Lambeosaurus lambei or Tenontosaurus tilletti Posted on July 31, 2022 by Anonymous Which one of these two do you prefer? No questions, just comment to vote...
Well thanks for votes everyone. Just to kill two birds with one stone in round two which one of these two do you prefer, Lambeosaurus lambei or Parasaurolophus walkeri?
Para for me.
Parasaurolophus because it has a trumpet.
I don't even know what this schizo crossfire was about. You can't have a dinosaur thread on /a/ without them I guess.
>I don't even know what this schizo crossfire was about
like talking to a bunch of rocks around here.
if we brains were matches we couldn't light a candle up in this board.
Are you the divorcee?
yelling at tards on the internet?
is that how people socialize where you're from?
that's all Wauf is, but it's not social.
why do you think he posts here?
anywhere else would ban him in a heartbeat for being a retard without a handler in public
>If you write another ragepost it just shows you’re not all that smart.
You aren't capable of recognizing rage or intelligence.
>everything anyone says is true unless you can disprove it!
welcome to the retard ranch.
you feel like if your wrong statements are worth disagreeing with they're of equal worth as right statements.
and thus that you're of equal worth as those who make right statements.
neither is true.
I cannot make you smart enough to understand a concept.
I can make you knowledgeable, but I cannot make you smart. I can feed you information all day, but I cannot make you more intelligent.
nobody can. You're a fucking useless dumb ape and that can't be fixed. This is not an insult, it's not your fault you're stupid. You can't help it and it in no way reflects badly on your character.
you're an asshole, and that's an insult, but perhaps you'll grow out of that one day.
Probably not, but it's up to you.
true. A refutation requires all parties to understand it, and I cannot make you understand anything. So I cannot refute anything.
no more than I can prove to a blind person that the sky is blue.
that is why I don't try. I cannot make you smarter, I can only bitch about how dumb you are and how you being dumb is chasing away anyone smarter than you.
or do you want me to refute your troglodyte views of science funding?
go fuck yourself, you stupid monkey.
If I formulate a refutation I will publish it, not direct it at you.
for example I might point out that stepping on someone's body part doesn't usually cause it to get infected and fall off, and if it did, the whole thing will fall off rather than just a chunk in the shape of a T. rex mouth.
this is beyond your capacity to understand, let alone dispute, so I probably wouldn't bother supporting it here. Nor presumably will anyone actually publish it because it should be obvious.
>Not an argument.
why would I argue with a dirty chimp? why would anyone argue with you? You go on being stupid and wrong and I'll go on lamenting your presence on the planet and on this board.
you are basically a chimp with words and it bothers me not just that you're alive, but that you're also benefitting from the results of the science you misunderstand completely.
your parents never should have had children, and having had children, never should have allowed you to get on the internet. You are painfully stupid.
Not even a T. rex would take on an adult
Also they're numerous enough that we have fossil evidence of their spine ridges.
>Not even a T. rex would take on an adult
>we literally have evidence that a T. rex bit an adult
Yes and the tail healed and the Edmonto survived. Conclusion: the Tyrannosaurus died and lost the death match.
They're now saying the tail was probably just stepped on by another Edmontosaurus, and not bitten.
>all scientists are the same person
>all scientists agree with each other
It hurts me to see you being so dumb
>sentence's context cluse obviously point to 'they' as in some people, instead of 'they' as in "everyone unanimously agrees"
ESL, or extremely autistic? either way, why seethe this hard over literally nothing?
>why seethe this hard over literally nothing?
It bothers me when people are so dumb they see science as a monolith, all scientists in agreement, and the latest science as authoritative over older.
these are the hallmarks of the sub 130 IQ, and a fair number of 130+ IQ's, and it's distressing to share my subspecies and my favorite board with so many intellectual potatoes.
Nobody's done that here. I can't help that you chimped out over misinterpreting what my post said.
your post implies that the "they" saying X have the same or greater weight, number, or authority than the "they" saying NOT X.
or that "they" are the same people.
either way, you're an idiot. Painfully dumb.
You the divorcee?
>edmontosaurus tail injury has teeth marks in it that match the texture and proportions of tyrannosaurus teeth
>is a semi-circle that matches the shape and size of a tyrannosaur's muzzle
>UH ACTUALLY IT WAS JUST A FRIENDLY FIRE ACCIDENT, THIS 18 FOOT HIGH TAILBONE JUST SO HAPPENED TO BE STEPPED ON BY ANOTHER EDMONTOSAURUS!
was Jack Horner behind this?
>The animals was incapable of sitting/laying down
The times I've seen Ken Carpenter pull out the tooth "slides in just perfectly" argument, he's put it in the caudal vertebrae at different angles. I'm not pulling a Horner and saying they didn't hunt.
So how exactly did it defend itself from rex? The only way I can see is bucking or maybe getting on its hind legs and hoof punching.
how do zebras defend themselves from lions?
They have more babbies than the lions can eat.
Lambeosaurus because fancy hat!
The largest one
Hard to decide. If I had to pick right now, Lambeosaurus. I dig it when dinosaurs have weird feat, and horse hooved duckbills are high on that list.
>barely larger than the average cow
>boring crestless Iguanodontoid
>always being eaten by Deinonychus
>biggest hadrosaur ever, even bigger than T. rex
>flamboyant chad-like crest that gives its name to an entire clade of Chadrosaurids - Lambeosaurines
>has never once been depicted as prey for a carnivorous animal
My vote is Lambeosaurus, no contest
>Biggest hadrosaur ever, even bigger than T. rex
I believe you're thinking of Shantungosaurus, that bastard is basically the largest non-sauropod Dinosaur...
believe it or not, Edmontosaurus is actually a LOT bigger than previously thought and is now bigger than Shantungosaurus.
Edmonto could reach around the size of apatosaurus. With the largest edmonto specimens like X-rex reaching 18-20 tons.
all this should tell you is that Shantungosaurus and Apatosaurus are also bigger than you think
Is this based on any actual new finds or just another instance in the long history of paleontologists not knowing how to measure?
This guy gets it.
>This guy gets it.
I think it's because we're dealing with literal children that only care which dinosaur was biggest without realizing that dinosaurs probably never stopped growing and that fossils aren't likely to preserve the biggest individuals of any species.
But kids and idiots can be cute, so whatever.
>always being eaten by Deinonychus
Why did they do this?
adults with dinosaur preferences need psychiatric help
I didn't ask for your opinion on Dinosaur preferences, I asked for your vote...
>I asked for your vote...
that's dumb and childish.
Lambeosaurus. It has a cool crest.
Lambeosaurus for me. It's bigger and has a cooler crest.