mjtjPsTQ/featured
https://my.mail.ru/mail/scott_smit/
https://my.mail.ru/mail/dallas_smith-1922/
Some of this shit breeds have some notable size. Not that it matters when all of them target children or the infirm. The worst kind of creature
denis
Pit Bulls are so fricking ugly, even putting aggression aside I don't see why anyone would ever want one if they're not some wannabe gangbanger. Even if you do want to larp as a tough guy there's a large number of other dog breeds that are plenty strong themselves that are much more intelligent and more physically imposing
Your odds of being killed by a dog bite are lower than being killed by lightning. If you are out walking on the sidewalk, you are more at risk of being hurt by a vehicle or a criminal than you are by a dog.
There are between 700 million and 1 billion dogs on this planet. 30000 human deaths a year are caused by dogs. If I were a betting man I'd like them odds.
So this is an anti-pitbull statement? Sorry I couldn't understand how much of a compelling premise you had pondered. You must be plagued by multiple savage pitbulls on a daily basis to have such an adverse reaction! Poor thing!
I bet you crease up at those funny face mime tiktoks right? Endless stream of talentless cucks makes you absolutely fold right?
Oh now you're pretending to have a life outside of being a spastic? That's adorable.
The gibbering of a moron echos through the air. No one hears a thing.
Very imaginative, I play tug with my 180lb champion fighting dog Ludo using a pig carcass while my assistant trainer Lenny whips him with a rusty iron chain. Usually we play deathmetal at full volume during this 9 hour sessions because it reverberates well off the basement ceiling. Wanna bring your 9 year old nephew round, we can pound cans of larger while he's chained up beneath our feet.
>>that person has a different opinion to me! you're a bot!
God it's like talking to a religious nutter
Got attacked by one as a kid so as a statistic I'll say put them all down
Reflects the videos I've seen and makes a lot of sense actually.
I genuinely think that ghetto nigs who keep shitbulls aren't the problem. White people who keep them are.
If they keep them in the ghetto and do dogfights with them, whatever, that's what this breed was made to do. And if one of them mauls someone, again, who cares? Nothing of value lost.
Meanwhile, when white leftist urbanoids keep them, they bring them into contact with civilized society, while also taking away their natural outlets (like dogfighting), therefore making them actually more likely to snap.
What I'm saying is shit in the toilet isn't a problem, but shit on the dinner table is.
The most mistreated breed of dog. All the ones I know, and the one I have, are some of the sweetest and supportive pups I have ever met. They are extremely emotionally intuitive. It breaks my fricking heart that people don't give them a chance to be the good boys and girls they want to be.
I think its both, because I have seen super well trained dogs fly off the handle. its just an unfourtunate breed that rolled off that slippery slope and is now stuck at the bottom with nary a way back up.
Both husky and pitbull owners act like they want to frick their dogs tbh. I call all doggays dogfrickers just to banter but I honestly believe husky and pit owners are their dogs b***h
I think way too many people have them. I hate the idea that some soccer mom brings one of these into their home while good family dogs rot away in shelters. The vast majority of the pitbull population simply shouldn't exist.
What's so special about pitbull owners?
Despite being 6% of the US dog population, pitbulls commit 90% of dog crimes
They also don't bite or attack any more or less than any other breed, but account for an overwhelmingly high % of all major injuries and deaths so yeah this breed specifically is a problem
shitty breed due to mass inbreeding and ghetto trash backyard breeders resulting in a large amount having literal schizophrenia
t. someone whose neighbor has this thing and it just hyperfocuses on nothing and acts absolutely terrified for no reason at all
once you notice it you will see it always, they're good but have incredible bouts of paranoia
They were literally bred to be aggressive fighters. The weak ones were culled in a survival of the fittest dog versus dog mass inbreeding program.
This. Same thing with small dogs. They're literally schizophrenic due to the extensive inbreeding they've gone through. People forget that incest doesn't lead to just physical defects like SMASHING and SLAMMING, it also leads to mental issues.
The closer a dog is to a wolf the less moronic it is, except when it's a husky. Huskies seem pretty moronic too, probably due to the inbreeding as well.
>Huskies are not naturally aggressive
Yes they are. Husky prey drive is hyper-specialized.
Small creatures contrasting against clear floors? There's a high chance you yorkshire will become meat.
There's dozens of videos of husky spontaneous aggression.
educate yourself
My friend claims it's males who haven't been neutered go crazy after a certain age but the rest are fine - any truth to this?
It's because "they look like wolves".
Because huskies are the most clear example of "strong aggressive instinct" in all dogs.
Explaining how a Fila, Dogo Argentino, Rotweiler, generic mutt, etc can harm a person gets real fricking abstract because their agression is multi-variable. Huskies less so. Pits somewhere in the middle.
I can also give you the same exact explanation with poultry-pointing dogs but I don't know their breed names.
Depends what you want in a pet. Snakes are mostly docile and barely need taming, harmless outside of a few python species + anacondas and venomous (all of which tend to have more restrictions on ownership than pit bulls, usually local but often state level), and are very low maintenance and don't need daily interaction with people to maintain mental health. They're great pets for people who want to care for something that doesn't require daily care, but still want something that can be safely handled.
Anyway my point is don't ban out of ignorance. Boa constrictors are generally in the 8ft and under range, 30lb and under, and are far less capable of harming a human than a similarly sized dog.
>t. has owned dogs, cats, snakes, rats, and inverts
Kek
>Pit bulls engage in home invasions more often than any other dog
More a situation where buttholes continuously breeding them intentionally for aggression in the name of pit fighting keep putting them back into the gene pool and thus undermining all attempts at fixing them. We know the gene that makes them snap. We've managed to breed it out of certain litters BUT next thing you know some moron bred that litter with the damaged goods from the street and boom it's right back in. They're just too popular with criminals who want the trait for fighting and protecting meth labs for them to be fixed. There are actually people who very much want them as child eating dangers because they are useful to them like that. I did a genetic study of these things and the intentional sabotage of the genetic pool through continuous reintroduction of the damaged product to this day makes the breed unlikely to get better anytime soon unless a true purge is done on the already compromised specimens. Truly sad to me to see animals turned into this and then kept like this. We've fixed other breeds with this issue but the Pit Bull has too much staying power as a nasty dog for people to not want them to be like this enough to maintain the issue. Also if a Bully (toy version) killed you your a gay.
>first post in this thread
fricking lmao at the dumbass trying to equate pitbull ownership to the right to bear arms
Do you think people should be allowed to keep leopards and boa constrictors because some of them are friendly?
I believe pitbulls are more equivalent to the type of explosive that infamously blew off the fingers of the scientist who invented it. Guns and shit like c4 can't even be compared to them because they have virtually no volatility and have to be operated in very specific ways to function at all.
And even though volatile explosives kill few people in america, they are still extremely dangerous and outlawed to the normgroid population, for good reason.
>boa constrictors
literally confirmed body count of 1, accidentally choked owner because idiot had a freakishly large one around his neck.
Snakes cause fewer deaths in the US per year than being struck by lightning does. And that includes bites from wild venomous snakes, from pet venomous snakes, large constrictors, etc.
Statistically it's a non-issue that's already over-legislated in a lot of parts of the country. Banning all dogs would make more sense, safety-wise.
>Pit bulls are less than 6% of all dogs in the USA
lol
what you did was use strict breed definition to measure prevalence and then used no breed definition on bite statistics
if you use the same definition for both, pit bulls either bite 0 people or are over 60% of dogs. you choose.
You can thank 2000s hip hop making every irresponsible favelado think owning a pitbull was gangsta.
Now the dogs are everywhere and mixed with every breed imaginable.
>When I check pitbull attack stories most of them are ONE pitbull attacking ALONE and the first line is "he's never done this before".
calling bullshit, i've seen the exact opposite.
ah, another:
>Horrific! Stray dogs mauled a 4 year old girl in Bhopal a passerby threw stones at the dogs and chased them away. The child has been hospitalized with severe injuries.
https://twitter.com/Anurag_Dwary/status/1477515009181696001
if you check pitbull attack vids, you'll notice the exact same pattern: People leave the dogs alone in groups of 2 or 3.
I've never once seen a pibble owner claim they were a bad a owner even after their little sweetheart rips a few toddlers asunder. So then it must be a systemic type of bad ownership.
Maybe there should be some level of responsibility required to own an animal with the capability to kill? Maybe like licensing and registration or insurance, like how they do with cars. Imagine how much of a drag dog bites are on the system when they bring in hundreds of thousands of people into the emergency room every year.
>or insurance
this is already a requirement, but most dog owners don't know it because they don't have the insurance. Their landlord does.
I knew a responsible one but he's a drug dealer so idk.
>I don't think which arms is a matter of debate at all.
of course it is because the founding fathers didn't specify which arms you have a right to bear any more than they said which dogs you can own.
>all guns sold in the US are safe enough to be kept loaded without firing while just sitting still
You adding false parameters doesn't change the fact that hundreds of people die every year from gun accidents, And nobody knows how many pets die of gun accidents because nobody cares.
high difficulty dog, similar to huskies. You should NOT own them if you can't manage their quirks.
key problem is that their excitement state turns them into miniature gators, same way small creatures moving fast turn huskies into predators.
Avoiding getting them exited is mostly a matter of tiring them out with exercise, not leaving them alone in pairs or more and praying to god almighty it's not an incest freak in permanent pain from brain damage.
Alternately you can double down on the incest thing and SMASH them into harmlessness
Holy shit, somebody who actually knows.
Didn't expect that.
>Owning a gun is a consitutional right
bearing arms is a constitutional right
which arms is a matter of debate
gun accidents resulting in death are far more common than pit bull accidents resulting in death
You don't get to use some generic label like pit bull and then some specific label like AR-15
if we're comparing pit bulls we're comparing Assault Weapons, because both terms are equally meaningless in the US.
One of my close friends was killed by a drink driver; it was entirely random and unforeseeable on my friends part. Get fricked you logically inconsistent maggot.
You are far more likely to get killed by an alcoholic than a Pitbull .
In terms of guns, plenty of schizo morons are out their who are no smarter than animals.
You are a typical NPC parroting views so formulaic I can't help but wonder if your post was was generated by an AI, you fricking moron.
Bear in mind, the average PB owner has terrible training strategies. A cursory Google search will show you studies on how people raise their dogs and the damage it causes. A massive amount of the harm can be prevented by enforcing licencing and training to own a pb. In the same way that you need to take a class to own a gun.
Would you be opposed to proper licencing? Or do you want them outright killed? If its the former, we can agree. But if you want outright euthanasia of them then you are logically inconsistent to the extreme.
I agree things need to change to decrease dog attacks but people like you jump to overall simplistic "solutions" which serves as evidence you've barely thought about the topic or you are just stupid as frick.
>you need to take a class to own a gun.
lol
again, check out the US before making wrong statements about it.
>licencing and training to own a pb. In the same way that you need to take a class to own a gun.
Kek, euro detected.
>Guns and alcohol don't randomly walk out of the sock drawer and kill children or break free of their owners hands and kill peoples pets.
you should check out US gun stats
>Pitbulls have killed more than drugged up teens with AR15s
also hilariously wrong
Violent breed
Should be put down (genocided) as humanely as possible.
That's a good question OP. Someone should answer it thoughtfully.
Here's a sleeping pit.
God they're so ugly
You should take it out back and shoot it, it's an eyesore
Why would I hurt her?
>never bitten anyone
>contrary shes been bitten
Statistics, yeah.
Cute pup
cute
Cute!
Imagine a world without pitbulls.
Imagine creating that world humanely, patiently, and with care.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/OARzTPHKQEU
Here's a weird concept: All animals are unique creatures with their own personalities.
There are shit people; there are shit dogs. Breed has nothing to do with it. Nature and nurture are real for us as much as it is for the animals we own.
lol no
Ok moron
>Breed has nothing to do with it.
Pitbulls were literally bred to be fighting dogs
You must not know much about selective breeding if you think a few hundred years trumps the decamillennia worth of breeding we've done to dogs as a whole.
If you believe pits are aggressive because of their breed, you're admitting all dogs are aggressive because, since we domesticated them, we've bred them with aggressive traits. Like Hunting, protection, so on and so forth.
End of discussion.
So why are there so many incidents with pits? Media bias or just shit owners, who should be put to death?
Ah, the classic pitfanatic "all dogs are the same and there are no temperamental or behavioural differences between dog breeds whatsoever" bullshit
Different breeds have different tendencies because of selective breeding and humans having intentionally created the breeds for specific tasks. Some dogs were created for hunting, some for herding - pit types were created to be effective at killing other dogs in the fighting pit. If you're trying to deny that you're either delusional or lying, and writing "end of discussion" doesn't change that.
Post your heckin sweetheart
>since we domesticated them, we've bred them with aggressive traits.
No anon, there's big differences with "aggression" and aggression. Lots of hunting dogs aren't bred to go into a mindless killing rage, retrievers for example are known for being able to retrieve the catch without ripping it apart. Protection dogs also are bred for obedience, not just aggression, because they have to reliably obey commands infrared of just attacking any stranger in the yard (postman, relative, family friend etc).
Pit types were bred for "gameness". It's very different.
Seriously why are the people who claim to love these breeds so hell bent to spread lies about it and its history and origins, and pretend that every other breed is the same and just as aggressive and there's no differences between dog breeds at all and breed can't effect temperament? It's pathetic and so delusional. Like sticking fingers in your ears and screaming lalala I can't hear you every dog was bred for aggression just like pits lalala genetics and breeds don't exist lalala
Two hundred years of intense inbreeding turns a generic husky looking thing into a chihuahua you dumb frick
Pitbulls naturally ENJOY biting and their prey drive is so strong it can be triggered by humans. This is a trait we brought back from wolves after spending 40k years getting rid of it.
SIX PERCENT OF DOGS
SEVENTY PERCENT OF FATAL MAULING
BORDER COLLIES: 0 FATAL MAULINGS.
EVERY SHITBULL MUST BE EXTERMINATED
IF I SEE A PITBULL RUN TOWARDS ME I’M SHOOTING IT IN THE GUT, TWICE.
Good choice. That way you have plenty of rounds left for the owner.
Have you seen the average pitbull owner? They’re exclusively women, white dweebs and manlets, and the scrawniest blacksicans to ever exist. You’d only need one shot… of .22.
You are a massive pussy. Should we ban guns too because they cause disproportionate risk? Ban alcohol due to the risk without benefit?
Some people enjoy the breed and that's fine. Not everyone wants to live in a sanitized world where totalitarian morons like yourself put safety and red tape over everything. Yes pitbulls and rotties are more dangerous comparatively to other breeds but in total the chance of one attacking you is still low assuming the training is in order.
You are a massive pussy and I hope the next pb owner you run into is armed. Need less pussy morons in this world. If anyone needs putting down it's you.
>and their prey drive is so strong it can be triggered by humans.
prey drive is different from pitbull biting instinct.
Pitbulls do have prey drive, but it does not necessarily lead them to chomp&pull.
Dogs in general have an exited state I can only describe as pack hostile behaviour. If they hear other dogs giving out specific social signals they get "exited" and become socially unresponsive
It can lead prey behaviour, but it also leads to dog-on-dog fights and ganging up on people, probably getting instinct flashbacks of pack hunting horses in the steppe.
All dogs possess this but their likeliness to enter excitement seems to be 100% determined by their size. While excitement makes them unresponsive, it doesn't make them stupid - Simply walking upon a yorkshire terrier will scare it into sobriety.
Pitbulls seem to be specially susceptible to it, together with other mid-to-large sized dogs like boxers and Rottweilers.
>Dogs in general have an exited state I can only describe as pack hostile behaviour. If they hear other dogs giving out specific social signals they get "exited" and become socially unresponsive
>It can lead prey behaviour, but it also leads to dog-on-dog fights and ganging up on people, probably getting instinct flashbacks of pack hunting horses in the steppe.
To prove i'm not talking out my ass, here are examples:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10435761/Girl-seven-mauled-death-pack-stray-dogs-Russia.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6403671/A-dozen-dogs-deer-chasing-plunge-cliff-Spanish-hunting-accident.html
https://twitter.com/rt_com/status/1487093109406142469
I was a confirmed bad owner and yet pit behaved exemplarily.
Today i'm aware I put the dog in situations that could have ended with someone harmed, Gladfully the only thing ever harmed as a stray sheep that somehow found itself on the beach.
But I simply had no idea dogs could have such strong instinctual reactions. This shit ain't taught in schools.
What do you even mean?
HUH?
You say these things and just have no idea what the words you are saying actually mean. It's like chatting to an ape who's second language is English.
dude like lol what do you even mean haha I totally don't understand xD
Are you moronic?
Americans usually say these types of things. I think they watch too many movies.
Rainbow sparkles. Off back to r eddit
dogs were forcibly inbred into mutants by humans, they are not natural especially pit bulls
Actually a ton of breeds are about as natural as a domesticated animal gets and automatically adapted to human society. The husky, malamute, shiba, akita, jindo, etc are among these. Doggays HATE them and call them low tier, useless etc because they haven’t been forcibly bred into neurotic homosexuals that insistently do their one job over and over again. They’re all multipurpose dogs that can do a lot but only if they like you. Their “jobs” are so generic any dog with legs can do them.
Again doggays hate them.
the german shepherd/malinois is all of those but it actually likes doing a good job for people
>Doggays HATE them and call them low tier
literally no one says this. why do you feel the need to make shit up to support your argument? you can do this without blatantly lying. makes me lose faith in humanity
>Nature and nurture are real for us as much as it is for the animals we own.
This but not in the way you think.
So then we should allow people to have free range african lions or tigers as pets since some might have "friendly" personalities? No, these animals are inherently dangerous and unpredictable.
You are certainly a special kind of moronic though.
>Breed has nothing to do with it.
>Nature and nurture are real
these statements don't work together
if breed is wholely irrelevant then nature isn't a factor and it's all nurture
We are all unique, but it's moronic to say we don't share traits based on the general DNA makeup of our population
For your sake, I hope this is bait. Nature *and* nurture, dick for brains. It's been bred to be aggressive, like dairy cows to be milky, collies to herd, and fruit to grow larger than before.
Sure, not every shitbull is going to maul a child. Not every type 94 nambu pistol is going to lodge a bullet in your leg either. Doesn't mean it should be used or exist.
It's not the dogs fault that it's a breathing mistake anymore than toadlines are deserving of their fate. Sterilizing and painless euthanasia is the humane way to get rid of these things. Why let them live when we cleansed the arguably less dangerous wolves from most of the civilized world? Why let them around children if not for a quasi legal post birth abortion method?
Can someone please explain to me just what the frick these are? I have seen the smashed meme but I am seriously incapable of understanding just what's going on here.
iirc they are pitbulls that have been inbred and selected for these particular fricked up traits. I think the earlier generations almost look dog like but the later ones really are fricking mutant. They can barely stand without too much pain, much less walk. They can't physically reproduce naturally, but since there is a large demand for them, people use the turkey baster. The sperm can be worth thousands of dollars.
Jesus frick thats terrible, even if it is pitbulls being smashed thats just incredibly fricking evil.
In my fantasy world unicorns poop rainbow
t. Frog who let's a scorpion ride on his back across the pond
>Nature and nurture are real for us as much as it is for the animals we own.
Human personality is pretty much set for life by around age 2, and IQ is 80% genetic. Yes, there have been twin studies where they took two twins, put one in a family of the same "economic circumstances" race, and placed another in a white family, and both were equally dumb, despite completely different levels of academic opportunity. With dogs, it's the same. Some dogs are, genetically, more likely to maul children due to how their brains are wired. What's really evil is that shitty liberals like you lie about the breed so other stupid liberals adopt them and expose them to their children, who are innocent and don't have a choice in whether they live in close proximity to a killer animal.
I feel like this entire debacle spanning years is libshitters trying very hard to prove we can change le nature and we have le free-will. When in reality you may be able to make that animal docile sometimes but you'll never be able to seperate that beast inside. All shitbulls are ticking timebombs. They can't help it. Euthanizing is a way to keep kids safe and prevent disaster. This breed should be outlawed.
It's like the feral cat disaster except they're pitbulls and instead of killing all the birds they're killing and maiming kids.
You do realize that your argument could be very easily turned to the opposite side, right?
>I feel like this entire debacle spanning years is libshitters trying very hard to prove we can change le nature and we have le free-will
it's because they know pitbulls are the black people of dogs and the implications
Mostly the later, but a bit of the former.
It also doesn't help that they are so fricking strong.
I love my friend's two pits, although I don't know if I'd be willing to have one.
From what I've seen, he's both careful (hiding them away when kids are around, introducong them to adults slowly, etc) and stric with them, so they are incredibly well behaved and fun dogs.
>Mostly the later, but a bit of the former.
This but the other way around.
What is fun about constantly having to worry about your ugly ass mutant dog killing people especially children? I swear doggays are moronic. The whole point of dog domestication is they can easily live in human society without issue. You know...muh "man's best friend" and all that nonsense. With the ending of bloodsports its clear that fighting breeds cannot live around humans without issue and it's a problem that be dealt with
They aren't spreading lies per say they are simply moronic and truly believe the Disney-Dog myth. I was going to mention gameness but you beat me to it.
Why do you care?
I only take rescue dogs because Africant and the lost dog I took off a method head turnout to be pitbull x dogo he is very very protective extremely game and unnecessarily frightening he has eaten two cats and almost a third he had 1 israelite face and one beggars hand but never been a problem with us his family though he was never very vicious in his attacks they seem very simple type of responses to behavior he is not happy with like the israelite who held his face and tried kissing him but now I'm worried I have an addiction with these large breed game dogs and that I will probably now rescue another and it won't have anywhere near good a genetic and character set this dog is trained to guard the house and hunt moles he enjoys long swims and israelite faces
yo u are autistic
Some pet bulls can be friendly I've heard
they're friendly until they decide to not be out of the blue. The unpredictability is what makes them so dangerous, it lulls some owners into a false sense of security
Rather than a pet bull, perhaps a pet cow?
>they're friendly until they decide to not be out of the blue
You mean, out of the red?
I mean technically he is right
Some of the absolute best dogs I've known have been pits but as a whole I don't advocate for their ownership. Most of them can be pretty sketchy at random.
Under who's authority can it not be both?
Mine. You have to pick one.