One of the most decorated military animals was a pitbull mix. Why does?

One of the most decorated military animals was a pitbull mix…

Why does Wauf still hate the breed?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    tripgay post wrist

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Pitbulls are trash for everything that is not a crime. They were good when there were no other options and mastiffs were expensive, but then we got these cool dogs from germany and belgium. These shitty moron dogs are too dumb to control at all, too cowardly to be good protectors, and too violent and touchy to not kill your kids friends.

    They are not american. They are african american, because their primary purpose is lower class bloodsport gambling.

    Putting the lot of them down only costs ammo. A lot of people would do it for free.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      but muh game! they dont retreat and regroup when they’re being gutted alive! basado!

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    OP is the same pitmommy homosexual who always whines when we have shitbull defense threads on /k/, and equates dangerous dog laws to gun control laws- as if they're even remotely equivalent. Why not just let people have pet suburban lions at that point? Oh wait, the dumbasses whose kids got eaten by their two demon dogs the other day actually referred to their shitbulls as "house lions." Shitbull owners all know their dogs are dangerous, but try to play coy word games and claim they're actually docile. Nobody is falling for their shit anymore. It's time for the Final Solution to the Shitbull Question.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    that moronic mascot never did shit

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      He did more than you.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    stubby was a boston terrier you tard
    not even close to being a pitbull

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >modern boston terrier a decorated war dog
      fricking poo fingered humanzee shut the frick up

    • 1 year ago
      Cock Luster

      >Stubby was described in contemporaneous news items as a Boston Terrier or "American bull terrier"[a] mutt.

      Anyway...
      >The USA admired this breed for qualities that it likened in itself; friendly, brave, hardworking, worthy of respect and they became, the “All American Dog”. During WWI and WWII, Pit Bulls were used as the nation's mascot. Their image of bravery and loyalty was displayed throughout advertisements during wartime.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Way back when, if someone had a pitbull, it was owned by a man, and he trained it with a very heavy hand. These dogs were beaten pretty damn hard for showing anything resembling aggression towards anything. Treat them like that and they go from unhinged lunatic that will suicidally attack anything and everything to afraid to move without permission. They're a very submissive breed when lorded over.

        What's so special about pitbull owners? They're liberals who think every dog is a samoyed and won't accept that genetics can make them dangerous.

        • 1 year ago
          Cock Luster

          I think they were well aware of a pit bulls ability to be aggressive, we just live in an emasculated society
          >we're not looking for trouble, but we're ready for it
          It basically sums up a pit bull

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            That sums up a german shepherd. Sit and watch, nervous. Pitbulls are always looking for trouble. Unless you literally beat them into submission they are hyperactive dogs and if they get hyped up they start mauling.

            >We live in an emasculated society
            It's worse. We live in a society where anti-racism somehow affected dogs. People seem to be way more willing to slap shock collars and even plain idiotic shit like prong collars on GSDs and mastiffs while pitbulls are shilled as family pets because of their conflation with africans.

            • 1 year ago
              Cock Luster

              You're a homosexual

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Sorry your dog is trash that only appeals to ghetto morons betting on dogfights. They've been bred like shit and owned like shit for over 50 years.

                Move on. There are better, smarter dogs for everything. Dogos, mals, etc. Pitbulls are shit.

              • 1 year ago
                Cock Luster

                You move on, from your fixation. Stop watching the news grandma.

              • 1 year ago
                Cock Luster

                Look this little kid has more balls then you, a grown man crying about dog breed laws online

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You move on, from your fixation. Stop watching the news grandma.

                Seethe homie pitbulls are only good for mauling kids and lapdogs

                You probably can’t even handle a malinois

              • 1 year ago
                Cock Luster

                >Pitbulls in the 1800s were called "Nanny dogs"
                You're outrageously gay and low testosterone, threatened existentially by an animal because you're unable to defend your country

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Who are you quoting?

              • 1 year ago
                Cock Luster

                It was a Reddit result which somehow is less gay then you

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                A reddit result of what?

              • 1 year ago
                Cock Luster

                I guess this claim that we were originally raised from infancy by pit bulls
                https://www.adoptapet.com/blog/for-over-100-years-pitbulls-were-our-babysitters/

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This doesn’t act as proof of the nanny dog claim though.

              • 1 year ago
                Cock Luster

                The article has a point though, if you want to keep your family safe you'd have a pitbull and a gun but you just want a mail in ballot and a phone to call the police I guess?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What? Where in the hell did you get that from the link you sent?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >https://www.adoptapet.com/blog/for-over-100-years-pitbulls-were-our-babysitters/

                This article is a crock of shit, it references the ATTA dog temperament test which has been completely debunked, the test only looked at how dogs within a breed responded to human commands. Pit Bull owners love to bring it up to prove Pit Bulls aren't as dangerous as other dogs when the test never put the Pit Bulls in any situations which could trigger aggressiveness, like around other people or other dogs.

                It also references the whole "Pit Bulls jaws don't lock" shit. No one is actually saying Pit Bulls jaws physically lock into place, they're saying they lock onto their prey and don't let go. The Pit Bull people love to take things out of context.

                Just look at how fricking absurd this statement is:

                "The most tolerant, patient, gentle breed of dogs is now embarrassingly portrayed as the most dangerous. It would be funny if the new reputation did not mean 6,000 are put to death every day, by far the highest number of any other breed euthanized."

                >The most tolerant, patient and gentle breed.

                Lmao how fricking delusional do you have to be that the breed that's responsible for the most deaths out of any breed it the most tolerant and gentle breed. Pits make up 6% of dogs yet are responsible for 68% of fatal dog attacks. They're bred for blood sports, they're the most dangerous and viscous breed.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        and after ww2, everyone except blacks forgot they existed because the army learned that german breeds were more intelligent, controllable, and likely to survive. war dogs have to fight shit with hands so letting go instead of sitting there being a target is a valid survival tactic.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Sgt. Stubby (PBUH) was a Boston Terrier, they are half removed from Pits due to their classification as a toy breed. You wouldn't be scared of a French Bulldog (Bostie's half-sibling)

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You know what's funny? Pithomosexuals will literally deflect from maulings and attacks on other pets by saying that pitbulls don't kill THAT many people.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Btw, this psyop of stubby the “pitbull” is ridiculous and 100% exaggerated. The stories of him (a 25 lb dog mind you) wrestling German spies and surviving gas attacks (Brachycephalic breed mind you) are moron tier.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Looks mixed with a Toy-Type Terrier

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >that one video where pittie runs across the parking lot to attach a child out of multiple people
    Kek.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the military both was moronic and is moronic
    even if the u.s wasn't run by communists, it's just a dumb concept for pussies who are too afraid to fight each other to the death

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    because mostly working class to poverty level trash people own them.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    good soldiers make terrible citizens

    either they do not value their own life or they do not value others

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Kill one man you’re a murderer kill hundreds you’re a war hero.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Didnt work out for adolf…

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Great dog for war.
    This doesn't mean that is a good dog to take care of children.
    but if you want to get rid of children...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They were family pets prior to WW2. The most common breed in the US for it I think or one of. Circumstances have changed for them, these modern dogs are abused and the push towards no guns/no dogs/no non-urban land is just a pussification of the population and it's so pathetic you worship that movement. Plus all dog breeds have been ruined by psychotic breeding practises so what are you even referring to when you note historical animals to compare to one down the road and I think you're one of these sick humans that don't look like the old pictures, too.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        it's not abuse, it's breeding. call it genetic abuse? it's not the owner, loving white families still wake up to dead toddlers. it's the breeder.

        >muh dogs have something to do with guns diversion
        dogs are not in the constitution. some of the oldest dog laws in the US pertain to your right to kill dogs, not your right to own them.

        >they were family pets
        they are family pets today...

        violent or not (protip: they were still violent, their owners were just stricter and hit them EXTREMELY HARD and kept them chained up almost all the time - vintage american dog owners had 0 empathy) what some pitbulls were 200 years ago is not even relevant to today. today
        1: a dog that looks a certain *ugly* way is not worth risking a child 30x more than any other dog
        2: it is not the owner, it is the breed. it's only the owner insofar as the owner could have had it locked in a cage or viciously beat it into submission so it would never consider asserting its own will in any way
        3: in the united states, the legal right to kill a dog predates anything resembling the legal right to own one.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >loving white families still wake up to dead toddlers
          1. Why don't Americans have fences
          2. Why is your toddler wandering around in public spaces alone? If not a dog then another human might be the perpetrator
          >dog attacks are up, according to news source
          Which still only puts the total American deaths at 300 over the last 20 years.
          >Fatal dog attacks in the United States cause the deaths of about 30 to 50 people in the US each year
          >Lawnmower accidents cause 85,000 injuries a year in the US, including 70 fatalities
          >Lightning kills about 20 people each year in the United States
          You are an overemotional wreck who's swayed by the tides of media

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >it's nothing! muh heckin doggo furbaby! actually you are in the wrong! you should base your life around aggressive dogs!
            50 less dead people a year is an improvement and I really do not view dogs as a human right. Especially not dogs bred from inception to present for killing animals dogs normally do not fight to kill. As we can see, breeding a dog to fight dogs to the death, with consistency, results in a dog that attacks people.

            >ITS NOTHING STOP CARING
            It's something, quite a bit more something than lawnmowers, because the victims are totally unwilling and unaware of the danger especially with propagandists like you running around, and more something than lightning, because it's like if you could just not own a lightning cloud.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >I really do not view dogs as a human right
              What do you consider a human right in relation to freedom and responsibility? You could say a dog comes under the right to bear arms and
              >dogs normally do not fight to kill
              they are domesticated wolves moron

              Go mow your lawn

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Not him but your rights are outlined in the consitution and living things are not arms you fricking moron. arms are guns, swords, knives, grenades, rocket launchers, spears. the founding fathers lived to see privately owned warships with gatling guns and cannons. they never added dogs to the constitution.

                >domesticated wolves do not fight to kill
                that is why they are called domesticated moron. a wolf will fight everything outside its pack to kill it. when we killed those shitty animals we got dogs. dogs don't kill other dogs. dogs don't kill people. when they do, WE PUT THEM DOWN. understand?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Devils advocate here. Cotus ruled that dogs can be deemed a dangerous weapon.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I want a tank next

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Lighting and lawnmowers aren't things people smugly bring around my kids and brag about how peaceful they are

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              As a parent you have every opportunity to screen your kids playmates to remove unleashed pitbulls

              Anyway, I agree with you
              In keeping with OP's theme
              >"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
              >armament. noun
              >military weapons and equipment
              It's a Constitutional right to keep attack animals

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The founding fathers never once said a word about dogs but at the time attack dogs were a rarity (most dogs were for hunting) and their owners treated them like garbage, because they were disposable garbage.

                They were not pets. They were beaten into submission and kept on a chain.

                If you want to liken dogs to arms then this is how you have to treat pitbulls. Like loaded guns. You beat them, savagely, into submission, and start treating them like loaded guns. This also means that if you remove the muzzle from your pitbull it is the same as waving a gun around and any other armed man has the right to shoot you and your dog in self defense. They no longer have any rights like other animals, they are objects, they have one purpose, and no one will ever treat them like a dog. They are a weapon. Does this compromise make you happy?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                im ok with this

                taking the muzzle off your pitbull is like taking your gun out of the holster
                dropping the leash is like putting your finger on the trigger

                your dog gets shot, you're held at gunpoint, and arrested for the same crime someone would be if they did that with a gun. so, having a pitbull around children is like pointing a gun at children and prosecuted severely. if someone takes a pitbull to the dog park, their dog is shot and they are arrested like they walked into the dog park and shouldered a rifle.

                are attack dogs still arms guys?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                im ok with this

                taking the muzzle off your pitbull is like taking your gun out of the holster
                dropping the leash is like putting your finger on the trigger

                your dog gets shot, you're held at gunpoint, and arrested for the same crime someone would be if they did that with a gun. so, having a pitbull around children is like pointing a gun at children and prosecuted severely. if someone takes a pitbull to the dog park, their dog is shot and they are arrested like they walked into the dog park and shouldered a rifle.

                are attack dogs still arms guys?

                >MUZZLE PITS
                Based take on Wauf. No way to enforce it without giving the feds more power. Also, daily reminder that BSL is unproven in reducing attacks.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >ban pitbulls
                >every single pitbull owner:
                >do i have a pitbull? no...
                >he's a staffordshire mix
                >he's a mastiff lab mix
                >he's a rhodesian ridgeback lab mix
                >he's a bulldog terrier mix
                >number of pitbulls remains effectively constant
                >BSL doesn't work lol!
                Plus there are so many shitty breeds recognized by some club or another that you would have a hard time getting every single one into law without creating the department of dangerous dogs.

                >No way to enforce it without giving the feds more power
                Put a gun in every man's pants and remind everyone daily that shitbulls are dangerous.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Bulldog Terrier mix
                Kek!

                >Remind people daily
                Honestly, there are so many pit mixes in my community, and people who run shit with pits that it seems inefficient. I convince a few people but the majority is “they get a bad rap”.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                im ok with this

                taking the muzzle off your pitbull is like taking your gun out of the holster
                dropping the leash is like putting your finger on the trigger

                your dog gets shot, you're held at gunpoint, and arrested for the same crime someone would be if they did that with a gun. so, having a pitbull around children is like pointing a gun at children and prosecuted severely. if someone takes a pitbull to the dog park, their dog is shot and they are arrested like they walked into the dog park and shouldered a rifle.

                are attack dogs still arms guys?

                This explains a lot.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >They were family pets prior to WW2.

        This is a bullshit lie that's been heavily pushed by pro Pit Bull lobbyists, they've been trying to rebrand Pit Bulls as family dogs or "nanny dogs" for the past 2 decades to get them out of kill shelters. Pit Bulls were never known as family dogs, they were bred specifically to be fighting dogs. The idea that a dog bred for blood sports should be kept around children as a family dog is fricking absurd. Just look what happened in Memphis last week. That was the result of idiots pushing the idea that Pits are family dogs.

        • 1 year ago
          Cock Lover

          >Pit Bulls were never known as family dogs
          They're the most family orientated of almost all effective guard dogs

          >https://www.adoptapet.com/blog/for-over-100-years-pitbulls-were-our-babysitters/

          This article is a crock of shit, it references the ATTA dog temperament test which has been completely debunked, the test only looked at how dogs within a breed responded to human commands. Pit Bull owners love to bring it up to prove Pit Bulls aren't as dangerous as other dogs when the test never put the Pit Bulls in any situations which could trigger aggressiveness, like around other people or other dogs.

          It also references the whole "Pit Bulls jaws don't lock" shit. No one is actually saying Pit Bulls jaws physically lock into place, they're saying they lock onto their prey and don't let go. The Pit Bull people love to take things out of context.

          Just look at how fricking absurd this statement is:

          "The most tolerant, patient, gentle breed of dogs is now embarrassingly portrayed as the most dangerous. It would be funny if the new reputation did not mean 6,000 are put to death every day, by far the highest number of any other breed euthanized."

          >The most tolerant, patient and gentle breed.

          Lmao how fricking delusional do you have to be that the breed that's responsible for the most deaths out of any breed it the most tolerant and gentle breed. Pits make up 6% of dogs yet are responsible for 68% of fatal dog attacks. They're bred for blood sports, they're the most dangerous and viscous breed.

          Humans kill people, should we ban them?
          >In 2019, 608 child passengers age 12 and younger died in motor vehicle crashes,1 and more than 91,000 were injured
          Do you want to ban cars next?

          Yes, I agree they are dangerous, so are people, so is life. I still want a pit bull. It's my right as a responsible owner to have a family pet that is treated and trained well. You're allowed to drive your car and you have shit for brains. That's unfair.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >They're the most family orientated of almost all effective guard dogs
            Except for the fact that at their core they're not even guard dogs, they're fighting dogs that were bred specifically for blood sports. Also show me some actual evidence that Pit Bulls are family dogs that isn't coming from some highly biased Pro-Pit Bull website like the one in my comment. I don't see why a Pit Bull would be anymore family oriented than a German Shepherd.

            >Humans kill people, should we ban them?
            I don't necessarily think we should completely ban them, but we should require licenses to own them. To get the license you should have to prove you have a fence that can keep the dog, that you won't let the dog off the leash in public, and that you take full responsibility for any damage your dog inflicts on someone. Like if your Pit Bull bites someone you would receive an assault charge to the equivalent that it was your fault. That would definitely scare a lot of Pit owners into being much more responsible with their dogs. I also don't think they should be kept in houses with young kids, you just never know when they could snap like what happened in Memphis.

            I also think breeding of them should be banned and pretty strictly enforced, that would mean there's not all these Pit Bulls ending up in shelters that end up being pushed onto inexperienced owners or put down. The core issue is the over-breeding of these dogs. The whole reason they're being touted as "nanny dogs" by the Pit Bull lobby is to convince families to adopt them to get them out of kill shelters. If they weren't being bred it wouldn't be an issue.

            Also cars serve a vital purpose to society, Pit Bulls serve zero purpose, they're fighting dogs.

            • 1 year ago
              Cock Lover

              homosexuals like you are why taxes are so high

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                And homosexuals like you are why shelters are crowded with pitbulls that have to be put down. You don't actually care about any dogs. Not pitbull attack victims, and not even pitbulls themselves. Otherwise you'd want to take action against pitbull overpopulation and irresponsible breeding & ownership.

              • 1 year ago
                Cock Lover

                Right... Go start a government department, tax leach

              • 1 year ago
                Cock Lover

                >Hi we're going to need $10,000,000 in federal funding because there's an angry gay man here writing posts on Wauf

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you want to have sex with that anon so bad it isn’t even funny

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *