>It's an asexual half frog mutant born in a tube. >paleotards still seethe about the collar

>It's an asexual half frog mutant born in a tube
>paleotards still seethe about the collar
It's fiction, deal with it already

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's fiction that popularizes a false misguided impression of how things were among the general populace. That's what the problem always has been. Then these myths get further ingrained into pop culture and get put into subsequemt works like the ARK game, contributing to raising the populace's overall level of ignorance.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The ARK games are clearly not concerned with portraying anything in any reasonable light however lol

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I always thought it was funny how much they seethe over the frill because there’s no evidence of Dilophosaurus having one but at the same time they will also draw dinosaurs covered in fleshy growths and turkey wattles

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >there’s no evidence of Dilophosaurus having one
      modern lizards and birds having frills is evidence of any dinosaur having one.

      it's just not strong evidence.

      but then most of what we "know" about dinosaur appearance and behavior comes from similarly weak evidence. We just assume they were similar to modern animals of similar niches because evolution tends to do the same things over and over and over and over.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't think it's the palaeoartists who are the ones seething about the dilo-frill.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Helpful tip for the future: Any time you come across this "people say this but they also say this" conundrum, stop and realize that you're almost certainly describing two different groups of people.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Clearly most JP commentators have not read the fricking book. Crichton is EXTREMELY explicit about why he wrote the book the way he did. It's not a book about dinosaurs. It's a book about man's hubris.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      it's more specifically him freaking the frick out over genetic engineering and the possible consequences

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >T-rex eats a massive meal and sits down to rest
      >IMMEDIATELY starts chasing a puny little human for miles down a river
      And it's a shit book

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Running triggers their predatory instinct, like with cats

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          except that they're reptiles, and reptiles don't have the urge to kill everything that moves. if anything, the t rex would've chased them for a couple of meters and roar just to tell them to go frick themselves, that this was its turf. not swim down a river to kill them.
          although, the animals in jurassic park are psychopathic murderers, the equivalent of schizo orphan dropouts that grew without parents and torture small animals in the backyard.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            americans arent able to enjoy content without explicit violence and killings

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What do you expect. The director is Spielberg. You know. The same director who made Jaws which demonized sharks to the point of almost making extinction.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              when were sharks nearly made extinct?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Sure jaws is the reason some sharks are endangered. Definitely not small chinamen pepe.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                likely true

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE NO, IT'S REAL STEPHEN SPIELBURG USED REAL SCITENTISTS ON THE MOVIE THERE THERE'S ABSOLUTELY NO REASON A Hollywood PRODUCTION WOULD TAKE CREATIVE LIBERTIES IN A CREATIVE MEDIUM AND MAKE THINGS THAT AREN'T REAL!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      wrong ‘jak bud

      • 4 weeks ago
        thread hidden

        not wrong jak

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    g

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Why did he draw it pooping?

    • 4 weeks ago
      thread hidden

      aquatic creatures are shit machines

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I get more annoyed when people try to convince me that the raptors were meant to be Deinonychus despite them being called Velociraptor mongoliensis in the book.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      how many velociraptors have they found in montana? You know, where Dr. Grant was digging "velociraptors" in the book?

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    it's not asexual it's a sequential hermaphrodite

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      no it's not. rather they would be parthenogenetic. change in sex only occurred due to social stress caused by the lack of males, it wasn't something programmed to happen at a certain point in life.
      my point is further corroborated by evidence that the "males" never showed any kind of physical and behavioural change or sexual dimorphism, they all still looked the same

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        So it's all your shitty headcanon that goes against what's actually stated in the movie?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          that's what's stated in the fricking movie you moron. grant explicitly says that because every dinosaur is a female, some of them changed sex in order to mate.it's the scene when he picks up the egg shells.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >the movie?
          Aren't we talking about the books?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            it's pretty much the same in this regard, isn't it? by the way, this is an example of sequential hermaphrodite. they're born female and become male when they get older. specifically, it's called proteroginism.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    *hides thread

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Forgot image

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Hot MILF

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          stop

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            lighten up that was hilarious

            except that they're reptiles, and reptiles don't have the urge to kill everything that moves. if anything, the t rex would've chased them for a couple of meters and roar just to tell them to go frick themselves, that this was its turf. not swim down a river to kill them.
            although, the animals in jurassic park are psychopathic murderers, the equivalent of schizo orphan dropouts that grew without parents and torture small animals in the backyard.

            based

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *