One of the most decorated military animals was a pitbull mix…
Why does Wauf still hate the breed?
One of the most decorated military animals was a pitbull mix. Why does?
One of the most decorated military animals was a pitbull mix…
Why does Wauf still hate the breed?
tripfag post wrist
Pitbulls are trash for everything that is not a crime. They were good when there were no other options and mastiffs were expensive, but then we got these cool dogs from germany and belgium. These shitty retard dogs are too dumb to control at all, too cowardly to be good protectors, and too violent and touchy to not kill your kids friends.
They are not american. They are african american, because their primary purpose is lower class bloodsport gambling.
Putting the lot of them down only costs ammo. A lot of people would do it for free.
but muh game! they dont retreat and regroup when they’re being gutted alive! basado!
OP is the same pitmommy gay who always whines when we have shitbull defense threads on Wauf, and equates dangerous dog laws to gun control laws- as if they're even remotely equivalent. Why not just let people have pet suburban lions at that point? Oh wait, the dumbasses whose kids got eaten by their two demon dogs the other day actually referred to their shitbulls as "house lions." Shitbull owners all know their dogs are dangerous, but try to play coy word games and claim they're actually docile. Nobody is falling for their shit anymore. It's time for the Final Solution to the Shitbull Question.
that retarded mascot never did shit
He did more than you.
stubby was a boston terrier you tard
not even close to being a pitbull
>modern boston terrier a decorated war dog
fucking poo fingered humanzee shut the fuck up
>Stubby was described in contemporaneous news items as a Boston Terrier or "American bull terrier"[a] mutt.
Anyway...
>The USA admired this breed for qualities that it likened in itself; friendly, brave, hardworking, worthy of respect and they became, the “All American Dog”. During WWI and WWII, Pit Bulls were used as the nation's mascot. Their image of bravery and loyalty was displayed throughout advertisements during wartime.
Way back when, if someone had a pitbull, it was owned by a man, and he trained it with a very heavy hand. These dogs were beaten pretty damn hard for showing anything resembling aggression towards anything. Treat them like that and they go from unhinged lunatic that will suicidally attack anything and everything to afraid to move without permission. They're a very submissive breed when lorded over.
What's so special about pitbull owners? They're liberals who think every dog is a samoyed and won't accept that genetics can make them dangerous.
I think they were well aware of a pit bulls ability to be aggressive, we just live in an emasculated society
>we're not looking for trouble, but we're ready for it
It basically sums up a pit bull
That sums up a german shepherd. Sit and watch, nervous. Pitbulls are always looking for trouble. Unless you literally beat them into submission they are hyperactive dogs and if they get hyped up they start mauling.
>We live in an emasculated society
It's worse. We live in a society where anti-racism somehow affected dogs. People seem to be way more willing to slap shock collars and even plain idiotic shit like prong collars on GSDs and mastiffs while pitbulls are shilled as family pets because of their conflation with africans.
You're a gay
Sorry your dog is trash that only appeals to ghetto retards betting on dogfights. They've been bred like shit and owned like shit for over 50 years.
Move on. There are better, smarter dogs for everything. Dogos, mals, etc. Pitbulls are shit.
You move on, from your fixation. Stop watching the news grandma.
Look this little kid has more balls then you, a grown man crying about dog breed laws online
Seethe homie pitbulls are only good for mauling kids and lapdogs
You probably can’t even handle a malinois
>Pitbulls in the 1800s were called "Nanny dogs"
You're outrageously gay and low testosterone, threatened existentially by an animal because you're unable to defend your country
Who are you quoting?
It was a Reddit result which somehow is less gay then you
A reddit result of what?
I guess this claim that we were originally raised from infancy by pit bulls
https://www.adoptapet.com/blog/for-over-100-years-pitbulls-were-our-babysitters/
This doesn’t act as proof of the nanny dog claim though.
The article has a point though, if you want to keep your family safe you'd have a pitbull and a gun but you just want a mail in ballot and a phone to call the police I guess?
What? Where in the hell did you get that from the link you sent?
>https://www.adoptapet.com/blog/for-over-100-years-pitbulls-were-our-babysitters/
This article is a crock of shit, it references the ATTA dog temperament test which has been completely debunked, the test only looked at how dogs within a breed responded to human commands. Pit Bull owners love to bring it up to prove Pit Bulls aren't as dangerous as other dogs when the test never put the Pit Bulls in any situations which could trigger aggressiveness, like around other people or other dogs.
It also references the whole "Pit Bulls jaws don't lock" shit. No one is actually saying Pit Bulls jaws physically lock into place, they're saying they lock onto their prey and don't let go. The Pit Bull people love to take things out of context.
Just look at how fucking absurd this statement is:
"The most tolerant, patient, gentle breed of dogs is now embarrassingly portrayed as the most dangerous. It would be funny if the new reputation did not mean 6,000 are put to death every day, by far the highest number of any other breed euthanized."
>The most tolerant, patient and gentle breed.
Lmao how fucking delusional do you have to be that the breed that's responsible for the most deaths out of any breed it the most tolerant and gentle breed. Pits make up 6% of dogs yet are responsible for 68% of fatal dog attacks. They're bred for blood sports, they're the most dangerous and viscous breed.
and after ww2, everyone except blacks forgot they existed because the army learned that german breeds were more intelligent, controllable, and likely to survive. war dogs have to fight shit with hands so letting go instead of sitting there being a target is a valid survival tactic.
Sgt. Stubby (PBUH) was a Boston Terrier, they are half removed from Pits due to their classification as a toy breed. You wouldn't be scared of a French Bulldog (Bostie's half-sibling)
You know what's funny? Pitgays will literally deflect from maulings and attacks on other pets by saying that pitbulls don't kill THAT many people.
Btw, this psyop of stubby the “pitbull” is ridiculous and 100% exaggerated. The stories of him (a 25 lb dog mind you) wrestling German spies and surviving gas attacks (Brachycephalic breed mind you) are retard tier.
Looks mixed with a Toy-Type Terrier
>that one video where pittie runs across the parking lot to attach a child out of multiple people
Kek.
the military both was retarded and is retarded
even if the u.s wasn't run by communists, it's just a dumb concept for pussies who are too afraid to fight each other to the death
because mostly working class to poverty level trash people own them.
good soldiers make terrible citizens
either they do not value their own life or they do not value others
Kill one man you’re a murderer kill hundreds you’re a war hero.
Didnt work out for adolf…
Great dog for war.
This doesn't mean that is a good dog to take care of children.
but if you want to get rid of children...
They were family pets prior to WW2. The most common breed in the US for it I think or one of. Circumstances have changed for them, these modern dogs are abused and the push towards no guns/no dogs/no non-urban land is just a pussification of the population and it's so pathetic you worship that movement. Plus all dog breeds have been ruined by psychotic breeding practises so what are you even referring to when you note historical animals to compare to one down the road and I think you're one of these sick humans that don't look like the old pictures, too.
it's not abuse, it's breeding. call it genetic abuse? it's not the owner, loving white families still wake up to dead toddlers. it's the breeder.
>muh dogs have something to do with guns diversion
dogs are not in the constitution. some of the oldest dog laws in the US pertain to your right to kill dogs, not your right to own them.
>they were family pets
they are family pets today...
violent or not (protip: they were still violent, their owners were just stricter and hit them EXTREMELY HARD and kept them chained up almost all the time - vintage american dog owners had 0 empathy) what some pitbulls were 200 years ago is not even relevant to today. today
1: a dog that looks a certain *ugly* way is not worth risking a child 30x more than any other dog
2: it is not the owner, it is the breed. it's only the owner insofar as the owner could have had it locked in a cage or viciously beat it into submission so it would never consider asserting its own will in any way
3: in the united states, the legal right to kill a dog predates anything resembling the legal right to own one.
>loving white families still wake up to dead toddlers
1. Why don't Americans have fences
2. Why is your toddler wandering around in public spaces alone? If not a dog then another human might be the perpetrator
>dog attacks are up, according to news source
Which still only puts the total American deaths at 300 over the last 20 years.
>Fatal dog attacks in the United States cause the deaths of about 30 to 50 people in the US each year
>Lawnmower accidents cause 85,000 injuries a year in the US, including 70 fatalities
>Lightning kills about 20 people each year in the United States
You are an overemotional wreck who's swayed by the tides of media
>it's nothing! muh heckin doggo furbaby! actually you are in the wrong! you should base your life around aggressive dogs!
50 less dead people a year is an improvement and I really do not view dogs as a human right. Especially not dogs bred from inception to present for killing animals dogs normally do not fight to kill. As we can see, breeding a dog to fight dogs to the death, with consistency, results in a dog that attacks people.
>ITS NOTHING STOP CARING
It's something, quite a bit more something than lawnmowers, because the victims are totally unwilling and unaware of the danger especially with propagandists like you running around, and more something than lightning, because it's like if you could just not own a lightning cloud.
>I really do not view dogs as a human right
What do you consider a human right in relation to freedom and responsibility? You could say a dog comes under the right to bear arms and
>dogs normally do not fight to kill
they are domesticated wolves retard
Go mow your lawn
Not him but your rights are outlined in the consitution and living things are not arms you fucking retard. arms are guns, swords, knives, grenades, rocket launchers, spears. the founding fathers lived to see privately owned warships with gatling guns and cannons. they never added dogs to the constitution.
>domesticated wolves do not fight to kill
that is why they are called domesticated retard. a wolf will fight everything outside its pack to kill it. when we killed those shitty animals we got dogs. dogs don't kill other dogs. dogs don't kill people. when they do, WE PUT THEM DOWN. understand?
Devils advocate here. Cotus ruled that dogs can be deemed a dangerous weapon.
I want a tank next
Lighting and lawnmowers aren't things people smugly bring around my kids and brag about how peaceful they are
As a parent you have every opportunity to screen your kids playmates to remove unleashed pitbulls
Anyway, I agree with you
In keeping with OP's theme
>"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
>armament. noun
>military weapons and equipment
It's a Constitutional right to keep attack animals
The founding fathers never once said a word about dogs but at the time attack dogs were a rarity (most dogs were for hunting) and their owners treated them like garbage, because they were disposable garbage.
They were not pets. They were beaten into submission and kept on a chain.
If you want to liken dogs to arms then this is how you have to treat pitbulls. Like loaded guns. You beat them, savagely, into submission, and start treating them like loaded guns. This also means that if you remove the muzzle from your pitbull it is the same as waving a gun around and any other armed man has the right to shoot you and your dog in self defense. They no longer have any rights like other animals, they are objects, they have one purpose, and no one will ever treat them like a dog. They are a weapon. Does this compromise make you happy?
im ok with this
taking the muzzle off your pitbull is like taking your gun out of the holster
dropping the leash is like putting your finger on the trigger
your dog gets shot, you're held at gunpoint, and arrested for the same crime someone would be if they did that with a gun. so, having a pitbull around children is like pointing a gun at children and prosecuted severely. if someone takes a pitbull to the dog park, their dog is shot and they are arrested like they walked into the dog park and shouldered a rifle.
are attack dogs still arms guys?
>MUZZLE PITS
Based take on Wauf. No way to enforce it without giving the feds more power. Also, daily reminder that BSL is unproven in reducing attacks.
>ban pitbulls
>every single pitbull owner:
>do i have a pitbull? no...
>he's a staffordshire mix
>he's a mastiff lab mix
>he's a rhodesian ridgeback lab mix
>he's a bulldog terrier mix
>number of pitbulls remains effectively constant
>BSL doesn't work lol!
Plus there are so many shitty breeds recognized by some club or another that you would have a hard time getting every single one into law without creating the department of dangerous dogs.
>No way to enforce it without giving the feds more power
Put a gun in every man's pants and remind everyone daily that shitbulls are dangerous.
>Bulldog Terrier mix
Kek!
>Remind people daily
Honestly, there are so many pit mixes in my community, and people who run shit with pits that it seems inefficient. I convince a few people but the majority is “they get a bad rap”.
This explains a lot.
>They were family pets prior to WW2.
This is a bullshit lie that's been heavily pushed by pro Pit Bull lobbyists, they've been trying to rebrand Pit Bulls as family dogs or "nanny dogs" for the past 2 decades to get them out of kill shelters. Pit Bulls were never known as family dogs, they were bred specifically to be fighting dogs. The idea that a dog bred for blood sports should be kept around children as a family dog is fucking absurd. Just look what happened in Memphis last week. That was the result of idiots pushing the idea that Pits are family dogs.
>Pit Bulls were never known as family dogs
They're the most family orientated of almost all effective guard dogs
Humans kill people, should we ban them?
>In 2019, 608 child passengers age 12 and younger died in motor vehicle crashes,1 and more than 91,000 were injured
Do you want to ban cars next?
Yes, I agree they are dangerous, so are people, so is life. I still want a pit bull. It's my right as a responsible owner to have a family pet that is treated and trained well. You're allowed to drive your car and you have shit for brains. That's unfair.
>They're the most family orientated of almost all effective guard dogs
Except for the fact that at their core they're not even guard dogs, they're fighting dogs that were bred specifically for blood sports. Also show me some actual evidence that Pit Bulls are family dogs that isn't coming from some highly biased Pro-Pit Bull website like the one in my comment. I don't see why a Pit Bull would be anymore family oriented than a German Shepherd.
>Humans kill people, should we ban them?
I don't necessarily think we should completely ban them, but we should require licenses to own them. To get the license you should have to prove you have a fence that can keep the dog, that you won't let the dog off the leash in public, and that you take full responsibility for any damage your dog inflicts on someone. Like if your Pit Bull bites someone you would receive an assault charge to the equivalent that it was your fault. That would definitely scare a lot of Pit owners into being much more responsible with their dogs. I also don't think they should be kept in houses with young kids, you just never know when they could snap like what happened in Memphis.
I also think breeding of them should be banned and pretty strictly enforced, that would mean there's not all these Pit Bulls ending up in shelters that end up being pushed onto inexperienced owners or put down. The core issue is the over-breeding of these dogs. The whole reason they're being touted as "nanny dogs" by the Pit Bull lobby is to convince families to adopt them to get them out of kill shelters. If they weren't being bred it wouldn't be an issue.
Also cars serve a vital purpose to society, Pit Bulls serve zero purpose, they're fighting dogs.
gays like you are why taxes are so high
And gays like you are why shelters are crowded with pitbulls that have to be put down. You don't actually care about any dogs. Not pitbull attack victims, and not even pitbulls themselves. Otherwise you'd want to take action against pitbull overpopulation and irresponsible breeding & ownership.
Right... Go start a government department, tax leach
>Hi we're going to need $10,000,000 in federal funding because there's an angry gay man here writing posts on Wauf
you want to have sex with that anon so bad it isn’t even funny