Is owning pets unethical?

Is owning pets unethical?

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >is living outside the pod, eating bugs and getting MAID at 50 unethical?

  2. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Always has been

  3. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Is owning pets unethical?
    The way that many (perhaps most) people keep pets, I think yes.
    I'm not authoritarian or left wing politically, quite the opposite, but I think pet ownership should be more regulated in some way, or licensed. Too many people play around with animals' livelihoods like it's a game, with no regard for their long term health and well-being. Unfortunately, it's much the same with children.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      The only reason they are being unethical pet owners is because they themselves have unethical owners who treat their lives like service periods for industrial equipment.

      Crating dogs for hours on end without food, water, or entertainment, neutered indoor cats left alone for days, its all modern abominations spurred on by other abominations. There is nothing that can replace them but more evil unless the devil is cut off at the source.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Some people just have no capacity for empathy, some aren't capable of understanding how to care for another living being, and nothing will change that. I wish it was a simple problem with a simple solution.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          capacity for empathy is correlated with intelligence 😉

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            And there will always be stupid people. That's why my suggestion for licensure is merited, it would filter out people incapable of completing a simple gradeschool test, thereby filtering out those with the least capacity for empathy.

            • 7 months ago
              Anonymous

              >there will always be stupid people
              >can conceive of licensing for pets
              >can not conceive of licensing for reproduction and sterilizing the failures
              imagine instead of slightly happier cats, near-0 crime rates.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Who are you quoting?
                Do you realize that licenses are something that most people already willingly accept as a part of everyday life, and that eugenics is not?
                You have no practical ideas, bye.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Why do you think people need to accept anything

                Most of them are disarmed. They can comply or die.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Frick off gommie

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Commies!!!!
          >has the exact same life he would under stalin at this point
          Corporations are heckin people with rights, commie!

          Feudal societies were more capitalist than modern day america.

      • 7 months ago
        Retrovium

        You can join the amish

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >serfs lived a good life!!
        frick off royalty, never mentions the farmer revolutions huh?

  4. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes kill all pets and then let wild animals in, 10 for each pet, to vandalize and shit everywhere, spread diseases and attack us.

  5. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    I asked my cat, he responds
    >what the frick kind of question is that?
    >give me food to lick but not eat any of the meat

  6. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    You will own nothing and you will be happy. You can rent the pet out and walk it in our Park™ for a small fee though.

  7. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Only if the owner is incompetent or treat their pet as a living accessory, so generally yes. Since people love to compare animals to kids, is having kids unethical? Plenty of parents treat their kids like garbage.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >is having kids unethical? Plenty of parents treat their kids like garbage.
      In many situations I'm inclined to say yes. But does that mean only the happiest, healthiest, and wealthiest should be allowed to breed? Civilization as we know it would collapse.
      At the most extreme end of the argument there are a few that argue all human procreation is unethical because life comes with suffering and the kid has no choice in experiencing it. Though I suppose you need to be alive to even experience a lack of suffering at all.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Before you consider any of this, remember the same people who think not getting literally whatever you want is torture also think that YOU not getting literally whatever you want is normal and any discontent you experience is a mental illness.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          the difference is the pet is an unneeded excuse to buy and we are a needed part of the serfdom without which the upper class would have to do some work themselves or resort to more hired violence than usual. the pet can be replaced with drugs instead of vets and food. you can only be replaced with a highly advanced robot and then sent to die in a war.

          things like happiness and social stability dont factor in here. take your prescribed medication and disorders incompatible with living your life correctly will be treated.

  8. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Canada is already slowly banning the ownership of smaller animals

  9. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >the animal that spent 40,000 years evolving to live with us cant be happy with us
    And then there’s cats

    If you cant keep a dog happy it’s likely that you are unhappy. And oppressed. By who? Oh. You know.

  10. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Does human vanity trump ethics? There is your answer.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      moronic leftist.

      >the animal that spent 40,000 years evolving to live with us cant be happy with us
      And then there’s cats

      If you cant keep a dog happy it’s likely that you are unhappy. And oppressed. By who? Oh. You know.

      Dangerously close to the truth.
      >owning a dog is immoral because you have to work 40-60 hour weeks. Sorry you can’t make it work.
      >Because i FRICKING WHAT
      >think of my prof… the GDP.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        don’t forget there isn’t enough room in the pod you have to live in and you all have to go vegan. the planet must support 20 billion people if welfare payments are to continue and my family is to continue never doing any work from cradle to grave.

  11. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Letting your parents breed would.

  12. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    if THEY want to take that angle THEIR entire system of employment and economic power is unethical. every banker president king and senator must be slaughtered like the pigs they are and man must be allowed to live freely as the hunter gatherer he is.

    oh wait we cant do that because then our lives are shorter and more violent?
    hey that sounds like what happens when you let your pets be "free", free of such inconveniences as not being allowed to even try to do whatever you want. WEIRD.

    i propose they actually want pets gone because they allow you to socially separate yourself from the masses which enables some resistance to propaganda even for a 90 QI goy.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Honestly a little. But I think the positives for both us and the pet usually outweigh the unethical bits. I think it's always unethical to own an uninjured bird, even though I love them.

      >entire system of employment and economic power is unethical. every banker president king and senator must be slaughtered like the pigs they are and man must be allowed to live freely as the hunter gatherer he is.
      this but unironically

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      this homie just made up a whole argument to seethe against lmao. what being alone for so long does to a mf

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        uh oh did he touch on the truth sweatie? that you are oppressed? that you aren't free? that it was never about ethics, and just securing more control and getting more profit out of your short, owned life?

        is that why you need to start making up stories about people being virgins?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *