ITT: cruel breeds that need to die off

People need to stop specifically breeding animals with mutations that affect them negatively, It's retarded and cruel and so are the people buying them

Dogs are welcome in this thread too btw

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    But the cat can see the Path

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous
  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    SQUISHED and SQUASHED

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Miyamoto is a dog breader what a sick cunt.

    You knew had to be hiding some dark secret. I wonder how man unwanted puppies still covered in dog placenta he drowned or straight up murdered and threw in the trash. BING BING WAHOOO

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Huh?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        the guy that made super mario breeds dogs

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't munchkins one of the healthier "deformed" breeds? the legs are shorter, but they're still formed correctly, aren't they?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Longhorn is loooooooong!

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >let's breed horses to be twice as big
    >let's also make their legs longer and thinner
    >there is zero chance this could end badly for them!

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is literally what women are doing to men.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >let's breed men to be twice as big
        >let's also make their legs longer and thinner
        >there is zero chance this could end badly for them!

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          At this point, the only humane option is to put it down.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/YuXSQUi.jpg

        >let's breed men to be twice as big
        >let's also make their legs longer and thinner
        >there is zero chance this could end badly for them!

        Manlet cope (still true but that's unlikely to happen)

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why would they want to give them thinner legs?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Why would they want to give them thinner legs?
        So they can move them faster. Here's what an extinct horse species with comparable size looked like.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      At this point, the only humane option is to put it down.

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I agree every cat breed / cat should die out

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      People who dislike cats have no soul

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Other way around. People cats dislike have no souls. People who dislike cats have had an unfortunate run in with the smug retarded subhumans who call themselves cat owners.

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    you hate cruel breeds because they expose the hypocrisy of pet owning

    animals are slaves to humans and you are a slave owner
    >but I'm nice to my slaves
    the cope of someone blind to the evil they perpetuate

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      You suggest we stop owning animals I guess.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      You are also a slave. You have never been free, once in your life. If you figure being wild is better and being born into the rules and regulations of society (you can only go here now and then, you can't do that, you eat this but not that...) "slavery" then you are free to cut yourself off and live in the woods. No human help. None. After all you and a domestic dog are about equally "domesticated" in how you are more gracile and less twitchy than your wild ancestors so you should make an excellent test subject for this "dogs are slaves" theory.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        wild animals are slaves to the mindless cruelty of nature

        imagine having even a little sentience and having your life ended terribly because a borderline robotic snakes programming said
        >#start
        >if [thing == moving] envenomate
        >goto start

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >you are free to cut yourself off and live in the woods.
        That's illegal.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >you are free to cut yourself off and live in the woods.
        Actually multiple people have done exactly this and been arrested for it
        All wilderness not private property is considered government property

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Christian morality argument
      into the trash it goes

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    N-no, it can't be... i-is that cat...SMASHED AND SLAMMED!?!?1!1?

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    We should breed for function and behaviour, those "beauty standards" only make things worse and worse and we probably went past a point of no return.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >We should breed for function and behaviour
      Pitbulls and other breeds were on the function thing, too bad it was the wrong function, I still wonder if there is a way to save the original pug gene to fix those poor blobs of skin.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Well of course if you go for a shitty function and behaviour you will have shitty animals.
        However look what's happening with toadline, one again bred for appearance. Not that it's a bad thing if it leads to pits disappearing...

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >We should breed for function and behaviour
      Pitbulls and other breeds were on the function thing, too bad it was the wrong function, I still wonder if there is a way to save the original pug gene to fix those poor blobs of skin.

      Function at what cost? A lot of functional breeds are deformed and unhealthy because they don’t need to live very long or run very far etc like a wild animal would. They just need to be mentally ill in the right way during their prime and produce a lot of puppies that are the same way.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I guess for function people may think function like police dogs and the like.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      No we should invest in retrovirses s we could fix them instead

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The vast majority of dogs. If it doesnt look and act more or less like a slight variation on its regions dingo/wild dog it’s fucked up at least a little and would benefit from looking more natural. And that’s before going into all the eye, joint, brain, and skin disorders and hereditary cancer rates that are ONLY prolific because of all the inbreeding done to “fix” and preserve largely aesthetic breed specific traits.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Beagles are the exception. Longer amd healthier lives through breeding.
      Dumb as shit though.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Beagles aren't bread?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          No they're dogs

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Oh shit, I need to make a call.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Beagles are the smartest dogs.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. Most dog breeds are a complete dysgenic abomination and should be humanely extinguished and people owning/breeding them referred to therapists.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *